Skip to main content
Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation logoLink to Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
. 2020 Nov 17;8(1):e908. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000908

Laquinimod dampens IL-1β signaling and Th17-polarizing capacity of monocytes in patients with MS

Sinah Engel 1,*, Valérie Jolivel 1,*, Stefan H-P Kraus 1, Morad Zayoud 1, Karolina Rosenfeld 1, Hayrettin Tumani 1, Roberto Furlan 1, Florian C Kurschus 1, Ari Waisman 1, Felix Luessi 1,
PMCID: PMC7676421  PMID: 33203651

Abstract

Objective

To assess the impact of laquinimod treatment on monocytes and to investigate the underlying immunomodulatory mechanisms in MS.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, we performed in vivo and in vitro analyses of cluster of differentiation (CD14+) monocytes isolated from healthy donors (n = 15), untreated (n = 13), and laquinimod-treated patients with MS (n = 14). Their frequency and the expression of surface activation markers were assessed by flow cytometry and the viability by calcein staining. Cytokine concentrations in the supernatants of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated monocytes were determined by flow cytometry. The messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression level of genes involved in cytokine expression was measured by quantitative PCR. The LPS-mediated nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B-cell (NF-κB) activation was determined by the quantification of the phosphorylation level of the p65 subunit. Laquinimod-treated monocytes were cocultured with CD4+ T cells, and the resulting cytokine production was analyzed by flow cytometry after intracellular cytokine staining. The interleukin (IL)-17A concentration of the supernatant was assessed by ELISA.

Results

Laquinimod did not alter the frequency or viability of circulating monocytes, but led to an upregulation of CD86 expression. LPS-stimulated monocytes of laquinimod-treated patients with MS secreted less IL-1β following a downregulation of IL-1β gene expression. Phosphorylation levels of the NF-κB p65 subunit were reduced after laquinimod treatment, indicating a laquinimod-associated inhibition of the NF-κB pathway. T cells primed with laquinimod-treated monocytes differentiated significantly less into IL-17A–producing T helper (Th)-17 cells.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that inhibited NF-κB signaling and downregulation of IL-1β expression in monocytes contributes to the immunomodulatory effects of laquinimod and that the impairment of Th17 polarization might mediate its disease-modifying activity in MS.


In MS, the complex orchestration of various cell types of the innate and the adaptive immune system leads to an autoimmune-mediated inflammation of the CNS.1 Demyelination and the consecutive tissue damage are largely mediated by encephalitogenic T helper (Th)-1 and interleukin (IL)-17–producing Th17 cells, which are key players of the proinflammatory adaptive immune system.2 However, the pathogenic role of the innate immune system, consisting of myeloid cells such as monocytes, dendritic cells, macrophages and local microglia, is increasingly recognized.

Recent data suggest that myeloid cells not only mediate the expansion of antigen-specific lymphocytes via their antigen-presenting function but that they also promote proinflammatory immune cell responses through cytokine and chemokine secretion.3 Furthermore, tissue-resident monocytes may even directly contribute to lesion formation by the adoption of an inflammatory phenotype as macrophages4 and by the production of reactive oxygen species.1,4,5 The importance of myeloid cells in MS pathogenesis is further underlined by the fact that they constitute the predominant immune cell subset in active MS lesions.6 Infiltrating monocytes are also evident in different animal models of MS such as experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) or cuprizone-induced demyelination,7 where they were identified as a pathogenic granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)–responsive cell type for the development of tissue inflammation.8 Furthermore, the blocking of monocyte recruitment to the CNS inhibits EAE development.9

Laquinimod is a quinoline-3-carboxamide derivative, which has been evaluated as an orally administered medication for the treatment of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). In EAE and the cuprizone model, laquinimod ameliorated the severity of clinical signs and prevented demyelination.1012 In the 2 phase 3 trials, ALLEGRO and BRAVO, laquinimod was well tolerated, yet at the dosage tested (0.6 mg/d) only led to moderate effects on the reduction of relapse rates as primary study end points.1315 Although data indicated beneficial effects on disability progression, brain atrophy, and the risk of sustained disability,13,14 the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use refused marketing authorization for RRMS based on the assessment of the risk-benefit ratio with regard to safety data from animal studies.16 In the phase 2 trial ARPEGGIO, laquinimod did not demonstrate a significant effect on brain volume loss in primary progressive MS (PPMS).17 Furthermore, laquinimod treatment of patients with Huntington disease did not improve total motor scores in the LEGATO-HD trial.18 Subsequently, its development for treatment of MS and Huntington disease was discontinued. Still, the potential of laquinimod for the treatment of Crohn disease19 and uveitis is currently being evaluated.

Although recent data suggest various mechanisms of action by which laquinimod exerts its immunomodulatory effects, much still remains to be elucidated, particularly with regard to the impact of laquinimod on the complex interplay of different immune cell types. Several preclinical studies have demonstrated that laquinimod treatment inhibits the production of proinflammatory cytokines like interferon (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-12, and IL-17 and increases the production of IL-4, IL-10, and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, leading to a downregulation of encephalitogenic Th1 and Th17 immune responses and to an upregulation of regulatory Th2 immune response, respectively.2022 It has further been shown that the downregulation of the reactivity of autoaggressive T cells can partly be attributed to the modulation of proinflammatory signaling at the level of antigen-presenting cells (APCs), such as dendritic cells.23,24 Murine experiments also implicated a contribution of monocytes to this immunomodulatory effect.25 On a molecular basis, an upstream inhibition of the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) pathway might be one of the underlying pathomechanisms for the aforementioned immunomodulatory effects of laquinimod.24,26,27

Besides these anti-inflammatory effects, laquinimod also seems to display neuroprotective properties, as it was found to increase the level of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the serum of patients with MS,25 to exert direct antiapoptotic activity on neurons,28 to protect against glutamate excitotoxicity,29 and to improve remyelination.30

Given the critical role exerted by myeloid cells in MS pathophysiology, this study aimed to assess the impact of laquinimod on monocytes, to illustrate the underlying molecular pathomechanisms, and to investigate the effect of monocyte modulation on proinflammatory T-cell responses. We here report that laquinimod dampens IL-1 signaling and the Th17-polarizing capacity of monocytes in patients with MS.

Methods

Study design, sample collection, and processing

A cross-sectional analysis of monocyte phenotype, cytokine expression, and interaction with T-cell populations was performed in healthy donors (n = 15), untreated patients with RRMS (n = 13), and laquinimod-treated patients with RRMS (n = 14) (table). Treated patients received 0.6 mg laquinimod once daily for an average duration of 4.2 years. A comparable level of disability, as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale,31 was found between the laquinimod-treated patients with MS and the untreated patients with MS.

Table.

Patients details

graphic file with name NEURIMMINFL2020030858t1.jpg

Heparinized blood samples were collected from healthy donors, untreated, and laquinimod-treated patients with MS. Cluster of differentiation (CD14+) monocytes were magnetically sorted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells with human CD14 MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec). Purity and surface expression of CD86, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR, and CD14 of isolated monocytes were assessed by flow cytometry. Thereafter, these cells were plated in a 48-well plate (1 × 106 cells/well) in X-VIVO 15 medium. For messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) analysis, monocytes were snap frozen after 4 hours.

Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents

Informed written consent was obtained by all patients and healthy donors, and the study was approved by a local ethical committee (number 837.019.10). The laquinimod-treated patients were enrolled in open-label extensions of phase III trials.

Flow cytometric analysis

Cells were stained with the following antibody conjugates: anti-CD14-APC, anti-CD14-V500, anti-HLA-DR-V450, anti-CD3-APC-H7, anti-CD4-V450, anti-CD4-PerCP, anti-CD80-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), anti-CD83-PE, anti-CD86-PE, anti-IL-17A-APC, anti-IL-17A-alexa fluor (AF) 647, anti-IFN-γ-FITC, anti-IFN-γ-V450, and anti-NF-κB p65-phosphoethanolamine N-carboxyfluorescein (PE-CF) 594. Antibodies were obtained from Becton Dickinson (BD) Biosciences or eBioscience. Intracellular stainings for IFN-γ and IL-17A were performed using the Cytofix/Cytoperm kit from BD Biosciences. Stained cells were measured by FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star).

Viability measurements

Isolated CD14+ monocytes from healthy donors were cultured with or without laquinimod (10 and 100 μM) in X-VIVO 15 medium. After 24 hours of culture, the monocytes were harvested and counted. Moreover, their viability was assessed by calcein (Invitrogen) that only stains living cells. Propidium iodide (PI, Sigma-Aldrich) was used to stain the dying cells. Calcein was used in a concentration of 1 μg/mL, whereas PI was used in a concentration of 0.5 μM.

Cytokine and chemokine assays

To stimulate the secretion of cytokines and chemokines, the CD14+ monocytes were incubated with 1 μg/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for 24 hours. Thereafter, the supernatant was collected to determine the levels of cytokines and chemokines produced. Cytokine concentrations were measured with the FlowCytomix (eBioscience) Human Th1/Th2/Th9/Th17/Th22 13plex kit (IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12 p70, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-22, and TNF-α). Chemokine concentrations were measured with the FlowCytomix Human Chemokine 6plex kit (G-CSF, IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, MIG, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, and MIP-1β). Data were analyzed with FlowCytomix Pro 2.4. The experimental results represent the fold induction of protein secretion after stimulation with LPS.

RNA isolation and quantitative PCR analysis

The gene expression level of cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α) and chemokines (MIP-1α and MIP-1β) in isolated CD14+ monocytes following 4-hour stimulation with LPS was measured by quantitative PCR. Total RNA from cultured CD14+ monocytes was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). DNase-I treatment was additionally performed to avoid genomic DNA contamination. The total RNA was used to obtain complementary deoxyribonucleic acid (cDNA) by the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System and random hexamer primers (Invitrogen). Real-time PCR was performed with amplification primers by using iQ SYBR Green supermix (BioRad) and the iCycleriQ (BioRad). Relative changes in gene expression were determined using the ΔΔCt method with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), β-actin, and EF1α as reference genes. The experimental results represent the fold induction of the gene expression after stimulation with LPS normalized to GAPDH expression.

Quantitative assessment of NF-κB activation in monocytes

CD14+ monocytes from healthy donors were magnetically isolated as described above and pretreated with 10 and 100 μM of laquinimod and activated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 30 minutes in vitro. Monocyte fixation and permeabilization were performed according to BD Phosflow Protocol III for human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (BD Phosflow Protocol III 2011). To ensure permeabilization of both cell and nuclear membranes, the BD Phosflow Perm Buffer III was used. After permeabilization, the cell samples were washed twice with BD Pharmingen Stain Buffer and resuspended in 100 μL of the buffer. Then, 5 μL aliquots of anti-NF-κB p65-PE-CF594 were added to LPS-treated samples and respective reference samples without stimulus. After incubation for 30 minutes in the dark, samples were analyzed by flow cytometry to assess phosphorylation of p65.

Differentiation of T cells by autologous monocytes

CD14+ monocytes from healthy donors were magnetically isolated as described above. Autologous T cells were purified using the human Pan T Cell Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec). The isolated monocytes were treated with or without laquinimod (10 μM) and LPS (1 μg/mL) for 18 hours in X-VIVO 15 medium, washed, and subsequently cocultured with isolated 105 autologous T cells with or without tetanus toxin (5 μg/mL) in a final volume of 200 μL X-VIVO 15 medium. After 3 days of coculture, cytokine production was analyzed by flow cytometry after intracellular cytokine staining and by ELISA. For the latter, IL-17A in the supernatant was measured using human IL-17A–specific (homodimer) ELISA Ready-SET-Go! (eBioscience).

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using PRISM6 (Graphpad software). Data are presented as mean ± standard error of mean from at least 3 independent experiments (in vitro experiments). We used the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test to compare differences of the mean between 2 independent groups and the Kruskal-Wallis test in case of more than 2 independent groups. To account for errors due to multiple testing, these were followed by a Dunn multiple comparison test.

Data availability

The raw data used in preparation of the figures and tables will be shared in anonymized format on request of a qualified investigator to the corresponding author for purposes of replicating procedures and results.

Results

Laquinimod does not alter the frequency of circulating monocytes in patients or their viability in vitro

There was no significant difference in the CD14+ monocyte counts between healthy donors, untreated, and laquinimod-treated patients with MS (figure 1A).

Figure 1. The frequency and viability of circulating CD14+ monocytes remain unchanged in laquinimod-treated patients with MS.

Figure 1

(A) Comparison of the absolute numbers of CD14+ monocytes per milliliter of whole blood in HDs, untreated patients with MS (MS), and laquinimod-treated patients with MS (Laq-MS) did not reveal any significant group differences of the frequency of CD14+ monocytes. Mean values ± SEM are shown (n ≥ 13). (B) Surface expression of CD14 on monocytes isolated from healthy donors and treated in vitro with 10 or 100 μM laquinimod. (C) The cell viability of monocytes isolated from healthy donors and treated in vitro with laquinimod was evaluated using a PI staining (D) coupled to a calcein staining. (E) Monocytes isolated from healthy donors recovered the end of the culture period after incubation with indicated concentrations of laquinimod expressed as a percentage of untreated control. Data represent mean ± SEM (n = 3). CD = cluster of differentiation; HD = healthy donor; Laq = laquinimod; MFI = mean fluorescence intensity; PI = propidium iodide; SEM = standard error of mean.

The treatment of CD14+ monocytes isolated from healthy donors with laquinimod in a dose of 10 or 100 μM in vitro did not modify the expression of CD14 (figure 1B) or the percentages of PI- (figure 1C) and calcein-positive cells (figure 1D). The cell yield at the end of the culture period reflecting the survival and the proliferation was also not modified by laquinimod (figure 1E).

Laquinimod modulates the expression of activation markers on monocytes

Ex vivo, the expression of CD86 was higher on monocytes of laquinimod-treated patients than on monocytes of healthy donors and untreated patients with MS, whereas there was no difference of the expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC-II) (figure 2A).

Figure 2. Laquinimod modulates the expression of monocyte activation markers in patients with MS.

Figure 2

(A) Surface expression of CD86 and MHC-II on CD14+ monocytes isolated from HDs, untreated patients with MS (MS), and laquinimod-treated patients with MS (Laq-MS) was assessed by flow cytometry. Laquinimod-treated patients with MS demonstrated higher expression levels of CD86 than healthy donors and untreated patients with MS. MHC-II expression did not differ between the 3 groups. The individual MFI ± SEM is shown (n ≥ 10), **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. (B) Surface expression of CD80, CD83, CD86, and MHC-II on monocytes isolated from healthy donors and treated in vitro with 10 and 100 μM laquinimod was quantified by flow cytometry. Only the treatment of monocytes with 10 μM of laquinimod led to a slight increase in MHC-II expression. Data represent mean ± SEM (n = 3), *p < 0.05. CD = cluster of differentiation; HD = healthy donor; Laq = laquinimod; MFI = mean fluorescence intensity; MHC = major histocompatibility complex; SEM = standard error of mean.

However, the in vitro treatment of HD monocytes with 10 and with 100 μM of laquinimod did not lead to significant changes of the expression of CD80, CD83, and CD86, whereas here, we observed a slight upregulation of MHC-II expression after incubation with 10 μM laquinimod but not after incubation with 100 μM laquinimod (figure 2B).

Laquinimod reduces the IL-1β secretion of monocytes via downregulation of gene expression

LPS stimulation of isolated CD14+ monocytes of laquinimod-treated patients with MS led to a significant downregulation of IL-1β secretion compared with LPS-stimulated monocytes of HDs and untreated patients with MS (figure 3A). Furthermore, the IL-1β gene expression of the monocytes of laquinimod-treated patients on LPS stimulation was significantly downregulated compared with HDs. Compared with untreated patients with MS, the IL-1β gene expression also showed a trend to be lower, which, however, failed to reach significance (figure 3B).

Figure 3. Laquinimod reduces the secretion of IL-1β and downregulates its gene expression in patients with MS.

Figure 3

(A) The concentrations of IL-1β in the supernatants of CD14+ monocytes cultured with or without LPS for 24 hours were assessed by flow cytometry, and the fold induction of cytokine secretion after stimulation with LPS was determined. Monocytes of laquinimod-treated patients with MS secreted significantly less IL-1β than those of untreated patients with MS and healthy donors. Mean values ± SEM are shown (n ≥ 10); **p < 0.01. (B) The gene expression level IL-1β in isolated CD14+ monocytes following 4-hour stimulation with LPS was measured by quantitative PCR. The experimental results represent the fold induction of the gene expression after stimulation with LPS normalized to GAPDH expression. Laquinimod-treated patients with MS had lower IL-1β expression levels than healthy donors. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10); *p < 0.05. CD = cluster of differentiation; HD = healthy donor; GAPDH = glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; IL = interleukin; Laq = laquinimod; LPS = lipopolysaccharide; SEM = standard error of mean.

The secretion of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, and MIP-1β was reduced in LPS-stimulated monocytes of laquinimod-treated patients with MS compared with HDs, but not in comparison to untreated patients with MS, and the secretion of MIP-1α (CC-chemokine ligand [CCL] 3) was lower in both untreated and laquinimod-treated patients with MS compared with HDs. The secretion of MCP-1 (CCL2) showed no significant group differences (figure e-1, links.lww.com/NXI/A333).

The mRNA expression of TNF-α, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, Caspase-1, IL-18, IL-1R1, IL-1R2, toll-like receptor (TLR) 4, MyD88, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, CD62L, and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 genes did not differ between HDs, untreated patients with MS, and patients on laquinimod treatment (figure e-2, links.lww.com/NXI/A333).

Laquinimod inhibits NF-κB signaling in monocytes

In vitro treatment of monocytes isolated from HDs with 10 μM laquinimod led to a reduction of LPS-induced phosphorylation levels of the NF-κB p65 subunit compared with untreated monocytes, whereas 1 μM laquinimod did not demonstrate relevant effects (figure 4A). This indicates a dose-dependent inhibition of the NF-κB signaling pathway by laquinimod.

Figure 4. Laquinimod inhibits LPS-mediated NF-κB activation and reduces the Th17-polarizing capacity of monocytes.

Figure 4

(A) Monocytes with laquinimod pretreatment at indicated concentration were stimulated with LPS for induction of NF-κB p65 subunit phosphorylation. Monocytes without LPS stimulation served as controls. Phosphorylation levels of p65 of were reduced in monocytes pretreated with 10 μM of laquinimod. Phosphorylated p65 levels were quantified as geometric means. (B) Quantification of the percentage of CD4+ T cells producing IL-17 after stimulation with autologous monocytes previously treated or not with laquinimod showed that laquinimod treatment led to a lower number of CD4+ differentiating into Th17 cells. (C) The concentrations of IL-17A in the coculture supernatants were determined by ELISA. Laquinimod treatment led to significantly lower levels of IL-17A. (D) Quantification of the percentage of CD4+ T cells producing IFN-γ after stimulation with autologous monocytes previously treated or not with laquinimod revealed no differences. Values represent mean ± SEM (n = 3), *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. CD = cluster of differentiation; IFN = interferon; IL = interleukin; Laq = laquinimod; LPS = lipopolysaccharide; MFI = mean fluorescence intensity; NF-κB = nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; SEM = standard error of mean; Th = T helper cell.

Laquinimod reduces the Th17-polarizing capacity of monocytes

Intracellular staining revealed that T cells primed with laquinimod-treated monocytes loaded with tetanus toxin differentiated significantly less into IL-17A–producing T cells compared with T cells, which were primed with untreated monocytes (figure 4B). This was confirmed by lower IL-17A levels in the coculture supernatant (figure 4C). In contrast, the differentiation into IFN-γ–producing T cells was not influenced by laquinimod treatment (figure 4D).

Discussion

Myeloid cells, including monocytes, are known to exert prominent roles in the pathology of MS.32 In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed the effect of laquinimod therapy on circulating monocytes of patients with RRMS and investigated the underlying pathomechanisms by performing in vitro experiments.

In line with previous reports,33,34 our study confirmed that laquinimod treatment does not change the absolute count of circulating monocytes of patients with MS in vivo. Moreover, the absence of any antiproliferative activity coupled to the innocuity exerted on monocytes cultured in vitro underlines the hypothesis that the effects of laquinimod treatment are not mediated by immunosuppression.

Because of their function and expression kinetics, CD86 and CD80 affect the immune response in different ways. CD86 delivers the main costimulatory signal in the early stage, whereas CD80 is expressed later after previous proinflammatory stimulation.35,36 Defects of proteins involved in these pathways have been associated with the development of MS.37,38

In the ex vivo assessment of costimulatory profiles, we observed an elevated expression of CD86 on unstimulated monocytes of laquinimod-treated patients in comparison to monocytes of healthy donors and untreated patients with MS. This parallels previous studies reporting that laquinimod increases the CD86 expression on unstimulated murine monocytes in EAE25 and unstimulated human DCs in MS.24 The in vitro laquinimod exposition of unstimulated monocytes from healthy donors did not change the expression of CD86 and CD80 in the current study. In contrast, it has been shown recently that monocytes of laquinimod-treated patients with MS express lower levels of CD86 than those of untreated patients with MS after stimulation with LPS, whereas CD80 expression was not affected.33 This apparent discrepancy to our data might indicate that the impact of laquinimod on CD86 expression of monocytes depends on their state of activation.

Although we did not observe a difference in CD86 expression on monocytes of untreated patients with MS and healthy donors, Chuluundorj et al.39 have previously reported an elevated CD86 expression in a larger cohort of untreated patients with MS, which led them to hypothesize that inflammatory monocytes from patients with MS might have a higher capability to costimulate T-cell activation.

Monocytes are recognized as major sources of cytokine and chemokine secretion in MS40 and are sensitive to LPS stimulation because CD14 represents a high-affinity receptor for LPS.41 As the expression levels of CD14 in our study showed no differences between monocytes cultivated in the absence or in the presence of laquinimod, the responsiveness to LPS was unlikely affected by the treatment with laquinimod.

The monocytes of the laquinimod-treated patients with MS in our study released significantly lower levels of various cytokines and chemokines (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β) in comparison to healthy donors, but not compared with untreated patients with MS. Therefore, it is not possible to attribute these effects solely to the treatment with laquinimod, and disease-specific differences in the monocytes' response to stimulation need to be taken into consideration.

However, we did observe a significant downregulation of IL-1β secretion in laquinimod-treated patients compared with both healthy controls and untreated patients with MS, which strongly indicates that the suppression of the IL-1β secretion in monocytes is caused by laquinimod. This assumption could be supported at the transcriptomic level as the mRNA expression of IL-1β was also significantly reduced on laquinimod therapy in patients with MS. The mRNA expression of other genes relevant to IL-1β cleavage or IL-1β receptor signaling like Caspase-1, IL-1R1, IL1-R2, or MyD88 was not altered by laquinimod treatment. Thus, it can be hypothesized that laquinimod leads to a reduction of IL-1β secretion through the selective inhibition of IL-1β gene expression.

The NF-κB pathway is known to play an important role in the regulated expression of cytokines and chemokines in monocytes.42 Here, we demonstrated that in human monocytes, laquinimod reduced the p65 phosphorylation after stimulation with LPS. Phosphorylation of the p65 subunit in the cytosol of monocytes leads to a translocation of the transcription factor NF-κB into the nucleus, where it induces the expression of cytokines, including IL-1β.42,43 Our current finding supports an earlier report that laquinimod prevents the loss of inhibitory I-κB protein in laquinimod-treated monocytes on LPS stimulation, reflecting an inhibition of NF-κB pathway activation.44 Furthermore, a laquinimod-mediated downregulation of NF-κB activation has been demonstrated previously for other cell types such as dendritic cells or astrocytes.11,24

Of interest, similar effects of laquinimod treatment have recently been demonstrated in experimental models of other neurologic and systemic inflammatory diseases. For example, laquinimod treatment of monocytes taken from patients with Huntington disease was also found to secrete lower levels of inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β,45 and in osteoarthritis, laquinimod ameliorated the IL-1β–induced generation of reactive oxygen species via a suppression of the NF-κB pathway.46

The functional relevance of laquinimod-induced alteration of cytokine secretion pattern in MS pathology was confirmed in our in vitro coculture experiments. Here, laquinimod-treated monocytes had a reduced capacity to polarize CD4+ T cells into Th17 cells and led to lower levels of IL-17A secretion. A similar observation has been reported in EAE mice where laquinimod reduced the capacity of isolated monocytes to promote a proinflammatory T-cell response in vitro.25

The role of IL-1β in the generation of Th17 cells, which are major culprits in the pathogenesis of EAE and are considered to play a pathogenic role in causing sustained tissue damage in neuroinflammation,47,48 has been proposed previously.22,49 IL-1β can act on subsets of human Th cells expressing the IL-1R,50 and the in vitro polarization of naive human Th cells in a mixture containing IL-1β induced the expression of IL-17A.51 Furthermore, the importance of the IL-1R1 in the generation of proinflammatory Th17 cells regulated by GM-CSF–driven monocyte-derived DCs has also been highlighted.8

Two limitations of this study have to be addressed. First, the findings have to be interpreted with care as the observed effects are based on a small sample size. Second, our study lacks data from patients with PPMS, in which laquinimod has been tested as well.17 Further investigations need to elucidate how monocyte subsets relevant to MS39,52 are differentially affected by laquinimod.

Our current findings suggest that the immunomodulatory effects of laquinimod involve decreased phosphorylation of p65 in NF-κB pathway and downregulation of IL-1β expression in monocytes. The consecutive decrease in IL-1β levels might further translate to an impaired differentiation and maintenance of inflammatory Th17 cells. Although the admission procedure of laquinimod for the treatment of MS has been discontinued, these findings are still of importance as they offer valuable insights into the pathogenesis of MS and for the evaluation of the potential of laquinimod for the treatment of other disease.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Andreas Zymny, Heike Ehrengard, and Birgit Hohmann for technical assistance and Cheryl Ernest for proofreading the manuscript.

Glossary

AF

alexa fluor

APC

antigen-presenting cell

BD

Becton Dickinson

CCL

CC-chemokine ligand

CD

cluster of differentiation

cDNA

complementary deoxyribonucleic acid

EAE

experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

FITC

fluorescein isothiocyanate

GAPDH

glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase

GM-CSF

granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor

HLA

human leukocyte antigen

ICAM

intercellular adhesion molecule

IFN

interferon

IL

interleukin

LPS

lipopolysaccharide

MCP

monocyte chemoattractant protein

MHC

major histocompatibility complex

MIP

macrophage inflammatory protein

MMP

matrix metalloproteinase

mRNA

messenger ribonucleic acid

NF-κB

nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells

PE-CF

phosphoethanolamine N-carboxyfluorescein

PI

propidium iodide

PPMS

primary progressive MS

RRMS

relapsing-remitting MS

TGF

transforming growth factor

Th

T helper cell

TLR

toll-like receptor

TNF

tumor necrosis factor

Appendix. Authors

Appendix.

Appendix.

Study funding

This work was supported by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) German Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis (KKNMS), the German Research Council (DFG, CRC-TR-128), and an unrestricted grant from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Netanya, Israel. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries sponsored the clinical studies from which patient samples were collected. Laquinimod is owned by Active Biotech, Lund Sweden.

Disclosure

K. Rosenfeld performed her MD thesis on the topic of the present study. S. Engel, V. Jolivel, S. H.-P. Kraus, M. Zayoud, K. Rosenfeld, F. Kurschus, and A. Waisman report no disclosures. H. Tumani received speaker honoraria from Bayer, Biogen, Fresenius, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Siemens, and Teva; serves as section editor for the Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry, and Brain Research; and receives research support from Fresenius, Genzyme, Merck, and Novartis. R. Furlan received honoraria for serving on scientific advisory boards or as a speaker from Biogen, Novartis, Roche, and Merck and funding for research from Merck. F. Luessi served on the advisory board of Roche and received travel funding from Teva. Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures.

References

  • 1.Thompson AJ, Baranzini SE, Geurts J, Hemmer B, Ciccarelli O. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2018;391:1622–1636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jones AP, Kermode AG, Lucas RM, Carroll WM, Nolan D, Hart PH. Circulating immune cells in multiple sclerosis. Clin Exp Immunol 2017;187:193–203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lin CC, Edelson BT. New insights into the role of IL-1beta in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis. J Immunol 2017;198:4553–4560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Locatelli G, Theodorou D, Kendirli A, et al. Mononuclear phagocytes locally specify and adapt their phenotype in a multiple sclerosis model. Nat Neurosci 2018;21:1196–1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nikic I, Merkler D, Sorbara C, et al. A reversible form of axon damage in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis. Nat Med 2011;17:495–499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lucchinetti C, Brück W, Parisi J, Scheithauer B, Rodriguez M, Lassmann H. Heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis lesions: implications for the pathogenesis of demyelination. Ann Neurol 2000;47:707–717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Caravagna C, Jaouën A, Desplat-Jégo S, et al. Diversity of innate immune cell subsets across spatial and temporal scales in an EAE mouse model. Sci Rep 2018;8:5146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Croxford AL, Lanzinger M, Hartmann FJ, et al. The cytokine GM-CSF drives the inflammatory signature of CCR2+ monocytes and licenses autoimmunity. Immunity 2015;43:502–514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ajami B, Bennett JL, Krieger C, McNagny KM, Rossi FM. Infiltrating monocytes trigger EAE progression, but do not contribute to the resident microglia pool. Nat Neurosci 2011;14:1142–1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bruck W, Pfortner R, Pham T, et al. Reduced astrocytic NF-kappaB activation by laquinimod protects from cuprizone-induced demyelination. Acta Neuropathol 2012;124:411–424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kramann N, Menken L, Hayardeny L, Hanisch UK, Brück W. Laquinimod prevents cuprizone-induced demyelination independent of Toll-like receptor signaling. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2016;3:e233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jönsson S, Andersson G, Fex T, et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of new 1,2-dihydro-4-hydroxy-2-oxo-3-quinolinecarboxamides for treatment of autoimmune disorders: structure-activity relationship. J Med Chem 2004;47:2075–2088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Comi G, Jeffery D, Kappos L, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of oral laquinimod for multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1000–1009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Filippi M, Rocca MA, Pagani E, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of oral laquinimod in multiple sclerosis: MRI evidence of an effect on brain tissue damage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014;85:851–858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sorensen PS, Comi G, Vollmer TL, et al. Laquinimod safety profile: pooled analyses from the ALLEGRO and BRAVO trials. Int J MS Care 2017;19:16–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Thöne J, Linker RA. Laquinimod in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review of the data so far. Drug Des Devel Ther 2016;10:1111–1118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Giovannoni G, Knappertz V, Steinerman JR, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of laquinimod in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2020;95:e1027–e1040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Reilmann R, Gordon MF, Anderson KE, et al. Legato-HD study: a phase 2 study assessing the efficacy and safety of laquinimod as a treatment for Huntington disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2018;89(suppl 1):A99. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.D'Haens G, Sandborn WJ, Colombel JF, et al. A phase II study of laquinimod in Crohn's disease. Gut 2015;64:1227–1235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zou LP, Abbas N, Volkmann I, et al. Suppression of experimental autoimmune neuritis by ABR-215062 is associated with altered Th1/Th2 balance and inhibited migration of inflammatory cells into the peripheral nerve tissue. Neuropharmacology 2002;42:731–739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yang JS, Xu LY, Xiao BG, Hedlund G, Link H. Laquinimod (ABR-215062) suppresses the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, modulates the Th1/Th2 balance and induces the Th3 cytokine TGF-beta in Lewis rats. J Neuroimmunol 2004;156:3–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wegner C, Stadelmann C, Pförtner R, et al. Laquinimod interferes with migratory capacity of T cells and reduces IL-17 levels, inflammatory demyelination and acute axonal damage in mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neuroimmunol 2010;227:133–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schulze-Topphoff U, Shetty A, Varrin-Doyer M, et al. Laquinimod, a quinoline-3-carboxamide, induces type II myeloid cells that modulate central nervous system autoimmunity. PLoS One 2012;7:e33797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jolivel V, Luessi F, Masri J, et al. Modulation of dendritic cell properties by laquinimod as a mechanism for modulating multiple sclerosis. Brain 2013;136(pt 4):1048–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Thöne J, Ellrichmann G, Seubert S, et al. Modulation of autoimmune demyelination by laquinimod via induction of brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Am J Pathol 2012;180:267–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gurevich M, Gritzman T, Orbach R, Tuller T, Feldman A, Achiron A. Laquinimod suppress antigen presentation in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: in-vitro high-throughput gene expression study. J Neuroimmunol 2010;221:87–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zilkha-Falb R, Gurevich M, Hayardeny L, Achiron A. The role of laquinimod in modulation of the immune response in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: lessons from gene expression signatures. J Neuroimmunol 2015;283:11–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ehrnhoefer DE, Caron NS, Deng Y, Qiu X, Tsang M, Hayden MR. Laquinimod decreases Bax expression and reduces-6 activation in neurons. Exp Neurol 2016;283(pt A):121–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gentile A, Musella A, De Vito F, et al. Laquinimod ameliorates excitotoxic damage by regulating glutamate re-uptake. J Neuroinflammation 2018;15:5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Garcia-Miralles M, Yusof N, Tan JY, et al. Laquinimod treatment improves myelination deficits at the transcriptional and ultrastructural levels in the YAC128 mouse model of Huntington disease. Mol Neurobiol 2019;56:4464–4478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33:1444–1452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mishra MK, Yong VW. Myeloid cells–targets of medication in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 2016;12:539–551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Stasiolek M, Linker RA, Hayardeny L, Bar Ilan O, Gold R. Immune parameters of patients treated with laquinimod, a novel oral therapy for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: results from a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Immun Inflamm Dis 2015;3:45–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lund BT, Kelland EE, Hayardeny L, Barilan O, Gilmore W, Weiner LP. Assessment of changes in immune measures of multiple sclerosis patients treated with laquinimod. J Neuroimmunol 2013;263:108–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chambers CA. The expanding world of co-stimulation: the two-signal model revisited. Trends Immunol 2001;22:217–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Munn DH, Sharma MD, Mellor AL. Ligation of B7-1/B7-2 by human CD4+ T cells triggers indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity in dendritic cells. J Immunol 2004;172:4100–4110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wagner M, Sobczynski M, Karabon L, et al. Polymorphisms in CD28, CTLA-4, CD80 and CD86 genes may influence the risk of multiple sclerosis and its age of onset. J Neuroimmunol 2015;288:79–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sansom DM. CD28, CTLA-4 and their ligands: who does what and to whom? Immunology 2000;101:169–177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chuluundorj D, Harding SA, Abernethy D, La Flamme AC. Expansion and preferential activation of the CD14(+)CD16(+) monocyte subset during multiple sclerosis. Immunol Cel Biol 2014;92:509–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Göbel K, Ruck T, Meuth SG. Cytokine signaling in multiple sclerosis: lost in translation. Mult Scler 2018;24:432–439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kim D, Kim JY. Anti-CD14 antibody reduces LPS responsiveness via TLR4 internalization in human monocytes. Mol Immunol 2014;57:210–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.de Wit H, Dokter WH, Koopmans SB, et al. Regulation of p100 (NFKB2) expression in human monocytes in response to inflammatory mediators and lymphokines. Leukemia 1998;12:363–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mezzasoma L, Antognelli C, Talesa VN. A novel role for brain natriuretic peptide: inhibition of IL-1beta secretion via downregulation of NF-kB/Erk 1/2 and NALP3/ASC/-1 activation in human THP-1 monocyte. Mediators Inflamm 2017;2017:5858315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mishra MK, Wang J, Silva C, Mack M, Yong VW. Kinetics of proinflammatory monocytes in a model of multiple sclerosis and its perturbation by laquinimod. Am J Pathol 2012;181:642–651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dobson L, Träger U, Farmer R, et al. Laquinimod dampens hyperactive cytokine production in Huntington's disease patient myeloid cells. J Neurochem 2016;137:782–794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Xie P, Dan F, Yu G, Ruan W, Yu H. Laquinimod mitigated IL-1beta-induced impairment of the cartilage extracellular matrix in human ATDC5 chondrocytes. Chem Res Toxicol 2020;33:933–939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Korn T, Bettelli E, Oukka M, Kuchroo VK. IL-17 and Th17 cells. Annu Rev Immunol 2009;27:485–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sie C, Korn T, Mitsdoerffer M. Th17 cells in central nervous system autoimmunity. Exp Neurol 2014;262(pt A):18–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chung Y, Chang SH, Martinez GJ, et al. Critical regulation of early Th17 cell differentiation by interleukin-1 signaling. Immunity 2009;30:576–587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shirakawa F, Tanaka Y, Ota T, Suzuki H, Eto S, Yamashita U. Expression of interleukin 1 receptors on human peripheral T cells. J Immunol 1987;138:4243–4248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sha Y, Markovic-Plese S. Activated IL-1RI signaling pathway induces Th17 cell differentiation via interferon regulatory factor 4 signaling in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Front Immunol 2016;7:543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fingerle-Rowson G, Angstwurm M, Andreesen R, Ziegler-Heitbrock HW. Selective depletion of CD14+ CD16+ monocytes by glucocorticoid therapy. Clin Exp Immunol 1998;112:501–506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data used in preparation of the figures and tables will be shared in anonymized format on request of a qualified investigator to the corresponding author for purposes of replicating procedures and results.


Articles from Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation are provided here courtesy of American Academy of Neurology

RESOURCES