Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 5;69(12):2150–2158. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319804

Table 3.

Post-training detection rates based on colonoscopies performed by trained vs untrained endoscopists

2015 2016 2017 2018 Overall post-training
Trained endoscopists (n=2687) By untrained endoscopists (n=10 420) Trained endoscopists (n=2921) Untrained endoscopists (n=12 295) Trained endoscopists (n=2700) Untrained endoscopists (n=13 737) Trained endoscopists (n=1453) Untrained endoscopists (n=8515) Trained endoscopists (n=10 377) Untrained endoscopists (n=44 967) OR (95% CI) P value*
≥1 Proximal SP (=PSPDR), % 12.50% 10% 13% 10% 15% 10% 16% 10% 14% 10% 1.49 (1.07 to 2.07) 0.018
 ≥1 SP 28% 25% 28% 25% 27% 23% 2.70% 21% 28% 24% 1.27 (1.04 to 2.55) 0.021
 ≥1 HP 23% 20% 21.50% 19% 20% 17% 21.50% 16% 22% 18% 1.30 (1.02 to 1.65) 0.035
 ≥1 SSL 8.90% 7.50% 10% 7.80% 11% 7.90% 9.30% 7.40% 9.70% 7.70% 1.30 (1.02 to 1.66) 0.034
 ≥1 TSA 0.70% 1.00% 0.90% 1.00% 0.70% 0.90% 0.60% 0.60% 0.70% 0.90% 0.89 (0.62 to 1.30) 0.58
≥1 Adenoma (=ADR), % 70% 69% 71% 67% 68.50% 63% 63% 57% 68.50% 64% 1.20 (1.04 to 1.38) 0.012
≥1 Advanced adenoma 49% 50% 47% 44% 41% 39% 37% 36% 45% 42% 1.08 (0.95 to 1.22) 0.23

Percentages ≥10% are rounded to the nearest integer.

*P values are based on mixed-effects logistic regression analyses, with fixed effects for training and adjusted with random intercepts for type of centre and endoscopist.

ADR, adenoma detection rate; HP, hyperplastic polyp; PSPDR, proximal serrated polyp detection rate; SP, serrated polyp; SSL, sessile serrated lesion; TSA, traditional serrated adenoma.