Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms in women often first occur or worsen during pregnancy and the postpartum, while the occurrence of obsessions and compulsions during the perinatal period is greater in women with comorbid depression (Fairbrother et al., 2016), suggesting a possible etiological overlap between perinatal OCD and depressive symptoms. We previously identified two biomarker loci (HP1BP3 and TTC9B) that, in conjunction with the proportion of monocytes in blood based on complete blood counts (CBCs), were capable of prospectively predicting antenatal and postpartum depression in humans with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 82% (Payne et al., 2020). The first objective of this study was to generate a proxy of monocyte proportion to enable model testing in cohorts without CBC information. The second objective was to assess the efficacy of PPD specific biomarker loci to identify exacerbations of OCD symptoms that occurred during pregnancy.
Human cohorts involved in the study for model building and proxy generation consisted of the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) Neuroimaging and Prospective cohorts described previously (Payne et al., 2020). Independent model evaluation for the second objective relied on a cohort of N = 48 participants (44 women in 22 matched pairs, age range 19–49 years old) selected from OCD-affected women that participated at the JHU site of the OCD Collaborative Genetics Study (2001–2006) (Samuels et al., 2006) or the OCD Collaborative Genetic Association Study (2007–2012) (Mattheisen et al., 2015).
We used the following strategy to perform the first objective. Using data from the GEO dataset GSE39981 that contains HM27 generated methylomes from FACs isolated cell types, we performed a probewise student’s t-test of N = 5 monocyte vs. N = 41 non-monocyte derived DNA methylation levels and found 6635 probes exhibited significant differences between groups after FDR based correction for multiple testing. To narrow this further, we took the top 5% of significant p values, which resulted in 41 probes. This set was narrowed further to 14 probes exhibiting significant association between DNA methylation and the ratio of monocytes to non-monocytes in N = 16 individuals with available differential CBC data from the JHU Prospective cohort. Of these probes, we selected probe cg10853416 located within 1500 bp of the transcription start site of the Membrane-Spanning 4-Domains, Subfamily A, Member 7 (MS4A7) for follow up analysis, as it is the only probe from the identified 14 expressed specifically in mature monocytes (Gingras et al., 2001). To validate this choice, we used pyrosequencing to measure DNA methylation of MS4A7 and identified a significant association with the differential CBC derived ratio of monocytes to non-monocytes in N = 21 samples from the independent JHU Neuroimaging cohort (β= −120.19 ± 41.6, F = 8.35, df=1/19, p = 0.0094), suggesting this probe may function as an adequate proxy of monocyte ratios for our modeling purposes.
With a proxy in hand, we next sought to generate a model capable of predicting exacerbation of OCD symptoms during pregnancy. Using a random forest machine learning approach, we trained a model on the presence (N = 4) or absence (N = 20) of obsessions occurring during pregnancy in the euthymic subset of women from the JHU Prospective Cohort. The random forest model was able to predict the training set with an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.47–1). We then applied the model to an independent test set and were able to distinguish a group of N = 21 women who experienced OCD symptom exacerbation from N = 20 women who did not with an AUC of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.59–0.91). To assess the importance of each model factor, we performed a Monte-Carlo card sorting task with 10,000 permutations, randomly shuffling each biomarker locus and recalculating the prediction AUC to create a null distribution of predictions for each locus. Permutation demonstrated that TTC9B and MS4A7 were most important to model performance (p = 0.0027, p = 0.034, respectively), while HP1BP3 exhibited a non-significant effect (p = 0.057).
Our work provides evidence for an etiological overlap between postpartum depression and perinatal OCD symptoms. Notably, the predictive efficacy of the model was tested for each biomarker, and TTC9B demonstrated the most significant evidence for contributing to OCD exacerbation. As discussed previously by Payne et al., (Payne et al., 2020), TTC9B epigenetic variation has been suggested by Shrestha et al., to mediate estrogen signaling, due in part to the demonstrated role of its close homologue, TTC9A, in mediating estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) signaling and by Lim et al., to alter rodent serotonin and behavior in the context of estrogen. Despite a lack of clear statistical significance, the permutation generated p value of 0.057 suggests that HP1BP3 is contributing at least some relevant biology. As previously discussed within Payne et al., Garfinkel et al., has suggested a role for HP1BP3 in mediating anxiety in female mice while the offspring of HP1BP3 KO mice had significantly lower survival rates due to a deficit in maternal care that could be reversed upon cross fostering. Cumulatively, the data suggest that HP1BP3 plays an important role in behaviorally mediated offspring survival and anxiety behaviors and warrants further study in the context of perinatal OCD.
This work suffers from several limitations, including a relatively small sample size of the training set, which was confined to the antenatal euthymic group of women. Furthermore, as our test set was comprised of approximately equal numbers of cases and controls, the predictive efficacy of any biomarker test based on these findings may not be representative of performance in the OCD population. Despite these caveats, our work provides suggestive evidence that a PPD biomarker model based on the association of epigenetic variation with gonadal hormone sensitivity is moderately predictive of OCD symptom exacerbation. These conclusions suggest that future etiologic studies of OCD should take into account hormonal variations and their associated downstream signaling pathways.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank The Solomon R. & Rebecca D. Baker Foundation, DIFD, and the Mach-Gaensslen Foundation for their generous support of this research. This work was supported by a 2010 NARSAD Young Investigator Award, R01MH104262, K23 MH074799-01A2, R01-MH50214, R01-MH071507, NIH/NCRR/OPD-GCRC RR00052, and the James E. Marshall OCD Foundation. The Johns Hopkins University IRB approved this research and all subjects gave consent for the study. Prospective human subjects’ research for the Johns Hopkins Prospective PPD Cohort was conducted under IRB protocol # 00008149. Prospective human subjects’ research for the Johns Hopkins BRAINS Neuroimaging Cohort was conducted under Johns Hopkins IRB protocols # 00038271 and 00027369. Human subjects’ research for the OCD cohort was conducted under Johns Hopkins IRB protocol # NA_00039786/CR00013867. All protocols conform to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Footnotes
Declaration of Competing Interest
Z.K. and J.P. are listed as investors on a patent to use the above biomarkers to predict postpartum depression. Z.K. is the founder of and holds equity in METHYX LLC. He also serves as the company’s Managing Member. METHYX LLC intends to license technology used in the study that is described in this publication. This arrangement has been reviewed and approved by the Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. J.P. received legal consulting fees from Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, and Abbott Pharmaceuticals and received research support from the NIMH, the Stanley Medical Research Foundation, and SAGE Therapeutics. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Supplementary materials
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113332.
References
- Fairbrother N, Janssen P, Antony MM, Tucker E, Young AH, 2016. Perinatal anxiety disorder prevalence and incidence. J. Affect. Disord 200, 148–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gingras MC, Lapillonne H, Margolin JF, 2001. CFFM4: a new member of the CD20/FcepsilonRIbeta family. Immunogenetics 53 (6), 468–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mattheisen M, Samuels JF, Wang Y, Greenberg BD, Fyer AJ, McCracken JT, Geller DA, Murphy DL, Knowles JA, Grados MA, Riddle MA, Rasmussen SA, McLaughlin NC, Nurmi EL, Askland KD, Qin HD, Cullen BA, Piacentini J, Pauls DL, Bienvenu OJ, Stewart SE, Liang KY, Goes FS, Maher B, Pulver AE, Shugart YY, Valle D, Lange C, Nestadt G, 2015. Genome-wide association study in obsessive-compulsive disorder: results from the OCGAS. Mol. Psychiatry 20 (3), 337–344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Payne JL, Osborne LM, Cox O, Kelly J, Meilman S, Jones I, Grenier W, Clark K, Ross E, McGinn R, Wadhwa PD, Entringer S, Dunlop AL, Knight AK, Smith AK, Buss C, Kaminsky ZA, 2020. DNA methylation biomarkers prospectively predict both antenatal and postpartum depression. Psychiatry Res. 285, 112711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samuels JF, Riddle MA, Greenberg BD, Fyer AJ, McCracken JT, Rauch SL, Murphy DL, Grados MA, Pinto A, Knowles JA, Piacentini J, Cannistraro PA, Cullen B, Bienvenu OJ 3rd, Rasmussen SA, Pauls DL, Willour VL, Shugart YY, Liang KY, Hoehn-Saric R, Nestadt G, 2006. The OCD collaborative genetics study: methods and sample description. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet 141B (3), 201–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
