Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Atencion Primaria logoLink to Atencion Primaria
. 2013 Apr 5;26(6):383–388. [Article in Spanish] doi: 10.1016/S0212-6567(00)78687-2

El informe de alta hospitalaria en atención primaria (I). Análisis de su utilidad

Hospital discharge reports received by primary care (i). analysis of their usefulness

I Buxadé Martí a,*, J Canals Innamorati a, JC Montero Alcaraz a, J Pérez Galindo a, I Bolíbar Ribas b
PMCID: PMC7681385  PMID: 11111310

Abstract

Objectives

To calculate the number of hospital discharge reports (HDR) received in primary care for determined kinds of patients suffering chronic pathologies who need on-going care. To evaluate whether the reports' contents are of use to the family doctor's monitoring of the patient.

Design

Descriptive study.

Setting

Four reformed health districts that share the same referral hospital in the city of Mataró (Barcelona).

Patients and other participants

124 patients were discharged in 1996 for pathologies requiring ongoing care in primary care (diabetes, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebral vascular accident, femur fracture and neoplasms).

Interventions

Systematic comparison of various sections of the HDR with the information in the primary care clinical notes (PCCN).

Measurements and main results

In 12.9% (95% CI, 8.1–18.8%) of the PCCNs examined, there was no record of the HDR. In 76.6% (69.1–84.1%) of the patients studied, the HDR contributed new information on some of the contents reviewed («useful» HDR). In the remaining 22.6% (15.2–30.0%) the HDR contributed no new information and left out necessary follow-up and monitoring information («useless» HDR). Nevertheless, in as many as 89.5% (84.1–94.9%) of the patients, the PCCNs recorded some clinically important piece of information or intervention that did not figure in the HDR. This occurred more often in questions of prevention and quality of life (56.5%), special treatment (42.3% of those who needed it), anamnesis (40.3%) and follow-up (31.5%).

Conclusions

Despite the potential importance of HDRs for on-going care of patients discharged from hospital for chronic complaints, and although a high percentage of HDRs reach the general practitioner, their lack of content negates their usefulness in 22.6% or more of cases.

Bibliografía

  • 1.Orden del 6 de septiembre de 1984 del Ministerio de Sanidad y consumo por la que se regula la obligatoriedad del informe de alta. BOE 221. de 14 septiembre de 1984:26685–26686. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Departamento de Sanidad y Seguridad Social Orden del 23 de noviembre de 1990, de regulación del informe clínico del alta hospitalaria y el conjunto mínimo de datos de alta hospitalaria. DOGC 1379. 1990:5647–5648. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Geitung J.T., Kolstrup N., Fugelli P. Skriftlig. Writen information from hospital to prymari physician about discharged patients. Tidsskr nor Laegeforen. 1990;11:3132–3135. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sandler D., Heaton C., Garner S., Mitchell J. Patients and general practioner satisfaction with information given on discharge from hospital: audit of a new information card. Br Med J. 1989:1511–1513. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6714.1511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Criado-Montilla J., Ibáñez-Bermúdez F. Relaciones entre hospital y atención primaria. Experiencia de un servicio de medicina interna. Med Clin (Barc) 1996;106:463–468. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sardà N., Vilà R., Canela M., Jariod M., Masquè J. Análisis de la calidad y contenido del informe de alta hospitalaria. Med Clin (Bar) 1993;101:241–244. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sicras Mainar A., Navarro Artiedad R., Galobart Roca D. Complicaciones hospitalarias, su cumplimentación en el informe de alta y la hoja resumen de hospitalización. Med Clin (Bar) 1992;99:395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Irazábal Olabarrieta L., Gutiérrez B. ¿Funciona la comunicación entre los niveles primario y secundario? Aten Primaria. 1996;17:376–379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wagstaff R., Berlin A., Spencer J., Bhopal R.A. Information about patients deaths: general practicioners current practice and views on receiving a death register. Br J Gen Pract. 1994;44(384):315–316. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Anderson M.A., Helms L.B. Comunication between continuing care organizations. R Nurs Health. 1995;18(1):49–57. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770180107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schubiger G., Weber D., Winiker H., Desgrandchamps D., Imahorm P. Computersuported patient history: a workplace analysis. Scheiz Med Wochenschr. 1995;29125(17):841–845. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.McCormick I.R., Boyd M.A. Primary and secondary care integration. NZ Med J. 1994;26107(988):425–427. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Atencion Primaria are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES