Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2020 Nov 11;9:1243. Originally published 2020 Oct 15. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.26438.2

Case Report: Complete heart block as a manifestation of cardiac metastasis of oral cancer

Andrianto Andrianto 1,a, Eka Prasetya Budi Mulia 1, Denny Suwanto 1, Dita Aulia Rachmi 1, Mohammad Yogiarto 1
PMCID: PMC7682501  PMID: 33274052

Version Changes

Revised. Amendments from Version 1

We added a clearer definition of improvement in general condition; supportive treatment including dopamine use; and the reason of TPM extraction. We also added our suggestion of TPM use in such cases.

Abstract

Metastatic tumors of the heart presenting with complete heart block (CHB) is an extremely uncommon case. There are no available guidelines in managing CHB in terminal cancer. Permanent pacemaker implantation in such cases is a challenge in terms of clinical utility and palliative care.

We report a case of a 24-year-old man suffering from tongue cancer presenting with CHB. An intracardiac mass and moderate pericardial effusion were present, presumed as the metastatic tumor of tongue cancer. We implanted a temporary pacemaker for his symptomatic heart block and cardiogenic shock, and pericardiocentesis for his massive pericardial effusion. We decided that a permanent pacemaker would not be implanted based on the low survival rate and significant comorbidities.

Multiple studies report a variable number of cardiac metastasis incidence ranging from 2.3% to 18.3%. It is rare for such malignancies to present with CHB. The decision to implant a permanent pacemaker is highly specific based on the risks and benefits of each patient. It needs to be tailored to the patient’s functional status, comorbid diseases, prognosis, and response to conservative management.

Keywords: tongue cancer, cardiac metastasis, complete heart block, case report

Introduction

Cardiac metastasis is the least common presentation in malignant cancer. Primary cardiac tumors are also rare (on postmortem analysis, commonly between 0.01% to 0.1%). However, the frequency of secondary metastatic tumors to the pericardium, myocardium, great vessels, and coronary arteries are between 0.7% to 3.5% in the general population and up to 9.1% in patients with a history of malignancies 1.

Complete heart block (CHB) as the primary clinical presentation of heart metastasis is very unusual 2. There are currently no guidelines for the management of CHB in terminal stage of cancer.

We report a case of CHB caused by cardiac metastasis and review the literature to further help the management of our patient.

Case presentation

A 24-year old Asian man was admitted to the cardiology department with CHB and hypotension. The patient was a chef and had a history of tongue cancer for six months, and had undergone 30 cycles of radiotherapy. A week before, the patient came to the emergency department (ED) because of oral bleeding and general weakness. The patient denied any history of cardiovascular disease.

The patient was presented with chest discomfort and general weakness. He was hypotensive and bradycardic with a blood pressure of 80/40 mmHg, regular heart rate of 44 beats per minute, respiratory rate of 18 breaths per minute, and oxygen saturation of 97% on room air. Chest auscultation was clear, and no murmurs heard. Electrocardiogram showed CHB with a junctional escape rhythm at 44 bpm ( Figure 1). Echocardiography showed normal left ventricle kinetic, normal left ventricular ejection fraction (62%), and normal right ventricle systolic function. There were moderate pericardial effusion and intracardiac masses (2.1 × 0.9 cm and 1.8 × 0.8 cm) in the right atrial and septal leaflet of tricuspid. Hyperechoic areas in the annulus of tricuspid, lateral wall of right atrium and right ventricle, and interventricular septum were also found in an echocardiogram ( Figure 2 and Figure 3). Laboratory finding revealed anemia (hemoglobin 8.5 g/dL; normal range 13.3-16.6 g/dL), leukocytosis (white blood count 18,470/mL; normal range 3,370-10,000/mL), hypoalbuminemia (albumin 2.6 g/dL; normal range 3.4-5.0 g/dL), hypokalemia (potassium 3.4 mmol/L; normal range 3.5-5.1 mmol/L), and hypercalcemia (calcium 16.2 mg/dL, corrected calcium 16.9 mg/dL; normal range 8.6-10.3 mg/dL).

Figure 1. Electrocardiography on the first day of consultation showed complete heart block.

Figure 1.

Figure 2. Echocardiography showed the presence of a mass in the right atrium and septal leaflet of tricuspid (yellow arrow).

Figure 2.

Hyperechoic areas were found in the annulus of tricuspid, lateral wall of right atrium and right ventricle, and interventricular septum (red arrows).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Pericardial effusion was found in ( A) anterior, posterior, ( B) inferior, ( C) base, and ( D) left-lateral of the heart.

Previous magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of head and neck, six months before this admission, revealed malignant tongue mass (staging AJCC 2010 of lip and oral cavity mass: T4N1Mx) and bilateral nasal cavity thickening. Multi-slice computed tomography (CT) scan of the head revealed an enhancing mass 1×1.3×1.5 cm at the base of the tongue and multiple lymph node enlargements subcentimeter in the upper and lower paratracheal. Histopathology examination of tongue biopsy confirmed poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma.

A temporary pacemaker was immediately implanted as the patient showed symptomatic heart block and cardiogenic shock. After general supportive treatment, including intravenous dopamine administration, electrolyte imbalance correction, supportive treatment of general weakness condition, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and infection, the patient showed improvement in general condition. No hemodynamic instability was observed when temporary pacemaker was turned off. However, the CHB persisted despite electrolyte imbalance correction.

Multidiscipline team discussions involving electrophysiologist, otolaryngologist, and internist, resulted in decision to focus more on palliative care for this patient. Considering the poor prognosis of this cancer, risk of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, and severe comorbidities, we decided not to implant a PPM after acquiring the patient’s and his family’s consent.

Considering the risk of infection in prolong use of temporary pacemaker, on the 7 th day the temporary pacemaker was extracted.

On the 14 th day of admission, the patient developed pleural effusion, and worsening pericardial effusion with echocardiogram showed massive pericardial effusion and sign of tamponade. Further chest X-ray evaluation on the 14 th day showed left parahilar ground glass appearance with suspicions of lung metastasis and pleural effusion ( Figure 4). Pericardiocentesis was then performed with pericardial fluid showing hemorrhagic typical for malignant disease.

Figure 4. Chest X-ray on the 14 th day of treatment showed left parahilar ground glass appearance with suspicion of lung metastasis and pleural effusion.

Figure 4.

Pericardial fluid pigtail was already inserted for drainage of pericardial effusion.

The patient died due to respiratory failure and septic shock 20 days after showing the first symptoms of cardiac metastasis.

Discussion

From the literature, we acquired a total of 14 articles regarding heart block as a manifestation of cardiac metastasis, as summarized in Table 1 215. Oral cavity, uterus, and thyroid are the most common primary cancers that metastasize to the heart. Squamous cell carcinoma was the primary histologic finding. Heart metastasize may be present with clinically silent symptoms to an alarming presentation of hemoptysis and syncope. Locations of metastasis were mostly in the right ventricle, supporting the hypothesis of the hematologic spread of cancer cells. PPM implantation was performed in 10 cases, yet only one case reported a significant lifespan after PPM implantation.

Table 1. Literature review of case reports regarding heart block caused by cardiac metastasis.

Article Age
(years)
Primary site
of cancer
Type of cancer
cell
Location
of cardiac
metastasis
Sign /
symptoms
ECG findings Other cardiac
manifestation
PPM
implantation
Type of PPM Reversibility
of heart
block
Treatment of
cardiac metastasis
Diagnostic
tools to
detect cardiac
metastasis
Lifespan
after cardiac
manifestation
Buckberg
and Fowler,
1961 3
42 bronchogenic
carcinoma
adeno carcinoma interventricular
septum,
anterior wall of
left ventricle
shortness of
breath, cough
with blood
complete heart
block
intracardiac
mass
no No no none postmortem
autopsy
6 weeks
Clifford
et al., 2003 8
64 lymph follicular small
cell cleaved
lymphoma
interventricular
septum and RV
anterior wall
nausea,
diaphoresis,
and dizziness
complete heart
block with a
ventricular
escape
RV mass yes dual chamber yes chemotherapy echocardiogram 2 years, still
alive
Mocini
et al., 2005 9
44 lung malignant
neoplasm
interventricular
septum, left
ventricular wall
syncope complete heart
block
mild pericardial
effusion
yes dual chamber no none postmortem
autopsy
3 days
Ferraz
et al.,
2006 10
63 uterus squamous cell
carcinoma
interventricular
septum and RV
fatigue and
dyspnea on
mild exertion
complete heart
block
pericardial
effusion, RV
mass
yes permanent
atrioventricular
epimyocardial
pacemaker
no surgery for RV mass echocardiogram,
CT
4 months
Ozyuncu
et al.,
2006 11
56 right thigh malignant
melanoma
interventricular,
interatrial
septum
nausea,
vomiting,
presyncope
complete heart
block
mitral
regurgitation,
pericardial
effusion
yes VDD no chemo-
immunotherapy
CT thorax,
echocardiogram
2 months, still
alive
Knowles
et al.,
2007 12
42 right
maxillary
sinus
right
maxillary
sinus
not stated syncope complete heart
block with a
ventricular
escape
pericardial
effusion
no no yes chemotherapy echocardiogram,
CT
1 year
Rathi et al.,
2008 13
67 skin malignant
melanoma
all myocardial
walls
asymptomatic complete heart
block,
junctional
escape
pericardial
effusion
no no intermittent
complete
heart block
chemotherapy echocardiogram,
MRI
not stated
Lin et al.,
2015 14
74 thyroid papillary thyroid
carcinoma
RVOT exertional
dyspnea and
palpitations
first-degree
atrioventricular
block
and
subsequently
a new
intermittent
complete
atrioventricular
block
RVOT mass yes not stated no none CTA, C MRI,
PET Scan
not stated
(not long after
discharge)
Yoneda
et al.,
2016 15
53 gingival squamous cell
carcinoma
atrial septum,
left ventricle,
AV node
cough, syncope complete
heart block,
ventricular
fibrillation
none no No no chemotherapy postmortem
autopsy
4 weeks
Park et al.,
2016 4
54 right leg leiomyosarcoma interventricular
septum
dizziness and
dyspnea
complete heart
block and
idioventricular
escaped
rhythm of
bifascicular
block
morphology
VT,
intraventricular
mass
yes dual chamber no palliative
chemotherapy
MRI 3 months
Yoshihiro
et al., 2017 5
57 thyroid squamous cell
carcinoma
interventricular
septum
cough and
shortness of
breath
complete heart
block
RV mass yes not stated no chemoradiotherapy FDG-PET 25 days
Kansai
et al., 2007 6
56 lung adenocarcinoma interventricular
septum
dull pain,
presyncope
complete heart
block
LV mass yes not stated no none echocardiogram,
CT, postmortem
autopsy
19 days
Kumar
et al., 2018 2
28 tongue squamous cell
carcinoma
interventricular
septum
syncope complete heart
block
none yes not stated no none PET Scan 5 days
Cho et al.,
2018 7
70 oral cavity squamous cell
carcinoma
interventricular
septum
dizziness complete heart
block with a
ventricular
escape
none yes DDD no palliative
chemotherapy
FDG PET not stated

The prevalence of cardiac metastasis, in general, is arguably low. However, multiple studies reported a variable number of cardiac metastasis incidence ranging from 2.3% to 18.3%. The prevalence of malignancy originating from the oral cavity was 5.3%. The involvement of pericardium made up two-thirds of all cardiac metastasis. Myocardium and endocardium involvement each made up one-third of all cardiac metastasis. Only 5% involved the endocardium. The most common site of metastasis for squamous cell carcinomas is epicardium (41.4%) 16.

Myocardial infiltration by cancer cells may present with arrhythmias, such as atrial flutter or fibrillation, premature beats, or ventricular arrhythmias. Conduction system involvement may induce a various degree of atrioventricular blocks 16.

The presence of right atrial mass in our patient supports the possibility of hematologic spreading of metastatic cancer cells into the endocardium. Pericardial effusion may represent metastasize or inflammatory reaction toward the malignancy. The presence of CHB suggests the infiltration of the heart conduction system.

Valves are an uncommon site for metastasis because of the absence of vessels in the physiological valvular stroma and the constant cusp motion. Bussani et al. reported, out of over a thousand of post-mortem examination, there was only one case of valve involvement 16. The mass in the septal leaflet of tricuspid valves appeared in echocardiography examination in this patient showed valve involvement of cardiac metastasis.

Asymptomatic in the early stages, cardiac metastasis could lead to a wide range of signs and symptoms, such as cardiac failure, conduction disturbances, angina, and pain as it progresses. Disruption of the cardiac conduction system by cardiac metastases can lead to lethal arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response, CHB, or ventricular fibrillation 1. From the literature, we acquired 14 cases reporting CHB as a manifestation of cardiac metastasis originating from various malignancies, three of which are from the oral cavity.

Cardiac masses in our case presented with features favoring tumor, such as echo density similar to myocardium, normal wall motion, valvular lesion, no history suggestive of coronary artery disease, and a clinical history of oral cancer as primary site suspected to metastasize to the heart.

Cardiac MRI is the best imaging modality and, along with positron emission tomography scanning, are mostly used in investigating the extent of infiltration by malignant cells 2, 17. Patients with specific cardiac devices, such as pacemaker and defibrillators, would be disqualified from undergoing MRI, an important consideration given the frequency at which arrhythmia complicates cardiac metastasis 17. The temporary pacemaker implanted during the early stages of CHB made MRI impractical for our patient.

In our patient, CHB was initially thought to be the result of electrolyte imbalance. However, as the electrolyte was restored to its normal level without any improvement of CHB, it suggested that CHB was caused by infiltration of the metastatic cell to the conduction system of the heart. The presence of hemorrhagic pericardial effusion supports the suggestion of pericardial metastasis. Regardless of the lack of histological confirmation, we suggest that this case was cardiac metastasis diagnosed antemortem.

Predominantly, after a reversible or transient cause of bradycardia is excluded, cardiac pacing indication is decided by bradycardia severity instead of its etiology. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines state that some types of persistent bradycardia require permanent pacing. In acquired AV block, pacing is indicated in patients with second-degree type 2 or third-degree AV block regardless of symptoms (class I) 18. Similar to the ESC guidelines, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society guidelines also state that patients with transient or reversible causes of AV block should receive medical and supportive treatment if necessary, including temporary transvenous pacing, prior to confirmation of the need for permanent pacing (class of Recommendation/COR I). In addition, for patients with acquired CHB not associated with physiologic or reversible etiology, permanent pacing is recommended regardless of symptoms (COR I) 19.

In our case, we assume that the CHB was persistent after trying to correct possible external causes, such as hypercalcemia and hypokalemia, and after a sufficient waiting period. Moreover, it is still also unknown whether CHB would resolve after cancer treatment 2, 20. Our literature review showed that there are only two cases of metastatic CHB that are reversible after undergoing chemotherapy for cardiac metastasis 8, 12, while several other cases showed that CHB is irreversible 27, 911, 1315. The short life expectancy in patients with metastatic CHB also makes it difficult to follow up on CHB reversibility. Our literature review showed only one metastatic CHB case reported a significant lifespan more than two years after PPM implantation 8, while other cases reported a lifespan of no longer than one year 27, 915.

Our patient was expected to continue the radiotherapy cycle. Radiotherapy (RT) itself can induce pacemaker malfunction. Software impairments are the primary manifestation of malfunction during RT. This will perhaps lead to pacemaker reset, leaving only device basic function. Radiation dosage appears to contribute less to inducing pacemaker malfunctions than the beam energy of the RT 21.

For patients with indications for permanent pacing but accompanied with significant comorbidities or who are anticipated having a shortened lifespan because of terminal progressive illness, the implantation of a PPM should not be performed if it is unlikely to deliver significant clinical benefits or if it hinders the main therapy for the patient’s goal of care. Even though pacemaker implantation risks are rather low, the risk-benefit ratio is not favorable if the possible benefit is also quite low 19. Thus, after discussing with our patient and his family, we decided not to implant a PPM after acquiring the patient’s and his family’s consent.

Conclusion

CHB in a patient with oral cancer should increase the physician's suspicion of cardiac metastasis. It is rare for such malignancies to present with CHB. Temporary pacemaker should be considered for patients presenting with CHB and unstable hemodynamic before deciding permanent pacemaker implantation. The decision to implant a permanent pacemaker is highly specific based on the risks and benefits of each patient. It needs to be tailored to the patient’s functional status, comorbid diseases, prognosis, and response to conservative management. Even though the pacemaker implantation risks are rather low, the risk-benefit ratio is not favorable if the possible benefit is also quite low. A permanent pacemaker was not implanted in our patient because of the poor prognosis, severe comorbidities, and low expected lifespan.

Consent

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and/or clinical images was obtained from the patient’s parent.

Data availability

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

References

  • 1. Goldberg AD, Blankstein R, Padera RF, et al. : Tumors Metastatic to the Heart. Circulation. 2014;128(16):1790–1794. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000790 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kumar D, Mankame P, Sabnis G, et al. : A case report: metastatic complete heart block. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2018;2(4):yty131. 10.1093/ehjcr/yty131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Buckberg GD, Fowler NO: Complete Atrioventricular Block due to Cardiac Metastasis of Bronchogenic Carcinoma. Circulation. 1961;24:657–661. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Park YM, Shin JO, Kim M, et al. : Cardiac metastasis of leiomyosarcoma complicated with complete atrio-ventricular block and ventricular tachycardia. Korean Circ J. 2016;46(2):260–263. 10.4070/kcj.2016.46.2.260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Yoshihiro T, Tsuchihashi K, Kusaba H, et al. : Cardiac metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma of the thyroid gland with severe disseminated intravascular coagulation: A case report. Mol Clin Oncol. 2017;6(1):91–95. 10.3892/mco.2016.1091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kasai T, Kishi K, Kawabata M, et al. : Cardiac metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma causing atrioventricular block and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Chest. 2007;131(5):1569–1572. 10.1378/chest.06-1904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Cho JY, Kim KH, Park H, et al. : Complete atrioventricular block as an initial manifestation of recurred oral cavity cancer : a case report. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018;18(1):142. 10.1186/s12872-018-0876-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Clifford SM, Guerra SM, Mangion JR: Massive metastatic intracardiac lymphoma presenting with complete heart block with resolution following chemotherapy. Echocardiography. 2003;20(2):201–202. 10.1046/j.1540-8175.2003.03001.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mocini D, Longo R, Colivicchi F, et al. : A complete atrioventricular block secondary to myocardial metastases of lung cancer . A case report. Ital Hear J. 2005;6(11):931–932. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ferraz JGG, Martins ALM, De Souza JF, et al. : Metastatic Tumor of Squamous Cell Carcinoma From Uterine Cervix to Heart: Ante-Mortem Diagnosis. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2006;87(4):e104–7. 10.1590/s0066-782x2006001700025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ozyuncu N, Sahin M, Altin T, et al. : Cardiac metastasis of malignant melanoma : a rare cause of complete atrioventricular block. Europace. 2006;8(7):545–548. 10.1093/europace/eul058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Knowles JW, Elliott AB, Brody J: A case of complete heart block reverting to normal sinus rhythm after treatment for cardiac invasive Burkitt’s lymphoma. Ann Hematol. 2007;86(9):687–690. 10.1007/s00277-007-0290-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Rathi VK, Williams RB, Yamrozik J, et al. : Cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the charcoal heart. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008;10(1):37. 10.1186/1532-429X-10-37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Lin CK, Cochet A, Lewi JE: Complete Heart Block in a Patient With Metastatic Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Fed Pract. 2015;32(1):34–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Yoneda T, Kase K, Amino Y, et al. : A case of gingival cancer with pulmonary metastases that developed complete atrioventricular block and ventricular fibrillation as a result of myocardial metastases. Clin Case Rep. 2016;4(12):1075–1081. 10.1002/ccr3.695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Bussani R, Abbate A, Silvestri F: Cardiac metastases. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60(1):27–34. 10.1136/jcp.2005.035105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Lichtenberger JP, Reynolds DA, Keung J, et al. : Metastasis to the Heart: A Radiologic Approach to Diagnosis With Pathologic Correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;207(4):764–772. 10.2214/AJR.16.16148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, et al. : 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2014;67(1):58. 10.1016/j.rec.2013.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, et al. : 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2019;140(8):e382–e482. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Fotouhi Ghiam A, Dawson LA, Abuzeid W, et al. : Role of palliative radiotherapy in the management of mural cardiac metastases: who when and how to treat? A case series of 10 patients. Cancer Med. 2016;5(6):989–996. 10.1002/cam4.619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Zaremba T, Jakobsen AR, Søgaard M, et al. : Radiotherapy in patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: A literature review. Europace. 2016;18(4):479–491. 10.1093/europace/euv135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2020 Nov 19. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.30564.r74285

Reviewer response for version 2

Pieter AFM Doevendans 1

General 

Interesting case report, there are only text and grammar issues. Well written, with supporting images. The case deals with a young adult treated for oral carcinoma who developed a symptomatic total AV block. The block persisted after restoration of the electrolyte dysbalance and is due to local tumour growth based on metatstasis. A conservative approach is chosen after balancing pros and cons of permanent pacemaker therapy. 

In the discussion it would be nice to explain why no histology on pericardial fluid was performed. Maybe because of lack of any consequences for the patient or the treatment. 

Textual corrections in detail for the authors:

Masses in the right atrium and septal leaflet of the tricuspid valve.

Showing hemorrhagic fluid

Heart metastasis may be present without symptoms (silent) or show alarming symptoms .... 

PE may represent pericarditis carcinomatosa or inflammatory reaction. 

Post mortem examinations 

metastatic cells

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Yes

Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?

Yes

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Yes

Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Cardiology.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2020 Nov 19. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.30564.r74597

Reviewer response for version 2

Radityo Prakoso 1

I think the author has revised all the suggestions and there is nothing more to be fixed from my point of view.

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Yes

Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?

Partly

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Partly

Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2020 Oct 27. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.29188.r73101

Reviewer response for version 1

Radityo Prakoso 1

Some typos and grammars should be evaluated. In the presentation, what does author mean about "improvement"? Why did TPM extracted by improvement but the complete heart block was actually not improving? I mean its 7th days were they sure that the worsening condition not due to the low cardiac output because of too low of heart rate? Maybe the author could add some suggestions of using medication to increase heart rate if there were significant reasons to "must take" the TPM?

Conclusion

So what does the author advise if one day there were similar patients came with complete heart block? Should the author suggest to implant the TPM or maybe using medication to increase the heart rate, such as sympathomimetic amines.

Are enough details provided of any physical examination and diagnostic tests, treatment given and outcomes?

Yes

Is the case presented with sufficient detail to be useful for other practitioners?

Partly

Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

Partly

Is the background of the case’s history and progression described in sufficient detail?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2020 Oct 31.
Andrianto Andrianto 1

Some typos and grammars should be evaluated. In the presentation, what does author mean about "improvement"? Why did TPM extracted by improvement but the complete heart block was actually not improving? I mean its 7th days were they sure that the worsening condition not due to the low cardiac output because of too low of heart rate? Maybe the author could add some suggestions of using medication to increase heart rate if there were significant reasons to "must take" the TPM?

Answer: Thank you for your comment. We have revised come typos and grammar. We also added a clearer definition in general condition, supportive treatment including dopamine use, and reason the TPM was extracted in section case presentation paragraf 4-6.

Conclusion

So what does the author advise if one day there were similar patients came with complete heart block? Should the author suggest to implant the TPM or maybe using medication to increase the heart rate, such as sympathomimetic amines.

Answer: Thank you for your comment. We have added our suggestion of TPM use in such cases in section conclusion paragraf 1.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES