Skip to main content
Atencion Primaria logoLink to Atencion Primaria
. 2013 Apr 3;32(6):376–381. [Article in Spanish] doi: 10.1016/S0212-6567(03)79300-7

Dilemas y alternativas en la evaluación de la formación del médico de familia

JR Loayssa Lara 1,
PMCID: PMC7684402  PMID: 14572403

The content is available as a PDF (100.3 KB).

Bibliografía

  • 1.Kassiber J.P. Pseudoaccountability. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:587–590. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-7-200104030-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Van der Vleuten C. Validity of final examination in undergraduate medical training. Bmj. 2000;321:1217–1219. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7270.1217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brown S., Knight P. Assessing learners in higher education. Kogan Page; London: 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Davis D. Does CME workα An analysis of the effect of educational activities on physician performance or health care outcomes. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1998;28:21–39. doi: 10.2190/UA3R-JX9W-MHR5-RC81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cantillon P., Jones R. Does continuing medical education in general practice make a difference? Bmj. 1999;318:1276–1279. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7193.1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Salleres Sallas J., grupo de trabajo de la Semfyc . Evaluación de la competencia. Reto o necesidad. Documentos Semfyc n°. 18. EdiDe; Barcelona: 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lechner SK. Evaluation of Teaching and Learning Strategies. Med Educ Online 2001;6:4.http://www.meded-online.org [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 8.Monreal Hijar A. Situación actual y futura de la evaluación de los residentes de medicina familiar y comunitaria. Tribuna Docente en Medicina de Familia. 2001;2:9–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Langsley D.G. Evaluation during residency. In: Lloyd J.S., Langley D.G., editors. How to evaluate residents. American Board of Medical Specialities; Chicago: 1986. pp. 11–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Quattlebaum T.G. Techniques for Evaluating Residents and Residency Programs. Pediatrics. 1996;98:1277–1283. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Peabody F.W. Landmark article, March 19, 1927: The care of the patient. By Francis W. Peabody. Jama. 1984;252:813–818. doi: 10.1001/jama.252.6.813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Brailovsky C.A., Miller F. La competencia clínica y su evaluación. In: Cots Yago J.M., editor. Guía de formación médica y competencia profesional en atención primaria. SemFYC; Barcelona: 2002. pp. 143–156. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Epstein R.M., Hundert E.M. Defining and assessing professsional competence. Defining and assessing professsional competence. 2002;287:226–235. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.2.226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Swanson D.B., Norcini J.J., Grosso L.J. Assessment of clinical competence: written and computer-based simulations. Assess Eval Higher Educ. 1987;12:220–246. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Miller G.E. The assessment of clinicalskills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65:S63–S67. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kane M. The assessment of professional competence. Evaluation and the health professions. 1992;5:163–182. doi: 10.1177/016327879201500203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wolf A. Competence based assessmen. Open University; Milton Keynes: 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tamblyn R., Abrahamowicz M., Brailovsky C., Grand'Maison P., Lescop J., Norcini J. Association between licensing examination scores and resource use and quality of care in primary care practice. Jama. 1998;280:989–996. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.11.989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ramsey P.G., Wenrich M.D., Carline J.D., Inui T.S., Larson E.B., LoGerfo J.P. Use of peer-ratings to evaluate Physician Performance. Jama. 1993;269:1655–1660. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fowell S.L., Bligh J.G. Recent Developments in Assessing Medical Students. Postgrad Med J. 1998;74:18–24. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.74.867.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Smith R.M. Triple-jump examination as an assessment tool in the problem-based medical curriculum at the university of Hawaii. Acad Med. 1993;168:366–372. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199305000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Charlin B., Leduc C., Brailovsky C.A., Blouin D., Hivon R. The Diagnostic Schema Questionnaire: A new tool to Assess a Specific Dimension of Clinical Competence. In: Scherpbier A.J., Van der Vleuten J.J., Rethans J.J.J., Van der Steeg A.F., editors. Advances in medical education. Kluwer Academic Publishers; Dordrecht: 1997. pp. 354–356. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Charlin B., Roy L., Brailovsky C., Goulet F., Van der Vleuten C. The Script Concordance test: a tool to assess the reflective clinician. Teach Learn Med. 2000;12:189–195. doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1204_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jennett P. Chart stimulated recall, a technique to assess clinical competence and performance. Educ Gen Pract. 1995;6:30–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Petrusa E.R., Brackell T.A., Amsworth M.A. Reliability and Validity of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination for assessing the clinical. performance of residents. 1990;150:573–577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Colliver J.A., Swartz M.N. Assessing Clinical performance with standardised patients. Jama. 1997;278:790–791. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.9.790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mavis B.E., Henry R.C., Ogle K.S., Hoppe R.B. The Emperor's New Clothes: The SCE Reassessed. Acad Med. 1996;71:447–453. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199605000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Singer P.A., Robb A., Cohen R., Norman G., Turnbull J. Performance-based assessment of clinical ethics using an objective structured clinical examination. Acad Med. 1995;70:889–931. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199605000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cohen R. Assessing professional behavior and medical error. Med Teach. 2001;23:145–151. doi: 10.1080/01421590120036556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Harden R.M., Gleeson F.A. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) Med Educ. 1979;13:41–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Van der Vleuten C. Validity of Final examination in undergraduate medical training. Bmj. 2000;321:1217–1219. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7270.1217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Grosswald S.J. Problem solving strategies of experienced and novice physicians. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 1992;12:205–213. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Newble D., Swanson D. Psychometric Characteristics of the Objetive Structured Clinical Examination. Med Educ. 1988;22:325–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1988.tb00761.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hodges B., Turnbull J., Cohen R., Bienstock A., Norman G. Evaluating communication skills in the objective structured clinical examination format: reliability and generalizability. Med Educ. 1996;30:38–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1996.tb00715.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kinderman P., Humphris G. Clinical communication skills teaching: the role of cognitive schemata. Med Educ. 1995;29:436–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1995.tb02868.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Whitcomb M.E. Fostering and Evaluating Professionalism in Medical Education. Acad Med. 2002;77:473–474. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pangaro L. Investing in descriptive evaluation: a vision of the future of assessment. Med Teach. 2000;22:478–481. doi: 10.1080/01421590050110740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rowland-Morin P.A., Burchard K.W., Garb J.L., Coe N.P. Influence of effective communication by surgery students on their oral examination scores. Acad Med. 1991;66:169–171. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199103000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hunt D.D. Functional and dysfunctional characteristics of the prevailing model of clinical evaluation systems in North America medical Schools. Acad Med. 1992;67:254–259. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199204000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gray J.D. Global rating scales in residency education. Acad Med. 1996;71:55S–63S. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199601000-00043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Burack J.H., Irby D.M., Carline J.D., Root R.K., Larson E.B. Teaching compassion and respect: attending physicians' responses to problematic behaviours. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:49–55. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00280.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hull A.L., Hodder S., Berger B., Ginsberg D., Lindheim N., Quan J. Validity of three clinical performance assessments of internal medicine clerks. Acad Med. 1995;70:517–522. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199506000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Brennan B., Norman G.R. Use of encounter cards for evaluation of residents in obstetrics. Acad Med. 1997;72:43S–44S. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199710001-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hemmer P.A., Hawkins R., Jackson J.L., Pangaro L.N. Assessing how well three evaluation methods detect deficiencies in medical students' professionalism in Two Settings of an internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med. 2000;75:167–173. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200002000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Regerd G., McRae H., Reznick R., Szalay D. Comparing psychometric properties of checklist and global ratings scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination. Acad Med. 1998;73:993–997. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199809000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Battistone M.J., Pendleton B., Milne C., Battistone M.A., Sande M.A., Hemmer P.A. Acad. Med. 2001;76:105S–107S. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200110001-00035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hemmer P., Pangaro L. Using Formal Evaluation Sessions for Case-based Faculty Development during Clinical Clerkships. Acad Med. 2000;75:1216–1221. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200012000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Littlefield J., Paukert J., Shoolfield J. Quality Assurance Data for Residents' Global Performance Ratings. Acad Med. 2001;76:S102–S104. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200110001-00034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mcleod P.J., Tamblym R., Beneroya S., She L. Faculty Ratings of Residents humanism predict patient satisfaction ratings in ambulatory medical clinics. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:321–326. doi: 10.1007/BF02599179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Violato C., Marini A., Toews J., Lockyer J., Fidler H. Feasibility and psychometric properties of using peers, consulting physicians, co-workers, and patients to assess physicians. Acad Med. 1997;72:82S–84S. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199710001-00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Challis M. Portfolios and assessment: meeting the challenge. Med Teach. 2001;23:437–440. doi: 10.1080/01421590120075643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Shomaker T.S., Betz A.L. The University of Utah School of Medicine. Acad Med. 2000;75:375S–378S. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200009001-00111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Campbell L.M., Murray T.S. Assessment of competence. Br J Gen Pract. 1996;46:619–622. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ram P., Grol R., Rethans J.J., Schouten q B., Van der Vleuten C., Kester A. Assessment of general practitioners by video observation of communicative and medical performance in daily practice: issues of validity, reliability and feasibility. Med Educ. 1999;33:447–454. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00348.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Martín Zurro A. Diversificación metodológica de la evaluación de la competencia del médico de familia. Jano. 2002;42:1350–1351. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Albanese M. Ratings Educational Quality: factors in the erosion of professional standards. Acad Med. 1999;74:652–658. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199906000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Whitcomb M.E. Competency-based graduate medical educationα Of course! But how should competency be assessed. Acad Med. 2002;77:359–360. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200205000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lough J.R.M., McKay J., Murray T.S. Audit in summative assessment a criteria marked schedule. Br J Gen Pract. 1995;45:607–609. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gómez Gascón T. Evaluación de la competencia. Jano. 2002;42:1346–1347. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Skinner B.D., Newton W.P., Curtis P. The educational value of an OSCE in a family practice residency. Acad Med. 1997;72:722–724. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199708000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Blay C., Decarrega R., Iruela E., Kronfly E., Barragan N., Serrallach S. Evaluación de la competencia profesional de los médicos. Cuadernos de Gestión. 1997;3:68–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Woodward C.A. Problem based learning in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ. 1996;12:83–94. doi: 10.1007/BF00596231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Woodward C.A., Lockie C. Examination for membership in the Royal College of General Practitioners. Occasional Paper 46. Royal College of General Practitioners; London: 1990. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Rowntree D. Educational technology in curriculum development. Teachers College Pr; Londres: 1986. Evaluation and improvement. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Atencion Primaria are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES