Abstract
Objetivo
Evaluar la eficacia de la metformina frente a placebo, dieta, antidiabéticos orales o insulina en la diabetes mellitus tipo 2.
Diseño
Revisión sistemática.
Fuentes de datos
MEDLINE (1966-2003), EMBASE (1974-2003), LILACS (1986-2003), Cochrane library (Issue 3, 2003).
Selección de estudios
Se seleccionaron 29 ensayos clínicos aleatorizados de metformina en monoterapia, con resultados sobre mortalidad, morbilidad y bioquímica.
Extracción de datos
Programa informático RevMan 4. Dos revisores extrajeron los datos y evaluaron la calidad. Variables principales: cualquier acontecimiento clínico relacionado con la diabetes (mortalidad, coronariopatía, ictus, nefropatía, arteriopatía y retinopatía). Variables secundarias: peso y bioquímica.
Resultados
Se analizaron 29 ensayos clínicos con 37 comparaciones de metformina (13 con sulfonilureas, 12 con placebo, 3 con dieta, 3 con tiazolidindionas, 2 con inhibidores de la α-glucosidasa, 2 con insulina y 2 con meglitinidas). La metformina mostró mayor beneficio que las sulfonilureas o la insulina para cualquier acontecimiento clínico relacionado con la diabetes (riesgo relativo = 0,78; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 0,65 a 0,94) y que la dieta (riesgo relativo = 0,74; IC del 95%, 0,60 a 0,90). La metformina disminuyó la hemoglobina A1 glucosilada (diferencia media ponderada: −1,21%; IC del 95%, −1,48 a −0,94), colesterol unido a lipoproteínas de baja densidad (diferencia media ponderada: −0,24; IC del 95%, −0,40 a −0,09) y peso (diferencia media estandarizada: −0,11; IC del 95%, −0,18 a −0,04). La metformina presentó mayor beneficio que el placebo, la dieta o las tiazolidindionas en la hemoglobina A1 glucosilada, y que las sulfonilureas o la insulina en el peso.
Conclusiones
A largo plazo la metformina disminuye el riesgo de acontecimientos clínicos relacionados con la diabetes. No existen ensayos clínicos a largo plazo que comparen con metformina los inhibidores de la α-glucosidasa, meglitinidas y tiazolidindionas, en resultados primarios. Las diferentes intervenciones comparadas con metformina no obtuvieron más beneficio para los resulta dos secundarios evaluados.
Palabras clave: Metformina, Biguanidas, Diabetes mellitus tipo 2, Revisión sistemática, Metaanálisis
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the efficacy of metformin against placebo, diet, oral antidiabetics, or insulin in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Design
Systematic review.
Data sources
MEDLINE (1966-2003), EMBASE (1974-2003), LILACS (1986- 2003), Cochrane library (Issue 3, 2003).
Selection of studies
29 randomized clinical trials of metformin in monotherapy, with results on mortality, morbility, and biochemistry.
Extraction of data
RevMan 4 computer program. Two reviewers extracted the data and evaluated the quality. Main variables: any clinical event related to diabetes (mortality, coronary disease, stroke, arterial disease, and retinopathy). Secondary variables: weight and biochemistry.
Results
29 clinical studies with 37 comparisons of metformin were analyzed (13 with sulphonylureas, 12 with placebo, 3 with diet, 3 with thiazolidinediones, 2 with α-glucosidase inhibitors, 2 with insulin, and 2 with meglitinides). Metformin was more beneficial than the sulphonylureas or insulin for any clinical event associated with diabetes (relative risk [RR]=0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.94) and than diet (RR=0.74; 95% CI, 0.60-0,90). Metformin decreased glycosylated hemoglobin A1 (weighted mean difference, -1.21%; 95% CI, −1.48 to −0.94), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (weighted mean difference, −0.24; 95% CI, −0.40 to −0.09), and weight (standardized mean difference, −0.11; 95% CI, −0.18 to −0.04). Metformin was more beneficial than the placebo, diet or the thiazolidinediones on glycosylated hemoglobin A1, and than the sulphonylureas or insulin on weight.
Conclusions
In the long term metformin reduces the risks of clinical events associated with diabetes. There are no long term clinical trials which compare α-glucosidase inhibitors, meglitinides, and thiazolidinediones with metformin, in primary results. The different treatments compared with metformin did not obtain more benefit for the secondary results evaluated.
Key words: Metformin, Biguanides, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Systematic review, Metaanalyses
Footnotes
Farma Roche obtuvo para nosotros los textos completos de las referencias potencialmente relevantes. La Agencia Laín Entralgo de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid realizó para nosotros una actualización de la búsqueda bibliográfica. La Colaboración Cochrane Iberoamericana nos ayudó en el estudio estadístico. En 2002 el Dr. Sáenz recibió un premio a la investigación financiado por Novartis. La revisión completa se puede consultar en la colaboración Cochrane 2005 (issue 3).
Bibliografía
- 1.Richter B., Berger M., Bergerhoff K., Clar C., De Leiva A., Manning P., Cochrane Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders Group . Update Software; Oxford: 2001. Cochrane Library, Issue 3. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bailey C.J., Turner R.C. Drug therapy: metformin. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:574–579. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199602293340906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Salpeter S., Greyber E., Pasternak G., Salpeter E. Cochrane Library, Issue 4. Update Software; Oxford: 2003. Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus (Cochrane Review) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Campbell I.W., Howlett H.C.S. Worldwide experience of metformin as an effective glucose-lowering agent: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Rev. 1995;11(Suppl 1):57–62. doi: 10.1002/dmr.5610110509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Johansen K. Efficacy of metformin in the treatment of NIDDM. Meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:33–37. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shaughnessy A.F., Slawson D.C. What happened to the valid POEMs? A survey of review articles on the treatment of type 2 diabetes. BMJ. 2003;327:266–269. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7409.266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jadad A.R., Moore R.A., Carroll D., Jenkinson C., Reynolds J.M., Gavaghan D.J. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1–12. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schulz K.F., Chalmers I., Hayes R.J., Altman D.G. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995;273:408–412. doi: 10.1001/jama.273.5.408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fleiss J.L. 2nd edition. Wiley; New York: 1981. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. p. 217-234. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Charpentier G., Fleury F., Kabir M., Vaur L., Halimi S. Improved glycaemic control by addition of glimepiride to metformin monotherapy in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Med. 2001;18:828–834. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2001.00582.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Goldstein B.J., Pans M., Rubin C.J. Multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group assessment of simultaneous glipizide/ metformin as second-line pharmacologic treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus that is inadequately controlled by a sulfonylurea. Clin Ther. 2003;25:890–903. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80112-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.DeFronzo R.A., Goodman A.M. Efficacy of metformin in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Multicenter Metformin Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:541–549. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199508313330902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hermann L.F., Schersten B., Bitzen P.O., Kjellstrom T., Lindgärde F., Melander A. Therapeutic comparison of metformin and sulfonylurea, alone and in various combinations. A double-blind controlled study. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:1100–1109. doi: 10.2337/diacare.17.10.1100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hoffmann J., Spengler M. Efficacy of 24-week monotherapy with acarbose, metformin, or placebo in dietary-treated NIDDM patients: the Essen-II Study. Am J Med. 1997;103:483–490. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00252-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chiasson J.L., Nadtich L., For the Miglitol Canadian University Investigator Group The synergistic effect of miglitol plus metformin combination therapy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:989–994. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.6.989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pavo I., Jermendy G., Varkonyi T.T., Kerenyi Z., Gyimesi A., Shoustov S. Effect of pioglitazone compared with metformin on glycemic control and indicators of insulin sensitivity in recently diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:1637–1645. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Uehara M.H. Metabolic and haemodynamic effects of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2001;3:319–325. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1326.2001.00136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Turner R.C., Holman R.R., Stratton I.M., Cull C.A., Matthews D.R., Manley S.E., For the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34) Lancet. 1998;352:854–865. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Collier A., Watson H.H., Patrick A.W., Ludlam C.A., Clarke B.F. Effect of glycaemic control, metformin and gliclazide on platelet density and aggregability in recently diagnosed type 2 (noninsulin-dependent) diabetic patients. Diabete Metab. 1989;15:420–425. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Noury J., Nandeuil A. Comparative three-month study of the efficacies of metformin and gliclazide in the treatment of NIDD. Diabete Metab. 1991;17(1 Pt 2):209–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tessier D., Maheux P., Khalil A., Fulop T. Effects of gliclazide versus metformin on the clinical profile and lipid peroxidation markers in type 2 diabetes. Metabolism. 1999;48:897–903. doi: 10.1016/s0026-0495(99)90226-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Campbell I.W., Menzis D.G., Chalmers J., McBain A.M., Brown I.RF. One year comparative trial of metformin and glipizide in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabete Metab. 1994;20:394–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Amador-Licona N., Guizar-Mendoza J., Vargas E., Sánchez-Camargo G., Zamora-Mata L. The short-term effect of a switch from glibenclamide to metformin on blood pressure and microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Med Res. 2000;31:571–575. doi: 10.1016/s0188-4409(00)00241-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Támez Pérez H.E., Gómez de Ossio M.D., Ibarra Martínez I.B. Normoglucemia en diabetes mellitus no dependiente de insulina de reciente diagnóstico. Tratamiento no farmacológico vs. tratamiento farmacológico. Med Int Mex. 1997;13:272–275. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dalzell G.W., Hadden D.R., Atkinson A.B., Kennedy L., Weavwe J.A. A randomized trial tolbutamide and metformin for persistent severe hyperglycaemia in non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) Irish J Med Sci. 1986;155:341–342. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Damsbo P., Hermann L.S., Vaag A., Hother-Nielsen O., Beck-Nielsen H. Irreversibility of the defect in glycogen synthase activity in skeletal muscle from obese patients with NIDDM treated with diet and metformin. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1489–1494. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.9.1489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Del Prato S., Erkelens D.W., Leutenegger M. Six-month efficacy of benfluorex vs. placebo or metformin in diet-failed type 2 diabetic patients. Acta Diabetol. 2003;40:20–27. doi: 10.1007/s005920300004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dornan T.L., Heller S.R., Peck G.M., Tattersall R.B. Double-blind evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of metformin in NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1991;14:342–344. doi: 10.2337/diacare.14.4.342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Grant P.J. The effects of high- and medium-dose metformin therapy on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type II diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:64–66. doi: 10.2337/diacare.19.1.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hallsten K., Virtanen K.A., Lonnqvist F., Sipila H., Oksanen A., Viljanen T. Rosiglitazone but not metformin enhances insulin- and exercise-stimulated skeletal muscle glucose uptake in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2002;51:3479–3485. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.12.3479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Horton E.S., Clinkingbeard C., Gatlin M., Foley J., Mallows S., Shen S. Nateglinide alone and in combination with metformin improves glycemic control by reducing mealtime glucose levels in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1660–1665. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.11.1660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lee A., Morley J.E. Metformin decreases food consumption and induces weight loss in subjects with obesity with type II non-insulin- dependent diabetes. Obes Res. 1998;6:47–53. doi: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1998.tb00314.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mather K.J., Verma S., Anderson T.J. Improved endothelial function with metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1344–1350. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01129-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Teupe B., Bergis K. Prospective randomized two-years clinical study comparing additional metformin treatment with reducing diet in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 1991;17:213–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Moses R., Slobodniuk R., Boyages S., Colagiuri S., Kidson W., Carter J. Effect of repaglinide addition to metformin monotherapy on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:119–124. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.1.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Inzucchi S.E., Maggs D.G., Spollett G.R., Page S.L., Rife F.S., Walton V. Efficacy and metabolic effects of metformin and troglitazone in type II diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:867–872. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199803263381303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fanghanel G., Sánchez-Reyes L., Trujillo C., Sotres D., Espinosa- Campos J. Metformin's effects on glucose and lipid metabolism in patients with secondary failure to sulfonylureas. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:1185–1189. doi: 10.2337/diacare.19.11.1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Begg C.B., Mazundar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088–1101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Egger M., Davey Smith G., Schneider M., Minder C. Bias in meta- analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–634. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Higgins J.P.T., Thompson S.G., Deeks J.J., Altman D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003;327:557–560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tosi F., Muggeo M., Brun E. Combination treatment with metformin and glibenclamide versus single-drug therapies in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized double-blind, comparative study. Metabolism. 2003;52:862–867. doi: 10.1016/s0026-0495(03)00101-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Buse J. Combinig insulin and oral agents. Am J Med. 2000;108(Suppl 6A):23–32. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00339-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mamputu J.C., Wiernsperger N.F., Renier G. Antiatherogenic properties of metformin: the experimental evidence. Diabetes Metab. 2003;290(4 Pt 2):6S71–16S. doi: 10.1016/s1262-3636(03)72790-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ. 1998;317:703–713. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
