Skip to main content
Cancer Science logoLink to Cancer Science
. 2012 Apr 11;103(6):1111–1120. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02254.x

Incidence of metachronous second primary cancers in Osaka, Japan: Update of analyses using population‐based cancer registry data

Takahiro Tabuchi 1,, Yuri Ito 1, Akiko Ioka 1, Isao Miyashiro 1, Hideaki Tsukuma 1
PMCID: PMC7685084  PMID: 22364479

Abstract

Cancer survivors are at excess risk of developing second primary cancers, but the precise level of risk in Japanese patients is not known. To investigate the risk of survivors developing second primary cancers, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Osaka Cancer Registry. The study subjects comprised all reported patients aged 0–79 years who were first diagnosed with cancer between 1985 and 2004 in Osaka and who survived for at least 3 months, followed‐up through to December 2005. A metachronous second primary cancer was defined as any invasive second cancer that was diagnosed between 3 months and 10 years after the first cancer diagnosis. The main outcome measures were incidence rates per 100 000 person‐years, cumulative risk and standardized incidence ratios (SIR) of second primary cancer. Metachronous second primary cancers developed in 13 385 of 355 966 survivors (3.8%) after a median follow‐up of 2.5 years. Sex‐specific incidence rates of metachronous second primary cancer per 100 000 person‐years increased with age, and were higher among men than women (except for the 0–49 years age group), but these rates did not differ over the study period. The 10‐year cumulative risk was estimated as 13.0% for those who first developed cancer at 60–69 years of age (16.2% for men, 8.6% for women). The SIR among those with first cancer diagnosed at 0–39 and 40–49 years of age were 2.13 and 1.52, respectively, in both sexes, whereas the SIR among cancers of the mouth/pharynx, esophagus and larynx were much higher than one as for site relationships. We showed that cancer survivors in Osaka, Japan, were at higher risk of second primary cancers compared with the general population. Our findings indicate that second primary cancers should be considered as a commonly encountered major medical problem. Further investigations are required to advance our understanding to enable the development of effective measures against multiple primary cancers. (Cancer Sci 2012; 103: 1111–1120)


Approximately 50% of men and 40% of women will develop a cancer during their lifetime,1 and half of all cancer patients in Japan will survive for at least 5 years.2 Because of the longer survival times for several forms of cancer and the aging of the population, it is estimated that 5–10% of all cancer patients develop a further, independent primary cancer.3, 4 A better understanding of multiple primary cancers should yield greater insights into the shared etiological factors and basic mechanisms of carcinogenesis and could thus provide a more sound basis for the management of cancer patients, including the development of protective measures.5

In a previous study using data from the Osaka Cancer Registry (2000 Census population; 8.8 million), one of the largest population‐based cancer registries in the world, we reported that 2.0% of cancer patients developed metachronous second primary cancer between 1966 and 1986.4 We also calculated the 10‐year cumulative risk for metachronous second primaries to be approximately 10% for those who developed their first cancer at 60–69 years of age between 1978 and 1983.4 However, investigations into trends or site combinations could not be completed owing to the short cancer registration period. In the present study, we updated the data for the incidence of metachronous second primary cancers in Osaka, Japan, according to sex, age groups, calendar year at diagnosis, primary cancer sites, and follow‐up interval. This was done not only to provide an insight into the etiology of cancer, but also to provide information for effective medical care by clinical oncologists.

Materials and Methods

Study subjects and definition of metachronous second primary cancer

The present study was designed as a retrospective cohort study. Individual case records were obtained from the Osaka Cancer Registry, which was founded in 1962 for the purpose of registering all malignant tumors and benign intracranial tumors arising in Osaka Prefecture.6 The study subjects were all reported patients aged 0–79 years in Osaka who were initially diagnosed as having a first primary cancer between 1985 and 2004 and had survived for at least 3 months. The incidence of second primary cancers among the study subjects was examined through to the end of 2005 for a maximum of 10 years after the first cancer diagnosis.

Metachronous second primary cancer was defined as any invasive second cancer that was diagnosed between 3 months and 10 years after diagnosis of the first cancer. In situ carcinomas, benign intracranial tumors, and any third or fourth (or more) primaries were excluded. Each cancer site was categorized into 16 selected major groups according to International Classification of Diseases Tenth Revision (ICD‐10)7, to analyze the cancer site relationships between first and second cancer. The ICD‐10 codes used in the present study are given as mouth/pharynx (C00‐14), esophagus (C15), stomach (C16), colorectum (C18‐20), liver (C22), gallbladder (C23, C24), pancreas (C25), larynx (C32), lung (C33, C34), breast (female) (C50), uterus (C53‐55), ovary (C56), prostate (C61), kidney/urinary tract/bladder (C64‐68), thyroid (C73) and blood (C81‐85, C88, C90, C91‐96).

Statistical analysis

To estimate the risk for second primary cancer, person‐years at risk were calculated as the time from 3 months after diagnosis of the first cancer until whichever of the following came first: (i) December 31, 2005; (ii) the date of diagnosis of the metachronous second primary cancer; (iii) the date of death; (iv) the date when a patient reached 80 years of age; or (v) the date 10 years after the diagnosis of the first cancer.8

The incidence rate per 100 000 person‐years and cumulative risk9 for metachronous second primary cancer were estimated according to sex, age group and calendar year at the time of diagnosis of the first cancer.

The observed number of metachronous second primary cancers was compared with the expected number according to sex, age group, selected site of the first and second cancer, and follow‐up interval. A standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was then obtained by dividing the observed number of cases of a second primary cancer by the expected number. Thus, the SIR is used to estimate the risk of a cancer patient developing a second primary malignancy compared with the incidence of cancer among the general population. In the analyses for site relationship between the first and second cancer, we report only the cancer site combinations where more than 10 eligible metachronous second primary cancers were obtained. The significance and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the SIR were tested by Poisson distribution analysis.

In Osaka, we used the rules suggested by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)10 and the third edition of the ICD‐O11 to define the circumstance under which an individual is considered to have more than one cancer. The IARC's definition does not accept any tumors in the same site as a second primary cancer unless their major histological type differs from that of the first primary cancer. Therefore, the SIR for all sites will be underestimated, particularly in the case of first cancers with high person‐years, such as cancer of the stomach, colorectum, liver, lung, and breast. To avoid such underestimations, we excluded both the observed and expected numbers of second primary cancer in the same site as the first cancer from the SIR calculations for all sites. Therefore, in the present study a second primary cancer of the same site (as defined by the three‐digit rubric of the ICD with some exceptions according to the rules) was excluded even if its histological type differed from that of the first primary cancer when we used the variable of cancer site in the analyses.8

Probability values for statistical tests were two‐tailed and P < 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

The total number of study subjects was 355 966, of whom 79.7% were histologically verified. During the follow‐up period (median follow‐up duration 2.5 years; mean 3.9 years), metachronous second primary cancers developed in 13 385 subjects (3.8%). Figure 1 shows age‐ and sex‐specific incidence rates of metachronous second primary cancers per 100 000 person‐years, in which study subjects were classified into four groups according to calendar year at diagnosis of the first cancer. The incidence rates increased remarkably with an increase in age and were higher among men than women, except in the 0–39 and 40–49 years age groups. In terms of calendar year at the time of diagnosis of the first cancer, age‐specific incidence rates did not differ within either sex.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Age‐specific incidence rates of metachronous second primary cancer per 100 000 person‐years in (a) men and (b) women according to the calendar year at diagnosis of the first cancer, Osaka, 1985–2004.

Table 1 shows the cumulative risks of metachronous second primary cancers according to age and calendar year at diagnosis of the first cancer. The 10‐year cumulative risk was estimated as 13.0% for those who developed their first cancer at 60–69 years of age (16.2% for men, 8.6% for women). No difference or increasing trend was observed during the study period.

Table 1.

Cumulative risk of metachronous second primary cancer (%), according to sex, age and calendar year at the time of diagnosis of the first cancer

Sex/age (years) Duration Year of diagnosis of first cancer
1985–1989 1990–1994 1995–1999 2000–2004 Total
Male
0–39 3 months–5 years 0.4 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.8
3 months–10 years 1.5 1.4 1.8 1.6
40–49 3 months–5 years 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.1
3 months–10 years 5.1 4.8 4.9 5.0
50–59 3 months–5 years 4.9 4.1 4.6 4.5 4.5
3 months–10 years 11.4 9.8 9.5 10.2
60–69 3 months–5 years 7.2 7.3 7.9 7.5 7.5
3 months–10 years 16.4 16.5 15.7 16.2
70–79 3 months–5 years 9.2 10.1 10.8 10.2 10.2
3 months–10 years 20.8 22.5 21.7 21.8
Female
0–39 3 months–5 years 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.7
3 months–10 years 1.9 1.5 2.3 1.9
40–49 3 months–5 years 1.5 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.7
3 months–10 years 3.3 3.5 4.6 3.7
50–59 3 months–5 years 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.7
3 months–10 years 6.0 6.1 5.5 5.8
60–69 3 months–5 years 4.0 3.9 4.3 3.9 4.1
3 months–10 years 8.7 8.6 8.4 8.6
70–79 3 months–5 years 4.9 4.7 5.6 5.5 5.2
3 months–10 years 11.7 11.0 10.1 11.0
All patients
0–39 3 months–5 years 0.6 0.7 1.0 0.8 0.8
3 months–10 years 1.7 1.5 2.1 1.8
40–49 3 months–5 years 1.7 1.9 2.0 1.8 1.9
3 months–10 years 3.9 4.0 4.7 4.2
50–59 3 months–5 years 3.9 3.5 3.7 3.5 3.7
3 months–10 years 8.8 8.1 7.5 8.1
60–69 3 months–5 years 5.8 6.0 6.6 6.1 6.2
3 months–10 years 12.8 13.3 12.9 13.0
70–79 3 months–5 years 7.3 7.7 8.6 8.4 8.1
3 months–10 years 16.4 17.2 16.8 17.0

Table 2 shows the SIR according to sex, age at diagnosis of the first cancer, and follow‐up interval. The SIR and 95% CI among those (of both sexes) who developed their first cancer at 0–39 and 40–49 years of age were 2.54 (1.43–3.66) and 1.75 (1.41–2.10), respectively, for the first year; 2.34 (1.86–2.82) and 1.61 (1.46–1.77), respectively, for the next 4 years; 1.90 (1.51–2.29) and 1.39 (1.25–1.53), respectively, for the next 5–10‐year period; and 2.13 (1.84–2.43) and 1.52 (1.42–1.62), respectively, for all 10 years after diagnosis of the first cancer. These ratios were higher than those in the total and other age groups. During the period 1–5 years after the diagnosis of the first cancer, 38% and 48% excess risk of metachronous second primary cancers was observed among men and women, respectively, who developed their first cancer at 50–59 years of age. Women aged 50–79 years had a tendency for a higher SIR of metachronous second primaries than men aged 50–79 years, whereas women aged 0–49 years had a tendency for a lower SIR than men aged 0–49 years.

Table 2.

Observed numbers and standardized incidence ratios of metachronous second primary cancer according to sex, age at diagnosis of the first cancer and years after diagnosis of the first cancer, 1985–2004

Age at diagnosis of the first cancer (years) Years after diagnosis of the first cancer
3 months–1 year 1–5 years 5–10 years* Total (3 months–10 years)
No. second primary cancers Person‐years SIR 95% CI No. second primary cancers Person‐years SIR 95% CI No. second primary cancers Person‐years SIR 95% CI No. second primary cancers  Person‐years SIR 95% CI
Male patients
0–39 9 5 739 4.59 1.59–7.59 34 20 737 3.88 2.58–5.19 27 16 937 2.34 1.46–3.23 70 43 414 3.15 2.41–3.88
40–49 37 10 557 1.81 1.23–2.39 170 35 274 1.89 1.61–2.18 164 27 466 1.50 1.27–1.73 371 73 298 1.69 1.52–1.86
50–59 282 31 382 1.53 1.35–1.70 927 93 355 1.38 1.29–1.47 731 59 066 1.22 1.13–1.30 1940 183 805 1.33 1.27–1.39
60–69 655 47 644 1.05 0.97–1.13 2279 130 211 1.19 1.14–1.23 1311 66 678 1.07 1.01–1.13 4245 244 535 1.13 1.09–1.16
70–79 638 32 168 0.93 0.86–1.01 1581 65 729 1.10 1.05–1.16 346 12 526 1.19 1.06–1.31 2565 110 423 1.07 1.03–1.11
Total (0–79) 1621 127 490 1.07 1.02–1.12 4991 345 305 1.21 1.18–1.24 2579 182 673 1.15 1.11–1.20 9191 655 475 1.17 1.14–1.19
Female patients
0–39 11 8 811 1.86 0.76–2.97 57 34 455 1.89 1.40–2.38 65 28 115 1.76 1.33–2.19 133 71 383 1.82 1.51–2.13
40–49 64 16 943 1.72 1.30–2.15 247 67 177 1.47 1.28–1.65 224 55 039 1.32 1.15–1.49 535 139 162 1.43 1.30–1.55
50–59 144 25 098 1.64 1.37–1.90 503 86 858 1.48 1.35–1.61 389 59 469 1.34 1.21–1.48 1036 171 427 1.45 1.36–1.53
60–69 211 27 930 1.24 1.07–1.41 799 88 050 1.35 1.25–1.44 524 54 128 1.17 1.07–1.27 1534 170 110 1.27 1.20–1.33
70–79 240 21 790 1.14 0.99–1.28 568 49 613 1.16 1.06–1.25 148 11 723 1.20 1.01–1.39 956 83 127 1.16 1.08–1.23
Total (0–79) 670 100 573 1.31 1.21–1.41 2174 326 153 1.34 1.28–1.4 1350 208 474 1.27 1.20–1.33 4194 635 209 1.31 1.27–1.35
All patients (both sexes)
0–39 20 14 550 2.54 1.43–3.66 91 55 192 2.34 1.86–2.82 92 45 052 1.90 1.51–2.29 203 114 796 2.13 1.84–2.43
40–49 101 27 500 1.75 1.41–2.10 417 102 451 1.61 1.46–1.77 388 82 505 1.39 1.25–1.53 906 212 460 1.52 1.42–1.62
50–59 426 56 480 1.56 1.41–1.71 1430 180 213 1.42 1.34–1.49 1120 118 535 1.26 1.18–1.33 2976 355 232 1.37 1.32–1.42
60–69 866 75 575 1.09 1.02–1.16 3078 218 260 1.22 1.18–1.27 1835 120 805 1.10 1.05–1.15 5779 414 645 1.16 1.13–1.19
70–79 878 53 958 0.98 0.92–1.05 2149 115 342 1.12 1.07–1.16 494 24 249 1.19 1.09–1.30 3521 193 550 1.09 1.05–1.13
Total (0–79) 2291 228 063 1.13 1.08–1.18 7165 671 459 1.25 1.22–1.28 3929 391 147 1.19 1.15–1.23 13385 1 290 684 1.21 1.19–1.23

CI, confidence interval. *Because of the high proportion of censored data, the low reliability of the standardized incidence ratios (SIR) among the population aged 70–79 years for the period 5–10 years after diagnosis of the first cancer should be kept in mind.

Table 3 lists the SIR according to selected sites of the first cancer and the follow‐up interval. There were no clear increasing or decreasing trends of SIR for any site of the first cancer for the duration of follow‐up. The highest SIR (~2.0–2.5) were observed for cancers of the mouth/pharynx, esophagus, and larynx, followed by cancers of the lung, breast, uterus, ovary, thyroid, and blood (~1.4–1.7). The ratios for the remaining cancer sites were approximately 1.1–1.3 and usually > 1.0 regardless of the significance.

Table 3.

Observed numbers and standardized incidence ratios of second primary cancer according to site of the first cancer and follow‐up interval after diagnosis of the first cancer, 1985–2004, for both sexes combined

Site of the first cancer ICD‐10 Follow‐up interval after diagnosis of the first cancer
3 months–1 year 1–5 years 5–10 years Total (3 months–10 years)
No. second primary cancers Person‐years SIR 95% CI No. second primary cancers Person‐years SIR 95% CI No. second primary cancers Person‐years SIR 95% CI No. second primary cancers Person‐years SIR 95% CI
Mouth/pharynx C00–14 107 5 578 2.27 1.84–2.70 368 16 439 2.66 2.39–2.93 187 9 621 2.26 1.93–2.58 662 31 638 2.47 2.28–2.65
Esophagus C15 109 5 460 1.96 1.59–2.32 205 9 576 2.04 1.76–2.32 86 3 570 2.10 1.66–2.55 400 18 606 2.03 1.83–2.23
Stomach C16 432 47 535 1.17 1.06–1.28 1522 145 980 1.33 1.26–1.39 1013 96 018 1.27 1.19–1.34 2967 289 536 1.28 1.24–1.33
Colorectum C18–20 376 36 192 1.29 1.16–1.42 1301 114 495 1.36 1.29–1.43 793 66 397 1.34 1.25–1.43 2470 217 085 1.34 1.29–1.39
Liver C22 239 22 872 1.14 1.00–1.29 619 53 731 1.19 1.10–1.29 138 13 654 1.00 0.84–1.17 996 90 258 1.15 1.08–1.22
Gallbladder C23, C24 34 3 613 0.98 0.65–1.31 81 6 205 1.40 1.10–1.71 34 2 703 1.35 0.90–1.81 149 12 522 1.27 1.06–1.47
Pancreas C25 36 3 824 1.02 0.68–1.35 45 3 730 1.37 0.97–1.77 13 1 339 1.14 0.52–1.76 94 8 893 1.18 0.94–1.42
Larynx C32 63 2 269 2.32 1.75–2.90 259 8 158 2.52 2.22–2.83 148 5 220 2.03 1.70–2.35 470 15 647 2.32 2.11–2.53
Lung C33, C34 284 22 705 1.32 1.16–1.47 533 39 087 1.47 1.34–1.59 162 13 571 1.24 1.05–1.43 979 75 364 1.38 1.29–1.47
Breast (females) C50 115 25 252 1.44 1.18–1.71 509 102 282 1.49 1.36–1.62 383 70 034 1.47 1.32–1.61 1007 197 571 1.48 1.38–1.57
Uterus C53–55 46 9 606 1.25 0.89–1.61 232 36 008 1.63 1.42–1.84 204 28 203 1.66 1.43–1.88 482 73 819 1.59 1.45–1.74
Ovary C56 24 3 592 1.78 1.07–2.50 67 10 212 1.81 1.38–2.24 33 5 840 1.54 1.01–2.07 124 19 644 1.72 1.42–2.03
Prostate C61 88 5 436 1.03 0.82–1.25 302 15 868 1.18 1.05–1.31 95 4 756 1.16 0.92–1.39 485 26 061 1.15 1.04–1.25
Kidney/urinary tract/bladder C64–68 128 9 816 1.26 1.04–1.48 493 33 330 1.42 1.30–1.55 272 20 392 1.24 1.09–1.39 893 63 539 1.34 1.25–1.43
Thyroid C73 30 3 432 1.81 1.16–2.46 97 14 893 1.36 1.09–1.63 83 11 953 1.43 1.12–1.74 210 30 278 1.44 1.25–1.64
Blood

C81–85,

 C88, C90,

 C91–96

93 10 121 1.45 1.15–1.74 258 28 528 1.56 1.37–1.75 126 15 685 1.54 1.27–1.80 477 54 334 1.53 1.39–1.67

CI, confidence interval; SIR, standardized incidence ratios.

Table 4 lists the SIR according to selected sites of the first and second primary cancers. Some specific associations were observed between the sites of the first and second primary cancers; specifically, the SIR for cancers of the mouth/pharynx, esophagus, and larynx were much higher. That is, the SIR between these three sites ranged between 4 and 22; however, the SIR for lung and the three sites was estimated to be approximately 2–3. The site relationships between breast, uterus, and ovary were relatively high, especially after first breast cancer (i.e. the SIR [95% CI] was 2.07 [1.71–2.43] for first breast to second uterus; 2.16 [1.62–2.70] for first breast to second ovary; 1.40 [1.10–1.71] for first uterus to second breast; and 1.43 [0.82–2.04] for first ovary to second breast). In addition, a high SIR for second thyroid cancer, but not first thyroid cancer, was observed.

Table 4.

Observed numbers and standardized incidence ratios of second primary cancer according to the site of first and second primary cancer, 1985–2004, in both sexes

First cancer site Second cancer site No. second primary cancers Person‐years SIR 95% CI
Mouth/pharynx Esophagus 137 32 483 13.62 11.34–15.90
Mouth/pharynx Stomach 81 32 571 1.38 1.08–1.68
Mouth/pharynx Colorectum 53 32 558 1.35 0.99–1.71
Mouth/pharynx Liver 66 32 599 1.49 1.13–1.85
Mouth/pharynx Gallbladder 11 32 684 1.52 0.62–2.41
Mouth/pharynx Pancreas 17 32 684 1.57 0.82–2.31
Mouth/pharynx Larynx 12 32 674 4.35 1.89–6.81
Mouth/pharynx Lung 113 32 562 2.45 2.00–2.90
Mouth/pharynx Prostate 18 32 657 1.73 0.93–2.53
Mouth/pharynx Kidney/urinary tract/bladder 16 32 656 1.30 0.66–1.94
Mouth/pharynx Blood 28 32 661 2.39 1.50–3.27
Esophagus Mouth/pharynx 94 19 043 21.63 17.26–26.00
Esophagus Stomach 58 19 128 1.32 0.98–1.66
Esophagus Colorectum 33 19 117 1.15 0.76–1.54
Esophagus Liver 40 19 154 1.21 0.83–1.58
Esophagus Pancreas 16 19 193 2.00 1.02–2.97
Esophagus Larynx 14 19 181 6.38 3.04–9.72
Esophagus Lung 62 19 129 1.71 1.29–2.14
Esophagus Prostate 14 19 181 1.51 0.72–2.30
Esophagus Kidney/urinary tract/bladder 19 19 173 2.00 1.10–2.90
Esophagus Blood 16 19 174 1.89 0.97–2.82
Stomach Mouth/pharynx 89 294 635 1.54 1.22–1.86
Stomach Esophagus 171 294 528 1.68 1.42–1.93
Stomach Colorectum 563 293 399 1.40 1.28–1.51
Stomach Liver 486 293 978 1.07 0.97–1.16
Stomach Gallbladder 91 294 693 1.17 0.93–1.41
Stomach Pancreas 134 294 709 1.18 0.98–1.38
Stomach Larynx 39 294 685 1.36 0.94–1.79
Stomach Lung 632 294 047 1.26 1.16–1.36
Stomach Breast (female) 126 294 397 1.63 1.34–1.91
Stomach Uterus 35 294 742 1.09 0.73–1.45
Stomach Ovary 15 294 779 1.04 0.51–1.56
Stomach Prostate 157 294 497 1.36 1.15–1.57
Stomach Kidney/urinary tract/bladder 163 294 433 1.26 1.07–1.45
Stomach Thyroid 31 294 695 1.86 1.20–2.51
Stomach Blood 137 294 653 1.14 0.95–1.33
Colorectum Mouth/pharynx 47 222 016 1.13 0.81–1.45
Colorectum Esophagus 95 221 949 1.31 1.05–1.57
Colorectum Stomach 558 220 824 1.28 1.17–1.39
Colorectum Liver 352 221 454 1.07 0.96–1.19
Colorectum Gallbladder 58 222 035 0.97 0.72–1.22
Colorectum Pancreas 109 222 020 1.28 1.04–1.52
Colorectum Larynx 29 222 010 1.50 0.96–2.05
Colorectum Lung 410 221 554 1.14 1.03–1.25
Colorectum Breast (female) 91 221 774 1.22 0.97–1.47
Colorectum Uterus 50 221 961 1.64 1.19–2.10
Colorectum Ovary 34 222 048 2.43 1.61–3.24
Colorectum Prostate 107 221 886 1.31 1.06–1.56
Colorectum Kidney/urinary tract/bladder 120 221 805 1.30 1.07–1.53
Colorectum Thyroid 42 221 956 3.00 2.09–3.91
Colorectum Blood 108 221 970 1.20 0.97–1.43
Liver Mouth/pharynx 31 91 628 1.51 0.98–2.04
Liver Esophagus 58 91 598 1.56 1.16–1.96
Liver Stomach 264 91 223 1.22 1.08–1.37
Liver Colorectum 170 91 367 1.19 1.01–1.37
Liver Gallbladder 22 91 655 0.82 0.48–1.17
Liver Pancreas 34 91 647 0.85 0.57–1.14
Liver Lung 146 91 519 0.82 0.69–0.95
Liver Breast (female) 24 91 633 1.26 0.75–1.76
Liver Ovary 12 91 658 3.23 1.40–5.06
Liver Prostate 47 91 597 1.09 0.78–1.41
Liver Kidney/urinary tract/bladder 52 91 585 1.13 0.82–1.44
Liver Thyroid 11 91 647 2.14 0.88–3.41
Liver Blood 67 91 605 1.60 1.21–1.98
Gallbladder Stomach 27 12 699 1.11 0.69–1.53
Gallbladder Colorectum 33 12 669 1.92 1.26–2.57
Gallbladder Liver 13 12 696 0.74 0.34–1.14
Gallbladder Lung 27 12 705 1.37 0.85–1.89
Pancreas Stomach 14 8 994 0.83 0.39–1.26
Pancreas Colorectum 18 8 991 1.55 0.83–2.26
Pancreas Lung 18 8 998 1.33 0.72–1.94
Larynx Mouth/pharynx 26 16 492 6.03 3.71–8.35
Larynx Esophagus 45 16 471 5.56 3.94–7.19
Larynx Stomach 84 16 291 1.81 1.43–2.20
Larynx Colorectum 41 16 431 1.44 1.00–1.88
Larynx Liver 47 16 472 1.32 0.94–1.70
Larynx Gallbladder 10 16 527 1.92 0.73–3.11
Larynx Pancreas 12 16 534 1.50 0.65–2.35
Larynx Lung 136 16 336 3.48 2.90–4.07
Larynx Prostate 11 16 517 1.10 0.45–1.75
Larynx Kidney/urinary tract/bladder 20 16 490 1.98 1.11–2.85
Larynx Blood 13 16 525 1.54 0.70–2.38
Lung Mouth/pharynx 35 76 773 2.14 1.43–2.84
Lung Esophagus 60 76 748 2.04 1.52–2.55
Lung Stomach 250 76 462 1.39 1.22–1.57
Lung Colorectum 146 76 533 1.24 1.04–1.44
Lung Liver 107 76 694 0.82 0.66–0.97
Lung Gallbladder 30 76 798 1.27 0.82–1.73
Lung Pancreas 46 76 789 1.36 0.96–1.75
Lung Larynx 21 76 778 2.51 1.44–3.58
Lung Breast (female) 34 76 724 1.66 1.10–2.21
Lung Uterus 11 76 806 1.30 0.53–2.07
Lung Prostate 62 76 713 1.67 1.26–2.09
Lung Kidney/urinary tract/bladder 64 76 730 1.65 1.25–2.06
Lung Thyroid 20 76 780 4.29 2.41–6.17
Lung Blood 43 76 777 1.22 0.86–1.59
Breast (female) Mouth/pharynx 16 200 696 1.40 0.71–2.08
Breast (female) Esophagus 20 200 702 1.92 1.08–2.76
Breast (female) Stomach 180 200 292 1.40 1.20–1.61
Breast (female) Colorectum 152 200 362 1.20 1.01–1.40
Breast (female) Liver 88 200 620 1.18 0.93–1.43
Breast (female) Gallbladder 36 200 686 1.28 0.86–1.69
Breast (female) Pancreas 42 200 705 1.27 0.88–1.65
Breast (female) Lung 103 200 563 1.24 1.00–1.48
Breast (female) Uterus 126 200 389 2.07 1.71–2.43
Breast (female) Ovary 61 200 574 2.16 1.62–2.70
Breast (female) Kidney/urinary tract/bladder 26 200 631 1.24 0.77–1.72
Breast (female) Thyroid 83 200 359 5.06 3.97–6.15
Breast (female) Blood 43 200 682 1.08 0.76–1.41
Uterus Stomach 54 74 675 1.06 0.78–1.35
Uterus Colorectum 75 74 568 1.56 1.21–1.92
Uterus Liver 29 74 741 0.98 0.62–1.33
Uterus Gallbladder 19 74 751 1.62 0.89–2.35
Uterus Pancreas 21 74 753 1.63 0.93–2.32
Uterus Lung 82 74 668 2.60 2.03–3.16
Uterus Breast (female) 82 74 497 1.40 1.10–1.71
Uterus Kidney/urinary tract/bladder 15 74 735 1.86 0.92–2.80
Uterus Thyroid 13 74 711 2.12 0.97–3.27
Uterus Blood 35 74 733 2.32 1.55–3.10
Ovary Stomach 11 19 858 0.99 0.40–1.57
Ovary Colorectum 33 19 802 3.04 2.00–4.07
Ovary Lung 12 19 876 1.73 0.75–2.71
Ovary Breast (female) 21 19 844 1.43 0.82–2.04
Ovary Blood 13 19 876 3.74 1.71–5.78
Prostate Mouth/pharynx 21 26 800 2.47 1.41–3.52
Prostate Esophagus 14 26 833 0.82 0.39–1.25
Prostate Stomach 119 26 628 1.23 1.01–1.46
Prostate Colorectum 80 26 698 1.35 1.05–1.65
Prostate Liver 59 26 741 0.87 0.65–1.09
Prostate Gallbladder 16 26 825 1.41 0.72–2.09
Prostate Pancreas 21 26 824 1.21 0.69–1.73
Prostate Lung 62 26 777 0.67 0.50–0.83
Prostate Kidney/urinary tract/bladder 50 26 763 2.21 1.60–2.83
Prostate Blood 22 26 822 1.24 0.72–1.75
Kidney/urinary tract/bladder Mouth/pharynx 17 65 125 1.21 0.64–1.79
Kidney/urinary tract/bladder Esophagus 36 65 118 1.41 0.95–1.88
Kidney/urinary tract/bladder Stomach 167 64 815 1.12 0.95–1.29
Kidney/urinary tract/bladder Colorectum 122 64 847 1.26 1.04–1.49
Kidney/urinary tract/bladder Liver 111 64 975 1.00 0.81–1.19
Kidney/urinary tract/bladder Gallbladder 25 65 137 1.35 0.82–1.88
Kidney/urinary tract/bladder Pancreas 33 65 147 1.21 0.80–1.62
Kidney/urinary tract/bladder Lung 177 64 960 1.41 1.20–1.61
Kidney/urinary tract/bladder Breast (female) 12 65 136 0.97 0.42–1.52
Kidney/urinary tract/bladder Uterus 12 65 116 2.32 1.01–3.64
Kidney/urinary tract/bladder Prostate 64 65 005 2.08 1.57–2.59
Kidney/urinary tract/bladder Blood 34 65 108 1.18 0.78–1.58
Thyroid Stomach 32 30 711 1.24 0.81–1.67
Thyroid Colorectum 27 30 689 1.25 0.78–1.72
Thyroid Liver 12 30 753 0.70 0.30–1.10
Thyroid Lung 26 30 716 1.43 0.88–1.98
Thyroid Breast (female) 37 30 666 1.97 1.34–2.61
Thyroid Blood 13 30 746 1.93 0.88–2.97
Blood Mouth/pharynx 14 55 012 2.18 1.04–3.32
Blood Esophagus 17 55 027 1.61 0.84–2.37
Blood Stomach 79 54 898 1.20 0.94–1.47
Blood Colorectum 55 54 931 1.20 0.88–1.51
Blood Liver 82 54 916 1.71 1.34–2.07
Blood Lung 71 54 957 1.38 1.06–1.70
Blood Breast (female) 10 55 005 0.65 0.25–1.04
Blood Prostate 19 55 015 1.77 0.98–2.57
Blood Kidney/urinary tract/bladder 24 54 990 1.77 1.06–2.47
Blood Thyroid 14 55 017 5.54 2.64–8.43

CI, confidence interval; SIR, standardized incidence ratios.

Discussion

The present study shows that in Osaka, Japan, 3.8% of study subjects (of both sexes) developed metachronous second primary cancers within 10 years of the first primary cancer between 1985 and 2005. Compared with our previous study, in which we reported that 2.0% of cancer patients developed metachronous second primary cancers between 1966 and 1986,4 the proportion of multiple primary cancers has approximately doubled in the past 20 years. Although constantly elevated SIR was not observed in the first decade in our previous study,4 elevated SIR for metachronous second primary cancers was observed among almost all sex and age groups over the study period in the present study. Almost all cancer patients were more likely to develop metachronous second primary cancers than the general population, as also found in another recent study in Australia.12 A possible explanation for this finding could be the accumulation or concentration of cancer risk factors, such as smoking, alcohol drinking, radiotherapy treatment, and other potential factors, including genetic factors, within an individual. It may be difficult to improve cancer patients' lifestyle. For example, smoking cessation is challenging even for patients recovering from lung cancer with curative treatment because a significant proportion of smokers with cancer do not receive formal assistance to quit.13 However, detection or surveillance bias may also play a part in the results, as evidenced in the elevated SIR of second thyroid cancer.14

We also found that the 10‐year cumulative risk for second primaries was 13.0% for those who developed their first cancer at 60–69 years of age. Although this finding was slightly higher than our previous results, with an approximate 10% 10‐year cumulative risk for second primaries for those who developed their first cancer at 60–69 years of age in 1978–1983,4 we added sex‐stratified information on cumulative risk for second primaries. Men with their first cancer diagnosed when they were at 60–69 years of age had a high cumulative risk of 16.2%, compared with an 8.6% risk in women. These figures clearly show that second primary cancer should be regarded as a problem commonly encountered in routine medical practice rather than a rare and unusual event to be described in case reports.

The SIR for metachronous second primary cancers from the first cancer of the mouth/pharynx, esophagus, and larynx, generally accepted as smoking and alcohol related, was higher than those from the other first cancers, including lung cancer. Robust site relationships of first and second primary cancers within these three cancer sites (mouth/pharynx to esophagus, mouth/pharynx to larynx, esophagus to larynx and each others) were found (see Table 4). Tobacco smoking is clearly one of the major causes of second primary cancers, as it is for first cancers.15 Generally, cigarette smokers had an approximate 15–30‐fold higher risk of lung cancer than non‐smokers, whereas an approximate 2–10‐fold higher risk of cancer of the mouth/pharynx, esophagus, or larynx has been reported for cigarette smokers.16 In the present study, a lower SIR between smoking‐related lung cancer and cancers of the mouth/pharynx, esophagus, or larynx was obtained than the SIR between these three sites. This may be due to combined effects of not only tobacco smoking, but also alcohol drinking, radiotherapy, or other potential factors,17 as well as to the relatively lower relative risk of cigarette smoking for lung cancer in Japan than in Western countries (i.e. 4.4 for men and 2.8 for women in Japan).18 The risk of developing a tobacco‐ or alcohol‐related second cancer has been linked mainly to patients' habits before the onset of the initial cancer, although continued smoking and drinking may enhance the risk.5, 19

Breast, uterine, and ovarian cancers had the next highest SIR for second primaries. Furthermore, we found that women aged 50–79 years had a higher SIR for second primaries than men aged 50–79 years. The site relationships between breast, uterus, and ovary were relatively high, especially after first breast cancer, whereas a robust site relationship between colorectal cancer and ovarian cancer was observed (see Table 4). These findings are consistent with previous evidence that women have slightly higher risk for second cancer compared with men because of the good survival rates for common female cancers.3 Female‐specific causes, such as hormonal environment due to menopause, may affect these relationships.17 Although the constellation of multiple cancers of the breast, uterine corpus, ovary, and colon has long intrigued investigators, nutritional and hormonal interactions, such as dietary habits (e.g. high fat intake) and reproductive factors (e.g. nulliparity), may contribute to the development of multiple primaries at these sites.5

The risk of second primary cancer can be modified ostensibly by improving medical scrutiny and notification of cancer patients.5 In our previous study, underestimation of the risk of second primary cancer may have been possible, with the incidence of second primaries differing substantially between 1966 and 1986. This may be due to the reliability of the registration indices because the number of cases registered by death certificate only and the number of cases verified histologically were not so favorable in Osaka during in the 1960s–1970s.4 The present study shows that the incidence rates per 100 000 person‐years for metachronous second primary cancers were approximately the same across all study periods (1985–2005) among both sexes in Osaka. This finding seems partly attributable to soundness of medical scrutiny and notification of cancer patients, as well as to stability in the registration indices.

One of the interesting relationships that emerged from the present analysis was that between hematological tumors and cancer of the mouth/pharynx, esophagus, uterus, ovary, and liver. Although there is evidence that hepatocellular carcinoma and lymphoma share a common risk factor, namely the hepatitis virus,20 the relationships between hematological tumors and cancer of the mouth/pharynx, esophagus, uterus, and ovary have been relatively unclear. Because of the age distribution or potential etiologies of hematological tumors, analyses using disease types (lymphoma, leukemia, and myeloma) and specific age categories, such as childhood, adolescence, and young adults, should be considered in future research.21 Although multiple primary cancers in some individuals provide a clue to understanding cancer etiology, including genetics,5, 22 a number of associations remain without apparent explanation.5 Because it is possible that other factors, such as socioeconomic status, genetics, lifestyle, or social network, may vary between people who have been diagnosed with cancer and those who have not,23 further investigations are required to identify the mechanisms underlying these relationships in the incidence of multiple primary cancers for specific interventions.

There are several limitations to the present study. First, we should keep in mind the changes in the completeness of cancer registration in Osaka when we evaluate incidence. The percentage of cases registered by death certificate only, which is often regarded as an index of completeness, was approximately 10–15% and registration has been stable in the Osaka Cancer Registry for the most recent two decades.24 Therefore, we considered that the effects of changes in completeness on incidence rates over the study periods are likely to be small. Second, some misclassifications for second primaries will be unavoidable in cancer registries, especially in cases registered by death certificate only. The IARC rules for second primaries are rather conservative compared with clinical practice; therefore, the risk for second primaries may be underestimated. Third, patients with second primary cancers may be followed‐up in hospitals where the completeness of registration of cancer cases is higher than average compared with other hospitals in Osaka. This could result in an overestimation for second primaries to some degree. Fourth, patients with cancer differ in many respects from the general population, and these characteristics may affect the risk of subsequent cancer. For example, women with cervical cancer tend to smoke more, bear children at an earlier age, and are of lower socioeconomic status than women in the general population.5 Because of the nature of cancer registries, these potential risk factors were not included in the data collection.

In conclusion, we have shown that cancer survivors in Osaka, Japan, are at higher risk of second primary cancer compared with the general population, in accordance with previous studies.11, 25, 26, 27 More than one‐tenth of cancer survivors aged over 60 years (specifically men over 50 years of age) will develop metachronous second primary cancer within 10 years of diagnosis of the first cancer. This clearly shows that second primary cancer should be considered as a commonly encountered major medical problem. The evaluation of second primary cancer identifies groups of cancer patients in need of increased surveillance for early cancer detection and management. Preventive measures are needed to reduce the occurrence of subsequent cancer and mortality.5 Because we obtained acceptably stable statistics for second primary cancer in Osaka, further studies are required to advance our understanding of effective measures against multiple primary cancers.

Disclosure Statement

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a Grant‐in‐Aid for Clinical Cancer Research from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (H22‐011). The authors are grateful to all the medical institutions in Osaka and the Osaka Medical Association that provided us with cancer incidence data.

References

  • 1. Kamo K, Katanoda K, Matsuda T, Marugame T, Ajiki W, Sobue T. Lifetime and age‐conditional probabilities of developing or dying of cancer in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2008; 38: 571–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Matsuda T, Ajiki W, Marugame T, Ioka A, Tsukuma H, Sobue T. Population‐based survival of cancer patients diagnosed between 1993 and 1999 in Japan: a chronological and international comparative study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2011; 41: 40–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Soerjomataram I, Coebergh JW. Epidemiology of multiple primary cancers. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 471: 85–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Tsukuma H, Fujimoto I, Hanai A, Hiyama T, Kitagawa T, Kinoshita N. Incidence of second primary cancers in Osaka residents, Japan, with special reference to cumulative and relative risks. Jpn J Cancer Res 1994; 85: 339–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Boice JD Jr, Storm HH, Curtis RE et al Introduction to the study of multiple primary cancers. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1985; 68: 3–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Fujimoto I, Hanai A, Hiyama T, Tsukuma H, Takasugi Y, Sugaya T. Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Osaka 1963–1989. Tokyo: Shinohara Publishers, 1993. (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
  • 7. World Health Organization . International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health Related Problems (The) ICD‐10 Second Edition. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ajiki W, Koyama Y, Kinoshita N, Tsukuma H, Oshima A. The comprehensive study for multiple primary cancers based on the hospital cancer registry data of the Osaka Medical Centre for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases In: Tsukuma H, ed. The Report for Grant‐in‐Aid for Cancer Research (12–4) from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Osaka: Suehiro Publishers, 2000; 111–26 (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Day NE. Cumurative rate and cumulative risk. In: Parkin DM, Muir CS, Whelan SL, Gao YT, Ferlay J, Powell J, eds. Cancer Incidence In Five Continents Volume VI. Lyon: IARC, 1992; 862–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) . International Rules for Multiple Primary Cancers (ICD‐O 3rd edn). Lyon: IARC, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. World Health Organization (WHO) . International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD‐O), 3rd edn Geneva: WHO, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Youlden DR, Baade PD. The relative risk of second primary cancers in Queensland, Australia: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer 2011; 11: 83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Cooley ME, Sarna L, Kotlerman J et al Smoking cessation is challenging even for patients recovering from lung cancer surgery with curative intent. Lung Cancer 2009; 66: 218–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sandeep TC, Strachan MW, Reynolds RM et al Second primary cancers in thyroid cancer patients: a multinational record linkage study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91: 1819–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Engeland A, Bjorge T, Haldorsen T, Tretli S. Use of multiple primary cancers to indicate associations between smoking and cancer incidence: an analysis of 500 000 cancer cases diagnosed in Norway during 1953–93. Int J Cancer 1997; 70: 401–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Nasca P, Pastides H. Fundamentals of Cancer Epidemiology, 2nd edn Ontario: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Adami HO, Hunter D, Trichopoulos D. Textbook of Cancer Epidemiology, 2nd edn New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Wakai K, Inoue M, Mizoue T et al Tobacco smoking and lung cancer risk: an evaluation based on a systematic review of epidemiological evidence among the Japanese population. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2006; 36: 309–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wynder EL, Mushinski MH, Spivak JC. Tobacco and alcohol consumption in relation to the development of multiple primary cancers. Cancer 1977; 40: 1872–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Matsuo K, Kusano A, Sugumar A, Nakamura S, Tajima K, Mueller NE. Effect of hepatitis C virus infection on the risk of non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma: a meta‐analysis of epidemiological studies. Cancer Sci 2004; 95: 745–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Reulen RC, Frobisher C, Winter DL et al Long‐term risks of subsequent primary neoplasms among survivors of childhood cancer. JAMA 2011; 305: 2311–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kuligina E, Reiner A, Imyanitov EN, Begg CB. Evaluating cancer epidemiologic risk factors using multiple primary malignancies. Epidemiology 2010; 21: 366–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Dong C, Hemminki K. Second primary neoplasms in 633 964 cancer patients in Sweden, 1958–1996. Int J Cancer 2001; 93: 155–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Curado M, Edwards B, Shin H et al Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Vol. IX. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Curtis RE, Boice JD Jr, Kleinerman RA, Flannery JT, Fraumeni JF Jr. Summary: multiple primary cancers in Connecticut, 1935–82. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1985; 68: 219–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Meadows AT, Friedman DL, Neglia JP et al Second neoplasms in survivors of childhood cancer: findings from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 2356–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Curtis RE, Freedman D, Ron E et al New Malignancies Among Cancer Survivors: SEER Cancer Registries, 1973–2000. NIH Publication no. 05–5302. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute, 2006. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cancer Science are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES