Abstract
The densely populated North Sea region encompasses catchments of rivers such as Scheldt and Meuse. Herein, agricultural, industrial, and household chemicals are emitted, transported by water, and deposited in sediments, posing ecological risks. Though sediment monitoring is often costly and time-intensive, modeling its toxicity to biota has received little attention. Due to high complexity of interacting variables that induce overall toxicity, monitoring data only sporadically validates current models. Via a range of concepts, we related bio-physicochemical constituents of sediment in Flanders to results from toxicity bioassays performed on the ostracod Heterocypris incongruens. Depending on the water body, we explain up to 90% of the variance in H. incongruens growth. Though variable across Flanders’ main water bodies, organotin cations and ammonia dominate the observed toxicity according to toxic unit (TU) assessments. Approximately 10% relates to testing conditions/setups, species variabilities, incoherently documented pollutant concentrations, and/or bio-physicochemical sediment properties. We elucidated the influence of organotin cations and ammonia relative to other metal(oxides) and biocides. Surprisingly, the tributylin cation appeared ∼1000 times more toxic to H. incongruens as compared to “single-substance” bioassays for similar species. We inferred indirect mixture effects between organotin, ammonia, and phosphate. Via chemical speciation calculations, we observed strong physicochemical and biological interactions between phosphate and organotin cations. These interactions enhance bioconcentration and explain the elevated toxicity of organotin cations. Our study aids water managers and policy makers to interpret monitoring data on a mechanistic basis. As sampled sediments differ, future modeling requires more emphasis on characterizing and parametrizing the interactions between bioassay constituents. We envision that this will aid in bridging the gap between testing in the laboratory and field observations.
1. Introduction
Despite decreasing emissions,1,2 persistent chemicals can remain in the aquatic ecosystem for decades (legacy pollutants)3 because they bind physicochemically to sediment.4 Changing bio-physicochemical conditions can render pollutants bioavailable again to let them re-initiate adverse effects on aquatic organisms.5,6 Thus, sediment “quality” is crucial to the health of an aquatic ecosystem.7,8
As a combination of species from different trophic levels and effect endpoints characterizes an ecosystem’s resilience,9−11 bioassays/test batteries for daphnia, algae, midge larvae, or bacteria12,13 are common to establish a weight of evidence approaches for sediment quality. Toxic effects vary not only between organisms and life stages14,15 but also due to differences in exposure regimes and sediment properties: one can use the solution as extracted from sediment16 to evaluate “dissolved” contaminants or exposure to whole sediment to elucidate more integrated effects.
A variety of chemometric methods attempt to explain the observed effects17−19 and have shown that toxicity often does not relate to dry weight pollutant concentration.20 Establishing dose–effect relationships with data from field studies is more difficult than that from spiking with single chemicals. Testing may not agree with field observations at all.21,22 Many interactions between sediment constituents can attenuate or amplify toxic effects, more so than for surface water, which hampers selection of a proper dose metric.23 Relations between bioassays and physicochemical constituents of sediment in the field are scarce, and quantitative predictions based thereon are elusive.
Among recent progress,24−27 insight into the extent of additional available binding capacity via sediment properties allowed correct identification of toxicity.28 Both the apparent bioavailability and toxicity relate to chemical speciation. Speciation is the quantitative distribution of all chemical forms of a compound over all possible phases, as a function of bio-physicochemical properties of the endemic solution: pH, hardness, redox conditions, and natural catalysts (clays, microorganisms). These factors vary geographically.29,30
The North Sea region has a documented history in pollution linked to industrial (heavy metals, acidification31) and agricultural (e.g., eutrophication) activities.32−34 An extensive measurement campaign by the Flemish Environmental Agency (VMM)32 has existed in Flanders for approximately 20 years, gathering information on pollutants in 1000+ sampling locations (e.g., metals, polycyclic hydrocarbons), in conjunction with characteristics known to affect speciation/bioavailability. Built hereon, models linked >60% of the observed variance in Hyalella azteca mortality bioassays to heavy metals and NH3/NH4+.35
Given the amount of pollutants and sediments to be evaluated and monitored, bioassay(s) should entail limited redundancy so as to capture the bulk of the potential effects with minimum effort and cost.36 Given their sensitivities, Chlorella vulgaris and Ceriodaphnia dubia may be suitable to evaluate metals,37 whereas Daphnia magna and Raphidocelis subcapitata may be more applicable to metallic/metal oxide nanomaterials.38 For Flanders, the question would be: which causal relationships between constituents of polluted sediment and ecotoxicological effects allow us to prioritize or complement bioassays?
Ostracod microcrustaceans are keystone meiofauna species in production and community metabolism of micro- or mesocosm freshwater beds.39 Present in diverse freshwater benthic habitats (ponds, lakes) in all continents, ostracods prove to be bioindicators when other species fall short.40 Many campaigns entail tests with Heterocypris incongruens (seed shrimp).41−44H. incongruens is substantially more sensitive than midge larvae45 and comparably sensitive (to heavy metals, NH4+) with H. azteca,41 but H. incongruens growth is particularly sensitive.39 As Flanders is an urbanized coastal (maritime) and agricultural region, concentrations of organotins (antifouling endocrine disruptors)46−48 and phosphate49,50 could be elevated and particularly relevant for growth.
Given the potentially higher sensitivity of H. incongruens growth to sediments in Flanders and its dissimilarity with other bioassays, we set out to build a quantitative model for predicting ostracod growth inhibition. Using extensive monitoring data in Flanders, we accounted for bioavailability and chemical speciation to develop a predictive model based on toxic unit (TU)51 calculations linking concentration to effect. We predict ostracod growth inhibition with appreciable certainty, ∼90%. Our method underpins that ostracods complement other bioindicators and supplements the existing suite of models.
2. Materials and Methods
In the current study, we quantitatively predict the growth inhibition of H. incongruens as would be observed when exposed to sediment. As an empirical exercise, we utilized the results from bioassays as obtained from our Flemish VMM monitoring campaign. Bioassays are detailed in Section 2.6 and elsewhere.45
Input variables for our predictions were dry weight concentrations of various chemicals. Following a recent study,35 we considered heavy metals, nitrogen, and phosphorus. Given exposure history, we also hypothesized local toxic effects by organotins. As variables, we also used common sediment characteristics: pH, organic carbon, clay, and the nitrogen status. Physicochemical sampling of sediments and analytical methods are detailed in the Supporting Information (Section S0) and elsewhere.13,32 We describe the parametrization below (Sections 2.1–2.5).
2.1. Estimation of Ammonia and Phosphate in Sediment
Data
on aqueous concentrations of NH4+ and
are either scattered,
unrepresentative, or their uncertainties are fairly high.13,32,35 This is partially due to their
high mobilities. Therefore, we estimate
and
from the total phosphorus, PT
| 1 |
with f being a ratio applied to total
P to distinguish for available fractions: a typical natural water
body (PT ∼23 or ∼30 mg/m3) constitutes 3 mg/m3 soluble
+
and usual (
+
)/PT ratios of 1:10. Hence, fP=0.1.52
In turn, we estimate NH4+ and NH3 concentrations from the Kjeldahl nitrogen (KjN) and eq 2
| 2 |
wherein fN is taken as the fraction of the KjN that is [NH4+] + [NH3], taken to be 0.5(±0.1).53,54 Exclusive for the data in West Flanders (s = 1, else s = 0), we applied a sinoid term with maximal amplitude (peak) in mid-march (d = 65)55,56 to account for local seasonal (agricultural) fluctuations57,58 (S1). If the data adhering to negative growth inhibition (Section 2.6) did not entail KjN determination, we applied the log-average of samples analyzed throughout Flanders. To prevent bias, we excluded those sediments that we already selected from curation (Section 2.6).
2.2. Bioavailability
Toxicity is most often associated with the fraction of the chemical that is freely bioavailable. Though test vessels contained sediment,13,59 we had no information on burrowing behavior. We assumed that all ostracods are exposed to chemicals in the water phase. From our campaign, we obtained only the total sediment concentrations. Since those sediments are applied to the (aqueous) bioassay, we estimate in situ water concentrations from the total in sediment.
We converted sediment (sed) concentrations to water (aq) concentrations via phase partitioning60,61
| 3 |
wherein 0.2 represents the sediment to test volume ratio (1:545). Considering that the test medium is prescribed as moderately hard,13 we took the value for the solids-to-water partitioning coefficient KSW, local for NH4+/NH3 and H2PO4–/HPO42– to be 6.0(±3.0)62−65 and 100 L/kg,66,67 respectively, for field concentrations64−66 representable for Flanders13,32,35 and pH = 7.4.
The binding of metals is stronger in sediments with increasing clay and organic carbon (OC),68,69 creating a natural “bias”. Thus, we calculated KSW,local based on %clay and %OC content, analogous to Bruijn and Denneman70
| 4 |
wherein we obtained the solid-water partition coefficient (KSW) from the literature,60,71,72 representing a mix of speciation states. KSW values were assumed to represent 11% clay and 5% OS.13,68a and b are the concentrations (mg/kg dissolved substances) of metals per %clay and %OS, respectively, based on (log–log) multiple linear regression (MLR) for the entire VMM (Flanders) data set (N = 1762):
| 5 |
Considering their hydrophobicity, we estimated KSW,local for organotins from their organic carbon partition coefficients (KOC) and the %OC content (varying 10 ≳ %OC ≳ 0.113,32):
| 6 |
Sediment and biota affect the in situ ionic composition of the medium,73,74 though the influence of salinity75,76 on organotin sorption is conflicting (salting out vs. cation exchange). We also lacked information on the relevant OC type.75 Hence, we did not consider influences of salinity and pH on KOC. Instead, we applied log-normal averages for KOC values reported for fresh and marine sediments (Table 1).
Table 1. Sorption Equilibrium Partitioning Coefficients.
| chemical | log KOC75 | log KSW | ref |
|---|---|---|---|
| tetrabutyltin | 5.5(±0.1) | 4.2(±0.1)a | (75) |
| tributyltin | 5.3(±0.1) | 4.0(±0.1)a | (75) |
| dibutyltin | 5.2(±0.2) | 3.9(±0.2)a | (75) |
| monobutyltin | 5.0(±0.2) | 3.7(±0.2)a | (75) |
| triphenyltin | 4.9(±0.1) | 3.6(±0.2)a | (75) |
| diphenyltin | 4.7(±0.2) | 3.4(±0.2)a | (75) |
| monophenyltin | 4.4(±0.3) | 3.1(±0.2)a | (75) |
| NH4+/NH3 | n/a | 0.8b | (62, 65) |
| H2PO4–/HPO42– | n/a | 2.0(±0.5)b | (66) |
| Cd | n/a | 2.1a | (60) |
| Cr | n/a | 2.5a | (60) |
| Cu | n/a | 1.7a | (60) |
| Hg | n/a | 2.2a | (60) |
| Ni | n/a | 0.9a | (60) |
| Pb | n/a | 2.8a | (60) |
| Zn | n/a | 2.0a | (60) |
Taken to represent sediments in Flanders with 5% OC and 11% and clay.
Taken for all sediments in Flanders.
2.3. Speciation
Toxicity is often the result of a specific speciation state of a chemical; heavy metals, organotins, phosphate, and ammonia are subject to adopt different speciation. Thus, we describe explicitly the influence of the (bio)chemical properties of the endemic solution.
Phosphate may act both as a toxicant49 and a nutrient,50 whereas organotins and ammonium are toxicants. Prominently, the fraction of nonionized ammonium often relates to observed toxicity.77 The species (de)protonate according to
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
We thus determine their speciation via Henderson–Hasselbalch78
| 10 |
| 11 |
wherein pKa(XHn + 1 = NH4+) = 9.25 and pKa(XHn + 1 =
) = 7.2. We took the pKa values for organotins from the literature
(Table 2).
Table 2. Proton Dissociation Constant (pKa) Valuesa.
| name | formula | pKa | ref |
|---|---|---|---|
| tetrabutyltinhydroxide | Sn(By)4 | n/a | n/a |
| tributyltinhydroxide cation | (Sn(OH2))+(By)3 | 6.25 | (79−81) |
| dibutyltinhydroxide cation | (Sn(OH2)1)+(OH)1(By)2 | 5.1(±0.2) | (82) |
| monobutyltinhydroxide cation | (Sn(OH2)1)+(OH)2(By)1 | 5.9(±0.1) | (82) |
| triphenyltinhydroxide cation | Sn(OH2)+(Ph)3 | 5.2 | (79, 81, 83) |
| diphenyltinhydroxide cation | (Sn(OH2)1)+(OH)1(Ph)2 | 4.0 | (84)b |
| monophenyltinhydroxide cation | (Sn(OH2)1)+(OH)2(Ph)1 | 4.8 | **c |
| dihydrogenphosphate | H2PO4– | 7.2 | n/a |
| ammonia | NH4+ | 9.25 | n/a |
See Table S2 for full details. By = butyl; Ph = phenyl.
In 75% dioxane–water solution. pKa values of ligands in 75% dioxane–water solutions are higher than those reported in water.84
Double asterisks mean an estimation assuming the substitution of butyl by phenyl has a constant effect on pKa: pKa MPT = pKa MBT – ((pKa TBT – pKa TPT) + ( pKa DBT – pKa DPT)/2).
Cr toxicity relates to the presence of CrO42–85,86 via microbial (nitrification,87−89 eutrophication33) and redox processes:90 [CrO42–] correlates with [NO3–] and pH91 due to (bio)chemical reactions
| 12 |
| 13 |
Because KSW(Cr3+) ≫ KSW(
), the total sediment Cr concentration
is dominated by [Cr3+], i.e.,
Thus, based on eqs 12 and 13, we characterized
the ratio between
and Cr3+ empirically via35
| 14 |
wherein we take
on average
to be 4.13% of total Cr91 and c, d, e, and f are
regression coefficients35 (Figure S4). Since KSW of CrVI (<1–50 L/kg) ≫ Crlll (850–5600 L/kg),92 ∼90%
of aqueous Cr is
.
2.4. Median Effect Concentrations (EC50)
With the exception of Cr and Sn, we assumed that the total concentration of metals is equal to a single free valent (uncomplexed) M2+ oxidation state, as the sole contributor to the observed toxicity. We assume that Cr expresses toxicity only via the CrO42– form (Table 3).
Table 3. H. incongruens Effect Level Concentrations of Chemicals from the Open Literaturea.
| chemical | effect (EC50) concentration (ng/L) | effect (EC50) concentration (ng/L cation)b | ref |
|---|---|---|---|
| tetrabutyltin | 50 | n/a | Table S3 |
| tributyltinhydroxide | 50 | 3.5 | Table S3 |
| dibutyltinhydroxide | 50 | 0.3 | Table S3 |
| monobutyltinhydroxide | 50 | 1.6 | Table S3 |
| triphenyltinhydroxide | 50 | 0.3 | Table S3 |
| diphenyltinhydroxide | 50 | 0.02 | Table S3 |
| monophenyltinhydroxide | 50 | 0.1 | Table S3 |
| Cu2+ | 950,000 | n/a | (95) |
| Ni2+ | 2500,000 | n/a | (95) |
| Hg2+ | 400,000 | n/a | (95) |
| Zn2+ | 14,775,880 | n/a | (95) |
| Cd2+ | 70,000 | n/a | (95) |
| CrO42–c | 4,310,000 | n/a | (95) |
| Pb2+ | 39,200,000 | n/a | (95) |
| NH3 | 2000 | 140,000d | (96, 97) |
| HPO42–/H2PO4– | 3,905,460,000 | 2,000,000,000e | (49) |
The values for organotins are the means from hatching, developmental, growth, and mortality experiments with varying durations (4 to 28 days); details are shown in Table S3.
Assuming pH = 7.4.
Since dichromate hydrolyzes in water (Cr2O72– + H2O ⇌ 2 CrO42– + 2H+), we multiplied EC50 by 2.
Represents NH3.
Represents HPO42–.
In contrast to uncomplexed heavy metals (Table 3), to our knowledge, there are no 6 day EC50 values available for H. incongruens growth when exposed to organotins, NH3, or H2PO4–/HPO42–. Since we assumed all H. incongruens to reside in the water layer, we screened the literature for aqueous phase EC50 values for related species/studies. Though tributylated organotin is generally more toxic than other organotins,93,94 to our knowledge, there is no information on the (relative) H. incongruens toxicity due to substituents.
Based on Table S3, we initially estimated (based on log-averages) the EC50 of (neutral) organotins, NH3, and HPO42– for H. incongruens growth to be 50, 2000, and 2,000,000,000 ng/L (Table 3), respectively.
2.5. Toxic Unit (TU)
2.5.1. Initial Approximation
The TU estimates mixture-toxicity risks to both terrestrial and aquatic communities.8 We assessed the total exposure from the sediment by summing the exposures for all of the contaminants (eq 15)98
| 15 |
wherein n reflects the number of pollutants i, taken as heavy metals, organotins, NH3, and H2PO4–/HPO42–.
For the current purpose, it was not feasible to parametrize a priori the toxic interaction between chemicals based on their EC50 values only (i.e., without SSD shape parameters).51,99 Taking γi = 1 reflects all chemicals to have a similar mode of action (MoA) and negligible interaction between chemicals. As the simple response addition (RA) method does not necessarily produce better results than concentration addition (CA),35eq 15 produces an “educated guess” for the TU of H. incongruens.
2.5.2. Calibration
Assuming a logistic distribution of sensitivities toward the polluted sediment, we described the percentage of growth inhibited as a function of exposure via a cumulative logistic distribution function98
| 16 |
wherein β is a steepness function and TU is initially the ratio of the measured (bioavailable) chemical concentration [C]aq to its effect concentration [EC50]aq.100 Fitting mortalities with these TU values (Section 2.5.1) produced suboptimal results (Figure 3A; Figures S5, S7).
Figure 3.
H. incongruens growth inhibition (%) versus the toxic unit. GI = growth inhibition. (A) EC50 for organotins (cations) represented 3 ng/L; pH assumed to be 7.5. R2 = 0.26. (B) EC50 for organotins (cations) represented 0.003 ng/L (eq 17); pH assumed to be 7.5. R2 = 0.82. (C) EC50 for organotins (cations) represented 0.003 ng/L(eq 17); pH taken for the porewater. R2 = 0.90.
To acquire statistically better predictions based on the explained variance, we allowed variation in EC50 values to fit the growth inhibition data (Section 2.6) via eq 16. This was done via the factor γi in eq 15. The preselected range for γi was 1000. The fitting implies the average TU fixed at the exposure for which 50% of the growth is inhibited. We envisioned potential divergences between values for γiEC50 and EC50 to be the result of unknown testing procedures and conditions altering speciation, bioavailability (e.g., metals as oxides or organometals), or MoAs. Final γiEC50 values are given in Figure 2.
Figure 2.
H. incongruens growth inhibition (%) versus the toxic unit. EC50 for organotin cations was taken to be 0.003 ng/L, representing By3SnOH2+. Simulation was performed using β = 4.5 (unitless). The far-left triangle denotes the weighted average of values with log TU < −1. Squares denote data wherefore KjN was unknown and taken as a regional average (Section 2.1). The table provides corresponding uncertainties/ranges. For EC50 values, the errors are those carried over from errors in bioavailabilities.
2.6. Bioassay Description and Data Curation
We calibrate and test our methods (eqs 1–16) using data on whole-sediment toxicity assessed by VMM via laboratory bioassays performed on the ostracod H. incongruens, a small benthic freshwater crustacean. The data represents a 6 day growth inhibition test (ISO 14371101) with freshly (≤52 h old) hatched cysts (i.e., neonates, with lengths of 150–250 μm) incubated at 25(±1) °C, in darkness. Details are shown elsewhere.45,102 The percentage % of growth inhibition μ because of exposure to sediment is defined45 as
| 17 |
where the lengths are the averages of a total of 60 organisms distributed across six replicates. The reference refers to a standard sand. For the reference, lengthday6, reference ≥ 1.5·lengthday0 and mortality is ≤20%. To enlarge our modeling domain, we specifically included also bioassays reporting negative growth inhibition (i.e., growth stimulation).
Since the bioassay is aerobic, it should represent aerobic sediments in the field. This implies minimizing speciation-related changes due to in situ anaerobic–aerobic transformations. Also, previous O2 deprivation in the field may create bias for germination/growth (chemical cues) at the start of the bioassay: crustaceans are sensitive to O2 deprivation;103,104 low O2 induces dormancy (HOEC = 5.5 mg O2/L).104 Taking 44 ± 4 mg/L and 0.21 as solubility (T ≈ 20 °C) and partial pressure, respectively, this amounts to 60 ± 5% O2. H. incongruens does not tolerate acidic conditions.39
Therefore, we exclude all assays for which the field porewater O2 < 65%, O2 ≥ 100%, and pH ≤ 6.5, which we consider nonrepresentable sediments.
3. Results
We performed analyses to elucidate the toxicity of sediments in Flanders to H. incongruens. According to initial TU results (Figures S5, S7), NH3 (TU = 0.1) contributed most to H. incongruens growth inhibition. Other contributors were Ni and Cu (TUs ≤ 0.1), whereas the individual TUs of Zn, Cd, CrO4, Hg, and Pb were ≤0.01. Predicting the % growth inhibition via initial TU using initial (standard) EC50 values (Table 3, Section 2.5.1) yielded maximal explained variance lower than 30%. Initially, speciation calculations (eqs 11, 14) did not appear to improve these results. In contrast to Figure S7 (wherein there is a low contribution), organotins are among the species most highly correlating with H. incongruens % growth inhibition (Figure S9).
We then performed “semiempirical” analyses to further elucidate the toxicity of sediments by letting γiEC50 values fit the growth inhibition data (Section 2.5.2). This “calibrating” procedure allowed a robust TU analysis for H. incongruens. According to the semiempirical analysis, too, NH3 dominates the TU (TU = 0.3). Additional toxic pressure arises from organotins (as represented by tributyltin, TU = 0.3). Then, the contributions from Ni and Cu appear minor (≤0.1) (Figure 1). Inclusion of chemicals other than NH3, HPO42–, and By3SnOH2 only marginally improved the fit. Instead, we found a positive influence by HPO42–, i.e., growth-promoting (TU = −0.3).
Figure 1.
Toxic units for H. incongruens ([C]aq/EC50aq) for individual pollutants in sediments from water bodies in Flanders. Table 3 denotes EC50aq values for free metals; Figure 2 denotes EC50 values for NH3, By3SnOH2+, and H2PO4/HPO4, contrasting ranges in Table 3. Hence, the TUs may be both underestimations/overestimations. Error bars denote variability throughout Flanders. For MFT (PhSn(OH)2OH2+), assuming porewater (pH = 7.5), 99% of samples were below the detection limit (DL); negative errors are 10-fold the SD including the values set at the DL.
After calibration, we found that speciation calculations (eq 11) significantly improved the results (Figure 3B,C). Then, NH3, organotins, and HPO42– explain up to 90% of the observed variance in the % growth inhibition for water bodies throughout Flanders. We established γiEC50 values for NH3, HPO42–, and TBT cation (By3SnOH2+) at 150,000–39,000 and 0.003 ng/L. The relative importance of the toxicants differs between water bodies. In general, there is a higher toxic pressure in West Flanders than in inland regions (Table S4). In general, predictions for H. incongruens growth inhibition are more precise for “uniform” (e.g., large rivers and canals) water bodies than for small “nonuniform” water bodies.
4. Discussion
For sediments in Flanders, we report a maximum growth of H. incongruens of 56% (Supporting Information). The curated data depict a leveling (for low toxicant concentrations) between 0 and −40% (Figure 2). In comparison, H. incongruens grows in unpolluted soft and hard water (pH = 7) with 0.063(±0.003) and 0.072(±0.003) mm/day, respectively.105 Assuming linear growth, this amounts to 84(±42)% in 6 days, similar to sediments in Flanders with “low” toxicant concentrations. This indicates toxic pressure to H. incongruens in the majority of bioassays on sediments from Flanders.
We explain up to 90% of the variance in H. incongruens growth. The standard error of model prediction (Figure 2) is lower than that of a similar model for H. azteca.35 This is likely related to a better defined testing system and lower physical or metabolic complexity of the organism.13,45 Predictions appear more precise for neonate growth than for survival (Figures S9, S13), similar to earlier observations.96 A coefficient of variation of 6–20% was reported using parallel mortality assays.106 Thus, the contribution of other toxicants, erroneous speciation/bioavailability, or mixture effects to the residual variance (∼10%, Figure 2) is limited. 10-fold intraspecies uncertainty factors are widely used;107 our prediction errors are well within this margin.
The average toxic pressure for H. incongruens is comparable to that for H. azteca.35 Both initial and calibrated TU analyses support our hypotheses that NH3, along with heavy metals, dominates the effects on H. incongruens. Meanwhile, in contrast to H. azteca,35 CrO42– did not appear to contribute to the apparent toxicity. The analysis also shows that the mixture of organotins, NH3, and HPO42– acts distinctly toward H. incongruens. We interpreted this partially as a bioconcentration effect, which we will explain stepwise below. From its distinct sensitivity and the 90% explained variance, we deem the H. incongruens sediment contact test to be a complementary bioassay to evaluate sediment and water quality.
4.1. Organotins
Ni and Cu seemed to only marginally inhibit growth (TUs ≤ 0.1), though heavy metal loading as low as 100 μg/kg affecting aquatic species is generally accepted.108 Organotins, as characterized by TBT, appear significantly more toxic to H. incongruens than to similar aquatic species in single-substance tests (Figure 2, Table S3). This is on average a factor of 1000, irrespective of speciation. In other words, the term γTBT in eq 15 is ∼1 × 10–3. Metals react with receptors, enzymes, DNA, protein and lipids or produce structural and functional changes resulting in toxic damage. The toxicant can be a derivative of the parent metal or reactive species (ROS or RNS) from (bio)transformations.
The correlation between TBT cation concentrations and growth inhibition is stronger than for the neutral TBT (Figure 3B,C; Figure S10). Since H. incongruens is small, the internal (e.g., cytoplasmic) pH may be correlated to medium/porewater pH.109,110 This indicates that growth inhibition is associated with the cation. In contrast, organotin toxicity toward yeast increases with cations < hydroxides < chlorides.111 From pH 5.8 to 8.0, the KOW of TBT and TPT increased.112,113 As it partitions into the lipid fraction of the biomembrane, the neutral (hydrophobic) form is more bioavailable:114 uptake and bioconcentration of TBT are higher at pH 8.0 (where neutral TBTOH predominates) than at pH 5.0–6.0.115
However, biomembrane–water distribution of the TBT cation exceeds liposome–water distribution, and distribution of the TBT cation exceeds that of the neutral hydroxo-complex. This relates to the cation complexing with ligands and proteins.114 This indicates that the high sensitivity of H. incongruens growth on organotin as compared to other aquatic species (Figure 2; Table S2) does not arise from nonpolar (baseline) narcosis.116 In turn, this implies interactions between the TBT cation and proteins with growth regulation activity.117
Endocrine activity of TBT in crustaceans refers to the interactions with the ecdysteroid receptor–retinoid-X receptor dimer (CrcEcR-CrcRXR) complex:48,117,118 TBT binds in the electrostatic and neutral areas of CrcRXR.117 The ecdysone (nuclear) receptor is responsible for transcriptional regulation of molting,119 which is critical for growth of crustaceans accumulating (i.e., “feeding on”) phosphate and carbonate. Interaction with vitellogenin and cuticular proteins may cause a second endocrine disruption on the Y-organ–ecdysteroidal endocrine axis and impair growth.117
4.2. Phosphate
In contrast to toxicity (γPO4 > 0), phosphate appears to promote H. incongruens growth (γPO4 < 0) (eq 15). The apparent effect level is ∼0.04 mg/L, far lower than levels causing toxicity (∼2000 mg/L49). Given the aqueous concentration of phosphate in the bioassays, 0.02–2 mg/L, and an LC50 value of approximately 3900 mg/L,49 toxicity of HPO42– to H. incongruens is negligible. H. incongruens is one of the only two ostracods wherefore Ca2+ positively correlates with its natural abundance; Ca2+ associates with phosphate.120 P content of the carapace differs geographically.39
Prior to molting, ostracods store CaHPO4 (apatite) granules and chitin precursors in epidermal cells. The granules expulse their content, which is transformed into platelets of CaCO3, disintegrated to amorphous calcite and, ultimately, crystals to build the carapace.121 Note that HCO3– is not a limiting factor (relatively constant) since it is added via the synthetic medium.45 The carapace may need ∼7 days to complete its calcification, via up to nine growth stages (instars).50
We find a higher correlation for HPO42– than for H2PO4– (Figure 3B,C; Figure S11). Indeed, an alkaline environment (high pH) accelerates tissue calcification.122,123 Moreover, calcium phosphate crystallinity decreases with an increase in reaction pH,123,124 and solubilities decrease with increasing pH.125 The combined results indicate that phosphate in bioassays performed with sediments from Flanders, in the HPO42– form, promotes H. incongruens growth.
4.3. Ammonia
Whereas we initially assigned an EC50 value for NH3 of 0.002 mg/L, we found an empirical value for γNH3EC50 of 0.15 mg/L (implying γNH3 > 1) (eq 15). In analogy, the LC50 value for H. azteca exposed to NH3 is 2–5 mg/L,78,126 whereas in bioassays, it appears empirically to be 5000 mg/L.35 The average TU of NH4+/NH3 is 0.3 across Flanders, and NH3 explains 30% of the variance in growth inhibition. We noted a relatively high toxicity of sediments from West Flanders (e.g., Yser river) collected during (fertilization56 in) spring; levels of NH4+/KjN in the Yser are structurally high (Table S4); anaerobic conditions are more likely for those sediments.
We found a slightly higher correlation for NH3 than for NH4+ (Figure 3B,C; Figure S12). Aquatic ecotoxicity studies in the 1990s identified NH4+/NH3 (esp. NH3) as a contributing cause.127 More so than NH4+, NH3 can pass through biological surfaces into tissue fluid. When pH of the tissue fluid is lower than that of the surrounding water, NH3 can disrupt ionoregulatory functions.49,128 In addition, NH3 may activate N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors in the brain,129 leading to intoxication.
4.4. Mixture Effects
The γiEC50i values for HPO42–, NH3, and organotin used for the analysis differed from the initial estimation (Table 3; Figure 2). With respect to literature EC50 values, much variation exists (Table S3); the values obtained represent extreme values. Thus, the extreme γiEC50i values may not only represent a direct mode of toxic action from HPO42–, NH3, and organotin individually but also suggest toxicity as the result of interaction(s) between them, i.e., γi ≠ 1 (see eq 15).
There are many documented interactions between P, N, and metals.130 However, models (e.g., the TU, eq 15) often describe toxicity additively or independently,98 i.e., not including synergistic/antagonistic mixture effects.131 Mixture toxicity entails detailed description of the interactions between sediment fractions and chemicals: depending on numerous conditions, metals form organic complexes or oxides, each with its own characteristic influence on the intoxication pathway.
4.4.1. Phosphorus–Tin Interaction
Though phosphorus can be toxic,132 it can diminish metal toxicity via precipitation.133 Phosphate is a polydentate ligand forming negatively charged complexes with triorganotins mono- and dimers;73,134 organotin is 102–105 times more selective toward phosphate than toward other oxoanions135 and aids in its extraction.136 In fact, extraction of organotins from sediment co-extracts phosphorus compounds.137 Plants absorb phosphate; ostracods feed on dead/living plants. Thus, the influence of sediment’s organic phosphate on the distribution of TBT in ostracods may relate to dietary assimilation via periphyton.120,130 Acute toxicity of TPT on ostracods may be supplemented by elimination of food.138
Prominently, H. incongruens accumulates HPO42–, hence TBT, via molting (Section 4.2). Additionally, the TPT+ cation sorbs onto liposomes via complex formation with phospholipids.114 Guanosine-5-monophosphate (G-5-MP) most efficiently forms a competitive organotin complex;139 as an essential enzyme for cell growth, G-5-MP kinase converts GMP to GDP. Combined, the interactions with phosphate compounds indicate an effective bioconcentration larger than based on the thermodynamic (hydrophobic) maximum ((1) in Figure 4). Reported BCFs for species (e.g., bivalves) capable of accumulating phosphate are ∼1000 times larger than those without the capability.81,140 This value matches with 1/γTBT, insinuating a similar TMoA:
| 18 |
Figure 4.

Simplified schematic of interactions between sediment constituents affecting bioassay toxicity. Green and red arrows denote positive and negative effects on H. incongruens growth, respectively. According to de Deckere et al.,13 O2 ought to remain ≥60% during bioassays.
4.4.2. Nitrogen–Tin Interaction
Since the bioassays are aerobic,45,102 NH3/NH4 may be converted to NO2–/NO3– (Figure 4), which would be enhanced by bioturbation.74 Conversion to NO3–35 could contribute to the high apparent γEC50 value of NH3 (Figure 2). Though affecting ostracods,141−143 NO3– is likely not directly toxic.35,144 Instead, metal-nitrates are well-soluble, hence bioavailable.145 Heavy metals may influence nitrification.88,146 In turn, nitrification and volatilization (NH4+ → NH3(↑) + H+) affect pH. Changes in pH in sediment/ecotoxicity tests are reported;35,147 we cannot assume that buffering was consistent.
Surplus H+ increases the cation concentration and interactions of the TBT metal-type behavior by complex formation with ligands in phospholipids and proteins,48,148 illustrated by (2) in Figure 4. NO3– and SO42– (also in the EPA medium) may solubilize organotins. In addition, the relative concentrations of NH4 and metals may influence uncoupling of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation.149
4.5. Limitations, Recommendations, and Outlook
Sorption to varying organic carbon did not appear to strengthen correlations (eq 6). Apart from those considered here, other sediment constituents (e.g., Al, Mg, Ca, S) affect speciation and bioavailability.30,150 Prominently, acid-volatile sulfide (AVS)20,69 relates to invertebrate toxicity.85,86,151 We can determine bioavailability more comprehensively by distinguishing sediment fractions (e.g., humic acid75) and binding mechanisms,152 pending available data.75,153Section S3 contains a more complete discussion of limitations. Despite increased monitoring,13 it is laborious to measure all such relevant parameters, which depend on the sediment/organism. Even if we have such direct detailed information, it is difficult to describe all interactions explicitly.154−156 We therefore ought to consider also (semi)empirical- and evidence-based approaches.
Based on the current study, we argue for an approach based on (bio)chemical interactions between NH4+, organotins, and HPO42–. Incomplete monitoring data for N or P might obscure or underestimate ostracod toxicities.35 Since phosphate was not present in reference sediments, this may obscure the toxic effect on the ostracods. Thus, we propose to standardize total phosphorus (i.e., phosphate) in the sediment bioassays. Prediction of ostracod growth is probably more straightforward than that of mortality, which relates to, e.g., complexity of the toxic mode of action. Due to the higher sensitivity of juveniles, we recommend using the neonate test or making age-based extrapolations. BCF tests should elucidate the validity of eq 18.
Pollutants are not always (directly) measured, which would be important for remote (small) water bodies where an “exotic” chemical may skew local toxicity. More direct data for NH4/PO4 may help to solidify the relationships.35,157,158 Large, uniform water bodies are less susceptible to pressures from point releases of chemicals (dilution). Higher temperature and drought (concentrating pollutants) may influence (bio)transformation, O2 uptake, and elevate toxicity.159 This determines parametrization, representability, and implementability of models. We may optimize via identifying “hotspot” locations, e.g., bridges/harbors.160 Concentrations of organotins appear to decrease over time in sediment in Flanders. Removal mechanisms include leaching into sea or biodegradation (Figure S3; Figure 5), which need to be elucidated.
Figure 5.
First-order disappearance rate constant for TBT in Flemish sediment (x, in year–1) versus salinity and concentration (y1 and y2). Symbols denote distinct sampling locations, having a uniform temporal trend in concentration (continuously increasing or continuously decreasing).
In this study, we have applied explicit descriptions to characterize the speciation and bioavailability of pollutants in ostracod bioassays performed using sediments from Flanders. Semiempirical toxic unit analyses elucidated the effects of heavy metals (esp. organotin) and ammonia inhibiting H. incongruens growth. Based on standard approaches, 26% of the variance in the observed effect could be explained. Yet, by acknowledging speciation and interactions between bioassay constituents, we can explain up to 90%. Organotin and ammonia appear more and less toxic, respectively, than what is reported in the existing literature for controlled (single-substance) laboratory tests. We can attribute this to a cascade of bio-physicochemical interactions affecting speciation and transformations of the chemicals in situ. Prominently, organotins appear to bioaccumulate during the molting process of H. incongruens. Future modeling ought to focus on the factors controlling the interactions, via more explicit measurement and monitoring of speciation and bioavailability. This is likely to help in bridging the gap between laboratory and field tests so as to enable a more reliable risk assessment for sediments. Despite the need for further study, we deem our model a worthwhile complementary method to evaluate sediments in Flanders. Applying the approach to more spatiotemporal and geochemical settings11,161 will evaluate its broader applicability. Thus, we deem it a starting point for more integrated ecotoxicity modeling in general.
Acknowledgments
“Sullied Sediments” has been co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund through the Interreg VB North Sea Region Programme with a grant of 2,043,413 euros with equivalent match funding from the partners involved. The project partnership includes public, private, and third sector organizations based in the United Kingdom, Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands. We thank the reviewers for their thoughtful comments and efforts that helped us to improve our manuscript.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c02855.
Figure S1: VMM monitoring network for sediment quality assessment. Table S1: Mean characteristics and chemical concentration of sediment samples in Flanders and its three main rivers. Figure S2: Trend of the monthly maximum ammonia concentration. Figure S3: Concentrations of ammonia throughout Flanders. Table S2: Proton dissociation constants (pKa) values. Table S3: Experimental H. incongruens effect concentrations (EC) of chemicals. Figure S4: Total concentration of chromium in sediment (as predicted from metal concentrations, so to prevent bias) versus MLR results using %clay, %OS, KjN, O2, PT, and pH as input. Figure S5: % growth inhibition of H. incongruens versus the TU before empirical calibration. Figure S6: % growth inhibition of H. incongruens versus the TU after empirical calibration. Figure S7: H. incongruens toxic units for different chemicals. Figure S8: H. incongruens toxic units for different chemicals. Table S4: Aqueous concentrations of chemicals and corresponding toxic units (TUs) calculated. Figure S9: Correlation coefficients between chemicals, bioassays, and sediment characteristics Figure S10: Calculation of TBT cation concentration at pH 7.5. Figure S11: Calculation of HPO42– concentrations at pH 7.5. Figure S12: Calculation of the NH3 concentration at pH 7.5. Figure S13: Ostracod mortality (%) versus ostracod growth inhibition (PDF)
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Vandecasteele B.; De Vos B.; Tack F. M. G. Heavy metal contents in surface soils along the Upper Scheldt river (Belgium) affected by historical upland disposal of dredged materials. Sci. Total Environ. 2002, 290, 1–14. 10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00966-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- European Environmental Agency Heavy metal emissions: Fig. 1 - Trends in emissions of heavy metals (EEA-33). Prod: IND-171-en (AIR 001). https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/eea32-heavy-metal-hm-emissions-1/assessment-10.
- de Souza Machado A. A.; Spencer K.; Kloas W.; Toffolon M.; Zarfl C. Metal fate and effects in estuaries: A review and conceptual model for better understanding of toxicity. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 541, 268–281. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brils J. Sediment monitoring and the European Water Framework Directive. Ann Ist Super Sanita 2008, 44, 218–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zoppini A.; Ademollo N.; Amalfitano S.; Casella P.; Patrolecco L.; Polesello S. Organic priority substances and microbial processes in river sediments subject to contrasting hydrological conditions. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 484, 74–83. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Teuchies J.; Bervoets L.; Cox T. J. S.; Meire P.; de Deckere E. The effect of waste water treatment on river metal concentrations: removal or enrichment?. J. Soils Sediments 2011, 11, 364–372. 10.1007/s11368-010-0321-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Community 2000, L 327, 1–73. [Google Scholar]
- de Zwart D.; Posthuma L.; Gevrey M.; von der Ohe P. C.; de Deckere E. Diagnosis of ecosystem impairment in a multiple-stress context--how to formulate effective river basin management plans. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. 2009, 5, 38–49. 10.1897/IEAM_2008-030.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chapma P. M.; Ho K. T.; Munns W. R. Jr.; Solomon K.; Weinstein M. P. Issues in sediment toxicity and ecological risk assessment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2002, 44, 271–278. 10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00329-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davoren M.; Shúilleabháin S. N.; O’Halloran J.; Hartl M. G. J.; Sheehan D.; O’Brien N. M.; van Pelt F. N. A. M.; Mothersill C. A test battery approach for the ecotoxicological evaluation of estuarine sediments. Ecotoxicology 2005, 14, 741–755. 10.1007/s10646-005-0022-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hiki K.; Tobino T.; Nakajima F.; Tsukahara K. Duration of life-cycle toxicity tests with the ostracod Heterocypris incongruens. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2017, 36, 3443–3449. 10.1002/etc.3931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chapman P. M.; Anderson J. A decision-making framework for sediment contamination. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2005, 1, 163–173. 10.1897/2005-013R.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Deckere E.; de Cooman W.; Florus M.; Devroede-Vanderlinden M.. A manual for the assessment of sediments in Falnders with the TRIAD approach. Ministery of the Flemish Community, Brussels 2000.
- Hutchinson T. H.; Solbe J.; Kloepper-Sams P. J. Analysis of the ecetoc aquatic toxicity (EAT) database III — Comparative toxicity of chemical substances to different life stages of aquatic organisms. Chemosphere 1998, 36, 129–142. 10.1016/S0045-6535(97)10025-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vaal M. A.; Van Leeuwen C. J.; Hoekstra J. A.; Hermens J. L. M. Variation in Sensitivity of Aquatic Species to Toxicants: Practical Consequences for Effect Assessment of Chemical Substances. Environ. Manage. 2000, 25, 415–423. 10.1007/s002679910033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martín F.; Escoto; Fernández J.; Fernández E.; Arco E.; Sierra M.; Dorronsoro C. Toxicity Assessment of Sediments with Natural Anomalous Concentrations in Heavy Metals by the Use of Bioassay. Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 2010, 1–6. 10.1155/2010/101390. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rämö R. A.; van den Brink P. J.; Ruepert C.; Castillo L. E.; Gunnarsson J. S. Environmental risk assessment of pesticides in the River Madre de Dios, Costa Rica using PERPEST, SSD, and msPAF models. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 13254–13269. 10.1007/s11356-016-7375-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shirani M.; Afzali K. N.; Jahan S.; Strezov V.; Soleimani-Sardo M. Pollution and contamination assessment of heavy metals in the sediments of Jazmurian playa in southeast iran. Nat. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1. 10.1038/s41598-020-61838-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hsu L. C.; Huang C. Y.; Chuang Y. H.; Chen H. W.; Chan Y. T.; Teah H. Y.; Chen T. Y.; Chang C. F.; Liu Y. T.; Tzou Y. M. Accumulation of heavy metals and trace elements in fluvial sediments received effluents from traditional and semiconductor industries. Nat. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 34250. 10.1038/srep34250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansen D. J.; Berry W. J.; Boothman W. S.; Pesch C. E.; Mahony J. D.; Di Toro D. M.; Robson D. L.; Ankley G. T.; Ma D.; Yan Q. Predicting the toxicity of metal-contaminated field sediments using interstitial concentration of metals and acid-volatile sulfide normalizations. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1996, 15, 2080–2094. 10.1002/etc.5620151204. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Oguma A. Y.; Klerks P. L. Comparisons Between Laboratory Sediment Toxicity Test Results and Assessment of Benthic Community Changes for a Lake with Mild Metal Contamination. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2019, 78, 106. 10.1007/s00244-019-00692-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brix K. V.; Gerdes R. M.; Adams W. J.; Grosell M. Effects of copper, cadmium, and zinc on the hatching success of brine shrimp (Artemia franciscana). Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2006, 51, 580–583. 10.1007/s00244-005-0244-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vane C. H.; Tumer G. H.; Chenery S. R.; Richardson M.; Cave M. C.; Terrington R.; Gowing C. J. B.; Moss-Hayes V. Trends in heavy metals, polychlorinated biphenyls and toxicity from sediment cores of the inner River Thames estuary, London, UK. Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts 2020, 22, 364–380. 10.1039/C9EM00430K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parrott J. L.; Raine J. C.; McMaster M. E.; Hewitt L. M. Chronic toxicity of oil sands tailings pond sediments to early life stages of fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Heliyon 2019, 5, e02509 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barrera Herrera J. A.; Espinosa A. J.; Álvarez J. P. Pollution in Lago de Tota, Colombia: acute toxicity on Daphnia magna (Cladocera: Daphniidae) and Hydra attenuata (Hydroida: Hydridae). Rev. Biol. Trop. 2019, 67, 11–23. 10.15517/rbt.v67i1.33573. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Babić S.; Barišić J.; Stipaničev D.; Repec S.; Lovrić M.; Malev O.; Martinović-Weigelt D.; Čož-Rakovac R.; Klobučar G. Assessment of river sediment toxicity: Combining empirical zebrafish embryotoxicity testing with in silico toxicity characterization. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 643, 435–450. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Besser J. M.; Steevens J.; Kunz J. L.; Brumbaugh W. G.; Ingersoll C. G.; Cox S.; Mebane C.; Balistrieri L.; Sinclair J.; MacDonald D. Characterizing toxicity of metal-contaminated sediments from the Upper Columbia River, Washington, USA, to benthic invertebrates. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2018, 37, 3102–3114. 10.1002/etc.4276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Long E. R.; Macdonald D. D.; Smith S. L.; Calder F. D. Incidence of Adverse Biological Effects within Ranges of Chemical Concentrations in Marine and Estuarine Sediments. Environ. Manage. 1995, 19, 81–97. 10.1007/BF02472006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vink J. P. M. The origin of speciation: Trace metal kinetics over natural water/sediment interfaces and the consequences for bioaccumulation. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 519–527. 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.09.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bootsma H. P.; Vink J. P. M.. Simple equations for the calculation of free metal ion activities in natural surface waters 2016.
- Van den Bril B.; Meremans D.; Roekens E. A Monitoring Network on Acidification in Flanders, Belgium. Sci. World J. 2011, 11, 2358–2363. 10.1100/2011/897308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vannevel R.; Brosens D.; De Cooman W.; Gabriels W.; Lavens F.; Mertens J.; Vervaeke B. The inland water macro-invertebrate occurrences in Flanders, Belgium. Zookeys 2018, 759, 117–136. 10.3897/zookeys.759.24810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- VLM eindrapport “milieukundig en economisch verantwoord fosforgebruik”; APLM/2014/3 in opdracht van VLM /29.01.2019: 2019.
- Struyf D.voortgangsrapport Mestbank 2010 over het mestbeleid in vlaanderen; 2010.
- Nolte T. M.; De Cooman W.; Vink J.P.; Hendriks A. J., Nitrogen-chromium interactions driving Hyalella azteca mortality when exposed to Flanders’ sediments. under review 2020.
- Hunting E. R.; de Jong S.; Vijver M. G.. Assessment of monitoring tools and strategies safeguarding aquatic ecosystems within the European water framework directive; CML-rapport 192, ISBN: 978-90-5191-182-4; Leiden, 2017.
- de Paiva Magãlhaes D.; da Costa Marques M. R.; Baptista D. F.; Buss D. F. Selecting a sensitive battery of bioassays to detect toxic effects of metals in effluents. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 110, 73–81. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bondarenko O. M.; Heinlaan M.; Sihtmäe M.; Ivask A.; Kurvet I.; Joonas E.; Jemec A.; Mannerström M.; Heinonen T.; Rekulapelly R.; Singh S.; Zou J.; Pyykkö I.; Drobne D.; Kahru A. Multilaboratory evaluation of 15 bioassays for (eco)toxicity screening and hazard ranking of engineered nanomaterials: FP7 project NANOVALID. Nanotoxicology 2016, 10, 1229–1242. 10.1080/17435390.2016.1196251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruiz F.; Abad M.; Bodergat A. M.; Carbonel P.; Rodríguez-Lázaro J.; González-Regalado M. L.; Toscano A.; García E. X.; Prenda J. Freshwater ostracods as environmental tracers. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 10, 1115–1128. 10.1007/s13762-013-0249-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gruiz K.; Molnar M.. Aquatic toxicology. In Engineering Tools for Environmental Risk Management: 2. Environmental Toxicology, 1st. ed.; Gruiz K.; Meggyes T.; Fenyvesi E., Ed.; CRC Press: 2015; 168. [Google Scholar]
- De Cooman W.; Blaise C.; Janssen C.; Detemmerman L.; Elst R.; Persoone G. History and sensitivity comparison of two standard whole-sediment toxicity tests with crustaceans: the amphipod Hyalella azteca and the ostracod Heterocypris incongruens microbiotest. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems 2015, 416, 15. 10.1051/kmae/2015011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mercury threat in industrially impacted surface water bodies in Romania – integrated approach (MERCURO). SNSF/UEFISCDI 2014.
- Becouze-Lareure C.; Bazin C.; Namour P.; Breil P.; Perrodin Y. Multi-Level Approach of the Ecotoxicological Impact of a Combined Sewer Overflow on a Peri-Urban Stream. J Water Resour. Prot. 2012, 984–992. 10.4236/jwarp.2012.411114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wolska L.; Namiesnik J.; Michalska M.; Bartoszewicz M. Preliminary Study on Toxicity of Aquatic Ecosystems in Bug River Basin. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2008, 17, 811–816. [Google Scholar]
- MicroBioTests, OSTRACODTOXKIT F: “Direct contact” Toxicity Test for Freshwater Sediments Standard Operating Procedure V071211. Gent, Belgium.
- Vogt É. L.; Model J. F. A.; Vinagre A. S. Effect of Organotins on Crustaceans: Update and Perspective. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 65. 10.3389/fendo.2018.00065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alzieu C.; Michel P.. L’étain et les organoétains en milieu marin: biogéochimie et ecotoxicologie. Repères Océan, Edit IFREMER1998,15, 104
- Parmentier K. F. V.; Verhaegen Y.; De Witt B. P.; Hoffman S.; Delbare D. H. R.; Roose P. M.; Hyiland K. D. E.; Burgeot T.; Smagghe G. J.; Cooreman K. Tributyltin: A Bottom-Up Regulator of the Crangon crangon Population?. Front. Mar. Sci. 2019, 6, 633. 10.3389/fmars.2019.00633. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yu N.; Chen S.; Li E.; Chen J.; Chen L. Tolerance of Physocypria kraepelini (Crustacean, Ostracoda) to water-borne ammonia, phosphate and pH value. J. Environ. Sci. 2009, 21, 1575–1580. 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62458-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karanovic I.Recent Freshwater Ostracods of the World: Crustacea, Ostracoda, Podocopida; Springer: Heidelberg, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Hendriks A. J. Modeling Response of Species to Microcontaminants - Comparative Ecotoxicology by (Sub)Lethal Body Burdens as a Function of Species Size and Partition Ratio of Chemicals. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1995, 32, 103–130. 10.1006/eesa.1995.1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hutchinson G. E.A treatise on limnology - geography, physics, and chemistry; Wiley &Sons: 1957; 1. [Google Scholar]
- van Beusekom J. E. E.; de Jonge V. N. Long-term changes in Wadden Sea nutrient cycles: importance of organic matter import from the North Sea. Hydrobiologia 2002, 475, 185–194. 10.1007/978-94-017-2464-7_15. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng X.; Zeng Y.; Guo Z.; Zhu L. Diffusion of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Across the Sediment-Water Interface and In Seawater at Aquaculture Areas of Daya Bay, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 1557–1572. 10.3390/ijerph110201557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Serajuddin M.; Chowdury A.; Hussain M. Increasing Level of Ammonia in the Surface Raw Water Source at Dhaka, Bangladesh. Pollution 2018, 4, 211–225. 10.22059/POLL.2017.240177.303. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Departement Landbouw en Visserij PRAKTIJKGIDS BEMESTING Grasland en voedergewassen 28.01.2016; Van Liefferinge J., 2016.
- Hendriks C.; Kranenburg R.; Kuenen J. J. P.; Van den Bril B.; Verguts V.; Schaap M. Ammonia emission time profiles based on manure transport data improve ammonia modelling across north western Europe. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 131, 83–96. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Van den Broeck D. H. M.; Verbeylen G.; Jacobs I.; Van Dorsselaer P.. Korstmossen als bio-indicator voor ammoniakconcentraties (Eindrapport); Rapport 2009/5; Mechelen, België, 2009.
- EPA Ecological Effects Test Guidelines. OPPTS 850.1735 Whole Sediment Acute Toxicity Invertebrates Freshwater; 1996.
- Van Der Kooij L. A.; Van De Meent D.; Van Leeuwen C. J.; Bruggeman W. A. Deriving quality criteria for water and sediment from the results of aquatic toxicity tests and product standards: Application of the equilibrium partitioning method. Water Res. 1991, 25, 697–705. 10.1016/0043-1354(91)90045-R. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tebes-Stevens C. L.; Jones W. J. Estimation of microbial reductive transformation rates for chlorinated benzenes and phenols using a quantitative structure-activity relationship approach. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2004, 23, 1600–1609. 10.1897/03-282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mackin J. E.; Aller R. C. Ammonium Adsorption in Marine-Sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1984, 29, 250–257. 10.4319/lo.1984.29.2.0250. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Van Raaphorst W.; Malschaert J. F. P. Ammonium adsorption in superficial North Sea sediments. Cont. Shelf Res. 1996, 16, 1415–1435. 10.1016/0278-4343(95)00081-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ceazan M. L.; Thurman E. M.; Smith R. L. Retardation of Ammonium and Potassium-Transport through a Contaminated Sand and Gravel Aquifer - the Role of Cation-Exchange. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1989, 23, 1402–1408. 10.1021/es00069a012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Seitzinger S. P.; Gardner W. S.; Spratt A. K. The Effect of Salinity on Ammonium Sorption in Aquatic Sediments - Implications for Benthic Nutrient Recycling. Estuaries 1991, 14, 167–174. 10.2307/1351690. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J. Z.; Huang X. L. Effect of Temperature and Salinity on Phosphate Sorption on Marine Sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 6831–6837. 10.1021/es200867p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100 L/kg represents concentrations of 10−100 mg exchangeable P/kg sediment. Depending on concentration and whether the value represents P or PO4, Kd widely differs: Kd = 160,000 L/kg for P (Tang et al. 2017) and Kd = 2,500 for inorganic PO4 in the River Great Ouse, England (Prastka et al. 1998).
- Crommentuijn T.; Polder M. D.; van de Plassche E. J.. Maximum Permissible Concentrations and Negligible Concentrations for metals, taking background concentrations into account; National Institute of Public Health and the Environment: Bilthoven, the Netherlands, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang C.; Yu Z. G.; Zeng G. M.; Jiang M.; Yang Z. Z.; Cui F.; Zhu M. Y.; Shen L. Q.; Hu L. Effects of sediment geochemical properties on heavy metal bioavailability. Environ. Int. 2014, 73, 270–281. 10.1016/j.envint.2014.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruijn J. H. M.; Denneman C. A. J.. Achtergrondgehalten van negen sporen-metalen in oppervlaktewater, grondwater en grond van Nederland; 1992.
- Kim S.; Thiessen P. A.; Bolton E. E.; Chen J.; Fu G.; Gindulyte A.; Han L.; He J.; He S.; Shoemaker B. A.; Wang J.; Yu B.; Zhang J.; Bryant S. H. PubChem Substance and Compound databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D1202–D1213. 10.1093/nar/gkv951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mackay D.; Shiu W. Y.; Ma K. C.; Lee S. C.. Handbook of physical-chemical properties and environmental fate for organic chemicals; CRC Press Inc.: Boca Raton, USA, 2006; 4216. [Google Scholar]
- Arnold C. G.Triorganotin Compounds in Natural Waters and Sediments: Aqueous Speciation and Sorption Mechanisms Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich; 1998.
- Henriksen K.; Rasmussen M. B.; Jensen A. Effect of Bioturbation on Microbial Nitrogen Transformations in the Sediment and Fluxes of Ammonium and Nitrate to the Overlaying Water. Ecol. Bull. 1983, 35, 193–205. [Google Scholar]
- Berg M.; Arnold C. G.; Müller S. R.; Mühlemann J.; Schwarzenbach R. P. Sorption and desorption behavior of organotin compounds in sediment-pore water systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 3151–3157. 10.1021/es010010f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiao X.; Sheng G. D.; Qiu Y. Improved Understanding of Tributyltin Sorption on Natural and Biochar-Amended Sediments. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2011, 30, 2682–2687. 10.1002/etc.672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- USEPA Ecotox Database.
- Ankley G. T.; Schubauer-Berigan M. K.; Monson P. D. Influence of pH and hardness on toxicity of ammonia to the amphipod Hyalella azteca. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1995, 52, 2078–2083. 10.1139/f95-801. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bowen H. J. M.; Blunden S. J.; Hobbs L. A.; Smith P. J. The environmental chemistry of organotin compounds. Environ. Chem. 1984, 3, 49–77. 10.1039/9781847556004-00049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fent K. Ecotoxicology of organotin compounds. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 1996, 26, 3–117. 10.3109/10408449609089891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meador J. P.Predicting the fate and effects of tributyltin in marine systems: Section IV. Bioaccumulation A. Tissue-Water Partitioning. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology: Ware G. W., Ed., Springer: New York, USA, 2000; 166, 1–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fang L.; Borggaard O. K.; Christensen J. H.; Holm P. E.; Hansen H. C. B. Adsorption of mono- and di-butyltin by a wheat charcoal: pH effects and modeling. Chemosphere 2012, 89, 863–868. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beyer W. N.; Meador J. P.. Environmental Contaminants in Biota: Interpreting Tissue Concentrations. 2nd ed.; CRC Press: 2011, 10.1201/b10598. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mohamed M.; Mohamed A.; Shoukry M. M. Interaction of diphenyltin(IV) dichloride with some selected bioligands. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2001, 49, 253–257. 10.1248/cpb.49.253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berry W. J.; Boothman W. S.; Serbst J. R.; Edwards P. A. Predicting the toxicity of chromium in sediments. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2004, 23, 2981–2992. 10.1897/03-599.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Besser J. M.; Brumbaugh W. G.; Kemble N. E.; May T. W.; Ingersoll C. G. Effects of sediment characteristics on the toxicity of chromium(III) and chromium(VI) to the amphipod, Hyalella azteca. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 6210–6216. 10.1021/es049715i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu Y.; Chen N.; Li M.; Feng C.; Liu T. Insights into simultaneous microbial chromium and nitrate reduction: inhibitory effects and molecular mechanisms. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2019, 94, 2589–2596. 10.1002/jctb.6056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chovanec P.; Sparacino-Watkins C.; Zhang N.; Basu P.; Stolz J. F. Microbial reduction of chromate in the presence of nitrate by three nitrate respiring organisms. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 416. 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Viamajala S.; Peyton B. M.; Apel W. A.; Petersen J. N. Chromate/nitrite interactions in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1: Evidence for multiple hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] reduction mechanisms dependent on physiological growth conditions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 78, 770–778. 10.1002/bit.10261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang S.; Choi J. H. Simulating fate and transport of chromium in saturated sediments. Appl. Math. Model. 2013, 37, 102–111. 10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rosales R. M.; Faz A.; Gómez-Garrido M.; Muñoz M. A.; Murcia F. J.; González V.; Acosta J. A. Geochemical speciation of chromium related to sediments properties in the riverbed contaminated by tannery effluents. J. Soils Sediments 2017, 17, 1437–1448. 10.1007/s11368-016-1412-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hassan S. M.; Garrison A. W. Distribution of chromium species between soil and porewater. Chem. Speciation Bioavailability 1996, 8, 85–103. 10.1080/09542299.1996.11083273. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Blunden S. J.; Chapman A.. Organomettalic Compounds in the Environment. Principles and Reactions; Craig P. J. E., Ed. Longman Group Ltd.: Essex, U.K., 1986; 111–159. [Google Scholar]
- Nikinmaa M.What Causes Aquatic Contamination?. In An Introduction to Aquatic Toxicology; Elsevier: 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Kudl̷ak B.; Wolska L.; Namieśnik J. Determination of EC50 toxicity data of selected heavy metals toward Heterocypris incongruens and their comparison to ″direct-contact″ and microbiotests. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 174, 509–516. 10.1007/s10661-010-1474-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yulievna S. N.; Rinatovna L. T.; Victorovna N. L. Comparison of Toxicity of Sediments from Rivers with Different Levels of Anthropogenic Load (Middle Volga Region, Russia) Based on Elutriate and Whole Sediment Tests. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta-Seriya Estestvennye Nauki 2016, 158, 416–439. [Google Scholar]
- Khangarot B. S.; Das S. Acute toxicity of metals and reference toxicants to a freshwater ostracod, Cypris subglobosa Sowerby, 1840 and correlation to EC50 values of other test models. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 172, 641–649. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Zwart D.; Posthuma L. Complex mixture toxicity for single and multiple species: proposed methodologies. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2005, 24, 2665–2676. 10.1897/04-639R.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Regenmortel T.; Nys C.; Janssen C. R.; Lofts S.; De Schamphelaere K. A. C. Comparison of Four Methods for Bioavailability-Based Risk Assessment of Mixtures of Cu, Zn, and Ni in Freshwater. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2017, 36, 2123–2138. 10.1002/etc.3746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sprague J. B. Measurement of pollutant toxicity to fish. II. Utilizing and applying bioassay results. Water Res. 1970, 4, 3–32. 10.1016/0043-1354(70)90018-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- International Organization for Standardization ISO 14371. Water quality: Determination of freshwater sediment toxicity to Hetrocypris incongruens (Crustacea, Ostracoda). 2012.
- Chial B.; Persoone G. Cyst-based toxicity tests XII--development of a short chronic sediment toxicity test with the ostracod crustacean Heterocypris incongruens: selection of test parameters. Environ. Toxicol. 2002, 17, 520–527. 10.1002/tox.10085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruz P. M.; Hidalgo P.; Yáñez S.; Escribano R.; Keister J. E. Egg production and hatching success of Calanus chilensis and Acartia tonsa in the northern Chile upwelling zone (23°S), Humboldt Current System. J. Mar. Syst. 2015, 148, 200–212. 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2015.03.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Raikow D. F.; Reid D. F.; Blatchley E. R.; Jacobs G.; Landrum P. F. Effects of proposed physical ballast tank treatments on aquatic invertebrate resting eggs. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2007, 26, 717–725. 10.1897/06-403R.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim Y.; Mo H.; Son J.; Lee Y.; Lee S.; Cho K. Interactive effects of water pH and hardness levels on the growth and reproduction of Heterocypris incongruens (Crustacea: Ostracoda). Hydrobiologia 2015, 753, 97–109. 10.1007/s10750-015-2199-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chial B.; Persoone G. Cyst-based toxicity tests XIII - Development of a short chronic sediment toxicity test with the ostracod crustacean Heterocypris incongruens: Methodology and precision. Environ. Toxicol. 2002, 17, 528–532. 10.1002/tox.10086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- EPA Consideration of the FQPA safety factor and other uncertainty factors in cumulative risk assessment of chemicals charing a common mechanism of toxicity; Washington, 2002.
- de Vries W.; Schütze G.; Lofts S.; Meili M.; Römkens P. F. A. M.; Farret R.; De Temmerman L.; Jakubowski M.. Critical limits for cadmium, lead and mercury related to ecotoxicological effects on soil organisms, aquatic organisms, plants, animals and humans. In Proceedings expert meeting on critical limits for heavy metals and methods for their application, Berlin, Germany, 2–4 December 2002. Expert meeting on critical limits for heavy metals and methods for their application; Berlin (Germany), Umweltbundesamt: 2003; 29–78. [Google Scholar]
- Song C. W.; Griffin R. J.; Park H. J.. Influence of Tumor pH on Therapeutic Response. In Cancer Drug Resistance; Humana Press: 2006; 21-42, 10.1007/978-1-59745-035-5_2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Carter N. W. Intracellular pH. Kidney Int. 1972, 1, 341–346. 10.1038/ki.1972.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White J. S.; Tobin J. M. Role of speciation in organotin toxicity to the yeast Candida maltosa. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 3877–3884. 10.1021/es030099k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsuda T.; Aoki S.; Kojima M.; Harada H. The influence of pH on the accumulation of tri-n-butyltin chloride and triphenyltin chloride in carp. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1990, 95, 151–153. 10.1016/0742-8413(90)90096-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arnold C. G.; Weidenhaupt A.; David M. M.; Müller S. R.; Haderlein S. B.; Schwarzenbach R. P. Aqueous speciation and 1-octanol-water partitioning of tributyl- and triphenyltin: Effect of pH and ion composition. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997, 31, 2596–2602. 10.1021/es970009+. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hunziker R. W.; Escher B. I.; Schwarzenbach R. P. pH dependence of the partitioning of triphenyltin and tributyltin between phosphatidylcholine liposomes and water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 3899–3904. 10.1021/es010043v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fent K.Effects of organotin compounds in fish: from the molecular to the population level. In Fish Ecotoxicology; Braunbeck T.; Hinton D. E.; Streit B., Ed. Birkhauser Verlag: basel, Switzerland, 1998; 265–267. [Google Scholar]
- Escher B. I.; Ashauer R.; Dyer S.; Hermens L. J. M.; Lee J.-H.; Leslie H. A.; Mayer P.; Meador J. P.; Warne M. S. J. Crucial role of mechanisms and modes of toxic action for understanding tissue residue toxicity and internal effect concentrations of organic chemicals. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manage. 2010, 7, 28–49. 10.1002/ieam.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verhaegen Y.Mechanism, Concentrations and Effects of Tributyltin in Common Shrimp Crangon crangon; Ghent University: Ghent, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Verhaegen Y.; Parmentier K.; Swevers L.; Rougé P.; Soin T.; De Coen W.; Cooreman K.; Smagghe G. The brown shrimp (Crangon crangon L.) ecdysteroid receptor complex: Cloning, structural modeling of the ligand-binding domain and functional expression in an EcR-deficient Drosophila cell line. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2010, 168, 415–423. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2010.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song Y.; Villeneuve D. L.; Toyota K.; Iguchi T.; Tollefsen K. E. Ecdysone Receptor Agonism Leading to Lethal Molting Disruption in Arthropods: Review and Adverse Outcome Pathway Development. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 4142–4157. 10.1021/acs.est.7b00480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yavuzatmaca M.; Kulkoyluoglu O.; Yilmaz O.; Akdemir D. On the Relationship of Ostracod Species (Crustacea) to Shallow Water Ion and Sediment Phosphate Concentration Across Different Elevational Range (Sinop, Turkey). Turkish J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2017, 17, 1333–1346. [Google Scholar]
- Keyser D.; Walter R. Calcification in ostracodes. Revista Española de Micropaleontología 2004, 36, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Mulligan R. M. Metastatic Calcification. Arch. Pathol. 1947, 43, 177–230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lotsari A.; Rajasekharan A. K.; Halvarsson M.; Andersson M. Transformation of amorphous calcium phosphate to bone-like apatite. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4170. 10.1038/s41467-018-06570-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mekmene O.; Touillon T.; Bouler J.-M.; Piot M.; Gaucheron F. Effects of pH and Ca/P molar ratio on the quantity and crystalline structure of calcium phosphates obtained from aqueous solutions. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2009, 89, 301–316. 10.1051/dst/2009019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Willard L. L.Chemical equilibria in soils. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Word J.; Moore D.; Irwin M. A.; Cooper A. Acute and Chronic Toxicity of Ammonia to the Amphipod Hyalella azteca under Hard Water Conditions. Soil Sediment Contam. 2002, 11, 487–488. 10.1080/20025891108130. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson B.; Nicely P.; Gilbert K.; Kosaka R.; Hunt J.; Phillips B.. Overview of Freshwater and Marine Toxicity Tests: A technical tool for ecological rish assessment; Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California Davis: 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Weihrauch D.; Fehsenfeld S.; Quijada-Rodriguez A.. 1.2.2 Toxicity of Ammonia in Crustaceans. In Acid-Base Balance and Nitrogen Excretion in Invertebrates - Mechanisms and strategies in various invetebrate groups with considerations of challenges caused by ocean acidification, Weihrauch D.; O’Donnel M., Ed.; Springer: 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Monfort P.; Kosenko E.; Erceg S.; Canales J. J.; Felipo V. Molecular mechanism of acute ammonia toxicity: role of NMDA receptors. Neurochem. Int. 2002, 41, 95–102. 10.1016/S0197-0186(02)00029-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li M.; Costello D. M.; Burton G. A. Interactive effects of phosphorus and copper on Hyalella azteca via periphyton in aquatic ecosystems. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2012, 83, 41–46. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chu K. W.; Chow K. L. Synergistic toxicity of multiple heavy metals is revealed by a biological assay using a nematode and its transgenic derivative. Aquat. Toxicol. 2002, 61, 53–64. 10.1016/S0166-445X(02)00017-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamaya Y.; Takada T.; Suzuki K. Effect of medium phosphate levels on the sensitivity of Selenastrum capricomutum to chemicals. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2004, 73, 995–1000. 10.1007/s00128-004-0524-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daneshgar S.; Buttafava A.; Capsoni D.; Callegari A.; Capodaglio A. G. Impact of pH and Ionic Molar Ratios on Phosphorous Forms Precipitation and Recovery from Different Wastewater Sludges. Resources 2018, 7, 71. 10.3390/resources7040071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hynes M. J.; O’Dowd M. Interactions of the Trimethyltin(IV) Cation with Carboxylic-Acids, Amino-Acids, and Related Ligands. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1987, 3, 563–566. 10.1039/DT9870000563. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tsagkatakis I.; Chaniotakis N.; Altmann R.; Jurkschat K.; Willem R.; Martins J. C.; Qin Y.; Bakker E. Phosphate-binding characteristics and selectivity studies of bifunctional organotin carriers. Helv. Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 1952–1961. . [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ditsch L.; Swanson R.; Milun A. J.. Feasibility of liquid ion exchange for extracting phosphate from wastewater; 1970.
- Staniszewska M.; Radke B.; Namieśnik J.; Bolal̷ek J. Analytical methods and problems related to the determination of organotin compounds in marine sediments. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2008, 88, 747–774. 10.1080/03067310802082310. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Grigarick A. A.; Webster R. K.; Meyer R. P.; Zalom F. G.; Smith K. A.; Smith K. A.; Grigarick A. A. Effect of Pesticide Treatments on Nontarget Organisms in California Rice Paddies .1. Impact of Triphenyltin Hydroxide .2. Impact of Diflubenzuron and Triflumuron. Hilgardia 1990, 58, 1–36. 10.3733/hilg.v58n01p036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shoukry M. M.; Al-Alousi A.; Tarek S. M. Diorganotin(IV) Complexes with Methionine Methyl Ester. Equilibria and Displacement by DNA Constituents. S. Afr. J. Chem. 2014, 67, 94–98. [Google Scholar]
- Immel F.; Broussard C.; Catherinet B.; Plasseraud L.; Alcaraz G.; Bundeleva I.; Marin F. The Shell of the Invasive Bivalve Species Dreissena polymorpha: Biochemical, Elemental and Textural Investigations. PLoS One 2016, 11, e0154264. 10.1371/journal.pone.0154264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Milhau B.; Dekens N.; Wouters K.. Evaluation de l’utilisation des ostracodes comme bio-indicateurs potentiels de pollution; 1997.
- Pacioglu O.; Moldovan O. T. Response of invertebrates from the hyporheic zone of chalk rivers to eutrophication and land use. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 4729–4740. 10.1007/s11356-015-5703-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Danielopol D. L.; Geiger W.; Tölderer-Farmer M.; Orellana C. P.; Terrat M. N.. The Ostracoda of Mondsee: spatial and temporal changes during the last 50 years. In Contributions to the Paleolimnology of the Trumer Lakes (Salzburg) and Lake Mondsee, Attersee and Traunsee (Upper Austria); Limnologisches Institut der Osterreichischen Akademie der Wischenschaften: Mondsee, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Soucek D. J.; Dickinson A. Influence of chloride on the chronic toxicity of sodium nitrate to Ceriodaphnia dubia and Hyalella azteca. Ecotoxicology 2016, 25, 1406–1416. 10.1007/s10646-016-1691-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilbur S.; Abadin H.; Fay M.; Yu D.; Tencza B.; Ingerman L.; Klotzbach J.; James S.. Toxicological Profile for Chromium. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) Toxicological Profiles; 2012. [PubMed]
- Sangwan P.; Kumar V.; Gulati D.; Joshi U. N. Interactive effects of salicylic acid on enzymes of nitrogen metabolism in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) under chromium(VI) toxicity. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2015, 4, 309–314. 10.1016/j.bcab.2015.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fumasoli A.; Bürgmann H.; Weissbrodt D. G.; Wells G. F.; Beck K.; Mohn J.; Morgenroth E.; Udert K. M. Growth of Nitrosococcus-Related Ammonia Oxidizing Bacteria Coincides with Extremely Low pH Values in Wastewater with High Ammonia Content. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 6857–6866. 10.1021/acs.est.7b00392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strand J.; Jacobsen J. A. Accumulation and trophic transfer of organotins in a marine food web from the Danish coastal waters. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 350, 72–85. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.02.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elsenhans B.; Schuman K.; Forth W.. Metal-Metal Toxic Interactions. In Handbook of Hazardous Materials; Corn M., Ed.; Academic Press, Inc.: San Diego, 1993; p 435. [Google Scholar]
- Borgmann U.; Nowierski M.; Dixon D. G. Effect of major ions on the toxicity of copper to Hyalella azteca and implications for the biotic ligand model. Aquat. Toxicol. 2005, 73, 268–287. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2005.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hare L.; Carignan R.; Huerta-Diaz M. A. A Field-Study of Metal Toxicity and Accumulation by Benthic Invertebrates - Implications for the Acid Volatile Sulfide (Avs) Model. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1994, 39, 1653–1668. 10.4319/lo.1994.39.7.1653. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sun H.; Huang G.; Dal S. Adsorption behaviour and QSPR studies of organotin compounds on estuarine sediment. Chemosphere 1996, 33, 831–838. 10.1016/0045-6535(96)00238-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nolte T. M.; Ragas A. M. J. A review of quantitative structure-property relationships for the fate of ionizable organic chemicals in water matrices and identification of knowledge gaps. Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts 2017, 19, 221–246. 10.1039/C7EM00034K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tipping E. Humic ion-binding model VI: An improved description of the interactions of protons and metal ions with humic substances. Aquat. Geochem. 1998, 4, 3–47. 10.1023/A:1009627214459. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Verschoor A. J.; Vijver M. G.; Vink J. P. M. Refinement and Cross-Validation of Nickel Bioavailability in Pnec-Pro, a Regulatory Tool for Site-Specific Risk Assessment of Metals in Surface Water. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2017, 36, 2367–2376. 10.1002/etc.3772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vink J. P. M.; Meeussen J. C. L. BIOCHEM-ORCHESTRA: A tool for evaluating chemical speciation and ecotoxicological impacts of heavy metals on river flood plain systems. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 148, 833–841. 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.01.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sor R.; Boets P.; Lek S.; Goethals P. Spatio-temporal co-occurrence of alien and native molluscs: a modelling approach using physical-chemical predictors. Aquat. Invasions 2017, 12, 147–158. 10.3391/ai.2017.12.2.03. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Denys L. Relation of abundance-weighted averages of diatom indicator values to measured environmental conditions in standing freshwaters. Ecol. Indic. 2004, 4, 255–275. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2004.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Stoica C.; Gheorghe S.; Lucaciu E. I.; Stanescu E.; Paun C. I.; Niculescu L. D. The Impact of Chemical Compounds on Benthic Invertebrates from the Danube and Danube Delta Systems. Soil Sediment Contam. 2014, 23, 763–778. 10.1080/15320383.2014.870529. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zarcinas B. A.; Rogers S. L. Copper, lead and zinc mobility and bioavailability in a river sediment contaminated with paint stripping residue. Environ. Geochem. Health 2002, 24, 191–203. 10.1023/A:1016061407072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gao J. M.; Fu P. T.; Chen X. L.; Guo J. S.; Hou X. Y.; Zeng J.; Chen Z. M. Fate simulation and risk assessment of TBT and TPhT considering water level fluctuations in the TGR before and after AFS Convention implementation in China. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2020, 32, 16. 10.1186/s12302-020-0298-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





