Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2020 Oct 19;205(11):3122–3129. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1901482

Evaluation of interleukin-17D in host immunity to group A Streptococcus infection

Allen Washington Jr *, Nissi Varki *,, J Andrés Valderrama , Victor Nizet ‡,§, Jack D Bui *
PMCID: PMC7686091  NIHMSID: NIHMS1632804  PMID: 33077643

Abstract

Interleukin-17D (IL-17D) is a cytokine that belongs to the IL-17 family and is conserved in vertebrates and invertebrates. In contrast to IL-17A and IL-17F, which are expressed in Th-17 cells, IL-17D is expressed broadly in non-immune cells. IL-17D can promote immune responses to cancer and viruses in part by inducing chemokines and recruiting innate immune cells such as natural killer (NK) cells. Although bacterial infection can induce IL-17D in fish and invertebrates, the role of mammalian IL-17D in anti-bacterial immunity has not been established. To determine whether IL-17D has a role in mediating host defense against bacterial infections, we studied intraperitoneal infection by group A Streptococcus (GAS) in wild-type (WT) and Il17d−/− mice. Compared to WT animals, mice deficient in IL-17D experienced decreased survival, had greater weight loss, and showed increased bacterial burden in the kidney and peritoneal cavity following GAS challenge. In WT animals, IL-17D transcript was induced by GAS infection and correlated to increased levels of chemokine CCL2 and greater neutrophil recruitment. Of note, GAS-mediated IL-17D induction in non-immune cells required live bacteria, suggesting that processes beyond recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns were required for IL-17D induction. Based on our results, we propose a model in which non-immune cells can discriminate between non-viable and viable GAS cells, responding only to the latter by inducing IL-17D.

Keywords: Group A Streptococcus, IL-17D, Ccl2, neutrophils

Introduction

Interleukin (IL)-17 cytokines include six members (A-F) that exhibit functional roles in inflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer (1, 2). In contrast to IL-17A and IL-17F that are mostly expressed in T cells, IL-17D is expressed broadly outside of the hematopoietic compartment and has limited expression in bone marrow, thymus, and spleen (3). IL-17B and IL-17C are also expressed in non-immune cells and induce similar sets of downstream genes as IL-17A (36). IL-17A and IL-17C protect the host from various bacterial species in experimental infection models (711). IL-17E (aka IL-25), which is unlike other cytokines in the family, promotes T helper type 2 immune responses and mediates immunity against parasites (12). IL-17B, the least understood IL-17 member with respect to pathogen responses, antagonizes IL-17E signaling and thus may counteract excessive inflammatory processes (13).

We previously found IL-17D to have roles in anti-tumor and anti-viral immunity via induction of the chemokine CCL2 and recruitment of NK cells (1418). Additionally, we and others have shown that IL-17D induces some overlapping sets of genes downstream of IL-17A including IL-8 and CCL2 (3, 14). In experimental tumor models, exogenous or tumor-expressed IL-17D was sufficient to cause growth delay or tumor rejection (14, 15). IL-17D is regulated by the oxidative stress sensor nuclear factor erythroid-derived 2-like 2 (Nrf2) (16), and we have previously described that oxidative stressors and viral infection activate Nrf2, triggering IL-17D expression and immune cell recruitment (1618). Il17d−/− mice are consequently more susceptible to murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) infection and carcinogen-induced tumors (16, 17).

The role of IL-17D in anti-bacterial immunity is relatively unexplored in mammals, but studies of IL-17D homologs in fish and invertebrate animal models have suggested a protective role (1923). In fish, Il17d is expressed constitutively and further increased in response to gram negative bacterial challenge in organs such as the skin and head kidney (19, 20); similar responses have been demonstrated in marine invertebrates, such as oysters and amphioxus (23, 22). In addition, both gram negative live bacteria and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induce Il17d in skin cells of lampreys in vitro (21).

In mammals, IL-17 cytokines such as IL-17A and IL-17F are induced in CD4+ T cells by retinoic acid-related orphan nuclear receptor, RORγt and RORα (2426), epithelial cell IL-17C is induced in response to Gram-negative bacteria (4, 27), Similarly, IL-17E in epithelial cells is induced upon detecting extracellular helminths through succinate (28, 29). In mice, we found IL-17D to be induced by viral infection, constitutively expressed in immunogenic cancer cells, and directly induced by the anti-oxidant transcription factor Nrf2 (16, 17, 14). It is not clear whether bacterial infection or components induce IL-17D in mammalian systems.

Streptococcus pyogenes, also known as group A Streptococcus (GAS), is a leading Gram-positive human bacterial pathogen associated with a wide range of pathological outcomes, from simple pharyngitis and skin infection, to invasive necrotizing fasciitis and toxic shock syndrome, and importantly, to post-infectious sequelae including rheumatic heart disease and glomerulonephritis (3032). GAS expresses pore-forming toxins (including streptolysins S and O) and extracellular proteases that can induce cellular damage and organ system dysfunction during invasive infection (33, 30). A robust inflammatory response to GAS infection is catalyzed by release of cytokines by immune cells that sense bacterial components or cellular damage molecules (34, 35). GAS infection also stimulates generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (36, 37), a cellular mechanism of inhibition for bacterial replication that simultaneously promotes inflammatory cell death (38, 39, 34). Since ROS are known inducer molecules of IL-17D, we hypothesized that IL-17D would be induced and potentially play a protective role during GAS infection.

Materials & Methods

Mice

The UCSD Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all animal use and procedures (protocol #S06201). C57BL/6 and IL-17D-deficient (16, 17) mice were housed in specific pathogen-free conditions prior to use. Mice were between 6 and 12 weeks old and were age- and sex-matched across experiments.

In vivo group A Streptococcus (GAS) murine infection model

WT GAS strain 5448 was isolated from a patient with necrotizing fasciitis and toxic shock syndrome (40) and is representative of the globally disseminated serotype M1T1 clone that is the predominant cause of life-threatening invasive GAS infections (41). Mice were injected intraperitoneally with the indicated inoculum of GAS in a total volume of 200μL phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Each inoculum was prepared by growing GAS overnight in Todd-Hewitt broth (THB, Teknova) and adjusting the concentration according to the spectrophotometric O.D. 600 reading (35). Inoculum colony forming units (CFU) were confirmed by serial dilution plating on THB agar (THA). One-time injection of 200mg/kg N-Acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) in PBS was conducted 4 h prior to GAS infection. Anti-CCL2 polyclonal antibody or control IgG (R&D) was co-injected with GAS. For survival assessment, mice were monitored at least every 12 h to record the body weight and survey health status including signs of lethargy.

Peritoneal exudate and cells were collected by lavage with 2.5mL PBS. Biopsies of kidney, spleen, lung, and the heart of each mouse was collected to determine GAS burden. The tissues were weighed and homogenized in 1mL PBS or RPMI medium containing 2% FBS through a 70μm strainer. Homogenized tissues were serially diluted 10-fold, and 50μL or 10μL from each aliquot were cultured overnight on THA at 36.5°C. The measurement of CFU/g was determined based on total CFU in 1mL divided by the weight of organ; samples without a colony were arbitrarily assigned as 1 CFU/mL and divided by the weight of the organ in order to provide graphable non-zero data points.

In vitro group A Streptococcus (GAS) infection of cultured cells

Heat-killed GAS were prepared by placing bacteria at 65–75°C for 5–10 min; absence of CFU growth was confirmed by plating aliquots on THA. The multiplicity of infection (MOI) of GAS-to-cultured cells (immune and non-immune cells) was 1:1 unless specified. Peritoneal exudate cells (PEC, ~30% macrophages and ~40% B cells), F244 fibrosarcoma, and HEK293 cells were cultured in RPMI containing 10% FBS with penicillin and streptomycin and switched to 2% FBS without antibiotics the day before the experiment. PECs were collected by lavage using 2.5mL PBS or FACS buffer per peritoneum. Cell culture plates were spun at 1500 rpm for 5 min to facilitate contact between GAS and cultured cells. Cells were pre-treated for 1 h with either N-Acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) or ammonium pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC) at a concentration of 0.6 μM and 0.4 μM respectively (Sigma). Final concentration of peptidoglycan was prepared as 1μg/mL (Invivogen).

Flow cytometry experiments

Percentages of leukocytes within each sample were determined using a BD FACSCANTO flow cytometer. CD45 (30-F11), Ly6G (1A8) markers were employed to identify neutrophils; CD45, CD11bmid (M1–70) for monocytes; CD45, CD11bhigh, F4/80 (BM8) for macrophages; NK1.1 (PK136) for NK cells; CD3 (145–2C11) for T cells; CD45R (RA3–6B2) for B cells (all from Biolegend). Anti-CD192 (SA203G11) was used to identify CCR2-positive cells (Biolegend). 7AAD-positive cells were used to identify dead cells (Calbiochem).

Quantitative real-time PCR

RNA was extracted using TRI-zol (Life Technologies) or by using the Direct-zol RNA MiniPrep Kit (Zymogen). cDNA was synthesized using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems); qPCR data were generated using SYBR Green mix (Applied Biosystems) with forward and reverse primers of indicated genes; reaction was run on the One Step Plus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Ct values of Hprt or Gapdh reference gene of the vehicle or non-treated control samples were used in calculating the ΔΔCt in order to determine the 2−ΔΔCt values. Primer sequences are listed in Supplemental Table 1.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Biopsies of kidney from WT and Il17d−/− mice were weighed and homogenized in 1mL PBS through a 70μm strainer. Tissue lysates were prepared by using RIPA buffer (Teknova) with protease inhibitor and samples within the same experiment was normalized using Pierce BCA Protein Assay kit (Thermo Fisher). Protein CCL2 was measured using a Quantikine ELISA kit (R&D) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Standard curve was generated and applied to calculate pg/mL CCL2 and fold difference was determined over mock infection.

Cytokine injection

C57BL/6 mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions. 0.5μg of IL-17D or IL-17A (R&D) in 250μL PBS or vehicle in PBS were i.p. injected in each mouse. Bioactivity of these cytokines was confirmed previously in vivo (14). Heat-inactivated IL-17D was prepared by heating at 60°C for 30 min. Mice were euthanized using carbon dioxide, and peritoneal cavity was lavaged several times in total 10mL PBS containing 1% FBS. Cells were incubated in RBC lysis buffer (Biolegend) and counted using the hemocytometer. In order to quantitate chemokine transcripts in mesothelial cells, peritoneal wall tissue was minced with scissors prior to the extraction of RNA. In order to analyze the mesothelial cell composition by flow cytometry, peritoneal wall tissues were minced with scissors and digested with collagenase (Worthington) in medium overnight at 36.5°C.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were processed through a statistical software package (GraphPad Prism). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated and analyzed using the log-rank test in order to assess statistical significance. CFU data from organ homogenates and lavage were analyzed using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. In vitro GAS incubation experiments were analyzed using the Student’s two-tailed t-test. All P-values less than 0.05 were considered to be significant. ns = not significant. P values are denoted in figures as: *, P<0.05; **,P<0.01; ***,P<0.001.

Results

Recombinant IL-17D induces ccl2 and recruitment of innate immune cells into the peritoneum

We hypothesized that IL-17D promotes rapid immune responses in part by inducing chemokines such as CCL2 and recruiting neutrophils. To establish our in vivo model system, we first tested the response of C57BL/6 wild type mice to administration of purified recombinant IL-17D into the peritoneal space. Injection of IL-17D induced significant amounts of Ccl2 in peritoneal wall tissue (i.e., mesothelial cells) within 2 hours (Fig. 1A). Other chemokines such as Cxcl3 and Ccl7 were also induced significantly after i.p. IL-17D injection (Fig. S1A). Injection of recombinant IL-17D also led to recruitment of early innate responders such as neutrophils and monocytes, which express CCR2 (Fig. 1B, Fig. S1B, Fig. S1C). Accumulation of neutrophils peaked at 4 hours, was induced also by IL-17A, and did not occur with heat inactivated IL-17D (Fig. 1B, Fig. 1C, Fig. S1D). Some chemokines that are induced by IL-17D, such as Ccl2 and Ccl7, can also be induced by i.p. IL-17A injection and led to similar recruitment of cells such as monocytes (Fig. S1E, Fig. S1F), confirming that the peritoneal space could respond to IL-17 family cytokines. Notably, the peritoneal wall cells responding to IL-17 family cytokines are likely resident mesothelial cells, since we did not detect significant levels of immune cells within the peritoneal wall by flow cytometry (Fig. S1G).

Figure 1. Recombinant IL-17D induces Ccl2 and recruits innate immune cells into the peritoneum.

Figure 1.

(A) Relative Ccl2 transcript in peritoneal wall tissue (mesothelial cells) hours after i.p. IL-17D injection (n=4). (B) Total peritoneal exudate neutrophils (n=4) recovered hours after i.p. IL-17D injection. (C) Neutrophils recovered in peritoneal exudate after 4h i.p. IL-17D versus IL-17A (n=3). Data are combined from 2 experiments.

Il17d−/− mice display slightly compromised responses to bacterial infection

Having established that non-immune cells in the peritoneum could respond to IL-17D, we next assessed the requirement for IL-17D in anti-bacterial responses where the bacteria are introduced into the peritoneum (i.p.). After i.p. infection with group A Streptococcus (GAS), we monitored WT and Il17d−/− mice for survival and weight loss. We observed slightly higher weight loss in Il17d−/− mice infected by GAS (Fig. 2A, Fig. 2B). We also observed a lower survival rate of Il17d−/− mice at the maximum GAS dose tested (5×107), but this did not achieve statistical significance (Fig. 2C).

Figure 2. GAS-infected Il17d−/− mice have slight weight loss and a decreased survival rate compared to WT mice.

Figure 2.

(A) Percent weight loss of WT and Il17d−/− mice (n=3) after 5×106, 1×107, and 2×107 i.p. GAS doses. (B) Percent weight loss and (C) percent survival of WT (n>6) versus Il17d−/− (n>8) mice after 5×107 dose of GAS i.p. Data are combined from at least 2 independent experiments. The p value in (B) corresponds to the Day5 timepoint.

Previously we had observed that Il17d−/− mice manifest higher viral burden in some organs after murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) infection (17). Therefore, we examined bacterial burden in multiple tissues after GAS infection. Indeed, the kidney and peritoneal cavity harbored significantly higher GAS colony forming units (CFU) in Il17d−/− mice (Fig. 3A, Fig. 3B, Fig. S2A). The higher bacterial burdens in the kidneys of Il17d−/− animals was confirmed through three different challenge doses of GAS (Fig. 3C). The difference in bacterial burden was largest at 24 h and not at later times (Fig. S2B). We did not detect significant differences in bacterial burden between WT and Il17d−/− mice in organs such as the heart, lung, and spleen (Fig. S2C).

Figure 3. IP injection of GAS into Il17d−/− mice results in increased bacterial burden in kidney.

Figure 3.

Bacterial CFU burden in (A) kidney homogenates and (B) peritoneal cavity at 24 hours after GAS infection (dose=10×106) in WT and Il17d−/− mice (n>5). (C) CFU recovered in kidney (n=3) after 24 hours of three doses (6×106, 8×106, 10×106) of GAS i.p. (D) Relative ex vivo Il17d transcript in the GAS-infected kidney of WT mice compared to PBS control injection group (n=4). (E) Relative Ccl2 transcript of WT and Il17d−/− kidney from GAS-infected mice (n=3–5). (F) Percentage of CD45+ cells and absolute (G) neutrophil and (H) macrophage numbers in the kidney from uninfected (n=2–4) and 24 hours post-infected (n=4–6) WT and Il17d−/− mice. Data are combined data of at least 2 independent experiments.

Phenotype of kidney after i.p. infection of Il17d−/− mice

Our results above suggest the kidney may be an organ site that depends on IL-17D for local immunity. Indeed, Il17d but not Il17a transcript was induced in the kidney of WT mice infected with GAS at 4 h and 24 h after i.p. injection (Fig. 3D, S2D). This induction led to higher Ccl2 transcript and CCL2 protein in WT compared to Il17d−/− mice (Fig. 3E, Fig. S2E), suggesting that IL-17D production in the kidney had functional consequences on chemokine production. We found Il17d−/− mice to have slightly decreased overall immune cell in the infected kidney, which coincided with lower Ccl2 protein. Specifically, there was a trend for decreased CD45+ cells and neutrophils but not macrophages (Fig. 3F, 3G, 3H) in the kidneys of IL-17D-deficient mice compared to WTs infected with GAS. However, antibody neutralization of CCL2 in WT mice did not lead to higher bacterial burden we saw in Il17d−/− kidney and peritoneum (Fig. S2F, S2G). Furthermore, blocking of CCL2 alone did not compromise immune cell recruitment into the kidney (Fig. S2H, S2I). Since IL-17D can induce chemokines such as Cxcl3, Cxcl2, and Ccl7 in vivo (Fig. S1A), we surveyed for transcripts of other downstream effectors that could potentially substitute for CCL2 in WT vs Il17d−/− kidneys (Fig. S2D). Although we found some differences, no single chemokine emerged as clearly responsible for recruiting immune cells in the kidney. In the peritoneum, we found no difference in the absolute numbers of recruited neutrophils and macrophages between WT and Il17d−/− mice (Fig. S2J, Fig. S2K), although we found Ccl2 transcript was significantly greater in recruited WT peritoneal cells compared to those in Il17d−/− mice (Fig. S2L).

Viable, but not non-viable GAS induces IL-17D in non-immune cells

Since the response to GAS differed between locations that had relatively high (peritoneum) versus low (kidney) cellularity in immune cells, we explored the induction of Il17d in immune versus non-immune tissues. We performed a short-term ex vivo infection of peritoneal exudate cells (PEC) and compared to in vitro infection of epithelial cell lines from mouse and human origin. At an MOI of 1:1, GAS challenge was sufficient to elicit increases in Il17d transcript in a renal epithelial cell line (HEK293) and PECs (Fig. 4A, Fig. 4B). Induction of Il17d in non-immune cells was ablated when the bacteria were heat-killed (Fig. 4A). In contrast, both alive and heat-killed GAS stimulated similar increases in Il17d transcript in PECs (immune cells), which are mostly macrophages and B cells (Fig. 4B). Since live bacteria could replicate, we next asked whether the selective induction of IL-17D by live bacteria was a result of increased burden. We found that throughout the time-course of the 3-hour assay, there was an approximately 6-fold increase in live bacteria (Fig. S3A). Therefore, we titrated the amount of alive or dead bacteria to test whether selective induction of Il17d by live versus dead bacteria was due to differences in quantity of bacteria. We found that decreasing the amount of live bacteria 16-fold could still induce Il17d better than killed bacteria in epithelial and sarcoma cells (Fig. 4C, S3B), but not in PECs (Fig. 4D). In addition, spiking the assay with additional dead GAS did not increase Il17d transcriptional responses in renal epithelial cells, although it was sufficient for commensurate increases in the inflammatory cytokine Tnf as a control (Fig. 4E). Similar to dead GAS bacteria, the bacterial cell wall component peptidoglycan did not induce Il17d, whereas Tnf transcript rose after peptidoglycan treatment or with living or heat-killed GAS (Fig. 4F).

Figure 4. Viable GAS induces IL-17D in non-immune cells.

Figure 4.

(A) Relative Il17d transcript in HEK293 cells and (B) peritoneal exudate cells (PECs) after 2-hour in vitro incubation with the indicated MOI (multiplicity of infection) using living (alive) or heat-killed (dead) GAS (n=3). (C) Relative Il17d transcript in the HEK293 and (D) PECs after 3-hour incubation with decreasing GAS infection ratio (max MOI of dead and alive is 1:1) (n=3). (E) Relative Il17d and Tnf in HEK293 cells incubated with increasing ratio of heat-killed GAS (n=3). (F) HEK293 cells were incubated with peptidoglycan (PGN), dead GAS (8:1), and living GAS (1:1) and transcript levels of Il17d and Tnf were measured (n=3). Data are representative data of at least 3 independent experiments.

IL-17D induction by viable bacterial requires production of ROS in non-immune cells

We previously found that oxidative stress, via the transcription factor Nrf2, could induce IL-17D (16). As viable GAS stimulates oxidative stress through ROS production (37, 36, 42), we next tested whether treating the infected cells with an ROS scavenger attenuated the levels of IL-17D induced. We confirmed that IL-17D is induced in epithelial cells infected by live GAS, while two different ROS scavengers, N-Acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) and ammonium pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC), independently abrogated the effect (Fig. 5A). Notably, Il17d induction in immune cells (PECs) were not affected by ROS scavengers, regardless of whether GAS was alive or dead (Fig. S3C). At this early time point, ROS scavengers in the culture medium did not block host cell death induced by GAS cytolytic toxins nor have an inhibitory effect on GAS growth during the experiment (Fig. S3D, Fig. S3E).

Figure 5. ROS scavenger suppresses induction of IL-17D in active GAS infection.

Figure 5.

(A) Relative Il17d transcript in the HEK293 cells (n=3) pre-treated with ROS scavengers (NAC and PDTC) prior to incubating with GAS (1:1 alive; 4:1 dead). (B) Kidney and (C) peritoneal cavity bacterial CFU burden after 16h from GAS-infected and ROS scavenger-treated mice (n>4). (D) Relative kidney Il17d and Ccl2 transcript in infected mice pre-treated with ROS scavenger (n=3). (E) Absolute numbers of kidney neutrophils in GAS-infected mice with or without ROS scavenger (n>3). Data are combined data of at least 2 independent experiments.

In order to test whether ROS scavenger compromises immune responses to bacterial infection, NAC was injected preceding GAS inoculation. We found significantly higher bacterial burden in the kidney but not in the peritoneum in WT mice (Fig. 5B, Fig. 5C). Furthermore, Il17d and Ccl2 transcripts and neutrophil infiltration in the NAC-treated mice were lower compared to control-infected mice (Fig. 5D, Fig. 5E).

Discussion

To apply swift action to fight off pathogens, immune cells recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) through pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) leading to effector activities such as production of cytokines (4346). Most PRRs can respond to dead organisms and even specific molecular components of pathogens. Our data suggest an immune trigger that relies on bacterial viability in addition to PAMPs. Indeed, increasing evidence point to demonstrable distinction between PAMPs produced by the living versus the dead (4751). By recognizing molecular by-products produced by viable replicating pathogens, the immune response can discriminate between harmless patterns among the normal microbiota and harmful infection (52, 53). Although we have shown that oxidative stress due to viable infection can elicit one specific cytokine (IL-17D), we envision that a more generalizable paradigm could emerge in which other stress pathways, such as metabolic and proteotoxic stress, could also induce cytokine secretion (54) after infection by viable, but not non-viable organisms. Thus, certain immune responses initiate only after the overall “stress” of infection surpasses a threshold. In this way, rather than passively recognizing a pattern or antigen that the pathogen contains, the host cell must undergo “stress” in order to appropriately respond. Indeed, this paradigm was shown to control the expression of NKG2D ligands, which can be induced by genotoxic stress (5557).

The PRRs that orchestrate the immune response to GAS are not clearly defined (5860). Although TLR2 recognizes peptidoglycans found in Gram-positive bacteria (including GAS), it is not required for immune responses to GAS (58). TLR13 in macrophages is required to recognize GAS bacterial RNA in mice (61), and TLR9 recognition of GAS DNA is key to host defense against the pathogen (62). Activation may depend on other components as well, since C-type lectin receptor expressed by macrophages mediates cytokine production by detecting GAS lipoteichoic acid (63).

GAS is known to induce ROS, and oxidative stress caused by invasion-triggered caspases, and ROS production is linked with cell death in macrophages and epithelial cells following GAS infection (37, 36, 42). Attenuated ROS production has been observed in epithelial cells infected by adhesion-incompetent or heat-killed GAS (36, 37, 64). We have previously reported that oxidative stress can lead to IL-17D expression via the activation of the antioxidant transcription factor, Nrf2 (16, 17). Altogether our studies suggest that viable GAS infection induces ROS, leading to oxidative stress and Nrf2 induction, which results in secretion of IL-17D and innate immune responses.

Given that Nrf2 responds to oxidative stress and is critical in protecting cells against ROS-mediated damage, the role of Nrf2 in bacterial immunity is complex (65). For example, in a sepsis model, Nrf2 deficiency results in far higher mortality rate, sensitivity to inflammation by LPS and TNF, and induction of pro-inflammatory genes (66). In addition to the global changes to the immunoreactivity of Nrf2−/− mice, Nrf2-deficient alveolar macrophages are compromised in phagocytic uptake of microbes such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa (67). On the other hand, Gomez and colleagues report that mice lacking Nrf2 had increased phagocytic activity at baseline but had compromised immune activation and increased mortality after lung infection by Streptococcus pneumoniae (68). It is not clear whether this increased mortality is due to insufficient cell-protective anti-oxidant responses or the lack of IL-17D induction. Although clearly Nrf2 is important for immunity, further studies are needed to clarify the impact of IL-17D in Nrf2-mediated responses.

We demonstrated that Il17d−/− mice are more prone to increased death and weight loss upon opportunistic GAS infection, although with a modest presentation. In addition, the loss of IL-17D resulted in phenotypes limited to some organs such as the kidney, but not in organs such as the spleen and lung. Cytokines in the IL-17 family induces effector molecules that are generally overlapping in similar targets (4, 5, 3). So far, it is known that IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-17E, and IL-17C share at least one receptor subunit, IL-17RA, for signal transduction (2). We speculate that IL-17D is dispensable in spleen and lung because IL-17A is sufficient to confer protection in those organs. In fact, lacking IL-17A in the lung and spleen has been shown to delay and limit neutrophil recruitment after infection by pathogens (69, 70). Furthermore, although IL-17RA and IL-17RC (receptors for IL-17A/F) are protective in candidiasis, IL-17RE (IL-17C cognate receptor) does not confer protection (71). These observations suggest that some IL-17 cytokines are redundant in tissues with overlapping expression patterns.

Similar to IL-17D, IL-17A promotes neutrophil migration and is generally known to participate in anti-pathogen immunity. However, IL-17A/F and IL-17C promote LPS-induced toxic shock, while IL-17D does not (7274). Therefore, in addition to overlapping functions of IL-17 cytokines, the degree of inflammation promoted by each may differ by scale. In light of these previous findings, we speculate that the modest effect of IL-17D is attributable in part to the complex overlaps in downstream effectors amongst pro-inflammatory cytokines and especially those within the IL-17 family.

We measured increases in Il17d and Ccl2 upon in vivo GAS infection of the WT kidney and also detected a trend for lower neutrophil infiltration and relatively lower Ccl2 transcript and protein in the kidneys of Il17d−/− compared to WT mice. Since blocking Ccl2 protein did not compromise infiltration or bacterial clearance we surmise that IL-17D can induce other chemokines that work together to recruit the appropriate immune response, perhaps redundantly. Indeed, recombinant IL-17D induced a plethora of chemokines including Cxcl3, Ccl7 and Ccl5. We speculate that the fact that the kidney harbors a relatively low ratio of immune cells to non-immune cells when compared to organs such as lungs and spleen explains its reliance on IL-17D-induced chemokines for anti-pathogen immunity. Thus, Il17d−/− mice may face greatest disadvantage in warding off bacterial infection in organs dependent on effective recruitment of early active responders. Notably, unregulated IL-17D production in locations that have low levels of resident immune cell could lead to pathology. Therefore, it is logical to place a checkpoint in non-immune cells limiting their production of IL-17D only during live infection, as we have shown. This live/dead checkpoint could serve as a paradigm to regulate immune responses in tissues with low levels of immunity but that may also harbor commensal organisms.

Supplementary Material

1

Key point summary.

  1. GAS infection in Il17d−/− mice leads to greater bacterial burden in kidneys.

  2. Viable, but not heat-killed, GAS induces Il17d in non-immune cells.

  3. A scavenger of reactive oxygen species inhibits Il17d induction in non-immune cells.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Hartwell Foundation (J.D.B.) and by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (1R21AI149023) (J.D.B.).

Reference

  • 1.Kolls JK, and Linden A. 2004. Interleukin-17 family members and inflammation. Immunity 21: 467–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McGeachy MJ, Cua DJ, and Gaffen SL. 2019. The IL-17 Family of Cytokines in Health and Disease. Immunity 50: 892–906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Starnes T, Broxmeyer HE, Robertson MJ, and Hromas R. 2002. Cutting edge: IL-17D, a novel member of the IL-17 family, stimulates cytokine production and inhibits hemopoiesis. J Immunol 169: 642–646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ramirez-Carrozzi V, Sambandam A, Luis E, Lin Z, Jeet S, Lesch J, Hackney J, Kim J, Zhou M, Lai J, Modrusan Z, Sai T, Lee W, Xu M, Caplazi P, Diehl L, de Voss J, Balazs M, Gonzalez L Jr., Singh H, Ouyang W, and Pappu R. 2011. IL-17C regulates the innate immune function of epithelial cells in an autocrine manner. Nat Immunol 12: 1159–1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yamaguchi Y, Fujio K, Shoda H, Okamoto A, Tsuno NH, Takahashi K, and Yamamoto K. 2007. IL-17B and IL-17C are associated with TNF-alpha production and contribute to the exacerbation of inflammatory arthritis. J Immunol 179: 7128–7136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Johnston A, Fritz Y, Dawes SM, Diaconu D, Al-Attar PM, Guzman AM, Chen CS, Fu W, Gudjonsson JE, McCormick TS, and Ward NL. 2013. Keratinocyte overexpression of IL-17C promotes psoriasiform skin inflammation. J Immunol 190: 2252–2262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Aujla SJ, Chan YR, Zheng M, Fei M, Askew DJ, Pociask DA, Reinhart TA, McAllister F, Edeal J, Gaus K, Husain S, Kreindler JL, Dubin PJ, Pilewski JM, Myerburg MM, Mason CA, Iwakura Y, and Kolls JK. 2008. IL-22 mediates mucosal host defense against Gram-negative bacterial pneumonia. Nat Med 14: 275–281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hamada S, Umemura M, Shiono T, Tanaka K, Yahagi A, Begum MD, Oshiro K, Okamoto Y, Watanabe H, Kawakami K, Roark C, Born WK, O’Brien R, Ikuta K, Ishikawa H, Nakae S, Iwakura Y, Ohta T, and Matsuzaki G. 2008. IL-17A produced by gammadelta T cells plays a critical role in innate immunity against listeria monocytogenes infection in the liver. J Immunol 181: 3456–3463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shibata K, Yamada H, Hara H, Kishihara K, and Yoshikai Y. 2007. Resident Vdelta1+ gammadelta T cells control early infiltration of neutrophils after Escherichia coli infection via IL-17 production. J Immunol 178: 4466–4472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Song X, Zhu S, Shi P, Liu Y, Shi Y, Levin SD, and Qian Y. 2011. IL-17RE is the functional receptor for IL-17C and mediates mucosal immunity to infection with intestinal pathogens. Nat Immunol 12: 1151–1158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ishigame H, Kakuta S, Nagai T, Kadoki M, Nambu A, Komiyama Y, Fujikado N, Tanahashi Y, Akitsu A, Kotaki H, Sudo K, Nakae S, Sasakawa C, and Iwakura Y. 2009. Differential roles of interleukin-17A and −17F in host defense against mucoepithelial bacterial infection and allergic responses. Immunity 30: 108–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fallon PG, Ballantyne SJ, Mangan NE, Barlow JL, Dasvarma A, Hewett DR, McIlgorm A, Jolin HE, and McKenzie AN. 2006. Identification of an interleukin (IL)-25-dependent cell population that provides IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 at the onset of helminth expulsion. J Exp Med 203: 1105–1116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Reynolds JM, Lee YH, Shi Y, Wang X, Angkasekwinai P, Nallaparaju KC, Flaherty S, Chang SH, Watarai H, and Dong C. 2015. Interleukin-17B Antagonizes Interleukin-25-Mediated Mucosal Inflammation. Immunity 42: 692–703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.O’Sullivan T, Saddawi-Konefka R, Gross E, Tran M, Mayfield SP, Ikeda H, and Bui JD. 2014. Interleukin-17D mediates tumor rejection through recruitment of natural killer cells. Cell Rep 7: 989–998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Saddawi-Konefka R, O’Sullivan T, Gross ET, Washington A Jr., and Bui JD. 2014. Tumor-expressed IL-17D recruits NK cells to reject tumors. Oncoimmunology 3: e954853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Saddawi-Konefka R, Seelige R, Gross ET, Levy E, Searles SC, Washington A Jr., Santosa EK, Liu B, O’Sullivan TE, Harismendy O, and Bui JD. 2016. Nrf2 Induces IL-17D to Mediate Tumor and Virus Surveillance. Cell Rep 16: 2348–2358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Seelige R, Saddawi-Konefka R, Adams NM, Picarda G, Sun JC, Benedict CA, and Bui JD. 2018. Interleukin-17D and Nrf2 mediate initial innate immune cell recruitment and restrict MCMV infection. Sci Rep 8: 13670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Seelige R, Washington A Jr., and Bui JD. 2017. The ancient cytokine IL-17D is regulated by Nrf2 and mediates tumor and virus surveillance. Cytokine 91: 10–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kono T, Korenaga H, and Sakai M. 2011. Genomics of fish IL-17 ligand and receptors: a review. Fish Shellfish Immunol 31: 635–643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kumari J, Larsen AN, Bogwald J, and Dalmo RA. 2009. Interleukin-17D in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): molecular characterization, 3D modelling and promoter analysis. Fish Shellfish Immunol 27: 647–659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tsutsui S, Nakamura O, and Watanabe T. 2007. Lamprey (Lethenteron japonicum) IL-17 upregulated by LPS-stimulation in the skin cells. Immunogenetics 59: 873–882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Roberts S, Gueguen Y, de Lorgeril J, and Goetz F. 2008. Rapid accumulation of an interleukin 17 homolog transcript in Crassostrea gigas hemocytes following bacterial exposure. Dev Comp Immunol 32: 1099–1104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang QL, Zhu QH, Liang MZ, Wang F, Guo J, Deng XY, Chen JY, Wang YJ, and Lin LB. 2018. Comparative transcriptomic analysis provides insights into antibacterial mechanisms of Branchiostoma belcheri under Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol 76: 196–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rouvier E, Luciani MF, Mattei MG, Denizot F, and Golstein P. 1993. CTLA-8, cloned from an activated T cell, bearing AU-rich messenger RNA instability sequences, and homologous to a herpesvirus saimiri gene. J Immunol 150: 5445–5456. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ivanov II, McKenzie BS, Zhou L, Tadokoro CE, Lepelley A, Lafaille JJ, Cua DJ, and Littman DR. 2006. The orphan nuclear receptor RORgammat directs the differentiation program of proinflammatory IL-17+ T helper cells. Cell 126: 1121–1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yang XO, Pappu BP, Nurieva R, Akimzhanov A, Kang HS, Chung Y, Ma L, Shah B, Panopoulos AD, Schluns KS, Watowich SS, Tian Q, Jetten AM, and Dong C. 2008. T helper 17 lineage differentiation is programmed by orphan nuclear receptors ROR alpha and ROR gamma. Immunity 28: 29–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pfeifer P, Voss M, Wonnenberg B, Hellberg J, Seiler F, Lepper PM, Bischoff M, Langer F, Schafers HJ, Menger MD, Bals R, and Beisswenger C. 2013. IL-17C is a mediator of respiratory epithelial innate immune response. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 48: 415–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.von Moltke J, Ji M, Liang HE, and Locksley RM. 2016. Tuft-cell-derived IL-25 regulates an intestinal ILC2-epithelial response circuit. Nature 529: 221–225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nadjsombati MS, McGinty JW, Lyons-Cohen MR, Jaffe JB, DiPeso L, Schneider C, Miller CN, Pollack JL, Nagana Gowda GA, Fontana MF, Erle DJ, Anderson MS, Locksley RM, Raftery D, and von Moltke J. 2018. Detection of Succinate by Intestinal Tuft Cells Triggers a Type 2 Innate Immune Circuit. Immunity 49: 33–41 e37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Walker MJ, Barnett TC, McArthur JD, Cole JN, Gillen CM, Henningham A, Sriprakash KS, Sanderson-Smith ML, and Nizet V. 2014. Disease manifestations and pathogenic mechanisms of Group A Streptococcus. Clin Microbiol Rev 27: 264–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Carapetis JR, Beaton A, Cunningham MW, Guilherme L, Karthikeyan G, Mayosi BM, Sable C, Steer A, Wilson N, Wyber R, and Zuhlke L. 2016. Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2: 15084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Stevens DL, and Bryant AE. 2016. Severe Group A Streptococcal Infections In Streptococcus pyogenes : Basic Biology to Clinical Manifestations. Ferretti JJ, Stevens DL, and Fischetti VA, eds, Oklahoma City (OK). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rohde M, and Cleary PP. 2016. Adhesion and invasion of Streptococcus pyogenes into host cells and clinical relevance of intracellular streptococci In Streptococcus pyogenes : Basic Biology to Clinical Manifestations. Ferretti JJ, Stevens DL, and Fischetti VA, eds, Oklahoma City (OK). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Valderrama JA, and Nizet V. 2018. Group A Streptococcus encounters with host macrophages. Future Microbiol 13: 119–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Valderrama JA, Riestra AM, Gao NJ, LaRock CN, Gupta N, Ali SR, Hoffman HM, Ghosh P, and Nizet V. 2017. Group A streptococcal M protein activates the NLRP3 inflammasome. Nat Microbiol 2: 1425–1434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Aikawa C, Nozawa T, Maruyama F, Tsumoto K, Hamada S, and Nakagawa I. 2010. Reactive oxygen species induced by Streptococcus pyogenes invasion trigger apoptotic cell death in infected epithelial cells. Cell Microbiol 12: 814–830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Regnier E, Grange PA, Ollagnier G, Crickx E, Elie L, Chouzenoux S, Weill B, Plainvert C, Poyart C, Batteux F, and Dupin N. 2016. Superoxide anions produced by Streptococcus pyogenes group A-stimulated keratinocytes are responsible for cellular necrosis and bacterial growth inhibition. Innate Immun 22: 113–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tsatsaronis JA, Walker MJ, and Sanderson-Smith ML. 2014. Host responses to group a streptococcus: cell death and inflammation. PLoS Pathog 10: e1004266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tsai PJ, Lin YS, Kuo CF, Lei HY, and Wu JJ. 1999. Group A Streptococcus induces apoptosis in human epithelial cells. Infect Immun 67: 4334–4339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chatellier S, Ihendyane N, Kansal RG, Khambaty F, Basma H, Norrby-Teglund A, Low DE, McGeer A, and Kotb M. 2000. Genetic relatedness and superantigen expression in group A streptococcus serotype M1 isolates from patients with severe and nonsevere invasive diseases. Infect Immun 68: 3523–3534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Aziz RK, and Kotb M. 2008. Rise and persistence of global M1T1 clone of Streptococcus pyogenes. Emerg Infect Dis 14: 1511–1517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fieber C, and Kovarik P. 2014. Responses of innate immune cells to group A Streptococcus. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4: 140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tang D, Kang R, Coyne CB, Zeh HJ, and Lotze MT. 2012. PAMPs and DAMPs: signal 0s that spur autophagy and immunity. Immunol Rev 249: 158–175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Akira S, and Hemmi H. 2003. Recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns by TLR family. Immunol Lett 85: 85–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hemmi H, Takeuchi O, Kawai T, Kaisho T, Sato S, Sanjo H, Matsumoto M, Hoshino K, Wagner H, Takeda K, and Akira S. 2000. A Toll-like receptor recognizes bacterial DNA. Nature 408: 740–745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Medzhitov R, and Janeway CA Jr. 2002. Decoding the patterns of self and nonself by the innate immune system. Science 296: 298–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Vance RE, Isberg RR, and Portnoy DA. 2009. Patterns of pathogenesis: discrimination of pathogenic and nonpathogenic microbes by the innate immune system. Cell Host Microbe 6: 10–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sander LE, Davis MJ, Boekschoten MV, Amsen D, Dascher CC, Ryffel B, Swanson JA, Muller M, and Blander JM. 2011. Detection of prokaryotic mRNA signifies microbial viability and promotes immunity. Nature 474: 385–389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Moretti J, Roy S, Bozec D, Martinez J, Chapman JR, Ueberheide B, Lamming DW, Chen ZJ, Horng T, Yeretssian G, Green DR, and Blander JM. 2017. STING Senses Microbial Viability to Orchestrate Stress-Mediated Autophagy of the Endoplasmic Reticulum. Cell 171: 809–823 e813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jensen K, Gallagher IJ, Kaliszewska A, Zhang C, Abejide O, Gallagher MP, Werling D, and Glass EJ. 2016. Live and inactivated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium stimulate similar but distinct transcriptome profiles in bovine macrophages and dendritic cells. Vet Res 47: 46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cruciani M, Sandini S, Etna MP, Giacomini E, Camilli R, Severa M, Rizzo F, Bagnoli F, Hiscott J, and Coccia EM. 2019. Differential Responses of Human Dendritic Cells to Live or Inactivated Staphylococcus aureus: Impact on Cytokine Production and T Helper Expansion. Front Immunol 10: 2622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ugolini M, and Sander LE. 2019. Dead or alive: how the immune system detects microbial viability. Curr Opin Immunol 56: 60–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Blander JM, and Sander LE. 2012. Beyond pattern recognition: five immune checkpoints for scaling the microbial threat. Nat Rev Immunol 12: 215–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Seelige R, Searles S, and Bui JD. 2018. Innate sensing of cancer’s non-immunologic hallmarks. Curr Opin Immunol 50: 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Spear P, Wu MR, Sentman ML, and Sentman CL. 2013. NKG2D ligands as therapeutic targets. Cancer Immun 13: 8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bauer S, Groh V, Wu J, Steinle A, Phillips JH, Lanier LL, and Spies T. 1999. Activation of NK cells and T cells by NKG2D, a receptor for stress-inducible MICA. Science 285: 727–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gasser S, Orsulic S, Brown EJ, and Raulet DH. 2005. The DNA damage pathway regulates innate immune system ligands of the NKG2D receptor. Nature 436: 1186–1190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gratz N, Siller M, Schaljo B, Pirzada ZA, Gattermeier I, Vojtek I, Kirschning CJ, Wagner H, Akira S, Charpentier E, and Kovarik P. 2008. Group A streptococcus activates type I interferon production and MyD88-dependent signaling without involvement of TLR2, TLR4, and TLR9. J Biol Chem 283: 19879–19887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Harder J, Franchi L, Munoz-Planillo R, Park JH, Reimer T, and Nunez G. 2009. Activation of the Nlrp3 inflammasome by Streptococcus pyogenes requires streptolysin O and NF-kappa B activation but proceeds independently of TLR signaling and P2X7 receptor. J Immunol 183: 5823–5829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Loof TG, Goldmann O, and Medina E. 2008. Immune recognition of Streptococcus pyogenes by dendritic cells. Infect Immun 76: 2785–2792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fieber C, Janos M, Koestler T, Gratz N, Li XD, Castiglia V, Aberle M, Sauert M, Wegner M, Alexopoulou L, Kirschning CJ, Chen ZJ, von Haeseler A, and Kovarik P. 2015. Innate immune response to Streptococcus pyogenes depends on the combined activation of TLR13 and TLR2. PLoS One 10: e0119727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zinkernagel AS, Hruz P, Uchiyama S, von Kockritz-Blickwede M, Schuepbach RA, Hayashi T, Carson DA, and Nizet V. 2012. Importance of Toll-like receptor 9 in host defense against M1T1 group A Streptococcus infections. J Innate Immun 4: 213–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Imai T, Matsumura T, Mayer-Lambertz S, Wells CA, Ishikawa E, Butcher SK, Barnett TC, Walker MJ, Imamura A, Ishida H, Ikebe T, Miyamoto T, Ato M, Ohga S, Lepenies B, van Sorge NM, and Yamasaki S. 2018. Lipoteichoic acid anchor triggers Mincle to drive protective immunity against invasive group A Streptococcus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115: E10662–E10671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Boncompain G, Schneider B, Delevoye C, Kellermann O, Dautry-Varsat A, and Subtil A. 2010. Production of reactive oxygen species is turned on and rapidly shut down in epithelial cells infected with Chlamydia trachomatis. Infect Immun 78: 80–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Battino M, Giampieri F, Pistollato F, Sureda A, de Oliveira MR, Pittala V, Fallarino F, Nabavi SF, Atanasov AG, and Nabavi SM. 2018. Nrf2 as regulator of innate immunity: A molecular Swiss army knife! Biotechnol Adv 36: 358–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Thimmulappa RK, Lee H, Rangasamy T, Reddy SP, Yamamoto M, Kensler TW, and Biswal S. 2006. Nrf2 is a critical regulator of the innate immune response and survival during experimental sepsis. J Clin Invest 116: 984–995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Harvey CJ, Thimmulappa RK, Sethi S, Kong X, Yarmus L, Brown RH, Feller-Kopman D, Wise R, and Biswal S. 2011. Targeting Nrf2 signaling improves bacterial clearance by alveolar macrophages in patients with COPD and in a mouse model. Sci Transl Med 3: 78ra32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gomez JC, Dang H, Martin JR, and Doerschuk CM. 2016. Nrf2 Modulates Host Defense during Streptococcus pneumoniae Pneumonia in Mice. J Immunol 197: 2864–2879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ye P, Rodriguez FH, Kanaly S, Stocking KL, Schurr J, Schwarzenberger P, Oliver P, Huang W, Zhang P, Zhang J, Shellito JE, Bagby GJ, Nelson S, Charrier K, Peschon JJ, and Kolls JK. 2001. Requirement of interleukin 17 receptor signaling for lung CXC chemokine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor expression, neutrophil recruitment, and host defense. J Exp Med 194: 519–527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tosello Boari J, Amezcua Vesely MC, Bermejo DA, Ramello MC, Montes CL, Cejas H, Gruppi A, and Acosta Rodriguez EV. 2012. IL-17RA signaling reduces inflammation and mortality during Trypanosoma cruzi infection by recruiting suppressive IL-10-producing neutrophils. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Conti HR, Whibley N, Coleman BM, Garg AV, Jaycox JR, and Gaffen SL. 2015. Signaling through IL-17C/IL-17RE is dispensable for immunity to systemic, oral and cutaneous candidiasis. PLoS One 10: e0122807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Yamaguchi S, Nambu A, Numata T, Yoshizaki T, Narushima S, Shimura E, Hiraishi Y, Arae K, Morita H, Matsumoto K, Hisatome I, Sudo K, and Nakae S. 2018. The roles of IL-17C in T cell-dependent and -independent inflammatory diseases. Sci Rep 8: 15750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Haque A, Ishii Y, Akasaka Y, Matsumoto T, and Tateda K. 2017. Administration of colistin sulfate in endotoxic model at slow and sustained fashion may reverse shock without causing nephrotoxicity in its optimal concentration. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 11: 40–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Lee Y, Clinton J, Yao C, and Chang SH. 2019. Interleukin-17D Promotes Pathogenicity During Infection by Suppressing CD8 T Cell Activity. Front Immunol 10: 1172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES