Abstract
Phaeocystis pouchetii (Hariot) Lagerheim, 1893 regularly dominates phytoplankton blooms in higher latitudes spanning from the English Channel to the Arctic. Through zooplankton grazing and microbial activity, it is considered to be a key resource for the entire marine food web, but the actual relevance of biomass transfer to higher trophic levels is still under discussion. Cell physiology and algal nutritional state are suggested to be major factors controlling the observed variability in zooplankton grazing. However, no data have so far yielded insights into the metabolic state of Phaeocystis populations that would allow testing this hypothesis. Therefore, endometabolic markers of different growth phases were determined in laboratory batch cultures using comparative metabolomics and quantified in different phytoplankton blooms in the field. Metabolites, produced during exponential, early and late stationary growth of P. pouchetii, were profiled using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Then, metabolites were characterized that correlate with the growth phases using multivariate statistical analysis. Free amino acids characterized the exponential growth, whereas the early stationary phase was correlated with sugar alcohols, mono- and disaccharides. In the late stationary phase, free fatty acids, sterols and terpenes increased. These marker metabolites were then traced in Phaeocystis blooms during a cruise in the Barents Sea and North Norwegian fjords. About 50 endometabolites of P. pouchetii were detected in natural phytoplankton communities. Mannitol, scyllo-inositol, 24-methylcholesta-5,22-dien-3β-ol, and several free fatty acids were characteristic for Phaeocystis-dominated blooms but showed variability between them. Distinct metabolic profiles were detected in the nutrient-depleted community in the inner Porsangerfjord (< 0.5 µM NO3−, < 0.1 µM PO3−4), with high relative amounts of free mono- and disaccharides indicative for a limited culture. This study thereby shows how the variable physiology of phytoplankton can alter the metabolic landscape of entire plankton communities.
Subject terms: Microbial communities, Microbial ecology, Chemical ecology, Metabolomics
Introduction
The marine microalga Phaeocystis pouchetii (Hariot) Lagerheim, 1893 is a key phytoplankton species in the Arctic and high latitude areas, especially along the Norwegian coast and in the Barents Sea1. Several single-celled stages are known or hypothesized within its life cycle, however, most spring blooms are characterized by the colony stage of the alga2–4. Colonies develop from dividing single cells excreting a polysaccharide-rich mucus that builds the matrix for associations of several hundreds of cells5. These carbohydrate-rich particles contribute to the microbial loop and vertical flux6,7, as well as the marine pelagic food web. The palatability and intake of Phaeocystis by grazers, its nutritional value, and chemical defence strategies have been investigated intensively for decades8. P. pouchetii colonies are ingested by various grazers including dinoflagellates, ciliates, copepods, amphipods, and fish. Other grazers avoid colonies or select specific colony size ranges. Size selection mechanisms, as well as algal bloom phase-dependent biochemical mediation, have been suggested9,10. Recent modelling of the Arctic marine ecosystem under climate warming predicted a decrease in sea ice coverage and an increase in gross primary production11. P. pouchetii may expand its distribution and occurrence as already observed locally12,13. Within this context, the relevance of P. pouchetii biomass for the trophic transfer in the Arctic food web needs further investigation.
The role of P. pouchetii within the Arctic food web has been investigated under laboratory, semi-natural, and natural conditions with contradicting results8. Whereas in some experiments both single cells and colonies are ingested by zooplankton grazers14, in others only colonies were grazed15, or the copepod grazers avoided healthy colonies ingesting only senescent ones9. Senescent colonies of P. pouchetii blooms around Spitsbergen and the Barents Sea were actively grazed by mesozooplankton, however, not by microzooplankton16,17. Whereas microzooplankton actively grazed upon single cells of P. pouchetii during blooms in mesocosm experiments, the colonies were not efficiently ingested neither by micro- nor mesozooplankton18,19. In contrast, high microzooplankton grazing on single cells and small colonies of P. pouchetii may have even inhibited bloom-formation in a North Norwegian fjord20. In conclusion, zooplankton grazing may rely both on Phaeocystis colony formation and bloom phase with a possible underlying modulating effect of the metabolite composition of the cells.
Indeed, phytoplankton cells do not represent steady-state chemical compartments. Cell metabolism is highly plastic responding to both biotic and abiotic environmental conditions. As shown for laboratory batch cultures of the diatoms Skeletonema marinoi and Thalassiosira pseudonana, the haptophyte Emiliania huxleyi, and the cyanobacterium Synechococcus, the composition and release of metabolites from phytoplankton cells is growth phase-dependent21–25. The responsiveness of herbivores to algal metabolite composition can substantially influence grazing rates, and thereby shape predator–prey interactions22. Algal fatty acid profiles can further alter the chemical composition of predator cues that mediate diverse grazing defence strategies in their algal prey26. Metabolic variability in algal endo- and exometabolomes is also expected in natural phytoplankton communities, but was never demonstrated, and could be a determining factor for the grazing on P. pouchetii.
In metametabolomics approaches, complex natural communities are investigated in contrast to defined monoclonal laboratory cultures. Untargeted metabolite profiling of marine phytoplankton communities has been applied to search for novel metabolites27,28, characterize marine particulate organic matter29,30, support metabarcoding studies31, and screen for sulphur compounds32. However, whereas algal endometabolomes are frequently investigated under laboratory conditions, data on phytoplankton bloom metabolomes is scarce. This study aims to define intracellular marker metabolites for growth phases of Phaeocystis pouchetii laboratory cultures using comparative metabolomics33. With these marker metabolites, natural phytoplankton communities were analysed and their bloom physiology characterized in a metametabolomics approach. Parts of this study are taken from the PhD Thesis by C. Kuhlisch34.
Results
Growth of Phaeocystis pouchetii AJ01 in batch culture
The metabolic plasticity of P. pouchetii was investigated by comparing endometabolomes at different growth phases. A strain with just one morphotype was selected to prevent potential overlaying effects of morphotype heterogeneity. Batch cultures were set up, monitored every 2–3 days throughout 47 days, and sampled three times for endometabolite profiling. All cultures showed logistic growth (Fig. 1a). Light microscopy confirmed one flagellated single cell type during the whole growth period. This is in accordance with the reported synchronized cell divisions taking place during the dark phase35. Directly after inoculation, the cultures remained in lag-phase for 4 days showing no significant changes in cell abundance or Chl a fluorescence (Fig. 1a). In parallel, photosystem II (PSII) efficiency increased, indicating the recovery of the cells after transfer to fresh medium (Fig. 1b, left panel). During the following 12 days, cell numbers increased significantly between days (t-test, α = 0.05) with an average specific growth rate of µ = 0.38 ± 0.04 day−1, whereas PSII efficiency remained at 0.31–0.35 ± 0.02. Metabolites were sampled on day 12. During the following 20 days, cell abundances levelled off at about 2 × 106 cells mL−1 indicating the stationary growth phase. Chl a fluorescence slightly increased further, whereas PSII efficiency first decreased to 0.1 ± 0.04 on day 29 (= early stationary growth, sampled on day 26), and then remained low until day 46. During the last two days, Chl a fluorescence decreased significantly (t-test, α = 0.05) and PSII efficiency dropped to 0.04 ± 0.01, while no significant changes in cell abundance occurred (= late stationary growth, sampled on day 47).
Nutrient concentrations can explain this growth development (Supplementary Fig. S1). During lag and exponential growth, neither nitrate nor phosphate was limiting, nitrite was below the detection limit. Nitrate decreased from about 800 µM to 600 µM at the end of the experiment, thus cultures were not N-limited. Nitrite increased from day 22 onwards to 4.5 µM, which may indicate light limitation, as low irradiance levels can restrict cellular nitrite reduction leading to nitrite excretion36. This may have induced the stationary growth phase. Phosphate fell below 1 µM on day 36 and may have co-limited algal growth during the last two weeks of the experiment.
Algal cultures showed an initial background of 2 × 106 bacteria mL−1, increasing exponentially during algal exponential growth, and levelling off around 5 × 107 bacteria mL−1 (Fig. 1b, right panel). Bacterial metabolites may contribute to the sampled metabolite profiles, however, with an average carbon content of 20 fg carbon per cell for bacteria37 and 107 pg carbon per cell for P. pouchetii38, bacteria accounted for less than 0.1% of the cellular carbon content at the end of the experiment. Co-occurring bacteria can further affect algal growth and metabolism39–41. However, as also the absence of bacteria affects algal growth and some microalgae cannot be cultured under axenic conditions42,43, the P. pouchetii cultures were not made axenic before experimental setup.
Growth phase-specific endometabolites of P. pouchetii cultures
Metabolic pathways are undergoing substantial quantitative and qualitative changes during growth. In batch cultures, physiological adaptations occur simultaneously with the developing growth environment. Overall, 518 features were detected by AMDIS and integrated by MET-IDEA. After data pre-processing, 477 features remained for data analysis: 458 ± 6 from exponential growth, 431 ± 27 from early, and 398 ± 57 from late stationary growth (n = 4). Multivariate statistical analysis of the sum normalized peak areas allowed to differentiate the three growth phases. Initially, an unsupervised principal coordinate analysis (PCO) was conducted, with the first two axes explaining 78% sample variation. Using the PCO axes, a supervised canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) was conducted (Fig. 2a). The replicates of each growth phase grouped together, whereas the growth phases were separated by two axes (eigenvalues: axis 1 = 0.948, axis 2 = 0.836; squared canonical correlations: axis 1 = 0.898, axis 2 = 0.698). Separation of the growth phases was confirmed by cross validation (1 out of 12 samples misclassified) and permutation test (n = 9999, p < 0.001 for trace statistic). Based on a critical value of 0.708 (test of multiple correlation using t; n = 12), 225 metabolites were significantly correlated with the CAP axes (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Table S6) from which 107 were highly correlated (> 0.8). After removal of features with a retention time < 5 min and artefacts (doublets, signal-to-noise ratio < 10, contaminants), 88 features remained for identification. From those, 31% were identified (n = 27, in the following mentioned by their name), 3% putatively annotated (n = 3, in the following mentioned as putative), 41% putatively assigned to metabolite classes (n = 36, in the following discussed as classes), and 25% remained unknown (n = 22). Most metabolites belonged to the class of saccharides, sugar alcohols, and sugar acids (n = 31), followed by fatty acids and derivatives (n = 11), and amino acids (n = 9). Many metabolites had their highest relative concentration in either the exponential phase (n = 32; e.g. amino acids) or the late stationary phase (n = 33; e.g. sterols), whereas only 12 metabolites were correlated with the early stationary phase (e.g. glycerol and scyllo-inositol; Fig. 2c).
Saccharides, sugar acids and sugar alcohols were the most pronounced regulated substance classes showing strong interphase variability. Most saccharides were significantly correlated with the late stationary phase with either constantly increasing relative concentrations (e.g. xylose, ribose, maltose), or strong up-regulation in both stationary phases (e.g. glyceraldehyde). On the contrary, most sugar acids (e.g. threonic acid) were significantly correlated with the exponential phase with decreasing relative concentrations towards the late stationary phase. Most of the sugar alcohols (e.g. glycerol, scyllo-inositol) were correlated with the early stationary phase, whereas one unidentified sugar alcohol (met. 275) was up-regulated in the late stationary phase. In this phase, mannitol showed strong down-regulation, as did two pentafuranoses (met. 186, 194) and one sugar acid (putatively identified as quinic acid, Supplementary Fig. S2). Fatty acids and derivatives—the second most pronounced regulated substance class—were primarily correlated with late stationary growth (e.g. arachidonic acid (AA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), 1-palmitoyl-glycerol), or both the early and late stationary phase (putative octadecadienoic- and octadecatrienoic acid). The only exceptions were tetra- and hexadecanoic acid, which showed higher relative concentrations in the exponential (tetra-) and early stationary phase (hexa-). Amino acids (e.g. glycine, alanine, serine, valine, threonine) were correlated with the exponential phase and decreased towards the late stationary phase. Representatives of other metabolite classes were either correlated with the exponential phase (e.g. pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid), or with the late stationary phase (e.g. α-tocopherol, an unidentified alcohol (met. 155), three hydrocarbons (putative dodecatriene, met. 389, met. 433), and two sterols (24-methylcholesta-5,22-dien-3β-ol, met. 452)).
Blooms of Phaeocystis pouchetii in natural phytoplankton communities
Several phytoplankton communities were sampled along a transect in the Barents Sea (Stations 1–3) and along the North Norwegian coast (Stations 4–6) capturing different bloom scenarios (Fig. 3, Supplementary Figs. S3, S4). Station 1 was located at the ice edge in Arctic waters; slight stratification and non-limiting nutrients allowed a biomass-rich diatom bloom dominated by Gyrosigma tenuirostrum, Thalassiosira spp., and Odontella aurita. Station 2 was located in the polar front region, where a well-mixed water column allowed a diatom bloom with low biomass (Thalassiosira spp., O. aurita, Fragilariopsis oceanica). Station 3 was located within North Atlantic waters characterized by an elevated temperature and salinity, a well-stratified water column, and high nutrient concentrations. The phytoplankton community was dominated in biomass by diatoms (Thalassiosira spp., Skeletonema costatum, Chaetoceros spp.), with a high abundance of P. pouchetii colonies (2.7 × 103 cells/mL at Chl a max.). Within the colonies, individual cells were distributed in well-organized patches, and a few colonies showed infestation by the pennate diatom Pseudo-nitzschia spp. sensu (Fig. S4a) indicating an early stage of the Phaeocystis bloom. Station 4 was located in the inner Porsangerfjord and was characterized by limiting nutrient concentrations (Chl a max.: nitrate below detection level, 0.05 µM phosphate, 0.22 µM silicate). The algal bloom was dominated in biomass by diatoms (Thalassiosira spp., Thalassiosira nordenskioldii, Chaetoceros socialis), with a high abundance of P. pouchetii colonies (1.8 × 104 cells/mL at Chl a max.). The cell patches within colonies were slightly denser compared to Station 3, and Pseudo-nitzschia spp. was present in only a few occasions (Fig. S4b). Station 5a and 5b were both located in the outer Porsangerfjord with a shallow mixed upper water layer and Chl a maximum (0–20 m), and with low nutrient concentrations (< 0.7 µM nitrate, < 0.12 µM phosphate). The phytoplankton bloom was dominated by P. pouchetii with a high abundance of colonies (up to 75% biomass and 3.3 × 104 cells/mL). Colony infestation with Pseudo-nitzschia spp. was a prominent feature at both Station 5a and 5b, whereas at Station 5b there was also evidence of Phaeocystis cells leaving the organized patch structure, forming flagellated cells that were spread more-or-less evenly in the colony matrix (Fig. S4c-d). Station 6 was located in the outer Ullsfjord characterized by a deep phytoplankton bloom (Chl a max.: about 40 m). The phytoplankton community comprised ciliates, flagellates and P. pouchetii (40% biomass contribution at 50 m). In contrast to previous stations, the abundance of Phaeocystis colonies increased with depth (6.4 × 103 cells/mL at 50 m), and cell sizes varied between 2–6 µm with a high proportion of large cells (6 µm: up to 47%). Furthermore, progressed colony breakdown was apparent by cells that had left the organized patch structure and were evenly spread in the colonies (Fig. S4e).
In summary, P. pouchetii characterized the phytoplankton communities at Stations 3–6 with high colony abundances and clear signs of bloom stage progression along the station transect. These stations are therefore well suited to test, if growth phase-specific endometabolites as determined from P. pouchetii laboratory cultures can be detected in the field and used to characterize the physiology of natural Phaeocystis blooms.
Metabolic landscape of natural plankton communities
In total, 572 features were extracted from all laboratory and field samples. After removal of features that occurred in low abundance, not in triplicates, not within the range of the retention time standards, or belonged to internal standards, 182 features remained. Manual curation revealed that 30% of the remaining features were detected in at least one control sample (Fig. 4a), and were omitted from further discussion. Thus, 47 features were unique for Phaeocystis cultures, 30 features were unique for field samples, and 46 features were shared between laboratory and field samples (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Table S8). Most of the shared features (~ 70%) showed growth phase-dependence in cultures. Hierarchical cluster analysis of normalized peak areas averaged per station (Supplementary Fig. S5) revealed three main occurrence patterns in the field: high abundance at diatom-dominated stations, at P. pouchetii-dominated stations, or at the nutrient-depleted station 4 (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Table S8). Within the metabolites abundant at P. pouchetii-dominated stations were the sugar alcohols mannitol and scyllo-inositol (Fig. 4b), the fatty acids octadecatetraenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid, 1-stearoyl-glycerol, and the sterol 24-methylcholesta-5,22-dien-3β-ol. The fatty acids hexadecanoic acid, octadecanoic acid, octadecenoic acid, and several unknown metabolites formed a subclade with higher abundance at station 3 and lower at station 6. The nutrient-depleted station 4 was characterized by high abundances of mono- and disaccharides (ribose, maltose, several unknown saccharides), fatty acids and derived metabolites (hexadecenoic acid, 1-myristoyl-glycerol (Fig. 4b), 1-palmitoyl-glycerol), and phytol. Within the metabolites abundant at diatom-dominated stations were threonic acid, several saccharides (e.g. erythrose and met. 292 (Fig. 4b)), fatty acids such as EPA, and three phytol-like structures. Thus, several of the laboratory-derived endometabolites were re-detected in natural phytoplankton blooms. While some were indeed associated with Phaeocystis biomass, some showed stronger association with other taxa like diatoms (Supplementary Table S4). Within the Phaeocystis blooms, several Phaeocystis endometabolites varied strongly independent of biomass, thereby indicating additional environmental constraints such as nutrient availability (Supplementary Table S5).
Discussion
Growth phase-specific endometabolites of P. pouchetii
It has long been supposed that the metabolic plasticity of phytoplankton may influence zooplankton grazing and transfer rates, especially for the haptophyte Phaeocystis8. Until recently, however, thorough metabolite analyses of the prey have not been included in grazing studies. When included, it has indeed been shown that phytoplankton species, such as the diatom Skeletonema marinoi, can change during growth from an avoided to a highly ingested food source in accordance with changes in their endometabolome22. Endometabolic plasticity during growth has been demonstrated for rather few microalgae, namely S. marinoi and E. huxleyii23,24. This study on P. pouchetii is the first report of endometabolic plasticity for this dominant Arctic and Boreal haptophyte. Physiological changes in batch cultures of P. pouchetii were characterized using untargeted metabolomics. Growth phases as determined by cell abundance and Chl a fluorescence were associated with distinct endometabolic states with pronounced alternations in amino acid, fatty acid, and carbohydrate metabolism.
Exponential growth was characterized by free amino acids reflecting high metabolic activity towards proteins under nitrogen-replete conditions. Increased levels in free amino acids during intense growth were previously reported for diatoms and higher plants44. The observed elevated levels in glutamate may be directly linked to nitrogen incorporation, whereas serine and glycine are photorespiration products, threonine is derived from the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, and valine from glycolytic pyruvate44. The dominance of these amino acids in the exponential growth phase thus indicates carbon and nitrogen acquisition, and can be used as a marker for actively growing Phaeocystis cells. The composition in free amino acids differed from other marine microalgae23,24, indicating taxon specificity in nitrogen assimilation and amino acid metabolism. Pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid, which is involved in pyrrole biosynthesis45, may be linked to amino acid metabolism. Even though this carboxylic acid is repeatedly found in microalgae23,42, its role in algal metabolism is unknown. Threonic acid, an oxidation product of ascorbic acid46, was also present at higher levels during exponential growth. As ascorbic acid is a well-known antioxidant in chloroplasts that scavenges reactive oxygen species, threonic acid may indicate elevated oxidative stress during high photosynthetic activity.
Characteristic for the exponential and even more the early stationary growth of P. pouchetii were mannitol and a quinic acid derivative. Mannitol is not produced by diatoms47, and represents a metabolic marker with certain taxon-specificity within phytoplankton blooms. Mannitol is the main short-term carbon storage molecule in E. huxleyi48, and may thus also play a role in carbon assimilation of P. pouchetii. It would indicate ongoing photosynthesis during growth limitation. The quinic acid derivative showed high mass spectral similarity to a quinic acid standard, however, retention indices were not alike (Supplementary Fig. S2). As quinic acid is related to the shikimate pathway fuelling the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids and secondary metabolites, further characterization is recommended.
In the early stationary growth, mono- and disaccharides, sugar alcohols (pentitols), glycerol, and scyllo-inositol increased, reflecting an active carbohydrate metabolism. Pentitols may thereby indicate active interconversion of monosaccharide building blocks49, whereas glycerol can be linked to lipid metabolism50. The abundance of scyllo-inositol is interesting, as most commonly, myo-inositol is reported for algae, which was only present in small amounts and not regulated (data not shown). All eight inositol isomers are metabolized from myo-inositol and involved in e.g. phosphor storage51. The rare stereoisomer scyllo-inositol was reported for the haptophyte Pavlova, however, with unknown function52. Induced lipid metabolism during early and late stationary growth is further reflected by elevated levels of glyceraldehyde and methylated C18-polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). Glyceraldehyde can be derived from hexoses fuelling the TCA cycle and, via interconversion to glycerol, also the lipid metabolism. C18-PUFAs are synthesized from C18:0 via C18:1ω953. Phaeocystis is known to contain high amounts of C18:0 and C18-PUFAs (especially C18:1ω9 and C18:5ω3) in the polar lipid fraction54, however, the occurrence and role of free fatty acids is poorly understood. The methylation of free fatty acid may be a storage artefact55. The observed increase in metabolites associated with lipid metabolism with the onset of stationary growth is in accordance with earlier studies on light, nutrient, and osmotic stress56.
In the late stationary growth, mono- and disaccharides, free fatty acids, sterols, tocopherols, and terpenes became abundant. These metabolites provide evidence for an active metabolism of carbohydrates, lipids and derived structures. Within the life cycle of Phaeocystis, monosaccharides play a role as precursors and intermediates in regular cell metabolism, whereas disaccharides are involved in the synthesis of polysaccharides for carbon storage, cell wall and mucus formation6. The observed intracellular accumulation of carbohydrates may reflect both the uncoupling of Calvin and TCA cycle during stationary phase, as well as an active metabolism of glucan, the main storage polysaccharide. Both, the dominant sterol of P. pouchetii 24-methylcholesta-5,22-dien-3β-ol57, and the membrane antioxidant α-tocopherol were most abundant in the late stationary phase. These metabolites are important for membrane stability towards declining growth23,24. The polyamine putrescine, which is a metabolic marker for the declining growth in diatoms and dinoflagellates58,59, was neither detected in P. pouchetii nor in E. huxleyi or other haptophytes23,60. This demonstrates that different strategies in metabolic stress response occur within algal lineages during growth decline.
Thus, the growth physiology of P. pouchetii is reflected in the levels of endometabolites, such as amino acids, fatty acids, and carbohydrates. Besides metabolite responses that are more general, such as for α-tocopherol, also responses with some taxon-specificity are observed, such as for mannitol.
Physiological marker metabolites in natural plankton assemblages
Metabolite profiles of phytoplankton blooms reflect not only algal taxonomy, but also abiotic environmental factors and biotic interactions. Traditional chemotaxonomy approaches have recently been questioned, since the metabolic variability induced in response to environmental stressors might be more substantial than differences between species22,61. This study documents substantial physiological plasticity both in laboratory and in field experiments. Previous work linked fatty acids to trophic relationships and senescence62,63. Very few studies provide a direct link of metabolic variability in the field with algal performance, as demonstrated for the resistance to viral infection in E. huxleyi64. Our data allows surveying metabolic markers of growth phase-dependent physiology in the field using an unbiased metabolomics approach, and paves the way for a better understanding of phenotypic variability in plankton.
At all cruise stations, Phaeocystis was found and, in accordance, many of the endometabolites identified in laboratory cultures were detected in all investigated natural phytoplankton communities with variable concentrations. A diverse metabolic landscape shaped by the abundance of various plankton taxa in different growth phases as modulated by both biotic and abiotic factors was recognized (Fig. 5). Light attenuates with water depth, which has a strong impact on the photosynthetic activity of all algal cells as reflected by a hexose that decreased with greater depth (met. 281; Fig. 5b). The availability of nutrients such as NO3− and PO43− strongly influences algal physiology and metabolism. Accordingly, distinct endometabolite profiles were observed in the nutrient-depleted inner Porsangerfjord (Station 4) with elevated levels of several mono- and disaccharides (Fig. 5c), as well as lipids and derived metabolites. This distinct pattern is likely a result of nutrient limitation and the resulting stress metabolism, as observed during the late growth phase in laboratory cultures. In addition, decline of a preceding diatom bloom as indicated by high bacterial production (0.31 µg C L−1 h−1) and abundance of heterotrophic flagellates (e.g. Gyrodinium lachryma) may have contributed to these metabolic profiles.
Several of the P. pouchetii endometabolites were most abundant at the stations dominated in biomass by Phaeocystis (Fig. 5e). Their differential distribution within these Phaeocystis blooms reflects different bloom physiologies. This is demonstrated e.g. by mannitol, which is not produced by diatoms47 and had an interesting distribution: it was lower at stations with high Phaeocystis biomass (> 50%, Station 5a/b) and higher at stations with low Phaeocystis biomass. In accordance with elevated mannitol levels during exponential and early stationary growth in the P. pouchetii cultures, this may indicate an early bloom phase with high carbon acquisition at Station 3. Stations 4–5 would correspond to later bloom phases of P. pouchetii. The high mannitol level at Station 6 at largest depth may be attributed to an elevated metabolic activity due to morphological changes: colony abundance increased with depth, cell sizes ranged from 2–6 µm with a high proportion of 6 µm cells (ca. 50%) and a relative increase of smaller cells with depth (Fig. 3). This indicates a late bloom stage at which aggregation and sinking of senescent Phaeocystis colonies induces the release of flagellated single cells2. Station 3 was also characterized by several free fatty acids reflecting active lipid metabolism, whereas Stations 5–6 showed high levels of the sterol 24-methylcholesta-5,22-dien-3β-ol. This sterol is a marker for late stationary growth in Phaeocystis laboratory cultures, and was relative to Phaeocystis biomass highest at the senescent Station 6 revealing again the presence of different bloom physiologies. A few metabolites were correlated either with the biomass of diatoms (e.g. EPA; Fig. 5d) or Phaeocystis (e.g. C18:1; Fig. 5e), and therefore rather reflect bloom taxonomy than physiology.
Laboratory-derived physiological marker metabolites thus supported the notion of different bloom stages as suggested by microscopy and FlowCam analysis. Their applicability seems to be robust despite the fact that in natural environments these laboratory-derived metabolites underlie additional constraints, such as complex microbial interactions or simply the effect of field sampling protocols with longer sample handling times.
Conclusion
Taken together, the diverse metabolic landscape of natural plankton blooms was revealed and linked to the growth physiology of P. pouchetii using endometabolite markers of laboratory cultures. The physiological response of phytoplankton cells to irradiance, nutrient availability, and growth phase is reflected in their (meta)metabolite profiles both in laboratory cultures and field communities. Characterizing the physiological state of Phaeocystis blooms in addition to classical methods, such as microscopy or the targeted analysis of selected metabolites such as dimethylsulfoniopropionate, can give direct information on food quality, and may help to explain variability in zooplankton grazing. As cell physiology directly affects the metabolite composition of the algal phycosphere, it may also influence other species interactions including pathogens such as bacteria, viruses and fungi. Following cell lysis, the endometabolome is released to the dissolved organic matter pool, which may shape the marine microbial loop as well as the heterotrophic plankton community.
Material and methods
Solvents
Methanol, water, and pyridine (stored over 4 Å molecular sieve under argon) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Chloroform (stabilized with ethanol) and tetrahydrofuran (for LC–MS, without stabilizer) as purchased from VWR were stored under argon. Ethanol in LC grade and hexane in GC grade were purchased from Merck. All other solvents had HPLC grade.
Algal cultivation
Phaeocystis pouchetii AJ01 (isolated 1994 from Raunefjord, Norway) was obtained from Aud Larsen (Bergen University, Norway). The strain consists solely of diploid, flagellated cells, and showed no colony formation in culture since isolation35. Cultures were grown in sterile-filtered, autoclaved f/2 medium (-Si) based on natural seawater at 6.7 ± 0.9 °C, under a 14:10 h light:dark cycle, at 15–50 µmol photons s−1 m−2 provided by fluorescent tubes (Osram L15W/840 Lumilux Cool White). Cultures were shaken once daily. To adapt cells to experimental conditions, the stock culture was transferred in three subsequent passages within the exponential growth phase into fresh medium (10% ν:ν). In 2 L glass bottles, 1.62 L medium (n = 4) was inoculated with 180 mL adapted culture to reach an average initial cell abundance of 4.6 ± 3.3 × 103 cells mL−1. An additional bottle with 1.8 L medium was used as medium control.
Sampling of metadata
Every 2–3 days, 13 mL of culture was sampled to determine chlorophyll a (Chl a) fluorescence, photosystem II (PSII) efficiency, algal abundance, bacterial abundance and inorganic nutrient concentrations as previously described23. Briefly, Chl a fluorescence and PSII efficiency were determined with a plate reader in black well plates. F0 (initial fluorescence) was measured after incubation at 5 °C in the dark, and 30 s double orbital shaking. To determine algal abundance, samples were fixed with acidic Lugol's solution (1% final concentration), and stored at dark until investigation by light microscopy. At least 400 cells or at most 16 mm2 were counted in duplicates in a Fuchs-Rosenthal counting chamber at × 400 magnification. Growth rates were calculated by iterative fitting of the logistic growth model (; N = population size, t = growth time, K = max. population size) to the observed abundances by minimizing their deviance using the SOLVER function in Excel. To determine bacterial abundance, aliquots of 1 mL were fixed with glutaraldehyde (0.5% final concentration), frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at − 80 °C until flow cytometry analysis. Thawed samples were diluted 1:50 with TE buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) and stained with SybrGold (Invitrogen, USA). Then, 100 µL stained sample was mixed with 300 µL TE buffer and 100 µL Fluoresbrite Plain YG 1.0 µm Microspheres (Polysciences, Germany), and immediately measured at 525 nm using a Cytomics FC 500 flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Germany) with a 20 mW 488 nm air-cooled argon-ion laser. Reference beads were calibrated with CountBright absolute counting beads (7 µm, Life technologies, USA) at 575 nm for 1 min with 10 µL min−1. To determine inorganic nutrient concentrations, aliquots of 10 mL were filtered (0.22 µm), fixed with chloroform (0.05% final concentration), and stored at − 20 °C until further analysis24. Concentrations of phosphate (PO43−) and nitrite (NO2−) were determined colorimetrically65,66, whereas nitrate (NO3−) was analyzed using ion chromatography67.
Sampling, extraction and derivatization of endometabolites
For endometabolite analysis, aliquots of 0.5 L were collected 2 h after onset of light from all cultures and the medium control following 12 days ('exp'), 26 days ('e.stat') and 47 days ('l.stat') of culturing. Cells were filtered through GF/C filters (47 mm diameter, Whatman) at 65 kPa under pressure with filtration times of ca. 20 min. Wet filters were immediately transferred to 25 mL glass beakers. A single filter was required to pass the entire culture volume from exponential cultures ('exp'), whereas two or three filters were required to pass the culture volume from early ('e.stat') and late ('l.stat') stationary cultures, respectively. After filtration, cells were immediately re-suspended in 1 mL extraction mix (methanol:ethanol:chloroform, 1:3:1, v: v: v) and, if multiple filters were used, combined in 4 mL glass vials. The time between filtration start and metabolite quenching in extraction mix was on average 20 min. As internal standard (IS), 5 µL ('l.stat': 10 µL) aqueous ribitol (4 mM; > 99%, Sigma-Aldrich) was added. Samples were kept at − 20 °C until analysis 1 month after the end of the experiment. For endometabolite profiling, samples (0.5 mL per filter) were transferred into 1.5 mL centrifuge tubes (Eppendorf, Germany), sonicated for 10 min, centrifuged for 15 min (30.000 g, 4 °C), and supernatants were transferred to 1.5 mL glass vials. Samples were evaporated to dryness under vacuum before subsequent derivatization with methoxyamine and MSTFA24. In case the IS peak was missing, samples were re-derivatized with 10 µL MSTFA and incubated for 30 min at 60 °C followed by 30 min at 40 °C.
Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis
Samples were run on a Trace GC Ultra coupled to a ISQ LT and AS3000 II auto sampler (ThermoScientific) that was equipped with a DB-5 ms column (Agilent J&W, 30 m, 0.25 mm internal diameter, 0.25 µm film thickness, 10 m Duraguard pre-column) as previously described24. A new, deactivated glass liner (ThermoScientific, 5 × 8 × 105 mm inner × outer diameter × length) with glass wool was used for every batch of 21 samples. Samples were injected using split 10. The electron impact source was set to 70 eV at 280 °C. Resolution was 866 at m/z 502.20 (FWHM = 0.53).
Data processing and statistical analysis
To allow background-noise correction using the MassLynx 4.1 CODA tool (Waters, MCQ = 0.8, Smoothing window = 5), all chromatograms were first converted to NetCDF with the Xcalibur File Converter (ThermoScientific) and then to RAW with the MassLynx 4.1 DataBridge (Waters). Signals were de-convoluted with AMDIS 2.71, and peaks were integrated with MET-IDEA 2.08 (instrument type: 'quadrupole)24, using the chromatogram with the highest number of components as model ion file. The resulting peak area table was imported in Microsoft Excel. All peaks were removed that corresponded to the internal standard, retention index (RI)-mixture, and contaminants (signals that were negative in all replicates of one day after subtraction of the corresponding solvent blank). Finally, data was peak sum normalized, and a canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) was performed24. Variables (loadings) were screened for significant correlation with the first two CAP axes using the Pearson correlation test (k = 1, m = 2, α = 0.01). Score and loading plots were visualized in SigmaPlot version 11.0 (https://systatsoftware.com/products/sigmaplot/sigmaplot-how-to-cite-sigmaplot/ Systat Software, San Jose, CA) and heat maps in MetaboAnalyst 3.068.
Metabolite identification
Metabolite features (abbreviated as 'met.' and listed in Supplementary Table S6) were assigned to one of four identification levels69: metabolites, where both retention index and mass spectrum matched a measured chemical reference standard were classified as identified (level 1). Only these metabolites are mentioned and discussed by their name. Others were ranked according to their spectral similarity to a database compound, and annotated and discussed as putative compound (level 2) or compound class (level 3), or as unidentified (level 4). Chemical reference standards were derivatized as described above. Linear retention indices were calculated, and a match between detected metabolite and reference standard was accepted with ΔRI ≤ 2670,71. Mass spectra as extracted by AMDIS were manually compared to the following spectral databases using MS Search 2.0 g (Nist): NIST 11 library version (mainlib, replib, nist_ri), Golm Metabolome Database libraries T_MSRI_ID (https://csbdb.de/csbdb/dload/dl_msri.html; 2004) and GMD_20111121_VAR5_ALK_MSP (https://gmd.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/download/; 2011), and an in-house database (175 compounds from several metabolite classes including algal extracts of Skeletonema marinoi). Mass spectral annotations were regarded as match with a reverse match factor (R.Match) > 900, or tagged with '?' if the factor was 800–900 and '??' if it was 700–800. Metabolite data were deposited at the EMBL-EBI MetaboLights database (MTBLS758).
Sampling of natural plankton communities
Phytoplankton communities were sampled in the Barents Sea and along the North Norwegian coast during the PHAEONIGMA cruise from 02–07 May 2013 on board of R/V Håkon Mosby (Table 1).
Table 1.
# | Station description | Latitude | Longitude | Date | Sample depths |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Arctic water | 75° 48.15 N | 20° 03.63 E | 02/05/2013 | 5 m, 16 m, 31 m |
2 | Polar front | 74° 42.51 N | 19° 59.49 E | 02/05/2013 | 6 m, 15 m, 30 m |
3 | Atlantic water | 72° 45.50 N | 20° 02.78 E | 03/05/2013 | 6 m, 32 m, 58 m |
4 | Inner Porsangerfjord | 70° 20.95 N | 25° 15.57 E | 04/05/2013 | 5 m, 20 m, 40 m |
5a | Outer Porsangerfjord | 70° 51.19 N | 26° 05.36 E | 04/05/2013 | 5 m, 20 m, 41 m |
5b | Outer Porsangerfjord | 70° 51.06 N | 26° 04.70 E | 06/05/2013 | 5 m, 20 m, 40 m |
6 | Ullsfjord | 69° 55.79 N | 19° 53.53 E | 07/05/2013 | 5 m, 33 m, 50 m |
At each station, vertical profiles of temperature, salinity, depth, oxygen, Chl a fluorescence, transmission and irradiance were measured with a CTD (Sea-Bird SBE 9) mounted to a rosette sampler with twelve 10 L Niskin bottles.
Samples for the analysis of dissolved inorganic nutrients and phytoplankton community composition were collected as previously described72. Briefly, nitrate (measured indirectly as nitrite following reduction), phosphate and silicate concentrations were determined colorimetrically using a continuous flow analyzer (Skalar San + Autoanalyzer) according to ISO1702565. For epifluorescence microscopy, a subsample of 50 mL was stained for 3 min with 20 µL primulin (250 µg mL−1 working solution with 0.1 M TRIS HCl at pH 4), fixed with glutaraldehyde (3.6% final concentration) and 70% glycerol (10v% final concentration), filtered onto black filters (Nucleopore, 0.4 µm), mounted on glass slides, and stored at − 20 °C until phytoplankton cell enumeration and carbon estimation73. In total, 234 taxa were identified and classified as either 'P. pouchetii', 'diatom', 'flagellate', 'ciliate' or 'unknown cell'. In these counts, Phaeocystis was recorded as single cells in different size classes. Colonial cell abundance of Phaeocystis was determined for subsamples of 20 mL with a FlowCam IV (Fluid Imaging technologies, ME, USA) equipped with a × 4 objective and a FC300 flow cell (Fluid Imaging technologies)74. Colonial cell number was calculated from individual images of colonies by regression analysis19. To estimate the age of each Phaeocystis bloom, FlowCam images taken at the Chl a maximum were evaluated for size and structure (Supplementary Fig. S4): whereas intact colonies dominate early bloom stages, colonies in aging blooms develop typifying features such as the infestation by diatoms73 and appearance of flagellated cells during senescence2.
Water samples for metabolite analysis were collected above, within, and below the Chl a maximum (Table 1), and transferred to cleaned 10 L PE containers. Endometabolites were sampled in triplicates by filtering in parallel 2–6 L seawater at 60 kPa under pressure per single GF/C filter (47 mm diameter). Larger zooplankton was removed with a pipette. Cells were re-suspended in 1.2 mL extraction mix as described above. Filtration and extraction were performed in a 10 °C cold room. Average filtration time was 8–10 h and average time between sampling and quenching was ~ 12 h. Samples were stored at − 20 °C until transportation on ice to Jena, Germany, and at − 80 °C until GC–MS analysis 1 year later.
GC–MS analysis of natural plankton samples
Samples were thawed, diluted with extraction mix to 1.7 mL, and 5 µL IS were added. Aliquots of 0.7 mL per sample were processed as described above. Derivatization was achieved in a reduced volume of 25 µL methoxymation solution and 25 µL silylation solution. Samples with low IS signal were re-derivatized with MSTFA as described above. GC–MS measurements were conducted using a 6890 N GC equipped with a 7683B auto sampler (Agilent) coupled to a Micromass GCT Premier (Waters) mass spectrometer. The GC was operated with glass liners (Agilent, 4 × 6.3 × 78.5 mm inner × outer diameter × length), split 1, and 250 °C injector temperature. The MS was used with 300 °C source temperature and dynamic range extension mode. Resolution was > 6.000 at m/z 501.97.
Comparative data analysis of laboratory- and field-derived endometabolomes
To qualitatively compare the endometabolites of P. pouchetii strain AJ01 with those of the natural communities, all GC–MS raw files were converted to NetCDF and further processed with MetaboliteDetector 2.075. Using 'RI Calibration Wizard', the peaks of the added IS and RI compounds were manually assigned to calibrate the system and calculate RI values for all deconvoluted features (for parameters see Supplementary Table S1, S2). This was done individually for the laboratory (including medium blanks) and the field data (including derivatization blanks). Using 'Batch quantification', the features of both data sets were quantified within all chromatograms (for parameters see Supplementary Table S3). The resulting file was exported to Microsoft Excel, features with < 3 matches within biological replicates, an average signal-to-noise ratio < 10, multiple extraction, or retention times outside the RI range were removed, and all remaining features manually verified based on RI and mass spectrum. A presence-absence data table for laboratory, field and control samples was generated and plotted as Venn diagram. Features that were shared between laboratory and field data, but which were absent in control samples, were visualized as semi-quantitative box plots using MetaboAnalyst 3.0, and as cruise transect section plots using Ocean Data View 4.7.1076 with DIVA gridding and automatic scale lengths. Spearman rank correlation coefficients, Monte Carlo-estimated p-values, and 95%-CI limits were calculated for selected metabolites and environmental parameters (Supplementary Table S4). In addition, a partial least squares (PLS) regression analysis was conducted using the R ‘pls’ package77 with the function ‘jackknife’ to test the correlation between these metabolites and environmental parameters. The influence of taxonomy, irradiance and nutrient availability was evaluated for all station samples; however, due to missing nutrient concentrations at Station 2 either this station or the three nutrient parameters were omitted. The influence of Phaeocystis physiology was evaluated for the five stations with Phaeocystis blooms omitting the taxonomic parameter ‘Phaeocystis presence’. For the Jackknife approximate t tests, regression models with at least one component were used.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge Aud Larsen (Bergen, Norway) for providing us strain Phaeocystis pouchetii AJ01, Katharina Eick (Jena, Germany) for flow cytometry analysis, JenaBios GmbH (Jena, Germany) for phosphate and nitrate analysis of the laboratory samples, and E. Kuhlisch for statistical support. We further thank the crew of R/V Håkon Mosby for their assistance onboard, A. Larsen and Marc E. Frischer as cruise leaders, and all fellow scientists. This work was supported by Jena School of Microbial Communication (C.K.); VELUX Foundation Grant VKR022608 (H.J.); and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—SFB 1127/2 ChemBioSys – 239748522 and under Germany´s Excellence Strategy – EXC 2051 – Project-ID 390713860. The research cruise in 2013 was funded by the Research Council of Norway research project ‘A novel cross-disciplinary approach to solve an old enigma: the food-web transfer of the mass-blooming phytoplankter Phaeocystis pouchetii’ (Phaeonigma, project no. 204479/F20). Parts of this manuscript including figures are already included in the PhD thesis by C. Kuhlisch.
Author contributions
C.K. and G.P. designed the project. C.K., J.A., A.S. and H.J. performed experiments and analyzed data. C.K. wrote the manuscript with input of J.N. and G.P. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Data availability
The laboratory dataset is available in the EMBL-EBI MetaboLights repository (MTBLS758). The environmental dataset is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-77169-w.
References
- 1.Degerlund M, Eilertsen HC. Main species characteristics of phytoplankton spring blooms in NE Atlantic and Arctic waters (68–80° N) Estuaries Coasts. 2010;33:242–269. doi: 10.1007/s12237-009-9167-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rousseau V, Chretiennot-Dinet MJ, Jacobsen A, Verity P, Whipple S. The life cycle of Phaeocystis: state of knowledge and presumptive role in ecology. Biogeochemistry. 2007;83:29–47. doi: 10.1007/s10533-007-9085-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rat'kova TN, Wassmann P. Seasonal variation and spatial distribution of phyto- and protozooplankton in the central Barents Sea. J. Mar. Syst. 2002;38:47–75. doi: 10.1016/S0924-7963(02)00169-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wassmann P, Ratkova T, Reigstad M. The contribution of single and colonial cells of Phaeocystis pouchetii to spring and summer blooms in the north-eastern North Atlantic. Harmful Algae. 2005;4:823–840. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2004.12.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Verity PG, Zirbel MJ, Nejstgaard JC. Formation of very young colonies by Phaeocystis pouchetii from western Norway. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2007;47:267–274. doi: 10.3354/ame047267. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Alderkamp AC, Buma AGJ, van Rijssel M. The carbohydrates of Phaeocystis and their degradation in the microbial food web. Biogeochemistry. 2007;83:99–118. doi: 10.1007/s10533-007-9078-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Reigstad M, Wassmann P. Does Phaeocystis spp. contribute significantly to vertical export of organic carbon? Biogeochemistry. 2007;83:217–234. doi: 10.1007/s10533-007-9093-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nejstgaard JC, et al. Zooplankton grazing on Phaeocystis: a quantitative review and future challenges. Biogeochemistry. 2007;83:147–172. doi: 10.1007/s10533-007-9098-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Estep KW, Nejstgaard JC, Skjoldal HR, Rey F. Predation by copepods upon natural populations of Phaeocystis pouchetii as a function of the physiological state of the prey. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1990;67:235–249. doi: 10.3354/meps067235. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hansen B, Bjørnsen PK, Hansen PJ. The size ratio between planktonic predators and their prey. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1994;39:395–403. doi: 10.4319/lo.1994.39.2.0395. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Slagstad D, Ellingsen IH, Wassmann P. Evaluating primary and secondary production in an Arctic Ocean void of summer sea ice: an experimental simulation approach. Prog. Oceanogr. 2011;90:117–131. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2011.02.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lasternas S, Agustí S. Phytoplankton community structure during the record Arctic ice-melting of summer 2007. Polar Biol. 2010;33:1709–1717. doi: 10.1007/s00300-010-0877-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nöthig E-M, et al. Summertime plankton ecology in Fram Strait: a compilation of long- and short-term observations. Polar Res. 2015;34:23349. doi: 10.3402/polar.v34.23349. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tande KS, Båmstedt U. On the trophic fate of Phaeocystis pouchetii. I. Copepod feeding rates on solitary cells and colonies of Phaeocystis pouchetii. Sarsia. 1987;72:313–320. doi: 10.1080/00364827.1987.10419728. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huntley M, Tande K, Eilertsen HC. On the trophic fate of Phaeocystis pouchetii (Hariot). II. Grazing rates of Calanus hyperboreus (Krøyer) on diatoms and different size categories of Phaeocystis pouchetii. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1987;110:197–212. doi: 10.1016/0022-0981(87)90001-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Calbet A, Saiz E, Almeda R, Movilla JI, Alcaraz M. Low microzooplankton grazing rates in the Arctic Ocean during a Phaeocystis pouchetii bloom (Summer 2007): fact or artifact of the dilution technique? J. Plankton Res. 2011;33:687–701. doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbq142. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Saiz E, et al. Zooplankton distribution and feeding in the Arctic Ocean during a Phaeocystis pouchetii bloom. Deep Sea Res. 2013;72:17–33. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2012.10.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nejstgaard JC, et al. Plankton development and trophic transfer in seawater enclosures with nutrients and Phaeocystis pouchetii added. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2006;321:99–121. doi: 10.3354/meps321099. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ray JL, et al. Molecular gut content analysis demonstrates that Calanus grazing on Phaeocystis pouchetii and Skeletonema marinoi is sensitive to bloom phase but not prey density. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2016;542:63–77. doi: 10.3354/meps11560. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Archer SD, Verity PG, Stefels J. Impact of microzooplankton on the progression and fate of the spring bloom in fjords of northern Norway. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2000;22:27–42. doi: 10.3354/ame022027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Barofsky A, Vidoudez C, Pohnert G. Metabolic profiling reveals growth stage variability in diatom exudates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2009;7:382–390. doi: 10.4319/lom.2009.7.382. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Barofsky A, et al. Growth phase of the diatom Skeletonema marinoi influences the metabolic profile of the cells and the selective feeding of the copepod Calanus spp. J. Plankton Res. 2010;32:263–272. doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbp121. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mausz MA, Pohnert G. Phenotypic diversity of diploid and haploid Emiliania huxleyi cells and of cells in different growth phases revealed by comparative metabolomics. J. Plant Physiol. 2015;172:137–148. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vidoudez C, Pohnert G. Comparative metabolomics of the diatom Skeletonema marinoi in different growth phases. Metabolomics. 2012;8:654–669. doi: 10.1007/s11306-011-0356-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fiore CL, Longnecker K, Kido Soule MC, Kujawinski EB. Release of ecologically relevant metabolites by the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus CCMP 1631. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;17:3949–3963. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Grebner W, Berglund EC, Berggren F, Eklund J, Harðadóttir S, Andersson MX, Selander E. Induction of defensive traits in marine plankton—new copepodamide structures. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2019;64:820–831. doi: 10.1002/lno.11077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Longnecker K, Futrelle J, Coburn E, Kido Soule MC, Kujawinski EB. Environmental metabolomics: databases and tools for data analysis. Mar. Chem. 2015;177:366–373. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2015.06.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Longnecker K, Kujawinski EB. Mining mass spectrometry data: using new computational tools to find novel organic compounds in complex environmental mixtures. Org. Geochem. 2017;110:92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2017.05.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Llewellyn CA, Sommer U, Dupont CL, Allen AE, Viant MR. Using community metabolomics as a new approach to discriminate marine microbial particulate organic matter in the western English Channel. Prog. Oceanogr. 2015;137:421–433. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2015.04.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Johnson WM, Longnecker K, Kido Soule MC, Arnold WA, Bhatia MP, Hallam SJ, Van Mooy BAS, Kujawinski EB. Metabolite composition of sinking particles differs from surface suspended particles across a latitudinal transect in the South Atlantic. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2020;65:111–127. doi: 10.1002/lno.11255. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ray JL, et al. Metabarcoding and metabolome analyses of copepod grazing reveal feeding preference and linkage to metabolite classes in dynamic microbial plankton communities. Mol. Ecol. 2016;25:5585–5602. doi: 10.1111/mec.13844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Durham BP, Boysen AK, Carlson LT, Groussman RD, Heal KR, Cain KR, Morales RL, Coesel SN, Morris RM, Ingalls AE, Armbrust EV. Sulfonate-based networks between eukaryotic phytoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria in the surface ocean. Nat. Microbiol. 2019;10:1706–1715. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0507-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kuhlisch C, Pohnert G. Metabolomics in chemical ecology. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2015;32:937–955. doi: 10.1039/C5NP00003C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kuhlisch, C. Physiological Plasticity of Marine Phytoplankton Revealed by Untargeted Metabolomics. PhD thesis, Friedrich Schiller University Jena (2018).
- 35.Jacobsen A, Veldhuis MJW. Growth characteristics of flagellated cells of Phaeocystis pouchetii revealed by diel changes in cellular DNA content. Harmful Algae. 2005;4:811–821. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2004.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lomas MW, Lipschultz F. Forming the primary nitrite maximum: nitrifiers or phytoplankton? Limnol. Oceanogr. 2006;51:2453–2467. doi: 10.4319/lo.2006.51.5.2453. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lee S, Fuhrman JA. Relationships between biovolume and biomass of naturally derived marine bacterioplankton. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1987;53:1298–1303. doi: 10.1128/AEM.53.6.1298-1303.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Vogt M, et al. Global marine plankton functional type biomass distributions: Phaeocystis spp. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 2012;4:107–120. doi: 10.5194/essd-4-107-2012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Amin SA, et al. Interaction and signalling between a cosmopolitan phytoplankton and associated bacteria. Nature. 2015;522:98–101. doi: 10.1038/nature14488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Durham BP, et al. Recognition cascade and metabolite transfer in a marine bacteria-phytoplankton model system. Environ. Microbiol. 2017;19:3500–3513. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Paul C, Mausz MA, Pohnert G. A co-culturing/metabolomics approach to investigate chemically mediated interactions of planktonic organisms reveals influence of bacteria on diatom metabolism. Metabolomics. 2013;9:349–359. doi: 10.1007/s11306-012-0453-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Abby SS, Touchon M, De Jode A, Grimsley N, Piganeau G. Bacteria in Ostreococcus tauri cultures—friends, foes or hitchhikers? Front. Microbiol. 2014;5:505. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hirth M, et al. Metabolic profiling identifies trehalose as an abundant and diurnally fluctuating metabolite in the microalga Ostreococcus tauri. Metabolomics. 2017;13:68. doi: 10.1007/s11306-017-1203-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bromke MA. Amino acid biosynthesis pathways in diatoms. Metabolites. 2013;3:294–311. doi: 10.3390/metabo3020294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Walsh CT, Garneau-Tsodikova S, Howard-Jones AR. Biological formation of pyrroles: nature's logic and enzymatic machinery. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006;23:517–531. doi: 10.1039/b605245m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Parsons HT, Yasmin T, Fry SC. Alternative pathways of dehydroascorbic acid degradation in vitro and in plant cell cultures: novel insights into vitamin C catabolism. Biochem. J. 2011;440:375–385. doi: 10.1042/BJ20110939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dittami SM, et al. Mannitol in six autotrophic stramenopiles and Micromonas. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011;6:1237–1239. doi: 10.4161/psb.6.8.16404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Obata T, et al. Gas-chromatography mass-spectrometry (GC-MS) based metabolite profiling reveals mannitol as a major storage carbohydrate in the coccolithophorid alga Emiliania huxleyi. Metabolites. 2013;3:168–184. doi: 10.3390/metabo3010168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Loewus F. Carbohydrate interconversions. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1971;22:337–364. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.22.060171.002005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Xue L-L, Chen H-H, Jiang J-G. Implications of glycerol metabolism for lipid production. Prog. Lipid Res. 2017;68:12–25. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2017.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Loewus FA, Murthy PPN. Myo-Inositol metabolism in plants. Plant Sci. 2000;150:1–19. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00150-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kobayashi Y, Torii A, Kato M, Adachi K. Accumulation of cyclitols functioning as compatible solutes in the haptophyte alga Pavlova sp. Phycol. Res. 2007;55:81–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1835.2007.00451.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mühlroth A, et al. Pathways of lipid metabolism in marine algae, co-expression network, bottlenecks and candidate genes for enhanced production of EPA and DHA in species of Chromista. Mar. Drugs. 2013;11:4662–4697. doi: 10.3390/md11114662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hamm C, Reigstad M, Riser CW, Mühlebach A, Wassmann P. On the trophic fate of Phaeocystis pouchetii. VII. Sterols and fatty acids reveal sedimentation of P pouchetii-derived organic matter via krill fecal strings. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2001;209:55–69. doi: 10.3354/meps209055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sauerschnig C, Doppler M, Bueschl C, Schuhmacher R. Methanol generates numerous artifacts during sample extraction and storage of extracts in metabolomics research. Metabolites. 2018;8:1. doi: 10.3390/metabo8010001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Roessler PG. Environmental control of glyerolipid metabolism in microalgae: commercial implicatioins and future research directions. J. Phycol. 1990;26:393–399. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1990.00393.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Nichols PD, Skerratt JH, Davidson A, Burton H, McMeekin TA. Lipids of cultured Phaeocystis pouchetii - signatures for food-web, biogeochemical and environmental studies in Antarctica and the Southern-Ocean. Phytochemistry. 1991;30:3209–3214. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(91)83177-M. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lu YH, Hwang D-F. Polyamine profile in the paralytic shellfish poison-producing alga Alexandrium minutum. J. Plankton Res. 2002;24:275–279. doi: 10.1093/plankt/24.3.275. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Vidoudez C, Pohnert G. Growth phase-specific release of polyunsaturated aldehydes by the diatom Skeletonema marinoi. J. Plankton Res. 2008;30:1305–1313. doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbn085. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hamana K, Niitsu M. Cellular polyamines of lower eukaryotes belonging to the phyla Glaucophyta, Rhodophyta, Cryptophyta, Haptophyta and Percolozoa. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2006;52:235–240. doi: 10.2323/jgam.52.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.White DA, et al. The combined effects of seasonal community succession and adaptive algal physiology on lipid profiles of coastal phytoplankton in the Western English Channel. Mar. Chem. 2015;177:638–652. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2015.10.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Dalsgaard J, St. John M, Kattner G, Müller-Navarra D, Hagen W. Fatty acid trophic markers in the pelagic marine environment. Adv. Mar. Biol. 2003;46:225–340. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2881(03)46005-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rontani J-F. Visible light-dependent degradation of lipidic phytoplanktonic components during senescence: a review. Phytochemistry. 2001;58:187–202. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(01)00202-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Vardi A, et al. Viral glycosphingolipids induce lytic infection and cell death in marine phytoplankton. Science. 2009;326:861–865. doi: 10.1126/science.1177322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hansen HP, Koroleff F. Determination of nutrients. In: Grasshoff K, Kremling K, Ehrhardt M, editors. Methods of Seawater Analysis. New York: Wiley-VCH; 2007. pp. 159–228. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Parsons T, Maita Y, Lalli C. Determination of Nitrite. Manual of Chemical and Biological Methods for Seawater Analysis. Oxford: Pergamon; 1984. pp. 7–9. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Okada T, Kuwamoto T. Potassium hydroxide eluent for nonsuppressed anion chromatography of cyanide, sulfide, arsenite, and other weak acids. Anal. Chem. 1985;57:829–833. doi: 10.1021/ac00281a013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Xia J, Wishart DS. Using MetaboAnalyst 3.0 for comprehensive metabolomics data analysis. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2016;55:14101–141091. doi: 10.1002/cpbi.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Sumner LW, et al. Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis. Metabolomics. 2007;3:211–221. doi: 10.1007/s11306-007-0082-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.van den Dool H, Kratz PD. A generalization of the retention index system including linear temperature programmed gas-liquid partition chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1963;11:463–471. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)80947-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Koo I, Shi X, Kim S, Zhang X. iMatch2: compound identification using retention index for analysis of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry data. J. Chromatogr. A. 2014;1337:202–210. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.02.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Pree B, et al. A simple adjustment to test reliability of bacterivory rates derived from the dilution method. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2016;14:114–123. doi: 10.1002/lom3.10076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sazhin AF, Artigas LF, Nejstgaard JC, Frischer ME. The colonization of two Phaeocystis species (Prymnesiophyceae) by pennate diatoms and other protists: a significant contribution to colony biomass. Biogeochemistry. 2007;83:137–145. doi: 10.1007/s10533-007-9086-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Jonasdottir SH, et al. Extensive cross-disciplinary analysis of biological and chemical control of Calanus finmarchicus reproduction during an aldehyde forming diatom bloom in mesocosms. Mar. Biol. 2011;158:1943–1963. doi: 10.1007/s00227-011-1705-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Hiller K, et al. MetaboliteDetector: comprehensive analysis tool for targeted and nontargeted GC-MS based metabolome analysis. Anal. Chem. 2009;81:3429–3439. doi: 10.1021/ac802689c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Schlitzer, R. Ocean Data View. https://odv.awi.de (2016).
- 77.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2020). https://www.R-project.org.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The laboratory dataset is available in the EMBL-EBI MetaboLights repository (MTBLS758). The environmental dataset is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.