Skip to main content
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2019 Jul 12;4(2):2424–2425. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1598802

The complete chloroplast genome of Korean Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim. (Rosaceae): providing genetic background of two types of P. ussuriensis

Myong-Suk Cho a,*, Yongsung Kim a,b,c,*, Seung-Chul Kim a,, Jongsun Park b,c,
PMCID: PMC7687443  PMID: 33365570

Abstract

Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim. is one of the most important pear species cultivated in Asia, grown in northern China, far-east Russia, Korea, and Japan. Here we completed the chloroplast genome of wild P. ussuriensis collected in Bonghwa-gun, Korea, which was 159,986 bp in length consisting of four subregions: 87,947 bp of large single copy (LSC) and 19,255 bp of small single copy (SSC) regions are separated by 26,392 bp of inverted repeat (IR) regions. The genome contained a total of 130 genes including 85 protein-coding genes, eight rRNAs, and 37 tRNAs. The overall GC content was 36.5% and those in the LSC, SSC, and IR regions were 34.2%, 30.4%, and 42.6%, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis of 14 Pyrus chloroplast genomes provided the diverse genetic background for wild P. ussuriensis populations in Korea by confirming that wild P. ussuriensis sequenced in this study contained Pyrus pyrifolia type plastome. It revealed substantial sequence variations up to 121 single nucleotide polymorphisms and 781 insertions and deletions against another wild accession of P. ussuriensis (P. ussuriensis type) collected in Mt. Hambaek, Korea.

Keywords: Oriental pear, occidental pear, hypervariable regions, P. ussuriensis type, P. pyrifolia type


Pear (Pyrus; Rosaceae), an important economic crop as the third most significant temperate fruit species after grapes and apples (Moazedi et al. 2014), has been cultivated in more than 50 countries since as early as 2,000 years ago in China (Bell 1990). The genus Pyrus contains 22 widely recognized primary species including at least six naturally occurring and three artificial interspecific hybrids (Bell et al. 1996). The species diversity is concentrated in two regions of Western Europe and Eastern Asia, forming two distinct groups of occidental and oriental pears (Rubtsov 1944).

Despite of high conservatism in Pyrus chloroplast genome (Katayama and Uematsu 2003), two large deletions in accD-psaI and rps16-trnQ defined three types of Pyrus cpDNA: Type A (P. ussuriensis type) has no deletion, type B (P. pyrifolia type) has 228-bp deletion in accD-psaI and type C (P. communis type) contains 141-bp deletion in rps16-trnQ.

Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim. is one of the important species of several Asian pear species cultivated. Wild P. ussuriensis cultivars are endemic to the northern part of China, far-east Russia, Korea, and Japan producing small and globose fruit with persistent calyxes (Bell et al. 1996; Wuyun et al. 2013). To investigate its genetic diversity, we characterized P. ussuriensis chloroplast genome isolated in Bonghwa-gun, Korea (Voucher, InfoBoss Cyber Herbarium (IN); IB-00593; GPI-187; Seoul, Republic of Korea), different from previous chloroplast genome (MK172841; Gil et al. under review).

Total genomic DNA of P. ussuriensis GPI-187 was extracted from fresh leaves using a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Genome sequencing was performed using HiSeq X (Macrogen Inc., Korea) and de novo assembly and sequence confirmation were done by Velvet version 1.2.10 (Zerbino and Birney 2008), SOAP GapCloser version 1.12 (Zhao et al. 2011), BWA version 0.7.17 (Li 2013), and SAMtools version 1.9 (Li et al. 2009). Geneious version R11 11.0.5 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand) was used for chloroplast genome annotation based on P. ussuriensis chloroplast genome (MK172841).

The chloroplast genome of P. ussuriensis GPI-187 (Genbank accession is MK507863) was 159,986 bp long (GC ratio is 36.5%) long and had four subregions: 87,947 bp of large single copy (LSC; 34.3%) and 19,255 bp of small single copy (SSC; 30.4%) regions were separated by 26,392 bp of inverted repeat (IR; 42.6%). It contained 130 genes (85 protein-coding genes, eight rRNAs, and 37 tRNAs) and 20 genes (nine protein-coding gene, four rRNAs, and seven tRNAs) were duplicated in IR regions.

The neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree, which showed the same topology as maximum likelihood tree, was constructed by MEGA X (Kumar et al. 2018) after aligning fifteen whole chloroplast genomes using MAFFT version 7.388 (Katoh and Standley 2013). Pyrus ussuriensis GPI-187 was nested within Type B clade sharing a 228-bp deletion with two accessions of P. ussuriensis cultivars, displaying 121 single nucleotide polymorphisms, and 781 insertions and deletions identified against P. ussuriensis (MK172841) nested in Type A clade (Figure 1). It indicates that wild P. ussuriensis populations in Korea possess high genetic diversity harbouring both type A and B, probably resulted from introgression or chloroplast capture through procedure of species dispersal and/or interspecific crosses in cultivation.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Neighbour-joining tree with bootstrap test (10,000 replicates) of fourteen Pyrus and one Sorbus chloroplast genomes: four Pyrus ussuriensis (MK507863 sequenced in this study, MK172841, KX450883, and KX450882), four Pyrus pyrifolia (NC 015996, KX825882, KX904342, and KX450877), Pryus x bretschneideri (KX450881), Pyrus pashia (NC_034909), Pyrus communis x Pyrus pyrifolia (KX450884), Pyrus hopensis (MF521826), Pyrus communis (KX450879), Pyrus spinosa (NC 023130), and Sorbus torminalis (NC 033975). The numbers above branches indicate bootstrap support values of neighbour-joining and maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees, respectively.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  1. Bell RL. 1990. Pears (Pyrus) In: Moore JN, Ballington JR Jr. editors. Genetic resources of temperate fruit and nut crops. Wageningen, The Netherlands: International Society for Horticultural Science Wageningen; p. 655–697. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell RL, Quamme HA, Layne REC, Skirvin RM. 1996. Pears In: Janick J, Moore JN, editors. Fruit breeding, Vol. I: tree and tropical fruits. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; p. 441–514. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gil H-Y, Kim Y, Kim S-H, Kwon Y, Jeon J0H, Kim S-C, Park J. under review. The complete chloroplast genome of Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim. (Rosaceae). doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1581585 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Katayama H, Uematsu C. 2003. Comparative analysis of chloroplast DNA in Pyrus species: physical map and gene localization . Theor Appl Genet. 106:303–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 30:772–780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 35:1547–1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Li H. 2013. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv Preprint arXiv. 13033997. [Google Scholar]
  8. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R. 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 25:2078–2079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Moazedi R, Nahandi FZ, Mahdavi KM, Ebrahemi M. 2014. Assessment of genetic relationships of some cultivars of Asian pears (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) with some native pears of Northern Iran using SSR markers. Intl J Farm Alli Sci. 3:923–929. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rubtsov G. 1944. Geographical distribution of the genus Pyrus and trends and factors in its evolution. Am Nat. 78:358–366. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wuyun T, Ma T, Uematsu C, Katayama H. 2013. A phylogenetic network of wild Ussurian pears (Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim.) in China revealed by hypervariable regions of chloroplast DNA. Tree Genet Genom. 9:167–177. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genom Res. 18:821–829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhao QY, Wang Y, Kong YM, Luo D, Li X, Hao P. 2011. Optimizing de novo transcriptome assembly from short-read RNA-Seq data: a comparative study. BMC Bioinformatics. 12:S2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES