Skip to main content
BMC Medical Research Methodology logoLink to BMC Medical Research Methodology
. 2020 Nov 25;20:280. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01161-1

Correction to: Optimality criteria for futility stopping boundaries for group sequential designs with a continuous endpoint

Xieran Li 1, Carolin Herrmann 1,2, Geraldine Rauch 1,2,
PMCID: PMC7687821  PMID: 33238882

Correction to: BMC Med Res Methodol 20, 274 (2020)

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01141-5

Following publication of the article [1], it was noted that due to a typesetting error the old version of Fig. 1 is displayed with the correct version of Fig. 1, and it should be deleted.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The “optimal” futility boundary α0,opt as a function of the admissible parameters Powloss and πwrong for N = 140 (blue dots) and n = 188 (red squares). The black symbols highlight the “optimal” futility boundaries for Powloss = 0.05 and πwrong = 0.05

The correct Fig. 1 and caption have been included in this correction, and the original article has been corrected.

Reference

  • 1.Li X, et al. Optimality criteria for futility stopping boundaries for group sequential designs with a continuous endpoint. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20:274. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01141-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Medical Research Methodology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES