In silico studies evidenced the role of structurally diverse plant secondary metabolites in reducing SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis

Hariprasad Puttaswamy; Hittanahallikoppal Gajendramurthy Gowtham; Monu Dinesh Ojha; Ajay Yadav; Gourav Choudhir; Vasantharaja Raguraman; Bhani Kongkham; Koushalya Selvaraju; Shazia Shareef; Priyanka Gehlot; Faiz Ahamed; Leena Chauhan

doi:10.1038/s41598-020-77602-0

. 2020 Nov 25;10:20584. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77602-0

In silico studies evidenced the role of structurally diverse plant secondary metabolites in reducing SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis

Hariprasad Puttaswamy ^1,^✉,^#, Hittanahallikoppal Gajendramurthy Gowtham ^1,^#, Monu Dinesh Ojha ^1,^#, Ajay Yadav ^1,^#, Gourav Choudhir ^1,^#, Vasantharaja Raguraman ^1,^#, Bhani Kongkham ^1,^#, Koushalya Selvaraju ^1,^#, Shazia Shareef ^1,^#, Priyanka Gehlot ^1,^#, Faiz Ahamed ^1,^#, Leena Chauhan ^1,^#

PMCID: PMC7689506 PMID: 33239694

Abstract

Plants are endowed with a large pool of structurally diverse small molecules known as secondary metabolites. The present study aims to virtually screen these plant secondary metabolites (PSM) for their possible anti-SARS-CoV-2 properties targeting four proteins/ enzymes which govern viral pathogenesis. Results of molecular docking with 4,704 ligands against four target proteins, and data analysis revealed a unique pattern of structurally similar PSM interacting with the target proteins. Among the top-ranked PSM which recorded lower binding energy (BE), > 50% were triterpenoids which interacted strongly with viral spike protein—receptor binding domain, > 32% molecules which showed better interaction with the active site of human transmembrane serine protease were belongs to flavonoids and their glycosides, > 16% of flavonol glycosides and > 16% anthocyanidins recorded lower BE against active site of viral main protease and > 13% flavonol glycoside strongly interacted with active site of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. The primary concern about these PSM is their bioavailability. However, several PSM recorded higher bioavailability score and found fulfilling most of the drug-likeness characters as per Lipinski's rule (Coagulin K, Kamalachalcone C, Ginkgetin, Isoginkgetin, 3,3′-Biplumbagin, Chrysophanein, Aromoline, etc.). Natural occurrence, bio-transformation, bioavailability of selected PSM and their interaction with the target site of selected proteins were discussed in detail. Present study provides a platform for researchers to explore the possible use of selected PSM to prevent/ cure the COVID-19 by subjecting them for thorough in vitro and in vivo evaluation for the capabilities to interfering with the process of viral host cell recognition, entry and replication.

Subject terms: Computational biology and bioinformatics, Drug discovery

Introduction

Coronaviruses (CoV) are spherical or pleomorphic, enveloped, non-segmented particles contain positive-sense single-stranded RNA¹. There are several types of low to high pathogenic CoV which cause mild to severe respiratory symptoms. In general, it is classified under four genera such as α, β, γ, and δ CoV. α and β-CoV are reported to cause fatal respiratory tract infections in mammals, among which Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-CoV (SARS-CoV) is grouped under β-CoV. Whereas, γ, and δ CoV are reported to infect birds². In last three decades, several CoV virus related diseases have been frequently reported in human and animals such as human CoV OC43, 299E, Bovin CoV, Canine CoV, Feline CoV, Porcine CoV, etc., indicating their increasing competence to expand their host range³. But, their capabilities to cause fatality in human was realized with the SARS outbreak occurred during 2002 and 2003^4,5. Recent addition to this list is, Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 which is much more fatal to humans than their earlier versions.

COVID-19 was first spotted in a seafood market of Wuhan city, Hubei Province of China, and now it had reached all continents across the globe⁶. Based on genomic sequence evidence, bat CoV RaTG13 shares 96.2% similarity with SARS-CoV-2. Hence, bats are suspected as a primary source of SARS-CoV-2 and infected humans through several intermediate hosts^7,8. However, this hypothesis is yet to be proved. The SARS-CoV-2 virus causes SARS by the onset of pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multi-organ dysfunction. Moreover, the SARS-CoV-2 enters the human body through the mouth and other openings and spreads primarily through droplets, saliva, or discharges from the nose/ mouth of an infected person after sneezing or coughing⁹. On 11th March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 as a pandemic. As on 27th July, 2020 the global COVID-19 data show 1,61,14,449 confirmed cases and 6,46,641 confirmed deaths (http://www.who.int).

At present, there are no pharmaceutical products approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as safe and effective for the treatment of COVID-19. Further, as precautionary measures, surveillance borders, personal hygiene, social distancing, lockdown, supportive care and personal protective equipment are practiced across the world to prevent disease spreading among the communities. Preliminary in vitro studies and clinical trials carried out by scientists on COVID-19 patients disclosed the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine, an anti-malarial drug in combination with azithromycin, a broad spectrum anti-bacterial drug in reducing the disease severity¹⁰. Similarly, the use of several off-label medicines (such as lopinavir-ritonavir, favipiravir, remdesivir, ribavirin, anti-Interleukin-6 inhibitors, etc.) have been suggested to treat COVID-19 as potential investigational drugs. But, on 4th July, 2020, based on the results obtained from the solidarity trials, WHO ruled out the possible use of hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir-ritonavir as anti-COVID-19 drug (WHO, 2020). Similarly, researchers across the world attempting to identify/ develop drug molecule targeting several viral pathogenicity factors such as, spike protein-human Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) mediated viral entry, main protease (M^pro), papain-like protease 2 (PLP2), RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), SARS-CoV helicase, etc¹¹. Any new drug molecule requires thorough scientific evaluation in terms of their anti-viral potencies, efficacy, bioavailability, adverse effect on non-target site, safety, different stages of preclinical and clinical trials, etc. before available for the public use.

Plants are known to inherently contain a large number of structurally diverse secondary metabolites which are developed during the course of evolution, primarily as defence mechanisms against herbivores and predators, mediating pollination and for protection against abiotic stress¹². The variability of metabolites can be seen across different plant families, genera, species and different parts of the same plant species¹³. The concentrations of PSM vary according to the growth stages and in response to biotic and abiotic stress to which plant exposed. The development of drugs from phytopharmaceuticals is a trending approach to look for eco-friendly therapeutic molecules with no or minimal side-effects. This time-bound situation requires an efficient and effective method to develop therapeutics which disables the virus molecular machinery. Considering the safety of the users, any conventional drug discovery plan is a time-consuming process that sometimes takes decades to complete. Thus, repurposing the already available FDA approved drugs, use of plant-based herbal medicines, or edible plant parts rich in anti-viral PSM are other strategies appears to be promising under current situations.

In silico or computational approaches are algorithm-based virtual screening methods developed for screening a large number of molecules in shorter time and identification of probable potent drug candidate. In recent research, 1,903 approved drugs were virtually screened through molecular docking, and binding free energy calculations suggested nelfinavir as a potential inhibitor against SARS-CoV-2¹⁴. Similarly, phytomolecules such as kaempferol, quercetin, luteolin-7-glucoside, demethoxycurcumin, naringenin, apigenin-7-glucoside, oleuropein, curcumin, catechin, and epicatechin-gallate have been reported as potential viral M^pro inhibition¹⁵. Elfiky¹⁶ reported Ribavirin, Remdesivir, Sofosbuvir, Galidesivir, and Tenofovir as potent drug candidates against RdRp of SARS-CoV-2 through molecular docking studies.

Most of the earlier PSM based virtual screening performed were either limited by the number of PSM, structural diversity of test ligands and number of target proteins. Hence, the present study is aimed to (i) creating a structurally diverse PSM library, (ii) finding potent PSM which binds to the target site of selected proteins/ enzymes with low binding energy (BE), (iii) studying structural and functional relation of top scored PSM, and (iv) analyzing the physicochemical characters and bioavailability of selected PSM using SwissADME.

Results and discussion

The PSM library contains 4,704 molecules collected from 203 plant species belong to diverse plant families (Supplementary File 1). Over 22,000 docking reactions were run (which include replications, to confirm the activity of several molecules with BE) using 4,704 ligands against four selected target proteins/ enzymes involved in host cell recognition, entry and replication of SARS-CoV-2. Upon molecular docking, a wide range of BE was obtained for all four target proteins. The obtained results were arranged in ascending order of BE. For the ease of the study, we selected the top 268 molecules against M^pro and 250 molecules for all other target proteins for further analysis (Supplementary File 2) viz., structural similarity and activity relationship, and physicochemical characterization to evaluate their drug-likeness. Binding energy, physicochemical characters and bioavailability score (BAS) of ten top ranked molecules against four target proteins are compiled in Table 1.

Table 1.

Binding energy of top ranked plant secondary metabolites against four targets of SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and their physicochemical properties.

Code	Name	BE	MW	RB	HA	HD	TPSA	MLogP	PGP	GI	LV	BAS
SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein
B0162-10327320	Bismahanine	− 9.1	692.8	7	4	4	90.50	6.18	Yes	Low	2	0.17
C0572-100920596	Coagulin N	− 9.1	648.7	4	12	6	192.44	− 0.36	Yes	Low	3	0.17
A0297-16162334	Arecatannin A3	− 8.9	1443.2	9	30	25	551.90	− 3.21	Yes	Low	3	0.17
C0563-15970528	Coagulin K	− 8.9	616.7	4	10	4	151.98	1.16	Yes	Low	1	0.55
G0134-16129878	Tannic acid	− 8.9	1701.2	31	46	25	777.98	− 4.24	Yes	Low	3	0.17
K0070-101721039	Kamalachalcone C	− 8.8	530.5	4	8	4	147.14	1.92	No	Low	1	0.55
A0155-5281600	Amentoflavone	− 8.7	538.4	3	10	6	181.80	0.25	No	Low	2	0.17
P0479-16398499	Pseudojervine	− 8.7	587.7	3	9	5	137.71	1.02	Yes	High	1	0.55
F0096-643975	Flavin adenine dinucleotide	− 8.6	785.5	13	20	9	382.55	− 3.77	Yes	Low	3	0.11
G0075-156783	Graecunin E	− 8.6	1047.1	11	22	12	335.06	− 3.68	Yes	Low	3	0.17
SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp)
E0189-3564542	Eriodictyol-7-O-rutinoside	− 9.9	596.5	6	15	9	245.29	− 3.24	Yes	Low	3	0.17
N0007-442431	Narirutin	− 9.7	580.5	6	14	8	225.06	− 2.77	Yes	Low	3	0.17
H0135-191266	Hippomannin A	− 9.6	634.4	6	18	11	318.50	− 2.90	Yes	Low	3	0.17
I0135-5318569	Isoginkgetin	− 9.5	566.5	5	10	14	159.80	0.63	No	Low	1	0.55
K0010-5491813	*Kaempferol	− 9.5	600.4	7	15	9	257.04	− 2.30	No	Low	3	0.17
M0284-44259428	Myricetin 3-rutinoside	− 9.5	626.5	6	17	11	289.66	− 4.35	Yes	Low	3	0.17
R0047-441943	Rotundioside B	− 9.5	1184.3	15	26	13	428.71	− 3.89	Yes	Low	3	0.11
T0047-73179	Tellimagradin I	− 9.5	786.5	9	22	13	385.26	− 3.08	Yes	Low	3	0.17
A0245-5281599	Agathisflavone	− 9.4	538.4	3	10	6	181.80	0.25	No	Low	2	0.17
E0140-119058016	Emblicanin A	− 9.4	782.5	6	22	12	374.26	− 2.33	Yes	Low	3	0.11
Human transmembrane serine protease (TMPRSS2)
G0154-14982	Glycyrrhizic acid	− 9.5	822.9	7	16	8	267.04	0.02	Yes	Low	3	0.11
C0387-366355	cis-Miyabenol C	− 9.4	680.7	6	9	7	160.07	3.43	No	Low	2	0.17
P0126-124025	Proanthocyanidin A2	− 9.2	576.5	2	12	9	209.76	0.14	No	Low	3	0.17
G0038-131752181	Granatin B	− 9.1	952.6	3	27	14	450.25	− 3.45	Yes	Low	3	0.17
H0134-101601938	Hippophaenin B	− 9.1	1104.7	7	31	19	542.17	− 3.90	Yes	Low	3	0.11
C0126-101710863	3-Caffeoyl-5-Feruloylquinic Acid	− 9	530.4	10	12	16	200.28	− 0.15	Yes	Low	3	0.11
B0138-183757	3,3′-Biplumbagin	− 8.9	374.3	1	6	2	108.74	0.62	No	High	0	0.55
A0245-5281599	Agathisflavone	− 8.9	538.4	3	10	6	181.80	0.25	No	Low	2	0.17
A0156-362574	Aromoline	− 8.9	594.7	2	8	2	83.86	3.37	No	High	1	0.55
C0453-6324923	Chrysophanein	− 8.9	416.3	3	9	5	153.75	− 1.26	Yes	Low	0	0.55
SARS-CoV-2 Main protease (Mpro)
H0349-3663	Hypericin	− 10.4	504.4	0	8	6	155.52	1.36	No	Low	2	0.17
A0155-5281600	Amentoflavone	− 9.7	538.4	3	10	6	181.80	0.25	No	Low	2	0.17
T0163-44584734	Terflavin B	− 9.7	784.5	8	22	13	385.24	− 2.83	Yes	Low	3	0.17
M0522-21593828	Mudanpioside J	− 9.6	630.5	11	14	5	199.90	− 0.04	Yes	Low	2	0.17
Q0019-44259101	Quercetin 3,5-digalactoside	− 9.6	626.5	7	17	11	289.66	− 4.62	No	Low	3	0.17
V0041-168165	Vescalagin	− 9.6	934.6	0	26	16	455.18	− 3.23	Yes	Low	3	0.17
G0227-5271805	Ginkgetin	− 9.5	566.5	5	10	4	159.80	0.63	No	Low	1	0.55
I0135-5318569	Isoginkgetin	− 9.5	566.5	5	10	14	159.80	0.63	No	Low	1	0.55
C0163-44256718	Cyanidin 3,5-diglucoside	− 9.4	611.5	7	16	11	272.59	− 3.82	No	Low	3	0.17
D0307-15922818	*Delphinidin	− 9.4	611.5	8	14	9	239.97	− 1.18	No	Low	3	0.17

Open in a new tab

Only top 10 ranked molecules against each target are represented here. Details of all the plants secondary metabolites studied are available in Supplementary Files 2 and 3.

BE, binding energy (Kcal/mol); MW, molecular weight (g/mol); RB, number of rotatable bonds; HA, number of H-bond acceptors; HD, Number of H-bond donors; TPSA, total polar surface area (Å²); MLogP, predicted octanol/water partition coefficient; PGP-S, pgp substrate; GI, GI tract crossing, LV, Number of Lipinski’s rule violation; BAS: bioavailability score.

*Kaempferol 3-O-(6′'-galloyl)-beta-D-glucopyranoside; *Delphinidin-3-O-(6-p-coumaroyl) glucoside.

SARS-CoV-2 spike protein

Spike protein is a class I fusion protein present within the envelope as a homotrimer and consists of three S1-S2 heterodimers. The receptor-binding domain (RBD) is located on the head of S1¹⁷ and binds with the cellular receptor hACE2¹⁸. Any PSM interacts with these selected Amino acid residues (AARs) of spike protein by forming multiple H bonds and other interactions with lower BE may interfere with the spike protein -hACE2 interactions, thereby preventing the early recognition of host cell by SARS-CoV-2.

Interestingly, the large pool of PSM found interacting with the exposed surface of spike protein was found belonging to class triterpenoids. More than 50% of the PSM among top 250 molecules belong to triterpenoids and their derivatives, largely include triterpenes and sterols. Here, sterol lactones alone represent > 14% of total PSM (Fig. 1a). Few biflavonoids, flavonoid glycoside and hydrolysable tannins were also showed promising results.

(a) Structural activity relationship: correlation of canonical SMILES structure similarity (data points are joined by colored lines) and binding energy (represented in different color shades of data point) of selected plant secondary metabolites (PSM) evaluated against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein using Data Warrior software. Structurally similar molecules are grouped in dotted lines and a representative molecule with low binding energy (kcal/mol) (values in parenthesis) is represented in box. More than 50% of the PSM among top 250 molecules studied belong to triterpenoids and their derivatives, with > 14% Sterol lactones. (b) Data analysis of selected PSM against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. (A) Bioavailability radar chart representing lipophilicity (LIPO), Molecular weight (SIZE), Topological polar surface area (POLAR), Solubility (INSOLU), Flexibility (FLEX) and Saturation (INSATU) along with Bioavailability score (BAS) of selected molecules, (B) 3D visualization of protein–ligand interaction using PyMOL (selected amino acid residue of target site of protein are colored in cyan, and (C) 2D visualization of different types of interactions between ligand and target site of protein using Discovery Studio software (different types of interactions are represented in color codes).

Coagulins from Withania coagulans (Stocks) Dunal were recorded lower BE with target AARs of the spike protein. Similar observations were made with structurally similar triterpene and steroid, i.e., steroidal lactones, steroidal saponins, steroidal glycoalkaloids, triterpene glycosides, triterpene saponins, and triterpene sterols. Coagulin N recorded a least of − 9.1 BE followed by Coagulin K (BE -8.9). Coagulin N forms H bond with ARG403, TYR449 and GLY496 of spike protein, whereas Coagulin K forms H bond with ARG403, GLY496, GLN498 and TYR505, which may interfere with viral host cell recognition process. Also, both Coagulin N and Coagulin K recorded 0.55 BAS, and passed all the Lipinski's rule of drug-likeness except molecular weight (MW) (Fig. 1b, Supplementary File 2).

Withanolides are naturally occurring C₂₈-Steroidal lactone triterpenoids build on an intact or rearranged estrogen framework^19–21, commonly found in Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal and W. coagulans (Stocks) Dunal. Withanolide E recorded the least BE of − 8.4 followed by Withanone (-8.3), Ashwagandhanolide (-8.3) and Withastramonolide (− 8.2) (Supplementary File 2). Withanolide E showed H bond formation with GLN493 and TYR453 AARs of spike protein (Fig. 1b, Supplementary File 2) with BAS 0.55. Withanolides are smaller in molecular weight with high GI absorption and follow all the characters of the drug-like molecules as per Lipinski's rule (Supplementary File 3).

Saponins are naturally occurring plant glycosides found in a wide range of plant species. They are high molecular weight amphiphilic compounds having triterpenoids and steroid aglycon as lipophilic moiety and sugars as hydrophilic moiety²². Another class of basic steroidal saponins contains nitrogen analogues of steroid sapogenins as aglycones. The bio-transformation of saponins mainly occurs at intestine with the aid of gut microbes leading to the generation of the rare low molecular weight saponins containing no or lower number of sugar moiety²³. These hydrolyzed products are higher in bioavailability and bioactivity compared to their parental compounds^24–26. In our study, Graecunin E (from Trigonella foenum-graecum L.)²⁷ recorded a least of − 8.6 BE and found interacting with THR415 and GLN493 AARs of spike protein (Fig. 1b, Supplementary File 2). Other Graecunin related compounds, Trigofoenoside E1 (BE − 8.2), Uttronin B (BE -8.3), Stigmasteryl glucoside (BE − 7.9) and Yuccagenin (BE − 7.6) also showed promising results. It was noticed that BE of above-mentioned molecules was related to their number of the sugar moiety. As the number of sugar moiety reduces, BE also found reducing. However, with the loss of sugar moiety, their bioavailability was increasing as observed between Greacunin E and Yuccagenin (aglycon form) (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Files 2 and 3). Also, Yuccagenin was found forming H bonds with GLY496 and ASN501 AARs of spike protein which is crucial to interact with AARs of hACE2 and found fulfilling all drug-likeness characters as per Lipinski's rule (Fig. 1b).

Bismahanine, a carbazole alkaloid isolated from leaves of Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng^28,29 and some other Rutaceae members³⁰. Bismahanin and related compounds are reported for their broad biological activities such as anti-oxidant, anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial, anti-cancerous, anti-viral, etc.^31–33. In our studies, physicochemical properties of Bismahanin revealed it as a low polar, non-soluble, high MLOGP value and high molecular weight PSM according to Lipinski's rule of drug-likeness, which reduces its bioavailability (BAS 0.17). The molecule interacted with residue GLU406 through H bonds and showed Van der Waals interaction with other residues (TYR495, LEU455, ASN501 and GLY502) of spike protein which are not reported to involve in interaction with AARs of hACE2 (Fig. 1b, Supplementary File 2). Pseudojervine, a steroidal alkaloid was first isolated from the rhizome of Veratrum album L. by Wright and Luff³⁴ which is regularly used in Chinese traditional medicine. In the present study, Pseudojervin recorded − 8.7 BE and found interacting with AARs GLN493, GLY496 and SER494 of spike protein through H bonds. Also, it passed all the Lipinski’s rule except molecular weight (587.74 g/mol) and recorded 0.55 BAS (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Files 2 and 3).

Tannic acid is a high molecular weight polyphenolic compound, highly soluble in water (low lipophilicity). Its GI absorption is almost nil in its original form. However, it is hypothesized that bio-transformed products may enter into plasma and exert biological activities which still need a thorough study. In our study, Tannic acid recorded lower BE of − 8.9, and some of the structurally related hydrolysable tannins such as Strictinin (BE − 8.6), Punicalagin (BE − 8.5), Terchebulin (BE − 8.4), Tercatain (BE − 8.3), Terflavin A (BE − 8.1) also showed promising results (Supplementary File 2).

Arecatannin A3 (a condensed tannins) contains epicatechin-epicatechin-epicatechin-epicatechin-catechin as their basic structure and in its original form it is poorly bioavailable because of their unfavourable physicochemical properties (Supplementary File 3). But, its bio-transformed products, especially monomers, dimers or trimers, may show a varied degree of bioavailability and bioactivity. Their monomers catechin and epicatechin are reported as bioavailable better than their parental molecules³⁵. However, their dimer and trimers are poorly bio-available³⁶. In our studies, none of the catechin or epicatechin, and their derivatives were appeared in top 250 PSM rank indicating their inability to bind an open surface of the spike protein. Some Arecatannin related molecules such as Arecatannin B1 (BE − 8.1), Proanthocyanidine A-6 (BE − 7.9) and Proanthocyanidine A1 (BE − 7.6) also found interacting with spike protein (Supplementary File 2).

Kamalachalcone C is a dimeric chalcone first isolated from Mallotus philippensis (Lam.) Müll. Arg. by Furusawa et al.³⁷. It recorded − 8.8 BE and was found interacting with AARs GLN493, GLN492, ARG403 and GLU406 of the spike protein. Bioavailability score of 0.55 was recorded by Kamalachalcone C, indicating it as a potent drug candidate (Fig. 1b, Supplementary File 2). Amentoflavone, a biflavone also recorded a lower BE of − 8.7 and showed H bond formation with AARs GLN493, SER494 and GLY496 of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Fig. 1b).

Recent studies also reported several PSM such as Pavetannin-C1 (BE − 11.1), Hesperidin (BE − 10.4), Cannabinoids (BE − 10.2), Cinnamtannin-B1 (BE − 10.2) with lower BE as a potential molecules to reduce the pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 by blocking the spike protein RBD and hACE2 interactions (Supplementary File 4).

Human transmembrane serine protease (TMPRSS2)

TMPRSS2 plays a key role in priming spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. The cellular protease cleaves at S1/S2 and S′2 sites thereby facilitating the fusion of viral and host cell membrane³⁸. Hence, reducing the protease activity of TMPRSS2 using PSM is considered as another potential way to manage COVID-19. In our study, structural similarity and BE correlation analysis indicated that a large number of flavonoid glucoside (> 32%) were found interacting with the target site of TMPRSS2, followed by ellagitannins and triterpenoids. Interestingly, two triterpenoid saponins (Liquorice and Glycyrrhizic acid) and a stilbenoid (Cis-Miyabenol C) recorded the lowest BE (Fig. 2a). The data obtained from this study indicated the possibilities of developing flavonoid glycoside or triterpenoid based drug molecules targeting human TMPRSS2 which process SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and facilitate the entry of the virus into the host cell.

In our study, a large number of flavonoid glycosides were found efficiently binding to the target site of protein with lower BE. Similarly, in most of the earlier in vitro studies, flavonoid glycosides are proved to be better candidates for enzyme inhibition activity related to health benefits. However, significant concern about flavonoid glycosides is their bioavailability. Upon consumption, at the small intestine, they absorbed mostly in their aglycon form at the cellular level. Absorption of glycosidic form mainly depends on their number of sugar moiety. Through many research studies, it was confirmed that flavonoid glycosides are converted to aglycones by gut microbes and decomposed to yield two different phenolic products. Whereas, catechin and procyanidins are bio-transformed into 5-(hydroxyphenyl)-γ-valerolactone found in blood plasma and urine as sulfate and glucuronide metabolites³⁹. However, several earlier studies supported the hypothesis that glycosidic forms are more bioavailable and resistant to microbial degradation. Also, they can deliver aglycone moiety better when administrated as glycosidic form. Participation of active uptake of flavonoid glycosides by enterocytes was researched in detail. During this process, flavonoid glycosides are converted into aglycones by membrane-bound beta-glucosidase (reviewed by Kumar and Pandey)⁴⁰. Here, Agatisflavone, a bioflavonoid recorded a BE of − 8.9 and found interacting with catalytic site AARs SER441 of TMPRSS2 forming hydrogen bonds. Nirurin, a prenylated flavonone glycoside found in Phyllanthus niruri L. recorded a BE of − 8.9 and showed H bond formation with HIS296 and SER441 of TMPRSS2 catalytic site and with VAL290, SER436, GLY439 and CYS465 in close vicinity of the catalytic site, presenting itself as a strong irreversible inhibitor of TMPRSS2 (Fig. 2b, Supplementary File 2). Following to this, Naringin, a flavanone-7-O-glycoside recorded BE of − 8.3 and showed similar interaction with AARs of TMPRSS2 (Supplementary File 2). All these molecules are low in their BAS and their physicochemical characters are not favourable as per Lipinski’s rule (Supplementary File 3).

Though the flavonoids are dominating the group in numbers, the least BE was recorded by two triterpenoid saponins, i.e., Liquorice (− 9.7) and Glycyrrhizic acid (− 9.5) followed by a stilbenoid Cis-Miyabenol (− 9.4). Here, Liquorice was found forming H bond with SER441 of TMPRSS2 catalytic site AAR through glucose moiety. Similarly, Glycyrrhizic acid also showed H bond formation with HIS296 of TMPRSS2 through oxygen involved in a glycosidic bond. Liquorice and Glycyrrhizic acid are isomers, triterpenoid glycosides obtained from roots of Glycyrrhiza glabra L. (Liquorice). Roots of this plant are traditionally used to alleviate jaundice, gastritis and bronchitis. Gancao, a Chinese herbal decoction of dried plant roots and stem, contains 3.63–13.06% Glycyrrhizin and well known for their therapeutic properties, including antiviral⁴¹. Glycyrrhizic acid was reported as an active component from the roots of G. glabra which inhibited the growth and cytopathology of both DNA and RNA virus viz., Herpes simplex type I, Newcastle disease virus, Vesicular stomatitis virus and Polio type I virus without affecting host cell activity and replication. Research regarding the bioavailability of Glycyrrhizic acid revealed that after oral administration, only bio-transformed Glycyrrhetic acid was detected in plasma at higher concentration^42,43. It is because of the complete biotransformation of Glycyrrhizic acid to Glycyrrhetic acid by the activity of gut microbes. Hence, to know the capability of aglycon form, i.e., Glycyrrhetic acid (Enoxolone, not present in main PSM library) was docked and found it also form H bond with SER441 of TMPRSS2, but the BE was reduced to − 7.7 (Fig. 2b).

Cis-Miyabenol C, a stilbenoid (resveratrol timer) found in Foeniculum vulgare Mill. (fennel). Stilbenoids are characterized by two phenyl group linked by a transethane bond and reported to exhibit a wide range of biological activities and pharmacological properties⁴⁴. In the present study, Cis-Miyabenol C recorded a lower BE of − 9.4 and found interacting with catalytic site AAR of TMPRSS2, i.e., ASP345 through H bond (Fig. 2b, Supplementary File 2). This compound was low in GI absorption, highly lipophilic, insoluble in water and found violating Lipinski's rule of drug-likeness. The low bioavailability of stilbenoids is mainly due to their rapid, extensive metabolism in the intestine and liver during and after absorption giving rise to a lower level of the free parent compound⁴⁵.

Chrysophenols (Anthraquinones) are anthracene derivatives, and structurally they are tricyclic aromatic quinones with two ketone group attached to the central benzene ring. Here, two anthraquinone glycosides, Chrysophanein and Rhein-8-glycoside recorded lower BE of − 8.9 and − 8.9, respectively, which was lower than their structurally related flavonoid glycosides, Baicalein 6-glucoside (BE − 8.7) and Luteolin 3′-xyloside (BE − 8.5). Chrysophaenein showed H bond with SER441, an AAR of the catalytic site of TMPRSS2 and VAL280 and GLY439 in the catalytic pocket. Chrysophaenein passes all the parameters of Lipinski's rule with 0.55 BAS (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Files 2 and 3) proving itself as a better drug candidate to inhibit the activity of TMPRSS2.

Plumbagin is a naphthoquinone derivative from the roots of Plumbago zeylanica L. and well studied for its anti-cancerous property^46,47. In our study, 3,3′-Biplumbagin recorded BE of − 8.9 and found interacting with HIS296 and SER441 of the catalytic site of TMPRSS2 and with VAL280 and GLY439 AARs in the close vicinity, showing its strong affinity towards the catalytic domain of TMPRSS2. Also, it recorded higher BAS of 0.55 and found fulfilling all necessary physicochemical characters for a drug-like molecule as per Lipinski's rule (Fig. 2b, Supplementary File 2 and 3).

Quinic acid is a carboxylated cyclohexanepolyol that is found in several plants like coffee, tomato, carrot, etc. and exists either in free form or as esters⁴⁸. Quinic acid is a starting compound used to synthesise "Tamiflu", an anti-viral drug used to treat Influenza A and B virus⁴⁹. Derivatives of Quinic acid were reported to be anti-viral in nature against Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B virus (HBV), Herpes simplex virus 1 and Dengue virus^50–53. 3-Caffeoyl-5-feruloylquinic acid, in our study, recorded − 9.0 BE and found interacting with SER441 of TMPRSS2 through H bonding. Following this, structurally similar 3-O-Caffeoyloleanolic acid also recorded BE of − 8.7. Both the molecules recorded low BAS of 0.11 and violated Lipinski's rule of drug-likeness (Fig. 2b, Supplementary File 2). Studies of Gonthier et al.⁵⁴ showed that chlorogenic acids, the esters of caffic and quinic acid are poorly bioavailable. However, their microbial bio-transformed metabolites such as m-Coumaric acid and derivatives of phenylproponic, benzoic and hippuric acid were found in higher concentration after oral administration of chlorogenic acids. The anti-viral activity of bio-transformed molecules is yet to be studied.

In the present study, group of bulky Ellagitannins such as Terflavin A, Terflavin B, Punicalin, Strictinin, Pedunculagin, Punicafolin, Tellimagradin I, Tercatain, Emblicanin A, Phyllanemblinin B, etc. recorded lower binding efficiency indicating their capability to inhibit the activity of TMPRSS2 enzyme. Similarly, Granatin B, an ellagitannin commonly found in the pericarp of Punica granatum L. recorded lower BE of − 9.1 followed by Granatin A (− 8.9). Granatin B recorded H bond formation with HIS296 of TMPRSS2. Bioavailability score of Granatin B was 0.11 and found violating Lipinski’s rule (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Files 2 and 3). However, they are all high molecular weight, and according to previous studies, they are poorly/ not bioavailable. Further, they hydrolyze into Ellagic acid and their complex derivatives in the intestine and can cross the gastrointestinal barrier into the bloodstream⁵⁵. At the same time, gut microflora are reported to convert Ellagitannins to Urolithins, an anti-cancerous compounds^56,57. Bioavailability of Ellagitannins metabolites was successfully proved in humans in the form of Ellagic acid in blood plasma⁵⁸. Ellagic acid consists of a hydrophilic domain made up of four phenolic groups and two lactones, and a lipophilic domain made up of four rings. These domains, particularly the hydrophilic, which can H bond and accept an electron, thus determining a structural activity relationship. In our experiments, Ellagitannins derivatives 3′-O-Methyl ellagic acid 4-xyloside recorded BE of − 8.1 against TMPRSS2 (Supplementary File 2), indicating the possibilities of Ellagitannin metabolized products function as TMPRSS2 inhibitors.

Molecules such as Geniposide (BE − 14.6), Cytidine-5′-diphosphocholine (BE − 13.9), Durumolide K (BE − 13.2) and 5′-methoxyhydnocarpin D (BE − 13.5) were reported to be effective molecules of plant origin which can bind to active site of human TMPRSS2 and interfere with the viral spike protein priming activity (Supplementary File 4). However, with respect to TMPRSS2 activity inhibition, competitive inhibitors are preferred over uncompetitive/noncompetitive inhibitors as TMPRSS2 activity is an essential component of cellular structure and function.

SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease (M^pro)

The key enzyme in proteolytic processing of SARS-CoV-2 replication is M^pro. It is initially released by the auto-cleavage of pp1a and pp1ab. Then M^pro, in turn, cleaves pp1a and pp1ab to release functional proteins necessary for viral replication⁵⁹. Any PSM binding to the AARs of the catalytic site or pocket with H bonds and other interactions with lower BE may interfere with the viral replication process in host cell, thereby reducing the severity of the COVID-19.

When BE and canonical SMILES structural similarity of top 250 PSM were analyzed, it was observed that molecules from two major groups, i.e., Flavonol glycosides and Anthocyanidine were dominating with > 16% and > 16% PSM, respectively. Other flavonoids and triterpenes also recorded promising results (Fig. 3a). But, the least BE was recorded by Hypericin, a naphthodianthrone and Amentoflavone, a biflavonoid.

Hypericin, a naturally occurring chromophore “Naphthodianthrone” compound, derivative of anthraquinone found in common St. Johnswort (Hypericum species) and in some fungi. Hypericum perforatum L., a source of Hypericin has been used as folk medicine. Also, Hypericin is reported as anti-depressive, anti-tumor, anti-viral, antineoplastic, etc.⁶⁰. Here, Hypericin recorded least BE of − 10.4. Further, it was found forming H bond with GLU166 residue in catalytic sites of M^pro (Fig. 3b, Supplementary File 2). Physicochemical parameters of Hypericin showed that it is poorly soluble in water and violates Lipinski's rule of drug-likeness (Fig. 3b, Supplementary File 2) with 0.17 BAS. It is a naturally occurring photosensitizer reported to accumulate in tumour cells and upon illuminating release Reactive oxygen species (ROS) killing the cancerous cells⁶¹. Recent in silico studies revealed its potential to bind SARS-CoV-2 spike protein⁶². Additionally, its anti-viral properties against Bronchitis virus⁶³, Hepatitis C virus⁶⁴ and Human Coronavirus Oc43⁶⁵ represent it as a potential anti-viral drug material.

Sotetsuflavone, a biflavonoid from Dacrydium balansae Brongn. & Gris (Gymnosperm) was found to be the most potent inhibitor of Dengue virus NS5 RdRp with IC₅₀ of 0.16 µM, among 23 biflavonids screened. Further, their enzyme inhibitory activity was related to the number and position of methyl groups on the biflavonoid moiety and the degree of oxygenation on flavonoid monomers⁶⁶. In our studies, Amentoflavone recorded least of − 9.7 BE against M^pro and found interacting with target AAR by forming H bonds with GLU166 and other residues in the vicinity of catalytic site (Fig. 3b, Supplementary File 2). Similarly, other biflavonoids, both Ginkgetin and Isoginkgetin (derivatives of Amentoflavone from Ginkgo biloba L.) were recorded BE − 9.5 followed by Agatisflavone (BE − 9.3).

Flavonol glycosides are the most influential group of PSM found interacting with the target site of M^pro. Flavonols are the class of flavonoids that has 3-hydroxyflavone backbone and present in a large group of plants. Lower BE of − 9.6 was recorded by Quercetin 3,5-diglucoside followed by Myricetin 3-rutinoside (BE − 9.4), Rutin (BE − 9.3), Kempferol (BE − 9.2), Myricetin 3-rhamnoside (BE − 9.2), and Robinetin 3-rutinoside (BE − 9.1) (Fig. 3b, Supplementary File 2). It was observed that flavonol with two glucose moieties recorded lower BE when compared to flavonol with one or three glucose moieties. With regards to bioavailability, Graefe et al.⁶⁷ reported the heights of 2.3 and 2.1 µg/ml of quercetin glucuronides in plasma of human volunteers after oral administration of onion and quercetin-4′-O Glucoside, respectively. Similarly, the peaks of 4.3 and 4.0 µg/ml were recorded for buckwheat tea and rutin oral administration. The authors hypothesized that quercetin-4′-O glucoside and quercetin-3-O glucoside absorption might happen at a different site of GI tract and depend on the number of the sugar moiety. Further, plant matrix may have an additional effect on GI absorption of these flavonol glycosides.

Proanthocyanidins are a class of oligomeric flavonoids (condensed tannins) found in a variety of plants. They are formed by the condensation of catechin and epicatechin units. Studies on Proanthocyanidins reveal its poor bioavailability, its monomers viz., ( +)-catechin and (−)-epicatechin have been previously reported to cross GI track in its monomeric form or as conjugated metabolites³⁵. Further, its dimers are also reported to present in plasma and urine after consuming food and beverages rich in Proanthocyanidins^68,69. In our studies, Proanthocanidin A2 and Proanthocanidin B2 recorded least of − 9.4 BE followed by Procyanidine B1 (BE − 9.3). Further, their monomers/ dimers/ conjugates viz., (-)-Gallocatechin gallate (BE − 9.1), Epicatechin-3-gallate (BE − 9.0), Gallocatechin-(4alpha- > 8)-epigallocatechin (BE − 8.6) were found effective in the binding target site of SARS-CoV-2 M^pro (Supplementary File 2). Glycosidic anthocyanidin (anthocyanins), water-soluble pigments found in many fruits like grapes, bilberry, raspberry, blackberry, cherry, blueberry, etc. Here, Cyanidine-3,5, diglucoside recorded − 9.4 BE followed by Penodine 3,5 diglucoside (BE − 9.3). Further, H bond formation between Cyanidine-3,5, diglucoside and AARs GLY143 and SER144 of the catalytic site of M^pro was observed. It recorded a BAS of 0.17 and didn’t fulfill the criteria of a drug-like molecule as per Lipinski's rule (Fig. 3b, Supplementary File 2). Bioavailability of Cyanidine-3-glucoside was studied in human trials by Czank et al.⁷⁰ following the isotopically labeled compound. They found radioactivity in plasma, urine and breathe, indicating the absorption of the labeled compound. However, the study didn’t reveal the existence of bioactive metabolites; it may be in degraded forms of the parental compound.

Terflavin B, an ellagitannin (found in Terminalia chebula Retz. and T. catappa L.) recorded BE of − 9.7. Also, it was found forming H bonds with AARs HIS41, GLY143, SER144, CYS145 and GLU166 present in the catalytic site of SARS-CoV-2 M^pro. It is water-soluble, low in GI absorption and violates Lipinski's rule (Fig. 3b, Supplementary File 2). Aqueous extracts of T. chebula were reported to be inhibitory to Hepatites B virus infection in Hep G 2.2.15 cells⁷¹. Not much research studies on their bioavailability and anti-viral properties have been done with purified Terflavin B. Vescalagin, and Castalagin are ellagitannins found in oak and chestnut wood^72,73. They are water-soluble, high oxidizable and astringent⁷⁴. Here, Vescalagin recorded − 9.6 BE and found interacted with GLU166 residue of M^pro catalytic site through H bond, and Castalagin showed − 8.8 BE (Fig. 3b, Supplementary File 2). Vilhelmova et al.⁷⁵ demonstrated the anti-viral activity of Vescalagin and Castalagin against Herpes simplex virus type I and II. Also, these PSM synergistically inhibited the multiplication of test virus along with anti-viral compound Acyclovir.

Mudanpioside J is a monoterpene glucoside identified in Paeonia delavayi Franch. (Chinese medicinal plant), which was found inhibitory to Influenza virus neuraminidase⁷⁶. In our studies, Mudanpioside J recorded BE of − 9.6 and showed strong interaction with GLY143, SER144 and CYS145 residues of M^pro catalytic site through H bonds (Fig. 3b, Supplementary File 2). Studies on Pharmacokinetics properties of monoterpene glycosides are limited. Paeoniflorin and Albiflorin, Mudanpioside J related compounds were reported as low in oral bioavailability due to their poor membrane permeability and gut microbes-induced metabolism^77,78. SwissADME analysis of Mudanpioside J also indicated its P-glycoprotein substrate nature and violation of Lipinski’s rule with 0.17 BAS (Supplementary File 3).

Lignans were reported for their wide biological activities, including anti-viral against Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, Herpes simplex virus type 1 and 2, Epstein-Barr virus and Cytomegalovirus^79,80. Justalakonin is an Arylnaphthalene lignan glycoside isolated from Justicia purpurea L. In the present study, it recorded BE of − 9.4 and showed interaction with AARs GLY143 and SER144 of the catalytic site of M^pro through H bonding (Fig. 3b, Supplementary File 2). Physicochemical characterization revealed it was found violating Lipinski's rule with 0.17 BAS. Regarding its metabolism and bioavailability, not much research studies have been performed earlier. Similarly, structurally related PSM, Elenoside (BE − 8.9), Patentiflorin B (BE − 8.9) and Patentiflorin A (BE − 8.6) also recorded lower BE against M^pro (Supplementary File 2).

As per recent computational studies, molecules like Theaflavin-3–3′- digallate (BE − 12.4), Delphinidin 3,5-diglucoside (BE − 12.2) and Rutin (BE − 11.3) were reported as potential inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 M^pro with lowest BE and predicted to interfere with the process of viral replication within host cell (Supplementary File 4). However, bioavailability and biotransformation of such PSM are need to be studied in detail.

SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp)

The central component of coronaviral replication/ transcription machinery is RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp, also named nsp12) that constructs copies of its RNA genome playing the key role in replication and transcription of SARS-CoV-2 in the host cell^81,82. Because of its high sequence and structural conservation, it remains the target of choice for the prophylactic or curative treatment of several viral diseases. Studies on structural activity relationship and BE of PSM revealed that a large number of flavonol glycoside (> 13%) followed by hydrolysable tannins, anthocyanins and triterpenes were found interacting with target site of RdRp with lower BE (Fig. 4a). Though the number of flavonol glycosides were high, the lowest BE was recorded by Erodictyol-7-O-glycoside and Narirutin belong to group flavanon glycosides. Interestingly, none of the PSM analyzed was found interacting with VAL557 of RdRp. However, they found forming H bond and another type of interactions with AARs in the catalytic pocket probably sterically hinders the substrate interaction with the catalytic site, thereby reducing the RdRp activity.

Eriodictyol-7-O-rutinosideis a flavanone glycoside commonly found in lemon⁸³, also called as lemon or citrus flavonoid. It recorded − 9.9 BE and found interacting with ARG553, ALA554, THR556, ASP618, TRY619 and ASP623 in the active site of RdRp. Both glycone and aglycone moiety of this molecule were found involved in H bond formation with the target site of RdRp. Similarly, Narirutin, another flavanone glycoside which naturally presents in sweet oranges recorded lower BE of − 9.7 and a similar pattern of H bond formation with a catalytic pocket of RdRp was observed. Both molecules recorded BAS of 0.17, indicating their low bioavailability and found violating Lipinski’s rule (Fig. 4b, Supplementary File 2). Structurally similar compounds, Nirurin from P. niruri and Naringin from grapefruits also showed promising results with BE − 9.0 and − 8.9, respectively.

Myricetin 3-rutinoside is a flavonol glycoside isolated from Chrysobalanus icaco L.⁸⁴ and other related plant species recorded − 9.5 BE. This molecule was found forming a large number of H bond with AARs ASP452, TYR456, ARG553, ALA554, ARG555, CYS622, ASP623 and SER682 showing its capability of strongly interacting with the target protein. Similarly, Kempferol (flavonol glycoside) also recorded − 9.5 BE. For both the compounds BAS was found to 0.11 (Fig. 4b, Supplementary File 2 and 3). Rhoifolin and Isorhoifolin are flavone glycoside reported from Rhus succedanea L.⁸⁵ and several citrus plants and onions. It is reported as anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial, hepatoprotective and anti-cancerous (reviewed by Refaat et al.⁸⁶). Though they recorded lower BE, Rhoifolin and Isorhoifolin were not interacting with AARs close to the active site of RdRp. Isoginkgetin, a biflavonoid from G. biloba recorded lower BE of − 9.5 followed by Agatisflavone (BE − 9.4) and ginkgetin (BE − 9.2). Isoginkgetin was found interacting with ARG553, THR556, THR687 and ALA685 of RdRp catalytic pocket. Compared to flavonoids glycosides, aglycons were frequently reported to be bioavailable. Hence, Myricetin, a monomeric aglyconic flavonoid, was analyzed and recorded BE − 8.4. Further, Myrcitin showed H bond with ARG553, ARG555, ARG624 and THR680 of RdRp active site, proving itself as a better candidate for developing drug targeting SARS-CoV-2 RdRp. Similarly, Quercitin glycosides were found promising, but quercetin was not able to appear in the list of top-ranked PSM.

Rotundioside B is a triterpenoid glycoside (Saponin) found in Bupleurum rotundifolium L.⁸⁷ and reported as an anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative^88,89. Here, Rotundioside B recorded − 9.5 BE and formed H bond with ASP452, SER501, ALA554, ASP623, ARG624, ASN691, SER759 and ASP760 of RdRp catalytic pocket proving itself as a strong contender of an anti-viral drug. However, this molecule recorded poor BAS of 0.11 and violated Lipinski's rule of drug-likeness (Fig. 4b, Supplementary File 2). Similar to this, Ginsenoside Ro, a triterpene saponin from roots of Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer. and related plants recorded − 9.4 BE. Trigofoenoside G, a steroidal saponin from plants and seeds of T. foenum-graecum was found interacting with RdRp with − 9.3 BE and forms H bonds with ASP452, LYS500, ALA554, ALA558, LYS621 and ALA685 of catalytic pocket (Fig. 4b, Supplementary File 2). Following to this, Trigofoenoside F and Trigofoenoside A recorded − 8.9 and − 8.4 BE, respectively (Supplementary File 2).

Hippomanin A, an ellagitannin found in Hippomane mancinella L. is known for its toxic properties. It causes oropharyngeal and gastrointestinal tract lesions, hypotension and bradycardia^90,91. Here, Hippomannin A recorded − 9.6 BE and forms H bond with ARG553, TYR619, ARG624, THR680, SER682 and ASP760 with target site of RdRp. A structurally similar molecule, Tellimagrandin I found widely in fruits, nuts and vegetables. Tellimargrandin was reported for its wide spectra of biological activities (reviewed by Zheng et al.⁹²). Here, it recorded − 9.5 BE followed by Punigluconin (BE − 9.3). Other hydrolysable tannins viz., Emblicanin A and Phyllanemblinin C found in fruits of Indian Gooseberry (Emblica officinalis Gaertn.) were recorded lower BE of − 9.4 and − 9.3, respectively. As the above discussed hydrolysable tannins are highly water-soluble and larger in molecular weight, their bioavailability in their original form is a major concern. Some of the molecules, structure similar to their bio-transformed metabolites with higher bioavailability, like Ellagic acid (BE − 8.3), 3′-O-methyl ellagic acid-4-xyloside (BE − 8.4), and 3,3′-Di-O-methyl ellagic acid (BE − 8.2) also recorded promising results indicating the possible involvement of ellagitannins bio-transformed products in inhibiting RdRp activity thereby reducing the COVID-19 severity.

Recent studies also reported several PSM such as Cyanidin 3-(6″-manlonylglycoside) (BE − 11.5), Caftaric acid (BE − 10.6) and Chrysophanol 8-(6-galloylglucoside) (BE − 9.9) with lowest binding energy as a potential molecules to reduce the pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 by suppressing the activity of RdRp thereby reducing the viral multiplication capability inside host cell (Supplementary File 4).

Conclusion

From the obtained results, it could be concluded that virtual screening of large number of PSM through molecular docking is a promising preliminary step towards developing an effective drug against a desired target protein/ enzyme by understanding their structure–activity relationship. Here, more than the BE of a PSM, its bioavailability also plays a crucial role in determining its biological activity under in vivo environmental conditions. Triterpenoid based PSM structures (Coagulins, Withanolides, Pseudojervine, Kamalachalcone, etc.) are hypothesized as potent drug molecules which can be used to block surface AARs of spike protein which interacts with hACE2, thereby preventing host cell recognition by SARS-CoV-2. In the case of TMPRSS2, M^pro and RdRp, molecules belong to flavonoid glycosides, biflavonoids, ellagitannins, anthocyanidins, triterpens, etc. (Table 1) can be explored. Though the large numbers of PSM were found violating Lipinski’s rule and recorded lower BAS, they can’t be ignored. Because several bio-transformed structure of these PSM are highly bioavailable and they may retain structural moiety of the parental compound. These bio-transformed molecules may further interact with the target site of a protein and exert similar results as observed in molecular docking studies. In our study, most of the potential anti-SARS-CoV-2 PSM were well studied for human consumption to manage various diseases and disorders previously. Also their controlled administration was proved to be non-toxic to humans. By considering the above facts, the possibilities of using these molecules along with the existing best practices to be explored immediately. Further, to streamline the large pools of PSM, they can be subjected for several in vitro and in vivo studies.

Materials and methods

Preparation of plant secondary metabolites library

To prepare PSM library, an extensive literature survey was conducted on selected plants and the general and species-specific PSM including Alkaloids, Phenolics and Terpenoids were listed. The 3D and 2D structures (SDF Files), and canonical SMILES of the selected PSM were retrieved from online databases such as PubChem (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and ChemSpider (https://www.chemspider.com). The 2D structures were converted into 3D coordinates, and geometries were optimized by using Marvin Sketch (https://www.chemaxon.com/products/marvin/marvinsketch). As several PSM are present in multiple plant species, an approximate 6% duplication was allowed in the main PSM library. Additionally, PSM isomers were considered as separate ligands. All the files were coded and used for further studies.

Target proteins

In the present study, we selected four target proteins, one from human (human transmembrane serine protease 2, TMPRSS2) and three from SARS-CoV-2 (spike protein, M^pro and RdRp). These selected enzymes/ proteins are well studied for their involvement in host cell recognition, membrane fusion, and viral replication in host cell, which are critical stages in determining viral pathogenicity. The crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound with hACE2 (PDB ID: 6M0J) (2.45 Å) was retrieved from Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB) Protein Data Bank (PDB) (RCSB, http://www.rcsb.org)⁹³ and hACE2 was removed, processed and used for docking studies. The 14 amino acid residues (AARs) (THR415, ASN439, TYR449, TYR453, LEU455, PHE486, ASN487, TYR489, GLN493, GLN498, THR500, ASN501, GLY502 and TYR505) of spike protein that are key for binding hACE2⁹⁴ were considered as active sites for molecular docking process. The TMPRSS2 sequence (NP_001128571.1) was retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) protein database. The structure of TMPRSS2 was generated by using the SWISS-MODEL online server⁹⁵. The structures were marked, superimposed and visualized by using Chimera⁹⁶. Model 1 of our work and O15393 present in UniProt were found 100% similar. Three amino acid residues (HIS296, ASP345 and SER441) of catalytic site⁹⁷ were considered as key residues of TMPRSS2 in the molecular docking process. The crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 M^pro (PDB ID: 6LU7) (2.16 Å)⁹⁸ was retrieved from RCSB-PDB and used for docking studies after processing. M^pro has three domains, and the active site is located between domain I and II. Here, CYS145-HIS41/SER144-HIS163 can act as a nucleophilic agent and GLY143 and GLU166 can form hydrogen bonds with “CO–NH-Cα-CO–NH-Cα” structure of the backbone of the substrate protein. These six residues were considered as the critical residues of M^pro in the molecular docking process⁹⁹. The SARS-CoV-2 RdRp protein sequence (YP_009725307.1) was retrieved from the NCBI protein database. The structure of RdRp was generated by using the SWISS-MODEL online server⁹⁵. The structure was marked, superimposed and visualized by using Chimera⁹⁶. The amino acid residue VAL557 in motif F⁸² was considered as a critical residue of RdRp in the molecular docking process.

Removal of water molecules, metal ions, cofactors, and addition of charges and hydrogen atoms were done by UCSF Chimera tool⁹⁶. Computing energy minimization and reconstruction of missing atoms and to perform stereo-chemical quality checks to come up at the best possible 3D structures were done through Discovery Studio software (Dassault Systèmes BIOVIA, Discovery Studio Modeling Environment, Version 3, San Diego: Dassault Systèmes, 2019).

Molecular docking

The ligands were energy minimized by conjugate gradients optimization algorithm with total numbers of 200 steps performed as a default universal force field (UFF) parameters¹⁰⁰. The capability of ligands to interact with the target site of selected proteins was studied following computational ligand-target docking approach. Molecular docking was carried out using PyRx, AutoDock Vina option based on scoring functions^101,102. The least binding energy (BE, kcal/mol) conformation was considered as the most favourable docking pose. The interactions between ligand and protein were analyzed using PyMOL¹⁰³ and Discovery Studio 3.5 (Accelrys Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

Structural activity relationship analysis

According to their BE, all the ligands were assigned ranking and aligned in ascending order. For the ease of the study, top 250 molecules (268 for M^pro) were subjected to ligand structure similarity analysis (based on canonical SMILES) and BE using Data Warrior software (Version 5.2.1).

Physicochemical properties and bioavailability of PSM

The drug-likeness and the physicochemical properties were studied using SwissADME (www.swissadme.ch). The canonical SMILES of the selected PSM were subjected to SwissADME analysis. The PSM were analyzed for their drug-likeness properties following Lipinski's rule of five¹⁰⁴. The bioavailability radar charts obtained were analyzed for their drug like properties, i.e., lipophilicity (XLOGP3 between − 0.7 and + 5.0), Molecular weight (between 150 and 500 g/mol), Topological polar surface area (between 20 and 130 Å²), Solubility (log S not higher than 6), Flexibility (no more than 9 rotatable bonds) and Saturation (fraction of carbons in the sp³ hybridization not less than 0.25)¹⁰⁵. The bioavailability score (BAS) for selected PSM was also recorded¹⁰⁶.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information 1.^{(12.3KB, docx)}

Supplementary Information 2.^{(210.9KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Information 3.^{(161.3KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Information 4.^{(206.3KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Information 5.^{(39.6KB, docx)}

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the research scholars of Environmental Biotechnology Lab, Centre for Rural Development and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India for their constant support in conducting this work during the period of lockdown. Our special thanks to Head, Centre for Rural Development and Technology, and Director, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India, for providing all facilities needed to conduct this research work.

Author contributions

H.P.: Conceptualized the research work, analyzed structural activity relationship and written manuscript. H.G.G., M.D.O., A.Y., G.C., V.R., B.K., K.S., S.S., P.G., F.A., L.C.: prepared PSM library. H.G.G., M.D.O., A.Y., G.C., V.R.: performed molecular docking studies and analyzed the results. B.K., K.S., S.S., P.G.,. F.A., L.C.: performed bioavailability experiments and analyzed data.

Data availability

The supporting data related to the manuscript is provided as Supplementary Files.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

All authors are contributed equally to this work.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-77602-0.

References

1.Zhu N, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:727–733. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Yin Y, Wunderink RG. MERS, SARS and other coronaviruses as causes of pneumonia. Respirology. 2018;23:130–137. doi: 10.1111/resp.13196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Graham RL, Baric RS. Recombination, reservoirs, and the modular spike: mechanisms of coronavirus cross-species transmission. J. Virol. 2010;84:3134–3146. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01394-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Ksiazek TG, et al. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;348:1953–1966. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Peiris JSM, et al. Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet. 2003;361:1319–1325. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13077-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Hui DS, et al. The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health: the latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan China. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;91:264–266. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Zhou P, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579:270–273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Ceraolo C, Giorgi FM. Genomic variance of the 2019-nCoV coronavirus. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92:522–528. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Pant S, Singh M, Ravichandiran V, Murty USN, Srivastava HK. Peptide-like and small-molecule inhibitors against Covid-19. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020 doi: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1757510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Gautret P, et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomised clinical trial. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Wu F, et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature. 2020;579:265–269. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Pichersky E, Gang DR. Genetics and biochemistry of secondary metabolites in plants: An evolutionary perspective. Trends Plant Sci. 2000;5:439–445. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01741-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Holeski LM, Hillstrom ML, Whitham TG, Lindroth RL. Relative importance of genetic, ontogenetic, induction, and seasonal variation in producing a multivariate defense phenotype in a foundation tree species. Oecologia. 2012;170:695–707. doi: 10.1007/s00442-012-2344-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Xu X, et al. evolution of the novel coronavirus from the ongoing Wuhan outbreak and modeling of its spike protein for risk of human transmission. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020;63:457–460. doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1637-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Khaerunnisa, S., Kurniawan, H., Awaluddin, R., Suhartati, S. & Soetjipto, S. Potential inhibitor of COVID-19 main protease (M^pro) from several medicinal plant compounds by molecular docking study. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202003.0226.v1 (2020).
16.Elfiky AA. Ribavirin, Remdesivir, Sofosbuvir, Galidesivir, and Tenofovir against SARS-CoV-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp): a molecular docking study. Life Sci. 2020;253:117592. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Gui M, et al. Cryo-electron microscopy structures of the SARS-CoV spike glycoprotein reveal a prerequisite conformational state for receptor binding. Cell Res. 2017;27:119–129. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Kong, R. et al. COVID-19 docking server: an interactive server for docking small molecules, peptides and antibodies against potential targets of COVID-19. arXiv Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.00163 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19.Christen P. Les withanolides, steroids vegetaux a structure originale. Pharm. Acta Helv. 1986;61:242–246. [Google Scholar]
20.Glotter E. Withanolides and related ergostane-type steroids. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1991;8:415–440. doi: 10.1039/np9910800415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Mirjalili MH, Moyano E, Bonfill M, Cusido RM, Palazón J. Steroidal lactones from Withania somnifera, an ancient plant for novel medicine. Molecules. 2009;14:2373–2393. doi: 10.3390/molecules14072373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Vincken JP, Heng L, de Groot A, Gruppen H. Saponins, classification and occurrence in the plant kingdom. Phytochemistry. 2007;68:275–297. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.He Y, et al. Recent advances in biotransformation of saponins. Molecules. 2019;24:2365. doi: 10.3390/molecules24132365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Gao S, Basu S, Yang Z, Deb A, Hu M. Bioavailability challenges associated with development of saponins as therapeutic and chemopreventive agents. Curr. Drug Targets. 2012;13:1885–1899. doi: 10.2174/138945012804545498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25.Ramasamy S, et al. In silico and in vitro analysis of bacoside a aglycones and its derivatives as the constituents responsible for the cognitive effects of Bacopa monnieri. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0126565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Del Hierro JN, Herrera T, Fornari T, Reglero G, Martin D. The gastrointestinal behavior of saponins and its significance for their bioavailability and bioactivities. J. Funct. Foods. 2018;40:484–497. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2017.11.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
27.Varshney IP, Jain DC, Srivastava HC. Saponins from Trigonella foenum-graecum leaves. J. Nat. Prod. 1984;47:44–46. doi: 10.1021/np50031a002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
28.Husson, H. P. Simple indole alkaloids including β-carbolines and carbazoles. In The Alkaloids: Chemistry and Pharmacology,Vol 26, 1–51 (Academic Press, 1985). 10.1016/S0099-9598(08)60192-3.
29.Chakraborty DP, Roy S. Carbazole alkaloids III. Fortschr. Chem. Org. Naturst. 1991;57:71–152. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-9119-4_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Chakraborty, D. P. Chemistry and biology of carbazole alkaloids. In The Alkaloids: Chemistry and Pharmacology, Vol 44, 257–364 (Academic Press, 1993). 10.1016/S0099-9598(08)60146-7.
31.Knölker HJ, Reddy KR. Biological and pharmacological activities of carbazole alkaloids. Alkaloids Chem. Biol. 2008;65:181–193. doi: 10.1016/S1099-4831(07)00004-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Nalli Y, et al. Four new carbazole alkaloids from Murraya koenigii that display anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial activities. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016;14:3322–3332. doi: 10.1039/C6OB00267F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.Yu L, Sun Y, Su J, Li X. Bismahanine exerts anti-cancer effects on human cervical cancer cells by inhibition of growth, migration and invasion via suppression of NF-kB signalling pathway. J. BUON. 2020;25:93–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Wright, C. R. A. & Luff, A. P. XLVI.—The alkaloïds of the veratrums: part II—the alkaloïds of Veratrum album. J. Chem. Soc. Trans.35, 405–420. 10.1039/CT8793500405 (1879).
35.Baba S, et al. In vivo comparison of the bioavailability of (+)-catechin, (−)-epicatechin and their mixture in orally administered rats. J. Nutr. 2001;131:2885–2891. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.11.2885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.Serra A, et al. Bioavailability of procyanidin dimers and trimers and matrix food effects in in vitro and in vivo models. Br. J. Nutr. 2010;103:944–952. doi: 10.1017/S0007114509992741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Furusawa M, et al. Novel, complex flavonoids from Mallotus philippensis (Kamala tree) Helv. Chim. Acta. 2005;88:1048–1058. doi: 10.1002/hlca.200590076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
38.Hoffmann M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181:271–280. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39.Monagas M, et al. Insights into the metabolism and microbial biotransformation of dietary flavan-3-ols and the bioactivity of their metabolites. Food Funct. 2010;1:233–253. doi: 10.1039/c0fo00132e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Kumar S, Pandey AK. Chemistry and biological activities of flavonoids: an overview. Sci. World J. 2013;2013:162750. doi: 10.1155/2013/162750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.Pompei R, Flore O, Marccialis MA, Pani A, Loddo B. Glycyrrhizic acid inhibits virus growth and inactivates virus particles. Nature. 1979;281:689–690. doi: 10.1038/281689a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Størmer FC, Reistad R, Alexander J. Glycyrrhizic acid in liquorice–evaluation of health hazard. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1993;31:303–312. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(93)90080-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Takeda S, et al. Bioavailability study of glycyrrhetic acid after oral administration of glycyrrhizin in rats; relevance to the intestinal bacterial hydrolysis. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1996;48:902–905. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1996.tb05998.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Akinwumi BC, Bordun KM, Anderson HD. Biological activities of stilbenoids. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:792. doi: 10.3390/ijms19030792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45.Walle T. Bioavailability of resveratrol. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011;1215:9–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05842.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46.Sugie S, et al. Inhibitory effects of plumbagin and juglone on azoxymethane-induced intestinal carcinogenesis in rats. Cancer Lett. 1998;127:177–183. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3835(98)00035-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47.Hazra B, et al. Synthesis of plumbagin derivatives and their inhibitory activities against Ehrlich ascites carcinoma in vivo and Leishmania donovani Promastigotes in vitro. Phytother. Res. 2002;16:133–137. doi: 10.1002/ptr.867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48.De Maria, C. A. B., Trugo, L. C. & De Mariz e Miranda, L. S. The content of individual caffeoylquinic acids in edible vegetables. J. Food Compos. Anal.12, 289–292. 10.1006/jfca.1999.0833 (1999).
49.Federspiel M, et al. Industrial synthesis of the key precursor in the synthesis of the anti-Influenza drug Oseltamivir phosphate (Ro 64–0796/002, GS-4104-02): Ethyl (3R,4S,5S)-4,5-epoxy-3-(1-ethyl-propoxy)-cyclohex-1-ene-1-carboxylate. Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 1999;3:266–274. doi: 10.1021/op9900176. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
50.McDougall B, et al. Dicaffeoylquinic and dicaffeoyltartaric acids are selective inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998;42:140–146. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.1.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51.Ikeda K, et al. Inhibition of multiplication of herpes simplex virus by caffeic acid. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2011;28:595–598. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2011.739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52.Kamng'ona A, Moore JP, Lindsey G, Brandt W. Inhibition of HIV-1 and M-MLV reverse transcriptases by a major polyphenol (3,4,5 tri-O-galloylquinic acid) present in the leaves of the South African resurrection plant, Myrothamnus flabellifolia. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2011;26:843–853. doi: 10.3109/14756366.2011.566220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53.Zanello PR, et al. Quinic acid derivatives inhibit dengue virus replication in vitro. Virol. J. 2015;12:223. doi: 10.1186/s12985-015-0443-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54.Gonthier MP, Verny MA, Besson C, Rémésy C, Scalbert A. Chlorogenic acid bioavailability largely depends on its metabolism by the gut microflora in rats. J. Nutr. 2003;133:1853–1859. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.6.1853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55.Gil MI, Tomás-Barberán FA, Hess-Pierce B, Holcroft DM, Kader AA. Anti-oxidant activity of pomegranate juice and its relationship with phenolic composition and processing. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000;48:4581–4589. doi: 10.1021/jf000404a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56.Seeram, N. P., Lee, R. & Heber, D. Bioavailability of ellagic acid in human plasma after consumption of ellagitannins from pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) juice. Clin. Chim. Acta348, 63–68. 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.04.029 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed]
57.Heber, D. Pomegranate ellagitannins. In Herbal Medicine: Biomolecular and Clinical Aspects (eds. Benzie, I. F. F. & Wachtel-Galor, S.) (CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis, 2011). [PubMed]
58.Seeram NP, et al. Pomegranate juice and extracts provide similar levels of plasma and urinary ellagitannin metabolites in human subjects. J. Med. Food. 2008;11:390–394. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2007.650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59.Krichel B, Falke S, Hilgenfeld R, Redecke L, Uetrecht C. Processing of the SARS-CoV pp1a/ab nsp7-10 region. Biochem. J. 2020;477:1009–1019. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20200029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60.Kubin A, Wierrani F, Burner U, Alth G, Grünberger W. Hypericin–the facts about a controversial agent. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2005;11:233–253. doi: 10.2174/1381612053382287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61.Agostinis P, Vantieghem A, Merlevede W, de Witte PAM. Hypericin in cancer treatment: more light on the way. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2002;34:221–241. doi: 10.1016/S1357-2725(01)00126-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62.Smith, M. & Smith, J. C. Repurposing therapeutics for COVID-19: Supercomputer-based docking to the SARS-CoV-2 viral spike protein and viral spike protein-human ACE2 interface. ChemRxiv .10.26434/chemrxiv.11871402.v4 (2020).
63.Chen H, et al. Anti-viral activity against infectious bronchitis virus and bioactive components of Hypericum perforatum L. Front. Pharmacol. 2019;10:1272. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64.Shih CM, Wu CH, Wu WJ, Hsiao YM, Ko JL. Hypericin inhibits hepatitis C virus replication via deacetylation and down-regulation of heme oxygenase-1. Phytomedicine. 2018;46:193–198. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2017.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65.Kim DE, et al. Natural bis-benzylisoquinoline alkaloids-tetrandrine, fangchinoline, and cepharanthine, inhibit human coronavirus OC43 infection of MRC-5 human lung cells. Biomolecules. 2019;9:696. doi: 10.3390/biom9110696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66.Coulerie P, et al. Structure-activity relationship study of biflavonoids on the Dengue virus polymerase DENV-NS5 RdRp. Planta Med. 2013;79:1313–1318. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67.Graefe EU, et al. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of quercetin glycosides in humans. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2001;41:492–499. doi: 10.1177/00912700122010366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68.Holt RR, et al. Procyanidin dimer B2 [epicatechin-(4β-8)-epicatechin] in human plasma after the consumption of a flavanol-rich cocoa. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002;76:798–804. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/76.4.798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69.Urpi-Sarda M, et al. Epicatechin, procyanidins, and phenolic microbial metabolites after cocoa intake in humans and rats. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009;394:1545–1556. doi: 10.1007/s00216-009-2676-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
70.Czank C, et al. Human metabolism and elimination of the anthocyanin, cyanidin-3-glucoside: A (13)C-tracer study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013;97:995–1003. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.049247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71.Kim, T. G. et al. Anti-viral activities of extracts isolated from Terminalis chebula Retz., Sanguisorba officinalis L., Rubus coreanus Miq. and Rheum palmatum L. against hepatitis B virus. Phytother. Res.15, 718–720. 10.1002/ptr.832 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed]
72.Peng S, Scalbert A, Monties B. Insoluble ellagitannins in Castanea sativa and Quercus petraea woods. Phytochemistry. 1991;30:775–778. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(91)85250-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
73.Tanaka, T. et al. C-Glycosidic ellagitannin metabolites in the heartwood of Japanese chestnut tree (Castanea crenate SIEB. et ZUCC.). Chem. Pharm. Bull.44, 2236–2242. 10.1248/cpb.44.2236 (1996).
74.Vivas, N., Laguerre, M., Pianet de Boissel, I., Vivas de Gaulejac, N. & Nonier, M. F. Conformational interpretation of Vescalagin and Castalagin physicochemical properties. J. Agric. Food Chem.52, 2073–2078. 10.1021/jf030460m (2004). [DOI] [PubMed]
75.Vilhelmova N, Jacquet R, Quideau S, Stoyanova A, Galabov AS. Three-dimensional analysis of combination effect of ellagitannins and acyclovir on herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2. Anti-viral Res. 2011;89:174–181. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2010.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
76.Li J, Yang X, Huang L. Anti-Influenza virus activity and constituents characterisation of Paeonia delavayi extracts. Molecules. 2016;21:1133. doi: 10.3390/molecules21091133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
77.Takeda S, et al. In-vivo assessment of extrahepatic metabolism of paeoniflorin in rats: Relevance to intestinal floral metabolism. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1997;49:35–39. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1997.tb06748.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
78.Liu ZQ, Jiang ZH, Liu L, Hu M. Mechanisms responsible for poor oral bioavailability of paeoniflorin: Role of intestinal disposition and interactions with sinomenine. Pharm. Res. 2006;23:2768–2780. doi: 10.1007/s11095-006-9100-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
79.Charlton JL. Antiviral activity of lignans. J. Nat. Prod. 1998;61:1447–1451. doi: 10.1021/np980136z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
80.Chen YG, et al. Lignans from Schisandra hernyi with DNA cleaving activity and cytotoxic effect on leukemia and Hela cells in vitro. Fitoterapia. 2005;76:370–373. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2005.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
81.Subissi L, et al. One severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus protein complex integrates processive RNA polymerase and exonuclease activities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:E3900–E3909. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323705111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
82.Gao Y, et al. Structure of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from COVID-19 virus. Science. 2020 doi: 10.1126/science.abb7498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
83.Miyake, Y., Yamamoto, K. & Osawa, T. Isolation of eriocitrin (eriodictyol 7-rutinoside) from lemon fruit (Citrus limon BURM. f.) and its antioxidative activity. Food Sci. Technol. Int. Tokyo3, 84–89. 10.3136/fsti9596t9798.3.84 (1997).
84.Barbosa, W. L. R., Peres, A., Gallori, S. & Vincieri, F. F. Determination of myricetin derivatives in Chrysobalanus icaco L. (Chrysobalanaceae). Rev. Bras. Farmacogn.16, 333–337. 10.1590/S0102-695X2006000300009 (2006).
85.Hattori S, Matsuda H. Rhoifolin, a new flavone glycoside, isolated from the leaves of Rhus succedanea. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1952;37:85–89. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(52)90164-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
86.Refaat, J., Desoukey, S. Y., Ramadan, M. A. & Kamel, M. S. Rhoifolin: A review of sources and biological activities. Int. J. Pharmacogn.2, 102–109. 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.IJP.2(3).102-09 (2015).
87.Akai E, Takeda T, Furubayashi Y, Hagiwara Y. Sulfated triterpenoid saponins from the leaves of Bupleurum rotundifolium L. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1985;33:3715–3723. doi: 10.1248/cpb.33.3715. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
88.Navarro P, et al. In vivo anti-inflammatory activity of saponins from Bupleurum rotundifolium. Life Sci. 2001;68:1199–1206. doi: 10.1016/S0024-3205(00)01019-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
89.Fujioka, T. et al. Antiproliferative constituents from Umbelliferae plants VI. New ursane-type saikosaponin analogs from the fruits of Bupleurum rotundifolium. Chem. Pharm. Bull.51, 365–372. 10.1248/cpb.51.365 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed]
90.Rao KV. Toxic principles of Hippomane mancinella. Planta Med. 1974;25:166–171. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1097927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
91.Boucaud-Maitre D, et al. Severity of manchineel fruit (Hippomane mancinella) poisoning: a retrospective case series of 97 patients from French Poison Control Centers. Toxicon. 2019;161:28–32. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2019.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
92.Zheng S, et al. Synthesis and biological profiling of tellimagrandin I and analogues reveals that the medium ring can significantly modulate biological activity. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012;10:2590–2593. doi: 10.1039/c2ob25065a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
93.Lan J, et al. Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2180-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
94.Walls AC, et al. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell. 2020;181:281–292. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
95.Biasini M, et al. SWISS-MODEL: Modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:W252–W258. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
96.Pettersen EF, et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualisation system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004;25:1605–1612. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
97.Meng, T. et al. The transmembrane serine protease inhibitors are potential anti-viral drugs for 2019-nCoV targeting the insertion sequence-induced viral infectivity. bioRxiv.10.1101/2020.02.08.926006 (2020).
98.Jin Z, et al. Structure of Mpro from COVID-19 virus and discovery of its inhibitors. Nature. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2223-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
99.Li, Z. et al. FEP-based screening prompts drug repositioning against COVID-19. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2020.03.23.004580 (2020).
100.Rappe AK, Casewit CJ, Colwell KS, Goddard WA, III, Skiff WM. UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992;114:10024–10035. doi: 10.1021/ja00051a040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
101.Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimisation, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 2010;31:455–461. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
102.Dallakyan S, Olson AJ. Small-molecule library screening by docking with PyRx. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015;1263:243–250. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2269-7_19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
103.DeLano, W. L. PyMOL: An open-source molecular graphics tool. In CCP4 Newsletter on Protein Crystallography Vol 40, 82–92 (2002).
104.Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001;46:3–26. doi: 10.1016/S0169-409X(00)00129-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
105.Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V. SwissADME: A free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:42717. doi: 10.1038/srep42717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
106.Martin YC. A bioavailability score. J. Med. Chem. 2005;48:3164–3170. doi: 10.1021/jm0492002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information 1.^{(12.3KB, docx)}

Supplementary Information 2.^{(210.9KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Information 3.^{(161.3KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Information 4.^{(206.3KB, xlsx)}

Supplementary Information 5.^{(39.6KB, docx)}

Data Availability Statement

The supporting data related to the manuscript is provided as Supplementary Files.

[CR1] 1.Zhu N, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:727–733. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR2] 2.Yin Y, Wunderink RG. MERS, SARS and other coronaviruses as causes of pneumonia. Respirology. 2018;23:130–137. doi: 10.1111/resp.13196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR3] 3.Graham RL, Baric RS. Recombination, reservoirs, and the modular spike: mechanisms of coronavirus cross-species transmission. J. Virol. 2010;84:3134–3146. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01394-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR4] 4.Ksiazek TG, et al. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;348:1953–1966. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR5] 5.Peiris JSM, et al. Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet. 2003;361:1319–1325. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13077-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR6] 6.Hui DS, et al. The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health: the latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan China. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;91:264–266. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR7] 7.Zhou P, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579:270–273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR8] 8.Ceraolo C, Giorgi FM. Genomic variance of the 2019-nCoV coronavirus. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92:522–528. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR9] 9.Pant S, Singh M, Ravichandiran V, Murty USN, Srivastava HK. Peptide-like and small-molecule inhibitors against Covid-19. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020 doi: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1757510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR10] 10.Gautret P, et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomised clinical trial. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR11] 11.Wu F, et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature. 2020;579:265–269. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR12] 12.Pichersky E, Gang DR. Genetics and biochemistry of secondary metabolites in plants: An evolutionary perspective. Trends Plant Sci. 2000;5:439–445. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01741-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR13] 13.Holeski LM, Hillstrom ML, Whitham TG, Lindroth RL. Relative importance of genetic, ontogenetic, induction, and seasonal variation in producing a multivariate defense phenotype in a foundation tree species. Oecologia. 2012;170:695–707. doi: 10.1007/s00442-012-2344-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR14] 14.Xu X, et al. evolution of the novel coronavirus from the ongoing Wuhan outbreak and modeling of its spike protein for risk of human transmission. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020;63:457–460. doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1637-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR15] 15.Khaerunnisa, S., Kurniawan, H., Awaluddin, R., Suhartati, S. & Soetjipto, S. Potential inhibitor of COVID-19 main protease (M^pro) from several medicinal plant compounds by molecular docking study. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202003.0226.v1 (2020).

[CR16] 16.Elfiky AA. Ribavirin, Remdesivir, Sofosbuvir, Galidesivir, and Tenofovir against SARS-CoV-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp): a molecular docking study. Life Sci. 2020;253:117592. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR17] 17.Gui M, et al. Cryo-electron microscopy structures of the SARS-CoV spike glycoprotein reveal a prerequisite conformational state for receptor binding. Cell Res. 2017;27:119–129. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR18] 18.Kong, R. et al. COVID-19 docking server: an interactive server for docking small molecules, peptides and antibodies against potential targets of COVID-19. arXiv Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.00163 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[CR19] 19.Christen P. Les withanolides, steroids vegetaux a structure originale. Pharm. Acta Helv. 1986;61:242–246. [Google Scholar]

[CR20] 20.Glotter E. Withanolides and related ergostane-type steroids. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1991;8:415–440. doi: 10.1039/np9910800415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR21] 21.Mirjalili MH, Moyano E, Bonfill M, Cusido RM, Palazón J. Steroidal lactones from Withania somnifera, an ancient plant for novel medicine. Molecules. 2009;14:2373–2393. doi: 10.3390/molecules14072373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR22] 22.Vincken JP, Heng L, de Groot A, Gruppen H. Saponins, classification and occurrence in the plant kingdom. Phytochemistry. 2007;68:275–297. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR23] 23.He Y, et al. Recent advances in biotransformation of saponins. Molecules. 2019;24:2365. doi: 10.3390/molecules24132365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR24] 24.Gao S, Basu S, Yang Z, Deb A, Hu M. Bioavailability challenges associated with development of saponins as therapeutic and chemopreventive agents. Curr. Drug Targets. 2012;13:1885–1899. doi: 10.2174/138945012804545498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR25] 25.Ramasamy S, et al. In silico and in vitro analysis of bacoside a aglycones and its derivatives as the constituents responsible for the cognitive effects of Bacopa monnieri. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0126565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR26] 26.Del Hierro JN, Herrera T, Fornari T, Reglero G, Martin D. The gastrointestinal behavior of saponins and its significance for their bioavailability and bioactivities. J. Funct. Foods. 2018;40:484–497. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2017.11.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR27] 27.Varshney IP, Jain DC, Srivastava HC. Saponins from Trigonella foenum-graecum leaves. J. Nat. Prod. 1984;47:44–46. doi: 10.1021/np50031a002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR28] 28.Husson, H. P. Simple indole alkaloids including β-carbolines and carbazoles. In The Alkaloids: Chemistry and Pharmacology,Vol 26, 1–51 (Academic Press, 1985). 10.1016/S0099-9598(08)60192-3.

[CR29] 29.Chakraborty DP, Roy S. Carbazole alkaloids III. Fortschr. Chem. Org. Naturst. 1991;57:71–152. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-9119-4_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR30] 30.Chakraborty, D. P. Chemistry and biology of carbazole alkaloids. In The Alkaloids: Chemistry and Pharmacology, Vol 44, 257–364 (Academic Press, 1993). 10.1016/S0099-9598(08)60146-7.

[CR31] 31.Knölker HJ, Reddy KR. Biological and pharmacological activities of carbazole alkaloids. Alkaloids Chem. Biol. 2008;65:181–193. doi: 10.1016/S1099-4831(07)00004-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR32] 32.Nalli Y, et al. Four new carbazole alkaloids from Murraya koenigii that display anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial activities. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016;14:3322–3332. doi: 10.1039/C6OB00267F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR33] 33.Yu L, Sun Y, Su J, Li X. Bismahanine exerts anti-cancer effects on human cervical cancer cells by inhibition of growth, migration and invasion via suppression of NF-kB signalling pathway. J. BUON. 2020;25:93–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR34] 34.Wright, C. R. A. & Luff, A. P. XLVI.—The alkaloïds of the veratrums: part II—the alkaloïds of Veratrum album. J. Chem. Soc. Trans.35, 405–420. 10.1039/CT8793500405 (1879).

[CR35] 35.Baba S, et al. In vivo comparison of the bioavailability of (+)-catechin, (−)-epicatechin and their mixture in orally administered rats. J. Nutr. 2001;131:2885–2891. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.11.2885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR36] 36.Serra A, et al. Bioavailability of procyanidin dimers and trimers and matrix food effects in in vitro and in vivo models. Br. J. Nutr. 2010;103:944–952. doi: 10.1017/S0007114509992741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR37] 37.Furusawa M, et al. Novel, complex flavonoids from Mallotus philippensis (Kamala tree) Helv. Chim. Acta. 2005;88:1048–1058. doi: 10.1002/hlca.200590076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR38] 38.Hoffmann M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181:271–280. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR39] 39.Monagas M, et al. Insights into the metabolism and microbial biotransformation of dietary flavan-3-ols and the bioactivity of their metabolites. Food Funct. 2010;1:233–253. doi: 10.1039/c0fo00132e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR40] 40.Kumar S, Pandey AK. Chemistry and biological activities of flavonoids: an overview. Sci. World J. 2013;2013:162750. doi: 10.1155/2013/162750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR41] 41.Pompei R, Flore O, Marccialis MA, Pani A, Loddo B. Glycyrrhizic acid inhibits virus growth and inactivates virus particles. Nature. 1979;281:689–690. doi: 10.1038/281689a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR42] 42.Størmer FC, Reistad R, Alexander J. Glycyrrhizic acid in liquorice–evaluation of health hazard. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1993;31:303–312. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(93)90080-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR43] 43.Takeda S, et al. Bioavailability study of glycyrrhetic acid after oral administration of glycyrrhizin in rats; relevance to the intestinal bacterial hydrolysis. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1996;48:902–905. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1996.tb05998.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR44] 44.Akinwumi BC, Bordun KM, Anderson HD. Biological activities of stilbenoids. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:792. doi: 10.3390/ijms19030792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR45] 45.Walle T. Bioavailability of resveratrol. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011;1215:9–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05842.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR46] 46.Sugie S, et al. Inhibitory effects of plumbagin and juglone on azoxymethane-induced intestinal carcinogenesis in rats. Cancer Lett. 1998;127:177–183. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3835(98)00035-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR47] 47.Hazra B, et al. Synthesis of plumbagin derivatives and their inhibitory activities against Ehrlich ascites carcinoma in vivo and Leishmania donovani Promastigotes in vitro. Phytother. Res. 2002;16:133–137. doi: 10.1002/ptr.867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR48] 48.De Maria, C. A. B., Trugo, L. C. & De Mariz e Miranda, L. S. The content of individual caffeoylquinic acids in edible vegetables. J. Food Compos. Anal.12, 289–292. 10.1006/jfca.1999.0833 (1999).

[CR49] 49.Federspiel M, et al. Industrial synthesis of the key precursor in the synthesis of the anti-Influenza drug Oseltamivir phosphate (Ro 64–0796/002, GS-4104-02): Ethyl (3R,4S,5S)-4,5-epoxy-3-(1-ethyl-propoxy)-cyclohex-1-ene-1-carboxylate. Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 1999;3:266–274. doi: 10.1021/op9900176. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR50] 50.McDougall B, et al. Dicaffeoylquinic and dicaffeoyltartaric acids are selective inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998;42:140–146. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.1.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR51] 51.Ikeda K, et al. Inhibition of multiplication of herpes simplex virus by caffeic acid. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2011;28:595–598. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2011.739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR52] 52.Kamng'ona A, Moore JP, Lindsey G, Brandt W. Inhibition of HIV-1 and M-MLV reverse transcriptases by a major polyphenol (3,4,5 tri-O-galloylquinic acid) present in the leaves of the South African resurrection plant, Myrothamnus flabellifolia. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2011;26:843–853. doi: 10.3109/14756366.2011.566220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR53] 53.Zanello PR, et al. Quinic acid derivatives inhibit dengue virus replication in vitro. Virol. J. 2015;12:223. doi: 10.1186/s12985-015-0443-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR54] 54.Gonthier MP, Verny MA, Besson C, Rémésy C, Scalbert A. Chlorogenic acid bioavailability largely depends on its metabolism by the gut microflora in rats. J. Nutr. 2003;133:1853–1859. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.6.1853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR55] 55.Gil MI, Tomás-Barberán FA, Hess-Pierce B, Holcroft DM, Kader AA. Anti-oxidant activity of pomegranate juice and its relationship with phenolic composition and processing. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000;48:4581–4589. doi: 10.1021/jf000404a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR56] 56.Seeram, N. P., Lee, R. & Heber, D. Bioavailability of ellagic acid in human plasma after consumption of ellagitannins from pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) juice. Clin. Chim. Acta348, 63–68. 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.04.029 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed]

[CR57] 57.Heber, D. Pomegranate ellagitannins. In Herbal Medicine: Biomolecular and Clinical Aspects (eds. Benzie, I. F. F. & Wachtel-Galor, S.) (CRC Press/ Taylor & Francis, 2011). [PubMed]

[CR58] 58.Seeram NP, et al. Pomegranate juice and extracts provide similar levels of plasma and urinary ellagitannin metabolites in human subjects. J. Med. Food. 2008;11:390–394. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2007.650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR59] 59.Krichel B, Falke S, Hilgenfeld R, Redecke L, Uetrecht C. Processing of the SARS-CoV pp1a/ab nsp7-10 region. Biochem. J. 2020;477:1009–1019. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20200029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR60] 60.Kubin A, Wierrani F, Burner U, Alth G, Grünberger W. Hypericin–the facts about a controversial agent. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2005;11:233–253. doi: 10.2174/1381612053382287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR61] 61.Agostinis P, Vantieghem A, Merlevede W, de Witte PAM. Hypericin in cancer treatment: more light on the way. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2002;34:221–241. doi: 10.1016/S1357-2725(01)00126-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR62] 62.Smith, M. & Smith, J. C. Repurposing therapeutics for COVID-19: Supercomputer-based docking to the SARS-CoV-2 viral spike protein and viral spike protein-human ACE2 interface. ChemRxiv .10.26434/chemrxiv.11871402.v4 (2020).

[CR63] 63.Chen H, et al. Anti-viral activity against infectious bronchitis virus and bioactive components of Hypericum perforatum L. Front. Pharmacol. 2019;10:1272. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR64] 64.Shih CM, Wu CH, Wu WJ, Hsiao YM, Ko JL. Hypericin inhibits hepatitis C virus replication via deacetylation and down-regulation of heme oxygenase-1. Phytomedicine. 2018;46:193–198. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2017.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR65] 65.Kim DE, et al. Natural bis-benzylisoquinoline alkaloids-tetrandrine, fangchinoline, and cepharanthine, inhibit human coronavirus OC43 infection of MRC-5 human lung cells. Biomolecules. 2019;9:696. doi: 10.3390/biom9110696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR66] 66.Coulerie P, et al. Structure-activity relationship study of biflavonoids on the Dengue virus polymerase DENV-NS5 RdRp. Planta Med. 2013;79:1313–1318. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR67] 67.Graefe EU, et al. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of quercetin glycosides in humans. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2001;41:492–499. doi: 10.1177/00912700122010366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR68] 68.Holt RR, et al. Procyanidin dimer B2 [epicatechin-(4β-8)-epicatechin] in human plasma after the consumption of a flavanol-rich cocoa. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002;76:798–804. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/76.4.798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR69] 69.Urpi-Sarda M, et al. Epicatechin, procyanidins, and phenolic microbial metabolites after cocoa intake in humans and rats. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009;394:1545–1556. doi: 10.1007/s00216-009-2676-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR70] 70.Czank C, et al. Human metabolism and elimination of the anthocyanin, cyanidin-3-glucoside: A (13)C-tracer study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013;97:995–1003. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.049247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR71] 71.Kim, T. G. et al. Anti-viral activities of extracts isolated from Terminalis chebula Retz., Sanguisorba officinalis L., Rubus coreanus Miq. and Rheum palmatum L. against hepatitis B virus. Phytother. Res.15, 718–720. 10.1002/ptr.832 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed]

[CR72] 72.Peng S, Scalbert A, Monties B. Insoluble ellagitannins in Castanea sativa and Quercus petraea woods. Phytochemistry. 1991;30:775–778. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(91)85250-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR73] 73.Tanaka, T. et al. C-Glycosidic ellagitannin metabolites in the heartwood of Japanese chestnut tree (Castanea crenate SIEB. et ZUCC.). Chem. Pharm. Bull.44, 2236–2242. 10.1248/cpb.44.2236 (1996).

[CR74] 74.Vivas, N., Laguerre, M., Pianet de Boissel, I., Vivas de Gaulejac, N. & Nonier, M. F. Conformational interpretation of Vescalagin and Castalagin physicochemical properties. J. Agric. Food Chem.52, 2073–2078. 10.1021/jf030460m (2004). [DOI] [PubMed]

[CR75] 75.Vilhelmova N, Jacquet R, Quideau S, Stoyanova A, Galabov AS. Three-dimensional analysis of combination effect of ellagitannins and acyclovir on herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2. Anti-viral Res. 2011;89:174–181. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2010.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR76] 76.Li J, Yang X, Huang L. Anti-Influenza virus activity and constituents characterisation of Paeonia delavayi extracts. Molecules. 2016;21:1133. doi: 10.3390/molecules21091133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR77] 77.Takeda S, et al. In-vivo assessment of extrahepatic metabolism of paeoniflorin in rats: Relevance to intestinal floral metabolism. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1997;49:35–39. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1997.tb06748.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR78] 78.Liu ZQ, Jiang ZH, Liu L, Hu M. Mechanisms responsible for poor oral bioavailability of paeoniflorin: Role of intestinal disposition and interactions with sinomenine. Pharm. Res. 2006;23:2768–2780. doi: 10.1007/s11095-006-9100-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR79] 79.Charlton JL. Antiviral activity of lignans. J. Nat. Prod. 1998;61:1447–1451. doi: 10.1021/np980136z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR80] 80.Chen YG, et al. Lignans from Schisandra hernyi with DNA cleaving activity and cytotoxic effect on leukemia and Hela cells in vitro. Fitoterapia. 2005;76:370–373. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2005.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR81] 81.Subissi L, et al. One severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus protein complex integrates processive RNA polymerase and exonuclease activities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:E3900–E3909. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323705111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR82] 82.Gao Y, et al. Structure of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from COVID-19 virus. Science. 2020 doi: 10.1126/science.abb7498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR83] 83.Miyake, Y., Yamamoto, K. & Osawa, T. Isolation of eriocitrin (eriodictyol 7-rutinoside) from lemon fruit (Citrus limon BURM. f.) and its antioxidative activity. Food Sci. Technol. Int. Tokyo3, 84–89. 10.3136/fsti9596t9798.3.84 (1997).

[CR84] 84.Barbosa, W. L. R., Peres, A., Gallori, S. & Vincieri, F. F. Determination of myricetin derivatives in Chrysobalanus icaco L. (Chrysobalanaceae). Rev. Bras. Farmacogn.16, 333–337. 10.1590/S0102-695X2006000300009 (2006).

[CR85] 85.Hattori S, Matsuda H. Rhoifolin, a new flavone glycoside, isolated from the leaves of Rhus succedanea. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1952;37:85–89. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(52)90164-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR86] 86.Refaat, J., Desoukey, S. Y., Ramadan, M. A. & Kamel, M. S. Rhoifolin: A review of sources and biological activities. Int. J. Pharmacogn.2, 102–109. 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.IJP.2(3).102-09 (2015).

[CR87] 87.Akai E, Takeda T, Furubayashi Y, Hagiwara Y. Sulfated triterpenoid saponins from the leaves of Bupleurum rotundifolium L. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1985;33:3715–3723. doi: 10.1248/cpb.33.3715. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR88] 88.Navarro P, et al. In vivo anti-inflammatory activity of saponins from Bupleurum rotundifolium. Life Sci. 2001;68:1199–1206. doi: 10.1016/S0024-3205(00)01019-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR89] 89.Fujioka, T. et al. Antiproliferative constituents from Umbelliferae plants VI. New ursane-type saikosaponin analogs from the fruits of Bupleurum rotundifolium. Chem. Pharm. Bull.51, 365–372. 10.1248/cpb.51.365 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed]

[CR90] 90.Rao KV. Toxic principles of Hippomane mancinella. Planta Med. 1974;25:166–171. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1097927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR91] 91.Boucaud-Maitre D, et al. Severity of manchineel fruit (Hippomane mancinella) poisoning: a retrospective case series of 97 patients from French Poison Control Centers. Toxicon. 2019;161:28–32. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2019.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR92] 92.Zheng S, et al. Synthesis and biological profiling of tellimagrandin I and analogues reveals that the medium ring can significantly modulate biological activity. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012;10:2590–2593. doi: 10.1039/c2ob25065a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR93] 93.Lan J, et al. Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2180-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR94] 94.Walls AC, et al. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell. 2020;181:281–292. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR95] 95.Biasini M, et al. SWISS-MODEL: Modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:W252–W258. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR96] 96.Pettersen EF, et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualisation system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004;25:1605–1612. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR97] 97.Meng, T. et al. The transmembrane serine protease inhibitors are potential anti-viral drugs for 2019-nCoV targeting the insertion sequence-induced viral infectivity. bioRxiv.10.1101/2020.02.08.926006 (2020).

[CR98] 98.Jin Z, et al. Structure of Mpro from COVID-19 virus and discovery of its inhibitors. Nature. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2223-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR99] 99.Li, Z. et al. FEP-based screening prompts drug repositioning against COVID-19. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2020.03.23.004580 (2020).

[CR100] 100.Rappe AK, Casewit CJ, Colwell KS, Goddard WA, III, Skiff WM. UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992;114:10024–10035. doi: 10.1021/ja00051a040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR101] 101.Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimisation, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 2010;31:455–461. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR102] 102.Dallakyan S, Olson AJ. Small-molecule library screening by docking with PyRx. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015;1263:243–250. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2269-7_19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR103] 103.DeLano, W. L. PyMOL: An open-source molecular graphics tool. In CCP4 Newsletter on Protein Crystallography Vol 40, 82–92 (2002).

[CR104] 104.Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001;46:3–26. doi: 10.1016/S0169-409X(00)00129-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR105] 105.Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V. SwissADME: A free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:42717. doi: 10.1038/srep42717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR106] 106.Martin YC. A bioavailability score. J. Med. Chem. 2005;48:3164–3170. doi: 10.1021/jm0492002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

In silico studies evidenced the role of structurally diverse plant secondary metabolites in reducing SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis

Hariprasad Puttaswamy

Hittanahallikoppal Gajendramurthy Gowtham

Monu Dinesh Ojha

Ajay Yadav

Gourav Choudhir

Vasantharaja Raguraman

Bhani Kongkham

Koushalya Selvaraju

Shazia Shareef

Priyanka Gehlot

Faiz Ahamed

Leena Chauhan

Abstract

Introduction

Results and discussion

Table 1.

SARS-CoV-2 spike protein

Figure 1.

Human transmembrane serine protease (TMPRSS2)

Figure 2.

SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease (Mpro)

Figure 3.

SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp)

Figure 4.

Conclusion

Materials and methods

Preparation of plant secondary metabolites library

Target proteins

Molecular docking

Structural activity relationship analysis

Physicochemical properties and bioavailability of PSM

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

Author contributions

Data availability

Competing interests

Footnotes

Supplementary information

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases

SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease (M^pro)