Abstract
We have previously identified a shift from TNF-α-induced apoptosis to necroptosis that occurs under hyperglycemic conditions. This shift involves the downregulation or silencing of caspases and concurrent upregulation of necroptotic proteins leading to activation of the necrosome. In addition, under hyperglycemic conditions in vivo, this shift in cell death mechanisms exacerbates neonatal hypoxia-ischemia (HI) brain injury. Here, we identify two major factors that drive the hyperglycemic shift to necroptosis: (1) reactive oxygen species (ROS) and (2) receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIP1). ROS, including mitochondrial superoxide, led to the oxidation of RIP1, as well as formation and activation of the necrosome. Concurrently, ROS mediate a decrease in the levels and activation of executioner caspases-3, -6, and -7. Importantly, hyperglycemia and mitochondrial ROS result in the oxidation of RIP1 and loss of executioner caspases prior to death receptor engagement by TNF-α. Moreover, RIP1 partially controlled levels of mitochondrial ROS in the context of hyperglycemia. As a result of its regulation of ROS, RIP1 also regulated necrosome activation and caspase loss. Mitochondrial ROS exacerbated neonatal HI-brain injury in hyperglycemic mice, as a result of the shift from apoptosis to necroptosis.
Subject terms: Necroptosis, Apoptosis
Introduction
Necroptosis is the major pathway of programmed necrosis and has been documented to occur in diverse cell types, including erythrocytes, leukocytes, cardiac cells, and neurons1–7. This pathway is driven by the cytosolic necrosome complex, which consists of receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIP1), RIP3, and mixed lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL) protein1,8,9. Downstream of this complex, MLKL oligomerizes and translocates to the cell membrane, forming pores10–13. In addition to MLKL, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are major effectors in necroptosis8,14,15. The formation of ROS during necroptosis is due to the interaction of necrosome components with several metabolic factors in the cell16. RIP3 may stimulate glycolysis and glutamate metabolism via activation of glycogen phosphorylase and glutamate ammonia ligase, respectively17. Moreover, RIP3 stimulates the citric acid cycle via activation of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex and glutamate dehydrogenase 1 (refs. 17,18). Stimulation at each of these metabolic steps ultimately leads to increased respiratory chain activity and ROS formation16. In addition, RIP1 has been shown to have a key role in direct stimulation of respiratory chain activity via activation of the transcriptional coactivator, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator 1 alpha19. While ROS produce downstream cellular damage in necroptosis14,15, they have recently been shown to be critical for the oxidation and phosphorylation/activation of RIP1, inducing necroptosis and amplifying it through a feedback mechanism20.
In contrast to apoptosis, necroptosis results in a pro-inflammatory outcome21–24. Rather than removal of dying cells by macrophages, as is the case in apoptosis25, cells undergoing necroptosis lose membrane integrity and lyse, releasing all cellular contents1,8,21. Despite the vast differences in outcomes, there is some overlap in the initial steps of TNF-induced apoptosis and necroptosis1,8,25. Both pathways may be induced by TNF-α and involve the formation of membrane–proximal protein complexes26–28. Following this the signaling pathways diverge, with apoptosis driven by caspases and complex II and necroptosis driven by RIP1, RIP3, MLKL, and the necrosome1,8,25. That these pathways share induction steps and reach a point of divergence suggests that different cellular situations may favor one pathway over the other.
We previously reported that hyperglycemia/high-glucose conditions are a cellular situation that favors necroptosis over apoptosis29. That work demonstrated that high glucose potentiates a shift to RIP1-dependent necroptosis, despite specific stimulation of extrinsic apoptosis. In addition, we showed that this cell death shift is relevant to neonatal hypoxia-ischemia (HI)-brain injury in hyperglycemic mice29. At that time, we noted two factors on which this cell death shift depended: RIP1 and ROS29. In the current study, we aim to understand the underlying molecular mechanism of the hyperglycemic shift from apoptosis to necroptosis, with a primary focus on the role of RIP1 and ROS. We demonstrate that ROS are necessary and sufficient to produce the cell death shift from apoptosis to necroptosis. Furthermore, we show that ROS are partially dependent on RIP1 during the hyperglycemic shift to necroptosis. Importantly, ROS are also necessary for this cell death shift in vivo, as we show an exacerbation of neonatal HI-brain injury in hyperglycemic mice.
Results
The hyperglycemic shift from apoptosis to necroptosis depends on mitochondrial ROS
The hyperglycemic shift from apoptosis to necroptosis involves ROS29. We measured total cellular levels of oxidative stress, as well as mitochondrial ROS using CellROX Green and MitoSOX Red, respectively. For this, U937 cells were cultured in 10 or 50 mM glucose at 37 °C for 24 h, followed by the treatment with TNF-α/CHX for 6 h, staining, and flow cytometry. Both total cellular oxidative stress and mitochondrial ROS exhibited a robust increase in 50 mM glucose (Fig. 1A, B). Through the use of specific inhibitors, we probed the source of cellular ROS during this cell death shift. U937 monocytes were cultured in 10 or 50 mM glucose at 37 °C for 24 h followed by the treatment with TNF-α/CHX for 24 h in the presence or absence of various inhibitors. In line with our previous work, TNF-α/CHX-induced cell death increased in 50 mM glucose (Fig. 1C–F). Scavenging of mitochondrial ROS with mitoTEMPO30,31 prevented this increase in cell death (Fig. 1C). Scavenging of cellular hydrogen peroxide with catalase32,33, however, had no effect on cell death in 50 mM glucose (Fig. 1D). In addition, inhibition of NADPH oxidases, another source of ROS34, with VAS-2870 did not affect cell death in 50 mM glucose (Fig. 1E). These results suggest that mitochondrial ROS are the source that drives the hyperglycemic shift from apoptosis to necroptosis.
ROS and RIP1 regulate one another during the hyperglycemic shift to necroptosis
We previously established that RIP1 is a key factor in the hyperglycemic shift from apoptosis to necroptosis29. When the RIP1 gene is deleted in U937 monocytes they undergo caspase-dependent apoptosis in response to TNF-α/CHX under hyperglycemic conditions29. To probe the role of RIP1 further, we utilized a U937 cell line in which RIP1 was deleted using CRISPR-Cas9 (ref. 29), as well as U937 cells transfected with nonspecific guide RNA as a nontargeting control (NTC). These cells were grown in 10 or 50 mM glucose at 37 °C for 24 h, followed by the treatment with TNF-α/CHX for 6 h at 37 °C. Using mitoSOX Red and flow cytometry, we measured levels of mitochondrial ROS. MitoSOX Red staining increased by approximately fourfold in NTC cells in 50 mM glucose (Fig. 2A). However, rip1 CRISPR KO cells only exhibited approximately twofold increase in mitoSOX staining in 50 mM glucose (Fig. 2A). This indicates that RIP1 partially regulates the increase in mitochondrial ROS during the hyperglycemic shift to necroptosis. In a separate set of experiments, the rip1 CRISPR KO or NTC cells were grown in 10 or 50 mM glucose at 37 °C for 24 h, followed by the treatment with TNF-α/CHX for 2.5 h at 37 °C, lysate preparation, and western blotting. Total and activated levels of executioner caspases-3, -6, and -7 decrease in NTC cells in 50 mM glucose (Fig. 2B). This decrease did not occur in rip1 CRISPR KO cells in 50 mM glucose (Fig. 2B). This shows that RIP1 is needed for the decrease in levels and activation of caspases during the hyperglycemic shift to necroptosis. In a similar set of experiments, RIP3 was immunoprecipitated and analyzed by western blot. RIP3 phosphorylation and co-precipitation of MLKL with RIP3 both increased in NTC cells in 50 mM glucose (Fig. 2C). However, this increase did not occur in rip1 CRISPR KO cells in 50 mM glucose (Fig. 2C). This indicates that RIP1 is necessary for RIP3 phosphorylation and necrosome formation during the hyperglycemic shift to necroptosis. Interestingly, while RIP1 appears to regulate mitochondrial ROS during the hyperglycemic shift to necroptosis (Fig. 2A), ROS scavenging by N-acetylcysteine (NAC) resulted in a decrease in total and phosphorylated RIP1 in 50 mM glucose (Fig. 2D and Fig. S1A). Moreover, induction of ROS with the superoxide dismutase inhibitor, diethyldithiocarbamate (DDC), resulted in increased total levels and phosphorylation of RIP1, even in 10 mM glucose conditions (Fig. 2E and Fig. S1B). Collectively, these results indicate that while RIP1 regulates mitochondrial ROS during the hyperglycemic shift to necroptosis, it is reciprocally regulated by ROS.
Reactive oxygen species activate necroptosis kinases while inhibiting caspases
RIP1 is known to be oxidized by ROS, causing it to form a high MW oligomer necessary for its autophosphorylation20. To investigate if this occurs during the hyperglycemic shift to necroptosis, U937 monocytes were cultured in 10 or 50 mM glucose at 37 °C for 24 h, followed by the treatment with TNF-α/CHX in the presence or absence of NAC. Analysis of lysates separated by nonreducing SDS–PAGE and detected by western blot revealed the presence of oxidized RIP1 in 50 mM glucose conditions (Fig. 3A). This high MW RIP1 oligomer was inhibited by NAC in 50 mM glucose (Fig. 3A). Using conventional SDS–PAGE and western blot, we determined that total and phosphorylated levels of RIP3 and MLKL increased in 50 mM glucose conditions (Fig. 3B and Fig. S1A). The increase in total levels and phosphorylation, however, was prevented by the inhibition of ROS with NAC (Fig. 3B and Fig. S1A). Immunoprecipitation of RIP1 revealed that co-precipitation of RIP3 and MLKL in 50 mM glucose was prevented by NAC (Fig. 3C). Conversely, levels of executioner caspases-3, -6, and -7 decreased in 50 mM glucose, but rebounded upon ROS scavenging with NAC (Fig. 3D). These results suggest a key role for ROS in silencing apoptosis, while activating necroptosis in high-glucose conditions.
To probe the role of ROS further, we utilized the superoxide dismutase inhibitor, DDC, to induce ROS independent of cellular glucose levels (Fig. 4A). For this, U937 cells were cultured in 10 or 50 mM glucose for 24 h at 37 °C, followed by the treatment with TNF-α/CHX in the presence or absence of DDC. Analysis of lysates via nonreducing SDS–PAGE and western blot showed RIP1 oxidation in DDC-treated samples, regardless of the presence of 10 or 50 mM glucose (Fig. 4B). In addition, total levels and phosphorylation of RIP3 and MLKL increased following DDC treatment in 10 or 50 mM glucose (Fig. 4C and Fig. S1B). Immunoprecipitation of RIP1 showed that co-precipitation of RIP3 and MLKL occurred following DDC treatment in 10 or 50 mM glucose (Fig. 4D). Moreover, total and activated levels of executioner caspases-3, -6, and -7 decreased following treatment with DDC (Fig. 4E). Taken together, these results suggest and activity.
Reactive oxygen species are necessary and sufficient to produce the shift from apoptosis to necroptosis
Our results thus far suggest a central role for ROS in promoting the hyperglycemic shift from apoptosis to necroptosis. To determine if ROS can promote this cell death shift independent of increased cellular glucose, U937 cells were cultured in 10 mM glucose for 24 h at 37 °C, followed by the treatment with TNF-α/CHX in the presence or absence of DDC. Cell viability was then measured and the impact of the RIP1 inhibitor, necrostatin-1s (nec-1s), and pan-caspase inhibitor, zVAD-fmk, was assessed. Treatment of U937 cells with TNF-α/CHX in the absence of DDC resulted in cell death that was prevented by zVAD-fmk (Fig. 5A). This is expected as TNF-α/CHX is a stimulus of apoptosis in normal glucose conditions25. Upon treatment with DDC, total cell death increased and could no longer be inhibited by zVAD-fmk (Fig. 5A). Conversely, the increased cell death seen in DDC conditions was prevented by nec-1s (Fig. 5B). These results indicate that cellular ROS are necessary and sufficient for the shift from apoptosis to necroptosis.
Hyperglycemia primes the shift to necroptosis via ROS-induced activation of RIP1 and caspase loss prior to death receptor engagement
Having established a role for ROS in promoting the hyperglycemic shift to necroptosis, we next determined the effect of high glucose on ROS production in the absence of death receptor stimulation by TNF-α/CHX. U937 cells were cultured in 10 or 50 mM glucose for 24 h, followed by the treatment with DDC for 2.5 h, staining with CellRox or MitoSOX reagents and flow cytometry. Even in the absence of TNF-α/CHX, there were robust increases in oxidative stress and mitochondrial ROS in 50 mM glucose or following treatment with DDC (Fig. 6A, B). As we observed increases in ROS in hyperglycemic conditions in the absence of TNF-α/CHX, we asked about the oxidation state of RIP1 in this situation. Indeed, RIP1 was oxidized to a high MW species in 50 mM glucose or following DDC treatment in the absence of stimulation by TNF-α/CHX (Fig. 6C). Moreover, levels of caspases-3, -6, and -7 decreased in 50 mM glucose or following DDC treatment in the absence of stimulation by TNF-α/CHX (Fig. 6D). Collectively, these results suggest that hyperglycemia primes cells for the shift from apoptosis to necroptosis via ROS-induced activation of RIP1 and loss of caspases.
The hyperglycemic shift from apoptosis to necroptosis exacerbates neonatal HI-brain injury via mitochondrial ROS
We have previously shown that the hyperglycemic shift from apoptosis to necroptosis occurs in hyperglycemic mice during neonatal HI-brain injury5,29. To determine the role of ROS in this cell death shift in vivo, we first detected oxidized RIP1 in brain homogenates. This high MW species of RIP1 increased in hyperglycemic mice undergoing neonatal HI-brain injury (Fig. 7A). Next, we determined the impact of mitochondria-targeted S-nitrosothiol (mitoSNO) on neonatal HI-brain injury in hyperglycemic mice. MitoSNO is a deactivator of mitochondrial complex I and thus ROS production35. Previously, it was shown that mitoSNO decreased ROS and prevented oxidative damage during neonatal HI-brain injury in normal mice36. Here, we show that administration of mitoSNO prevents exacerbation of infarct size seen in hyperglycemic mice undergoing neonatal HI-brain injury (Fig. 7B, C). Lysates from brain homogenates were analyzed via western blot, revealing an increase in total RIP1 in hyperglycemic mice that was prevented by mitoSNO (Fig. 7D). As seen previously, executioner caspases-3, -6, and -7 decreased in hyperglycemic mice undergoing neonatal HI-brain injury29. Administration of mitoSNO prevented this loss in caspases (Fig. 7D). In addition, PARP1 cleavage, a marker of apoptosis25, decreased in hyperglycemic mice, but rebounded upon mitoSNO treatment (Fig. 7D). When RIP1 was immunoprecipitated from hyperglycemic brain homogenates, RIP3 and MLKL co-precipitated, indicating necrosome formation (Fig. 7E). This co-precipitation was prevented following mitoSNO treatment (Fig. 7E). In agreement with this, RIP1 phosphorylation increased in hyperglycemic mice and was prevented by mitoSNO (Fig. 7E). Collectively, these results indicate that the hyperglycemic shift from apoptosis to necroptosis, which exacerbates neonatal HI-brain injury, depends on ROS (Fig. 8).
Discussion
ROS as regulators of cell death signaling
This work identifies ROS as important regulators of necroptosis, consistent with previous reports14,20. However, in this study, we have identified ROS as factors that regulate a switch from apoptosis to necroptosis. This occurs in a particular scenario: a hyperglycemic environment. TNF-induced apoptosis and necroptosis overlap in the first several steps of their signaling followed by a divergence of both pathways1,8,9,25. What regulates that divergence has been a topic of ongoing research. In the TNF-α pathways of apoptosis and necroptosis, this point of divergence is the formation of cytoplasmic complex II. It is at this step that either caspase-8 or RIP1 become activated depending upon whether apoptosis or necroptosis is occurring, respectively1,8,9,25. The formation of increased ROS as a result of exposure to high glucose is a key factor, which causes signaling to proceed in favor of necroptosis at this point of divergence. This hyperglycemic shift from apoptosis to necroptosis requires RIP1 in addition to ROS as this shift does not occur in its absence (Fig. 2B, C)29. While we have previously reported that high glucose leads to a shift from apoptosis to necroptosis5,29, the underlying mechanism remained unclear. Thus, this work reveals the roles of RIP1 and ROS in the mechanism of the hyperglycemic shift to necroptosis.
Mechanism of the hyperglycemic shift from apoptosis to necroptosis
Identifying ROS and RIP1 as key factors in the hyperglycemic shift from apoptosis to necroptosis has allowed us to determine a model mechanism. In the presence of normal glucose, engagement of the TNF receptor (TNFR) by TNF-α leads to the activation of caspase-8 and downstream executioner caspases causing apoptosis25. In the presence of high glucose, mitochondrial ROS produce a shift from apoptosis to necroptosis by mediating the following molecular changes: (1) oxidization of RIP1 leading to formation of a high MW oligomer, (2) formation of the necrosome leading to phosphorylation of RIP1, RIP3, and MLKL, and (3) decrease in the levels and activation of executioner caspases-3, -6, and -7. As a result of these molecular changes, apoptosis is silenced and necroptosis ensues in its place. In addition, our work has revealed that oxidation of RIP1 and loss of executioner caspases occurs in response to high glucose in the absence of death receptor engagement (Fig. 6). This suggests that ROS prime hyperglycemic cells to undergo necroptosis once they are bound by TNF-α.
Previous publications have shown that oxidized RIP1 is sometimes associated with a shadowing between monomeric RIP1 and oxidized RIP1 (>300 kDa) on western blots20. Despite this shadowing, those publications identified a >300 kDa band at the top of the gel as oxidized RIP1 (ref. 20). Following their approach, we also identify a >300 kDa band as oxidized RIP1. We feel confident that the identity of this band is oxidized RIP1. We believe this as this high MW species was abolished by an antioxidant (Fig. 3A) and induced by ROS via inhibition of superoxide dismutases (Fig. 4B). The shadowing effect above monomeric RIP1 has also been observed on reducing western blots37, suggesting it may be artefactual.
Translational relevance
This ROS-driven shift from apoptosis to necroptosis exacerbates neonatal HI-brain injury in the context of hyperglycemia (Fig. 7). In our experiments, we used mitoSNO35 which limits superoxide generation in the mitochondrial respiratory chain during reperfusion36. As mitoSNO protected against the hyperglycemia-driven exacerbation of neonatal HI-brain injury, this suggests a key role for mitochondrial ROS in this phenomenon. Moreover, our data suggests that ROS of mitochondrial origin mediate a shift from apoptosis to necroptosis during hyperglycemia (Fig. 7D, E). While the exact mechanisms for hyperglycemia-elevated ROS production in mitochondria is yet to be determined, it has been shown that during canonical necroptosis RIP1, RIP3, and MLKL translocate to the mitochondria and stimulate ROS production38. From an in vivo perspective, cerebral ischemia is associated with a dramatic increase in succinate accumulation36,38. Upon reperfusion, this accumulated succinate leads to excessive ROS release in mitochondrial complex I via reverse electron transfer38. MitoSNO transiently inhibits complex I reactivation during reperfusion and, therefore, significantly limits reverse electron transfer and the rate of superoxide production35,36. This suggests a possible role for reverse electron transfer in this ROS-driven shift from apoptosis to necroptosis during hyperglycemia.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
U937 monocytes were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) and were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C and 5% CO2. rip1 CRISPR KO and NTC U937 cell lines were generated using the CRISPR-Cas9 lentiviral system, as previously described29. NTC and rip1 CRISPR KO cells were cultured with 3 µg/mL puromycin for selection under the same conditions as the U937 wild-type cells. All cell lines have been recently authenticated and are free of Mycoplasma contamination.
Inhibitors and ROS scavengers
Pharmacological inhibitors were incubated with the cells at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 1 h prior to the addition of TNF-α at the following concentrations: VAS-2870 (5 μM), CCCP (10 μM), DDC (1 μM), nec-1s (50 μM), and zVAD-fmk (50 μM). ROS scavengers were similarly incubated prior to the addition of TNF-α at the following concentrations: catalase (100 units/mL), NAC (10 mM) and mitoTEMPO (500 μM). All inhibitors and ROS scavengers were purchased from Millipore-Sigma.
Preparation of cell lysates
U937 wildtype, NTC, and rip1 CRISPR KO cells were cultured in media supplemented with 10 or 50 mM glucose for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Following this, they were treated with 1 ng/mL TNF-α and 0.25 µg/mL cycloheximide for 2.5 h. Cells were washed with PBS and lysed with Tris-buffered saline (TBS) supplemented with 1% triton X-100, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 1× ProBlock™ Gold (Goldbio) for 30 min on ice. Lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. For some experiments, cells were cultured in 10 or 50 mM glucose for 24 h followed by lysate preparation. For other experiments, cells were cultured in 10 or 50 mM glucose for 24 h followed by the treatment with DDC for 2.5 h and lysate preparation. All reagents were obtained from Millipore-Sigma unless indicated otherwise.
Immunoprecipitations
Immunoprecipitation of RIP1 or RIP3 was performed on U937, rip1 CRISPR KO, or NTC cell lysates prepared, as detailed above. Following lysate creation, supernatants were precleared with agarose beads, and incubated with 10 µg of anti-human RIP1 (BD Biosciences) or RIP3 (Cell Signaling Technology) added to supernatants and allowed to incubate with gentle mixing overnight at 4 °C. Supernatants were then incubated with Protein G Plus agarose beads (Pierce) for 2 h at room temperature. Beads were washed thoroughly, resuspended in 1× Laemmli buffer, run on SDS–PAGE, and western blotted.
Cell death assays
Cells were incubated for 24 h in RPMI 1640 media containing 10 or 50 mM glucose at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Cells were adjusted to 1 × 106 cells/mL in fresh media and treated with 0.4 lytic units of TNF-α and 0.25 µg/mL cycloheximide for 24 h. The lytic units of TNF-α have been described previously29. Pharmacological inhibitors and ROS scavengers were added where indicated at the concentrations listed above. For each WST-1 assay n = 6. This n was chosen based on previous experiments5,29. WST-1 assays were performed in three independent experiments. WST-1 reagent was used to measure cell death according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Takara). Using WST-1, percent viability was calculated as follows:
Flow cytometry (CellROX and MitoSOX)
For flow cytometry analyses, 10,000 events were collected for each sample after gating out debris. Sample data were collected utilizing a BD FACSVerse flow cytometer. Data files were analyzed using FlowJo V10. Prior to analysis, cells (U937, rip1 CRISPR KO, and NTC) were incubated in 10 or 50 mM glucose for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Cells were treated with 1 ng/mL TNF-α at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 4 h. For ROS detection, CellROX Green reagent or MitoSOX Red superoxide indicator (Invitrogen) were added to cells at a final concentration of 5 μM and used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For some experiments, cells were cultured in 10 or 50 mM glucose for 24 h followed by staining and flow cytometry. For other experiments, cells were cultured in 10 or 50 mM glucose for 24 h followed by the treatment with DDC for 4 h, and staining and flow cytometry. For each flow cytometry experiment n = 6. This n was chosen based on previous experiments29. Flow cytometry experiments were performed in three independent experiments.
Western blots
Lysates, immunoprecipitates, and tissue homogenates were separated via SDS–PAGE, with and without the inclusion of reducer (2-mercaptoethanol), transferred to a PVDF membrane, and blocked in TBS-T buffer containing either 5% milk or BSA (for phosphorylated proteins) for 30 min at room temperature. The blots were incubated with primary antibody diluted in block buffer overnight at 4 °C. All primary antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology, unless otherwise indicated. Primary antibodies were used at the following dilutions: anti-human GAPDH (1:10000), anti-human caspase-3 (1:1000), anti-human/mouse caspase-6 (1:1000), anti-human/mouse caspase-7 (1:1000), anti-human RIP1 (1:1000), anti-human p-RIP1 (1:1000), anti-human RIP3 (LSBio, 1:1000), anti-human p-RIP3 (1:1000), anti-human MLKL (1:1000), anti-human p-MLKL (1:1000), anti-mouse β-tubulin (1:1000), anti-mouse caspase-3 (1:1000), anti-mouse caspase-6 (1:1000), anti-mouse caspase-7 (1:1000), anti-mouse PARP1 (1:1000),anti-mouse RIP1 (1:1000), anti-mouse p-RIP1 (1:1000), anti-mouse RIP3 (1:1000), and anti-mouse MLKL (1:1000). Following overnight incubation, blots were washed with TBS-T containing 5% milk (or BSA), incubated with secondary HRP conjugate antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. After the final wash, blots were developed with chemiluminescent substrate and read in a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc XRS+. All western blots are the results of three independent experiments.
In vivo brain hypoxia-ischemia model
All studies were conducted according to a protocol approved by the Columbia University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and in accordance with the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care guidelines. Hyperglycemia was induced in male and female neonatal (p10) C57BL/6 J mice subjected to regional HI-brain injury according to our description in ref. 5. Immediately after HI, mice were administered with either MitoSNO (500 ng/kg) or vehicle (DMSO) intranasally, 1 μl aliquots (10 μl total), over 40 min. At 24 h of reperfusion, all mice were sacrificed and the extent of brain injury was estimated using triphenly-tetrazolium (TTC) staining. Infarct volume was expressed as % of the hemisphere ipsilateral to the carotid artery ligation side. Brain tissue was also used to create homogenates which were analyzed by immunoprecipitation, SDS–PAGE, and western blot. N = 7 per mouse group. This n was chosen based on power analysis and previous experiments5. For TTC staining and analysis, investigators were blinded (unaware of sample identity), effectively randomizing the samples.
Statistical analysis
Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest was used to analyze significance of all quantitative in vitro data. One-way ANOVA test with Fisher’s post hoc analysis was used to determine difference in cerebral infarct volume in vivo. All results are from three or more independent experiments. Statistics were calculated using GraphPad Prism 5.0.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH R15-HL135675-01 to T.J.L., and NIH R01-NS100850 and NIH R01- NS099109 to V.S.T.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Edited by I. Lavrik
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Matthew A. Deragon, William D. McCaig
Supplementary information
The online version of this article (10.1038/s41420-020-00370-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References
- 1.Linkermann A, Green DR. Necroptosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;370:455–465. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1310050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhao H, et al. Role of necroptosis in the pathogenesis of solid organ injury. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1975. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.LaRocca TJ, et al. Human-specific bacterial pore-forming toxins induce programmed necrosis in erythrocytes. MBio. 2014;5:e01251–14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01251-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.LaRocca TJ, et al. CD59 signaling and membrane pores drive Syk-dependent erythrocyte necroptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1773. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.LaRocca TJ, Sosunov SA, Shakerley NL, Ten VS, Ratner AJ. Hyperglycemic conditions prime cells for RIP1-dependent necroptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:13753–13761. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.716027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Linkermann A, et al. Necroptosis in immunity and ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am. J. Transplant. 2013;13:2797–2804. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.McCaig WD, et al. Storage primes erythrocytes for necroptosis and clearance. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2019;53:496–507. doi: 10.33594/000000153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vandenabeele P, Galluzzi L, Vanden Berghe T, Kroemer G. Molecular mechanisms of necroptosis: an ordered cellular explosion. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010;11:700–714. doi: 10.1038/nrm2970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Grootjans S, Berghe T, Vanden, Vandenabeele P. Initiation and execution mechanisms of necroptosis: an overview. Cell Death Differ. 2017;24:1184–1195. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2017.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Petrie EJ, Hildebrand JM, Murphy JM. Insane in the membrane: a structural perspective of MLKL function in necroptosis. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2017;95:152–159. doi: 10.1038/icb.2016.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cai Z, et al. Plasma membrane translocation of trimerized MLKL protein is required for TNF-induced necroptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014;16:55–65. doi: 10.1038/ncb2883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sun L, et al. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein mediates necrosis signaling downstream of RIP3 kinase. Cell. 2012;148:213–227. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang H, et al. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein MLKL causes necrotic membrane disruption upon phosphorylation by RIP3. Mol. Cell. 2014;54:133–146. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fulda, S. Regulation of necroptosis signaling and cell death by reactive oxygen species. Biol. Chem.397, 657–660 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 15.Shindo R, Kakehashi H, Okumura K, Kumagai Y, Nakano H. Critical contribution of oxidative stress to TNFα-induced necroptosis downstream of RIPK1 activation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013;436:212–216. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.05.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Qiu, X., Zhang, Y. & Han, J. RIP3 is an upregulator of aerobic metabolism and the enhanced respiration by necrosomal RIP3 feeds back on necrosome to promote necroptosis. Cell Death Differ.25, 821–824 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 17.Duan-Wu Zhang, et al. An energy metabolism regulator that switches TNF-induced cell death from apoptosis to necrosis. Science. 2009;325:332–336. doi: 10.1126/science.1172308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yang Z, et al. RIP3 targets pyruvate dehydrogenase complex to increase aerobic respiration in TNF-induced necroptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018;20:186–197. doi: 10.1038/s41556-017-0022-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen W, et al. RIP1 maintains DNA integrity and cell proliferation by regulating PGC-1α-mediated mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21:1061–1070. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2014.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhang Y, et al. RIP1 autophosphorylation is promoted by mitochondrial ROS and is essential for RIP3 recruitment into necrosome. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41467-016-0009-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pasparakis M, Vandenabeele P. Necroptosis and its role in inflammation. Nature. 2015;517:311–320. doi: 10.1038/nature14191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kaczmarek A, Vandenabeele P, Krysko DV. Necroptosis: the release of damage-associated molecular patterns and its physiological relevance. Immunity. 2013;38:209–223. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Galluzzi L, Kepp O, Chan FK-M, Kroemer G. Necroptosis: mechanisms and relevance to disease. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 2017;12:1–28. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-052016-100247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dhuriya, Y. K. & Sharma, D. Necroptosis: a regulated inflammatory mode of cell death. J. Neuroinflammation15, 199 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Taylor RC, Cullen SP, Martin SJ. Apoptosis: controlled demolition at the cellular level. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008;9:231–241. doi: 10.1038/nrm2312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bang S, Jeong EJ, Kim IK, Jung YK, Kim KS. Fas- and tumor necrosis factor-mediated apoptosis uses the same binding surface of FADD to trigger signal transduction: a typical model for convergent signal transduction. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:36217–36222. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006620200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lavrik I. Death receptor signaling. J. Cell Sci. 2005;118:265–267. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Guicciardi ME, Gores GJ. Life and death by death receptors. FASEB J. 2009;23:1625–1637. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-111005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.McCaig WD, et al. Hyperglycemia potentiates a shift from apoptosis to RIP1-dependent necroptosis. Cell Death Discov. 2018;4:55. doi: 10.1038/s41420-018-0058-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Trnka J, Blaikie FH, Smith RAJ, Murphy MP. A mitochondria-targeted nitroxide is reduced to its hydroxylamine by ubiquinol in mitochondria. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2008;44:1406–1419. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dikalov, S. Cross talk between mitochondria and NADPH oxidases. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 51, 1289–301 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.Williams, J. The decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by liver catalase. J. Gen. Physiol. 11, 309–337 (1928). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 33.Alfonso-Prieto, M., Biarnés, X., Vidossich, P. & Rovira, C. The molecular mechanism of the catalase reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 11751–11761 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 34.Magnani, F. & Mattevi, A. Structure and mechanisms of ROS generation by NADPH oxidases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.59, 91–97 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 35.Murphy, M. P. Understanding and preventing mitochondrial oxidative damage. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 44, 1219–1226 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 36.Kim, M. et al. Attenuation of oxidative damage by targeting mitochondrial complex I in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 124, 517–524 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 37.Laurien, L. et al. Autophosphorylation at serine 166 regulates RIP kinase 1-mediated cell death and inflammation. Nat. Commun. 11, 1747 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 38.Chouchani, E. T. et al. Ischaemic accumulation of succinate controls reperfusion injury through mitochondrial ROS. Nature515, 431–435 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.