Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Oncology logoLink to Frontiers in Oncology
. 2020 Nov 11;10:587420. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.587420

Prognostic and Clinicopathological Significance of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α in Endometrial Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Ping Zhu 1,†, Longxia Shen 1,†, Qiuxia Ren 1, Qingxiang Zeng 1, Xiaocui He 1,*
PMCID: PMC7693720  PMID: 33304847

Abstract

Background

Current reports on the prognostic and predictive value of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) in endometrial carcinoma are inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to precisely evaluate the association of HIF-1α expression with susceptibility, clinical features, and prognosis of endometrial cancer.

Methods

Eligible studies that assessed the role of HIF-1α protein expression, immunohistochemistry detection, disease susceptibility, clinical features, and prognosis of endometrial cancer were searched from the Embase, Pubmed, and Web of Science databases. Stata 14.0 software was used to merge and compute pooled hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR). Information including HIF-1α protein expression and clinical progression of endometrial cancer was extracted. The pooled HR and OR with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to estimate the strength of these associations.

Results

A total of 25 studies were included in the analysis. HIF-1α protein expression in endometrial cancer tissue was significantly higher than that in normal tissues (OR = 15.79, 95% CI = 8.44–29.52, P < 0.05). Endometrial cancer patients with higher HIF-1α protein expression had poorer prognosis compared to patients with low HIF-1α protein expression (HR = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.68–2.90, P < 0.05). In addition, high HIF-1α protein expression was significantly associated with endometrial cancer grade, lymph node metastasis, and myometrial invasion (grade in Caucasians: OR = 3.09, 95% CI = 1.63–5.85, P < 0.05; lymph node metastasis: OR = 3.09, 95% CI = 1.63–5.85, P < 0.05; myometrial invasion: OR = 2.26, 95% CI = 2.15–5.08, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

HIF-1α overexpression was significantly associated with increased risk, advanced clinical progression, and poor prognosis in endometrial cancer patients.

Keywords: endometrial cancer, prognosis, HIF-1α, immunohistochemistry, meta-analysis

Introduction

According to Global Cancer Statistics 2018, endometrial cancer is the sixth most common tumor and the 11th leading cause of death in women worldwide with 382,069 new cases and 89,929 deaths in 2018 (1). Endometrial cancer is clinically divided into two categories: type I (95%) and type II (15%) (2, 3). Type I endometrial cancer is a low-grade endometrioid tumor that is commonly confined to the uterus, and patient survival rates after surgery are high. However, type II cancer which includes papillary serous tumors, clear cell tumors, and carcinosarcomas is more invasive and have a poor prognosis than type I cancer (4). In addition to surgery, targeted therapy for endometrial cancer has been developed in recent years. The angiogenesis pathway, PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, and glucose metabolism have been targeted by drugs, such as bevacizumab, ridaforolimus, and metformin for endometrial cancer treatment (5–7). However, there is scope for the development of newer biomarkers for detection as well as drugs that target other biological pathways. In 2013, the Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network published a study in the Nature journal, reporting on the integrated genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic characterization of 373 endometrial carcinomas using array- and sequencing-based technologies. The authors classified endometrial cancers into four categories: copy-number high (with poor 5-year progression-free survival rate), DNA-polymerase epsilon (POLE) (ultra-mutated, with >95% progression-free survival rate), microsatellite instability hypermutated, and copy-number low (microsatellite stable) (8). This reclassification reveals that different endometrial carcinomas had different molecular characteristics that might affect postsurgical adjuvant treatment for women with aggressive tumors (8). In this classification, each group of patients had a different BMI, which might suggest that obesity affects the genetic characteristics of endometrial tumors (9). In addition to BMI, hyperglycemia, hypoxia, and glucose metabolism had significant associations with endometrial cancer. Glucose metabolism in endometrial tumor cells significantly increased compared to normal cells and facilitated the proliferation and growth of tumor cells (10). Therefore, although many early-stage cancer patients are responsive to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, some tumors often recur because of tumor cell proliferation and angiogenesis (11). The rapid proliferation and growth of tumor cells and the development of tumor blood vessels often lead to local hypoxia. However, tumor cells are able to acquire sufficient energy to sustain physiological activity in the hypoxic environment, and this mechanism is closely associated with the activation of hypoxia-related genes, such as hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α).

HIF-1α is a transcription factor that plays a crucial role in the adaptive cellular response to hypoxia. HIF-1α regulates several biological processes, such as glucose metabolism, gluconeogenesis, high-energy phosphate metabolism, cell growth, apoptosis, erythropoiesis, heme metabolism, iron transport, vasomotor regulation, and nitric oxide synthesis (12). For example, the activity of glucose transporters (GLUTs), which are responsible for glucose uptake, is regulated by HIF-1α (13). The upregulation of GLUT1 induces the shift in glucose metabolism toward glycolysis in hypoxia. In addition, HIF-1α regulates the pH of the tumor microenvironment by promoting the expression of carbon anhydrase IX (CAIX) (14). In recent years, researchers have conducted many studies to investigate the role of HIF-1α in endometrial cancer to evaluate the predictive and prognostic value of HIF-1α protein expression. We retrieved relevant studies from databases and found that they were few in number, and their results were conflicting. Thus, we performed this meta-analysis to assess the association of HIF-1α protein expression with endometrial cancer.

Materials and Methods

Literature Search Strategy

We searched for relevant articles published up to May 2, 2020, using the Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The search terms used were “endometrial cancer,” “HIF-1α,” “carcinoma of endometrium,” “endometrial neoplasms,” “hypoxia-inducible factor,” and “prognosis.” In addition, the references of relevant literatures were scanned to collect other eligible articles.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

To collect all eligible articles and improve retrieval efficiency, the following standard inclusion criteria were developed: (1) articles that included the association between endometrial cancer and HIF-1α protein expression; (2) patients included were diagnosed by pathological examination; (3) the expression of HIF-1α protein was detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC); and (4) relevant data, such as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), survival curve, and clinical information, could be obtained from the article. Articles were excluded if they were (1) reviews, letters, case reports, meta-analyses, editorials, conference abstracts, or animal trials or (2) repeat studies based on the same data or cancer patients.

Data Extraction and Quality Assessment

Two investigators independently extracted data from eligible studies, including authors’ names, publication date, race, country, method of protein detection, HR and 95% CI of survival rate, survival curves, and cutoff value of protein detection. We applied the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to assess the quality of included studies and those with a score ≥ 6 were considered as high-quality studies (15). Any discrepancy in the data extraction process was resolved by consensus between investigators.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using the Stata 14.0 and Engauge Digitizer 4.1 software. The pooled HR and 95% CI were used to evaluate the role of HIF-1α protein overexpression in the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients. Further, the pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI were used to assess the association of HIF-1α protein overexpression with risk and clinical features of endometrial cancer (16). If the article did not provide the HR and 95% CI, it was extracted from the survival curve using Engauge Digitizer 4.1. Chi-square test and I2 statistic were used to calculate the pooled OR and 95% CI (17). Values of I2 ≥ 50% or P <0.05 revealed that significant heterogeneity existed among studies, and the random-effect model was used. Otherwise, the fixed-effect model was applied (18). The Begg test and Egger test were used to examine any underlying publication bias (19). In all tests, P <0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

Study Characteristics

We searched the Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science databases separately, and 131 articles were retrieved in the initial search. Duplicates were removed, and 95 articles were obtained. After we read the titles and abstracts of these articles, 16 studies were deemed not related to endometrial cancer or HIF-1α protein expression and were removed. In the remaining 28 studies, the full text was carefully screened, and 3 studies were eliminated because of no available data. Based on the inclusion criteria, 25 studies were included finally (20–44), among which 6 studies were on the survival of endometrial cancer patients and all 25 studies included risk and clinical features of endometrial cancer patients. The search protocol is depicted in Figure 1 , and the information extracted from the articles is given in Tables 1 and 2 . The quality of included studies is also provided in Table 1 . The quality score for the included studies on the relationship between HIF-1α expression and endometrial cancer was ≥6, and they were considered as high quality.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Flowchart of the search protocol for eligible studies.

Table 1.

Eligible studies for the risk of endometrial cancer and HIF-1α expression.

Author Reference Time Country Ethnicity Method Cancer type Histology Normal tissue Cancer tissue Cut-off value NOS
HIF-1α - HIF-1α + HIF-1α - HIF-1α +
Feng (20) 2006 China Asians IHC EEC Tissue 15 0 21 29 0% 6
Wang (21) 2007 China Asians IHC EEC Tissue 11 3 16 28 10% 6
Horree (22) 2007 Netherlands Caucasians IHC EEC Tissue 17 0 5 34 5% 7
Zhang (23) 2010 China Asians IHC EEC Tissue 16 1 9 30 5% 6
Feng (24) 2013 China Asians IHC EEC Tissue 26 9 43 81 0% 6
Chen (25) 2015 China Asians IHC EEC Tissue 19 4 23 35 0% 6
Wu (26) 2016 China Asians IHC EEC Tissue 37 3 24 41 5% 6
Zhu (27) 2019 China Asians IHC EEC Tissue 25 5 9 41 0% 6
Sun (28) 2019 China Asians IHC EEC Tissue 114 14 32 96 NR 6
Open in a new tab

IHC, immunohistochemistry; EEC, endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

Table 2.

Included studies for the survival of endometrial cancer and HIF-1α expression.

Author Reference Time Country Ethnicity Tumor stage Detected sample Num. Follow-up median Method Survival analysis Source of HR HR LL UL P Cut-off 95%CI
Abouhashem (29) 2016 Egypt Mixed IHC ECT 50 12 OS Curve 3.36 0.84 6.02 0.097 10% 0.84-6.02
Berg (30) 2016 Norway Caucasians IHC ECT 86 30 OS HR 2.17 1.37 3.49 0.004 NR 1.37-3.49
Seeber (31) 2010 Netherlands Caucasians IHC ECT 54 95 OS Curve 2.53 0.78 4.28 0.235 NR 0.78-4.28
Sivridis (32) 2002 UK Caucasians IHC ECT 81 75 OS Curve 1.86 1.04 3.64 0.03 NR 1.04-3.64
Aybatli (33) 2012 Turkey Caucasians IHC ECT 76 56 OS Curve 1.85 0.83 3.61 0.222 0% 0.83-3.61
Soo (34) 2017 Korea Asians IHC ECT 140 104 OS HR 3.79 2.18 6.35 0.001 0% 2.18-6.35
Open in a new tab

ECT, endometrial carcinoma tissue; IHC, immunohistochemistry; OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; NR, not reported.

Meta-Analysis of Patient Survival

Overall results indicate that HIF-1α protein overexpression predicts a poor prognosis in endometrial cancer patients (HR = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.68–2.90, P <0.05). This result is applicable to both Caucasians (HR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.41–2.73, P <0.05) and Asians (HR = 3.79, 95% CI = 2.18–6.35, P <0.05). No significant heterogeneity was found among studies, and the results of the Begg and Egger tests did not indicate any obvious publication bias. However, only one study was included in the meta-analysis of overall survival of endometrial cancer patients ( Figures 2A and 3A ).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Forest plots for the association of risk, clinical features, and overall survival in endometrial cancer with HIF-1α expression. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; (A) overall survival in endometrial cancer; (B) risk of endometrial cancer; (C) stage of endometrial cancer; (D) lymphatic metastasis of endometrial cancer.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Funnel plots for the association of risk, clinical features, and overall survival in endometrial cancer with HIF-1α expression. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; (A) overall survival in endometrial cancer; (B) risk of endometrial cancer; (C) stage of endometrial cancer; (D) lymphatic metastasis of endometrial cancer.

Meta-Analysis of Clinicopathological Parameters

Meta-analysis results for the association of HIF-1α protein overexpression and risk as well as clinicopathological parameters are presented in Table 3 . Significant heterogeneity is found in some analyses for clinical features of endometrial cancer patients ( Table 3 ). Here, the random-effect model was used to calculate the pooled OR and 95% CI. First, HIF-1α protein overexpression was significantly associated with the risk of endometrial cancer (OR =15.79, 95% CI = 8.44–29.52, P <0.05) ( Figure 2B ). In the subgroup analysis based on race as a risk factor for endometrial cancer, there was no heterogeneity. We also find a significant association between race and risk for cancer in Asians (OR =14.08, 95% CI = 7.82–25.35, P <0.05). Moreover, the results reveal that high HIF-1α protein expression is associated with advanced tumor grade in Caucasians (Caucasians: OR =3.09, 95% CI = 1.63–5.85, P <0.05), and HIF-1α protein overexpression clearly promotes lymph node metastasis (Asians: OR =3.99, 95% CI = 1.84–8.65, P <0.05) ( Figure 2D ) and myometrial invasion (Asians: OR =3.30, 95% CI = 2.15–5.08, P <0.05) of endometrial tumor cells in Asians. Although several studies explore the association of HIF-1α with the TNM (T: primary tumor; N: regional lymph nodes; M: distant metastasis) stage ( Figure 2C ), PR status, ER status, recurrence, and type of endometrial cancer (endometrioid type and serous type), no significant difference is found in the pooled overall results. The results indicate that some publication bias exists among studies for some analyses of risk, lymph node metastasis, recurrence, and myometrial invasion of endometrial cancer (P <0.05). However, this publication bias markedly decreases in the subgroup analysis ( Figures 3B–D ). Sensitivity analysis suggests that no individual study significantly affects the overall results; therefore, there was no need to remove a study.

Table 3.

Meta results for the association between HIF-1α expression and endometrial cancer.

Characteristics (Negative vs Positive) Studies Pooled OR (95% CI) P Heterogeneity Begg’s test Egger’s test
I2 (%) P Z P T P
Risk (Overall) 9 15.79 (8.44, 29.52) <0.05 50.50% 0.04 1.15 0.25 0.99 0.36
Risk (Asian) 8 14.08 (7.82, 25.35) <0.05 45.30% 0.08 0.37 0.71 0.38 0.72
Tumor grade (Overall) (G1 vs G2, G3) 15 1.78 (0.97, 3.26) >0.05 74.70% 0.00 0.99 0.32 -0.57 0.58
Tumor grade (Caucasian) (G1 vs G2, G3) 4 3.09 (1.63, 5.85) <0.05 14.10% 0.32 0.31 0.75 -0.38 0.47
Tumor grade (Asian) (G1 vs G2, G3) 9 1.21 (0.50, 2.91) <0.05 80.30% 0.00 1.70 0.09 -6.09 0.03
Lymph node metastasis (Overall) (N0 vs N1) 12 3.25 (1.78, 5.92) <0.05 63.00% 0.00 1.99 0.05 2.64 0.03
Lymph node metastasis (Caucasian) (N0 vs N1) 2 1.42 (0.79, 2.56) >0.05 38.70% 0.20 0.00 1.00 – –
Lymph node metastasis (Asian) (N0 vs N1) 8 3.99 (1.84, 8.65) <0.05 59.00% 0.02 2.10 0.04 1.08 0.32
TNM stage (Overall) (T1 vs T2-T4) 13 1.46 (0.91, 2.35) >0.05 62.80% 0.00 1.53 0.13 2.01 0.07
TNM stage (Caucasian) (T1 vs T2-T4) 7 1.35 (0.67, 2.70)) >0.05 74.10% 0.00 1.20 0.23 1.45 0.21
TNM stage (Asian) (T1 vs T2-T4) 5 1.27 (0.76, 2.13) >0.05 6.40% 6.40 0.73 0.46 1.02 0.38
FIGO ((Ⅰ+Ⅱ) vs (Ⅲ+Ⅳ)) 8 2.88 (0.89, 8.03) >0.05 88.90% 0.00 0.87 0.39 1.11 0.31
FIGO ((Ⅰ+Ⅱ) vs (Ⅲ+Ⅳ)) (Caucasians) 3 3.38 (0.50, 22.77) >0.05 95.00% 0.00 1.04 0.30 2.55 0.24
FIGO ((Ⅰ+Ⅱ) vs (Ⅲ+Ⅳ)) (Asians) 4 2.38 (0.35, 16.02) >0.05 85.50% 0.00 -0.34 1.00 -0.33 0.77
Myometrial invasion (<50% vs >50%) 11 2.26 (1.70, 3.01) <0.05 39.70% 0.08 1.71 0.09 2.81 0.02
Myometrial invasion (Caucasian) (<50% vs >50%) 3 1.18 (0.75, 1.86) >0.05 0.00% 0.93 1.04 0.30 7.14 0.09
Myometrial invasion (Asian) (<50% vs >50%) 6 3.30 (2.15, 5.08) <0.05 0.00% 0.55 0.75 0.45 1.26 0.28
PR 3 1.59 (0.29, 8.69) >0.05 91.10% 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.80 0.32
ER 3 0.92 (0.28, 3.03) >0.05 79.40% 0.01 1.04 0.30 1.93 0.30
Recurrence 3 2.71 (0.74,9.99) >0.05 73.00% 0.03 1.04 0.30 21.95 0.03
Type1 vs Type2 4 1.38 (0.19, 9.84) >0.05 93.70% 0.00 -0.34 1.00 -0.03 0.98
Pooled HR (95% CI)
OS 6 2.29 (1.68, 2.90) <0.05 0% 0.613 0.38 0.707 0.06 0.955
OS in Caucasians 4 2.07 (1.41, 2.73) <0.05 0% 0.92 0.34 0.734 0.05 0.964
OS in Asians 1 3.79 (2.18, 6.35) <0.05 – – – – – –
Open in a new tab

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; OS, overall survival.

Discussion

It is well established that oxygen is an electron acceptor that participates in most biological reactions and plays a central role in maintaining intracellular Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) levels. Therefore, hypoxia in tissues and organs can prove to be a serious health condition. We also know that, although rapid proliferation and growth of tumor cells need large amounts of nutrients and oxygen, hypoxic regions are often found in tumor tissues (partial pressure of oxygen <10 mmHg) (45). Therefore, the response to hypoxia is vital to the growth of tumor cells. In fact, multiple adaptive pathways are activated to enable tumor cells to adapt to low oxygen and poor nutrition microenvironments (46). The physiological process of hypoxia in cancer cells involves the interplay of reactive oxygen species (ROS), hypoxia-induced signaling pathways, glucose metabolism, and prevailing oxygen tension (47). In many cancer patients, hypoxia commonly leads to a poor prognosis due to natural selection of oxygen-resistant cells and cells resistant to radiation and chemotherapy, which makes metastasis more likely (48). HIF-1α is a sensitive transcription factor that can sense oxygen in the cell’s microenvironment and upregulate the expression of collagen and extracellular matrix remodeling enzymes, promoting tissue fibrosis and leading to tumor cell migration (49). In in vitro studies, HIF-1α inhibitors significantly reduced HIF-1α activity and inhibited the migration and proliferation of liver tumor cells (50). The intracellular accumulation of HIF-1α protein increased anti-apoptotic activity in hypoxia and radiotherapy (51, 52). Moreover, HIF-1α combined with p65 and p300 forms a complex that can affect cell function (53). However, mechanistic studies on the role of HIF-1α in endometrial cancer cells or any related cell line have still not been conducted. Based on the above evidence, hypoxia and HIF-1α might be good therapeutic targets for oncotherapy.

Here, we analyzed relevant literature to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of HIF-1α in endometrial cancer. The frequency of overexpression of HIF-1α in endometrial cancer tissue was significantly higher than in normal tissues. In addition, the expression of HIF-1α was significantly higher in endometrial cancer patients with grade 2 and 3 tumors than those with grade 1 tumors, which was found in both Caucasians and Asians. Because significant heterogeneity was found in Asians, we used the random-effect model and conducted a sensitivity analysis. The results of the sensitivity analysis indicate that no individual study disproportionately affected the pooled overall results for Asian patients. In the included articles, we found two studies that report opposite results, suggesting that HIF-1α is a protective factor for tumor development, which might have led to significant heterogeneity among studies (28, 35). Further, overexpression of HIF-1α significantly promoted lymph node metastasis of tumor cells. However, the results of the subgroup analysis suggest that the association was only found in Asians. Because only two studies in Caucasians were included for the analysis of lymph node metastasis, the statistical power might be lower because of the smaller sample size. In addition, HIF-1α protein overexpression was significantly associated with myometrial invasion of endometrial tumor cells in Asians. In the subgroup analysis, heterogeneity clearly decreased, which might indicate the effect of ethnicity on heterogeneity among studies. Notably, we also found HIF-1α protein expression in many other human cancers, such as bladder, lung, and colorectal cancer (15–17). The Sivridis study on the correlation of HIF-1α with prognosis of endometrial cancer is the first study to investigate the role of HIF-1α protein expression in endometrial cancer patients (32). Subsequently, several clinical or mechanistic studies were performed to determine the effect of HIF-1α protein in endometrial cancer. However, HIF-1α levels in different endometrial cancer subgroups remain unknown, and future studies on the new molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer are needed. We also analyzed the association between HIF-1α protein expression and other clinical features, such as TNM (T: primary tumor; N: regional lymph nodes; M: distant metastasis) stage, FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage, PR (progesterone receptor) status, ER (estrogen receptor) status, and recurrence of endometrial cancer; no significant associations were observed. Three studies were included for tumor recurrence with one study reporting a positive result. Therefore, more studies need to be conducted to observe the role of HIF-1α in endometrial cancer recurrence.

The pooled HR shows that HIF-1α positive expression is significantly associated with poor prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer. Patients with high HIF-1α protein expression had a lower survival rate than those with low HIF-1α expression; high HIF-1 α levels indicate that endometrial cancer tissues are hypoxic. HIF-1α also predicates a poor prognosis in ovarian cancer (54). However, in lung and colorectal cancer, HIF-1α is not related with patient prognosis, indicating that HIF-1α plays distinct roles in different tumor types (55, 56). No significant heterogeneity and publication bias was found in the meta-analysis for prognosis. Thus, the overall results of the analysis could be considered reliable.

This analysis had several limitations. First, although 25 eligible studies were retrieved, only a few studies were included in each group after classification based on PR, ER, and recurrence. Second, some heterogeneity among studies was detected in the analysis for clinical features; heterogeneity in the subgroup analysis decreased but could not be eliminated. This might be attributed to differences in sampling or detection methods and future studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted. Third, the quality of antibodies used for IHC was not consistent, which might also have contributed to heterogeneity.

Conclusion

In summary, although certain limitations exist, the results still demonstrate that HIF-1α overexpression is positively associated with high-grade tumors, lymphatic invasion, and myometrial invasion. Furthermore, overexpression of HIF-1α is a good predictor of poor prognosis of endometrial cancer patients. However, these results need to be further verified by well-designed studies with larger sample sizes. In addition, mechanistic studies on the role of HIF-1α in endometrial cancer should be conducted.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets presented in this study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material .

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: PZ, LS, XH. Performed the experiments: PZ, LS. Analyzed the data: PZ, LS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: PZ, LS, QR, QZ. Wrote the paper: PZ, LS, QZ. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2020.587420/full#supplementary-material

Click here for additional data file. (74.5KB, doc)

References

  • 1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A.Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortalityworldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin (2018) 68(6):394–424.   10.3322/caac.21492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Felix AS, Weissfeld JL, Stone RA, Bowser R, Chivukula M, Edwards RP, et al. Factors associated with Type I and Type II endometrial cancer. Cancer Causes Control (2010) 21(11):1851–6.   10.1007/s10552-010-9612-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Weigelt B, Banerjee S. Molecular targets and targeted therapeutics in endometrial cancer. Curr Opin Oncol (2012) 24(5):554–63.   10.1097/CCO.0b013e328354e585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Amant F, Moerman P, Neven P, Timmerman D, Van Limbergen E, Vergote I.Endometrial cancer. Lancet (2005)366(9484):491–505.   10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67063-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Simpkins F, Drake R, Escobar PF, Nutter B, Rasool N, Rose PG. A phase II trial of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab in advanced andrecurrent endometrial carcinoma (EMCA). Gynecol Oncol (2015) 136:240–5.   10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Amit MO, Sandro P, Andres P, Mary M, Andrew C, Benjamin S, et al. Randomized phase II trial of ridaforolimus in advanced endometrialcarcinoma. J Clin Oncol (2015) 33:3576–82.   10.1200/JCO.2014.58.8871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Rive S, Yael F, Zohar AG, Ami F, Ilan B, Haim W.Metformin downregulates the insulin/IGF-I signaling pathway and inhibits differentuterine serous carcinoma (USC) cells proliferation and migration in p53-dependent or -independent manners. PloS One (2013) 8:e61537.   10.1371/journal.pone.0061537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kandoth C, Schultz N, Cherniack AD, Akbani R, Liu Y, Shen H, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature (2013) 497(7447):67–73.   10.1038/nature12113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Roque DR, Makowski L, Chen TH, Rashid N, Hayes DN, Bae-Jump V. Association between differential gene expression and body mass index among endometrial cancers from The Cancer Genome Atlas Project. Gynecol Oncol (2016) 142(2):317–22.   10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.06.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Byrne FL, Martin AR, Kosasih M, Caruana BT, Farrell R. The Role of Hyperglycemia in Endometrial Cancer Pathogenesis. Cancers (Basel) (2020) 12(5):1191.   10.3390/cancers12051191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Muz B, de la Puente P, Azab F, Azab AK. The role of hypoxia in cancer progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy. Hypoxia (Auckl) (2015) 3:83–92.   10.2147/HP.S93413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lee JW, Bae SH, Jeong JW, Kim SH, Kim KW. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1)alpha: its protein stability and biological functions. Exp Mol Med (2004) 36(1):1–12.   10.1038/emm.2004.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Hayashi M, Sakata M, Takeda T, Yamamoto T, Okamoto Y, Sawada K, et al. Induction of glucose transporter 1 expression through hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha under hypoxic conditions in trophoblast-derived cells. J Endocrinol (2004) 183(1):145–54.   10.1677/joe.1.05599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Thiry A, Dogne JM, Masereel B, Supuran CT. Targeting tumor-associated carbonic anhydrase IX in cancer therapy. Trends Pharmacol Sci (2006) 27(11):566–73.   10.1016/j.tips.2006.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell DO, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; (2019). Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp [homepage on the Internet]. May 2, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. DerSimonian R, Laird N.Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control ClinTrials (1986) 7(3):177–88.   10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Zeng D, Lin DY. Onrandom-effects meta-analysis. Biometrika (2015)102(2):281–94.   10.1093/biomet/asv011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Begg CB, Mazumdar M.Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publicationbias. Biometrics (1994) 50(4):1088–101.   10.2307/2533446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C.Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.BMJ (1997) 315(7109):629–34.   10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Feng YQ, Wang ZF, Gu YT, Zhang LP. Expression and clinical Significance of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α and Bak in Breast Cancer. J Basic Clin Oncol (2006) 19(2):96–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Wang YL, Liu CG, Chen S, Huang S. Effection of HIF-1α and VEGF in tumor angiogenesis of endometrial cancer. Clin basic Res (2007) 14(15):1156–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Horree N, van Diest PJ, van der Groep P, Sie-Go DM, Heintz AP. Hypoxia and angiogenesis in endometrioid endometrial carcinogenesis. Cell Oncol (2007) 29(3):219–27.   10.1155/2007/434731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zhang CY, Dong JC. Relationship between the expression of HIF-1α, VEGF and microvessel density in endometrial carcinoma tissues. Clin basic Res (2010) 17(14):1086–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Feng Z, Gan H, Cai Z, Li N, Yang Z, Lu G, et al. Aberrant expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha, TWIST and E-cadherin is associated with aggressive tumor phenotypes in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol (2013) 43(4):396–403.   10.1093/jjco/hys237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Chen F, Liu WZ, Liu YX. Clinical significance of Twist, hypoxia-induced factor-1α and E-cadherin expression in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma and their corrlations. Chin J Cancer Prev Treat (2015) 22(11):858–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Wu H, Wang HK. Expression of SL11A4 and hypoxia-induced factor 1α protein in type I endometrial carcinoma and their significances. Cancer Res Clin (2016) 28(4):235–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Zhu C, Ding H, Yang J, Zhou Y, Luo Y, Shi S, et al. Downregulation of Proline Hydroxylase 2 and Upregulation of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1alpha are Associated with Endometrial Cancer Aggressiveness. Cancer Manag Res (2019) 11:9907–12.   10.2147/CMAR.S223421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Sun WHZ, Paudel D, Ouyang YQ, Song SR, Tong XW, Li HF, et al. Expression and clinical significance of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α and vascular endothelial growth factor in endometrial cancer. Acad J Second Military Med Univ (2019) 40(4):459–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Abouhashem NS, Ibrahim DA, Mohamed AM. Prognostic implications of epithelial to mesenchymal transition related proteins (E-cadherin, Snail) and hypoxia inducible factor 1alpha in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Ann Diagn Pathol (2016) 22:1–11.   10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2016.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Berg A, Fasmer KE, Mauland KK, Ytre-Hauge S, Hoivik EA, Husby JA, et al. Tissue and imaging biomarkers for hypoxia predict poor outcome in endometrial cancer. Oncotarget (2016) 7(43):69844–56.   10.18632/oncotarget.12004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Seeber LM, Horree N, van der Groep P, van der Wall E, Verheijen RH, van Diest PJ. Necrosis related HIF-1alpha expression predicts prognosis in patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. BMC Cancer (2010) 10:307.   10.1186/1471-2407-10-307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Sivridis E, Giatromanolaki A, Gatter KC, Harris AL, Koukourakis MI. Association of hypoxia-inducible factors 1alpha and 2alpha with activated angiogenic pathways and prognosis in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Cancer-Am Cancer Soc (2002) 95(5):1055–63.   10.1002/cncr.10774 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Aybatli A, Sayin C, Kaplan PB, Varol F, Altaner S, Sut N. The investigation of tumoral angiogenesis with HIF-1 alpha and microvessel density in women with endometrium cancer. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc (2012) 13(1):37–44.   10.5152/jtgga.2012.02 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Dong Soo S, Won Young P, Ki Hyung K, Ahrong K, Young Keum K, Kyungbin K, et al. Differential regulation and prognostic significance of endogenous hypoxic markers in endometrial carcinomas. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol (2017) 39(5):773–8.   10.12892/ejgo4281.2018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Huang YH, Yan CY, Wen RG, Deng M. Expression of hypoxia inducible factor-1 αand vascular endothelial growth factor in human prostate cancer. J Clin Urol (2004) 19(1):36–. [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Koda M, Sulkowska M, Wincewicz A, Kanczuga-Koda L, Musiatowicz B, Szymanska M, et al. Expression of leptin, leptin receptor, and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha in human endometrial cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci (2007) 1095:90–8.   10.1196/annals.1397.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Pansare V, Munkarah AR, Schimp V, Haitham AM, Saed GM, Morris RT, et al. Increased expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha in type I and type II endometrial carcinomas. Mod Pathol (2007) 20(1):35–43.   10.1038/modpathol.3800718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Tawadros A, Khalafalla M. Expression of programmed death-ligand 1 and hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha proteins in endometrial carcinoma. J Cancer Res Ther (2018) 14(Supplement):S1063–9.   10.4103/0973-1482.202891 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Ozbudak IH, Karaveli S, Simsek T, Erdogan G, Pestereli E. Neoangiogenesis and expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha, vascular endothelial growth factor, and glucose transporter-1 in endometrioid type endometrium adenocarcinomas. Gynecol Oncol (2008) 108(3):603–8.   10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.11.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Song Q, Xie YG, Shi GS, Zhang JG, Huang H, Xiao J. Correlational research between gene expression of HIF-1α, VEGF and color Doppler ultrasound appearance in endometrial cancer. Chin J Med Imaging Technol (2009) 25(5):870–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Espinosa I, Jose CM, Catasus L, Canet B, D’Angelo E, Zannoni GF, et al. Myometrial invasion and lymph node metastasis in endometrioid carcinomas: tumor-associated macrophages, microvessel density, and HIF1A have a crucial role. Am J Surg Pathol (2010) 34(11):1708–14.   10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181f32168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Wang D, Samrao D, Menesses T, Godoy H, Ough F, et al. The role of hypoxic-inducible factor (HIF1alpha) and aldolaseC protein in endometrial carcinogenesis: a retrospective study of 279 patients. BMJ Open (2012) 2(4).   10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Acs G, Xu X, Chu C, Acs P, Verma A. Prognostic significance of erythropoietin expression in human endometrial carcinoma. Cancer-Am Cancer Soc (2004) 100(11):2376–86.   10.1002/cncr.20244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Yeramian A, Santacana M, Sorolla A, Llobet D, Encinas M, Velasco A, et al. Nuclear factor-kappaB2/p100 promotes endometrial carcinoma cell survival under hypoxia in a HIF-1alpha independent manner. Lab Invest (2011) 91(6):859–71.   10.1038/labinvest.2011.58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Xie H, Simon MC. Oxygen availability and metabolic reprogramming in cancer. J Biol Chem (2017) 292(41):16825–32.   10.1074/jbc.R117.799973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Samanta D, Semenza GL. Metabolic adaptation of cancer and immune cells mediated by hypoxia-inducible factors. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer (2018) 1870(1):15–22.   10.1016/j.bbcan.2018.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Lee P, Chandel NS, Simon MC. Cellular adaptation to hypoxia through hypoxia inducible factors and beyond. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2020) 21(5):268–83.   10.1038/s41580-020-0227-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Brizel DM, Scully SP, Harrelson JM, Layfield LJ, Bean JM, Prosnitz LR, et al. Tumor oxygenation predicts for the likelihood of distant metastases in human soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer Res (1996) 56(5):941–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Eisinger-Mathason TS, Zhang M, Qiu Q, Skuli N, Nakazawa MS, Karakasheva T, et al. Hypoxia-dependent modification of collagen networks promotes sarcoma metastasis. Cancer Discovery (2013) 3(10):1190–205.   10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Karagiota A, Kourti M, Simos G, Mylonis I. HIF-1alpha-derived cell-penetrating peptides inhibit ERK-dependent activation of HIF-1 and trigger apoptosis of cancer cells under hypoxia. Cell Mol Life Sci (2019) 76(4):809–25.   10.1007/s00018-018-2985-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Koukourakis MI, Giatromanolaki A, Skarlatos J, Corti L, Blandamura S, Piazza M, et al. Hypoxia inducible factor (HIF-1a and HIF-2a) expression in early esophageal cancer and response to photodynamic therapy and radiotherapy. Cancer Res (2001) 61(5):1830–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Aebersold DM, Burri P, Beer KT, Laissue J, Djonov V, Greiner RH, et al. Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha: a novel predictive and prognostic parameter in the radiotherapy of oropharyngeal cancer. Cancer Res (2001) 61(7):2911–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Yoshida T, Hashimura M, Mastumoto T, Tazo Y, Inoue H, Kuwata T, et al. Transcriptional upregulation of HIF-1alpha by NF-kappaB/p65 and its associations with beta-catenin/p300 complexes in endometrial carcinoma cells. Lab Invest (2013) 93(11):1184–93.   10.1038/labinvest.2013.111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Osada R, Horiuchi A, Kikuchi N, Yoshida J, Hayashi A, Ota M, et al. Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha, hypoxia-inducible factor 2alpha, and von Hippel-Lindau protein in epithelial ovarian neoplasms and allelic loss of von Hippel-Lindau gene: nuclear expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha is an independent prognostic factor in ovarian carcinoma. Hum Pathol (2007) 38(9):1310–20.   10.1016/j.humpath.2007.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Yoshimura H, Dhar DK, Kohno H, Kubota H, Fujii T, Ueda S, et al. Prognostic impact of hypoxia-inducible factors 1alpha and 2alpha in colorectal cancer patients: correlation with tumor angiogenesis and cyclooxygenase-2 expression. Clin Cancer Res (2004) 10(24):8554–60.   10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0946-03 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Giatromanolaki A, Koukourakis MI, Sivridis E, Turley H, Talks K, Pezzella F, et al. Relation of hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha and 2 alpha in operable non-small cell lung cancer to angiogenic/molecular profile of tumours and survival. Br J Cancer (2001) 85(6):881–90.   10.1054/bjoc.2001.2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (74.5KB, doc)

Data Availability Statement

All datasets presented in this study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material .

Articles from Frontiers in Oncology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES