Abstract
In recent years, increasing evidence has implicated the importance of mutations in the MTHFR gene in the risk of gastric cancer risk. A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the MTHFR gene (rs1801133) may serve a critical role in gastric cancer. A hospital-based case-controlled study was performed to assess the risk of the rs1801133 polymorphism on gastric cancer. A total of 307 patients with gastric cancer and 560 patients in the control group were recruited. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood and genotyped for rs1801133 using the ligase detection reaction. The relationship between rs1801133 and gastric cancer risk was evaluated by unconditional logistical regression analysis. The rs1801133-TT genotype was associated with a borderline significantly decreased risk of gastric cancer [(TT vs. CC, adjusted odds ratio (OR)=0.54, 95% confidence intervals (CI)=0.35-0.83; P=0.006; CT vs. CC, adjusted OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.44-0.79, P<0.001; and TT/CT vs. CC, adjusted OR=0.61, 95% CI=0.44-0.83, P=0.001), and further analysis showed the relationship was evident amongst older patients and patients who never drank alcohol. The C>T mutation at rs1801133 of the MTHFR gene was associated with a decreased risk of gastric cancer in older individuals and those who never drink.
Keywords: gastric cancer, MTHFR rs1801133, polymorphism, risk
Introduction
Gastric cancer is one of the most common types of cancer. Worldwide, gastric cancer has the fourth highest morbidity and the second highest mortality rate (1). However, the incidence and mortality of different types of gastric cancer vary; for example, there is a decrease in the incidence of non-cardia gastric cancer, concurrent with an increase in the morbidity and mortality rate of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (2-5).
According to the statistics of Global Cancer in 2012, ~952,000 cases of stomach cancer were diagnosed, and there were >700,000 deaths, almost half of which came from China. Additionally, there were 405,000 new cases and 325,000 deaths in China (6). Developing countries have a higher proportion of gastric cancer cases, accounting for 70% of the worldwide total. Among these cases, East Asia accounts for ~50% of cases, and China is the worst affected, accounting for 45% of all gastric cancer-related deaths. Additionally, 42.6% of the incidence is attributed to China (7,8). Several studies have shown the importance of various environmental factors on the risk of gastric cancer (9). In addition to environmental factors, the risk of gastric cancer is also influenced by internal factors, for example, age, genetic factors, lifestyle and sex. In particular, genetic factors may impact gastric cancer.
5,10-methylene 4 hydrogen folate is a methylene 4 hydrogen folic acid reductase Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) catalyst, converts irreversibly into 5-methyl folate four hydrogen, which directs the distribution of folic acid derivatives to homocysteine remethylation and DNA methylation, or to biosynthesis of DNA and RNA, at a key metabolic branching point (10). Chromosome 1p36.3 contains 11 exons that encode MTHFR. More importantly, 5-MTHF is the only single carbon donor that produces homocysteine remethylation in the methionine cycle (11). The MTHFR gene contains >20 SNPs, some of which are non-synonymous and some of which are associated with cancer risk. In particular, genetic polymorphisms in the MTHFR gene are associated with colorectal cancer risk (12,13). A previous study found that rs4846048 increased the risk of colorectal cancer through its association with miR-522, and further regulated the survival and apoptosis of HeLa cells (14). Additionally, rs1801131 is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal toxicity (15), and the rs1801131-CC genotype is associated with sporadic breast cancer (16). The most frequently studied SNP is rs1801133, which is less common in gastric cancer; however, its role and prevalence in breast cancer and ovarian cancer have been studied (16-18).
It was found that rs1801133 was associated with the risk of colorectal cancer (19,20), ovarian cancer (17), gastric cancer (21) and liver cancer (22). To further verify whether rs1801133 is associated with the risk of gastric cancer, a case-controlled study was performed using individuals recruited from Zhenjiang (Jiangsu, China). The aim of the present study was to explore the relationship between rs1801133, environmental factors and the risk of gastric cancer.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
The present hospital-based case-controlled study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee for Human Subject study of Jiangsu University (Zhenjiang, China), and the study conformed to the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration (23) on Ethical Behavior in Human Research.
Study population
All subjects in the present study, including the cases and controls, were of Chinese Han origin. A total of 307 patients with gastric cancer from the Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University and the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University were collected between October 2014 and June 2016. Each patient was diagnosed with gastric cancer pathologically. The exclusion criteria were: Pre-existing cancer; the patient had undergone radiation or received chemotherapy; evidence of metastasis; or had an autoimmune disease. A total of 560 individuals with no cancer were recruited from the above two hospitals at the same time. Each of these individuals were interviewed to gather demographic data (such as age) and related risk factors (involving tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking). Participants who smoked at least 1 cigarette a day for 1 year were defined as ‘smokers’. Individuals who had more than 3 drinks a week for 6 months were considered ‘alcohol drinkers’. The median age was 63 years (age range, 40-90) in the case group and 62 years (age range, 40-88) in the control group. There were 223 males and 84 females amongst the case group, and 373 males and 187 females in the control group.
Genotyping
From each individual, 3-5 ml venous blood was collected. The sample was stored in a test tube lined with EDTA at 4˚C. Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood samples using a commercially available DNA blood mini-kit (Qiagen, Inc.). Genotyping quality was determined using a procedure that included success rates of >95%, repeated genotyping, internal positive control samples, and Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) tests (24). The MTHFR tag SNP rs1801133 was assessed according to the HapMap Project and Haploview version 4.2 (ihg.gsf.de/cgi-bin/hw/hwa1.pl). The ligase detection reaction method was used to genotype rs1801133, for which Shanghai Biowing Applied Biotechnology Company provided technical support (25). For quality control, 104 samples (12.00%) were randomly reanalyzed, and the accuracy rate was 100% (data not shown). To analyze the regulome DB score, regulomedb.org/ was used, and to analyze the minor allele frequency in Chinese individuals, snpinfo.niehs.nih.gov/snpinfo/snpfunc.htm was used.
Statistical analysis
A t-test was used to compare the age of the cases and controls. A χ2 test was used to detect differences in demographic variables, variations between smoking status, history of alcohol consumption, and frequency of the rs1801133 genotype between the cases and controls. A HWE test determined the expected frequency in controls using the standard χ2 test. Deviations from HWE in the control group were assessed using an internet-based HWE tool (ihg.gsf.de/cgi-bin/hw/hwa1.pl) (26).
To assess the relationship between the genetic polymorphism and risk of gastric cancer, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using unconditional logistical regression analysis, and adjusted for age, sex, smoking status and drinking history. Furthermore, genetic polymorphisms were stratified by age, sex, smoking status and drinking history. All statistical analyses was performed using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Corp.). The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. All P-values are bilateral and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Characteristics of the study population
As shown in Table I, there were 307 cases and 560 controls included in the present study. There was no statistical difference in age and sex between the cases and the control groups (P=0.218 and 0.067, respectively). The case group contained 185 smokers and 122 nonsmokers. Meanwhile, in the controls, 373 individuals were smokers and 187 were non-smokers. There was a statistically significant difference between the case and the control group (P<0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in alcohol consumption (P=0.223).
Table I.
Clinicopathological characteristics and risk factors of the patients with in gastric cancer and control group.
| Cases, n=307 | Controls, n=560 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | n | % | n | % | P-value |
| Age, years | 0.218 | ||||
| ≥63 | 162 | 52.8 | 271 | 48.4 | |
| <63 | 145 | 47.2 | 289 | 51.6 | |
| Sex | 0.067 | ||||
| Male | 223 | 72.6 | 373 | 66.6 | |
| Female | 84 | 27.4 | 187 | 33.4 | |
| Smoking status | <0.001a | ||||
| Never | 185 | 60.3 | 402 | 71.8 | |
| Smoker | 122 | 39.7 | 158 | 28.2 | |
| Alcohol use | 0.223 | ||||
| Never | 222 | 72.3 | 426 | 76.1 | |
| Drinker | 85 | 27.7 | 134 | 23.9 | |
aP<0.05.
The genotyping call rate was 100%. In Table II, the genotype distribution of rs1801133 C>T (P=0.112) is shown, which conforms with the HWE (P>0.05). The minor allele frequency (MAF) in the controls is similar to the Chinese MAF in the SNP rs1801133 database (27).
Table II.
Primary information of the MTHFR rs1801133 C>T polymorphisms.
| Item | Information |
|---|---|
| Genotyped SNPs | MTHFR rs1801133 C>T |
| Chromosome | 1 |
| Gene Official Symbol | MTHFR |
| Function | Missense |
| Chromosome positiona | 11778965 |
| Regulome DB Scoreb | 4 |
| nsSNP | Y |
| MAF for Chinese in databasec | 0.439 |
| MAF in our controls, n=560 | 0.444 |
| P-value for HWE test in our controls | 0.112 |
| Genotyping method | LDR |
| Genotyping value | 100.00% |
aBased on Genome Build version 36.3.
bBased on regulomedb.org/.
cBased on snpinfo.niehs.nih.gov/snpinfo/snpfunc.htm. MAF, minor allele frequency; HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; LDR, ligation detection reaction; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; nsSNP, nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphism.
rs1801133 and gastric cancer risk
The frequency of alleles and genotypes, and the associated ORs (95% CI) between cases and controls are shown in Table III. The observed frequency of the rs1801133-T allele in the control group was 43.9%, which was similar to the HapMap frequency of the Han Chinese in Beijing (44.4%). Compared with the control group (44.37%), the frequency of the T allele was significantly reduced (35.83%). The frequency of rs1801133 genotypes was 29.3% (CC), 52.7% (CT), and 18% (TT) in controls, and 41.4% (CC), 45.6% (CT) and 13% (TT) in cases, respectively.
Table III.
Logistical regression analyses of the associations between MTHFR rs1801133 C>T polymorphisms and the risk of gastric cancer.
| MTHFR rs1801133 C>T genotype | Cases, n (%) | Controls, n (%) | Crude OR (95% CI) | P-value | Adjusted ORc (95% CI) | Adjusted P-valuec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 394 (64.2) | 623 (55.3) | ||||
| T | 220 (35.3) | 497 (44.4) | ||||
| CC | 127 (41.4) | 164 (29.3) | 1 | |||
| TT | 40(13) | 101(18) | 0.51 (0.33-0.79) | 0.002 | 0.54 (0.35-0.83) | 0.006a |
| CT | 140 (45.6) | 295 (52.7) | 0.61 (0.45-0.83) | 0.002 | 0.59 (0.44-0.79) | <0.001b |
| CT+TT | 180 (58.6) | 396 (70.7) | 0.59 (0.44-0.79) | <0.001 | 0.61 (0.44-0.83) | 0.001b |
| CC+CT | 167 (54.4) | 265 (47.3) | 1 | |||
| TT | 40(13) | 295 (52.7) | 0.68 (0.46-1.01) | 0.681 | 0.71 (0.48-1.07) | 0.098 |
aP<0.01,
bP<0.001.
cAdjusted for age, sex, smoking status and alcohol consumption. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
When the rs1801133-CC homozygous genotype was used as the reference group, the CT genotype was associated with risk of gastric cancer (CT vs. CC, OR=0.61, 95% CI=0.45-0.83, P=0.002). The TT genotype was significantly associated with a reduced risk of gastric cancer (TT vs. CC, OR=0.51, 95% CI=0.33-0.79, P=0.002). In the dominant model, rs1801133-TT compared with rs1801133-CC genotype (CT/TT vs. CC, OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.44-0.79, P<0.001) was also associated with a reduced risk of gastric cancer risk. In the recessive model, the TT homozygous genotype was not related to the risk of gastric cancer (CC/CT vs. TT, OR=0.68, 95% CI=0.46-1.01, P=0.681) using the rs1801133-CC/CT genotypes as the reference group (Table III).
After adjustment for age, sex, smoking and drinking status, the TT genotype was associated with a significantly reduced risk of gastric cancer (TT vs. CC, adjusted OR=0.54, 95% CI=0.35-0.83, P=0.006; CT vs. CC, adjusted OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.44-0.79, P<0.001; and TT/CT vs. CC, adjusted OR=0.61, 95% CI=0.44-0.83, P=0.001). Using the rs1801133 CC/CT genotype as the reference group, the TT homozygous genotype was not associated with gastric cancer risk (CC/CT vs. TT, OR=0.71, 95% CI=0.48-1.07, P=0.098).
In order to evaluate the effects of the rs1801133 genotype on the risk of gastric cancer based on sex, smoking, age and alcohol consumption, a hierarchical analysis was performed (Table IV). Compared with the CC genotype, gastric cancer risk in the CT (adjusted OR=0.546, 95% CI=0.377-0.791, P=0.001) and TT (adjusted OR=0.447, 95% CI=0.276-0.823, P=0.008) and CT/TT (adjusted OR=0.525, 95% CI=0.369-0.748, P<0.001) genotype carriers was significantly decreased for male patients. Compared with the CC and CT genotypes, gastric cancer risk in the CT (adjusted OR=0.590, 95% CI=0.378-0.920, P=0.020), TT (adjusted OR=0.369, 95% CI=0.181-0.753, P=0.006), CT/TT (adjusted OR=0.534, 95% CI=0.348-0.818, P=0.004), and CT+CC vs. TT (adjusted OR=0.500, 95% CI=0.259-0.967, P=0.040) genotype carriers was significantly decreased in the younger patients. For older patients, compared with the CC genotype, the risk of gastric cancer was reduced in the CT (adjusted OR=0.601, 95% CI=0.386-0.935, P=0.024) and CT/TT (adjusted OR=0.618, 95% CI=0.408-0.936, P=0.023) genotype carriers. In addition to internal factors, the CT genotype may decrease the risk of gastric cancer (CT vs. CC, adjusted OR=0.411, 95% CI=0.236-0.717, P=0.002; and TT/CT vs. CC, adjusted OR=0.421, 95% CI=0.247-0.718, P=0.001) for those patients who have smoked. Based on alcohol consumption, the CT and TT genotypes may reduce gastric cancer risk (TT/CT vs. CC, adjusted OR=0.673, 95% CI=0.471-0.962, P=0.030) for individuals who drink. The CT and TT genotype may decrease the risk of gastric cancer (CC vs. CT, adjusted OR=0.427, 95% CI=0.226-0.809, P=0.002, and TT/CT vs. CC, adjusted OR=0.437, 95% CI=0.237-0.804, P=0.008) for individuals who never drink.
Table IV.
Stratified analyses between MTHFR rs1801133 C>T polymorphism and gastric cancer risk based on sex, age, smoking status and alcohol consumption.
| MTHFR rs1801133 C>T, n, case/controld | Adjustede odd ratio (95% confidence intervals), P-value | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | CC | CT | TT | CT+TT | CC | CT | TT | CT+TT | TT vs. CT+CC |
| Sex | |||||||||
| Male | 95/107 | 102/204 | 26/62 | 128/266 | 1 | 0.546 (0.377-0.791), P=0.001b | 0.447 (0.276-0.823), P=0.008b | 0.525 (0.369-0.748), P<0.001c | 0.677 (0.412-1.114), P=0.125 |
| Female | 32/57 | 38/91 | 14/39 | 52/130 | 1 | 0.748 (0.420-1.335), P=0.326 | 0.639 (0.300-1.361), P=0.246 | 0.717 (0.417-1.234), P=0.230 | 0.745 (0.378-1.466), P=0.394 |
| Age | |||||||||
| <63 | 64/86 | 68/152 | 13/51 | 81/203 | 1 | 0.590 (0.378-0.920), P=0.020a | 0.369 (0.181-0.753), P=0.006b | 0.534 (0.348-0.818), P=0.004b | 0.500 (0.259-0.967), P=0.040a |
| ≥63 | 63/78 | 72/143 | 27/50 | 99/193 | 1 | 0.601 (0.386-0.935), P=0.024a | 0.681 (0.382-1.215), P=0.193 | 0.618 (0.408-0.936), P=0.023a | 0.897 (0.534-1.510), P=0.683 |
| Smoking status | |||||||||
| Never | 72/121 | 86/201 | 27/80 | 113/281 | 1 | 0.763 (0.511-1.140), P=0.187 | 0.621 (0.360-1.072), P=0.087 | 0.720 (0.492-1.052), P=0.090 | 0.717 (0.441-1.168), P=0.182 |
| Smoker | 55/43 | 54/94 | 13/21 | 67/115 | 1 | 0.411 (0.236-0.717), P=0.002b | 0.466 (0.195-1.109), P=0.084 | 0.421 (0.247-0.718), P=0.001b | 0.803 (0.368-1.753), P=0.582 |
| Alcohol consumption | |||||||||
| Never | 85/126 | 105/217 | 32/83 | 137/300 | 1 | 0.704 (0.483-1.026), P=0.068 | 0.599 (0.355-1.009), P=0.054 | 0.673 (0.471-0.962), P=0.030a | 0.732 (0.461-1.160), P=0.184 |
| Drinker | 42/38 | 35/78 | 08/18 | 43/96 | 1 | 0.427 (0.226-0.809), P=0.009b | 0.486 (0.178-1.325), P=0.159 | 0.437 (0.237-0.804), P=0.008b | 0.790 (0.312-1.997), P=0.618 |
aP<0.05,
bP<0.01,
cP<0.001.
dGenotyping was successful in all cases and control.
eAdjusted for age, sex, smoking status and alcohol consumption.
Discussion
In the present hospital-based case-controlled study on gastric cancer, whether the functional SNP rs1801133 genotypes in the MTHFR gene affected the susceptibility of the Chinese Han population to gastric cancer was assessed in the present study. There was no evidence that rs1801133 TT, CT and TT/CT genotypes were associated with decreased risk of gastric cancer. The rs1801133 C>T polymorphism in the MTHFR gene was negatively associated with the risk of gastric cancer, as well as with age, smoking status and drinking history after correction.
Several studies have not been able to confirm a relationship between the MTHFR C677T genotype and gastric cancer susceptibility. The results of this study are consistent with those of Lin et al (28) and Chen et al (29), although the present study included more cases than the study by Lin et al (28). In the case group, more patients aged 55-63 years, male patients, and patients with a history of smoking and drinking were also enrolled in the present study. The study by Lin et al (28) recruited individuals predominantly from southern China, whereas the present study recruited individuals from eastern China primarily. Therefore, the present study is more relevant for gastric cancer susceptibility in eastern China. However, as the results of the present study and Lin et al (28) were consistent, this highlights the potential generalizability of the results at least regarding the Chinese population.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms of the MTHFR gene are associated with the risk of gastric cancer (30). Chen et al (29) found that MTHFR 677TT was associated with a reduced risk of gastric cancer, which has been confirmed by another study (31). In other studies, several groups reported that carriers of the TT genotype had higher response rates or improved survival rates than the CC or CT genotypes in gastric cancer patients receiving 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy (32,33). Of note, MTHFR polymorphisms have an impact on the efficacy of fluorouracil, as patients with different SNPs have been shown to have different reactivities (34,35). The homozygous genotypes rs2274976-GG and rs1801131-AA were more common in reactive patients, whereas the rs2274976-A allele (GA and AA) and rs1801131-C allele (AC and CC) were more common in unresponsive patients (6). MTHFR polymorphisms may serve an important role in regulating the clinical toxicity and efficacy of 5-FU (36). The C677T SNP may predict toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and fluorouracil chemotherapy in Costa Rica (37). However, patients with gastric cancer with CC or CT genotypes tended to have less chemotoxicity than those with the TT genotype. The C677T polymorphism predicted severe chemotoxicity in GC patients receiving 5-FU based chemotherapy, but could not predict efficacy (21). Chen et al (38) found a significant increase in gastric cancer risk in the Asian population. Zintzaras (39) performed study with 1,584 cases and 2,785 controls, and showed that the evidence for association between MTHFR polymorphisms and GC was predominantly present in East Asians and was not significant in Caucasians (39). To further clarify the relationship between the rs1801133 variant of the MTHFR gene and gastric cancer risk, the present case-controlled study using a large sample was performed. Through the analysis of alcohol consumption, sex, age and smoking status, it was shown that male, younger, former smokers and drinkers with the rs1801133 C>T variant had a reduced risk of gastric cancer.
MTHFR polymorphisms are associated with the risk of neurological diseases, psoriasis, various types of cancer, infertility and vascular diseases (40). Folic acid levels are associated with the MTHFR C677T genotype binding and microRNA (miR)-21 expression. miR-21 is a noncoding small RNA that regulates gene expression and is often found in secreted microvesicles (41). Tumor-derived microbubbles induce skeletal muscle cell apoptosis, resulting in a decrease in skeletal muscle quality, which is a characteristic symptom of cancer cachexia (42).
The MTHFR gene produces methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase, a rate-limiting enzyme for folic acid metabolism and DNA methylation, and folic acid is essential to rescue a vulnerable state (43). It is an active 77 kDa protein that catalyzes the transfiguration of 5, 10-methylenetetrahydrofolate to 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (44). There is evidence that MTHFR gene mutations lead to decreased thymidylate synthase (TS) activity in cancer cells, as a consequence of decreased levels of 5, 10-methylenetetrahydrofolate (45); the latter of which supplies the methyl for the methylation of dUMP to dTMP (46). TS is a critical and rate-limiting enzyme for maintaining an appropriate supply of DNA to ensure accurate DNA synthesis and repair (47). Thus, SNPs in the MTHFR gene may contribute to genetic susceptibility to cancer (48).
According to one report, the C>T variant at nucleotide 677 (in exon 4 at the folate-binding site) leads to a valine substitution for alanine, which is functionally relevant, causing a reduction in the activity of MTHFR (19). Studies have shown that individuals who are heterozygous for the rs1801133 polymorphism had 70% of the normal enzyme activity, while carriers of the homozygous polymorphism had only 30% of the normal enzyme activity (47), affecting folate metabolism (49). With regards to the relationship between MTHFR and folate, it has been shown that compound heterozygosity for the 677T allele was associated with reduced plasma folic acid levels (50). Another study found that rs1801133 C>T was related to low plasma folate content and significantly decreased MTHFR activity (51).
The present study has several limitations. Given that the case and control groups were recruited from the hospital, the study population may not represent the average Chinese Han population. Folate status may influence the relationship between the MTHFR SNP rs1801133 and gastric cancer sensitivity. However, no data was available on the intake of folic acid in these subjects, for which a prospective study would be required. Finally, an even larger sample size is required to confirm the results. Further research is required to improve our understanding of the interactions between genes and the environment in the causation of gastric cancer.
In conclusion, the results of the present study showed that the functional MTHFR rs1801133 C>T polymorphism may contribute to the susceptibility of gastric cancer in Chinese Han individuals.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to Dr Wei Zhu for their valuable input. We would also like to thank Dr Mei Wang for assistance with revision of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by funding from the Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Special Fund (grant no. BE2015666) and the Jiangsu Innovative Team Leading Talent Fund (grant no. CXTDC2016006).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
ZH and HS designed the study. QG acquired the data. QG and ZH wrote the manuscript. ZH and HS performed the experiments. YF and XX analyzed the results. HS and QG edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The experimental protocol used in the present study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Human Subject study of Jiangsu University (Zhenjiang, China). All patients provided written informed consent.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Sun L, Wang Q, Chen B, Zhao Y, Shen B, Wang H, Xu J, Zhu M, Zhao X, Xu C, et al. Gastric cancer mesenchymal stem cells derived IL-8 induces PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer cells via STAT3/mTOR-c-Myc signal axis. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(928) doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0988-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Potrc S, Ivanecz A, Krebs B, Marolt U, Iljevec B, Jagric T. Outcomes of the surgical treatment for adenocarcinoma of the cardia-single institution experience. Radiol Oncol. 2018;52:65–74. doi: 10.1515/raon-2017-0039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xin J, Wu Y, Wang X, Li S, Chu H, Wang M, Du M, Zhang Z. A transcriptomic study for identifying cardia- and non-cardia-specific gastric cancer prognostic factors using genetic algorithm-based methods. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24:9457–9465. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nguyen TH, Mallepally N, Hammad T, Liu Y, Thrift AP, El-Serag HB, Tan MC. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori positive non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma is low and decreasing in a US population. Dig Dis Sci. 2020;65:2403–2411. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05955-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhang X, Bai Z, Chen B, Feng J, Yan F, Jiang Z, Zhong Y, Wu J, Cheng L, Lu Z, et al. Polymorphism of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene is associated with response to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in Chinese patients with gastric cancer. Chin Med J (Engl) 2014;127:3562–3567. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bray F, Ren JS, Masuyer E, Ferlay J. Global estimates of cancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008. Int J Cancer. 2013;132:1133–1145. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wang W, Sun Z, Deng JY, Qi XL, Feng XY, Fang C, Ma XH, Wang ZN, Liang H, Xu HM, Zhou ZW. A novel nomogram individually predicting disease-specific survival after D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2018;38(23) doi: 10.1186/s40880-018-0293-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang XM, Zhong R, Liu L, Wang Y, Yuan JX, Wang P, Sun C, Zhang Z, Song WG, Miao XP. Smoking and COX-2 functional polymorphisms interact to increase the risk of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma in Chinese population. PLoS One. 2011;6(e21894) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Selhub J. Homocysteine metabolism. Ann Rev Nutri. 1999;19:217–246. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.19.1.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Luo Z, Lu Z, Muhammad I, Chen Y, Chen Q, Zhang J, Song Y. Associations of the MTHFR rs1801133 polymorphism with coronary artery disease and lipid levels: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis. Lipids Health Dis. 2018;17(191) doi: 10.1186/s12944-018-0837-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jamshidi M, Mohammadi Pour S, Mahmoudian-Sani MR. Single nucleotide variants associated with colorectal cancer among Iranian patients: A narrative review. Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2020;13:167–180. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S248349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ozen F, Sen M, Ozdemir O. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene germ-line C677T and A1298C SNPs are associated with colorectal cancer risk in the Turkish population. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:7731–7735. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.18.7731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhou X, Shan L, Na J, Li Y, Wang J. The SNP rs4846048 of MTHFR enhances the cervical cancer risk through association with miR-522: A preliminary report. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020;8(e1055) doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.De Marchi P, Melendez ME, Laus AC, Kuhlmann PA, de Carvalho AC, Arantes LMRB, Evangelista AF, Andrade ES, de Castro G Junior, Reis RM, et al. The role of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) in toxicity of induction chemotherapy based on cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2019;98:48–52. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hardi H, Melki R, Boughaleb Z, El Harroudi T, Aissaoui S, Boukhatem N. Significant association between ERCC2 and MTHR polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility in Moroccan population: Genotype and haplotype analysis in a case-control study. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(292) doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4214-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Xiong Y, Bian C, Lin X, Wang X, Xu K, Zhao X. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms in the risk of polycystic ovary syndrome and ovarian cancer. Biosci Rep. 2020;40(BSR20200995) doi: 10.1042/BSR20200995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Floris M, Sanna D, Castiglia P, Putzu C, Sanna V, Pazzola A, De Miglio MR, Sanges F, Pira G, Azara A, et al. MTHFR, XRCC1 and OGG1 genetic polymorphisms in breast cancer: A case-control study in a population from North Sardinia. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(234) doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06749-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Le Marchand L, Wilkens LR, Kolonel LN, Henderson BE. The MTHFR C677T polymorphism and colorectal cancer: The multiethnic cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1198–1203. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Slattery ML, Potter JD, Samowitz W, Schaffer D, Leppert M. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, diet, and risk of colon cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8:513–518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tang C, Yu S, Jiang H, Li W, Xu X, Cheng X, Peng K, Chen E, Cui Y, Liu T. A meta-analysis: Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism in gastric cancer patients treated with 5-Fu based chemotherapy predicts serious hematologic toxicity but not prognosis. J Cancer. 2018;9:1057–1066. doi: 10.7150/jca.23391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang S, Lin J, Jiang J, Chen Y, Tang W, Liu L. Association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase tagging polymorphisms and susceptibility of hepatocellular carcinoma: A case-control study. Biosci Rep. 2019;39(BSR20192517) doi: 10.1042/BSR20192517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. World Medical Association (WMA): WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. WMA, Ferney-Voltaire, 2018. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/. Accessed July 9, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rohlfs RV, Weir BS. Distributions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test statistics. Genetics. 2008;180:1609–1616. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.088005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hou G, Jin Y, Liu M, Wang C, Song G. UCP2-866G/A polymorphism is associated with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes. Arch Med Res. 2020;51:556–563. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sohn KJ, Croxford R, Yates Z, Lucock M, Kim YI. Effect of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism on chemosensitivity of colon and breast cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:134–144. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tang W, Zhang S, Qiu H, Wang L, Sun B, Yin J, Gu H. Genetic variations in MTHFR and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma susceptibility in Chinese Han population. Med Oncol. 2014;31(915) doi: 10.1007/s12032-014-0915-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lin J, Zeng RM, Li RN, Cao WH. Aberrant DNA methylation of the P16, MGMT, and hMLH1 genes in combination with the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T genetic polymorphism and folate intake in gastric cancer. Genet Mol Res. 2014;13:2060–2068. doi: 10.4238/2014.March.24.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chen J, Yuan L, Duan YQ, Jiang JQ, Zhang R, Huang ZJ, Xiao XR. Impact of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms and folate intake on the risk of gastric cancer and their association with Helicobacter pylori infection and tumor site. Genet Mol Res. 2014;13:9718–9726. doi: 10.4238/2014.January.24.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li S, Ji M, He N, Lu Z. Application of microarray-based method for methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms in the risk of gastric carcinoma in east China population. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2007;7:3245–3249. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2007.693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Galván-Portillo MV, Oñate-Ocaña LF, Pérez-Pérez GI, Chen J, Herrera-Goepfert R, Chihu-Amparan L, Flores-Luna L, Mohar-Betancourt A, López-Carrillo L. Dietary folate and vitamin B12 intake before diagnosis decreases gastric cancer mortality risk among susceptible MTHFR 677TT carriers. Nutrition. 2010;26:201–208. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2009.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lu JW, Gao CM, Wu JZ, Sun XF, Wang L, Feng JF. Relationship of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism and chemosensitivity to 5-fluorouracil in gastric carcinoma. Ai Zheng. 2004;23:958–962. (In Chinese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rozen R. Molecular genetics of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase deficiency. J Inherit Metab Dis. 1996;19:589–594. doi: 10.1007/BF01799831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Custodio A, Moreno-Rubio J, Aparicio J, Gallego-Plazas J, Yaya R, Maurel J, Rodríguez-Salas N, Burgos E, Ramos D, Calatrava A, et al. Pharmacogenetic predictors of outcome in patients with stage II and III colon cancer treated with oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13:2226–2237. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cecchin E, Perrone G, Nobili S, Polesel J, De Mattia E, Zanusso C, Petreni P, Lonardi S, Pella N, D'Andrea M, et al. MTHFR-1298 A>C (rs1801131) is a predictor of survival in two cohorts of stage II/III colorectal cancer patients treated with adjuvant fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy with or without oxaliplatin. Pharmacogenomics J. 2015;15:219–225. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2014.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.De Mattia E, Toffoli G. C677T and A1298C MTHFR polymorphisms, a challenge for antifolate and fluoropyrimidine-based therapy personalisation. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:1333–1351. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ramos-Esquivel A, Chinchilla R, Valle M. Association of C677T and A1298C MTHFR polymorphisms and fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity in mestizo patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2020;40:4263–4270. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chen L, Lu N, Zhang BH, Weng LI, Lu J. Association between the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and gastric cancer susceptibility: A meta-analysis of 5,757 cases and 8,501 controls. Oncol Lett. 2015;10:1159–1165. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zintzaras E. Association of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms with genetic susceptibility to gastric cancer: A meta-analysis. J Hum Genet. 2006;51:618–624. doi: 10.1007/s10038-006-0405-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Liew SC, Gupta ED. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism: Epidemiology, metabolism and the associated diseases. Eur J Med Genet. 2015;58:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2014.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Beckett EL, Martin C, Choi JH, King K, Niblett S, Boyd L, Duesing K, Yates Z, Veysey M, Lucock M. Folate status, folate-related genes and serum miR-21 expression: Implications for miR-21 as a biomarker. BBA Clin. 2015;4:45–51. doi: 10.1016/j.bbacli.2015.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.He WA, Calore F, Londhe P, Canella A, Guttridge DC, Croce CM. Microvesicles containing miRNAs promote muscle cell death in cancer cachexia via TLR7. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:4525–4529. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402714111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Vidmar Golja M, Smid A, Karas Kuzelicki N, Trontelj J, Gersak K, Mlinaric-Rascan I. Folate insufficiency due to MTHFR deficiency is bypassed by 5-methyltetrahydrofolate. J Clin Med. 2020;9 doi: 10.3390/jcm9092836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kim YI. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms, folate, and cancer risk: A paradigm of gene-nutrient interactions in carcinogenesis. Nutr Rev. 2000;58:205–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2000.tb01863.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tan W, Miao X, Wang L, Yu C, Xiong P, Liang G, Sun T, Zhou Y, Zhang X, Li H, Lin D. Significant increase in risk of gastroesophageal cancer is associated with interaction between promoter polymorphisms in thymidylate synthase and serum folate status. Carcinogenesis. 2005;26:1430–1435. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgi090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chai W, Zhang Z, Ni M, Geng P, Lian Z, Zhang G, Shi LL, Chen J. Genetic association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphism and risk of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015(196495) doi: 10.1155/2015/196495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jain M, Pandey P, Tiwary NK, Jain S. MTHFR C677T polymorphism is associated with hyperlipidemia in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2012;5:52–56. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.97802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Födinger M, Wagner OF, Hörl WH, Sunder-Plassmann G. Recent insights into the molecular genetics of the homocysteine metabolism. Kidney Int Suppl. 2001;78:S238–S242. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.59780238.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kim YI. Role of the MTHFR polymorphisms in cancer risk modification and treatment. Future Oncol. 2009;5:523–542. doi: 10.2217/fon.09.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bezerra JF, Oliveira GH, Soares CD, Cardoso ML, Ururahy MA, Neto FP, Lima-Neto LG, Luchessi AD, Silbiger VN, Fajardo CM, et al. Genetic and non-genetic factors that increase the risk of non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate development. Oral Dis. 2015;21:393–399. doi: 10.1111/odi.12292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ericson UC, Ivarsson MI, Sonestedt E, Gullberg B, Carlson J, Olsson H, Wirfält E. Increased breast cancer risk at high plasma folate concentrations among women with the MTHFR 677T allele. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90:1380–1389. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
