Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 12;12(11):1086. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12111086

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Forest plot showing probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction and clinical attachment level (CAL) gain in local drug delivery and adjunctive agents (LDAs) vs. subgingival mechanical debridement (SMD) alone in split-mouth studies. (B) Forest plot showing PPD reduction and CAL gain in LDAs vs. SMD alone in parallel studies. The P-score indicates the treatment’s probability in ranking the best in efficacy in the network. The dotted line represents the threshold for clinical significance.