Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 11;8(11):1772. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8111772

Table 3.

Machine learning model performance for prediction of L. monocytogenes stress response categories.

Stress Type *
Model Acid Cold Salt Desiccation
GBM 0.87 abc (0.83–0.89) 0.97 a (0.96–0.98) 0.89 a (0.87–0.90) 0.89 ab (0.86–0.90)
RF 0.87 ab (0.86–0.88) 0.97 a (0.95–0.98) 0.89 a (0.87–0.90) 0.91 a (0.88–0.92)
SVMR 0.89 c (0.88–0.89) 0.97 a (0.96–0.98) 0.83 b (0.81–0.84) 0.83 c (0.80–0.84)
SVML 0.85 a (0.84–0.87) 0.96 a (0.94–0.97) 0.85 b (0.83–0.86) 0.88 ab (0.86–0.90)
NN 0.72 d (0.68–0.78) 0.96 a (0.93–0.98) 0.63 c (0.57–0.68) 0.69 d (0.56–0.76)
LB 0.89 bc (0.88–0.90) 0.97 a (0.97–0.98) 0.85 ab (0.83–0.88) 0.86 bc (0.85–0.88)

* Mean (range); means within a column with similar lower case superscript letter are not significantly different; random forest (RF), support vector machine (radial (SVMR) and linear (SVML) kernels), gradient boosting (GBM), neural network (NN) and logit boost (LB) models.