Abstract
Mango has been described as a valuable source of nutrients and enzymes that are beneficial to human health. Drying at different temperatures not only affects the nutritional properties but can also contribute to the degradation of valuable enzymes in dried fruit. The novelty of this paper is to investigate the quality of hot air dried mango in terms of activity retention of the heat-sensitive enzymes (HSE). For this, HSE was first screened in fresh mango flesh of the variety Samar Bahisht (SB) Chaunsa. Later, the combined effect of different drying temperatures (40 °C, 50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, and 80 °C) and air velocities (1.0 ms−1 and 1.4 ms−1) on the activity retention of HSE in dried mango slices of the varieties Sindri, SB Chaunsa, and Tommy Atkins were investigated. The results showed that the drying temperature had a significant impact on the degradation of HSE, while at the same time some influence of the air velocity was also observed. Drying at 40 °C and an air velocity of 1.4 ms−1 retained more HSE compared to those samples dried at higher temperatures. The least retention of HSE was found in samples dried at 80 °C.
Keywords: heat-sensitive enzyme, convective drying, Sindri, Samar Bahisht Chaunsa, Tommy Atkins
1. Introduction
Mango (Mangifera indica L.) is one of the most popular fleshy stone fruits. It is native to South Asia, from where it has been distributed worldwide to become the most cultivated fruit in the tropics [1]. With an annual production of over 54.6 million tons, mango ranked sixth among the major fruit crops [2]. In recent years, the world demand for mango has been increasing rapidly both for fresh and for processed fruits. The primary mango producing countries in the world are India, China, Thailand, Pakistan, Mexico, and Indonesia [3].
Mango flesh is of great importance due to its rich nutritional value as well as being a good source of health-promoting enzymes including antioxidant enzyme (catalase), also known as a perfect catalyst, and the digestive enzymes amylase and invertase [4,5]. Catalase is believed to be a key antioxidant enzyme and helps to protect cells from toxic reactive oxygen species. It is vital for good health to maintain an adequate level of the catalase enzyme and to replenish the depletion brought on by aging, strenuous exercise, and environmental conditions [6]. The amylase and invertase are necessary for the digestion process as they break down complex molecules into simpler forms. If the human body is unable to produce enough digestive enzymes, it can lead to digestive disorders [7]. Thus, incorporating foods into our diet with high natural enzymes like mango might be an important part of a dietary regimen to maintain health and wellness.
Mango, however, is highly perishable and deteriorates very fast after harvest due to ripening and putrescence. Therefore, numerous processing efforts have been made to offer an alternative to their fresh consumption. To prolong their availability on the market, hot air drying is one of the most common techniques used to reduce the moisture content to a level that prohibits the growth of microorganisms [8]. Mango and other tropical fruits are commonly dried to a target moisture content below a 15% wet basis at air temperatures between 40 and 80 °C and air velocity around 0.2–2.0 ms−1 and specific humidity of 10–25 g/kg [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Many experimental studies have proven that hot air drying of fruit is significantly influenced by the drying temperature and air velocity, whereas the specific humidity did not have a major impact on the drying rate [8,11,16,17]. Furthermore, many researchers have extensively documented the influence of these drying conditions on quality attributes such as color, texture, total soluble solids (TSS), starch, sugar, moisture content, fibers, phenolic contents, vitamins, and antioxidants of the dried mango [9,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. In most of these studies, it was well observed that drying at temperatures of 70 °C and 80 °C contributed to rapid degradation of the fruit’s nutritional components, whereas this loss was greatly reduced at temperatures of 40 °C to 60 °C. Although the effects of different drying conditions on product quality are well studied, there is still a lack of information related to enzymatic activity retention, particularly in the varieties Sindri, Samar Bahisht Chaunsa, and Tommy Atkins. Since enzymes are mainly proteins in nature, the inter- and intra-molecular bonds of proteins may be disrupted under different drying conditions and their efficacy may decrease. Consequently, obtaining information about the drying operating parameters and its relationship to the enzymatic activity retention in dried mango is highly important because of the health benefits of the enzymes.
Nowadays, the use of enzyme supplements is also becoming increasingly popular. Dehydrated mango slices that preserve high levels of active enzymes may serve as an effective healthy snack. The greatest challenge in the modern food industry is not only to minimize the chemical degradation reactions but also to maximize the conservation of beneficial enzymes during drying. The objective of this study was to investigate and compare the most influential parameters of hot air drying, such as temperature and air velocity on the activity retention of heat-sensitive enzymes in dried mango slices. To screen the heat-sensitive enzymes, the initial selection was based on the enzymes that are most commonly studied in fresh mango of different varieties and are present in a concentration that is easy to measure. Therefore, the enzymes selected for this research work were catalase, polyphenol oxidase (PPO), amylase, and invertase [25,26,27,28]. After measuring the sensitivity level for each of the selected enzymes, we further evaluate the quality of hot air dried mango in terms of activity retention of heat-sensitive enzymes. The results from this research work will also provide a scientific basis to select the appropriate drying conditions to retain a maximum of heat-sensitive enzymes in dried mango.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Effect of Incubation Temperature on Enzyme Activity in Fresh Mango
Figure 1 presents the enzymatic activity of amylase, invertase, polyphenol oxidase (PPO), and catalase obtained after incubating extracted mango samples for 10 min at different temperatures.
Amylase and invertase revealed a high heat tolerance, as there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in activity measured at different temperatures. The highest amylase activity (4.29 units min−1·g−1) and invertase activity (1.02 units min−1·g−1) were observed at 40 °C. However, no significant differences could be found between 30 °C and 80 °C. Similar information on the thermostability of amylase activity in mango peel by Mehrnoush et al. [29] and invertase from Aspergillus caespitosus under culture conditions of submerged or solid-state fermentation was also reported [30].
While amylase and invertase showed no effect of incubation temperature, the activity of PPO and catalase was considerably reduced by increased temperature. The PPO activity of 35.20 OD min−1·g−1 at 30 °C decreased to 23.00 OD min−1·g−1 at 80 °C, representing a 34.66% reduction. These findings are in agreement with the results reported by different scientists on heat inactivation of PPO enzyme in different fruits and vegetables [31,32,33]. The catalase activity at 25 °C of 33.20 µmol·min−1·g−1 gradually decreased to 2.33 µmol·min−1·g−1 at 85 °C, representing a 92.98% reduction in catalase activity. Wang [34] found a similar effect of temperature on the catalase activity in chilled zucchini squash. Based on the screening results, the catalase was found as a more heat-sensitive enzyme and selected as our target enzyme. However, PPO also behaves somehow like catalase and the information about the PPO enzyme is important during storage of dried products. Hence, PPO and catalase as heat-sensitive enzymes were chosen to proceed with the drying experiments.
2.2. Polyphenoloxidase (PPO) Activity of Fresh and Dried Mango
PPO activity was measured in fresh and dried samples of varieties Sindri, Samar Bahisht (SB) Chaunsa, and Tommy Atkins (Figure 2).
The maximum PPO activity was measured in fresh samples of Sindri (30.00–80.89 OD min−1·g−1) followed by SB Chaunsa (26.00–46.67 OD min−1·g−1) and Tommy Atkins (10.67–28.87 OD min−1·g−1). However, in the dried samples of all three varieties, low drying temperature 40 °C and high air velocity 1.4 ms−1 retained the maximum PPO activity of Sindri (113.37–315.20 OD min−1·g−1), SB Chaunsa (75.97–159.85 OD min−1·g−1), and Tommy Atkins (TA) (47.60–86.17 OD min−1·g−1) compared to mango dried at 50 °C to 80 °C. The results obtained from this study correspond with those found in fresh mango [5,26] and the heat inactivation of PPO enzymes in different fruits [32,35,36]. min−1·g−1.
PPO is an important enzyme that has numerous health-promoting properties including antiviral, anticarcinogen, antimicrobial, and antimutagenic agents [37,38,39] and can be used in several industrial applications [40,41]. However, this enzyme is also known to be responsible for the enzymatic browning of fruits [42]. Drying up to a safe water activity level of aw ≤ 0.6 is required to inactivate this enzyme [32]. Moreover, it is also important to understand that mango slices dried at 40 °C not only preserve the beneficial enzymes but also those enzymes that are involved in the oxidation of the phenolic compounds or are susceptible to color deterioration. Therefore, the mango slices dried at 40 °C should be packaged and stored appropriately.
2.3. Catalase Activity of Fresh and Dried Mango
Figure 3 shows the catalase activity of fresh and dried mango of the varieties Sindri, SB Chaunsa, and Tommy Atkins. When comparing the fresh samples of all three varieties, the maximum catalase activity was observed in SB Chaunsa (17.03 to 27.42 µmol·min−1·g−1) followed by Sindri (8.73 to 19.5 µmol·min−1·g−1) and Tommy Atkins (2.08 to 7.58 µmol·min−1·g−1).
The varieties Sindri and SB Chanusa had a higher catalase activity in the fresh samples compared to Tommy Atkins, which might be due to varietal differences, different climatic origins, compositional variations, and fruit maturity stages. These results are also corresponding to research on changes in catalase activity during storage and ripening of the fruits [43,44]. Since catalase activity is closely associated with the ripening and maturity of fruit, the difference in catalase activity of the three varieties can be related to the brix values as presented in Table 1. However, after drying, the quality of the final dried mango was evaluated in terms of residual catalase activity as shown in Figure 3. As expected, at different drying temperatures and air velocity of 1.0 ms−1, the highest level of catalase activity in Sindri (31.63–81.17 µmol·min−1·g−1), SB Chaunsa (39.29–73.67 µmol·min−1·g−1), and TA (6.22–23.62 µmol·min−1·g−1) was retained in the product dried at 40 °C. However, when using higher drying temperatures of 50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, and 80 °C, the activity retention of catalase decreased significantly (p < 0.05). Particularly, at drying temperatures of 70 °C and 80 °C, most of the catalase activity was lost, presumably by denaturation of the enzyme. The least retention of catalase (0.00–5.71 µmol·min−1·g−1) was noticed in samples dried at 80 °C. Vega-Gálvez et al. [17] reported that during drying of fruits, the cellular damage is less at a lower temperature while at higher temperatures, thermal destruction predominates and weakens the cell tissues. Therefore, drying at high temperatures causes more destruction of heat-sensitive enzymes.
Table 1.
Mango Varieties Fresh Samples | Drying Duration (Min) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brix | MC | aw | 40 °C | 50 °C | 60 °C | 70 °C | 80 °C | ||||||
(% wb) | 1.0 ms−1 | 1.4 ms−1 | 1.0 ms−1 | 1.4 ms−1 | 1.0 ms−1 | 1.4 ms−1 | 1.0 ms−1 | 1.4 ms−1 | 1.0 ms−1 | 1.4 ms−1 | |||
Sindri | 17.33 b ± 1.71 | 86.96 b ± 2.05 | 0.922 b ± 0.012 | 915 ± 28.99 | 750 ± 26.87 | 660 ± 23.33 | 540 ± 20.51 | 465 ± 17.68 | 410 ± 16.97 | 350 ± 15.56 | 300 ± 12.73 | 280 ± 10.61 | 250 ± 9.90 |
SB Chaunsa | 20.69 a ± 1.46 | 82.12 c ± 2.62 | 0.920 b ± 0.010 | 1155 ± 36.77 | 960 ± 31.11 | 750 ± 28.28 | 615 ± 25.46 | 540 ± 22.63 | 465 ± 21.21 | 390 ± 18.38 | 330 ± 16.26 | 310 ± 13.44 | 280 ± 11.31 |
Tommy Atkins | 13.95 c ± 2.81 | 89.08 a ± 2.22 | 0.937 a ± 0.012 | 825 ± 26.16 | 705 ± 24.04 | 570 ± 21.92 | 465 ± 19.80 | 410 ± 14.14 | 360 ± 14.85 | 310 ± 12.73 | 270 ± 12.02 | 240 ± 7.78 | 210 ± 8.49 |
Data of fresh samples are presented as mean (n = 20 × 3) ± standard deviation; a–c values with different letters in a column indicate significantly different (Tukey’s HSD test, p < 0.05). Drying duration values are provided in duplication.
The experimental results also highlighted that the tendency to activity retention of catalase in dried mango changed as the drying-air velocity was raised to 1.4 ms−1. Drying at a lower temperature of 40 °C and an air velocity of 1.4 ms−1 can save 10.64% to 40.62% more enzyme units compared to the samples dried at an air velocity of 1.0 ms−1. A significant difference was noticed in SB Chaunsa while in Sindri and Tommy Atkins the enzyme units were insignificantly higher. This might be attributed to the fact that a higher air velocity decreases the drying time at the same drying temperature (Table 1). Similar observations about influence of air velocity in decreasing drying time were also reported by Putra and Ajiwiguna [8]. The activity of heat-sensitive enzymes is also directly related to heat treatment time [45]. As a result, drying at a low temperature of 40 °C and an air velocity of 1.4 ms−1 retained more enzyme units. Thus, to preserve the maximum activity of the heat-sensitive enzymes in dried mango, the drying temperature and air velocity are both important parameters to be considered.
Many researchers have also reported that drying fruits at low temperatures could have a beneficial impact on the preservation of the structure [46], flavor [14], protein [47], antioxidants [48], ascorbic acid [49,50], and total phenolic compounds [22,51]. Catalase is believed to be a key antioxidant enzyme in the human body’s defense against oxidative stress [52]. Preservation of this enzyme in dried mango is of great importance because of its strong antioxidant properties [6]. By preserving the heat-sensitive enzyme (catalase) in dried fruit, it might also be possible to preserve other nutritional components described. Instead of measuring a variety of quality parameters, catalase activity in dried mango could be used as an indicator of quality deterioration due to excessive heat exposure during drying. It has also been documented in a previous study that hot air drying is economically more viable compared to other drying methods like freeze-drying [53]. Therefore, the use of hot air drying to preserve active enzyme units in dehydrated mango might provide an extra advantage to minimize its drying costs.
2.4. Drying Kinetics of Catalase Activity
For a better understanding of the catalase degradation rate, the residual catalase activity during mango drying was evaluated in the variety Sindri. The results are displayed in Figure 4a,b.
At a constant air velocity of 1.0 ms−1, the drying temperatures 40 °C, 60 °C, and 80 °C exhibited a destruction rate kd of 0.00071, 0.00273, and 0.00751 min−1, respectively. The degradation rate accelerated 3.84-fold during drying at 60 °C and 10.58-fold at 80 °C, compared to 40 °C. Similar explanations regarding enzyme inactivation at different temperatures were also found in previous studies [33,54,55]. In addition, when drying at 40 °C, 60 °C, and 80 °C, an increase in air velocity of 1.4 ms−1 increased the destruction rate kd by 8.77–31.42%. These results can be well explained by Figure 4c,d. At an air velocity of 1.4 ms−1, the product reached its target temperature faster, and higher surface and internal temperatures were observed compared to an air velocity of 1.0 ms−1. Vega-Gálvez et al. [17] also reported that the heat diffusion capacity of a high air velocity was more pronounced than that for a low one and therefore drying at an air velocity of 1.4 ms−1 causes a higher destruction of enzymes. These findings were further clarified by comparing the Arrhenius plot of deactivation energy (Ed) for both, 1.0 ms−1 and 1.4 ms−1 air velocity (Figure 4b). Air velocity of 1.4 ms−1 exhibited a 2.41% higher Ed value of catalase compared to a 1.0 ms−1 air velocity, which confirms a higher enzyme destruction at high air velocities. However, these findings are in contradiction to our results as explained in Figure 3, where the maximum catalase activity was retained in mango samples dried at 40 °C and an air velocity of 1.4 ms−1. This is because of the fact that the activity of heat-sensitive enzyme (catalase) is also directly related to the heat treatment time. Drying at 40 °C and an air velocity of 1.4 ms−1 required less time (120–195 min) to dry up to the target moisture content compared to a 1.0 ms−1 air velocity (Table 1). Thus, drying at a low temperature of 40 °C and an air velocity of 1.4 ms−1 was successful in saving more enzyme units, although the destruction rate was comparatively higher than the air velocity 1.0 ms−1. Consequently, catalase activity is directly affected by the drying air temperature, velocity, and heat treatment time. Therefore, its activity can be used as a control parameter to predict changes and improve the drying operations.
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Mango Varieties
Fresh, medium ripe mango (Mangifera indica L.) in export quality of the varieties Sindri and Samar Bahisht (SB) Chaunsa were harvested in Khanewal, Pakistan (30°20′13.9″ N, 71°54′35.0″ E) and transported by air to Germany. In addition, fruits of the variety Tommy Atkins were obtained from a local market in Stuttgart, Germany. During experiments, the mangoes were stored under refrigeration at a temperature of 11 ± 1 °C for not more than six weeks.
3.2. Enzyme Activity Assays
3.2.1. Catalase
The catalase activity was determined by the megazyme assay kit (K-CATAL, Romer Labs GmbH, Butzbach, Germany). A decrease in H2O2 concentration was observed following an incubation of the extracted mango samples with a H2O2 standard solution. The reaction was stopped by adding 15 mmol sodium azide, which strongly inhibits catalase. The remaining concentration of H2O2 was measured using an enzyme-linked colorimetric detection method employing 3,5-dichloro-2-hydroxy-benzenesulfonic acid (DHBS), 4-aminoantipyrine (AAP), and peroxidase. The resulting quinoneimine dye was measured at 520 nm by a spectrophotometer (DR-6000, Hach Lange GmbH, Berlin, Germany).
One unit of catalase activity is defined as the amount of enzymes required to decompose 1 μmol of H2O2 per min per gram of sample at 25 °C.
3.2.2. Polyphenol Oxidase (PPO)
PPO activity was measured as described by Liu et al. [56]. In this method, a catechol solution (0.175 M) was used as a substrate because catechol oxidizes PPO is located in mango skin, sap, and pulp [57]. For the PPO activity assay, 2.5 mL of a freshly prepared catechol solution was mixed with 500 µL of the enzyme extract and incubated at 30 °C for 3 min. Then it was immediately transferred into a cuvette and the change in absorbance was measured at 495 nm by using a spectrophotometer (DR-6000, Hach Lange GmbH, Berlin, Germany). One unit of PPO activity was calculated by an increase in the absorbance of 0.001 per min per gram of sample at 30 °C.
3.2.3. Amylase
Amylase activity was assayed according to the method described by Zakir et al. [58]. One percent (w/v) starch solution was used as a substrate. For the amylase activity assay, 2.9 mL starch solution was mixed with 100 µL of enzyme extract and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 1 mL of 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid. Subsequent heating in boiling water for 5 min completed the reaction. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool for 15 min at room temperature and 9 mL of water was added to make a dilution. The mixture absorbance was measured at 540 nm by a spectrophotometer (DR-6000, Hach Lange GmbH, Berlin, Germany). The enzyme activity was measured by estimating the release of maltose calculated from the standard curve prepared by using maltose at concentrations of (0–6 mg·mL−1). One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzymes required to release 1 mg of maltose per min per gram of sample at 37 °C.
3.2.4. Invertase
Invertase activity was evaluated by estimating the release of glucose calculated from the standard curve prepared with different concentrations of glucose [58]. One percent (w/v) sucrose solution was used as a substrate. For the invertase activity assay, 2.9 mL of sucrose solution and 100 µl of enzyme extract were mixed and incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. The reaction was terminated by adding 1 mL of 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid followed by heating in boiling water for 5 min to complete the reaction. After cooling at room temperature for 15 min, the mixture was diluted by adding 9 mL of water. The absorbance was recorded at 575 nm by a spectrophotometer (DR-6000, Hach Lange GmbH, Berlin, Germany) and the enzyme activity was calculated by comparing the standard curve prepared by using glucose at concentrations of (0–2.5 mg·mL−1). One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzymes required to release 1 mg of glucose per min per gram of sample at 37 °C.
3.3. Incubation Trials to Determine the Heat-Sensitivity of Enzymes in Fresh Mango
The heat-sensitivity of the enzymes catalase, polyphenol oxidase (PPO), amylase, and invertase was investigated in fresh mango of the variety SB Chaunsa. The enzymes were extracted according to the modified method of Ndiaye et al. [36]. Eighteen mangoes were randomly selected and divided equally into three batches. Six extractions were prepared from each batch by mixing the flesh of six different mangoes. The fruits were cut into small pieces and homogenized with a vortex mixer (Polytron 2500E, Kinematica, Luzern, Switzerland). Next, 10 g (~1.8 g dry matter) of homogenate was transferred into each falcon tube adding 10 mL of extraction buffer (0.1 M Potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0). After mixing, the samples were further centrifuged (Z326K, HERMLE Labortechnik GmbH, Wehingen, Germany) at 13,400 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were collected and run separately in triplicates to test the activity of enzymes after 10 min incubation at temperatures from 25 °C to 85 °C for catalase and 30 °C to 80 °C for PPO, amylase, and invertase. The temperature selection for the incubation trials was based on the optimal temperature range found in the literature. For instance, this optimum temperature range is stated to be between 25 and 50 °C for catalase [59], 30 and 50 °C for PPO [60], 40 and 70 °C for amylase [61], and 40 and 60 °C for invertase [62,63].
3.4. Hot Air Convective Thin-Layer Drying of Mango Slabs
The hot air drying experiments were carried out by using a laboratory convection dryer designed at the Institute of Agricultural Engineering, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany [64], which allows a highly accurate control of the drying air temperature, humidity, and velocity. Prior to drying experiments, the average initial moisture content, degree brix, and water activity were analyzed in fresh mangoes (Table 1). The moisture content was determined by an oven method at 105 °C overnight [65], degree brix was measured by digital refractometer (ATAGO PR-201 palette, ATAGO Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and water activity using a hygrometer (Rotronic A2, Rotronic AG, Basserdorf, Switzerland) at 23 °C after 30 min of stability.
For drying, the mangoes were sliced in 4 cm × 2 cm × 0.8 cm pieces using a stainless-steel knife and a food dicer (MultiSchneider Serano 7, Ritter, Groebenzell, Germany). All the experiments were done in duplicates by using the overflow chamber of the dryer at 40 °C, 50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, and 80 °C, maintaining a constant specific humidity of 10 g kg−1 at air velocities of 1.0 ms−1 and 1.4 ms−1. The system was warmed up for 60 min to achieve constant drying conditions for the desired set points. An infrared thermometer (IR 260-8S, Voltcraft, Hirschau, Germany) was used to measure the fruit surface temperature at three different locations, while two thermocouple sensors (Mantel-Thermoelemente GTF 101, GHM Messtechnik GmbH, Regenstauf, Germany) of 0.5 mm in diameter were inserted to the center of the fruit slabs to record the inner temperature of the fruit during drying. The samples with initial mass of 330 ± 30 g were dried and weighed automatically at regular intervals of 15 min until the target moisture content of approximately 11% wet basis was achieved. This moisture content is equivalent to the hygienically safe water activity aw ≤ 0.6. The time required for each of the drying experiments are also presented in Table 1. The dried mango slices were cooled, packed airtight in polyethylene bags, and stored in a dark place at room temperature for further analysis for a maximum period of two months.
3.5. Measurement of Enzyme Activity in Fresh and Dried Mango
Activity of heat-sensitive enzymes, identified in Section 3.3, was measured in fresh and dried samples of the varieties Sindri, SB Chaunsa, and Tommy Atkins, taking 120 mangoes per variety. For all three varieties, twenty extractions were prepared for each of the fresh and dried samples. For the preparation of each extraction from fresh samples, the flesh from six different mangoes was randomly selected and the supernatant was collected by following the same procedure as described in Section 3.3. However, for the dried samples, dried slices from the same treatment were randomly selected, cut into small pieces, and mixed well with the help of a homogenizer. Afterwards, 1.96 g (~1.8 g dry matter) of dried samples were mixed with 10 mL of extraction buffer and centrifuged under the previously described conditions (Section 3.3). The supernatant was collected and run separately in triplicates to test the enzymatic activity.
3.6. Modeling of Enzyme Activity Kinetics during Drying
Kinetic modeling describes the residual enzyme activity as a function of drying time and can be used to predict changes in product quality during drying. To measure the residual enzyme activity during drying, the samples were collected at regular 2-h-intervals at 40 °C and for 1-h-intervals at 60 °C and 80 °C. The enzyme degradations were expressed by a first-order kinetic model [66,67]:
A/Ao = exp (−kd × t), | (1) |
where A is the residual activity after the treatment time t (min), Ao is the initial activity, and kd is the deactivation or destruction rate constant (min−1). The deactivation rate constant (kd) is temperature dependent according to the Arrhenius equation [54]:
kd = kdo × exp (−Ed/RT), | (2) |
where kd is the deactivation rate constant at the process temperature (min−1), kdo is the pre exponential factor, Ed is the energy of deactivations (J·mol−1), R is the universal gas constant 8.314 (J·mol−1·K−1), and T is the absolute temperature in (K).
3.7. Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis was done by using the IBM statistical package SPSS 22.0. Mean differences in the treatments were tested for significance level (α = 0.05) using the ANOVA and Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) method. The data were plotted by using Origin Pro 2020 (OriginLab Co., Northampton, MA, USA).
4. Conclusions
The combined effect of different drying temperatures and air velocities on the activity retention of the heat-sensitive enzymes catalase and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) in dried mango was observed. Results proved that the drying temperature had the greatest influence on the catalase degradation rate with some impact of the air velocity. Drying should be performed at a low temperature and a high air velocity in order to preserve the maximum enzyme units in dried mango. At the same time, however, drying at a lower temperature also preserved the maximum PPO units susceptible to color deterioration. Therefore, the dried mango should be stored at a proper place after adequate packaging. Alternatively, drying at higher temperatures with a high air velocity caused a drastic reduction of enzyme activity. These results highlight new possibilities to use catalase activity to compare drying temperatures and to optimize the drying technique. Moreover, the residual enzyme units in dried samples can be used as a new parameter to evaluate the quality of dried mango. Lately, industries have shown increased interest to find an optimum drying temperature to produce dried fruit with a good stability and high enzyme content. This study suggests the suitable temperature and air velocity to reduce enzyme destruction in dried mango products. Further research should be performed on the effect of storage time and packaging materials on enzyme stability. In addition, the correlation of enzyme activity with changes in heat-sensitive nutrients of mango during convective drying and the influence of maturity on enzyme activity needs to be investigated.
Acknowledgments
We are thankful to our lab team, Institute of Agricultural Engineering (440e), Tropics and Subtropics Group, for their technical support and Sabine Nugent for language editing.
Appendix A
Table A1.
Temperature | Mean Difference | Std. Error | Sig. | 95% Confidence Interval | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower Bound | Upper Bound | |||||
30 °C | 40 °C | 3.0372 | 2.83829 | 0.892 | −5.2069 | 11.2814 |
50 °C | 8.0367 | 2.83829 | 0.060 | −0.2075 | 16.2808 | |
60 °C | 9.6667 * | 2.83829 | 0.012 | 1.4225 | 17.9108 | |
70 °C | 10.3822 * | 2.83829 | 0.005 | 2.1381 | 18.6264 | |
80 °C | 12.1972 * | 2.83829 | 0.001 | 3.9531 | 20.4414 | |
40 °C | 30 °C | −3.0372 | 2.83829 | 0.892 | −11.2814 | 5.2069 |
50 °C | 4.9994 | 2.83829 | 0.495 | −3.2447 | 13.2436 | |
60 °C | 6.6294 | 2.83829 | 0.190 | −1.6147 | 14.8736 | |
70 °C | 7.3450 | 2.83829 | 0.110 | −0.8991 | 15.5891 | |
80 °C | 9.1600 * | 2.83829 | 0.020 | 0.9159 | 17.4041 | |
50 °C | 30 °C | −8.0367 | 2.83829 | 0.060 | −16.2808 | 0.2075 |
40 °C | −4.9994 | 2.83829 | 0.495 | −13.2436 | 3.2447 | |
60 °C | 1.6300 | 2.83829 | 0.992 | −6.6141 | 9.8741 | |
70 °C | 2.3456 | 2.83829 | 0.962 | −5.8986 | 10.5897 | |
80 °C | 4.1606 | 2.83829 | 0.687 | −4.0836 | 12.4047 | |
60 °C | 30 °C | −9.6667 * | 2.83829 | 0.012 | −17.9108 | −1.4225 |
40 °C | −6.6294 | 2.83829 | 0.190 | −14.8736 | 1.6147 | |
50 °C | −1.6300 | 2.83829 | 0.992 | −9.8741 | 6.6141 | |
70 °C | 0.7156 | 2.83829 | 1.000 | −7.5286 | 8.9597 | |
80 °C | 2.5306 | 2.83829 | 0.948 | −5.7136 | 10.7747 | |
70 °C | 30 °C | −10.3822 * | 2.83829 | 0.005 | −18.6264 | −2.1381 |
40 °C | −7.3450 | 2.83829 | 0.110 | −15.5891 | 0.8991 | |
50 °C | −2.3456 | 2.83829 | 0.962 | −10.5897 | 5.8986 | |
60 °C | −0.7156 | 2.83829 | 1.000 | −8.9597 | 7.5286 | |
80 °C | 1.8150 | 2.83829 | 0.988 | −6.4291 | 10.0591 | |
80 °C | 30 °C | −12.1972 * | 2.83829 | 0.001 | −20.4414 | −3.9531 |
40 °C | −9.1600 * | 2.83829 | 0.020 | −17.4041 | −0.9159 | |
50 °C | −4.1606 | 2.83829 | 0.687 | −12.4047 | 4.0836 | |
60 °C | −2.5306 | 2.83829 | 0.948 | −10.7747 | 5.7136 | |
70 °C | −1.8150 | 2.83829 | 0.988 | −10.0591 | 6.4291 |
Significance level *, indicate the p-values < 0.05 (Tukey HSD test).
Table A2.
Temperature | Mean Difference | Std. Error | Sig. | 95% Confidence Interval | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower Bound | Upper Bound | |||||
25 °C | 35 °C | 6.8794 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | 4.5100 | 9.2489 |
45 °C | 9.1500 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | 6.7805 | 11.5195 | |
55 °C | 12.2600 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | 9.8905 | 14.6295 | |
65 °C | 27.8828 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | 25.5133 | 30.2523 | |
75 °C | 28.9306 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | 26.5611 | 31.3000 | |
85 °C | 30.8728 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | 28.5033 | 33.2423 | |
35 °C | 25 °C | −6.8794 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | −9.2489 | −4.5100 |
45 °C | 2.2706 | 0.78998 | 0.070 | −0.0989 | 4.6400 | |
55 °C | 5.3806 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | 3.0111 | 7.7500 | |
65 °C | 21.0033 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | 18.6339 | 23.3728 | |
75 °C | 22.0511 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | 19.6816 | 24.4206 | |
85 °C | 23.9933 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | 21.6239 | 26.3628 | |
45 °C | 25 °C | −9.1500 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | −11.5195 | −6.7805 |
35 °C | −2.2706 | 0.78998 | 0.070 | −4.6400 | 0.0989 | |
55 °C | 3.1100 * | 0.78998 | 0.003 | 0.7405 | 5.4795 | |
65 °C | 18.7328 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | 16.3633 | 21.1023 | |
75 °C | 19.7806 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | 17.4111 | 22.1500 | |
85 °C | 21.7228 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | 19.3533 | 24.0923 | |
55 °C | 25 °C | −12.2600 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | −14.6295 | −9.8905 |
35 °C | −5.3806 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | −7.7500 | −3.0111 | |
45 °C | −3.1100 * | 0.78998 | 0.003 | −5.4795 | −0.7405 | |
65 °C | 15.6228 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | 13.2533 | 17.9923 | |
75 °C | 16.6706 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | 14.3011 | 19.0400 | |
85 °C | 18.6128 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | 16.2433 | 20.9823 | |
65 °C | 25 °C | −27.8828 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | −30.2523 | −25.5133 |
35 °C | −21.0033 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | −23.3728 | −18.6339 | |
45 °C | −18.7328 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | −21.1023 | −16.3633 | |
55 °C | −15.6228 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | −17.9923 | −13.2533 | |
75 °C | 1.0478 | 0.78998 | 0.838 | −1.3217 | 3.4173 | |
85 °C | 2.9900 * | 0.78998 | 0.004 | 0.6205 | 5.3595 | |
75 °C | 25 °C | −28.9306 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | −31.3000 | −26.5611 |
35 °C | −22.0511 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | −24.4206 | −19.6816 | |
45 °C | −19.7806 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | −22.1500 | −17.4111 | |
55 °C | −16.6706 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | −19.0400 | −14.3011 | |
65 °C | −1.0478 | 0.78998 | 0.838 | −3.4173 | 1.3217 | |
85 °C | 1.9422 | 0.78998 | 0.184 | −0.4273 | 4.3117 | |
85 °C | 25 °C | −30.8728 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | −33.2423 | −28.5033 |
35 °C | −23.9933 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | −26.3628 | −21.6239 | |
45 °C | −21.7228 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | −24.0923 | −19.3533 | |
55 °C | −18.6128 * | 0.78998 | 0.000 | −20.9823 | −16.2433 | |
65 °C | −2.9900 * | 0.78998 | 0.004 | −5.3595 | −0.6205 | |
75 °C | −1.9422 | 0.78998 | 0.184 | −4.3117 | 0.4273 |
Significance level *, indicate the p-values < 0.05 (Tukey HSD test).
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.M., S.L., and J.M.; methodology, A.M.; software, A.M.; validation, A.M., S.L., and J.M.; formal analysis, A.M., S.L., and J.M.; investigation, A.M.; resources, A.M., S.L., and J.M.; data curation, A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.; writing—review and editing, A.M., S.L., and J.M.; visualization, A.M.; supervision, S.L. and J.M.; project administration, A.M., S.L., and J.M.; funding acquisition, A.M. and S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by a Faculty grant (PS-2(11)FDP/15/22241) from the University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Tharanathan R.N., Yashoda H.M., Prabha T.N. Mango (Mangifera indica L.), “The king of fruits”—An overview. Food Rev. Int. 2006;22:95–123. doi: 10.1080/87559120600574493. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.FAO Food and Agriculture Commodities Production. [(accessed on 4 June 2020)];2018 Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.
- 3.Mitra S.K. Mango production in the world—Present situation and future prospect. Acta Hortic. 2016;1111:287–296. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1111.41. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Niranjana P., Gopalakrishna K., Sudhakar D., Madhusudhan B. Effect of pre-cooling and heat treatment on antioxidant enzymes profile of mango and banana. Afr. J. Food Agric. Nutr. Dev. 2009;9:1210–1225. doi: 10.4314/ajfand.v9i5.45097. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hossain M.A., Rana M.M., Kimura Y., Roslan H.A. Changes in biochemical characteristics and activities of ripening associated enzymes in mango fruit during the storage at different temperatures. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014;14:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2014/232969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Matés J.M., Pérez-Gómez C., de Castro I.N. Antioxidant enzymes and human diseases. Clin. Biochem. 1999;32:595–603. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9120(99)00075-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Janiak M.C. Digestive enzymes of human and nonhuman primates. Evol. Anthropol. 2016;25:253–266. doi: 10.1002/evan.21498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Putra R.N., Ajiwiguna T.A. Influence of air temperature and velocity for drying process. Procedia Eng. 2017;170:516–519. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Elamin O.M.A. Effect of drying temperature on some quality attributes of mango slices. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. 2014;4:91–99. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kowalski S.J., Łechtańska J.M., Szadzińska J. Quality aspects of fruit and vegetables dried convectively with osmotic pretreatment. Chem. Process Eng. 2013;34:51–62. doi: 10.2478/cpe-2013-0005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mercer D. A comparison of the kinetics of mango drying in open-air, solar, and forced-air dryers. Afr. J. Food Agric. Nutr. 2013;12:6835–6852. doi: 10.4314/ajfand.v12i7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kanyinda J.N.M. Comparison of two drying methods of mango (oven and solar drying) MOJ Food Process. Technol. 2017;5:1–4. doi: 10.15406/mojfpt.2017.05.00118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.López J., Uribe E., Vega-Gálvez A., Miranda M., Vergara J., Gonzalez E., Di Scala K. Effect of air temperature on drying kinetics, vitamin c, antioxidant activity, total phenolic content, non-enzymatic browning and firmness of blueberries variety óneil. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2010;3:772–777. doi: 10.1007/s11947-009-0306-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Leite J.B., Mancini M.C., Borges S.V. Effect of drying temperature on the quality of dried bananas cv. prata and d’água. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2007;40:319–323. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2005.08.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Maskan M. Drying, shrinkage and rehydration characteristics of kiwifruits during hot air and microwave drying. J. Food Eng. 2001;48:177–182. doi: 10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00155-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Udomkun P., Argyropoulos D., Nagle M., Mahayothee B., Janjai S., Müller J. Single layer drying kinetics of papaya amidst vertical and horizontal airflow. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2015;64:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.05.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vega-Gálvez A., Ah-Hen K., Chacana M., Vergara J., Martínez-Monzó J., García-Segovia P., Lemus-Mondaca R., di Scala K. Effect of temperature and air velocity on drying kinetics, antioxidant capacity, total phenolic content, colour, texture and microstructure of apple (var. Granny Smith) slices. Food Chem. 2012;132:51–59. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Guarte R.C., Pott I., Mühlbauer W. Influence of drying parameters on β-carotene retention in mango leather. Fruits. 2005;60:255–265. doi: 10.1051/fruits:2005032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Russo P., Adiletta G., Matteo M.D., Farina V., Corona O., Cinquanta L. Drying kinetics and physico-chemical quality of mango slices. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2019;75:109–114. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Adepoju L.A., Osunde Z.D. Effect of pretreatments and drying methods on some qualities of dried mango (Mangifera indica) fruit. Agric. Eng. Int. CIGR J. 2017;19:187–194. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Omolola A.O., Jideani A.I.O., Kapila P.F. Quality properties of fruits as affected by drying operation. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017;57:95–108. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2013.859563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Izli N., Izli G., Taskin O. Influence of different drying techniques on drying parameters of mango. Food Sci. Technol. 2017;37:604–612. doi: 10.1590/1678-457x.28316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sehrawat R., Nema P.K.P.K., Kaur B.P.B.P. Quality evaluation and drying characteristics of mango cubes dried using low-pressure superheated steam, vacuum and hot air drying methods. LWT. 2018;92:548–555. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.03.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yao L., Fan L., Duan Z. Effect of different pretreatments followed by hot-air and far-infrared drying on the bioactive compounds, physicochemical property and microstructure of mango slices. Food Chem. 2020;305:125477. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mattoo A.K., Modi V.V. Ethylene and ripening of mangoes. Plant Physiol. 1969;44:308–310. doi: 10.1104/pp.44.2.308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cheema S., Sommerhalter M. Characterization of polyphenol oxidase activity in Ataulfo mango. Food Chem. 2015;171:382–387. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.De Lima L.C.O., Chitarra A.B., Chitarra M.I.F. Changes in amylase activity starch and sugars contents in mango fruits pulp Cv. Tommy Atkins with spongy tissue. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2001;44:59–62. doi: 10.1590/S1516-89132001000100008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Castrillo M., Kruger N.J., Whatley F.R. Sucrose metabolism in mango fruit during ripening. Plant Sci. 1992;84:45–51. doi: 10.1016/0168-9452(92)90206-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mehrnoush A., Mohd Yazid A.M. Characterization of novel amylase enzyme from mango (Mangifera indica cv. Chokanan) peel. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2013;11:47–50. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Alegre A., Polizeli M.D.L., Terenzi H., Jorge J., Guimarães L. Production of thermostable invertases by Aspergillus caespitosus under submerged or solid state fermentation using agroindustrial residues as carbon source. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2009;40:612–622. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822009000300025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Holderbaum D.F. Enzymatic browning, polyphenol oxidase activity, and polyphenols in four apple cultivars: Dynamics during fruit development. HortScience. 2010;45:1150–1154. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.45.8.1150. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Korbel E., Servent A., Billaud C., Brat P. Heat inactivation of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase as a function of water activity: A case study of mango drying. Dry. Technol. 2013;31:1675–1680. doi: 10.1080/07373937.2013.808659. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Illera A.E., Sanz M.T., Benito-Román O., Varona S., Beltrán S., Melgosa R., Solaesa A.G. Effect of thermosonication batch treatment on enzyme inactivation kinetics and other quality parameters of cloudy apple juice. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2018;47:71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2018.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang C.Y. Effect of temperature preconditioning on catalase, peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase in chilled zucchini squash. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 1995;5:67–76. doi: 10.1016/0925-5214(94)00020-S. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vishwasrao C., Ananthanarayan L. Kinetics of inactivation of quality-deteriorating enzymes and degradation of selective phytoconstituents in pink guava pulp during thermal processing. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018;55:3273–3280. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3262-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ndiaye C., Xu S.Y., Wang Z. Steam blanching effect on polyphenoloxidase, peroxidase and colour of mango (Mangifera indica L.) slices. Food Chem. 2009;113:92–95. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.07.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Andrade N., Araújo J.R., Correia-Branco A., Carletti J.V., Martel F. Effect of dietary polyphenols on fructose uptake by human intestinal epithelial (Caco-2) cells. J. Funct. Foods. 2017;36:429–439. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2017.07.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lule S.U., Xia W. Food phenolics, pros and cons: A review. Food Rev. Int. 2005;21:367–388. doi: 10.1080/87559120500222862. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Calhau C., Faria A., Keating E., Martel F. Interaction of polyphenols with the Intestinal and Placental absorption of some nutrients and other compounds. Polyphen. Hum. Health Dis. 2013;1:523–536. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Selvarajan E., Veena R., Manoj Kumar N. Polyphenol oxidase, beyond enzyme browning. Microb. Bioprospect. Sustain. Dev. 2018:203–222. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-0053-0_10. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Esposito E., Durán N. Potential applications of oxidative enzymes and phenoloxidase-like compounds in wastewater and soil treatment: A review. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2000;28:83–99. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Boonyaritthongchai P., Supapvanich S., Wongaree C., Uthairatanakij A., Jitareerat P., Pongprasert N., Kaewmanee N. Application of natural extracts from pineapple juice on inhibiting browning symptom of fresh-cut “Nam Dok Mai” mango. Acta Hortic. 2018;1210:235–240. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1210.33. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mondal K., Malhotra S.P., Jain V., Singh R. Oxidative stress and antioxidant systems in Guava (Psidium guajava L.) fruits during ripening. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants. 2009;15:327–334. doi: 10.1007/s12298-009-0037-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ranjan S., Mallik A.K. A study of the catalase reaction, with special reference to respiration in plants. New Phytol. 1931;30:355. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1931.tb07427.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Peterson M.E., Daniel R.M., Danson M.J., Eisenthal R. The dependence of enzyme activity on temperature: Determination and validation of parameters. Biochem. J. 2007;402:331–337. doi: 10.1042/BJ20061143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chong C.H., Law C.L., Cloke M., Hii C.L., Abdullah L.C., Daud W.R.W. Drying kinetics and product quality of dried Chempedak. J. Food Eng. 2008;88:522–527. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.03.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Guiné R.P.F., Fernandes R.M.C. Analysis of the drying kinetics of chestnuts. J. Food Eng. 2006;76:460–467. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.04.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Vinson J.A., Zubik L., Bose P., Samman N., Proch J. Dried fruits: Excellent in vitro and in vivo antioxidants. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2005;24:44–50. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2005.10719442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Djendoubi Mrad N., Boudhrioua N., Kechaou N., Courtois F., Bonazzi C. Influence of air drying temperature on kinetics, physicochemical properties, total phenolic content and ascorbic acid of pears. Food Bioprod. Process. 2012;90:433–441. doi: 10.1016/j.fbp.2011.11.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Erenturk S., Gulaboglu M.S., Gultekin S. The effects of cutting and drying medium on the vitamin C content of rosehip during drying. J. Food Eng. 2005;68:513–518. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.07.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bennett L.E., Jegasothy H., Konczak I., Frank D., Sudharmarajan S., Clingeleffer P.R. Total polyphenolics and anti-oxidant properties of selected dried fruits and relationships to drying conditions. J. Funct. Foods. 2011;3:115–124. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2011.03.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Nandi A., Yan L.J., Jana C.K., Das N. Role of catalase in oxidative stress and age associated degenerative diseases. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019 doi: 10.1155/2019/9613090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ratti C. Hot air and freeze-drying of high-value foods: A review. J. Food Eng. 2001;49:311–319. doi: 10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00228-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.De Jesus S.S., Maciel Filho R. Drying of α-amylase by spray drying and freeze-drying—A comparative study. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2014;31:625–631. doi: 10.1590/0104-6632.20140313s00002642. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bassetti F.J., Bergamasco R., Moraes F.F., Zanin G.M. Thermal stability and deactivation energy of free and immobilized invertase. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2000;17:867–872. doi: 10.1590/S0104-66322000000400050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Liu H., Jiang W., Bi Y., Luo Y. Postharvest BTH treatment induces resistance of peach (Prunus persica L. cv. Jiubao) fruit to infection by Penicillium expansum and enhances activity of fruit defense mechanisms. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2005;35:263–269. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.08.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Vamos-Vigyázó L. Polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase in fruits and vegetables. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1981;15:49–127. doi: 10.1080/10408398109527312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zakir H.M., Fardush J., Hossain M.S., Islam M.Z., Shariar S.M.S., Rokshana K., Hossian M. Effects of storage temperatures on different biochemical characteristics of 1-methylcyclopropene treated mango (Mangifera Indica L.) variety Khirshapat. Am. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018;6:76–82. doi: 10.12691/AJFST-6-2-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Doǧaç Y.I., Çinar M., Teke M. Improving of catalase stability properties by encapsulation in alginate/Fe3O4 magnetic composite beads for enzymatic removal of H2O2. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015;45:144–157. doi: 10.1080/10826068.2014.907178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zhang X., Shao X. Characterisation of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase and the role in browning of Loquat fruit. Czech J. Food Sci. 2016;33:109–117. doi: 10.17221/384/2014-CJFS. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Cordeiro C.A.M., Martins M.L.L., Luciano A.B. Production and properties of alpha-amylase from thermophilic Bacillus sp. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2002;33:57–61. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822002000100012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Effect of pH and Temperature on the Rate of Reaction Catalysed by Yeast Invertase (Sucrase)|Fresh Nutrition. [(accessed on 4 November 2020)]; Available online: https://savannajackson.wordpress.com/2016/06/16/effect-of-ph-and-temperature-on-the-rate-of-reaction-catalysed-by-yeast-invertase-sucrase/
- 63.Nurul Izzah A. Bachelor Thesis. University Malaysia Pahang; Pekan, Malaysia: 2013. Characterization and Thermostability Study of Invertase by Aspergillus niger in Submerged Culture. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Argyropoulos D., Heindl A., Müller J. Assessment of convection, hot-air combined with microwave-vacuum and freeze-drying methods for mushrooms with regard to product quality. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011;46:333–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02500.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.AOAC Int . Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. AOAC Int.; Arlington, VA, USA: 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Segel I.H. Enzyme Kinetics. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2013. pp. 216–220. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Li R., Shang H., Wu H., Wang M., Duan M., Yang J. Thermal inactivation kinetics and effects of drying methods on the phenolic profile and antioxidant activities of chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) leaves. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27874-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]