Abstract
Parenteral nutrition associated cholestasis (PNAC) causes serious morbidity in the neonatal intensive care unit. Infection with gut-associated bacteria is associated with cholestasis, but the role of intestinal microbiota in PNAC is poorly understood. We examined the composition of stool microbiota from premature twins discordant for PNAC as a strategy to reduce confounding from variables associated with both microbiota and cholestasis. Eighty-four serial stool samples were included from four twin sets discordant for PNAC. Random Forests was utilized to determine genera most discriminatory in classifying samples from infants with and without PNAC. In infants with PNAC, we detected a significant increase in the relative abundance of Klebsiella, Veillonella, Enterobacter and Enterococcus (P<0.05). Bray-Curtis dissimilarities in infants with PNAC were significantly different (p<0.05) from infants without PNAC. Our findings warrant further exploration in larger cohorts and experimental models of PNAC to determine if a microbiota signature predicts PNAC, as a basis for future interventions to mitigate liver injury.
Keywords: cholestasis, neonate, parenteral nutrition, microbiota
INTRODUCTION
Parenteral nutrition (PN) is an essential form of nutritional support for premature infants, yet is frequently complicated by its association with liver disease. Preterm infants have increased risk of developing PN associated cholestasis (PNAC) due to immaturity of the hepatobiliary system compounded by lack of enteral feeding1, with cholestasis often persisting after PN cessation.2 Thus PNAC causes significant morbidity in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and beyond.3 Clinical factors associated with PNAC include low birth weight, longer duration of PN, delayed enteral nutrition, antimicrobial administration, gram-negative infections, necrotizing enterocolitis and, gastrointestinal malformations.4
Altering the composition of PN and lipid sparing strategies have shown partial success to prevent or alleviate the development of cholestasis.5 More recently, studies have focused on the role of the intestinal microbiota in the development of PNAC. PN has been associated with altered the intestinal microbiota6, although this can be difficult to separate from the effect of lack of enteral nutrition on the microbiota. Evidence also suggests that cholestasis may be related to the composition of the microbiota.7,8. Bile acids, diminished in cholestasis, normally have an antimicrobial effect on the microbiota; conversely, the intestinal microbiota metabolizes and biotransforms bile acids.8 In adults, perturbations to the intestinal microbiota have been associated with worsening liver function, cirrhosis, and primary biliary cholangitis, with dysbiosis worsening as liver disease progresses.9,10
In a prior study of infants with short bowel syndrome receiving PN, infants who developed PN-associated liver disease displayed less diverse microbiota and a higher abundance of pathogenic bacteria.11 Moreover, infection with gram-negative bacteria, including Escherichia coli urinary tract infections or Klebsiella septicemia, has been associated with the development of cholestasis.9–13
Early enteral feeding has been shown to be the most effective maneuver to prevent the development of cholestasis 14; however, initiation of enteral feeding in the NICU is often restricted by clinical factors. Other targets to decrease the burden of PNAC in the NICU are needed and the intestinal microbiota provides a compelling target. Due to methodological challenges in comparing infants with different genetics, diets, and environments, little is known about changes in the intestinal microbiota associated with PNAC in NICU patients. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate intestinal microbiota composition from serial stool samples of premature twins discordant for PNAC.
METHODS
Subjects and sample collection
Subjects were chosen from a larger cohort in two ongoing neonatal microbiome studies from Level IV NICUs at Inova Fairfax Hospital, Virginia (IRB approval #15–1945) and the University of Virginia (IRB approval #18244). Neonates with an anticipated length of stay over 5 days were recruited. Detailed maternal, pregnancy and delivery data were collected. While in the NICU infants had stool collected at least twice weekly and frozen at −80°C within 12 hours. Detailed data regarding feeding, medications and health status were collected.
Twin sets were selected for discordance for PNAC, i.e., twin pairs simultaneously receiving PN but only one twin developed PNAC. Selected subjects were admitted to the NICU for prematurity only; no subject developed necrotizing enterocolitis. Subjects were not included from the larger cohort if they were singletons, had cholestasis from causes other than PNAC, were admitted to the NICU for causes other than prematurity, had congenital abnormalities or developed necrotizing enterocolitis. PNAC was defined as a direct bilirubin level of ≥1mg/dL, deemed to be caused by PN by the treating physician, with no other apparent causes for cholestasis.15 Tests conducted to screen for other causes of cholestasis included a right upper quadrant ultrasound, Alpha-1 Antitrypsin deficiency testing, urine CMV PCR, urine culture and thyroid stimulating hormone; specific tests conducted varied for each cholestatic subject. Twin sets were chosen as a strategy to reduce potential confounding variables associated with both the microbiota and cholestasis including age, intrauterine environment, genetics (although the environment has been shown to dominate the shaping of the microbiome more than genetics16) and maternal breast milk.
DNA extraction and 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing
Whole stool samples were stored at −80°C until DNA extraction. Prepped samples were loaded on the EZ1 Advanced (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) using the EZ1 Tissue Kit and the Bacterial DNA Extraction protocol card. Samples were cleaned and concentrated using the DNeasy PowerClean Cleanup kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA).
Sequencing libraries were prepared using a Nextera XT kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA) using a modified Illumina 16S Metagenomics Sequencing Library Preparation protocol for analysis of hypervariable region V4. Each sample was sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq with paired-end reads of 301bp. Sequencing of negative controls of lysis buffer and positive controls of Staphylococcus aureus (Strain NCTC 8532, ATCC, VA) and Escherichia coli (Strain NCTC 9001, ATCC, VA) were included. The sequence data are being deposited in NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA).
16S ribosomal RNA gene analysis
Sequence analysis was performed using DADA2 (version 1.6.0).17,18 The forward read was truncated to 200 base pairs and reads with ambiguous ‘N’ bases, and >2 expected errors were filtered out. Chimeras were removed. Taxonomy was assigned using the Ribosomal Database Project’s naïve Bayesian classifier19 with RDP training set 16. Resulting sequence variant counts (SVs) and taxonomic assignments were analyzed using several R packages: Phyloseq (v. 1.22.3), Vegan (v. 2.4.6), GGplot2 (v. 2.2.1), and mice (v. 2.46.0).20,21 Ultralow abundance SVs (<2 raw reads and present in <5% of samples) were removed. Missing values in the metadata were imputed using mice. Benjamini-Hochberg-corrected Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare the alpha diversity and genus relative abundances. A PERNANOVA (Adonis test in the Vegan R package) was used to compare the sample clusters displayed in the non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination plot.
Random Forest model generation
The R package AUCRF (v. 1.1) was used to generate a Random Forest (RF) model to classify the samples according to the disease state from which the individual each sample was sourced. Relative SV counts, agglomerated to the genus taxonomic level, were used to train the RF. During the creation of an optimal RF, 5-fold cross validation with 20% of the data left out for validation was used to assess the fit of the model. The forest used has 1000 trees with a node split (mtry) of 2, and the classes were manually weighted to account for the imbalance between the PNAC and non-PNAC classes. Features were selected by maximizing model accuracy and minimizing the features required for classification. All code is available on Github (https://github.com/Tjmoutinho/PNAC_microbiome).
RESULTS
Demographics and clinical characteristics
A total of 84 serial stool samples were included from 4 twin sets discordant for PNAC. Twins ranged from 25 to 31 weeks gestational age (mean = 27 weeks). All twin sets were delivered by emergency Cesarean Section. Each twin set has one subject that was diagnosed with PNAC for part of the sampling period. Birth weights did not differ between twins who did and did not develop cholestasis (P >> 0.05, Wilcoxon rank sum test); see birth weights in Supplementary Table 1 (Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/MPG/B769). There was no significant difference in antibiotic exposure between twins who did and did not develop cholestasis. Both members from one twin set (Twin set 3) were treated for sepsis, with negative blood and urine cultures, and hence had more days of antibiotic use than the other twin sets. No other subject was diagnosed with sepsis or an infection; all blood cultures drawn on all subjects during the study were negative. Twins who developed cholestasis trended towards being on PN longer than their sibling without cholestasis (Table 1) due to slower tolerance of advancement of enteral feeds or less satisfactory weight gain, although this difference was not significant; however, cholestasis in the affected twin in all twin sets developed while both twins were still on PN. When enteral feeding was started, all subjects received maternal breast milk. Demographic and clinical characteristics of twin sets are listed in Table 1. The range of peak cholestasis in the twins with PNAC was 1.9–10.1mg/dL, mean=5 mg/dL; see hepatic function panel values for subjects in Supplementary Table 2 (Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/MPG/B769).
Table 1:
Demographic and clinical characteristics of twin sets
| Twin Set | Twin with cholestasis | Gestational age at birth | Twin Type | Sex | Days on PN (Twin A/Twin B) | Days of Antibiotics Use (Twin A/Twin B) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A | 28w3d | Di-Di | Female/Female | 24/15 | 2/2 |
| 2 | A | 31w3d | Mono-Di | Male/Male | 14/11 | 0/0 |
| 3 | B | 25w1d | Di-Di | Male/Female | 20/31 | 11/9 |
| 4 | A | 25w1d | Mono-Di | Female/Female | 26/12 | 2/5 |
Di-Di = Dichorionic/Diamniotic. Mono-Di = Monochorionic Diamniotic
PNAC stool samples were different from non-PNAC samples; five significantly differentially abundant genera were driving this difference.
All samples were classified by the clinical PNAC diagnosis at sampling. PNAC and non-PNAC samples cluster separately (p < 0.001, PERMANOVA; Figure 1A). There were five statistically significant differentially abundant genera () between PNAC and non-PNAC samples (P<0.05, corrected Wilcoxon rank-sum; Figure 1B). PNAC was associated with increased levels of gram-negative bacteria Klebsiella, Veillonella and Enterobacter, increased levels of Enterococcus and decreased levels of Escherichia/Shigella. Klebsiella, Enterococcus, and Veillonella have the highest median relative abundances and tended to be more abundant in PNAC samples. Alpha diversity (Shannon index) was not significantly associated with PNAC. In several subjects, the alpha diversity increased with age, but this was not seen in all individuals (Figure 1C). Five genera dominated most samples (Staphylococcus, Escherichia/Shigella, Klebsiella, Veillonella, Enterococcus) consisting of two phyla (Proteobacteria and Firmicutes) (Figure 1D).
Figure 1:
(A) Microbiota 16S rRNA gene sequence data is visualized using NMDS (Bray-Curtis) to compare samples. The PNAC samples cluster is different from the non-PNAC samples cluster (p< 0.001, PERMANOVA). (B) Differentially abundant taxa in samples with and without PNAC are starred (*) (Benjamini-Hochberg corrected P-value<0.05). (C) Alpha diversity (Shannon Diversity Index) was not significantly different between PNAC vs non-PNAC. The sample with the greatest direct bilirubin level per subject is starred (*); the peak direct bilirubin was 1.9mg/dL, 3.4mg/dL, 4.6 mg/dL and 10.1 mg/dL for the cholestatic twin of set 1–4 respectively. (D) Relative abundance of microbial genera is displayed for each sample. (E) AUCRF was used to select the optimal random forest model with the lease number of predictive features. The optimal RF model generated for classifying the microbiota samples had an accuracy of 90%. Using 5-fold cross validation, with 1/5 of the samples for a validation set, the average accuracy was 88%, indicating that the optimal model was not over fit to the dataset. The five microbial features (genera) used in the optimal RF model are displayed. Each feature is listed in order of descending importance to the model.
Random Forest model predicts PNAC based on relative abundance of specific genera.
Feature reductions were performed using AUCRF (Area Under the ROC Curve Random Forest) to identify the microbial features that were predictive of PNAC vs. non-PNAC samples. Feature reduction involved starting with all genera with at least one non-zero median value (Figure 1B). The optimal RF model consisted of five genera and predicted sample diagnosis with 90% accuracy (Figure 1E). Five-fold cross validation indicated that the model was not overfit to the dataset. The high predictive capability of the optimal RF model suggests a strong microbial signature was associated with PNAC.
DISCUSSION
We detected significant differences in the stool microbiota of premature twins discordant for PNAC. Specifically, the relative abundance of genera differed, including increased levels of gram-negative bacteria Veillonella, Klebsiella, and Enterobacter in infants with PNAC. This finding is intriguing given well known associations of gram-negative infections in neonates and the development of cholestasis12,13and raises the question of whether increased intestinal colonization alone, rather than frank infection, with these microbes is sufficient to provoke cholestasis. Indeed, increased intestinal Enterobacteriaceae9 has been described in adults with cirrhosis, whereas increased Klebsiella and Veillonella has been described in adults with primary biliary cholangitis.10 A predominance of Enterobacteriaceae has also been identified in infants with short bowel syndrome and PN-associated liver disease.11 The actual species and strains associated with PNAC will need to be identified in future studies, using techniques such as shotgun metagenomic sequencing.
The extent to which these changes in the relative abundance of genera occur prior to cholestasis versus a result of cholestasis cannot be answered in this pilot study because cholestatic subjects from two twin sets (1 and 2) developed cholestasis before the first stool sample was collected. However, in one twin set (4), the subject who developed PNAC displayed an increase in Veillonella abundance relative to their non-PNAC twin at the same time point. This question is of the utmost importance to answer, due to the significant potential utility of being able to identify which infants might be susceptible to PNAC before clinical evidence of PNAC develops. Early interventions to mitigate the development of PNAC could then be initiated in at risk infants, e.g., early enteral feeding and the use of fish oil-based lipid emulsions.5 While this approach would be difficult to test in human neonates, gnotobiotic models of PNAC might offer one path forward for testing whether specific gram-negative bacteria are predictive, or even causal, in the development of PNAC.22
Certainly, the ability to predict the development of cholestasis based on a microbiota signature would be powerful. In our study, a predictive model of PNAC was created based on five genera, providing a method for identifying informative microbial signatures using RF. This model needs to be further trained and tested on larger datasets to ensure that it remains valid in a broader population of at-risk infants. In addition, testing it in at-risk infants who have not yet developed PNAC will be imperative. If increased levels of certain gram-negative bacteria are found to be causal or compounding in PNAC, targeted interventions such as antibiotics, probiotics, or fecal microbiota transplantation could be investigated.
Limitations of this study include the small number of infant twin pairs. However, this limited sample size is offset somewhat by the use of discordant twin pairs, potentially reducing confounding from the intrauterine environment, age, genetics and maternal breast milk and rigorous analysis of serial stool samples. An additional limitation is that tests used to exclude other causes of cholestasis in each cholestatic subject were not homogeneous and were dependent on the clinical situation.
In conclusion, we found marked differences in the diversity and relative abundance of stool microbiota in infants who developed PNAC versus twin controls, most notably an increase in gram-negative bacteria Veillonella, Klebsiella, and Enterobacter. This finding warrants further exploration in larger cohorts and experimental models to determine if signals in the microbiota are predictive of PNAC, thereby providing a basis for interventions to mitigate the development of PNAC in vulnerable infants.
Supplementary Material
What is known:
Parenteral nutrition associated cholestasis (PNAC) causes significant morbidity.
Infection with certain gut-associated bacteria has been associated with cholestasis.
There is a paucity of data investigating the role of intestinal microbiota in PNAC.
What is new.
Significant alterations in gut microbiota diversity and overrepresentation of certain gram-negative bacteria were associated with PNAC in twin analyses.
Findings may form the basis for further exploration to determine if a microbiota signature predicts PNAC.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Kristy and Roger Crombie for their generous philanthropic donation toward this project in loving memory of their daughter Anna Charlotte.
Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UL1TR003015 (Moore, Hourigan) and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development under Award Number K23HD099240 (Hourigan). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
References
- 1.Satrom K, Gourley G. Cholestasis in preterm infants. Clin Perinatology. 2016;43(2):355–373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mangalat N, Bell C, Graves A, et al. Natural history of conjugated bilirubin trajectory in neonates following parenteral nutrition cessation. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14(1):2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Christensen RD, Henry E, Wiedmeier SE, et al. Identifying patients, on the first day of life, at high-risk of developing parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease. J Perinatol. 2007;27(5):284–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kim A, Lim R, Han Y, et al. Parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis in very low birth weight infants: A single center experience. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.2016;19(1):61–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Park HW, Lee NM, Kim JH, et al. Parenteral fish oil-containing lipid emulsions may reverse parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis in neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nutr. 2015;145(2):277–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cahova M, Bratova M, Wohl P. Parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease: The role of the gut microbiota. Nutrients. 2017;9(9):987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Li Y, Tang R, Leung PSC, et al. Bile acids and intestinal microbiota in autoimmune cholestatic liver diseases. Autoimmun Rev. 2017;16(9):885–896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee WS, Sokol RJ. Intestinal microbiota, lipids, and the pathogenesis of intestinal Failure–Associated liver disease. J Pediatr. 2015;167(3):519–526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bajaj JS, Heuman DM, Hylemon PB, et al. Altered profile of human gut microbiome is associated with cirrhosis and its complications. J Hepatol. 2014;60(5):940–947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tang R, Wei Y, Li Y, et al. Gut microbial profile is altered in primary biliary cholangitis and partially restored after UDCA therapy. Gut. 2018;67(3):534–541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang P, Wang Y, Lu L, et al. Alterations in intestinal microbiota relate to intestinal failure-associated liver disease and central line infections. J Pediatr Surg. 2017;52(8):1318–1326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Khalil S, Shah D, Faridi MM, et al. Prevalence and outcome of hepatobiliary dysfunction in neonatal septicaemia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54(2):218–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sieniawska M, Wróblewska-Kaluzewska M, Nalecz A, et al. Hyperbilirubinemia in infants with urinary tract infection. Pol Med Sci Hist Bull. 1976;15(1):79–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Repa A, Lochmann R, Unterasinger L, at al. Aggressive nutrition in extremely low birth weight infants: Impact on parenteral nutrition associated cholestasis and growth. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fawaz R, Baumann U, Ekong U, et al. Guideline for the Evaluation of Cholestatic Jaundice in Infants: Joint Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;64(1):154–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rothschild D, Weissbrod O, Barkan E, et al. Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota. Nature. 2018;555(7695):210–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13(7):581–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Holmes SP. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. The ISME journal. 2017;11(12):2639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, et al. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(16):5261–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wickham H ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag;, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Harris JK, El Kasmi KC, Anderson AL, et al. Specific microbiome changes in a mouse model of parenteral nutrition associated liver injury and intestinal inflammation. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e110396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

