Skip to main content
Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids logoLink to Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids
. 2020 Oct 22;22:1164–1175. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.10.025

LINC00857 Interacting with YBX1 to Regulate Apoptosis and Autophagy via MET and Phosphor-AMPKa Signaling

Wenmei Su 1,5, Lihui Wang 2,5, Huijie Zhao 3, Shengmin Hu 3, Yi Zhou 3, Chunfang Guo 4, Bin Wu 1, Lixia Li 1, Zhixiong Yang 1,∗∗, David G Beer 4, Guoan Chen 3,
PMCID: PMC7701017  PMID: 33312753

Abstract

Long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) LINC00857 has been reported to be upregulated in lung cancer and related to poor patient survival. It can regulate cell proliferation and tumor growth in lung cancer as well as several other cancers. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms that are regulated by LINC00857 are unclear. In this study, we found that LINC00857 silencing can impair cell proliferation in 14 different genomic alterations of lung cancer cell lines. These alterations are EGFR, KRAS, TP53, MET, and LKB1 mutations. The cell apoptosis and autophagy were induced upon LINC00857 silencing in lung cancer cells. Mechanistically, LINC00857 can bind to the Y-box binding protein 1 (YBX1) protein, prevent it from proteasomal degradation, and increase its nuclear translocation. LINC00857 regulated MET expression via YBX1 at a transcriptional level. Induced cell autophagy by LINC00857 knockdown was mainly through increased phosphor-AMP-activated protein kinase (p-AMPK)a. Collectively, LINC00857-YBX1-MET/p-AMPKa signaling is critical to regulate cell proliferation, apoptosis, and autophagy, which may provide a potential clinically therapeutic target in lung cancer.

Keywords: LINC00857, YBX1, lung cancer, autophagy, apoptosis

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg


Su and colleagues demonstrated that LINC00857 silencing can decrease cell proliferation and induce apoptosis and autophagy in lung cancer cells. LINC00857 is a potential oncogene that acts through binding and stabilizing YBX1, thereby regulating cell survival/death via YBX1-MET and p-AMPKa signaling.

Introduction

Based on the Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN) statistics, lung cancer is the most frequent cancer (2.094 million in 2018) and the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide (1.761 million deaths in 2018).1, 2, 3 Pathologically, lung cancer is classified into two major subtypes: small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). NSCLCs comprise 85% of all lung cancer cases and are subclassified into adenocarcinoma (AD), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and large cell carcinoma.4,5 Although new approaches have emerged during past decades in the treatment of lung cancer patients, including reagents that target epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, alkaline phosphatase (ALK) fusion, and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy,6, 7, 8, 9 the 5-year survival rate of NSCLC remains less than 18%.2,3 The poor prognosis and high recurrence rate of lung cancer may be partially due to the histological and molecular heterogeneity of this disease.5,10 Therefore, it is crucial to establish the underlying molecular mechanisms underlying lung cancer and to develop new, effective diagnostic biomarkers and treatment strategies to improve patient survival.11

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a class of RNA molecules with a length of more than 200 nucleotides and play a vital role in many aspects of cancer biology.12, 13, 14, 15 Studies have shown that lncRNAs are often highly dysregulated in tumors,16, 17, 18, 19 affecting cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, and apoptosis, and thus integrally involved in the development of cancer.20 lncRNAs can regulate gene expression through several different mechanisms, including chromatin modification, transcription, and post-transcriptional processing.14,21 We recently generated transcriptome data using next-generation RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to reveal noncoding RNA expression patterns in lung cancer.22 Mining this high-density RNA-seq data, we identified several dysregulated lncRNAs in lung cancer, including LINC00857,22 MIR22HG,16 LINC00152,23 and FAM83H-AS1,24 which may have potential as new diagnostic or prognostic markers, as well as therapeutic targets for lung cancer.

LINC00857 was one of the top dysregulated lncRNAs in lung cancer,22 both highly expressed and its upregulation related to poor patient survival in lung cancer. LINC00857 was found to regulate cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and tumor growth in lung cancer22 and recently also shown to play an oncogenic role in gastric, bladder, liver, and esophageal cancers.25, 26, 27, 28, 29 The molecular mechanisms of its role in cancer biology, however, remain poorly understood. In this study, we demonstrate that LINC00857 regulates cell proliferation in lung cancer cells with various genomic alterations and also found that LINC00857 can affect cell death signaling, including both cell apoptosis and autophagy. Mechanistically, we discovered that LINC00857 can interact with the Y-box binding protein 1 (YBX1) protein and protect it from undergoing proteasomal degradation. We thus show that LINC00857 regulates apoptosis and autophagy through YBX1-MET and phosphor-AMP-activated protein kinase (p-AMPK)a signaling.

Results

LINC00857 Knockdown Impairs Cell Proliferation in Lung Cancer Cells with Different Genomic Alterations

In our recent publication, knocking down LINC00857 reduced tumor cell proliferation, colony formation, migration, invasion in vitro, and tumor growth in vivo.22 In that study, we only used H1299 and H838 cell lines, thus to investigate whether LINC00857 has a broad effect on cancer cell growth; here, we tested 14 lung cancer cell lines representing different histological subtypes (including 13 ADs and 1 SCC) and different genomic alterations, including the EGFR, KRAS, TP53, MET, and LKB11 mutation status (Table S1) using the WST-1 cell proliferation assay following LINC00857 knockdown. The efficiency of small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated knocking down of LINC00857 was 80%–95% (Figure 1A). We found that the cell survival rate was from 32% to 85% on these 14 tested NSCLC cell lines upon LINC00857 knockdown with siRNAs, indicating that LINC00857 could affect cell proliferation regardless of the KRAS, EGFR, MET, LKB11, and TP53 mutation status and histological subtypes (Figure 1B). Cell proliferation was not affected by LINC00857 knockdown in the normal lung fibroblast cell IMR-90 (Figure 1C), suggesting that the role of LINC00857 may be less relevant in normal cells.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

LINC00857 Knockdown Impairs Cell Proliferation

(A) LINC00857 siRNA knockdown efficiency on 3 lung cancer cell lines mainly used in this study. (B and C) Effect of cell proliferation (cell survival rate) in lung tumor cells and lung fibroblast cell IMR-90 after LINC00857 knockdown by siRNA (10 nM) measured by WST-1 (at 120 h). Cell survival rate is normalized to nontargeting control siRNA (siCtrl). Values represent the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.

LINC00857 Knockdown Induces Apoptosis and Autophagy

Since we found that LINC00857 could affect cell proliferation through cell cycle regulation,22 we investigated whether LINC00857 might affect cell death signaling. We measured the apoptosis marker cleavage PARP (c-PARP) protein and the autophagic marker LC3B, as well as the autophagic flux assay using the Premo Autophagy Tandem Sensor red fluorescent protein (RFP)-GFP-LC3B. We found that the apoptosis marker c-PARP was significantly increased at 72 h on H1975 and PC-9 cells after LINC00857 knockdown (Figures 2A and 2B). We also found that c-PARP was induced on H1299 and H2228 cells (Figure S1). The autophagy marker LC3B I to II conversion (II/I ratio) was increased at 72 h (Figure 2B), and the puncta of autolysosome was also increased (Figures 2C and 2D) after LINC00857 knockdown. These results indicated that LINC00857 is not only involved in cell proliferation but also in both apoptosis and autophagy, although how LINC00857 regulates cell death is unknown.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

LINC00857 Knockdown Induces Apoptosis and Autophagy

(A) Cleaved PARP was increased after LINC00857 knockdown by siRNA measured by western blot (at 72 h). (B) Autophagy marker (LC3B I to II conversion) was induced at 72 h for both PC-9 and H1975 after LINC00857 knockdown by siRNA. Nontargeting siRNA (NT) as control (indicated by −). (C) H1975 cells were treated with siRNAs for 48 h and infected with Premo Autophagy Tandem Sensor RFP-GFP-LC3B for 24 h. Live cells were visualized with a fluorescence microscope. (D) Autophagosomes and autolysosomes in each 200× field (from image C) were counted; at least 100 cells were counted for each siRNA treatment cell line.

LINC00857 Interacts with the YBX1 Protein and Protects It from Proteasomal Degradation

To explore the molecular mechanisms underlying the oncogenic activity of LINC00857, we sought to use RNA pull-down assays and mass spectrometry (MS) to identify proteins interacting with LINC00857. Silver staining of SDS-PAGE shows LINC00857-interacting proteins from the LINC00857 RNA pull-down assay. The different protein bands between the antisense group and sense group were submitted for MS analysis (Figure 3A). Among the MS-identified proteins, YBX1 and CA6 (carbonic anhydrase 6) had the highest frequency and identity score, which indicated that LINC00857 might bind to these proteins. To further confirm the interaction between LINC00857 and YBX1, we performed a RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assay, in which the RNA-YBX1 complex was immunoprecipitated using a YBX1 antibody. The amount of LINC00857 RNA in the coprecipitate was then measured by quantitative real-time PCR. Compared with the immunoglobulin G (IgG)-bound sample, the YBX1 antibody-bound complex had a significant increase in the amount of LINC00857 RNA (Figure 3B), indicating that LINC00857 may directly bind to the YBX1 protein. Further, we found that the YBX1 protein level was decreased after LINC00857 knockdown with siRNA (Figure 3C), but the YBX1 mRNA level was not changed (Figure 3D), suggesting that LINC00857 regulated YBX1 at the protein level. We found that the YBX1 protein was decreased more in LINC00857 siRNA treatment cells as compared to control after treatment with protein synthesis inhibits reagent cycloheximide (CHX) (Figure S2). As MG132 is a proteasome inhibitor, we asked if LINC00857 affected YBX1 protein degradation via the proteasome. As expected, we found that in the presence of MG132, YBX1 protein expression in the LINC00857 knockdown cells was markedly increased and reached a level that was comparable to that in the control-treated cells (Figure 3E). These results indicated that LINC00857 interacted with the YBX1 protein and prevented it from proteasomal-mediated degradation. YBX1 appears to be an important factor in lung cancer, and we previously reported that lung cancer cell proliferation was decreased after siRNA knockdown of YBX1, indicating that YBX1 may play an oncogenic role in lung cancer.16

Figure 3.

Figure 3

LINC00857 Interacts with the YBX1 Protein

(A) Silver staining of SDS-PAGE showing LINC00857-interacting proteins from LINC00857 RNA pull-down assay. The different protein bands between the antisense group and sense group were indicated with arrows. They were submitted for mass spectrometry (MS) analysis. An extra band between 35 and 40 kD in LINC00857 binding proteins was identified as YBX1 by MS. (B) Real-time PCR confirmed that LINC00857 was accumulated in the YBX1-precipitated protein sample using the RIP assay in H1299 cell. (C) The YBX1 protein level was decreased after LINC00857 knockdown with siRNA. (D) Real time PCR showing YBX1 mRNAs was not changed after LINC00857 knockdown by siRNA as compared to control at 48 h. (E) LINC00857 prevented YBX1 protein from proteasome degradation in PC-9 cells.

LINC00857 Knockdown Blocks YBX1 Translocation from the Cytoplasm to the Nucleus

In order to determine the cellular localization of LINC00857, we performed quantitative real-time PCR from RNA isolated from total, nuclear, and cytoplasmic fractions and found that LINC00857 was primarily located in the cytoplasmic (60%–70%) and nuclear fractions (30%–40%) (Figures 4A and 4B). Immunofluorescence staining of LINC00857 further confirmed that LINC00857 is mainly located in the cytoplasm (Figure 4C). The YBX protein family has three members: YBX1, YBX2, and YBX3. The CSD (cold shock domain) of these three family members is more than 90% identical, yet there is no significant homology in the other parts of the molecules.30 YBX1 was reported to be expressed in both the cytoplasm and nucleus.30 We found that YBX1 protein is present in both cytoplasm and nuclear fractions by western blot, and YBX1 protein expression was decreased mainly in cytoplasm upon LINC00857 knockdown (Figure 4D). The expression status and function of YBX2 and YBX3 were not clear. YBX1 was found to accumulate in the centrosome during the mitotic phase.31 YBX1 transitions from the cytoplasm to the nucleus in the following cases: at G1/S-phase interface, treatment with UV radiation, DNA-damaging agents, upon oxidative stress hyperthermia, and interaction with SRp30c and p53.30 We performed YBX1 immunofluorescence staining on PC-9 cells after LINC00857 knockdown and found that YBX1 protein was present in both the cytoplasm and nucleus but accumulated in the nucleus at mitosis in control cells (rounded-up cells) (Figure 4E) and was consistent with previous reports.31,32 Importantly, we found that the nuclear total (T)-YBX1 protein was significantly decreased upon LINC00857 knockdown, suggesting that LINC00857 may not only affect T-YBX1 degradation but also affect YBX1 nuclear translocation.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

LINC00857 Cell Location and Knockdown Block YBX1 Nuclear Translocation

(A and B) Quantitative real-time PCR showing the nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions of LINC00857 in H1975 and PC-9 cells. LINC00857 is mainly in the cytoplasm (>60%–70%). GAPDH is used as a cytoplasmic control and PVT1) lncRNA as a nuclear control. Red, cytoplasmic; blue, nuclear. (C) RNA immunofluorescence staining (RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH]) showing LINC00857 (red) located mainly in the cytoplasm in PC-9 cells. Bars, 40 μm. (D) Western blot indicates that YBX1 and MET proteins are present in both cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions. (E) YBX1 immunofluorescence staining in PC-9 cells. Red indicates YBX1 protein expression. Right image is magnified from left merged images.

LINC00857 or YBX1 Knockdown Decreases Oncogenic MET Expression

To uncover the potential proteins or pathways affected by LINC00857, we performed p-kinase protein antibody array and receptor tyrosine kinase phosphorylation antibody array analyses, which include more than 100 proteins covering most of the cancer-related pathways. Among these proteins, we found that the p-MET was the most significantly decreased protein after LINC00857 knockdown in PC-9 lung cancer cells (Figure 5A). We then performed western blot analyses that confirmed that both p-MET and T-MET were decreased upon LINC00857 knockdown in five lung cancer cell lines (Figure 5B), and the decrease in MET occurred as early as 24 h after LINC00857 siRNA treatment (Figure 5C). With the use of quantitative real-time PCR, we found that MET mRNA was also decreased upon LINC00857 knockdown (Figure 5D). This suggests that LINC00857 regulation of MET expression may be at the transcription level.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

LINC00857 Knockdown Decreases Oncogenic MET Expression

(A) Receptor tyrosine kinase phosphorylation antibody array indicated that MET is the most significantly decreased protein after LINC00857 knockdown by siRNA (10 nM at 72 h) as compared to control siCtrl in the PC-9 cell. (B) MET protein was decreased after LINC00857 knockdown with siRNA in 5 cell lines by western blot. (C) MET protein was decreased after LINC00857 knockdown with siRNA at 24- to 96-h time points by western blot. (D) MET mRNA was decreased after LINC00857 siRNA treatment.

As a master regulator of cancer cell biology, YBX1 is involved in all of Hanahan’s “hallmarks of cancer.”33,34 The YBX1 protein performs its functions both in the cytoplasm (as an RNA binding protein) and in the cell nucleus (as a transcription factor).30,35 Nuclear YBX1 has been reported to promote MET expression by directly binding to the MET promoter in basal-like breast cancers.36 Consistent with this, we have previously confirmed that both MET protein and mRNA were decreased after YBX1 knockdown in lung cancer cells.16 From these results, we anticipated that LINC00857 interacts with YBX1 and transports YBX1 to the nucleus, where as a transcription factor, YBX1 regulates MET expression.

MET Knockdown Decreases Cell Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis and Autophagy

We have previously found that cell proliferation was decreased in lung cancer cells after MET knockdown with siRNA.16 Here, we found that apoptosis and autophagy were also induced by MET knockdown (Figure 6A), suggesting that MET may play an important role in LINC00857 regulation of cell growth, apoptosis, and autophagy. Further, we found that the MET protein could be increased by LINC00857 overexpression (Figure 6B), which further confirms that MET is regulated by LINC00857. With the use of the GEPIA (Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis) dataset (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/), we found that MET mRNA was significantly, positively correlated with LINC00857 in lung AD (LUAD) (Figure 6C). Taken together, it appears that LINC00857 interacts with the YBX1 protein and protects it from proteasomal degradation in the cytoplasm. Then LINC00857 brings YBX1 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus where YBX1 binds to the promoter of MET and regulates MET expression. Thus, that LINC00857 plays an oncogenic role may be via this YBX1-MET axis (Figure 6D).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

MET Knockdown Induces Apoptosis and Autophagy

(A) Apoptosis (measured by cleaved PARP) and autophagy (measured by LC3B) were induced after MET knockdown. (B) MET protein was induced by overexpression of LINC00857-pcDNA-DEST53 transfection. The pcDNA-DEST53 vector was used as a control. (C) MET was significantly, positively correlated with LINC00857 in LUAD. (D) Schematic of LINC00857 in stabilizing YBX1 and promoting MET expression. In cells with higher LINC00857 levels, LINC00857 binds and prevents YBX1 from proteasome degradation and promotes MET expression by binding to the MET promoter. Upon LINC00857 knockdown, YBX1 is degraded and blocks YBX1 nucleus translocation.

LINC00857 Knockdown Increases the Expression of the p-AMPKa Protein

In order to explore the mechanisms involved in LINC00857 regulation of autophagy, we screened the expression of multiple autophagy-related proteins by western blot. We found p-AMPKa protein, not the total protein or mRNA, was significantly increased after LINC00857 knockdown with siRNA in lung cancer cells, and this increased expression occurred as early as 24 h (Figures 7A and 7B). Other autophagy-related proteins, such as LKB1, mTOR, ATG7, EGFR, and AKT, were not significantly changed after LINC00857 knockdown at 72 h (Figure 7C). The levels of p-AMPKa were not changed after YBX1 knockdown (data not shown). These results suggest that LINC00857 regulation of p-AMPKa is independent of YBX1, LKB1, mTOR, and ATG7 molecules.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

LINC00857 Knockdown Increases the Expression of the Phosphor (p)-AMPKa Protein

(A and B) p-AMPKa protein, not the total protein and mRNA, was significantly increased after LINC00857 knockdown with siRNA in lung cancer cells and occurred as early as 24 h in H1975 and H1299 cells. (C) Other autophagy-related proteins, such as LKB1, mTOR, ATG7, as well as EGFR and AKT, were not changed significantly after LINC00857 knockdown at 72 h. (D) AMPKa (RPKAA1 gene) mRNA knockdown efficiency using RPKAA1 siRNA at 48 h. (E) Autophagy was blocked (indicated by LC3B) after AMPKa knockdown. Changes of p62, mTOR, and ATG7 were not consistent among these cells.

AMPK has critical roles in regulating both growth and reprogramming metabolism and has recently been connected to cellular processes, such as autophagy and cell polarity.37 AMPK controls autophagy at different points.38 In order to confirm whether AMPKa is required for autophagy regulation in lung cancer, we knocked down AMPKa (RPKAA1 gene) with siRNAs (Figures 7D and 7E), followed by western blot, using the autophagy marker LC3B. As shown in Figure 7E, the ratio of LC3B II/I (conversion from LC3B I to LC3B II) was significantly decreased, indicating that autophagy was blocked in all 5 lung cancer cell lines tested after AMPKa knockdown. Again, AMPKa downstream proteins, mTOR and ATG7, were not changed, indicating that these two proteins may be not required for AMPKa in regulating autophagy in these lung cancer cells.

Crosstalk of LINC00857, AMPKa, and MET

From our preliminary studies, we have found that LINC00857 regulates apoptosis and autophagy potentially via the YBX-MET axis and autophagy via p-AMPKa. In order to understand if there is crosstalk or feedback among these three major molecules, we performed knockdown of MET or AMPKa, followed by real-time PCR or western blot. We found that p-AMPKa protein was slightly increased in H1299 cells and in H1975 cells after MET knockdown (Figure 8A), yet no changes of AMPKa mRNA and LINC00857 were observed (data not shown). Surprisingly, we found that both MET protein and mRNA were significantly decreased upon AMPKa knockdown (Figures 8B and 8C), indicating that a role of AMPKa in regulating MET expression is at the transcriptional level, although currently, the mechanism is unknown. LINC00857 expression was increased after AMPKa knockdown (Figure 8D), indicating that there may be a feedback between AMPKa and LINC00857. Taken together, LINC00857 regulation of apoptosis and autophagy may be through two separate signaling mechanisms (Figure 8E).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Crosstalk of LINC00857, AMPKa, and MET

(A) p-AMPKa was slightly increased after MET knockdown with siRNAs at 72 h. (B and C) Both protein and mRNA of MET were significantly decreased after AMPKa (RPKAA1 gene) knockdown with siRNA at 72 h. (D) LINC00857 was increased after AMPKa (RPKAA1 gene) knockdown with siRNA at 48 h. (E) Schematic of role of LINC00857 in regulation of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and autophagy through YBX1-MET and AMPKa signaling.

Discussion

Lung cancer is a complex disease associated with a variety of genetic mutations, epigenetic alterations, chromosomal translocations, deletions, and amplifications.39,40 The poor outcomes of lung cancer patients may be partially due to the complicated molecular mechanisms underlying the cancer progression, as well as lack of early diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets.41, 42, 43 The aberrant expression of lncRNAs is a molecular phenotype of cancers19,44 and involved in each of the hallmarks of cancer phenotypes, including proliferation, growth suppression, motility, immortality, angiogenesis, and viability.45 The molecular mechanisms underlying these cancer phenotypes regulated by lncRNAs influence interactions with cellular macromolecules, including chromatin, proteins, mRNAs, or microRNAs (miRNAs).45 We have previously reported that LINC00857 was upregulated in lung cancer tissues, and its increased expression was correlated with poor survival in patients with lung cancer.22 Further, we found LINC00857 regulates cell proliferation and tumor growth via cell cycle regulation.22 In this study, we uncovered new mechanisms of the LINC00857 role in lung cancer. We found that LINC00857 can affect apoptosis and autophagy. LINC00857 can interact with YBX1 protein and protect it from proteasomal degradation. YBX1-MET and p-AMPKa were the major signaling for LINC00857 in regulating apoptosis and autophagy.

Numerous studies have established that lncRNAs can modulate cell proliferation, migration, invasion, drug resistance, apoptosis, and autophagy in cancer cells.46, 47, 48 LINC00857 has been reported to play oncologic roles in several cancers.22,25, 26, 27, 28 For example, LINC00857 regulates cell proliferation in lung, bladder, gastric, esophageal, and liver cancer.22,25, 26, 27, 28, 29 Knockdown of LINC00857 sensitizes bladder cancer cells to cisplatin.25 LINC00857 silencing represses hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype.27 Recent reports indicate that LINC00857 knockdown can induce apoptosis in HCC, esophageal AD, and LUAD;27, 28, 29 however, the underlying mechanisms remains unclear. In this study, we discovered that LINC00857 knockdown could induce apoptosis, which may be via the YBX1-MET and AMPKa signaling pathways.

YBX1 functions as an RNA-binding protein and has been implicated in numerous cellular processes, including the regulation of transcription and translation.30,49 YBX1 regulates gene transcription and translation; on the other hand, YBX-1 is controlled by oncogenes or tumor-suppressor genes. Cell fate factor DACH1 can represses YBX1-mediated oncogenic transcription and translation.50 Several reports demonstrate that some lncRNAs plays oncogenic roles through interaction with YBX1.16,51, 52, 53, 54, 55 In this study, we found that LINC00857 can bind and stabilize the YBX1 protein. LINC00857 knockdown decreases YBX1 protein levels (not mRNA level) and can affect YBX1 protein nuclear translocation. Experiments of YBX1-associated ubiquitination in control and LINC00857 knockdown cells treated with MG132 may be needed in the future. Notably, loss of LINC00857 or YBX1 decreases MET expression at both the mRNA and protein levels. Previously, we16 and others36 have reported that YBX1 could regulate MET expression via binding to the MET promoter region. These results suggest that LINC00857 may participate in tumorigenesis functions, including apoptosis and autophagy, through the LINC00857-YBX1-MET axis.

Autophagy is a highly evolutionarily conserved, lysosomal-dependent degradation pathway that is widely present in eukaryotic cells.56 Abnormal autophagy function is associated with many diseases, such as cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, muscle diseases, diabetes, pathogenic microbial infections, etc.57 Autophagy plays a dual role in the development of lung cancer. On one hand, autophagy can eliminate harmful substances in the body and inhibit the formation of lung tumors, yet it can also alter environmental homeostasis and affect the survival and metastasis of tumor cells.58 Tumor cells can also acquire energy through autophagy to maintain their rapid proliferation. Several studies have demonstrated that lncRNAs could regulate autophagy underlying different mechanisms.15,47,59 In this study, we found that autophagic marker LC3B II and an autolysosome were induced after LINC00857, MET, or p-AMPKa knockdown, which supports that LINC00857 affects autophagy via YBX1-MET and p-AMPKa signaling.

AMPK can be activated by various types of metabolic stress that lead to ATP depletion, such as conditions of low nutrient supply, prolonged exercise, or via an increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration. The upstream kinases, LKB1 and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase β (CAMKKβ), activate AMPK by phosphorylating Thr172 in the activation loop of the catalytic α-subunit.60 AMPK has critical roles in regulating growth and reprogramming metabolism and has recently been connected to cellular processes, such as autophagy and cell polarity.37 AMPK controls autophagy at different steps.38 Several lncRNAs were reported to be involved in AMPK regulation.61,62 Depletion of lncRNA NBR2 attenuates energy stress-induced AMPK activation, resulting in unchecked cell cycling, an altered apoptosis/autophagy response, and increased tumor development in vivo.63 In order to confirm if AMPKa is required for autophagy regulation in lung cancer, we knocked down AMPKa (RPKAA1 gene) with siRNAs, followed by western blot, using the autophagy marker LC3B. As shown in Figure 7E, the ratio of LC3B II/I (conversion from LC3B I to LC3B II) was significantly decreased, indicating that autophagy was blocked in all five lung cancer cell lines tested after AMPKa knockdown. Again, AMPKa downstream proteins, mTOR and ATG7, were not changed, indicating these two proteins may be not required for AMPKa regulation of autophagy in these lung cancer cells. We conclude that p-AMPKa is required for LINC00857 to regulate autophagy in lung cancer cells. Because the mechanism of how LINC00857 regulates p-AMPK is still not clear, further characterization is needed.

In summary, LINC00857 can interact with YBX1 protein and prevent it from proteasome degradation. LINC00857 can help YBX1 nuclear translocation and regulate MET expression. lncRNA LINC00857 silencing can impair cell proliferation and induce apoptosis and autophagy in lung cancer, which may be through YBX1-MET and p-AMPKa signaling. Our data reveal that LINC00857 plays a critical role in cell survival and death signaling and may provide a strategy for using LINC00857 as a potential biomarker and a therapeutic target for lung cancer.

Materials and Methods

Cell Culture

Human cell lines PC-9, H1299, H1975, H838, and H2228 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. All cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA). All media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and maintained in a 37°C incubator with a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

Cell Proliferation Assays

Cells were plated at a density of 1,000 cells per well in a 96-well plate. LINC00857 siRNA and control siRNA were added at 24 and 48 h. Cell proliferation was measured using a WST-1 reagent (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) from 96 to 120 h after siRNA transfection, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All experiments were repeated three times. siRNA sequences used in this study were summarized in Table S2.

RNA Isolation and Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Total RNA from human tissues and cultured cells was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Then 2 μg of RNA was reverse transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) using Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MLV) Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed on the Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara, Dalian, China). The expression of lncRNA and mRNAs was normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The gene-specific primer sequences used were summarized in Table S3.

Western Blotting

Cells were harvested 72 h after siRNA transfection. Lysis, electrophoresis, and target protein visualization were performed, as described previously.22 Total cell lysates were prepared with sample buffer and boiled at 95°C for 5 min. The samples were transferred to SDS-PAGE at 80 V for 3 h and then transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes for another 3 h. After incubation with specific antibodies for T-MET, p-MET, T-YBX1, PARP, LC3B, T-AMPKa, p-AMPKa, T-LKB1, p-LKB1, T-mTOR, p-mTOR, ATG7, T-EGFR, T-AKT, p-AKT, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and GAPDH at 4°C overnight, the membranes then were washed by 1% Tris-buffered saline-Tween 20 (TBST) three times, incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h, developed using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL), and exposed to X-ray film. More detailed information of antibodies used in this study was summarized in Table S4.

Cytoplasmic and Nuclear RNA Isolation

Cytoplasmic and nuclear RNA were isolated and purified using the Cytoplasmic and Nuclear RNA Purification Kit (Norgen, Belmont, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol.

RNA Pull-Down Assays

RNA pull-down assays were used to identify proteins interacting with LINC00857. Briefly, biotinylated full-length LINC00857 or antisense transcript (negative control), synthesized by the TranscriptAid T7 High Yield Transcription Kit (Cat. K0441; Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), was incubated with the protein lysate from H1299 cells, and the coprecipitated proteins were isolated with streptavidin-agarose beads by the RiboTrap Kit (Cat. RN1012; MBL International, Japan). The RNA-associating proteins were resolved on SDS-PAGE gel, and the specific bands of potential LINC00857-bound proteins were compared with an antisense transcript and determined by MS.

RIP Assays

RIP experiments were performed using a Magna RIP RNA-Binding Protein Immunoprecipitation Kit (Cat. 17-701; Millipore, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The antibodies for RIP assays of YBX1 (Cat. ab12148, ab76149) were from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA).

Autophagic Flux Measurement

Autophagic flux was measured by Premo Autophagy Tandem Sensor RFP-GFP-LC3 reagent (Life Technologies; P36239). Cells in 96-well plates were treated with LINC00857 siRNA for 24 h, and RFP-GFP-LC3 reagent was added to each well at a concentration of 20 particles, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Fluorescence images were captured after 24 h incubation using microscope, and the autophagosomes (yellow punctas in fusion images) and autolysosomes (red punctas in fusion images) were counted in at least 100 cells in a 200× field.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using Prism version 7 (GraphPad Software, CA, USA) and R software. All values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Cell proliferation data were analyzed using Student’s t tests. All tests were 2 sided, and statistical significance was noted at p < 0.05. Three triplicate independent experiments were performed for cell biological assays, unless otherwise stated.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported, in part, by the Southern University of Science and Technology Starting Foundation (to G.C.); Shenzhen High Level University Building Foundation (to G.C.); National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), China (32070625 to G.C., 82073388 to W.S., 81803564 to L.W., and 81871883 to Z.Y.); Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University Doctoral Foundation (grant number 2018052638 to W.S.); and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, China (grant number 2018M633619XB to L.W.). This study was supported by Center for Computational Science and Engineering of Southern University of Science and Technology.

Author Contributions

Z.Y., D.G.B., and G.C. designed the study. W.S. and L.W. conducted the study. H.Z., Y.Z., B.W., L.L., and C.G. collected data. W.S., Z.Y., and G.C. performed the statistical analyses and interpreted the data. W.S., D.G.B., and G.C. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the final version of the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.

Declaration of Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Supplemental Information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2020.10.025.

Contributor Information

Zhixiong Yang, Email: yangzhixiong068@126.com.

Guoan Chen, Email: cheng@sustech.edu.cn.

Supplemental Information

Document S1. Tables S1–S4 and Figures S1 and S2
mmc1.pdf (129.9KB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus Supplemental Information
mmc2.pdf (3.1MB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Mattiuzzi C., Lippi G. Current Cancer Epidemiology. J. Epidemiol. Glob. Health. 2019;9:217–222. doi: 10.2991/jegh.k.191008.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020;70:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Travis W.D. Lung Cancer Pathology: Current Concepts. Clin. Chest Med. 2020;41:67–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2019.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Inamura K. Lung Cancer: Understanding Its Molecular Pathology and the 2015 WHO Classification. Front. Oncol. 2017;7:193. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ready N.E., Ott P.A., Hellmann M.D., Zugazagoitia J., Hann C.L., de Braud F., Antonia S.J., Ascierto P.A., Moreno V., Atmaca A. Nivolumab Monotherapy and Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results From the CheckMate 032 Randomized Cohort. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2020;15:426–435. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hellmann M.D., Paz-Ares L., Bernabe Caro R., Zurawski B., Kim S.W., Carcereny Costa E., Park K., Alexandru A., Lupinacci L., de la Mora Jimenez E. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019;381:2020–2031. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Reck M., Rabe K.F. Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:849–861. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1703413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ramalingam S.S., Vansteenkiste J., Planchard D., Cho B.C., Gray J.E., Ohe Y., Zhou C., Reungwetwattana T., Cheng Y., Chewaskulyong B., FLAURA Investigators Overall Survival with Osimertinib in Untreated, EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:41–50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1913662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2017;67:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Aguilar E.J., Ricciuti B., Gainor J.F., Kehl K.L., Kravets S., Dahlberg S., Nishino M., Sholl L.M., Adeni A., Subegdjo S. Outcomes to first-line pembrolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and very high PD-L1 expression. Ann. Oncol. 2019;30:1653–1659. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cesana M., Cacchiarelli D., Legnini I., Santini T., Sthandier O., Chinappi M., Tramontano A., Bozzoni I. A long noncoding RNA controls muscle differentiation by functioning as a competing endogenous RNA. Cell. 2011;147:358–369. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nagano T., Fraser P. No-nonsense functions for long noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2011;145:178–181. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gil N., Ulitsky I. Regulation of gene expression by cis-acting long non-coding RNAs. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2020;21:102–117. doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0184-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang J., Wang P., Wan L., Xu S., Pang D. The emergence of noncoding RNAs as Heracles in autophagy. Autophagy. 2017;13:1004–1024. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1312041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Su W., Feng S., Chen X., Yang X., Mao R., Guo C., Wang Z., Thomas D.G., Lin J., Reddy R.M. Silencing of Long Noncoding RNA MIR22HG Triggers Cell Survival/Death Signaling via Oncogenes YBX1, MET, and p21 in Lung Cancer. Cancer Res. 2018;78:3207–3219. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mercer T.R., Dinger M.E., Mattick J.S. Long non-coding RNAs: insights into functions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009;10:155–159. doi: 10.1038/nrg2521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wilusz J.E., Sunwoo H., Spector D.L. Long noncoding RNAs: functional surprises from the RNA world. Genes Dev. 2009;23:1494–1504. doi: 10.1101/gad.1800909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ghafouri-Fard S., Shoorei H., Branicki W., Taheri M. Non-coding RNA profile in lung cancer. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2020;114:104411. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2020.104411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gupta R.A., Shah N., Wang K.C., Kim J., Horlings H.M., Wong D.J., Tsai M.C., Hung T., Argani P., Rinn J.L. Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR reprograms chromatin state to promote cancer metastasis. Nature. 2010;464:1071–1076. doi: 10.1038/nature08975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Anastasiadou E., Jacob L.S., Slack F.J. Non-coding RNA networks in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2018;18:5–18. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang L., He Y., Liu W., Bai S., Xiao L., Zhang J., Dhanasekaran S.M., Wang Z., Kalyana-Sundaram S., Balbin O.A. Non-coding RNA LINC00857 is predictive of poor patient survival and promotes tumor progression via cell cycle regulation in lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:11487–11499. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Feng S., Zhang J., Su W., Bai S., Xiao L., Chen X., Lin J., Reddy R.M., Chang A.C., Beer D.G., Chen G. Overexpression of LINC00152 correlates with poor patient survival and knockdown impairs cell proliferation in lung cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:2982. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03043-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang J., Feng S., Su W., Bai S., Xiao L., Wang L., Thomas D.G., Lin J., Reddy R.M., Carrott P.W. Overexpression of FAM83H-AS1 indicates poor patient survival and knockdown impairs cell proliferation and invasion via MET/EGFR signaling in lung cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:42819. doi: 10.1038/srep42819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dudek A.M., van Kampen J.G.M., Witjes J.A., Kiemeney L.A.L.M., Verhaegh G.W. LINC00857 expression predicts and mediates the response to platinum-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cancer Med. 2018;7:3342–3350. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pang K., Ran M.J., Zou F.W., Yang T.W., He F. Long non-coding RNA LINC00857 promotes gastric cancer cell proliferation and predicts poor patient survival. Oncol. Lett. 2018;16:2119–2124. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xia C., Zhang X.-Y., Liu W., Ju M., Ju Y., Bu Y.-Z., Wang W., Shao H. LINC00857 contributes to hepatocellular carcinoma malignancy via enhancing epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019;120:7970–7977. doi: 10.1002/jcb.28074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Su W., Wang L., Niu F., Zou L., Guo C., Wang Z., Yang X., Wu J., Lu Y., Zhang J. LINC00857 knockdown inhibits cell proliferation and induces apoptosis via involving STAT3 and MET oncogenic proteins in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Aging (Albany NY) 2019;11:2812–2821. doi: 10.18632/aging.101953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang L., Cao L., Wen C., Li J., Yu G., Liu C. LncRNA LINC00857 regulates lung adenocarcinoma progression, apoptosis and glycolysis by targeting miR-1179/SPAG5 axis. Hum. Cell. 2020;33:195–204. doi: 10.1007/s13577-019-00296-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Eliseeva I.A., Kim E.R., Guryanov S.G., Ovchinnikov L.P., Lyabin D.N. Y-box-binding protein 1 (YB-1) and its functions. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 2011;76:1402–1433. doi: 10.1134/S0006297911130049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kawaguchi A., Asaka M.N., Matsumoto K., Nagata K. Centrosome maturation requires YB-1 to regulate dynamic instability of microtubules for nucleus reassembly. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:8768. doi: 10.1038/srep08768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cohen A.A., Kalisky T., Mayo A., Geva-Zatorsky N., Danon T., Issaeva I., Kopito R.B., Perzov N., Milo R., Sigal A., Alon U. Protein dynamics in individual human cells: experiment and theory. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e4901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lasham A., Print C.G., Woolley A.G., Dunn S.E., Braithwaite A.W. YB-1: oncoprotein, prognostic marker and therapeutic target? Biochem. J. 2013;449:11–23. doi: 10.1042/BJ20121323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Goodarzi H., Liu X., Nguyen H.C., Zhang S., Fish L., Tavazoie S.F. Endogenous tRNA-Derived Fragments Suppress Breast Cancer Progression via YBX1 Displacement. Cell. 2015;161:790–802. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Finkbeiner M.R., Astanehe A., To K., Fotovati A., Davies A.H., Zhao Y., Jiang H., Stratford A.L., Shadeo A., Boccaccio C. Profiling YB-1 target genes uncovers a new mechanism for MET receptor regulation in normal and malignant human mammary cells. Oncogene. 2009;28:1421–1431. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mihaylova M.M., Shaw R.J. The AMPK signalling pathway coordinates cell growth, autophagy and metabolism. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011;13:1016–1023. doi: 10.1038/ncb2329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Herzig S., Shaw R.J. AMPK: guardian of metabolism and mitochondrial homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018;19:121–135. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang J., Fujimoto J., Zhang J., Wedge D.C., Song X., Zhang J., Seth S., Chow C.W., Cao Y., Gumbs C. Intratumor heterogeneity in localized lung adenocarcinomas delineated by multiregion sequencing. Science. 2014;346:256–259. doi: 10.1126/science.1256930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dhanasekaran S.M., Balbin O.A., Chen G., Nadal E., Kalyana-Sundaram S., Pan J., Veeneman B., Cao X., Malik R., Vats P. Transcriptome meta-analysis of lung cancer reveals recurrent aberrations in NRG1 and Hippo pathway genes. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:5893. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jamal-Hanjani M., Wilson G.A., McGranahan N., Birkbak N.J., Watkins T.B.K., Veeriah S., Shafi S., Johnson D.H., Mitter R., Rosenthal R., TRACERx Consortium Tracking the Evolution of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;376:2109–2121. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1616288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mascaux C., Tsao M.S., Hirsch F.R. Genomic Testing in Lung Cancer: Past, Present, and Future. J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. 2018;16:323–334. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.7019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mamdani H., Ahmed S., Armstrong S., Mok T., Jalal S.I. Blood-based tumor biomarkers in lung cancer for detection and treatment. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2017;6:648–660. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2017.09.03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Iyer M.K., Niknafs Y.S., Malik R., Singhal U., Sahu A., Hosono Y., Barrette T.R., Prensner J.R., Evans J.R., Zhao S. The landscape of long noncoding RNAs in the human transcriptome. Nat. Genet. 2015;47:199–208. doi: 10.1038/ng.3192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Schmitt A.M., Chang H.Y. Long Noncoding RNAs in Cancer Pathways. Cancer Cell. 2016;29:452–463. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li J., Tian H., Yang J., Gong Z. Long Noncoding RNAs Regulate Cell Growth, Proliferation, and Apoptosis. DNA Cell Biol. 2016;35:459–470. doi: 10.1089/dna.2015.3187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sun T. Long noncoding RNAs act as regulators of autophagy in cancer. Pharmacol. Res. 2018;129:151–155. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Frankel L.B., Lubas M., Lund A.H. Emerging connections between RNA and autophagy. Autophagy. 2017;13:3–23. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1222992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kosnopfel C., Sinnberg T., Schittek B. Y-box binding protein 1--a prognostic marker and target in tumour therapy. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2014;93:61–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2013.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wu K., Chen K., Wang C., Jiao X., Wang L., Zhou J., Wang J., Li Z., Addya S., Sorensen P.H. Cell fate factor DACH1 represses YB-1-mediated oncogenic transcription and translation. Cancer Res. 2014;74:829–839. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Liu Y., Zhao J., Zhang W., Gan J., Hu C., Huang G., Zhang Y. lncRNA GAS5 enhances G1 cell cycle arrest via binding to YBX1 to regulate p21 expression in stomach cancer. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:10159. doi: 10.1038/srep10159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhao X., Liu Y., Yu S. Long noncoding RNA AWPPH promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression through YBX1 and serves as a prognostic biomarker. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2017;1863:1805–1816. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zheng X., Zhang J., Fang T., Wang X., Wang S., Ma Z., Xu Y., Han C., Sun M., Xu L. The long non-coding RNA PIK3CD-AS2 promotes lung adenocarcinoma progression via YBX1-mediated suppression of p53 pathway. Oncogenesis. 2020;9:34. doi: 10.1038/s41389-020-0217-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Peng Z., Wang J., Shan B., Li B., Peng W., Dong Y., Shi W., Zhao W., He D., Duan M. The long noncoding RNA LINC00312 induces lung adenocarcinoma migration and vasculogenic mimicry through directly binding YBX1. Mol. Cancer. 2018;17:167. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0920-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhang W., Du M., Wang T., Chen W., Wu J., Li Q., Tian X., Qian L., Wang Y., Peng F. Long non-coding RNA LINC01133 mediates nasopharyngeal carcinoma tumorigenesis by binding to YBX1. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2019;9:779–790. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Levy J.M.M., Towers C.G., Thorburn A. Targeting autophagy in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2017;17:528–542. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Katheder N.S., Khezri R., O’Farrell F., Schultz S.W., Jain A., Rahman M.M., Schink K.O., Theodossiou T.A., Johansen T., Juhász G. Microenvironmental autophagy promotes tumour growth. Nature. 2017;541:417–420. doi: 10.1038/nature20815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Balbin O.A., Malik R., Dhanasekaran S.M., Prensner J.R., Cao X., Wu Y.M., Robinson D., Wang R., Chen G., Beer D.G. The landscape of antisense gene expression in human cancers. Genome Res. 2015;25:1068–1079. doi: 10.1101/gr.180596.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zheng T., Li D., He Z., Feng S., Zhao S. Long noncoding RNA NBAT1 inhibits autophagy via suppression of ATG7 in non-small cell lung cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2018;8:1801–1811. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kim I., He Y.Y. Targeting the AMP-Activated Protein Kinase for Cancer Prevention and Therapy. Front. Oncol. 2013;3:175. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Li J.Y., Luo Z.Q. LCAL1 enhances lung cancer survival via inhibiting AMPK-related antitumor functions. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2019;457:11–20. doi: 10.1007/s11010-019-03507-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sallé-Lefort S., Miard S., Nolin M.A., Boivin L., Paré M.E., Debigaré R., Picard F. Hypoxia upregulates Malat1 expression through a CaMKK/AMPK/HIF-1α axis. Int. J. Oncol. 2016;49:1731–1736. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Liu X., Xiao Z.D., Han L., Zhang J., Lee S.W., Wang W., Lee H., Zhuang L., Chen J., Lin H.K. LncRNA NBR2 engages a metabolic checkpoint by regulating AMPK under energy stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016;18:431–442. doi: 10.1038/ncb3328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Document S1. Tables S1–S4 and Figures S1 and S2
mmc1.pdf (129.9KB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus Supplemental Information
mmc2.pdf (3.1MB, pdf)

Articles from Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids are provided here courtesy of The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy

RESOURCES