Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2020 Nov 30;28(7):4030–4048. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09371-z

Targeting Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells for Premetastatic Niche Disruption After Tumor Resection

Fan Tang 1,2, Yan Tie 3, Weiqi Hong 1, Yuquan Wei 1, Chongqi Tu 2,, Xiawei Wei 1,
PMCID: PMC7703739  PMID: 33258011

Abstract

Surgical resection is a common therapeutic option for primary solid tumors. However, high cancer recurrence and metastatic rates after resection are the main cause of cancer related mortalities. This implies the existence of a “fertile soil” following surgery that facilitates colonization by circulating cancer cells. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are essential for premetastatic niche formation, and may persist in distant organs for up to 2 weeks after surgery. These postsurgical persistent lung MDSCs exhibit stronger immunosuppression compared with presurgical MDSCs, suggesting that surgery enhances MDSC function. Surgical stress and trauma trigger the secretion of systemic inflammatory cytokines, which enhance MDSC mobilization and proliferation. Additionally, damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) directly activate MDSCs through pattern recognition receptor-mediated signals. Surgery also increases vascular permeability, induces an increase in lysyl oxidase and extracellular matrix remodeling in lungs, that enhances MDSC mobilization. Postsurgical therapies that inhibit the induction of premetastatic niches by MDSCs promote the long-term survival of patients. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and β-blockade, or their combination, may minimize the impact of surgical stress on MDSCs. Anti-DAMPs and associated inflammatory signaling inhibitors also are potential therapies. Existing therapies under tumor-bearing conditions, such as MDSCs depletion with low-dose chemotherapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitors, MDSCs differentiation using all-trans retinoic acid, and STAT3 inhibition merit clinical evaluation during the perioperative period. In addition, combining low-dose epigenetic drugs with chemokine receptors, reversing immunosuppression through the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol, repairing vascular leakage, or inhibiting extracellular matrix remodeling also may enhance the long-term survival of curative resection patients.


Surgical resection is a common therapeutic option for malignant solid tumors. However, recurrence and metastatic rates after surgery are relatively high.1,2 It has been hypothesized that premetastatic niches develop in distant organs after surgery, providing “fertile soils” for circulating tumor cells (“seeds”) colonization.3,4 Recent studies have documented that after surgery, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are the key immunosuppressive cells and contribute to the postoperative development of premetastatic niches at distant sites.5 Therapies aimed at disrupting such niches may offer long-term benefits for solid tumor patients.6 However, the mechanisms involved in the postoperative premetastatic niche development have not been established, and potential therapies are still in development. Phenotyping the MDSCs recruited to distant organs after surgery and understanding the associated mechanisms may significantly inform therapeutic development. In this study, we review the roles of MDSCs in premetastatic niche formation after surgery and highlight potential anti-MDSCs therapies designed to disrupt this process. Such therapies may enhance overall survival after primary tumor resection.

MDSCs and Their Roles in Premetastatic Niche Formation

MDSCs are immature myeloid cells that exhibit immunosuppressive functions. Two categories of MDSCs have been described: granulocytic-MDSCs (G-MDSCs) and monocytic-MDSCs (M-MDSCs). In mice, MDSCs are defined as the co-expression of CD11b and Gr-1, which belong to myeloid lineage differentiation antigens. Gr-1 is composed of two different epitopes, Ly6G and Ly6C.7 Specifically, M-MDSCs are CD11b+ Ly6G Ly6Chigh, while G-MDSCs are CD11b+ Ly6G+ Ly6Clow.7 In humans, the definitive identification of MDSCs is challenging. Generally, M-MDSCs are CD14+ HLA-DR−/low, whereas G-MDSCs are CD11b+ CD15+ CD14 CD33+/low CD66b+.8 M-MDSCs are predominantly derived from peripheral blood monocytes, whereas G-MDSCs are derived from the aberrant myelopoiesis and alternative activation of mature neutrophils from peripheral blood monocytes.8 Early-stage MDSCs (e-MDSC), also proposed for lineage-negative (Lin) HLA-DRCD33+ cells, have been identified in humans.9 e-MDSCs are comprised of more immature progenitors and exhibit immune suppressive functions through Arg-1-expressing.10 Both M-MDSCs and G-MDSCs are present in distant organs and contribute to premetastatic niche formation after surgery.11,12

A premetastatic niche is a premetastatic microenvironment in distant organs that is characterized by immunosuppression, inflammation, angiogenesis, and vascular permeability, organotropism, lymph-angiogenesis, as well as reprogramming.13 Primary cancers induce premetastatic niches in the lungs and liver.14,15 MDSCs promote this induction process through their immunosuppressive, inflammatory, and angiogenic functions.16 Cytokine secretion by MDSCs alters T cell and NK-cell functions, creating a locally immunosuppressive environment. G-MDSCs suppress T-cell responses by producing reactive oxygen species (ROS) through an antigen-specific approach.17 M-MDSCs secrete large amounts of nitric oxide (NO), Arg-1 and immunosuppressive factors, such as TGF-β and IL-10 that impair antigen-specific and non-antigen specific T-cell responses.18 In addition, MDSC-secreted cytokines, such as MMP9, VEGF, and Bv8 promote neovascularization. MDSCs enhance inflammation by secreting proinflammatory cytokines or by chemoattracting other immune cells, such as macrophages.16 Given the critical role of MDSCs in premetastatic niche development, characterizing changes in MDSC numbers and function after surgery may reveal novel therapeutic approaches for postoperative metastasis.

MDSCs Persist in Distant Organs After Primary Tumor Resection

The circulating MDSC pool expands with cancer progression.19 Primary tumors secrete factors and exosomes that direct MDSCs to distant sites, thereby elevating MDSC numbers at these sites before surgical resection. In some solid tumors, presurgery circulating MDSC levels correlate with cancer recurrence rates after tumor resection.20,21 Although tumor resection suppresses tumor burden, thereby suppressing the amounts of circulating MDSCs, it does not deplete MDSCs fully.22 Preclinical studies have reported that significant numbers of functional, immunosuppressive G-MDSCs persist in the lungs for up to 2 weeks after tumor resection (Fig. 1).5,23 Animal model studies have shown that surgically stressing mice increases the number of splenic MDSCs by approximately 2.5-fold relative to controls, possibly through NK-cells impairment.24 Clinically, postsurgical elevation of circulating MDSCs has been observed in multiple solid tumors (Table 1).2531 In addition, noncancer-related surgical procedures, such as cardiac bypasses and hip replacements, are associated with MDSCs expansion.32,33 Patients exhibiting elevated MDSCs show extensive surgical tissue damage, suggesting that surgical trauma elevates MDSCs. Furthermore, primary tumor resection enhances the immunosuppressive functions of MDSCs. For example, in an allograft tumor model, CD11b+ CD33+ HLA-DR MDSCs isolated 24 h after lung cancer surgery were found to be more potent at inducing angiogenesis and tumor growth compared with presurgery MDSCs.25 After tumor resection, infiltrating MDSCs induce epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastases by upregulating TGF-β, VEGF, and IL-10 signaling.34 Postsurgical MDSC expansion is associated with impaired cellular immunity that increases metastatic risk.35 In colorectal cancer, surgical stress impairs IFN-γ secretion by NK cells, possibly due to the expansion of CD14+ monocytic cells (M-MDSCs).11 Colorectal cancer surgery expands the G-MDSCs pool, which in turn elevate scavenger receptor expression by NK cells. Moreover, postoperative lipid accumulation due to scavenger receptor expression by NK cells is associated with increased postoperative metastases.12 Mouse models have revealed that surgical stress enhances the MDSC numbers while suppressing the number of tumor-associated, antigen-specific, CD8+ T cells that produce IFN-γ.36 Therefore, both G-MDSCs and M-MDSCs are essential in the establishment of premetastatic microenvironments after primary tumor resection. A comprehensive, postsurgical characterization of MDSCs and elucidation of their underlying mechanisms may reveal novel strategies for improving postoperative cancer outcomes.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Surgical resection and postoperative premetastatic niche. Under tumor-bearing conditions, primary tumors secrete cytokines, including growth factors, chemokines that mobilize and recruit MDSCs into the tumor microenvironment. During the progression of primary tumors, tumor-derived secretory factors and exosomes mediate the movement of MDSCs into distant organs for premetastatic niche formation. After tumor resection, the circulating MDSC levels are decreased in some tumors. However, the 2-week period after surgery is accompanied by stress responses and immune dysfunctions with large cytokine level alterations. During the 2-week period after surgery, persistent MDSCs with enhanced immunosuppression by surgical stress and trauma in distant organs, such as the lung or liver are critical for premetastatic niche formation, which determine the long-term survival of patients subjected to local tumor resection

Table 1.

Clinical evidence confirming the elevation and enhanced immunosuppressive function of MDSCs after surgery

Disease Surgery MDSCs subtype Biological function of MDSCs Reference
Lung cancer Thoracotomy CD11b+CD33+HLA-DR MDSCs More efficient in promoting angiogenesis and tumor growth than MDSCs isolated before surgical operation 25
Lung cancer Thoracotomy CD11b+CD33+HLA-DRCD14+MDSCs Surgery-induced M-MDSCs were more efficient in suppressing T-cell proliferation, more potent in expending Treg when cocultured with autologous T cells in vitro 26
Bladder cancer Radical cystectomy Lin CD11b+ CD33+ MDSCs Every unit increase in MDSC count from surgery to 2 day postoperatively, the odds of infection rate 90 day after surgery increased by 2.5% 27
Gastric cancer Resection surgery CD14+ HLA-DR CD11b+ CD33+ MDSCs Produced IDO and arginase and suppressed T cell functions 28
Prostate cancer Radical prostatectomy CD14HLA-DRCD33+CD11b+ MDSCs 29
Breast Cancer Radical or partial mastectomy CD33+HLA-DR CD15+CD11b+ MDSCs Increased levels of MDSC levels were associated with decreases in the number of NK cells 30
Esophageal cancer Radical resection G-MDSC A high level of G-MDSCs can be used to determine the incidence of sepsis in preoperative esophageal cancer patients 31
Non-cancer disease Hip arthroplasty CD11b+CD14+CD33+HLA-DRlow MDSCs Surgery evoked a coordinated functional response that was restricted to 6 major intracellular signaling molecules (STAT1, STAT 3, STAT 5, p38, S6, CREB) 32
Cardiopulmonary Bypass CD15+CD11b+CD14HLA-DRMDSCs MDSCs expansion was related to the impairment of T cell proliferation, cytotoxicity, and IFN-γ secretion 33

Mechanisms of MDSCs Infiltration After Primary Tumor Resection

The mechanisms underlying MDSCs persistence in distant organs after surgery have not been fully established. After surgery, the expansion, recruitment, and differentiation of MDSCs is regulated by various factors, such as cytokines and chemokines. Anesthetics and hormones, including catecholamines, glucocorticoids, and prostaglandin secretion in response to surgical stress, promote MDSC expansion.3740 In addition, surgery may lead to unavoidable soft tissue damage and release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) into circulation. In turn, DAMPs trigger local and systemic inflammatory responses, promoting MDSCs mobilization. Furthermore, some DAMPs may directly recruit and activate MDSCs, thereby enhancing their immunosuppressive functions. In the following section, we discuss the impacts of surgery on MDSC numbers and functions (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Molecular mechanisms of surgical procedures on mobilizing and enhancing functions of MDSCs. Surgical stress activates HPA axis, leading to catecholamine secretion. The catecholamines interact with AR on MDSCs that activate STAT3. In addition, high amounts of cytokines, such as IL-6, VEGF et al. activate STAT3 within MDSCs. Besides, DAMPs released after surgical trauma are recognized by PPR, especially TLR4 or RAGE that activate NF-κB. Secretion of COX-2 enhances PGE-2 synthesis, which activates NF-κB by upregulating RIPK3. Activation of the two key transcription factors (STAT3 and NF-κB) lead to the escalation of a downstream cascade. Highly activated STAT3 prevent MDSCs from rapidly differentiating into dendritic cells and macrophages. The elevated COX-2, secreted by MDSCs, lead to a positive feedback with PGE-2 and RIPK3 signal. Moreover, elevated Arg-1 and PD-L1 expression after STAT3 and NF-κB activation enhances the immunosuppressive function of MDSCs. Finally, the expression of anti-apoptotic gene (Bcl-2) improves the survival of MDSCs

Surgical Stress Promotes MDSCs Expansion

Tumor resection is associated with relative degrees of physical, physiological, and psychological stress. Surgical stresses, as well as anesthesia, are associated with MDSC expansion. Dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenoceptor agonist induces postoperative M-MDSC proliferation in lung cancer patients. Dexmedetomidine-induced MDSC expansion promotes tumor metastasis by enhancing VEGF expression.37 Surgical stress activates the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, elevating catecholamines and glucocorticoid levels. Because MDSCs express the receptors for these hormones, their functions may be altered by exposure to them. Catecholamine interactions with adrenergic receptors (AR) on MDSCs activate β2-AR signaling that enhances MDSCs proliferation. By proliferating, their immunosuppressive functions also are elevated. β-AR antagonists suppress MDSCs proliferation.38 In vitro studies have shown that MDSCs accumulation after host trauma is induced by glucocorticoids. For example, a murine trauma model revealed that endogenous glucocorticoids promote MDSC expansion.39 Furthermore, glucocorticoid receptor signaling suppresses HIF-1α and HIF-1α-dependent glycolysis in MDSCs, promoting their immunosuppressive activities.41 Prostaglandins (PG) play key roles in inflammatory responses, and their levels are significantly elevated in inflamed tissues or surgical sites. PG induces MDSCs and their suppressive functions. PG biosynthesis from arachidonate is modulated by cyclooxygenase (COX) isoenzymes and is blocked by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including selective COX-2 inhibitors.40

Surgical Trauma Releases DAMPs to Activate, Expand, and Recruit MDSCs

Surgical trauma is accompanied by inevitable soft tissue damage and release of numerous internal signals (DAMPs) into circulation. These internal danger signals induce innate immune responses and systemic inflammation. Some DAMPs function as direct chemoattractants and recruit MDSCs. For example, S100A8/A9 (also calprotectin or MRP8/14) is a heterocomplex of 2 S100 calcium binding proteins. These S100 alarmins released after surgery are MDSC potent chemoattractants.42 In addition, S100 activates serum amyloid A3, which directly recruits MDSCs into the lungs, facilitating metastasis.43 High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is an evolutionarily ancient nuclear protein that regulates various intracellular and extracellular processes. HMGB1 secretion after tissue damage modulates signaling pathways that attenuate T-lymphocyte responses and enhance MDSC expansion.44 In colon cancer, elevated HMGB1 levels released into the peritoneal cavity recruit vast amounts of MDSCs, promoting peritoneal metastasis after curative surgery.45 HSP70, another important DAMP, effectively suppresses G-MDSC and M-MDSC populations.46 In addition, DAMPs extracellular ATP enhances MDSC dysfunction through the ATP receptor (P2 × 7R) and NLRP3 inflammasome activation.47 Complement factors also are secreted during surgical trauma. Studies in mouse models have shown that C5a receptors, C5a-R1, and C5a-R2 elevate MDSC levels in melanoma. C5aR1 knockout suppressed the in vivo levels of MDSCs, macrophages, and regulatory T lymphocytes.48

When DAMPs reach distant organs, such as lungs, their clearance by host immune cells is followed by the activation of inflammatory or pyroptosis signals. During this process, the secretion of the NLRP3 inflammasome, NF-κB transcription, and IL-1β is upregulated. IL-1β enhances the generation, accumulation, and activity of MDSCs by activating IL-1β-inducible growth factors, cytokines, CXCR2-directed chemokines, and adhesion molecules that are associated with G-MDSC infiltration.49 Specifically, the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, NF-κB and IL-1β elevates chemokine secretion, including CXCLs or CCLs that recruit MDSCs into the premetastatic niches.50

DAMPs recognition by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) on MDSCs triggers a cascade of events that involve NF-κB and STAT3. These events activate MDSCs and enhances MDSC-mediated cell migration and immunosuppression (Fig. 2). For instance, the downstream mediators of DAMP signaling, such as prostaglandin E2 (PGE-2) and IL-10, induce immunosuppressive MDSCs. In a mouse model of mammary carcinoma, S100A8/A9 bound to a receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) on MDSCs, promoting their migration and accumulation through NF-kB signaling.42 STAT3 upregulates the S100A8/9 proinflammatory proteins, which enhances MDSCs accumulation in a feedback loop. Elevated S100A8/9 levels suppress myeloid progenitor cell differentiation. HMGB1 enhances MDSC viability by driving them into a proautophagic state.51 In addition, MDSCs recruited into the pre-metastatic lungs through the C5a/C5a R1 axis modulate premetastatic angiogenesis.52

Surgery-Induced Cytokines Enhance MDSC Mobilization and Function

Surgical stress and trauma activates cytokines that initiate MDSC mobilization and their immunosuppressive activities. These cytokines, including interleukins, growth factors, colony-stimulating factor (CSF), and chemokines, are immediately elevated after surgery. They promote MDSC generation, chemotaxis, and activity (Table 2).5385 TNF-α expression is elevated soon after surgical trauma. It activates an inflammatory cascade. TNF-R2 signaling promotes MDSC survival and peripheral accumulation by upregulating cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP) and suppressing caspase-8 activity.70 Proinflammatory cytokine levels, including IL-6, G-CSF, and CCL2, are elevated within hours after surgery.86 In the lungs, IL-6 interacts with IL-6R on MDSCs to activate STAT3 transcriptional activity, thereby promoting premetastatic niche formation and immunosuppression.54 STAT3 activation by IL-6 and other cytokines, such as IL-10, hepatocyte growth factor, and CSF, enhances Arg-1 and PD-L1 expression by MDSCs. STAT3 activation also elevates the expression of Bcl-2 that enhances MDSCs survival. Surgical trauma elevates G-CSF and GM-CSF levels, thereby inducing MDSCs. G-CSF treatment enhances MDSCs infiltration and elevates the expression of immunosuppressive factors, including Arg-1, IL-10, and ROS.60 Circulating levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), which is expressed in the liver, are significantly elevated during inflammation. CRP serum levels rapidly rise from approximately ≤ 3 µg/ml to > 500 µg/ml in response to proinflammatory cytokine stimulation. CRP has been shown enhance MDSC numbers and activity in vivo.87 In a cancer mouse model, VEGF was shown to promote the accumulation of Gr1+CD11b+ cells by interacting with VEGF-R2 and activating JAK2 and STAT3.88 PGE-2 modulates the in vivo development and activities of MDSCs.89,90 It enhances the nuclear accumulation of NF-κB in M-MDSC that divert their response to IFN-γ towards NO-mediated immunosuppression.91

Table 2.

Cytokines released after surgery promoted the mobilization and enhanced the function of MDSCs

Cytokines Name Biological function in MDSCs Biological function in surgery
Interleukins IL-6 IL-6 potentially expands peripheral MDSCs;53 major cytokine among IL-6 family cytokines responsible for STAT3 activation and premetastatic niche54 Main proinflammatory cytokine responds to surgery and the magnitude of IL-6 elevation correlates with the extent of surgical trauma severity; the elevation of IL-6 associated with postoperative adverse outcome55,84
IL-8 Attracts MDSCs and elicits extrusion of neutrophil extracellular traps56 Proinflammatory cytokine responds to surgical stress57
Colony-stimulating factors (CSF) GM-CSF Recruit and expand MDSCs, promote migration and differentiation of MDSCs58 GM-CSF ameliorates microvascular barrier integrity via pericyte-derived Ang-1 during wound healing59
G-CSF Mobilize G-MDSCs to the lung pre-metastatic niche60 Angiogenic circulating factor responding to surgery61
Chemokines CXCL1 Recruits CXCR2-positive MDSCs to form a premetastatic niche, promoting liver metastases62 Proangiogenic chemokine, that participate wound healing
CCL2 CCL2/CCR2 axis is important for MDSC recruitment63 Evaluation of CCL2 help guide postsurgical management for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma patients64
SDF-1/CXCL 12 SDF-1/CXCR4-mediated recruitment of MDSCs from bone marrow65 Chemokine, involving wound healing66
Growth factors VEGF Activate NF-κB signals, producing CXCL1 to recruit CXCR2+ MDSC62 One of the most potent proangiogenic factors during wounds healing67
Interferon IFN-γ IFN-γ significantly upregulated iNOS expression in M-MDSCs68 Mediating postoperative proinflammatory responses69
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) TNF-α Cytokine attracting neutrophils and monocytes to pre-metastatic niche; Signaling of TNF-R2 promoted MDSC survival through upregulation of c-FLIP and inhibition of caspase-8 activity70 First cytokine responding to injury, trigger an inflammatory cascade. Endogenous wound TNF-α down-regulates collagen synthesis during normal wound healing71
Transforming growth factor (TGF) TGF-β Factor secreted by MDSCs, that with strong immunosuppressive function166 TGF-β exhibits two postoperative peaks of secretion at 2 h and 3–4 days. Stimulates angiogenesis and fibroblast proliferation72
Extracellular matrix MMP9 MMP-9-cleaved OPN fragment, OPN-32 kDa, was responsible for MDSCs expansion73 Serum MMP-9 increased significantly 4 days after surgery and was still high 30 days after surgery; play a role in normal tissue remodeling events74
LOX Promote the ECM remodeling to recruit MDSC75 A key enzyme required for crosslinking and deposition of insoluble collagen, and targeting LOX might be an approach to reduce adhesions76
Fibronectin Fibronectin is a large glycoprotein capable of interacting with various ECM molecules produced by a variety of cell types and involved in cell attachment and chemotaxis79 ECM derived DAMPs after surgery that activate inflammation and monocyte activation; also participated in wound healing80
DAMPs S100A8/9 S100A8/A9 imaging reflected MDSC abundance and the establishment of an immunosuppressive environment in premetastatic lung tissue77,78 Causing neutrophil migration to inflammatory sites; a biomarker of postoperative organ injury85
Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase COX-2 Catalyzed the synthesis of PGE-2, which exacerbated the immunosuppressive activity of MDSC81 An enzyme responsible for the production of PGs that respond to surgical stress82

Surgically activated chemokines recruit MDSCs to distant organs. They also induce MDSCs development in the bone marrow and maintenance of their immunosuppressive activity.92 In colon cancer, surgical trauma promotes tumor progression by downregulating CXCL4 while promoting MDSC recruitment.93 IL-8, a proinflammatory cytokine, and main CXCR2 ligand, is elevated within hours after surgery. It chemotactically recruits MDSC by interacting with CXCR2.56 In cancer patients, CXCR2 chemokine receptor agonists lead to the extrusion of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) by neutrophils, and G-MDSCs.94 The CCL2/CCR2 signaling axis recruits M-MDSCs to distant organs. Under surgical stress, CCL2 levels rise and remain high for approximately 2 months after surgery.95

Surgery Promotes Extracellular Matrix Remodeling

The immediate effects of tumor resection are associated with extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, causing the lungs to be more vulnerable to metastasis. ECM remodeling is mediated by lysyl oxidase (LOX), a copper-dependent amine oxidase that catalyzes an important enzymatic step in collagen crosslinking.96 In the premetastatic niche, LOX-mediated collagen IV crosslinking in the basement membrane is essential for MDSCs recruitment.97 In response to surgery, elevated LOX plasma levels promote lung ECM remodeling, raising the risk of tumor cell seeding during the immediate post-operative period. Blocking the activity of LOX in peripheral blood suppresses tumor cell seeding in lungs. This study emphasizes the essential role of ECM remodeling in promoting tumor cell seeding after surgery; there are no changes in CD11b+ cells colonizing the premetastatic sites, as well as pulmonary permeability.75 Solid tumor surgeries elevate plasma LOX levels, thereby promoting lung ECM remodeling. Therapeutically targeting the LOX family members may prevent metastases and cancer progression after tumor resection.

Surgery Enhances MDSC Infiltration by Promoting Vascular Permeability

Surgically induced local inflammation and neutrophil infiltration in the lungs is associated with elevated vascular permeability.98 In turn, higher pulmonary vascular permeability promotes MDSCs infiltration, which promotes vascular permeability by secreting MMP9 into the premetastatic lungs.99 Therefore, increased vascular permeability is a key step in MDSCs settlement. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) is a DNA sensor that can be activated by endogenous DNA, including extranuclear chromatin and mitochondrial DNA. Activation of cGAS signaling leads to an innate immune response that preserves organismal homeostasis.100 Transcriptional regulators Yes-associated protein (YAP) and its paralog TAZ are the major downstream proteins of the Hippo signaling pathway, which is critical for endothelial homeostasis.101 Release of large amounts of circulating mitochondrial DNA due to surgical trauma activates cGAS signaling and suppresses YAP-mediated endothelial cell proliferation. These effects promote vascular inflammation.102 This process enhances vascular leakage and, therefore, MDSCs mobilization to distant organs. Surgical trauma-induced proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, mediate pulmonary vascular permeability in a two-hit model of ventilator-associated lung injury.103 Anti-inflammation suppresses proinflammatory cytokine secretion and maintains vessel permeability.104 Surgical activation of the complement system triggers a cascade of events that promote vascular permeability.105 In this process, neutrophils, recruited by C5a, secrete ROS, PG and leukotriene.106 Therapeutic options that repair leaking vessels in the premetastatic niche have been shown to prevent the outgrowth of circulating cancer cells while sensitizing lung metastases to immunotherapy.107

Therapies Targeting MDSCs for Premetastatic Niche Disruption After Surgery

Potential therapeutic strategies against persistent MDSCs in distant organs include direct anti-MDSC therapies and therapies aimed at minimizing the impact of surgery on MDSCs. Depleting MDSCs using low-dose chemotherapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitors suppresses MDSC chemotaxis and proliferation, while reversing the immunosuppressive functions of MDSCs (Table 3). Additionally, anti-postoperative MDSC therapy should be considered, because the perioperative period is associated with a heightened risk of complications, including infections and slow wound healing due to immunosuppression.

Table 3.

Possible and rational therapies targeting MDSCs for pre-metastatic niche disruption after tumor resection

Strategies Drugs Clinical trial Mechanisms Reference
Anti-surgical stress β-blockade (Propranolol) NCT03152786/NCT02013492 Block the β2-AR signal in MDSCs 109
COX-2 inhibitor (Celecoxib, Etodolac) NCT03896113/NCT03864575/NCT03838029 Disruption of the COX-2/PGE-2 signals; reducing MDSC recruitment and differentiation, repressing MDSC-associated suppressive factors such as Arg-1 and ROS production 81
Anti-DAMPs Anti-HMGB 1 antibody Preclinical Ameliorated the trauma-induced attenuated T-cell responses and accumulation of MDSCs in the spleens seen 2 days after injury 44
S100A8/A9 neutralizing antibody Preclinical Neutralizing extracellular S100A8/A9 119
Anti-inflammatory signals NF-κB inhibitor (BAY11-7082) Preclinical Inhibiting NF-κB mediated CXCL1, CXCL2 and CXCL5 production, that reduce the chemotaxis of MDSCs; Inhibition NLRP3 inflammasome activation and the increased pyroptosis 124
NLRP3 inhibitor (MCC950/CY-09/OLT1177/Tranilast/Oridonin) Preclinical Inhibition NLRP3 inflammasome activation and the following IL-1β secretion 121
IL-1β (Anakinra) NCT02780583/NCT04359784 Inhibit the IL-1β inducing CCL5, CXCL12, CCL2, and CXCL5 expression 50
Epigenetic drugs HDAC (Entinostat) NCT01207726/NCT03501381/NCT03552380 Downregulating CCR2 and CXCR2 expression; promoting MDSC differentiation into a more-interstitial macrophage-like phenotype 5
DMNT (5-azacytidine) NCT01207726/NCT03709550
Depletion of MDSCs Chemotherapy (Gemcitabine/5-FU) NCT04331626/NCT01803152/NCT02090101 Depletes G-MDSCs, M-MDSCs, macrophages, and eosinophils 142
TKI(Pazopanib/Bevacizumab) NCT01832259/NCT01218048 Blockade of VEGF and c-KIT signaling; inhibit STAT3 129
Differentiating MDSCs ARTA NCT02403778 Inhibits retinoic signaling to shift the differentiation of MDSC into mature myeloid cells, such as macrophages and dendritic cells 147
Blocking MDSCs trafficking CXCR2 inhibitor (AZD5069, Reparixin, SX-682) NCT03161431/NCT02499328/NCT02370238 Inhibit CXCR2 mediated MDSCs trafficking 94
CCR2 inhibitor (BMS-813160, RS504393) NCT04123379/NCT03767582/NCT03496662 Improved the prognosis by blocking chemotaxis of M-MDSCs 142
Inhibit MDSCs activity Stat3 inhibitor (AZD9150) NCT02499328 A marked decrease in G-MDSC within the peripheral blood mononuclear cells 158
NF-κB inhibitor (BAY11-7082) Pre-clinical Inhibit the activated NF-kB signal induced by DAMPs-PRR interaction 42
Targeting the ECM remodeling LOX inhibitor (β-aminopropionitrile) Pre-clinical Reduce the surgery induced hypoxia related LOX, and ECM remodeling 161
Repair vascular leakage IL-6 inhibitor (Tocilizumab) NCT04370834) Inhibit IL-6 mediated inflammatory response the repair the vascular leakage 164
C5 antibody (Ravulizumab) NCT04369469 Inhibit the C5a-C5R signal on vascular endothelial cells 165
Restore the immunity after surgery TGF-β inhibitor (LY3200882/LY2157299/EW-7197) NCT04031872/NCT03143985/NCT02452008 Reverse the MDSC secreted TGF-β mediated immunosuppression 166
PDE5 inhibitor (Sildenafil, Tadalafil) NCT02544880 Targeting MDSC expression and function of Arg-1 and iNOS 167169
ERAS NCT02644603 Pre-rehabilitation, nutrition, pain management to rapid restore immunity after surgery 172

Reduced Surgical Stress Induces MDSCs Activation

Propranolol Short perioperative periods, days to weeks around surgery, are characterized by stress-inflammatory responses, including the secretion of catecholamines and prostaglandins.108 Catecholamines activate AR which are presented by all cell types, including MDSCs. Among these signals, β2-AR enhances MDSC accumulation and survival through STAT3 phosphorylation. Following STAT3 activation, MDSCs elevate the expression of pro-survival and immunosuppressive genes, such as Bcl-2 and Arg-1.38 Therefore, catecholamine suppression minimizes immunosuppression in the microenvironment by inhibiting MDSC recruitment.109 Propranolol, a pan β-AR blocker, significantly slows tumor growth in a β2-AR dependent manner. Perioperative application of propranolol disrupts premetastatic niche formation after surgery. Propranolol administration attenuates the elevation of MDSCs, indicating that after surgery, catecholamines promote MDSCs function.110 Ongoing clinical trials aim to elucidate the efficacy of β-blockers after tumor resection (NCT03152786) or in advanced, inoperable cancers (NCT02013492).

COX-2 inhibitor During trauma, COX-2 modulates immune functions by inducing PGE-2 production, which activates NF-κB signaling in a positive feedback loop that enhances COX-2 expression in MDSCs.111 Inhibition of COX-2 or PGE-2 reverses the immunosuppressive activity of MDSC and suppresses tumorigenesis.81 In mouse models, a selective COX-2 inhibitor (NS398) was shown to decrease significantly the percentage of MDSCs in the spleen and bone marrow within 48 and 72 h after traumatic stress, respectively. NS398 also inhibits arginase activity and downregulates Arg-1 expression by splenic MDSCs, thereby enhancing proliferation while inhibiting apoptosis in CD4 + T cells.112 Modulation of chemokine CXCL12 and its receptor CXCR4 by PGE-2 attracts MDSC into the tumor microenvironment. Inhibition of the COX-2 or PGE-2 receptors EP2/EP4 suppresses CXCR4 expression and MDSC responsiveness to CXCL12.113 Celecoxib, a COX-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, is used for pain and inflammation control in the perioperative period. This drug suppresses the in vitro and in vivo PGE-2 levels. Treatment of tumor-bearing mice with dietary celecoxib prevents local and systemic expansion of MDSCs.114, 115 Based the potential of the COX-2 inhibitor to regulate immune response, clinical trials are evaluating its effect (NCT03896113, NCT03864575).

Combining COX-2 inhibition and β-blockade has potential immunological and clinical benefits after cancer surgery.116 In breast cancer, the administration of propranolol and etodola, a PG inhibitor was shown to reduce IL-6, CRP, and IFN-γ serum levels, as well as the activity of multiple inflammation-related transcription factors, including NF-κB and STAT3.117 In a phase-II, randomized, clinical trial involving breast cancer patients subjected to tumor resection, the simultaneous inhibition of β-adrenergic and COX-2 pathways in the perioperative period was associated with improved long-term survival rates.118 A phase II, clinical trial is being performed in Israel to evaluate the efficacy of β-adrenergic blockade and COX-2 inhibition against metastasis in primary pancreatic cancer patients undergoing surgery. This trial is based on results from animal studies showing that the β-adrenergic blocker, propranolol, in combination with etodola (but neither drug alone), effectively suppressed postoperative metastasis (NCT03838029).

Anti-DAMPs and Related Pyroptosis/Inflammatory Signaling

Anti-DAMPs The release of DAMPs after surgical trauma is associated with the accumulation and activation of MDSCs. Therapies that clear these intrinsic alarmins may suppress MDSC levels. Preclinical studies suggest that a monoclonal antibody that directly neutralizes DAMPs may prevent MDSCs accumulation. For example, an anti-HMGB1 monoclonal antibody was found to improve trauma-induced T-cell response attenuation and MDSC accumulation within 2 days after injury.44 Extracellular S100A8/A9 upregulates various inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Kinoshita et al. developed a neutralizing anti-S100A8/A9 antibody for blocking “seed and soil” cross-talk and found that it efficiently suppressed organ tropic metastasis.119 Given that numerous DAMPs are released after surgery, the feasibility for the application of neutralizing antibodies is limited. Therefore, therapies targeting the downstream inflammatory signals are better options in the perioperative period.

IL-1β blockade IL-1β is secreted by host immune cells to promote DAMPs clearance. It has been associated with MDSC accumulation and NK-cells immunosuppression.120 IL-1β expressing tumor cells express higher levels of G-CSF, multiple CXC chemokines, and vascular adhesion molecules that mediate G-MDSCs infiltration and enhance angiogenic and immunosuppressive properties.49 Activation of MDSCs by IL-1β enhances their immunosuppressive activities through NF-κB signaling. Therefore, IL-1β inhibition may suppress MDSCs infiltration and function. Anakinra is an IL-1R antagonist that inhibits distal metastasis by blocking pyroptosis/IL-1β signaling. Anakinra suppresses the recruitment of M2-macrophages and MDSCs by inhibiting CCL2, CCL5 and CXCL5 secretion.50 Anakinra is under clinical trials for a certain inflammatory disease (NCT02780583) and for the control of inflammatory cytokine release (NCT04359784). Although it has not been tested in cancer, its perioperative uses may suppress immediate post-operative MDSCs accumulation in the lungs.

NLRP3 inhibitor The release of vast amounts of DAMPs after surgical trauma activates NLRP3 signaling in host immune cells and MDSCs. A preclinical study found that pharmacologic inhibition of NLRP3 suppressed G-MDSC tumor infiltration and significantly enhanced anti-PD-1 efficacy. The NLRP3 inflammasome was highlighted as a potential therapeutic avenue for reducing MDSCs infiltration and immunosuppression.121 Although some small molecules have been identified as NLPR3 inhibitors, few of them have been tested in clinical trials. These molecules include MCC950, CY-09, OLT1177, Tranilast and Oridonin, which exhibit therapeutic potentials by directly targeting NLRP3.122 More studies needed to determine whether these drugs inhibit postoperative MDSCs and their clinical efficacies in tumor resection patients.

NF-κB inhibitor NF-κB signaling is critical for the activation of MDSCs and maintaining their immunosuppressive functions. Activation of RAGE-mediated p38 MAPK and TLR4-mediated NF-κB signaling is implicated in S100A9-induced MDSC chemotaxis and activation.123 In addition, it is an important signal involving DAMPs-induced inflammatory responses. NF-κB activation in host immune cells promotes secretion of chemokines that recruit MDSCs. Other cytokines also mediate MDSC accumulation by relying on this signal. A preclinical study established that BAY11-7082, an NF-κB inhibitor, suppresses the secretion of CXCL1, CXCL2, and CXCL8. These chemokines mediate CXCR2+ MDSC recruitment.124 Although this drug is still under preclinical evaluation, it has exhibited a therapeutic potential in eliminating the postoperative premetastatic niche.

Suppressing MDSC Numbers After Surgery

Gemcitabine Reduced-dose treatment with gemcitabine eliminates MDSC and other immunosuppressive cells. In vivo experiments in a mouse model found that despite early tumor resection, animals died of local recurrence and distant metastasis. However, adjuvant gemcitabine treatment after tumor resection prolonged survival by inhibiting MDSCs accumulation and increasing the number of NK cells at the resection margin.125 Treatment with gemcitabine after primary tumor resection has been shown to decrease residual G-MDSCs in the lungs and suppress metastasis.23 A phase IV, open, nonrandomized, single-arm, single-center study is underway. This study aims at establishing the safety and efficacy of half-dose gemcitabine in combination with anti-PD-1 antibody in non-small cell lung cancer (NCT04331626). Gemcitabine pretreatment may enhance the efficacy of dendritic cell vaccines after tumor resection, helping eliminate immunosuppressive cells. The synergistic effects of dendritic cell vaccines and gemcitabine in sarcoma are under evaluation in adults and children (NCT01803152). In this clinical trial, following tumor resection, participants undergo pheresis to isolate monocytes, which are then used to grow dendritic cells. Dendritic cell vaccination is then done 2 weeks after the third low-dose gemcitabine administration, and MDSC levels monitored.

5-fluorouracil Low-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was found to inhibit systemic and lung accumulation of MDSC in tumor-bearing mice.126 5-FU mediated MDSC depletion was relatively strong when compared to gemcitabine and selectively triggered MDSC apoptosis in vitro and in vivo.127 5-FU, alone or in combination with bevacizumab, rapidly depletes circulating MDSCs and activates caspase 1.128 5-FU triggered IL-1 expression is detected in serum 24 h after treatment. A phase II clinical trial is being performed to evaluate the impact of 5-FU, bevacizumab, and Anakinra on liver metastases and vascularization in metastatic colorectal cancer (NCT02090101). However, even with low-dose chemotherapy, postsurgical immunosuppression complications including slow wound-healing and infection should be carefully considered.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors VEGF is an important pro-angiogenic factor. VEGF causes immune dysfunctions by inhibiting T-cell activity, and promoting MDSC recruitment.129 VEGFR-1+ cells promote metastases by establishing premetastatic niches.130 By inhibiting myelopoiesis, antiangiogenic factors indirectly suppress MDSC levels. Pazopanib, a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), decreases VEGFR-1+ MDSCs in pelvic lymph nodes, the most frequent sites of prostate cancer metastasis, disrupting premetastatic niches, and improving clinical outcomes.131 Presurgical treatment with cetuximab, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, has undergone clinical trials in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (NCT01218048). Patients who responded to this treatment exhibited a significant decrease in G-MDSC levels.132 TYRO3, AXL, and MERTK impact on the activities of MDSC and are promising targets for reversing MDSC-mediated immunosuppression in cancer.133 Ibrutinib, a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase and IL-2-inducible kinase, suppresses tumor development and metastasis in breast cancer by inducing MDSCs differentiation into mature dendritic cells.134 Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody, effectively reduces adhesion after first sternotomy by downregulating CD31, and therefore, inhibiting VEGF-induced angiogenesis.135 Low-dose capecitabine, in combination with bevacizumab is well tolerated and has been associated with low levels of circulating MDSCs, as well as elevated cytotoxic immune cell infiltration into the tumor microenvironment.128 This shows that TKIs may be effective in MDSCs management after surgery and might improve long term survival outcomes. However, more studies regarding the dosage and timing of TKI administration are needed, so as to minimize wound healing complications.

Blocking the Recruitment of MDSCs After Surgery

CXCR2 Blockade The chemotaxis factor, CXCR2, is essential for G-MDSC recruitment. Anti-CXCR2 and anti-PD-1 have been shown to synergistically reduce tumor mass and enhance CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell infiltration.136 Three CXCR1/2 antagonists (SX-682, reparixin, and MK-7123) are being evaluated in clinical trials as adjunctive cancer therapies. SX-682 is an orally bioavailable small-molecule inhibitor of CXCR1/2 that blocks MDSC recruitment while enhancing T-cell activation. SX-682 significantly inhibits G-MDSCs trafficking without altering CXCR2 ligand expression.137 Preclinical studies have shown that the inhibition of G-MDSC trafficking by SX-682 enhances T-cell based immunotherapy, indicating a potential benefit against MDSC-infiltrated cancers.138 A study (NCT03161431) is being performed to determine whether SX-682 blocks MDSCs recruitment into tumors. Reparixin is designed to target CXCL8-CXCR1 signaling in cancer stem cells and is now in a Phase II clinical trial for triple-negative breast cancer (NCT02370238). AZD5069 is a selective small-molecule antagonist of human CXCR2 chemokine receptor with a greater than 100-fold selectivity over CXCR1 receptors.139 This drug is in Phase Ib/II trials for advanced solid tumors and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (NCT02499328).

CCR2 inhibitor The CCL2-CCR2 chemokine axis mediates M-MDSCs recruitment into distant organs, contributing to the creation of a pre-metastatic niche.140 Pro-pagermanium is a CCL2 inhibitor used in Japan for chronic hepatitis B treatment. It has been shown to inhibit metastasis by suppressing premetastatic niche formation.141 A CCR2 antagonist, RS 504393, improved prognosis by blocking M-MDSCs chemotaxis.142 It has been proven that the CCR2 inhibitor alone does not improve overall survival outcomes in mice models after tumor resection. However, when combined with other drugs, including epigenetic drugs that suppress CCR2 expression by MDSCs, the treatment synergistically prolonged mice survival after tumor resection.5 The CCR2 inhibitor (BMS-813160) is under clinical evaluation, in combination with immunotherapy or chemotherapy against solid cancers (NCT03496662, NCT03767582, NCT04123379).

DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors Epigenetics is an important modulator of gene expression. Epigenetic events modulate chronic inflammatory responses making them potential therapeutic targets.143 MDSC phenotype development has been shown to be enhanced by HDAC2-mediated epigenetic silencing of the retinoblastoma gene.144 In trauma patients, MDSC mediated immunosuppression develops over time, and is associated with specific epigenome modulation.145 Valproic acid, a HDAC inhibitor, downregulates CCR2 expression on M-MDSCs thereby suppressing M-MDSC infiltration. Valproic acid also relieves the immunosuppressive effects of MDSCs on CD8+ T cells and NK cells, enhancing their activation in tumors.146 Adjuvant epigenetic therapy using low-dose DNA methyltransferase (5-azacytidine) and histone deacetylase (Entinostat) inhibitors disrupts the premetastatic niche by downregulating CCR2 and CXCR2, thereby inhibiting MDSC recruitment and promoting their differentiation into macrophage-like cells.5 A combination of low-dose adjuvant epigenetic therapy and CCR2 antagonists synergistically enhance disease-free and overall survival outcomes. Most epigenetic drugs are not approved for mono-therapeutic use in solid tumors. This is because they exhibit limited clinical efficacies and severe toxicities at high doses. Therefore, using low doses that suffice to reprogram MDSCs, in combination with other anticancer agents, may provide effective treatment options, while minimizing toxicity.

MDSCs Differentiation After Surgery

All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) ATRA is a derivative of vitamin A that has been shown to strongly eliminate MDSCs in mice models and in cancer patients. ATRA enhances MDSC differentiation into mature myeloid cells by neutralizing high ROS levels.147 It also activates the genes responsible for cell differentiation that are less likely to favor tumor growth by differentiating MDSCs into dendritic cells, granulocytes, and monocytes.148 Treating a mouse sarcoma model with ATRA significantly eradicated M-MDSCs and diminished the immunosuppressive effects of G-MDSCs.149 ATRA administration reverted anti-VEGFR-2-induced accumulation of intratumoral MDSC, and counteracted the disorganization of tumor microvessels.148 Epigenetic drugs also have exhibited the potential to differentiate MDSCs.5 A randomized, phase II, clinical trial of advanced melanoma treatment with ipilimumab alone or in combination with ATRA is underway (NCT02403778).

Targeting the Intrinsic Signals Responsible for MDSCs Activation

STAT3 inhibitors As a critical transcription factor, STAT3 promotes cell proliferation, anti-apoptosis, angiogenesis, metastasis, and immune evasion.150 STAT3 activation mediates MDSC survival and immunosuppressive functions. For example, M-MDSC-driven immunosuppression in pancreatic ductal carcinoma is mediated by STAT3.151 Galiellalactone, a STAT3 inhibitor, suppresses M-MDSC development and immunosuppression.152 STAT3 phosphorylation mediates the expression of Arg-1. Stattic, a STAT3-specific inhibitor restores MDSC mediated immunosuppression by rescuing Arg-1 expression after STAT3 inhibition.153 Downregulation of phospho-STAT3 levels in liver cancer significantly suppresses MDSC numbers and tumor burden. In addition, this process also promoted Bax-dependent apoptosis in MDSCs by upregulating pro-apoptotic genes, including Bax and cleaved caspase-3, while downregulating the anti-apoptotic factor, Bcl-2.154 Stimulator of interferon genes (STING) is a major sensor in host defense signaling that is considered to be a vital protein in the regulation of anti-tumor immunity and MDSC differentiation.155 A combination of STAT3 inhibitor and a STING agonist suppresses tumor growth, partly by reducing tumor microenvironment MDSC levels.156 The systemic administration of AZD9150, an antisense oligonucleotide STAT3 inhibitor, reduces G-MDSC peripheral levels in patients.157,158 AZD9150 has been trialed in combination with anti-PD-1 against advanced solid tumors and relapsed metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (NCT02499328).

Inhibition of ECM Remodeling in Distant Organs After Surgery

LOX is a secreted copper-dependent amine oxidase that cross-links collagens and elastin in the ECM. It induces postoperative ECM remodeling in the lungs. Its expression is induced by hypoxic conditions, including surgical wounding. Postsurgical inhibitors of LOX upregulation inhibit MDSCs infiltration and postoperative metastasis. However, in the absence of a crystal structure, it is extremely difficult to design selective inhibitors.159 Recently, Leung et al. developed an orally bioavailable LOX inhibitor (CCT365623) with good anti-LOX potency, selectivity, pharmacokinetic properties, and anti-metastasis effects.160 β-aminopropionitrile (an organic compound with amine and nitrile functional groups), is an irreversible LOX inhibitor. BPAN suppresses LOX effects in vivo and in vitro.161 In addition, LOX expression is correlated with elevated VEGF and platelet-derived growth factor expression, and both were downregulated by β-aminopropionitrile in vivo.162 CCT365623, another LOX inhibitor, disrupts EGFR cell surface retention and slows in vivo primary and metastatic tumor progression.163 Even though these LOX inhibitors have not been introduced in clinical trials for cancer therapy, they are promising therapeutic options for premetastatic niche disruption after surgery.

Repair of Lung Vascular Permeability After Surgery

Inflammatory cytokines promote vascular permeability in lungs, enhancing MDSCs and cancer cell infiltration. Cytokines secreted by infiltrating MDSCs promote further pulmonary vascular leakage. This effects may be inhibited by anti-inflammatory drugs, anti-proinflammatory cytokine antibodies (e.g., anti-IL-6) or the C5a inhibitor. By upregulating angiopoietin 2 and suppressing angiopoietin 1, IL-6 generates a serum profile that promotes vascular leakage.164 Tocilizumab is an IL-6 inhibitor used to treat the cytokine storm that is triggered by some immunotherapies, and may be effective in suppressing inflammatory responses. C5aR is upregulated in bronchial and alveolar epithelial cells, greatly contributing to lung inflammation and injury.165 Ravulizumab (ALXN1210) is a novel C5 inhibitor that potently inhibits C5 when administered on an extended 8-week dosing interval. A phase III, open-label, randomized, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous Ravulizumab administration relative to the best supportive care given to severe covid-19 cases, acute lung injuries, or acute respiratory distress syndrome (NCT04369469) is underway. Although these drugs have not been trialed perioperatively, they are promising agents for the repair of vascular permeability after surgery, thereby inhibiting MDSC and cancer cell infiltration.

Inhibition of MDSC-Mediated Immunosuppression

Preclinical studies have shown that the immunosuppressive function of MDSCs is enhanced by surgery. Therefore, anti-MDSC-mediated immunosuppression may disrupt premetastatic niche development after surgery. TGF-β is a vital cytokine for establishing an immunosuppressive pre-metastatic environment by MDSCs. Autocrine and paracrine TGF-β effects on MDSCs survival and lineage commitment suggest that pharmacologic TGF-β signaling inhibition might favor antitumor immunity.166 The phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE 5) inhibitors, sildenafil and tadalafil, have been reported to inhibit MDSCs mediated immunosuppression.167169 Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), aimed at rapidly restoring immunity after surgery and reducing surgical stress, has been found to benefit patients undergoing extensive solid cancer surgeries. The ERAS pathway has been associated with effective postoperative analgesia, major reductions in in-hospital opioids consumption, and reduced pain, relative to conventional management practices.170 Moreover, preoperative multimodal exercise and nutritional programs (prehabilitation) are associated with improved 5-year disease free survival in stage III colorectal cancer after surgical resection.171 In colorectal cancer patients, application of the ERAS protocol is associated with low inflammatory metrics on postoperative day 1, and improved 5-year survival after surgery.172

Conclusions and Perspectives

The roles of MDSCs in cancer progression have been well elucidated. However, more attention should be paid to the period immediately after surgery. During this period, the complex interplay between immune responses and dysfunction determines the long-term survival. The 2 weeks of MDSC persistence in lungs after surgery produces a premetastatic niche that makes the lungs more vulnerable to colonization by circulating cancer cells. More studies are needed to identify the phenotypes and function of postsurgical MDSCs given that they may be influenced by multiple factors that respond to surgical stress. Surgical stress initiates an inflammatory response that promotes MDSCs development and mobilization. In addition, surgical trauma releases DAMPs into circulation, which trigger local defense responses upon arrival at distant organs, including lungs. Local inflammatory responses to DAMPs lead to chemokine release, which attract MDSCs. DAMPs also directly activate MDSCs through the NF-κB and STAT3 signaling pathways. ECM remodeling and enhanced vascular permeability induced by surgery promote MDSC settlement, which enhances the development of a premetastatic microenvironment. Anti-postoperative MDSC infiltration therapies disrupt the premetastatic niche and improve long-term survival outcomes after tumor resection. Most potential therapies are currently in the preclinical evaluation phases. Suppression of surgical stress effects using COX-2 inhibitors or β-blockade have shown favorable effects in preclinical studies. Anti-DAMPs and associated inflammatory signals, such as NF-κB, IL-1β, and NLRP3 inflammasome, are rational therapies. Chemokine receptor inhibitors, in combination with low-dose epigenetic drugs have been shown to disrupt premetastatic niche formation, thereby improving long-term survival outcomes in mice. Inhibition of postoperative ECM remodeling and vascular leakage repair also could be beneficial during the perioperative period. Moreover, anti-MDSC therapies in tumor-bearing conditions, including low-dose chemotherapy, TKIs, and ATRA are promising therapeutic options in the perioperative period. However, the dosage and timing of these drugs, as well as the immunosuppressive status and associated complications, should be carefully considered. Finally, reversing the postoperative immunosuppressive state using TGF-β inhibitors or the ERAS protocol has the potential to improve the long-term survival outcomes of patients after tumor resection.

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by the National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for “Significant New Drugs Development” (No. 2018ZX09733001, China), the Excellent Youth Foundation of Sichuan Scientific Committee Grant in China (No. 2019JDJQ008), the Special Program (No. 2020T130447) of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, and by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82002847).

Disclosure

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Chongqi Tu, Email: tcq_orthoncologist@163.com.

Xiawei Wei, Email: xiaweiwei@scu.edu.en.

References

  • 1.Tsilimigras DI, Bagante F, Moris D, et al. Recurrence patterns and outcomes after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma within and beyond the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Criteria. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:1–11. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08452-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang XF, Xue F, Dong DH, et al. Number and station of lymph node metastasis after curative-intent resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma impact prognosis. Ann Surg. 2020. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003788. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Matzner P, Sandbank E, Neeman E, Zmora O, Gottumukkala V, Ben-Eliyahu S. Harnessing cancer immunotherapy during the unexploited immediate perioperative period. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17:1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0319-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hiller JG, Perry NJ, Poulogiannis G, Riedel B, Sloan EK. Perioperative events influence cancer recurrence risk after surgery. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(4):205–218. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lu Z, Zou J, Li S, et al. Epigenetic therapy inhibits metastases by disrupting premetastatic niches. Nature. 2020;579(7798):284–290. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2054-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Horowitz M, Neeman E, Sharon E, Ben-Eliyahu S. Exploiting the critical perioperative period to improve long-term cancer outcomes. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015;12(4):213–226. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bronte V, Brandau S, Chen SH, et al. Recommendations for myeloid-derived suppressor cell nomenclature and characterization standards. Nat Comm. 2016;7:12150. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bergenfelz C, Leandersson K. The generation and identity of human myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Front Oncol. 2020;10:109. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Khan ANH, Emmons TR, Wong JT, et al. Quantification of early-stage myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer requires excluding basophils. Cancer Immunol Res. 2020;8:19. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-19-0556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ren W, Zhang X, Li W, et al. Circulating and tumor-infiltrating arginase 1-expressing cells in gastric adenocarcinoma patients were mainly immature and monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):8056. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64841-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Angka L, Martel AB, Kilgour M, et al. Natural Killer Cell IFNγ Secretion is Profoundly Suppressed Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(12):3747–3754. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6691-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Niavarani SR, Lawson C, Bakos O, et al. Lipid accumulation impairs natural killer cell cytotoxicity and tumor control in the postoperative period. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):823. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6045-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liu Y, Cao X. Characteristics and significance of the pre-metastatic niche. Cancer Cell. 2016;30(5):668–681. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Costa-Silva B, Aiello NM, Ocean AJ, et al. Pancreatic cancer exosomes initiate pre-metastatic niche formation in the liver. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17(6):816–826. doi: 10.1038/ncb3169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu Y, Gu Y, Han Y, et al. Tumor exosomal RNAs promote lung pre-metastatic niche formation by activating alveolar epithelial TLR3 to recruit neutrophils. Cancer Cell. 2016;30(2):243–256. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang Y, Ding Y, Guo N, Wang S. MDSCs: key criminals of tumor pre-metastatic niche formation. Front Immunol. 2019;10:172. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dai J, El Gazzar M, Li GY, Moorman JP, Yao ZQ. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: paradoxical roles in infection and immunity. J Innate Immunity. 2015;7(2):116–126. doi: 10.1159/000368233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huang B, Pan PY, Li Q, et al. Gr-1+ CD115+ immature myeloid suppressor cells mediate the development of tumor-induced T regulatory cells and T-cell anergy in tumor-bearing host. Cancer Res. 2006;66(2):1123–1131. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang J, Han X, Shi H, et al. Lung resided monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells contribute to premetastatic niche formation by enhancing MMP-9 expression. Molecul Cell Probes. 2020;50:101498. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2019.101498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yamauchi Y, Safi S, Blattner C, et al. Circulating and tumor myeloid-derived suppressor cells in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Am J Respiratory Crit Care Med. 2018;198(6):777–787. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201708-1707OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gao XH, Tian L, Wu J, et al. Circulating CD14(+) HLA-DR(-/low) myeloid-derived suppressor cells predicted early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgery. Hepatol Res. 2017;47(10):1061–1071. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee W-C, Wang Y-C, Cheng C-H, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the patients with liver resection for hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):2269. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38785-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bosiljcic M, Cederberg RA, Hamilton MJ, et al. Targeting myeloid-derived suppressor cells in combination with primary mammary tumor resection reduces metastatic growth in the lungs. Breast Cancer Res. 2019;21(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1189-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tai LH, de Souza CT, Bélanger S, et al. Preventing postoperative metastatic disease by inhibiting surgery-induced dysfunction in natural killer cells. Cancer Res. 2013;73(1):97–107. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang J, Su X, Yang L, et al. The influence of myeloid-derived suppressor cells on angiogenesis and tumor growth after cancer surgery. Int J Cancer. 2016;138(11):2688–2699. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang J, Yang L, Yu L, et al. Surgery-induced monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells expand regulatory T cells in lung cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(10):17050–17058. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hamilton-Reeves JM, Bechtel MD, Hand LK, et al. Effects of immunonutrition for cystectomy on immune response and infection rates: a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):389–392. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Urakawa S, Yamasaki M, Goto K, et al. Peri-operative monocyte count is a marker of poor prognosis in gastric cancer: increased monocytes are a characteristic of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother CII. 2019;68(8):1341–1350. doi: 10.1007/s00262-019-02366-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Brusa D, Simone M, Gontero P, et al. Circulating immunosuppressive cells of prostate cancer patients before and after radical prostatectomy: profile comparison. Int J Urol. 2013;20(10):971–978. doi: 10.1111/iju.12086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mundy-Bosse BL, Thornton LM, Yang HC, Andersen BL, Carson WE. Psychological stress is associated with altered levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in breast cancer patients. Cell Immunol. 2011;270(1):80–87. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2011.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Xu J, Peng Y, Yang M, et al. Increased levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in esophageal cancer patients is associated with the complication of sepsis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;125:109864. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.109864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gaudilliere B, Fragiadakis G, Tingle M, et al. Systems immunology reveals massive expansion of myeloid derived suppressor cells in patients undergoing surgery.
  • 33.Hübner M, Tomasi R, Effinger D, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells mediate immunosuppression after cardiopulmonary bypass. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(8):e700–e709. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ma X, Wang M, Yin T, Zhao Y, Wei X. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells promote metastasis in breast cancer after the stress of operative removal of the primary cancer. Front Oncol. 2019;9:855. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bennett S, Tai L, Alkayyal A, et al. Surgery-induced expansion of myeloid derived suppressor cells leads to natural killer cell dysfunction and postoperative metastases. 2014.
  • 36.Ananth AA, Tai LH, Lansdell C, et al. Surgical stress abrogates pre-existing protective t cell mediated anti-tumor immunity leading to postoperative cancer recurrence. PloS One. 2016;11(5):e0155947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Su X, Fan Y, Yang L, et al. Dexmedetomidine expands monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells and promotes tumour metastasis after lung cancer surgery. J Translational Med. 2018;16(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1727-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mohammadpour H, MacDonald CR, Qiao G, et al. β2 adrenergic receptor-mediated signaling regulates the immunosuppressive potential of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J Clin Investig. 2019;129(12):5537–5552. doi: 10.1172/JCI129502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang K, Bai X, Li R, et al. Endogenous glucocorticoids promote the expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in a murine model of trauma. International journal of molecular medicine. 2012;30(2):277–282. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2012.1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tomić S, Joksimović B, Bekić M, et al. Prostaglanin-E2 Potentiates the Suppressive Functions of Human Mononuclear Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells and Increases Their Capacity to Expand IL-10-Producing Regulatory T Cell Subsets. Front Immunol. 2019;10:475. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lu Y, Liu H, Bi Y, et al. Glucocorticoid receptor promotes the function of myeloid-derived suppressor cells by suppressing HIF1α-dependent glycolysis. Cellular & molecular immunology. 2018;15(6):618–629. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2017.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sinha P, Okoro C, Foell D, Freeze HH, Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Srikrishna G. Proinflammatory S100 proteins regulate the accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J Immunol. 2008;181(7):4666–4675. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.7.4666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hiratsuka S, Watanabe A, Sakurai Y, et al. The S100A8-serum amyloid A3-TLR4 paracrine cascade establishes a pre-metastatic phase. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10(11):1349–1355. doi: 10.1038/ncb1794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ruan X, Darwiche SS, Cai C, Scott MJ, Pape HC, Billiar TR. Anti-HMGB1 monoclonal antibody ameliorates immunosuppression after peripheral tissue trauma: attenuated T-lymphocyte response and increased splenic CD11b (+) Gr-1 (+) myeloid-derived suppressor cells require HMGB1. Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015:458626. doi: 10.1155/2015/458626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Li W, Wu K, Zhao E, et al. HMGB1 recruits myeloid derived suppressor cells to promote peritoneal dissemination of colon cancer after resection. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;436(2):156–161. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.04.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lin TJ, Lin HT, Chang WT, et al. Shikonin-enhanced cell immunogenicity of tumor vaccine is mediated by the differential effects of DAMP components. Molecular Cancer. 2015;14:174. doi: 10.1186/s12943-015-0435-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Koehn BH, Saha A, McDonald-Hyman C, et al. Danger-associated extracellular ATP counters MDSC therapeutic efficacy in acute GVHD. Blood. 2019;134(19):1670–1682. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019001950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nabizadeh JA, Manthey HD, Panagides N, et al. C5a receptors C5aR1 and C5aR2 mediate opposing pathologies in a mouse model of melanoma. FASEB J. 2019;33(10):11060–11071. doi: 10.1096/fj.201800980RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tannenbaum CS, Rayman PA, Pavicic PG, et al. Mediators of Inflammation-Driven Expansion, Trafficking, and Function of Tumor-Infiltrating MDSCs. Cancer Immunol Res. 2019;7(10):1687–1699. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cheng R, Billet S, Liu C, et al. Periodontal inflammation recruits distant metastatic breast cancer cells by increasing myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Oncogene. 2020;39(7):1543–1556. doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-1084-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Parker KH, Horn LA, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. High-mobility group box protein 1 promotes the survival of myeloid-derived suppressor cells by inducing autophagy. J Leukocyte Biol. 2016;100(3):463–470. doi: 10.1189/jlb.3HI0715-305R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ghouse SM, Vadrevu SK, Manne S, et al. Therapeutic Targeting of Vasculature in the Premetastatic and Metastatic Niches Reduces Lung Metastasis. J Immunol. 2020;204:990–1000. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1901208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tobin RP, Jordan KR, Kapoor P, et al. IL-6 and IL-8 Are Linked With Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Accumulation and Correlate With Poor Clinical Outcomes in Melanoma Patients. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1223. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jing B, Wang T, Sun B, et al. IL6/STAT3 Signaling Orchestrates Premetastatic Niche Formation and Immunosuppressive Traits in Lung. Cancer Res. 2020;80(4):784–797. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Apple CG, Miller ES, Loftus TJ, et al. Impact of Injury Severity on the Inflammatory State and Severe Anemia. J Surg Res. 2020;248:109–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Alfaro C, Teijeira A, Oñate C, et al. Tumor-Produced Interleukin-8 Attracts Human Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells and Elicits Extrusion of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(15):3924–3936. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Jia R, Zhou M, Tuttle CSL, Maier AB. Immune capacity determines outcome following surgery or trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Trauma Emergency Surg. 2019;68:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01271-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sai B, Dai Y, Fan S, et al. Cancer-educated mesenchymal stem cells promote the survival of cancer cells at primary and distant metastatic sites via the expansion of bone marrow-derived-PMN-MDSCs. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(12):941. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-2149-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yan M, Hu Y, Yao M, Bao S, Fang Y. GM-CSF ameliorates microvascular barrier integrity via pericyte-derived Ang-1 in wound healing. Wound Repair Regeneration. 2017;25(6):933–943. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yan JJ, Ryu JH, Piao H, et al. Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Attenuates Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury by Inducing Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells. J Am Soc Nephrol JASN. 2020;31(4):731–746. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019060601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wiewiora M, Mertas A, Gluck M, Nowowiejska-Wiewiora A, Czuba Z, Piecuch J. Effect of weight loss surgery on biomarkers of angiogenesis in obese patients. Obes Surg. 2020;30(9):3417–3425. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04580-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wang D, Sun H, Wei J, Cen B, DuBois RN. CXCL1 Is Critical for Premetastatic Niche Formation and Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Res. 2017;77(13):3655–3665. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-3199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Flores-Toro JA, Luo D, Gopinath A, et al. CCR2 inhibition reduces tumor myeloid cells and unmasks a checkpoint inhibitor effect to slow progression of resistant murine gliomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(2):1129–1138. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910856117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Yang Y, Zhai C, Chang Y, et al. High expression of chemokine CCL2 is associated with recurrence after surgery in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol Sem Original Investig. 2016;34(5):238–239. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.11.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Takahashi R, Amano H, Ito Y, et al. Microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 promotes lung metastasis via SDF-1/CXCR4-mediated recruitment of CD11b(+)Gr1(+)MDSCs from bone marrow. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;121:109581. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Tohme S, Simmons RL, Tsung A. Surgery for Cancer: a Trigger for Metastases. Cancer research. 2017;77(7):1548–1552. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Jeon HH, Yu Q, Lu Y, et al. FOXO1 regulates VEGFA expression and promotes angiogenesis in healing wounds. J Pathol. 2018;245(3):258–264. doi: 10.1002/path.5075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Yang F, Li Y, Zou W, et al. Adoptive transfer of IFN-γ-induced M-MDSCs promotes immune tolerance to allografts through iNOS pathway. Inflamm Res. 2019;68(7):545–555. doi: 10.1007/s00011-019-01237-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hua Y, Bergers G. Tumors vs chronic wounds: an immune cell’s perspective. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2178. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Zhao X, Rong L, Zhao X, et al. TNF signaling drives myeloid-derived suppressor cell accumulation. J Clin Investig. 2012;122(11):4094–4104. doi: 10.1172/JCI64115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Regan MC, Kirk SJ, Hurson M, Sodeyama M, Wasserkrug HL, Barbul A. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibits in vivo collagen synthesis. Surgery. 1993;113(2):173–177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Yamakawa S, Hayashida K. Advances in surgical applications of growth factors for wound healing. Burns Trauma. 2019;7(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41038-019-0148-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Shao L, Zhang B, Wang L, Wu L, Kan Q, Fan K. MMP-9-cleaved osteopontin isoform mediates tumor immune escape by inducing expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 2017;493(4):1478–1484. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Helmersson-Karlqvist J, Åkerfeldt T, Gunningberg L, Swenne CL, Larsson A. Serum MMP-9 and TIMP-1 concentrations and MMP-9 activity during surgery-induced inflammation in humans. Clin Chem Laboratory Med. 2012;50(6):1115–1119. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2011-0234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Rachman-Tzemah C, Zaffryar-Eilot S, Grossman M, et al. Blocking Surgically Induced Lysyl Oxidase Activity Reduces the Risk of Lung Metastases. Cell Rep. 2017;19(4):774–784. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Harlow CR, Wu X, van Deemter M, et al. Targeting lysyl oxidase reduces peritoneal fibrosis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(8):e0183013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Eisenblaetter M, Flores-Borja F, Lee JJ, et al. Visualization of Tumor-Immune Interaction - Target-Specific Imaging of S100A8/A9 Reveals Pre-Metastatic Niche Establishment. Theranostics. 2017;7(9):2392–2401. doi: 10.7150/thno.17138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Vrakas CN, O’Sullivan RM, Evans SE, et al. The Measure of DAMPs and a role for S100A8 in recruiting suppressor cells in breast cancer lung metastasis. Immunological investigations. 2015;44(2):174–188. doi: 10.3109/08820139.2014.952818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Fei D, Meng X, Yu W, et al. Fibronectin (FN) cooperated with TLR2/TLR4 receptor to promote innate immune responses of macrophages via binding to integrin β1. Virulence. 2018;9(1):1588–1600. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2018.1528841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Rani M, Nicholson SE, Zhang Q, Schwacha MG. Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) released after burn are associated with inflammation and monocyte activation. Burns. 2017;43(2):297–303. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Yan G, Zhao H, Zhang Q, et al. A RIPK3-PGE(2) Circuit Mediates Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell-Potentiated Colorectal Carcinogenesis. Cancer Research. 2018;78(19):5586–5599. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-3962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Fischer A, Ben-Eliyahu S. Perioperative Stress, Inflammation, and Cancer Progression: opportunities for Intervention in Breast and Colorectal Cancer Surgery UtilizingBeta-Adrenergic Blockade and COX-2 Inhibition. Current Anesthesiology Reports. 2018;8(4):386–392. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ridiandries A, Tan JTM, Bursill CA. The Role of Chemokines in Wound Healing. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(10):3217. doi: 10.3390/ijms19103217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Jawa RS, Anillo S, Huntoon K, Baumann H, Kulaylat M. Interleukin-6 in surgery, trauma, and critical care part II: clinical implications. J Intensive Care Med. 2011;26(2):73–87. doi: 10.1177/0885066610384188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Nikolakopoulou Z, Hector LR, Creagh-Brown BC, Evans TW, Quinlan GJ, Burke-Gaffney A. Plasma S100A8/A9 heterodimer is an early prognostic marker of acute kidney injury associated with cardiac surgery. Biomarkers Med. 2019;13(3):205–218. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2018-0238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Krall JA, Reinhardt F, Mercury OA, et al. The systemic response to surgery triggers the outgrowth of distant immune-controlled tumors in mouse models of dormancy. Sci Translational Med. 2018;10(436):3464. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan3464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Jimenez RV, Kuznetsova V, Connelly AN, Hel Z, Szalai AJ. C-Reactive Protein Promotes the Expansion of Myeloid Derived Cells With Suppressor Functions. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2183. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Huang Y, Chen X, Dikov MM, et al. Distinct roles of VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 in the aberrant hematopoiesis associated with elevated levels of VEGF. Blood. 2007;110(2):624–631. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-01-065714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Sinha P, Clements VK, Fulton AM, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Prostaglandin E2 promotes tumor progression by inducing myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67(9):4507–4513. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Zhang Y, Liu Q, Zhang M, Yu Y, Liu X, Cao X. Fas signal promotes lung cancer growth by recruiting myeloid-derived suppressor cells via cancer cell-derived PGE2. J Immunol. 2009;182(6):3801–3808. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0801548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Porta C, Consonni FM, Morlacchi S, et al. Tumor-derived prostaglandin E2 promotes p50 NF-κB-dependent differentiation of monocytic MDSC. Cancer Res. 2020;80(13):2874. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-2843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Li BH, Garstka MA, Li ZF. Chemokines and their receptors promoting the recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells into the tumor. Molecular Immunol. 2020;117:201–215. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2019.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Xu P, He H, Gu Y, et al. Surgical trauma contributes to progression of colon cancer by downregulating CXCL4 and recruiting MDSCs. Experimental Cell Res. 2018;370(2):692–698. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.07.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Teijeira Á, Garasa S, Gato M, et al. CXCR1 and CXCR2 chemokine receptor agonists produced by tumors induce neutrophil extracellular traps that interfere with immune cytotoxicity. Immunity. 2020;52:856. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Carson WFT, Salter-Green SE, Scola MM, Joshi A, Gallagher KA, Kunkel SL. Enhancement of macrophage inflammatory responses by CCL2 is correlated with increased miR-9 expression and downregulation of the ERK1/2 phosphatase Dusp6. Cell Immunol. 2017;314:63–72. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2017.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Barker HE, Cox TR, Erler JT. The rationale for targeting the LOX family in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(8):540–552. doi: 10.1038/nrc3319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Erler JT, Bennewith KL, Cox TR, et al. Hypoxia-induced lysyl oxidase is a critical mediator of bone marrow cell recruitment to form the premetastatic niche. Cancer Cell. 2009;15(1):35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Eutamene H, Theodorou V, Schmidlin F, et al. LPS-induced lung inflammation is linked to increased epithelial permeability: role of MLCK. Eur Respiratory J. 2005;25(5):789–796. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Rieder SA, Nagarkatti P, Nagarkatti M. Multiple anti-inflammatory pathways triggered by resveratrol lead to amelioration of staphylococcal enterotoxin B-induced lung injury. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;167(6):1244–1258. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02063.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Hopfner KP, Hornung V. Molecular mechanisms and cellular functions of cGAS-STING signalling. Nat Rev Molecular Cell Biol. 2020;21(9):501–521. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0244-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Dey A, Varelas X, Guan KL. Targeting the Hippo pathway in cancer, fibrosis, wound healing and regenerative medicine. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2020;19(7):480–494. doi: 10.1038/s41573-020-0070-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Huang LS, Hong Z, Wu W, et al. mtDNA Activates cGAS Signaling and Suppresses the YAP-Mediated Endothelial Cell Proliferation Program to Promote Inflammatory Injury. Immunity. 2020;52(3):475–86.e475. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Gurkan OU, He C, Zielinski R, et al. Interleukin-6 mediates pulmonary vascular permeability in a two-hit model of ventilator-associated lung injury. Experimental Lung Res. 2011;37(10):575–584. doi: 10.3109/01902148.2011.620680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Ma S, Song W, Xu Y, et al. Neutralizing tumor-promoting inflammation with polypeptide-dexamethasone conjugate for microenvironment modulation and colorectal cancer therapy. Biomaterials. 2020;232:119676. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Wang H, Ricklin D, Lambris JD. Complement-activation fragment C4a mediates effector functions by binding as untethered agonist to protease-activated receptors 1 and 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(41):10948–10953. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707364114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Heuertz RM, Piquette CA, Webster RO. Rabbits with elevated serum C-reactive protein exhibit diminished neutrophil infiltration and vascular permeability in C5a-induced alveolitis. Am J Pathol. 1993;142(1):319–328. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.He B, Johansson-Percival A, Backhouse J, et al. Remodeling of Metastatic Vasculature Reduces Lung Colonization and Sensitizes Overt Metastases to Immunotherapy. Cell Rep. 2020;30(3):714–24.e715. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Li Y, Jiang W, Li ZZ, et al. Repetitive restraint stress changes spleen immune cell subsets through glucocorticoid receptor or β-adrenergic receptor in a stage dependent manner. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 2018;495(1):1108–1114. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.11.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Xia Y, Wei Y, Li ZY, et al. Catecholamines contribute to the neovascularization of lung cancer via tumor-associated macrophages. Brain Behavior Immunity. 2019;81:111–121. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Zhou L, Li Y, Li X, et al. Propranolol Attenuates Surgical Stress-Induced Elevation of the Regulatory T Cell Response in Patients Undergoing Radical Mastectomy. J Immunol. 2016;196(8):3460–3469. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Obermajer N, Muthuswamy R, Lesnock J, Edwards RP, Kalinski P. Positive feedback between PGE2 and COX2 redirects the differentiation of human dendritic cells toward stable myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Blood. 2011;118(20):5498–5505. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-365825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Li RJ, Liu L, Gao W, Song XZ, Bai XJ, Li ZF. Cyclooxygenase-2 blockade inhibits accumulation and function of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and restores T cell response after traumatic stress. J Huazhong University Sci Technol. 2014;34(2):234–240. doi: 10.1007/s11596-014-1264-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Obermajer N, Muthuswamy R, Odunsi K, Edwards RP, Kalinski P. PGE(2)-induced CXCL12 production and CXCR4 expression controls the accumulation of human MDSCs in ovarian cancer environment. Cancer Res. 2011;71(24):7463–7470. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Veltman JD, Lambers ME, van Nimwegen M, et al. COX-2 inhibition improves immunotherapy and is associated with decreased numbers of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in mesothelioma. Celecoxib influences MDSC function. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:464. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Fujita M, Kohanbash G, Fellows-Mayle W, et al. COX-2 blockade suppresses gliomagenesis by inhibiting myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Res. 2011;71(7):2664–2674. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Benish M, Bartal I, Goldfarb Y, et al. Perioperative use of beta-blockers and COX-2 inhibitors may improve immune competence and reduce the risk of tumor metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(7):2042–2052. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9890-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Haldar R, Shaashua L, Lavon H, et al. Perioperative inhibition of β-adrenergic and COX2 signaling in a clinical trial in breast cancer patients improves tumor Ki-67 expression, serum cytokine levels, and PBMCs transcriptome. Brain Behavior Immunity. 2018;73:294–309. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2018.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Shaashua L, Shabat-Simon M, Haldar R, et al. Perioperative COX-2 and β-Adrenergic Blockade Improves Metastatic Biomarkers in Breast Cancer Patients in a Phase-II Randomized Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(16):4651–4661. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Kinoshita R, Sato H, Yamauchi A, et al. Newly developed anti-S100A8/A9 monoclonal antibody efficiently prevents lung tropic cancer metastasis. Int J Cancer. 2019;145(2):569–575. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Elkabets M, Ribeiro VSG, Dinarello CA, et al. IL-1β regulates a novel myeloid-derived suppressor cell subset that impairs NK cell development and function. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40(12):3347–3357. doi: 10.1002/eji.201041037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Theivanthiran B, Evans KS, DeVito NC, et al. A tumor-intrinsic PD-L1/NLRP3 inflammasome signaling pathway drives resistance to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. J Clin Investig. 2020;130(5):2570. doi: 10.1172/JCI133055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Yang Y, Wang H, Kouadir M, Song H, Shi F. Recent advances in the mechanisms of NLRP3 inflammasome activation and its inhibitors. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(2):128. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1413-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Huang M, Wu R, Chen L, et al. S100A9 Regulates MDSCs-Mediated Immune Suppression via the RAGE and TLR4 Signaling Pathways in Colorectal Carcinoma. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2243. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Cheng Y, Ma XL, Wei YQ, Wei XW. Potential roles and targeted therapy of the CXCLs/CXCR2 axis in cancer and inflammatory diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2019;1871(2):289–312. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2019.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Gürlevik E, Fleischmann-Mundt B, Brooks J, et al. Administration of Gemcitabine After Pancreatic Tumor Resection in Mice Induces an Antitumor Immune Response Mediated by Natural Killer Cells. Gastroenterology. 2016;151(2):338–350.e337. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Otsubo D, Yamashita K, Fujita M, et al. Early-phase Treatment by Low-dose 5-Fluorouracil or Primary Tumor Resection Inhibits MDSC-mediated Lung Metastasis Formation. Anticancer Res. 2015;35(8):4425–4431. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Vincent J, Mignot G, Chalmin F, et al. 5-Fluorouracil Selectively Kills Tumor-Associated Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Resulting in Enhanced T Cell-Dependent Antitumor Immunity. Cancer Res. 2010;70(8):3052–3061. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Peereboom DM, Alban TJ, Grabowski MM, et al. Metronomic capecitabine as an immune modulator in glioblastoma patients reduces myeloid-derived suppressor cells. JCI Insight. 2019;4(22):e130748. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.130748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Yang J, Yan J, Liu B. Targeting VEGF/VEGFR to Modulate Antitumor Immunity. Front Immunol. 2018;9:978. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Pal SK, Vuong W, Zhang W, et al. Clinical and Translational Assessment of VEGFR1 as a Mediator of the Premetastatic Niche in High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. 2015;14(12):2896–2900. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Maughan BL, Pal SK, Gill D, et al. Modulation of Premetastatic Niche by the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Pazopanib in Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer Followed by Radical Prostatectomy: a Phase II Randomized Trial. Oncologist. 2018;23(12):1413–1551. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Li J, Srivastava RM, Ettyreddy A, Ferris RL. Cetuximab ameliorates suppressive phenotypes of myeloid antigen presenting cells in head and neck cancer patients. J Immunother Cancer. 2015;3:54. doi: 10.1186/s40425-015-0097-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Holtzhausen A, Harris W, Ubil E, et al. TAM Family Receptor Kinase Inhibition Reverses MDSC-Mediated Suppression and Augments Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Melanoma. Cancer Immunol Res. 2019;7(10):1672–1686. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-19-0008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Varikuti S, Singh B, Volpedo G, et al. Ibrutinib treatment inhibits breast cancer progression and metastasis by inducing conversion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells to dendritic cells. Br J Cancer. 2020;122(7):1005–1013. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0743-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Jelveh Moghaddam H, Aghajani M, Raeis-Abdollahi E, Faghihi M, Dabbagh A, Imani A. Decrease in VEGF-Induced Pericardial Adhesion Formation Using Bevacizumab After Surgery. Surg Innovation. 2019;26(1):21–26. doi: 10.1177/1553350618813451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Najjar YG, Rayman P, Jia X, et al. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Subset Accumulation in Renal Cell Carcinoma Parenchyma Is Associated with Intratumoral Expression of IL1β, IL8, CXCL5, and Mip-1α. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(9):2346–2355. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Greene S, Robbins Y, Mydlarz WK, et al. Inhibition of MDSC Trafficking with SX-682, a CXCR1/2 Inhibitor, Enhances NK-Cell Immunotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer Models. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(6):1420–1431. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Sun L, Clavijo PE, Robbins Y, et al. Inhibiting myeloid-derived suppressor cell trafficking enhances T cell immunotherapy. JCI Insight. 2019;4(7):e126853. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.126853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Nicholls DJ, Wiley K, Dainty I, et al. Pharmacological characterization of AZD5069, a slowly reversible CXC chemokine receptor 2 antagonist. J Pharmacol Exp Therapeutics. 2015;353(2):340–350. doi: 10.1124/jpet.114.221358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Nywening TM, Wang-Gillam A, Sanford DE, et al. Targeting tumour-associated macrophages with CCR2 inhibition in combination with FOLFIRINOX in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-centre, open-label, dose-finding, non-randomised, phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(5):651–662. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00078-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Masuda T, Noda M, Kogawa T, et al. Phase I dose-escalation trial to repurpose propagermanium, an oral CCL2 inhibitor, in patients with breast cancer. Cancer Sci. 2020;111(3):924–931. doi: 10.1111/cas.14306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Mu XY, Wang RJ, Yao ZX, et al. RS 504393 inhibits M-MDSCs recruiting in immune microenvironment of bladder cancer after gemcitabine treatment. Molecular Immunol. 2019;109:140–148. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2019.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Lirk P, Fiegl H, Weber NC, Hollmann MW. Epigenetics in the perioperative period. Br J Pharmacol. 2015;172(11):2748–2755. doi: 10.1111/bph.12865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Youn JI, Kumar V, Collazo M, et al. Epigenetic silencing of retinoblastoma gene regulates pathologic differentiation of myeloid cells in cancer. Nat Immunol. 2013;14(3):211–220. doi: 10.1038/ni.2526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Hollen MK, Stortz JA, Darden D, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cell function and epigenetic expression evolves over time after surgical sepsis. Crit Care (London, Engl). 2019;23(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2628-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Xie Z, Ikegami T, Ago Y, Okada N, Tachibana M. Valproic acid attenuates CCR2-dependent tumor infiltration of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells, limiting tumor progression. Oncoimmunology. 2020;9(1):1734268. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1734268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Nefedova Y, Fishman M, Sherman S, Wang X, Beg AA, Gabrilovich DI. Mechanism of all-trans retinoic acid effect on tumor-associated myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67(22):11021–11028. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Bauer R, Udonta F, Wroblewski M, et al. Blockade of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Expansion with All-Trans Retinoic Acid Increases the Efficacy of Antiangiogenic Therapy. Cancer Res. 2018;78(12):3220–3232. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-3415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Long AH, Highfill SL, Cui Y, et al. Reduction of MDSCs with All-trans Retinoic Acid Improves CAR Therapy Efficacy for Sarcomas. Cancer Immunol Res. 2016;4(10):869–880. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Mohan CD, Rangappa S, Preetham HD, et al. Targeting STAT3 signaling pathway in cancer by agents derived from Mother Nature. Sem Cancer Biol. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 151.Trovato R, Fiore A, Sartori S, et al. Immunosuppression by monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells in patients with pancreatic ductal carcinoma is orchestrated by STAT3. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0734-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Hellsten R, Lilljebjörn L, Johansson M, Leandersson K, Bjartell A. The STAT3 inhibitor galiellalactone inhibits the generation of MDSC-like monocytes by prostate cancer cells and decreases immunosuppressive and tumorigenic factors. Prostate. 2019;79(14):1611–1621. doi: 10.1002/pros.23885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Vasquez-Dunddel D, Pan F, Zeng Q, et al. STAT3 regulates arginase-I in myeloid-derived suppressor cells from cancer patients. J Clin Investigation. 2013;123(4):1580–1589. doi: 10.1172/JCI60083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Guha P, Gardell J, Darpolor J, et al. STAT3 inhibition induces Bax-dependent apoptosis in liver tumor myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Oncogene. 2019;38(4):533–548. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0449-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Zhang CX, Ye SB, Ni JJ, et al. STING signaling remodels the tumor microenvironment by antagonizing myeloid-derived suppressor cell expansion. Cell Death Differentiation. 2019;26(11):2314–2328. doi: 10.1038/s41418-019-0302-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Pei J, Zhang Y, Luo Q, et al. STAT3 inhibition enhances CDN-induced STING signaling and antitumor immunity. Cancer Lett. 2019;450:110–122. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.02.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Reilley MJ, McCoon P, Cook C, et al. STAT3 antisense oligonucleotide AZD9150 in a subset of patients with heavily pretreated lymphoma: results of a phase 1b trial. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0436-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Odate S, Veschi V, Yan S, Lam N, Woessner R, Thiele CJ. Inhibition of STAT3 with the Generation 2.5 Antisense Oligonucleotide, AZD9150, Decreases Neuroblastoma Tumorigenicity and Increases Chemosensitivity. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(7):1771–1784. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Johnston KA, Lopez KM. Lysyl oxidase in cancer inhibition and metastasis. Cancer Lett. 2018;417:174–181. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Leung L, Niculescu-Duvaz D, Smithen D, et al. Anti-metastatic inhibitors of Lysyl Oxidase (LOX): design and Structure-Activity Relationships. J Med Chem. 2019;62(12):5863–5884. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Li Q, Zhu CC, Ni B, et al. Lysyl oxidase promotes liver metastasis of gastric cancer via facilitating the reciprocal interactions between tumor cells and cancer associated fibroblasts. EBioMedicine. 2019;49:157–171. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.10.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Yang M, Liu J, Wang F, et al. Lysyl oxidase assists tumor-initiating cells to enhance angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2019;54(4):1398–1408. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2019.4705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Tang H, Leung L, Saturno G, et al. Lysyl oxidase drives tumour progression by trapping EGF receptors at the cell surface. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14909. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Klaschik S, Gehlen J, Neumann C, et al. Network of Mediators for Vascular Inflammation and Leakage Is Dysbalanced during Cytoreductive Surgery for Late-Stage Ovarian Cancer. Mediators Inflammation. 2019;2019:5263717. doi: 10.1155/2019/5263717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Sun L, Guo RF, Gao H, Sarma JV, Zetoune FS, Ward PA. Attenuation of IgG immune complex-induced acute lung injury by silencing C5aR in lung epithelial cells. FASEB J. 2009;23(11):3808–3818. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-133694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Gonzalez-Junca A, Driscoll KE, Pellicciotta I, et al. Autocrine TGFβ Is a Survival Factor for Monocytes and Drives Immunosuppressive Lineage Commitment. Cancer Immunol Res. 2019;7(2):306–320. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Tai LH, Alkayyal AA, Leslie AL, et al. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition reduces postoperative metastatic disease by targeting surgery-induced myeloid derived suppressor cell-dependent inhibition of Natural Killer cell cytotoxicity. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7(6):e1431082. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1431082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Hassel JC, Jiang H, Bender C, et al. Tadalafil has biologic activity in human melanoma Results of a pilot trial with Tadalafil in patients with metastatic Melanoma (TaMe) Oncoimmunology. 2017;6(9):e1326440. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1326440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Weed DT, Zilio S, Reis IM, et al. The Reversal of Immune Exclusion Mediated by Tadalafil and an Anti-tumor Vaccine Also Induces PDL1 Upregulation in Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: interim Analysis of a Phase I Clinical Trial. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1206. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Rice D, Rodriguez-Restrepo A, Mena G, et al. Matched pairs comparison of an enhanced recovery pathway versus conventional management on opioid exposure and pain control in patients undergoing lung surgery. Ann Surg. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 171.Trépanier M, Minnella EM, Paradis T, et al. Improved Disease-free Survival After Prehabilitation for Colorectal Cancer Surgery. Ann Surg. 2019;270(3):493–501. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Gustafsson UO, Oppelstrup H, Thorell A, Nygren J, Ljungqvist O. Adherence to the ERAS protocol is Associated with 5-Year Survival After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: a Retrospective Cohort Study. World J Surg. 2016;40(7):1741–1747. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3460-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Surgical Oncology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES