Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 30.
Published in final edited form as: Head Neck. 2019 Nov 30;42(4):608–624. doi: 10.1002/hed.26034

Long-term opioid use in curative-intent radiotherapy: One-Year outcomes in head/neck cancer patients

Leif-Erik D Schumacher 1, Zoukaa B Sargi 2, Melissa Masforroll 3, Deukwoo Kwon 4, Wei Zhao 4, Maria A Rueda-Lara 5, Laura M Freedman 6, Nagy Elsayyad 6, Stuart E Samuels 6, Matthew C Abramowitz 6, Michael A Samuels 6
PMCID: PMC7703799  NIHMSID: NIHMS1625526  PMID: 31785054

Abstract

Background:

No study has determined the incidence of long-term opioid use, or risk factors for long-term use, ≥1 year after radiotherapy.

Methods:

Medical records of 276 head/neck cancer patients were retrospectively assessed for persistent opioid use 1-year after curative-intent radiotherapy. Numerous potential risk factors were assessed and the physicians’ documented reasons for continued use were qualitatively categorized as suspected opioid use disorder (OUD) or as medically indicated for control of ongoing pain.

Results:

Of note, 20 of 276 patients continued using opioids long-term. High maximum opioid dose and the use of opioids and/or psychotropics/non-opioid analgesics at the radiation oncology intake visit were associated with this outcome. Three patients continued due to suspected OUD and 17 due to medical indications.

Conclusion:

Of note, 7.2% of patients developed long-term opioid use, which was associated with high maximum opioid dose and early initiation of opioids and/or psychotropics/non-opioid analgesics. Physicians cited medical indications as the primary reason for continued use.

Keywords: opioid, curative, cancer, long-term, abuse

1 |. INTRODUCTION

The opioid epidemic in the United States is a public health emergency.1 The incidence of opioid overdose is rising at an ever-increasing rate and some states have tightened regulations on opioid prescribing.2 In the past, prescribing for cancer patients was largely exempted from these new regulations. For example, in 2018, the Florida legislature limited prescribing of opioids to no more than 3 days.3 Cancer patients were exempted from this regulation. However, additional regulations on opioid prescribing (a requirement to provide information on opioid alternatives) were added in 2019 without any exemption for cancer patients.4 If tightening regulations on opioid prescribing continue to include cancer patients, the efforts of regulators to prevent opioid addiction may compromise patients’ control over cancer pain. Discussions about improving opioid regulation are necessary, but are limited by a paucity of data on long-term opioid use and addiction after cancer treatment to inform decision-making.

Head/neck cancer is of interest for this topic because disease, surgery, and especially radiation- or chemoradiation-induced oral mucositis cause patients to have the highest prevalence of pain of all cancer sites.5 Further, the demographics of patients with head/neck cancer are changing due to the increasing incidence of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer in younger and otherwise healthier patients.6 These patients have a high cure rate, making the issue of long-term opioid addiction even more relevant. Head/neck cancer patients may also be at high risk because they frequently require large doses of opioids to complete treatment without interruption.

Four studies have reported short-term rates of continued opioid use 6 months following curative-intent radiotherapy (7%−38%).710 Unfortunately, there are no studies in the literature with longer follow-up and the previous studies did not examine the reasons for continued opioid use. The cases of continued opioid use deserve detailed review to inform our understanding of which factors may lead to this outcome. In addition, further qualitative analysis may provide insight to the question: Does prescribing opioids to control pain in head/neck cancer patients undergoing curative radiotherapy carry a significant risk of causing long-term opioid dependence after the sources of pain have resolved?

2 |. PATIENTS (OR SUBJECTS) AND METHODS

2.1 |. Study design

This is a retrospective study conducted at a single institution. A full waiver of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) was approved by our Institutional Review Board to identify head/neck cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy between 2013 and mid-2017. A list of patients was obtained from the Tumor Registry. Patients were excluded if they had any of the following: (a) no radiotherapy at our institution, (b) no follow-up 1 year (±2 months) after completing radiotherapy, (c) continued active malignancy-related pain defined by: persistent disease, pain from a second primary or distant lesion within 18 months (rather than 12 months to account for any painful smoldering tumors with impending recurrence), or locoregional recurrence within 18 months, (d) chronic opioid use for non-cancer pain leading up to cancer symptoms or diagnosis, per the radiation oncology intake questionnaire, (e) no documentation of more than 1 day of opioid use.

2.2 |. Data collection

We reviewed available medical records for each eligible patient. We sought information specifically from documents related to the first radiation oncology consultation (intake), third week of radiotherapy, sixth week of radiotherapy, 6 weeks of follow-up after completing radiotherapy (±1 week), 12 weeks of follow-up (±2 weeks), and 1 year of follow-up (±2 months). If two visits occurred in the same range, the later visit was used. Baseline characteristics and numerous treatment-related factors were collected for each patient (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Patient factors and reference national averages

All
Category Variable No. of pts/value Percent of pts National average (%)
All 276 100 -
Baseline characteristics
 Age (years) Mean 60 - -
 Sex Female 58 21 -
Male 218 79 -
 Race/ethnicity Non-Hispanic White 147 53.3 60.711
Hispanic White 92 33.3 15.911
Black 17 6.2 13.411
Other/Unknown 20 7.2 1011
Social factors
 Income class by median household income Lower (<$45 600) 96 34.8 4012
Middle ($45 600-<$74869) 142 51.4 2012
Upper (≥$74 869) 31 11.2 4012
No address/out of country 7 2.5 -
 Primary language English 206 74.6 79.213
Spanish 63 22.8 12.913
Other 7 2.5 7.913.
 Marital status Married 186 67.4 48.414
Not married 88 31.9 51.614
Not documented 2 0.7 -
 Religion No affiliation 53 19.2 15.015
Any religion 184 66.7 85.015
Not documented 39 14.1 -
 Dependent children No 124 44.9 70.214
Yes 59 21.4 29.814
Not documented 93 33.7 -
 Living situation Alone 23 8.3 26.714
With family/others 172 62.3 73.314
Not documented 81 29.3 -
 Employment Employed 163 59.1 6311
Unemployed 68 24.6 3711
Not documented 45 16.3 -
 Insurance None 4 1.4 8.816
Private 131 47.5 67.216
Medicare 122 44.2 17.216
Medicaid 19 6.9 19.316
Medical factors
 Smoking/tobacco Never 116 42 54.617
Former 141 51.1 22.217
Current 18 6.5 23.317
Not documented 1 0.4 -
 Substance history stopped before intake Negative hx 236 85.5 -
Positive hx 40 14.5 -
 Substance history continued at intake No use 252 91.3 -
Pos use 24 8.7 -
 Psychiatric disorder None 255 92.4 -
Any 21 7.6 -
 Chronic pain condition None 175 63.4 -
Any pain 101 36.6 -
Oncologic factors
 Cancer histology Squamous cell carcinoma 224 81.2 -
Other cell carcinoma 52 18.8 -
 Cancer location Nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses 14 5.1 -
Oral cavity/salivary glands 98 35.5 -
Pharynx (naso, oro, hypo) 118 42.8 -
Larynx 46 16.7 -
 Cancer stage I-II 66 23.9 -
III-IV 204 73.9 -
Unknown 6 2.2 -
Treatment factors No 160 58 -
 Surgery Yes 116 42 -
 Chemotherapy No 150 54.3 -
Yes 126 45.7 -
 Total radiation exposure (Gy) Mean 66.2 - -
 Number of fractions Mean 32 - -
 Maximum opioid dose (MME/d) Mean 94.8 - -
 Opioid use at intake No 211 76.4 -
Yes 65 23.6 -
 Psychotropic/non-opioid analgesic use at intake No 139 50.4 -
Yes 137 49.6 -

Abbreviations: HW, Hispanic White; MME/d, morphine milligram equivalents per day; N.A., national average; NHW, non-Hispanic White; No., number; Pts, patients.

Opioid use data were obtained exclusively from the electronic medical record (EMR) as E-FORCSE, Florida’s prescription drug monitoring database, cannot be used for research purposes (personal communication, Florida Prescription Drug Monitoring Program, E. Marshall, B.S., 11/2017). The primary outcome was opioid use status at the 1-year follow-up visit. Continued, or long-term, opioid use was defined by the algorithm in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Algorithm for opioid use status at 1 year of follow-up. This algorithm was used from left to right to categorize patients’ opioid use status at the 1-year follow-up visit (gray boxes). Med, medication; Rx, prescription

Opioid dose was recorded at each visit and converted to morphine milligram equivalents per day (MME/d) using standard conversion ratios.18 It was calculated in this way to determine daily opioid consumption rates that allows for comparison between all patients. Daily consumption was determined by the following in order of priority: (a) description in the physician’s note, (b) total prescribed opioid dose divided by the number of days until the next refill, (c) total prescribed opioid dose divided by the number of days the medication was instructed to be used, or (d) total prescribed opioid dose divided by the number of days between the prescription date and the next follow-up visit.

History of substance use disorder was collected from the radiation oncology intake visit and defined by previous diagnosis of substance use disorder or documented recurrent use of any illegal substance, including marijuana. This was further categorized as either past use (ie, quit) or continued use at the intake visit. The presence of any chronic pain conditions were also collected from the intake visit and included any painful long-term or recurrent musculoskeletal, neurological, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary conditions.

2.3 |. Analysis

Continuous variables were summarized using descriptive statistics. Categorical variables were reported using counts and proportions. Due to small numbers of patients with long-term opioid use, we considered only univariable analysis. Univariable analysis was conducted to examine for associations between opioid use status at 1 year and various factors using a logistic regression model to estimate odds ratios, corresponding 95% confidence intervals, and P-values. All tests were two-sided and P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS (version 9.4).

A qualitative analysis was conducted on the patients with long-term opioid use. Case summaries were reported and categorized as either suspected opioid use disorder (OUD) or medically indicated based on the treating physicians’ reported reasons for continuing opioid therapy. The term suspected OUD was used to stratify patients with the highest likelihood of having an OUD. It was defined by physician documented suspicion for opioid misuse, addiction, or OUD. The term medically indicated was used to stratify patients with the lowest likelihood of having an OUD. It was defined by the absence of documented physician suspicion for OUD with clear documentation of a pain syndrome that led the treating physician to continue opioid treatment. Any patient who continued using opioids without clear documentation of a pain syndrome was assigned to the suspected OUD group.

3 |. RESULTS

A list of 678 head/neck cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy between 2013 and mid-2017 was obtained from the institution’s Tumor Registry. Of these, 276 were included. Figure 2 highlights the exclusion process with patient counts for each exclusion.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Exclusion process and counts. Patients were sequentially excluded for the above reasons (gray boxes). White boxes represent patients who were not excluded. Dx, diagnosis; H/N, head and neck; LR, locoregional; RT, radiotherapy; SPM, second primary malignancy; Sx, symptom

Patients’ baseline characteristics and reported reference national averages are presented in Table 1. Patients were predominantly male (79%) and non-Hispanic White (53%) or Hispanic White (33%) with a mean and median age of 60.

A total of 20/276 (7.2%) patients continued using opioids at 1 year of follow-up. Analysis of factors for association with long-term opioid use are presented in Table 2. The factors associated significantly with long-term opioid use were maximum opioid dose (P = .005) and use of psychotropics/non-opioid analgesics at the intake visit (P = .010). In addition, patients who started opioid use for cancer-related or cancer treatment-related pain before radiotherapy (ie, pre-radiation opioid use) had a rate of long-term opioid use of 20% (13/64) compared to a rate of 3% (7/212) for patients who started opioid use during or after radiotherapy (P = .001).

TABLE 2.

Association between patient factors and outcomes

Continued opioids
Discontinued opioids
Category Variable No. of pts/value Percent of pts (%) No. of pts/Value Percent of pts (%) OR (95% CI) P value
All 20 7.2 256 92.8 - -
Baseline characteristics
 Age (years) Mean 57.3 - 60.2 0.97 (0.93, 1.02) .242
 Sex Female 3 5.2 55 94.8 Reference
Male 17 7.8 201 92.2 1.38 (0.42, 4.55) .599
 Race/ethnicity Non-Hispanic White 11 7.5 136 92.5 Reference
Hispanic White 7 7.6 85 92.4 1.04 (0.40, 2.73) .935
Black 2 11.8 15 88.2 1.91 (0.43, 8.59) .397
Other/Unknown 0 0 20 100 0.29 (0.02, 5.46) .408
Social factors
 Income class by median household income Lower (<$45 600) 4 4.2 92 95.8 Reference
Middle ($45 600-<$74869) 12 8.5 130 91.5 1.97 (0.65, 6.01) .234
Upper (≥$74 869) 4 12.9 27 87.1 3.36 (0.84, 13.49) .087
No address/out of country 0 0 7 100 NE NE
 Primary language English 17 8.3 189 91.7 Reference
Spanish 3 4.8 60 95.2 0.63 (0.19, 2.06) .442
Other 0 0 7 100 0.72 (0.03, 16.02) .837
 Marital status Married 13 7 173 93 Reference
Not married 7 8 81 92 1.18 (0.46, 3.01) .725
Not documented 0 0 2 100 2.57 (0.06, 110.41) .623
 Religion No affiliation 6 11.3 47 88.7 Reference
Any religion 14 7.6 170 92.4 1.18 (0.46, 3.01) .725
Not documented 0 0 39 100 2.57 (0.06, 110.41) .623
 Dependent children No 11 8.9 113 91.1 Reference
Yes 5 8.5 54 91.5 1.00 (0.34, 2.91) .994
Not documented 4 4.3 89 95.7 0.50 (0.16, 1.54) .224
 Living situation Alone 2 8.7 21 91.3 Reference
With family/others 15 8.7 157 91.3 0.85 (0.20, 3.56) .82
Not documented 3 3.7 78 96.3 0.38 (0.07, 2.14) .274
 Employment Employed 12 7.4 151 92.6 Reference
Unemployed 4 5.9 64 94.1 0.85 (0.28, 2.60) .77
Not documented 4 8.9 41 91.1 1.31 (0.42,4.11) .639
 Insurance None 0 0 4 100 Reference
Private 8 6.1 123 93.9 0.62 (0.02, 17.47) .779
Medicare 10 8.2 112 91.8 0.84 (0.03, 23.40) .918
Medicaid 2 10.5 17 89.5 1.29 (0.04, 44.20) .889
Medical factors
 Smoking/tobacco Never 9 7.8 107 92.2 Reference
Former 10 7.1 131 92.9 0.90 (0.36, 2.26) .828
Current 1 5.6 17 94.4 0.97 (0.15, 6.10) .974
Not documented 0 0 1 100 3.71 (0.04, 366.82) 0.576
 Substance history stopped before intake Negative hx 16 6.8 220 93.2 Reference
Positive hx 4 10 36 90 1.65 (0.54, 5.00) .378
 Substance history continued at intake No use 17 6.7 235 93.3 Reference
Pos use 3 12.5 21 87.5 2.19 (0.63, 7.66) .219
 Psychiatric disorder None 17 6.7 238 93.3 Reference
Any 3 14.3 18 85.7 2.58 (0.73, 9.15) .143
 Chronic pain condition None 12 6.9 163 93.1 Reference
Any pain 8 7.9 93 92.1 1.19 (0.48, 2.96) 0.71
Oncologic factors
 Cancer histology Squamous cell carcinoma 17 7.6 207 92.4 Reference
Other cell carcinoma 3 5.8 49 94.2 0.84 (0.25, 2.78) .773
 Cancer location Nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses 2 14.3 12 85.7 Reference
Oral cavity/salivary glands 8 8.2 90 91.8 0.47 (0.10, 2.26) .346
Pharynx (naso, oro, hypo) 8 6.8 110 93.2 0.39 (0.08, 1.85) .233
Larynx 2 4.3 44 95.7 0.28 (0.04, 1.89) .192
 Cancer stage I-II 5 7.6 61 92.4 Reference
III-IV 15 7.4 189 92.6 0.91 (0.33, 2.54) .864
Unknown 0 0 6 100 0.86 (0.03, 21.72) .927
Treatment factors
 Surgery No 9 5.6 151 94.4 Reference
Yes 11 9.5 105 90.5 1.74 (0.71, 4.27) .227
 Chemotherapy No 11 7.3 139 92.7 Reference
Yes 9 7.1 117 92.9 0.98 (0.40, 2.40) .966
 Total radiation exposure (Gy) Mean 64.8 - 66.3 - 0.96 (0.90, 1.02) .178
 Number of fractions Mean 32.1 - 32 - 0.98 (0.83, 1.15) .806
 Maximum opioid dose (MME/d) Mean 155.1 - 89.8 - 1.12a (1.03, 1.21) .005
 Opioid use at intake No 7 3.3 204 96.7 Reference
Yes 13 20.0 52 80.0 7.01 (2.72, 18.07) .001
 Psychotropic/non-opioid analgesic use at intake No 4 2.9 135 97.1 Reference
Yes 16 11.7 121 88.3 4.09 (1.40, 11.97) .010

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HW, Hispanic White; MME/d, morphine milligram equivalents per day; N.A., national average; NE, not examined; NNHW, non-Hispanic White; No., number; OR, odds ratio; Pts, patients.

a

Odds ratio for every 20 units increased in maximum opioid dose.

The progression of opioid use statuses over the course of 1 year is shown for both groups in Figure 3. Peak prevalence of opioid use was at 6 weeks of radiotherapy. The specific opioid agents used at each visit are displayed in Figure 4 (excluding cases in which opioid agents were not specified).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Opioid use patterns over 1 year. The left-most column shows the percentages of patients using opioids (purple) and not using opioids (green) at the intake visit. The next column to the right subdivides the two groups from the first column into a total of four groups based on any changes in opioid use status between the first and second visit. The new subgroups and the groups they divided from maintain the same position on the chart as the previous visit. Each subsequent visit further subdivides each group while maintaining the positions of the previous visit. The cumulative effect displays all patterns of opioid use, and their frequencies, over 1 year. FU, follow up; RT, radiotherapy

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Opioid agents at each visit. This figure demonstrates the frequency at which opioid agents were used at key time points in the patients’ treatment course. FU, follow up; RT, radiotherapy

Case summaries of patients with long-term opioid use are presented in Table 3. Based on the treating physicians’ documentation, 17 of 20 (85% or 6.1% of the total cohort) were categorized as medically indicated and 3 of 20 as suspected OUD (15% or 1.1% of the total cohort). In two of the patients with suspected OUD, the treating radiation oncologist documented a suspicion for OUD. One of these patients was referred to a pain specialist for management and the other was lost to follow-up 14 months after radiotherapy. In the third case, a pain syndrome was not clearly delineated and the indications for prescribing opioids were not documented. The patient received a prescription of tramadol from his oncologist 13 months after completing radiotherapy, but no additional opioids were prescribed or pain syndrome delineated in the subsequent 3 years of follow-up.

TABLE 3.

Case summaries of long-term opioid use

Ref. No. Basic demographics Cancer factors Cancer treatment Pain medication at intake Pain medication at 1y FU Records of pain meds beyond 1y FU Description of continued opioid use
Suspected opioid use disorder 1 52yo
Hispanic White
Male
Never smoker
English
SCC
Tongue base
Stage 3
Chemoradiation with 70GY (2GY x 35fx) Fentanyl
Oxycodone
184.29 MME
Acetaminophen
Oxycodone
7.5 MME
Acetaminophen
Last follow-up was 14 months after radiotherapy and the last opioid prescription expired 16mo after completing radiotherapy Xerostomia. 12mo after radiotherapy, physician noted: “I am concerned that he has become addicted [to oxycodone]”
2 51yo
Hispanic White
Male
Former smoker
English
SCC
Tongue
Stage 4A
Surgery (partial glossectomy and modified radical unilateral neck dissection) followed by radiotherapy with 60GY (2 GY x 30fx) Oxycodone MME CNBC Acetaminophen Codeine
Nine MME
Acetaminophen
Referred to pain management. Discontinued all opioids <18mo after completing radiotherapy. Physician noted that patient had recovered from all side effects 12mo after completing radiotherapy, but required help tapering off opioids.
3 61yo
Non-Hispanic black
Male
Former smoker
English
Lymphoepithelial carcinoma Nasopharynx Stage 2 Chemoradiation with 69.96GY (2.12GY x 33fx) Oxycodone
MME CNBC
Acetaminophen
Benzodiazepine
Zolpidem
Tramadol
MME CNBC (could not be calculated)
“Rare use” of left over oxycodone at a visit 12mo after completing radiotherapy. Patient received one prescription for tramadol at 13mo with end date at 19mo. No subsequent opioids were prescribed. Documented opioid use, but no clear documented indication.
Medical indication 4 46yo
Non-Hispanic White
Male
Former smoker
English
SCC
Maxillary sinus Stage 4A
Surgery (enucleation) followed by chemoradiation with 60GY (2GY x 30fx) Oxycodone
7.5 MME
Acetaminophen
Oxycodone
7.5 MME
Acetaminophen
Biotene
SNRI
The most recent record was by pain management 14mo after completing radiotherapy and the patient was continuing gabapentin and tramadol (15 MME). Neuropathic facial pain in region of enucleation with flap.
5 30yo
Female
Hispanic White
Former smoker
English
SCC
Tongue base
Stage 3
Surgery (glossectomy and neck dissection) followed by radiotherapy with 60GY (2GY x 20fx) Acetaminophen
NSAIDs
Tramadol
2.5 MME
Gabapentin
NSAIDs
Patient was managed by pain management for 4mo after radiotherapy, but did not follow up after that. She underwent physical therapy and numerous cervical nerve blocks. She discontinued opioids 20mo after completing radiotherapy. Chronic neck and upper back myofascial and neuropathic pain
6 63yo
Male
Hispanic White
Former smoker
Spanish
SCC
Tongue base
Stage 4A
Surgery (segmental mandibulectomy, tonsil resection, partial glossectomy, and anterolateral thigh flap) followed by radiotherapy with 60GY (2 GY x 60fx) Oxycodone
21.44 MME
Acetaminophen
Gabapentin
Oxycodone
15 MME
Acetaminophen
Gabapentin
Followed up with pain management 20mo after radiotherapy. The most recent record was 33mo after radiotherapy and patient was continuing tramadol (7.4 MME) due to necrosis of the mandible and suspected bone exposure. Neuropathic neck pain on the side of surgery and moderate–severe odynophagia causing PEG dependence
7 68yo
Non-Hispanic White
Male
Never smoker
English
SCC
Tongue base
Stage 4A
Chemoradiation with 69.96GY (2.12GY × 33fx) Oxycodone
22.5 MME
Acetaminophen
Oxycodone
15 MME
Oxycodone
15 MME
Acetaminophen
Biotene
NSAIDs
Discontinued all opioids 15mo after completing radiotherapy. No pain management follow up. Persistent odynophagia and xerostomia that was not controlled with NSAIDs, but was with oxycodone.
8 71yo
Hispanic White
Male
Former smoker
Spanish
SCC
Supraglottis
Stage 2
Chemoradiation with 70GY (2 GY X 35fx) NSAIDs Guaifenesin-codeine
MME CNBC
Discontinued all opioids 22mo after completing radiotherapy. Patient did not use opioids during radiotherapy, but started guaifenesin-codeine shortly before 1 year of follow up due to laryngeal edema.
9 64yo
Male
Non-Hispanic White
Former smoker
English
SCC
Nasal cavity
Stage 4A
Chemoradiation with 69.96GY (2.12GY × 33fx) None Codeine
Fentanyl
66.43 MME
Acetaminophen
Discontinued all opioids 15mo after completing radiotherapy. He did not follow up with pain management. Stopped opioids when radiotherapy was complete. Underwent resection/debridement at 9mo of follow up for suspected recurrence, but pathology was negative. Patient had chronic sinusitis with drainage and pain after procedure that was not controlled with NSAIDs.
10 58yo
Non-Hispanic White
Male
Former smoker
English
SCC
Larynx, overlapping lesion
Stage 4A
Surgery (total laryngectomy, lymph node dissection, and anterolateral thigh flap) followed by chemoradiation with 60GY (2GY × 30fx) Oxycodone
12.5 MME
Acetaminophen
NSAIDs
Oxycodone
30 MME
Acetaminophen
NSAIDs
Underwent physical therapy, cervical nerve blocks x7, and a shoulder injection. The most recent record was by pain management 38mo after radiotherapy and patient was continuing oxycodone and buprenorphine. Patient had cervical spondylosis that began 1 year before cancer. He started opioids for cancer pain and continued for mutli-factorial cervical pain (post-surgical pain, multiple sites of severe cervical degeneration, osteophytes, and disc protrusion) and shoulder pain.
11 48yo
Hispanic White
Male
Never smoker
Spanish
SCC
Tonsil
Stage 4B
Surgery (unilateral excision of tonsillar fossa mass and debulking) followed by chemoradiation with, 69.96GY (2.12GY × 33fx) Oxycodone
33.75 MME
Acetaminophen
Tramadol
12.5 MME
Managed by pain management 5-17mo after radiotherapy. Underwent multiple pharyngeal dilations. All opioids (tramadol) were discontinued 31mo after radiotherapy. PEG dependence at 1 year of follow up due to neuropathic pain (CNIX), severe trismus with very limited mouth opening, and esophageal stricture with dilations x2.
12 51yo
Non-Hispanic White
Male
Current smoker
English
SCC
Tonsil
Stage 4A
Surgery (radical resection of tonsil, tongue base, and hypopharynx and modified radical neck dissection) followed by chemoradiation with 66GY (2 GY x 33fx) None Fentanyl
Oxycodone
55.05 MME
Kenalog injection in oropharynx. Followed by pain management from 4 weeks before radiotherapy to 23mo after completing radiotherapy. Discontinued all opioids 25mo after radiotherapy. Oropharyngeal pain at resection scar with scarring of vallecula and supraglottis causing distortion of epiglottis with suspected lingual nerve involvement.
13 55yo
Non-Hispanic White
Male
Former smoker
English
Papillary SCC
Pharynx
Stage 4A
Chemoradiation with 69.96GY (2.12GY X 33fx) Oxycodone
8.04 MME
Acetaminophen
Methadone
Oxycodone
276 MME
Acetaminophen
Followed by pain management 5-16mo after completing radiotherapy. Patient’s last recorded prescriptions included oxycodone and methadone (MME 276) from pain management. There are no records beyond 16mo. Stopped all opioids by 6 weeks of follow up. Restarted due to chondroradionecrosis of the larynx.
14 63yo
Non-Hispanic White
Male
Never smoker
English
SCC
Tonsil
Stage 4A
Surgery (radical tonsillectomy, partial
pharyngectomy,
partial
glossectomy, and unilateral neck dissection) followed by chemoradiation with 66GY (2 GY × 33fx)
None Tramadol
19.15 MME
Acetaminophen
Managed by pain management 7-15mo after radiotherapy. The most recent record was 43mo after radiotherapy and patient was continuing tramadol (MME CNBC) Oral pain, suspected to be neuropathic. Pain management describes pain in detail and recommended use of tramadol.
15 64yo
Non-Hispanic White
Male
Never smoker
English
SCC
Tonsil
Stage 1
Surgery (tonsillectomy, pharyngectomy, and glossectomy) followed by chemoradiation, 64GY
(2 GY × 34fx)
Oxycodone
90 MME
Acetaminophen
Fentanyl
Oxycodone
210 MME
Acetaminophen
Managed by pain management 30mo after radiotherapy to the present. The most recent record was 49mo after RT and patient was continuing oxycodone and fentanyl 210 MME. Physician noted no aberrancies on E-FORCSE. Osteoradionecrosis of mandible.
16 67yo
Non-Hispanic White
Female
Former smoker
English
SCC
Tongue border
Stage 2
Surgery (left glossectomy, left neck dissection, tracheostomy, right radical free forearm flap) followed by radiotherapy with 60GY
(2GY x 30fx)
Oxycodone
11.25 MME
Acetaminophen
Benzodiazepine
SSRI
Oxycodone
11.03 MME
Acetaminophen
Magic mix
Discontinued all opioids 18mo after completing radiotherapy when oral ulcers resolved. Stopped opioids 2mo after completing radiotherapy. Restarted at 12mo FU for approximately 6mo for recurring oral ulcers. Biopsies x4 were negative for recurrence.
17 57yo
Hispanic White
Male
Never smoker
English
Basaloid SCC
Tonsil
Stage 4A
Chemoradiation with 70GY (2 GY X 35fx) Benzodiazepine
SSRI
Zolpidem
Oxycodone 257.15 second generation anti-psychotic
Benzodiazepine
SSRI
Managed by pain management long-term. Began exhibiting aberrant/addictive behavior between 24–36mo after completing radiotherapy. Marijuana, cocaine, and non-prescribed buprenorphine were detected in urine. Patient filled benzodiazepine and zolpidem prescriptions monthly, but these were not detected in urine. Opioids were Osteoradionecrosis and severe trismus (mouth opening 1–1.5 cm) causing G-tube dependence.
18 54yo
Non-Hispanic White
Male
Never smoker
English
Lymphoma,
NK/T-cell, nasal & nasal-type
Hard palate
Stage 2A
Chemoradiation with 50.4GY (1.8Gy x 28fx) Fentanyl
120 MME
Hydromorphone
56 MME
The most recent record was 26mo after radiotherapy and patient was continuing fentanyl and oxycodone (MME CNBC). He had follow-up with pain management while undergoing radiotherapy, but none after treatment. Chronic sinus infection with discharge and headaches. This required hard palate debridement 13mo after completing radiotherapy followed by multiple intermittent debridements.
19 35yo
Non-Hispanic White
Male
Never smoker
English
SCC
Pyriformis sinus
Stage 3
Chemoradiation with 70GY (2 GY × 35fx) NSAIDs Oxycodone
27.78 MME
Anti-histamine
Magic mix
NSAIDs
Sodium selenite
Zolpidem
Followed by pain specialists 17-66mo after radiotherapy. Discontinued all opioids 39mo after completing radiotherapy. Re-irradiation after childhood lymphoma. Very severe dysphagia with complete hypopharynx stricture requiring multiple dilations and PEG dependence.
20 87yo
Non-Hispanic black
Female
Never smoker
English
SCC
Mouth floor
Stage 4A
Surgery (segmental mandibulectomy, resection of the mouth floor and ventral tongue, bilateral lymph node dissections, and fibula free flap reconstruction) followed by radiotherapy with 60GY (2GY × 30fx) Hydrocodone
Oxycodone
MME CNBC
Acetaminophen
NSAIDs
Oxycodone
30 MME
Acetaminophen
Discontinued all opioids 21mo after completing radiotherapy. She had no pain management follow up. Osteoradionecrosis and bone/plate exposure requiring debridement and local flap at 8mo after radiotherapy. Plate exposed again which required removal 20mo after radiotherapy.

Abbreviations: CNBC, could not be calculated; FU, follow up; fx, fraction(s); MME, morphine milligram equivalents/day; Mo, month(s); No., number; NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; Pt, patient; Ref., reference; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; SSR1, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; SNRI, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor; y, year; yo, year old.

4 |. DISCUSSION

This is the first report describing long-term outcomes (≥1 year) of treating patients undergoing curative-intent radiotherapy with opioids to manage pain from tumor or treatment. We identified 20 of 276 (7.2%) head/neck cancer patients who continued using opioids 1 year after radiotherapy. All or none of these 20 patients may have continued due to medical indications and all or none may have continued due to OUD (0%−7.2% of the total cohort). However, qualitative analysis of the physician records suggests that 17 of 20 (85% or 6.1% of the total cohort) continued due to clearly documented pain syndromes, mainly related to overt complications such as osteoradionecrosis. The other 3 of 20 (15% or 1.1% of the total cohort) were suspected by the treating physician to have an OUD or the reasons for continuation were not documented. These findings suggest that, among head/neck cancer patients without persistent or recurrent disease after radiotherapy, long-term opioid use is due primarily to medical indications rather than suspected OUD. Further, at least two of the three patients with suspected OUD discontinued opioids within 2 years of completing radiotherapy (18 and 19 months, one patient was lost to follow-up after 14 months) suggesting that OUD causing indefinite opioid use is very uncommon.

Our findings differ from a previous review synthesizing 34 studies on OUD in cancer patients that reported approximately 1 out of 5 (20%) are at risk of developing an OUD based on screening questionnaires and urine drug screens.19 However, the studies used in the review were conducted primarily in palliative and end-of-life care patients rather than curative-cancer treatment patients. A distinction between these populations is important. Patients in this study undergoing curative-intent therapy appeared to have a comparatively low rate of suspected OUD (1.1%) based on their treating physicians’ documented interviews and assessments. This may be due to the methodology of assessment for OUD. If the screening methods in the review were used on our cohort, the suspected OUD rate at 1 year could in theory include all 20 of the patients with long-term opioid use (7.2% of the cohort). This conservative estimate would be considerably higher than the rate we obtained by categorizing the treating physicians’ documented interviews and assessments (1.1% of the cohort), but would remain markedly lower than the previously reported 20% for palliative and end-of-life care patients. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report such an outcome so there are no available comparisons in the literature. However, there is an abundance of research on the pervasive problem of undertreatment of cancer pain. Two meta-analyses found approximately 33%−50% of cancer patients are undertreated for pain.20,21 This is associated with poorer quality of life, greater depression, and more emergency room visits and hospital admissions.22 Undertreatment of pain is often due to patient and provider fear of triggering an OUD.23 Based on the findings in this study, the risk of this outcome appears to be low in the curative cancer treatment setting.

The risks of opioid use are not negligible and risk stratification is an important aspect of opioid management. High maximum opioid dose and opioid initiation for cancer-related pain before radiotherapy were found to be associated with long-term opioid use. These associations may have been due to more severe complications of treatment, such as osteoradionecrosis, or due to the addictive properties of opioids. The more severe complications explanation suggests pre-radiation opioid use and maximum opioid dose may be markers of excessive pain requiring aggressive opioid management, rather than underlying causes of long-term use. For example, surgical patients tended to use opioids before radiotherapy more than nonsurgical patients. This may be because opioids are routinely prescribed in combination with non-opioid analgesics to manage postoperative pain. The addition of postoperative radiotherapy likely increases the risk of chronic pain syndromes (eg, trismus, neck fibrosis) that require more aggressive and long-term opioid management. The use of opioids at the intake visit could, therefore, be considered an early marker of patients who are at increased risk of long-term complications of cancer treatment.

Another possible reason high maximum dose and pre-radiation opioid use were associated with long-term opioid use is because of the addictive properties of opioids. Previous reports have linked both high doses of opioids and long duration of use to OUD.24 In our cohort, longer durations of opioid use occurred in patients who started opioids before radiotherapy and continued through at least 6 weeks of treatment, including the three patients with suspected OUD. The longer duration of use in the first year of radiotherapy may have contributed to these three being assigned to the suspected OUD group. Duration and high maximum opioid dose may also explain the outcome of patient #17 in Table 3 who had a maximum opioid dose of 600 MME/d and who continued using opioids for at least 2 years after radiotherapy. He continued opioid use for medical indications (osteoradionecrosis and severe trismus limiting mouth opening to 1–1.5 cm), but began displaying aberrant/addictive behavior at 24 months of follow-up. This suggests severe treatment complications and the addictive properties of opioids may both be important contributors to long-term opioid use with varying influences in different patients at different time points. An awareness of maximum opioid dose and pre-radiation opioid use as overall risk factors for long-term use may enable clinicians to identify groups of patients who could benefit from additional attention, possibly from pain management specialists, to wean off opioids as their sources of pain resolve.

This study was conducted in head/neck cancer, but the findings may be applicable to the use of opioids in other curative cancer treatment settings. Head/neck patients are known to have the highest prevalence of pain of all cancer sites.5 They also have the highest association with alcohol use and one of the highest associations with tobacco use.25 In our cohort, 58% had past or current tobacco use and 23% had past or current nontobacco substance use disorders. Despite these risk factors for misuse, patients had relatively low rates of longterm opioid use (7.2%) and long-term use due to suspected OUD (1.1%).26 If other cancer populations have comparable or fewer risk factors for OUD, the risks of opioid treatment for those patients may be similar or even better than that seen in this study. Clinicians from many areas of oncology treating with curative intent might consider using the risk profiles and outcomes demonstrated in this study to contribute to clinical decision-making and discussions with patients regarding the risks and benefits of opioid use for managing pain related to cancer and/or cancer treatment. Further, the data from this study may have implications for state and federal regulation as policy makers consider the degree to which cancer patients should be included in ever-tightening limitations on opioid prescribing implemented in response to the opioid epidemic in the United States.

The primary limitation of this study is its retrospective nature. Florida’s controlled substance monitoring database, E-FORCSE, was not available because Florida law does not permit its use for research purposes (personal communication, Florida Prescription Drug Monitoring Program, E. Marshall, B.S., 11/2017). As a result, data collection was limited to the institutional EMR. This likely affected data related to opioid use statuses, opioid doses, and qualitative assessments. Most radiation oncologists’ notes provided detailed descriptions of opioid use, but few notes from other specialists did, causing opioid data to be derived from less reliable medication lists. In addition, opioids prescribed by providers outside our institution might not have been accounted for. A prospective study could be designed to improve the integrity of opioid use data with (a) access to a drug monitoring database, (b) tracking of opioid doses between visits (maximum opioid dose was likely underreported in many patients without this), (c) detailed questionnaires regarding pain assessments, (d) more aggressive effort to ensure patients followed up at 1 year (±2 months), and (e) evaluation of substance use with periodic urine tests.

Another limitation of this study was patient selection from a single academic hospital. This may introduce a bias relating to the patient population the hospital serves. However, the baseline characteristics presented in Table 1 were fairly representative of national averages with the exception that our cohort included a relatively high minority representation with Hispanic ethnicity at 37% and non-English primary language at 25%. Comparing the demographics and outcomes of our cohort with non-academic hospitals and hospitals in different states would help confirm the applicability of our results to the rest of the country.

5 |. CONCLUSION

In an academic hospital population of head/neck cancer patients without evidence of persistent or recurrent disease who were treated with radiotherapy and given opioids for pain control, the incidence of continued opioid use at 1 year was 7.2%. Secondary qualitative analysis of each case of continued opioid use suggests well-documented continuing pain syndromes in 6.1% and suspected OUD in 1.1% of the cohort. High maximum opioid dose and opioid use for cancer-related pain before radiotherapy were associated with long-term opioid use. These may be due to the addictive properties of opioids or to more long-term pain issues relating to surgery or to the combination of surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. Given head/neck cancer’s high prevalence of pain and high correlation with substances of abuse, clinicians and regulators should consider that the results from this study may be applicable to the use of opioids in other curative-intent cancer populations with similar or better risk profiles for opioid misuse. In the setting of an opioid epidemic, these results may inform decision-making for clinicians relating to their individual patients and for regulators at the state and national levels.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Rutkow L, Vernick JS. Emergency legal authority and the opioid crisis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2512–2514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain—United States, 2016. JAMA. 2016; 315:1624–1645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Florida Chapter 2018–13. 2018. http://laws.flrules.org/files/Ch_2018_013.pdf
  • 4.Florida House Bill No. 451. 2019. https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2019/451/BillText/er/PDF [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Van den Beuken-van Everdingen M, de Rijke J, Kessels A, et al. Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the past 40 years. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:1437–1449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Marur S, D’Souza G, Westra WH, et al. HPV-associated head and neck cancer: a virus-related cancer epidemic. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:781–789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McDermott JD, Eguchi M, Stokes WA, et al. Short- and long-term opioid use in patients with oral and oropharynx cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;160:409–419. 10.1177/0194599818808513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cass AS, Alese JT, Kim C, et al. Analysis of opioid use following curative cancer treatment at a large urban safety-net hospital. Clin J Pain. 2018;34:885–889. 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kwon JH, Hui D, Chisholm G, Bruera E. Predictors of long-term opioid treatment among patients who receive chemoradiation for head and neck cancer. Oncologist. 2013;18:768–774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Smith WH, Luskin I, Resende Salgado L, et al. Risk of prolonged opioid use among cancer patients undergoing curative intent radiation therapy for head and neck malignancies. Oral Oncol. 2019;92:1–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.US Census Bureau: QuickFacts United States, Population Estimates, July 1, 2018, (V2018), https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045218
  • 12.Semega JL, Fontenot KR, Kollar MA. Income and Poverty in the United States: 2016. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2017: 60–259. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ryan C. Language Use in the United States: 2011. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lofquist D, Lugaila T, O’Connell M, et al. Households and Families: 2010. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2012. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Berchick ER, Hood E, Barnett JC. Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2017. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2018:60–264. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Giovino GA. Epidemiology of tobacco use in the United States. Oncogene. 2002;21:7326–7340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Con Korff M, Saunders K, Thomas Ray G, et al. De facto long-term opioid therapy for noncancer pain. Clin J Pain. 2014;30: 830 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Carmichael A-N, Morgan L, Del Fabbro E. Identifying and assessing the risk of opioid abuse in patients with cancer: an integrative review. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2016;7:71–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Deandrea S, Montanari M, Moja L, Apolone G. Prevalence of undertreatment in cancer pain. A review of published literature. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:1985–1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Greco MT, Roberto A, Corli O, et al. Quality of cancer pain management: an update of a systematic review of undertreatment of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32: 4149–4154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang C-H, Lee S-YC. Undertreatment of caner pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2015;53:58–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Minozzi S, Amato L, Davoli M. Development of dependence following treatment with opioid analgesics for pain relief: a systematic review. Addiction. 2013;108:688–698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Volkow ND, Thomas McLellan A. Opioid abuse in chronic pain—misconceptions and mitigation strategies. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1253–1263. 10.1056/nejmra1507771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stewart BW, Wild CP. World Cancer Report 2014. Geneva: Switzerland, World Health Organization; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Webster LR. Risk factors for opioid-use disorder and overdose. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(5):1741–1748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES