Abstract
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is intractable and severely affects a patient’s quality of life. Although many cases of MRONJ have been reported in the past decade, the disease pathophysiology is unclear and there are no evidence-based therapeutic strategies. MRONJ usually features bone inflammation and infection. Prior studies that explored the association between MRONJ and microbial infection used the culture-based approach, which is not applicable to hundreds of unculturable taxa in the human oral microbiome, or 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing, which does not provide quantitative information of the abundance of specific taxa, and information of the presence, abundance, and function of specific genes in the microbiome. Here, deep shotgun metagenome sequencing (>10 Gb per sample) of bulk DNA extracted from saliva of MRONJ patients and healthy controls was performed to overcome these limitations. Comparative quantitative analyses of taxonomic and functional composition of these deep metagenomes (initially of 5 patients and 5 healthy controls) revealed an average 10.1% increase of genus Actinomyces and a 33.2% decrease in genus Streptococcus normally predominant in the human oral microbiota. Pan-genome analysis identified genes present exclusively in the MRONJ samples. Further analysis of the reads mapping to the genes in the extended dataset comprising five additional MRONJ samples and publicly available dataset of nine healthy controls resulted in the identification of 31 genes significantly associated with MRONJ. All these genes were encoded by Actinomyces genomic regions. Of these, the top two abundant genes were almost exclusively encoded by Actinomyces among usual taxa in the human oral microbiota. The potential relationships of these key genes with the disease are discussed at molecular level based on the literature. Although the sample size was small, this study will aid future studies to verify the data and characterize these genes in vitro and in vivo to understand the disease mechanisms, develop molecular targeted drugs, and for early stage screening and prognosis prediction.
Introduction
Bisphosphonates (BPs) reduce bone resorption by inhibiting osteoclasts. BPs are widely used to treat many diseases, including malignant neoplasm, multiple myeloma, and osteoporosis [1]. Patients treated with BPs and invasive dental treatment sometimes suffer BP-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ), which has been reported since 2003 [2]. BRONJ has also been reported among patients treated using the denosumab human monoclonal antibody that binds to the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL). Denosumab treatment can reduce bone resorption, which prompted the general term “antiresorptive agent-induced ONJ” (ARONJ) [3] that corresponds to the disease related to the administration of antiresorptive therapeutic agents. The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) proposed the general term of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in a 2014 position paper [4], since the condition can also occur in patients treated with biological medications that lack antiresorptive properties [5]. MRONJ is intractable and severely affects a patient’s quality of life by causing pain and difficulty in eating and worsening oral hygiene. Although many cases of MRONJ have been reported in the past decade, the disease pathophysiology is unclear and there are no strictly-defined therapeutic strategies [6]. MRONJ remains a major concern with dentists, oncologists, rheumatologists, and general practitioners [7].
According to a consensus report published by the International Task Force on Osteonecrosis of the Jaw, the incidence of BRONJ in osteoporosis patients treated with low-dose oral BPs ranges from 1.04 to 69.0 per 100,000 patient-years, while that in bone cancer patients treated with high-dose intravenous BPs ranges from 0 to 12,222 per 100,000 patient-years [8]. The Japanese Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons identified 4,797 cases from January 2011 through December 2013, in which patients who received oral BPs accounted for 49.2% [9]. A previous study reported 67% of BRONJ cases were preceded by tooth extraction, which likely triggered onset [10]. Another study reported tooth extraction was associated with a 18 times higher incidence of BRONJ [11].
BPs have been the most popular antiresorptive drugs. BPs act by binding the mineral component of bone and interfering with the action of osteoclasts. The discovery of RANKL and the essential role of RANK signaling in osteoclasts led to the development of denosumab. Although BPs and denosumab are mechanistically distinct antiresorptive agents, the incidence of MRONJ is similar [12]. A characteristic of MRONJ is its association with the use of the antiresorptive therapies. Thus, quantification of bone resorption was previously explored for prognosis. No marker was established [8]. No single model can fully explain morphological changes observed in MRONJ at the macro- and microscopic levels. However, several unique features are evident. MRONJ lesions are characterized by scattered areas of necrotic bone, as evidenced by empty osteocyte lacunae [13]. Secondly, bone inflammation and infection are usually associated with MRONJ, and bone invasion by Actinomyces was observed in 82.18% of patients [14].
Previous studies that explored associations between MRONJ and infection of microbes were based on culturing, mass spectrometry, or sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene [15, 16]. Given that over nearly 250 of approximately 700 taxa at the species level in the human oral bacteriome are as yet uncultivated [17], the culture-based approach has obvious limitations and might have missed unculturable microbes associated with MRONJ. While 16S rRNA gene sequencing improved the limitations, it cannot give quantitative information of abundance of specific taxa in the microbiome. Therefore, the contribution to MRONJ of the increased prevalence of specific microbial taxa in the oral microbiome remains unknown. Furthermore, 16S rRNA gene sequencing provides no information of the presence, abundance, and function of specific genes in the microbiome.
Here, we conducted shotgun metagenome sequencing (>10 Gb per sample) of bulk DNA extracted from saliva of MRONJ patients and healthy controls collected and stored using a kit specialized for microbial and viral DNA/RNA. The approach overcame the limitations of 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Through comparative quantitative analyses of taxonomic and functional composition of these deep metagenomes, we identified a set of microbial genes almost specific to MRONJ that are exclusively encoded by Actinomyces and increased in abundance.
Materials and methods
Diagnostic criteria
This study followed the AAOMS definition of BRONJ, which requires the presence of all of the following: 1) current or previous treatment with BP; 2) no history of radiation therapy to the jaws or obvious metastatic disease to the jaws; and 3) exposed bone or bone that can be probed though an intra or extraoral fistula in the maxillofacial region that has persisted > 8 weeks after identification by medical staff [4]. To exclude the effect of antibiotic treatment, we included only cases before treatment for MRONJ (but not the underlying condition). The inclusion criteria for this were 0 and 1 stage BRONJ based on a previous position paper [18].
Sample collection, DNA extraction, and metagenome sequencing
Based on previous reports that microbial profiles within subjects were stable throughout a 24-h period [19] and the similar profiles of unstimulated and stimulated saliva [20], 1 mL unstimulated saliva was collected and stored using a kit specialized for microbial and viral DNA/RNA (OMNIgene ORAL OM-501) from 5 MRONJ patients (one man, 4 women; 56-to-95 years old). The participants were instructed not to eat, drink, brush their teeth, or gargle for at least 1 h prior to sampling. Unstimulated saliva had recently been collected from 4 healthy volunteers and stored in the same way. The samples were used for DNA extraction and metagenome sequencing as described below. The metagenome data are publicly available (accession DRR214959- DRR2149562 in NCBI BioProject PRJDB9452) and were downloaded and used in the present study. Therefore, 1 mL of unstimulated saliva was additionally collected and stored from a healthy volunteer. The healthy volunteers were 2 men and 3 women aged 35-to-65 years.
The saliva samples stored in the kit were subjected to DNA extraction using an enzymatic method [21]. The extracted DNA samples were stored in 50 μL pure water and used for Nextera XT library construction. The libraries were mixed and subjected to two multiplex genome sequencing runs with the Illumina HiSeq 2 × 150 bp paired-end run protocol. The amount of raw sequence data was 49.3, 128.6, 14.8, 16.4, 34.2 Gb for the 5 MRONJ patients, and 11.7 Gb for the healthy control. The publicly available metagenome data are > 30 Gb for each of the 4 healthy controls.
The sequence data after the preprocessing described below and removal of human reads of the healthy control (BioProject PRJDB10432) and those of the patients (BioProject PRJDB10606) are publicly available.
Preprocessing, taxonomic profiling, assembly, and gene-by-gene analyses
EDGE pipeline version 1.5 [22] was used for preprocessing (trimming or filtering out reads, and removal of reads mapped to the human genome) of the HiSeq data. Reads of 0.15–2.51% reads were discarded, and 0.70–4.86% of bases were trimmed in the initial quality control. Then, 0.06–2.78% of the filtered reads that mapped to the human genome were removed. Taxonomic profiling was conducted using Kraken [23] and its full database (created in March 2017 according to https://github.com/mw55309/Kraken_db_install_scripts) implemented in metaWRAP [24] as a module can directly subsample the same number (approximately 37 million) of read pairs in each sample. The preprocessing of the sequencing data and taxonomic profiling were also performed for the five additional MRONJ samples in an extended dataset explained in the next section.
HiSeq reads were assembled using SPAdes [25] with the “—meta” option. We then predicted the protein-coding genes for every contig using Prokka [26], and constructed a gene presence or absence matrix for the entire set of genes (i.e., orthologous clusters) detected among the case and control samples using the Roary pipeline [27] with the “-i 90—group_limit 1000000” option. For each gene found to be specific to MRONJ samples, gene function annotation was performed by searching the database of hidden Markov models profiles of orthologous genes defined in the KEGG database using KofamScan [28].
Mapping reads to the extended dataset and estimation of their abundance
The MRONJ sample-specific genes were further examined in an extended dataset of five additional MRONJ patients (5 females; aged 44–87 years) and publicly available salivary metagenome data of nine healthy controls (all seven datasets of the Human Microbiome Project (https://www.hmpdacc.org/HMIWGS/healthy) along with two Japanese datasets (accession numbers: DRR046069 and DRR046087) [29]). Saliva collection, DNA extraction, and library construction were conducted for the five additional MRONJ patients using the same protocol as above. The libraries were separately subjected to genome sequencing with the Illumina HiSeq 2 × 150 bp paired-end run protocol. The size of the raw sequence data was 35.8, 32.0, 31.2, 31.2, 33.1 Gb for the five additional MRONJ samples. The sequencing reads of each sample were mapped to the nucleotide sequences of the genes identified above using KMA (k-mer alignment) [30]. The nucleotide sequences of the genes of the 1st MRONJ patient were used as templates. The presence of genes was determined based on the following criteria: > 90% nucleotide sequence identity between the reads and the template gene sequence, and reads covering > 80% of the length of the template sequence.
Aligned nucleotide sequences of the genes exhibiting > 80% increase in frequency in MRONJ samples compared to their frequency in the healthy controls in the extended dataset were extracted from the KMA output file. The relative abundance of each gene in each sample was calculated as transcripts (reads) per million (TPM) [31] using CoverM (https://github.com/wwood/CoverM), based on the mapping of HiSeq reads with the extracted nucleotide sequence of each MRONJ sample. The TPM values could be directly compared among the samples because the sum of the values was normalized to 1 million [31].
Taxonomic analysis of contigs and genes associated with MRONJ
The Contig Annotation Tool (CAT) [32] was applied for taxonomic classification of the contigs based on amino acid sequence searching of each ORF against the NCBI nr database followed by a voting approach by summing all scores from ORFs separately supporting a certain taxonomic classification (superkingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species) and checking if the summation exceeded a cutoff value (by default, 0.5 × summed scores) supporting a superkingdom of the certain taxonomic classification across ORFs, representing a balance between the classification precision and a fraction of the classified sequences.
The presence or absence of each gene associated with MRONJ and encoded in a contig assigned to Actinomyces was checked among publicly available genome sequences of Actinomyces spp. strains. We also constructed a core genome alignment of the Actinomyces species using the Roary pipeline with the “-i 80” option accounting for high genetic diversity among the species. We then constructed a maximum-likelihood tree using PhyML [33] from the alignment. The presence of MRONJ-associated genes for each strain were defined according to the criterion of >90% nucleotide sequence identity over > 80% of the locus length, and were illustrated as a heatmap using Phandango [34].
Phylogenetic distribution of the MRONJ-associated genes outside Actinomyces was examined using BLASTN searches against the KEGG GENOME database. The results were tabulated using an in-house Perl script with a cutoff of e-value 1e-90 indicative of gene presence. For genera including at least an MRONJ-associated gene, we extracted nucleotide sequences of 16S rRNA from representative strains registered in the Microbial Genome Database for Comparative Analysis (MBGD) or NCBI Genbank. The nucleotide sequences were aligned using MAFFT. Similarly, a maximum-likelihood tree was constructed using PhyML from the alignment. The presence or absence of the MRONJ-associated genes for each genus were illustrated as a heatmap using Phandango.
Ethical considerations
This study was approved by the ethics committees of the Research Institute National Center for Global Health and Medicine (approval number NCGM-G-0002529-02), National Institute of Infectious Diseases (811), Fukuoka Dental University (368). Written informed consent was obtained from the participants of the study.
Results
Taxonomic profiling identifies microbes associated with MRONJ
Taxonomic profiling (i.e., computational inference of taxonomic clades populating a given microbial community and their proportions; relative abundance) using the deep shotgun metagenome data (>10 Gb per sample) revealed an average 24.8% increase in Actinobacteria phylum among the five MRONJ patients compared to the five healthy controls (Fig 1). A 33.2% decrease in Streptococcus genus normally predominant in the human oral microbiota was evident in MRONJ patients (Fig 1). Among Actinobacteria, genus Actinomyces increased 10.1% on average. No other genus displayed >10% increased/decreased abundance in MRONJ patients. The average relative abundance of Actinomyces among the five MRONJ patients was 14.0%, which was almost the same (14.4%) among five more MRONJ patients in the extended dataset used in the next section.
MRONJ-associated genes encoded in Actinomyces genomic regions
A gene presence or absence matrix was created by assembling the metagenomic reads, and gene finding and analysis of the pan-genome (i.e., the entire repertoire of genes encoded in the assembled contig sequences) among the five MRONJ patients compared to the five healthy controls, which revealed 191 genes present in all MRONJ samples and absent in any healthy control sample. Further analysis of the reads mapped to the genes in the extended dataset comprising five additional MRONJ samples and the publicly available salivary metagenome dataset of nine healthy controls resulted in the identification of 31 genes, which were present in 90% of the MRONJ samples (i.e., present in 9 out of the 5 plus 5 samples) and 0 or 7% of the healthy control samples (i.e., present in 0 or 1 sample out of the 5 plus 9 samples) (p < 0.005 after Bonferroni correction, Fisher’s exact test). Nucleotide sequences of the 31 genes are available at https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Nucleotide_sequence_of_MRONJ-associated_31_genes/13023143.
Taxonomic classification of assembled contigs encoding the 31 genes based on an amino acid sequence search of each open reading frame (ORF) against the NCBI nr database followed by summation of all scores from the ORFs revealed that they were all assigned to genus Actinomyces.
The abundance of each of the 31 genes (S1 Table) plotted for each pair of the 10 MRONJ patients is shown in Fig 2A. The Spearman’s correlation coefficient between gene abundance was higher than 0.3 among 84% of the paired MRONJ samples. When the 31 genes were ranked based on the sum of TPM values in 10 patients, the top two genes were gcpE (encoding (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl-diphosphate synthase) and dps (encoding starvation-inducible DNA-binding protein) (Fig 2B).
Phylogenetic distribution of MRONJ-associated genes
A core genome phylogenetic tree in the Actinomyces genus was constructed for 51 strains registered in the public databases (S2 Table), together with information of the presence or absence of the 31 MRONJ-associated genes in each strain (Fig 3). Concerning the distribution of the 31 MRONJ-associated genes, strains harboring the top 2 most abundant genes, gcpE and dps, were exclusively found in a sub-clade (red circle in Fig 3) with 100% bootstrap support (pink branch in Fig 3). The sub-clade included an Actinomyces gerencseriae strain and two Actinomyces massiliensis strains, as well as an Actinomyces strain that did not have a species name. The two species were confined to this sub-clade in the whole Actinomyces phylogeny.
To explore the phylogenetic distribution of the top 2 genes except Actinomyces, a BLASTn search was performed against the entire Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomics (KEGG) database. The genes were all present only in genus Actinomyces (Fig 4, red arrow), as shown in the tree constructed using 16S rRNA gene sequences among various genera (Fig 4 and S3 Table). E-values of the BLASTn searches as well as abundance of each genus in oral microbiota of each sample calculated from the taxonomic profiling are shown in S3 Table. gcpE was detected only in Actinomyces and Schaalia, and dps only in Actinomyces and Propionibacterium. Compared to Actinomyces with on average 5.3% abundance across the 5 healthy control samples, Schaalia and Propionibacterium were not usual members of human oral microbiome because their abundances were always zero or < 0.5% (S3 Table).
Discussion
Actinomyces was increased by an average of 10.1% in MRONJ patients when compared to healthy controls. The result was consistent with a previous study [14] indicating that Actinomyces is dominant in oral microbiome of MRONJ patients. The present approach was more quantitative due to the shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Gene-level analyses identified 31 MRONJ-associated genes. All were encoded by Actinomyces genomic regions. Among them, the top 2 most abundant genes were gcpE and dps that were all present only in the sub-clade of Actinomyces. Their hypothetical relationships with the disease at the molecular level based on literature data is depicted in Fig 5.
gcpE encodes an iron-sulfur enzyme, which synthesizes (E)‐4‐hydroxy‐3‐methylbutyl‐2‐enyl pyrophosphate (HMBPP). GcpE is inactivated by dioxygen [35]. It could be activated and decreased in the blood by using drugs via reduction of bone resorption or inhibition of angiogenesis [36]. The activation of gcpE increases the synthesis of HMBPP, which is a potent activator of human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells (a major subpopulation of γδ T cells). The effect of HMBPP on human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells stimulation is 104-fold greater (large red arrow in Fig 5 than isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) [37] that accumulates when nitrogen-containing BPs are used (“increased IPP” to the left of gcpE in Fig 5). Vγ9Vδ2 T cells have pronounced cell lytic activity. This induces target cell apoptosis and secretion of cytotoxic substances, which are active against both the infected host cells as well as pathogens [38]. Activated γδ T cells also produce inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interferon-gamma that are detected in MRONJ lesions compared to control in vitro [39]. This strong local inflammation could contribute to osteonecrosis in MRONJ [40], consistent with a previous study that reported osteonecrosis in infectious osteomyelitis in mice [40].
dps encodes a dodecameric (12-mer) bacterial ferritin that protects DNA from oxidative stress and has been implicated in bacterial survival and virulence [41]. The γδ T cells activated by HMBPP and IPP produce inflammatory cytokines, which activate macrophages that produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) through NADPH oxidase and nitric oxide (NO) through inducible nitric synthase (iNOS) in response to bacterial infection [42, 43]. ROS and NO are capable of damaging DNA, proteins, and other cellular compartments including those of bacteria. iNOS is also up-regulated by activation of macrophages by ɤδ T cells. iNOS is also involved in the process of wound healing [44], likely including surgical invasion, such as extraction of teeth.
In summary, by conducting taxonomic profiling and gene-level analyses in the oral microbiota, we identified the 2 key genes almost specific to MRONJ and encoded by Actinomyces. Because the sample size used in this study was small, these preliminary data require further verification. The findings of this study can, however, aid future studies to verify the data and understand the disease mechanisms, develop molecular targeted drugs, and be useful for early stage screening and prognosis prediction.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
The computational calculations were done at the Human Genome Center at the Institute of Medical Science (University of Tokyo) and at the National Institute of Genetics. We are grateful to Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.
Data Availability
The sequence data after the preprocessing described below and removal of human reads of the healthy control (BioProject PRJDB10432) and those of the patients (BioProject PRJDB10606) are publicly available.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research of Education, Culture, Science, Sports, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan (19H04846 to K.Y., 19J40070 to H.Y. and 16H06429, 16K21723), and in part by Grants-in-Aid for Research from the National Center for Global Health and Medicine (20A-3002 to H.Y.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Russell RG. Bisphosphonates: the first 40 years. Bone. 2011;49(1):2–19. 10.1016/j.bone.2011.04.022 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Marx RE. Pamidronate (Aredia) and zoledronate (Zometa) induced avascular necrosis of the jaws: a growing epidemic. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61(9):1115–7. 10.1016/s0278-2391(03)00720-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hellstein JW, Adler RA, Edwards B, Jacobsen PL, Kalmar JR, Koka S, et al. Managing the care of patients receiving antiresorptive therapy for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis: executive summary of recommendations from the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142(11):1243–51. 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0108 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Fantasia J, Goodday R, Aghaloo T, Mehrotra B, et al. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons position paper on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw—2014 update. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72(10):1938–56. 10.1016/j.joms.2014.04.031 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nicolatou-Galitis O, Kouri M, Papadopoulou E, Vardas E, Galiti D, Epstein JB, et al. Osteonecrosis of the jaw related to non-antiresorptive medications: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(2):383–94. 10.1007/s00520-018-4501-x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lombard T, Neirinckx V, Rogister B, Gilon Y, Wislet S. Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: New Insights into Molecular Mechanisms and Cellular Therapeutic Approaches. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:8768162 10.1155/2016/8768162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yarom N, Shapiro CL, Peterson DE, Van Poznak CH, Bohlke K, Ruggiero SL, et al. Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: MASCC/ISOO/ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(25):2270–90. 10.1200/JCO.19.01186 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Khan AA, Morrison A, Hanley DA, Felsenberg D, McCauley LK, O'Ryan F, et al. Diagnosis and management of osteonecrosis of the jaw: a systematic review and international consensus. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30(1):3–23. 10.1002/jbmr.2405 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shibahara T, Morikawa T, Yago K, Kishimoto H, Imai Y, Kurita K. National Survey on Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws in Japan. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76(10):2105–12. 10.1016/j.joms.2018.04.009 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Filleul O, Crompot E, Saussez S. Bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw: a review of 2,400 patient cases. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010;136(8):1117–24. 10.1007/s00432-010-0907-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vahtsevanos K, Kyrgidis A, Verrou E, Katodritou E, Triaridis S, Andreadis CG, et al. Longitudinal cohort study of risk factors in cancer patients of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(32):5356–62. 10.1200/JCO.2009.21.9584 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Saad F, Brown JE, Van Poznak C, Ibrahim T, Stemmer SM, Stopeck AT, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of osteonecrosis of the jaw: integrated analysis from three blinded active-controlled phase III trials in cancer patients with bone metastases. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(5):1341–7. 10.1093/annonc/mdr435 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lesclous P, Abi Najm S, Carrel JP, Baroukh B, Lombardi T, Willi JP, et al. Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw: a key role of inflammation? Bone. 2009;45(5):843–52. 10.1016/j.bone.2009.07.011 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cerrato A, Zanette G, Boccuto M, Angelini A, Valente M, Bacci C. Actinomyces and MRONJ: A retrospective study and a literature review. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020. 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.07.012 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Boff RC, Salum FG, Figueiredo MA, Cherubini K. Important aspects regarding the role of microorganisms in bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. Arch Oral Biol. 2014;59(8):790–9. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2014.05.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sedghizadeh PP, Yooseph S, Fadrosh DW, Zeigler-Allen L, Thiagarajan M, Salek H, et al. Metagenomic investigation of microbes and viruses in patients with jaw osteonecrosis associated with bisphosphonate therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;114(6):764–70. 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.08.444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vartoukian SR, Adamowska A, Lawlor M, Moazzez R, Dewhirst FE, Wade WG. In Vitro Cultivation of 'Unculturable' Oral Bacteria, Facilitated by Community Culture and Media Supplementation with Siderophores. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0146926 10.1371/journal.pone.0146926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yoneda T, Hagino H, Sugimoto T, Ohta H, Takahashi S, Soen S, et al. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: position paper from the Allied Task Force Committee of Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research, Japan Osteoporosis Society, Japanese Society of Periodontology, Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, and Japanese Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. J Bone Miner Metab. 2010;28(4):365–83. 10.1007/s00774-010-0162-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Belstrom D, Holmstrup P, Bardow A, Kokaras A, Fiehn NE, Paster BJ. Temporal Stability of the Salivary Microbiota in Oral Health. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0147472 10.1371/journal.pone.0147472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jo R, Nishimoto Y, Umezawa K, Yama K, Aita Y, Ichiba Y, et al. Comparison of oral microbiome profiles in stimulated and unstimulated saliva, tongue, and mouth-rinsed water. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):16124 10.1038/s41598-019-52445-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Said HS, Suda W, Nakagome S, Chinen H, Oshima K, Kim S, et al. Dysbiosis of salivary microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease and its association with oral immunological biomarkers. DNA Res. 2014;21(1):15–25. 10.1093/dnares/dst037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li PE, Lo CC, Anderson JJ, Davenport KW, Bishop-Lilly KA, Xu Y, et al. Enabling the democratization of the genomics revolution with a fully integrated web-based bioinformatics platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(1):67–80. 10.1093/nar/gkw1027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wood DE, Salzberg SL. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 2014;15(3):R46 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Uritskiy GV, DiRuggiero J, Taylor J. MetaWRAP-a flexible pipeline for genome-resolved metagenomic data analysis. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):158 10.1186/s40168-018-0541-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 2017;27(5):824–34. 10.1101/gr.213959.116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(14):2068–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MT, et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(22):3691–3. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Aramaki T, Blanc-Mathieu R, Endo H, Ohkubo K, Kanehisa M, Goto S, et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG Ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(7):2251–2. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Takayasu L, Suda W, Takanashi K, Iioka E, Kurokawa R, Shindo C, et al. Circadian oscillations of microbial and functional composition in the human salivary microbiome. DNA Res. 2017;24(3):261–70. 10.1093/dnares/dsx001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Clausen P, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. Rapid and precise alignment of raw reads against redundant databases with KMA. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018;19(1):307 10.1186/s12859-018-2336-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wagner GP, Kin K, Lynch VJ. Measurement of mRNA abundance using RNA-seq data: RPKM measure is inconsistent among samples. Theory Biosci. 2012;131(4):281–5. 10.1007/s12064-012-0162-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.von Meijenfeldt FAB, Arkhipova K, Cambuy DD, Coutinho FH, Dutilh BE. Robust taxonomic classification of uncharted microbial sequences and bins with CAT and BAT. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):217 10.1186/s13059-019-1817-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 2010;59(3):307–21. 10.1093/sysbio/syq010 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hadfield J, Croucher NJ, Goater RJ, Abudahab K, Aanensen DM, Harris SR. Phandango: an interactive viewer for bacterial population genomics. bioRxiv. 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kollas AK, Duin EC, Eberl M, Altincicek B, Hintz M, Reichenberg A, et al. Functional characterization of GcpE, an essential enzyme of the non-mevalonate pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis. FEBS Lett. 2002;532(3):432–6. 10.1016/s0014-5793(02)03725-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chang J, Hakam AE, McCauley LK. Current Understanding of the Pathophysiology of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2018;16(5):584–95. 10.1007/s11914-018-0474-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hintz M, Reichenberg A, Altincicek B, Bahr U, Gschwind RM, Kollas AK, et al. Identification of (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enyl pyrophosphate as a major activator for human gammadelta T cells in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 2001;509(2):317–22. 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)03191-x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nedellec S, Bonneville M, Scotet E. Human Vgamma9Vdelta2 T cells: from signals to functions. Semin Immunol. 2010;22(4):199–206. 10.1016/j.smim.2010.04.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Movila A, Mawardi H, Nishimura K, Kiyama T, Egashira K, Kim JY, et al. Possible pathogenic engagement of soluble Semaphorin 4D produced by gammadeltaT cells in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;480(1):42–7. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.10.012 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Morita M, Iwasaki R, Sato Y, Kobayashi T, Watanabe R, Oike T, et al. Elevation of pro-inflammatory cytokine levels following anti-resorptive drug treatment is required for osteonecrosis development in infectious osteomyelitis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:46322 10.1038/srep46322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Janissen R, Arens MMA, Vtyurina NN, Rivai Z, Sunday ND, Eslami-Mossallam B, et al. Global DNA Compaction in Stationary-Phase Bacteria Does Not Affect Transcription. Cell. 2018;174(5):1188–99 e14. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Castaneda OA, Lee SC, Ho CT, Huang TC. Macrophages in oxidative stress and models to evaluate the antioxidant function of dietary natural compounds. J Food Drug Anal. 2017;25(1):111–8. 10.1016/j.jfda.2016.11.006 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jones-Carson J, Vazquez-Torres A, van der Heyde HC, Warner T, Wagner RD, Balish E. Gamma delta T cell-induced nitric oxide production enhances resistance to mucosal candidiasis. Nat Med. 1995;1(6):552–7. 10.1038/nm0695-552 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Oppeltz RF, Rani M, Zhang Q, Schwacha MG. Gamma delta (gammadelta) T-cells are critical in the up-regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase at the burn wound site. Cytokine. 2012;60(2):528–34. 10.1016/j.cyto.2012.07.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]