Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0242349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242349

Component of nicotine-induced intracellular calcium elevation mediated through α3- and α5-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are regulated by cyclic AMP in SH-SY 5Y cells

Tamayo Takahashi 1,2, Takayuki Yoshida 3, Kana Harada 1, Tatsuhiko Miyagi 1, Kouichi Hashimoto 3, Izumi Hide 1, Shigeru Tanaka 1, Masahiro Irifune 2, Norio Sakai 1,*
Editor: Nirakar Sahoo4
PMCID: PMC7703979  PMID: 33253222

Abstract

The pathway from the medial habenular nucleus to the interpeduncular nucleus, in which nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) including the α3 and α5 subunits (α3 * and α5 * nAChRs) are expressed, is implicated in nicotine dependence. We investigated whether α3 * and α5 * nAChRs are regulated by cAMP using SH-SY5Y cells to clarify the significance of these receptors in nicotine dependence. We analyzed the nicotine-induced elevation of intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i). Nicotine induces a concentration-dependent increase in [Ca2+]i. The elimination of Ca2+ from extracellular fluid or intracellular stores demonstrated that the nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation was due to extracellular influx and intracellular mobilization. The effects of tubocurarine on nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation and current suggest that intracellular mobilization is caused by plasma membrane-permeating nicotine. The inhibition of α3 *, α5 *, α7 nAChR and voltage-gated Ca2+ channels by using siRNAs and selective antagonists revealed the involvement of these nAChR subunits and channels in nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation. To distinguish and characterize the α3 * and α5 * nAChR-mediated Ca2+ influx, we measured the [Ca2+]i elevation induced by nonmembrane-permeating acetylcholine when muscarinic receptors, α7nAChR and Ca2+ channels were blocked. Under this condition, the [Ca2+]i elevation was significantly inhibited with a 48-h treatment of dibutyryl cAMP, which was accompanied by the downregulation of α3 and β4 mRNA. These findings suggest that α3 * and α5 * nAChR-mediated Ca2+ influx is possibly regulated by cAMP at the transcriptional level.

Introduction

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are pentameric ion channel-containing receptors composed of α, β, γ, and δ subunits. In the central nervous system (CNS), they are composed of α2–4 and β2–10 subunits and are homopentamers composed of a single subunit or heteropentamers composed of different subunits [1]. Binding of ligands such as acetylcholine and nicotine to nAChR causes the influx of cations such as Na+ and Ca2+. The influx of Ca2+ triggers a variety of intracellular signaling events and the release of neurotransmitters from nerve terminals [1, 2]. Nicotinic receptors in the CNS have been implicated in the regulation of pain [35] and in the formation of nicotine dependence [6, 7].

The dopaminergic nervous system between the ventral tegmental area and the nucleus accumbens is known as a neural pathway that forms drug dependence, including nicotine dependence [6]. When nicotine enters the brain, it binds to nAChRs on dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area and is thought to activate the brain reward system by releasing dopamine [8]. The medial habenular nucleus projects to the interpeduncular nucleus and is thought to indirectly control dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area [9]. It has been reported that nicotinic receptors containing the α5 subunit (α5 * nAChRs), which are expressed in this neuronal pathway [10], regulate the aversion response to high concentrations of nicotine, suggesting that α5 * nAChR is a target of nicotine dependence [11]. In addition to α5 * nAChRs, α3 * nAChRs are widely expressed in the habenular nucleus [12], implicating these nAChRs in nicotine dependence; however, the regulatory mechanism of these receptors has not been fully elucidated because of the lack of selective agonists and antagonists for universal use.

GPR3, a G protein-coupled receptor that is constitutively associated with Gs (stimulatory G protein) and maintains intracellular cAMP levels, is abundantly expressed in the CNS [13]. In the mouse brain, GPR3 is expressed predominantly in the medial habenular nucleus and hippocampus [14]. GPR3 has been reported to be an important factor in neurite outgrowth, survival, differentiation, and polarization [13, 15, 16].

Although the physiological significance of GPR3 expression in the medial habenular nucleus has not yet been elucidated, it has been reported that cAMP-PKA signaling regulates signal transduction through α3 * nAChRs [17, 18]. This signaling leads to the possibility that α3 * nAChR may be regulated by cAMP, the level of which is increased via GPR3, and this mechanism may be involved in nicotine dependence. In this study, we focused on nicotine-induced intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) elevation because both α3 * and α5 * nAChRs have calcium ion permeability [19, 20]. To elucidate whether α3 * and α5 *nAChRs are regulated by cAMP, we sought to clarify the basic properties of α3 * and α5 * nAChR-mediated [Ca2+]i elevation and the cAMP-mediated regulation of these nAChRs using SHSY-5Y cells, in which both α3 * and α5 * nAChRs were endogenously expressed [14, 21].

Materials and methods

Materials

Nicotine was purchased from Nacalai Tesque (Kyoto, Japan). Thapsigargin and ionomycin were purchased from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. Fluo-4-AM and PowerLoad concentrate were purchased from Molecular Probe (Eugene, OR, USA). Acetylcholine, d-tubocurarine, nifedipine and dibutyryl cyclic AMP were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Omega-conotoxin GVIA and α-conotoxin AuIB were from the Peptide Institute, Inc. (Osaka, Japan). Atropine was obtained from Katayma Chemical Industries Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). All the other chemicals used were of analytical grade.

Cell culture and transfection

SH-SY5Y cells were purchased from the Riken Cell Bank (Tsukuba, Japan) and were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium/Ham’s F-12 medium (FUJIFILM Wako, Osaka, Japan) containing 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 units/ml), and streptomycin (100 μg/ml). To obtain fluorescence images, cultured cells were seeded onto glass-bottom culture dishes (MatTek Corporation, Ashland, OR, USA).

RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from subconfluent SH-SY 5Y cells using an RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and converted into first-strand cDNA using the QuantiTect reverse transcription kit (Qiagen). Real-time PCR was performed using SYBR Green Real-time PCR Master Mix and an ABI Prism model 7500 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City CA, USA). mRNA level was normalized to that of GAPDH mRNA. The relative expression was calculated using the ΔCT method. The primer set used to detect human α3nAChR subunit was 5’-GCTTGTAGTCATTCCAGATTTGC-3’ and 5’-ACCCAGTCATCATCCATTTCG-3’. The primer set used to detect human α5nAChR subunit was 5’-CATCTATCCATTCCTGTTTCAACC-3’ and 5’-CCTGTGGAACACCTGAATGAC-3’. The primer set used to detect human β4nAChR subunit was 5’-GTCCATTCCTGTTTCAGCCA-3’ and 5’-CTCACAGCTCATCTCCATCAAG-3’.

The primer set used to detect human GAPDH mRNA, an internal control, was 5’-TGTAGTTGAGGTCAATGAAGGG-3’ and 5’-ACATCGCTCAGACACCATG-3’. R-squared values of the PCR were 0.9997, 0.9999, 0.9996, 1, 0.9998, 1 for PCRs of α3, α5, α7, β2, β4 and GAPDH, respectively. The amplification efficiencies of the primers used to detect nAChRs mRNA in this study were almost 100% without exception.

Loading of Fluo-4 and observed increases in intracellular calcium

The culture medium of the cells was replaced with normal HEPES buffer composed of 165 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM HEPES, and 10 mM glucose at pH 7.4. To eliminate the extracellular Ca2+, 1 mM CaCl2 was replaced with 2.5 mM EGTA. Then, the calcium indicator Fluo-4 (2.5 μM) and PowerLoad concentrate (diluted to 1:100) were loaded into cells 30 min prior to observation. To observe nicotine- or acetylcholine-triggered calcium elevation, time-lapse imaging was carried out using a fluorescence microscope (Keyence, BZ-9000) every 15 seconds for 15 min after the application of nicotine or acetylcholine. To observe the effects of drugs on Ca2+ elevation, cells were pretreated for 15 min before nicotine or acetylcholine was applied.

Semiquantitative evaluation of nicotine-induced increases in intracellular calcium

We selected between 8 and 10 regions of interest (ROIs) and determined the average fluorescence change in these regions. The time-dependent change in intracellular calcium ion [Ca2+]i was determined by setting the fluorescence intensity to 100% before administration of nicotine or acetylcholine (Fig 1B). At the end of each trial, ionomycin was administered at a final concentration of 0.5 μM to confirm the loading state of Fluo-4 AM. The increase in [Ca2+]i in each study was quantified as a ratio of the peak increase in [Ca2+]i induced by nicotine to that induced by ionomycin, according to the modified methods in a previous report [2].

Fig 1.

Fig 1

(A) Expression of the mRNAs of the nicotinic receptor subunits in SH-SY5Y cells. The type of nicotinic receptor expressed in SH-SY5Y cells was examined by real-time PCR. The expression of mRNA for the α3, α5, α7, β2, and β4 nicotinic receptor subunits were confirmed. Data represent the mean ± standard error of 3 independent experiments. (B) Nicotine-induced intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) elevation in SH-SY5Y cells. Left panel: The [Ca2+]i increase induced by nicotine was observed for 15 min, and ionomycin was administered at the end of observation. The fluorescence before nicotine administration was assumed to be 100%, and the change in [Ca2+]i after application of nicotine at each concentration is shown. Data represent the average of the experiments shown in right panel. Right panel: The ratio of peak [Ca2+]i elevation induced by nicotine to the [Ca2+]i elevation induced by ionomycin was evaluated as an index of nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation. A concentration-dependent nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i increase was observed. The data represent the means ± standard error.

Transfection of siRNA and an expression plasmid for delivering GPR3 into SHSY-5Y cells

For transfection of siRNAs for nAChR and GPR3, Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MI, USA) was used according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. An expression plasmid for DsRed was also cotransfected to detect the siRNA-transfected cells. Double-stranded siRNAs corresponding to human GPR3 were purchased from Life Technologies Japan (Tokyo, Japan). The target siRNA sequence was 5’-CUACUAUUCAGAGACAACAtt-3. The RNA sequence for the control siRNA was 5’-UACUAUUCGACACGCGAAGdTdT-3’. Small interfering RNAs targeting human α3, α5, α7, β2 and β4 nAChR subunits were purchased from Applied Biosystems (Waltham, MA, USA).

Measurement of nicotine-induced current

Whole-cell recordings were made from the SH-SY5Y cells, and ionic currents were recorded in the voltage-clamp mode at -70 or -60 mV with an Axopatch 200B (Molecular Device, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The signals were filtered at 3 kHz and digitized at 20 kHz. On-line data acquisition and off-line data analysis were performed using pClamp and Clampex software (v10.7, Molecular Device), respectively. Nicotine and tubocurarine were bath-applied, and leak currents were sampled every five seconds. The intracellular solution consisted of CsCl, 5 mM; Cs D-gluconate, 125 mM; NaCl, 10 mM; HEPES, 10 mM; EGTA, 10 mM; Mg-ATP, 4 mM; and (2 Na) -GTP, 0.4 mM. The external solution consisted of 125 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgSO4, 1.25 mM NaH2PO4, 26 mM NaHCO3, and 20 mM glucose.

Statistical analysis

Statistics were determined using Prism 4 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Statistical significance was determined by unpaired t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s posttest. If the p value was less than 0.05 (p<0.05), the difference was considered significant.

Results

Expression of various nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) mRNAs in SH-SY5Y cells

Previous reports have shown that SH-SY5Y cells endogenously express the mRNAs for the α3, α5, α7, β2, and β4 nAChR subunits [22]. As shown in Fig 1A, our present study confirmed the presence of these mRNAs as previously reported. The mRNA levels for the α3, α5 and β4 nAChR subunits were more prominent than those for the α7 or β2 nAChR subunits.

Fundamental properties of nicotine-induced intracellular Ca2+ elevation in SH-SY5Y cells

Nicotine-induced elevation of intracellular Ca2+ in SH-SY5Y cells

We investigated the [Ca2+]i elevation in SH-SY5Y cells after nicotine administration. As shown in Fig 1B, a concentration-dependent increase in [Ca2+]i was observed when nicotine at concentrations between 100 μM and 500 μM was administered.

Investigation of the origin of Ca2+ in nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation

We examined the origin of Ca2+ involved in the nicotine-induced intracellular [Ca2+]i elevation observed in SH-SY5Y cells. First, we examined whether nicotine (500 μM)-induced intracellular [Ca2+]i elevation occurs when extracellular Ca2+ was eliminated. As indicated by the light blue line in Fig 2A, the elimination of extracellular Ca2+ did not remarkably affect the nicotine-induced intracellular [Ca2+]i elevation, suggesting that nicotine-induced intracellular [Ca2+]i elevation may also be critical for intracellular Ca2+ mobilization.

Fig 2. The origin of the Ca2+ involved in the nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation in SH-SY5Y cells.

Fig 2

(A) Effect of eliminating extracellular Ca2+. A Ca2+-free buffer in which calcium was replaced by EGTA was used. The [Ca2+]i elevation after 500 μM nicotine treatment was observed when extracellular Ca2+ was eliminated. (B) In the presence of extracellular Ca2+, 5 μM thapsigargin was incubated for 15 min to deplete the intracellular Ca2+ stores. Then, 500 μM nicotine was applied. The [Ca2+]i elevation, which is thought to be the result of extracellular influx, was observed (purple line). [Ca2+]i elevation was also observed when nicotine was administered without thapsigargin (black line). (C) In the presence of the Ca2+ -free buffer, thapsigargin was incubated for 15 min to eliminate intracellular and extracellular Ca2+. The subsequent application of nicotine did not induce [Ca2+]i increases (purple line). The [Ca2+]i elevation was observed when nicotine was administered without thapsigargin, which is thought to mobilize Ca2+ from intracellular organelles (black line). A representative example of more than 5 cases is shown in Fig 2A–2C.

To confirm this finding, we used thapsigargin (5 μM), an endoplasmic reticulum calcium pump inhibitor. As shown in the purple line in Fig 2B, increases in intracellular [Ca2+]i levels were observed when thapsigargin was administered in the presence of extracellular Ca2+. In this state, when intracellular Ca2+ stores were depleted, nicotine (500 μM) induced an increase in [Ca2+]i, which is thought to be the result of extracellular Ca2+ influx. The black line indicates that a nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation was also observed when the buffer was administered alone as a vehicle. Then, as indicated by the purple line in Fig 2C, Ca2+-free buffer was used to eliminate the extracellular Ca2+, and thapsigargin (5 μM) was administered to deplete the intracellular Ca2+ stores. Depletion of intracellular and extracellular Ca2+ completely abolished the nicotine (500 μM)-induced [Ca2+]i increase (Fig 2C, purple line). When a Ca2+-free buffer was administered alone as a vehicle, nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation was observed, which may have been the result of intracellular Ca2+ mobilization (Fig 2C, black line). Taken together, these results suggest that there are two processes of nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation: extracellular influx and intracellular mobilization.

Effects of nonselective nicotinic receptor antagonists on nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation and nicotine-induced current

To elucidate whether nicotine-induced intracellular [Ca2+]i elevation was mediated by nAChRs, we examined the effects of the nonselective nAChR antagonist tubocurarine. We first examined effects of tubocurarine on nicotine-induced currents using whole-cell recording. As shown in Fig 3A, inward currents induced by bath application of 500 μM nicotine were almost completely inhibited by pretreatment with 100 μM tubocurarine. Tubocurarine (100 μM) also completely inhibited the nicotine (250 μM)-induced current (S1 Fig). In quantitative analysis, 100 μM tubocurarine significantly and robustly inhibited nicotine (500 μM)-induced currents (Fig 3B). The nicotine (500 μM)-induced currents in the presence of tubocurarine were not significantly different from currents in the presence of tubocurarine alone (Fig 3B). These results suggest that the nicotine-induced current is largely mediated by nAChRs.

Fig 3. Effects of tubocurarine, a nonselective nAChR antagonist, on nicotine-induced intracellular [Ca2+]i elevation and current.

Fig 3

(A) The representative time plot of leak currents at -70 or -60 mV. Leak currents were sampled every ten seconds. Left panel: The bath application of nicotine (500 μM) evoked the large inward current in a SH-SY5Y cell. Nicotine was applied during a period indicated by a black line. Right panel: Pretreatment with 100 μM tubocurarine (white line) completely suppressed the nicotine-induced current. Representative examples from 8 independent experiments are presented. (B) Quantitative analysis of the effects of tubocurarine on nicotine (500 μM)-induced currents. The average of three consecutive data just prior to drug administration was set at 100% and the inward current under each condition was normalized. Abbreviations, nic and tub, indicate nicotine and tubocurarine, respectively. **p<0.01, ns p>0.05, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s posttest, n = 8. (C) Left panel: We investigated the temporal changes in nicotine (250 μM)-induced [Ca2+]i elevation following 15 min of pretreatment with the nonselective nAChR antagonist tubocurarine (100 μM). Black line: 250 μM nicotine alone, Blue line: 15 min pretreatment with 100 μM tubocurarine. Data represent the average of the six experiments shown in right panel. Right panel: Ca2+ increases in the 250 μM nicotine alone-treated group and the 15 min pretreatment with 100 μM tubocurarine groups are shown. Data indicate the means ± standard error. * p < 0.05, unpaired t-test vs the nicotine-alone-treated group.

Next we examined effects of tubocurarine on the nicotine (250 μM)-induced [Ca2+]i elevation. As shown in Fig 3C, tubocurarine significantly suppressed nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation, which suggests that [Ca2+]i elevation is largely mediated by nAChRs expressed in plasma membrane. Unexpectedly, the small, but apparent [Ca2+]i elevation was still remained in the presence of tubocurarine (Fig 3C). Because nicotine is known to be membrane–permeable [23], penetrated nicotine might induce intracellular calcium mobilization by unknown mechanism. These findings also support the idea that a component in the intracellular calcium mobilization process contributes to nicotine-induced [Ca2 +]i elevation.

Involvement of nAChRs in nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation

As shown in Fig 1, the results indicate that SH-SY5Y cells expressed α3, α5, α7, β2 and β4 nAChR subunits. Therefore, the involvement of each subunit in nicotine-induced calcium elevation was elucidated using siRNA for each subunit or specific nAChR inhibitors. As shown in Fig 4A, the siRNA for the β4 nAChR subunit significantly reduced the nicotine (250 μM)-induced [Ca2+]i elevation compared with the control in siRNA-transfected cells. The small interference RNA for the α3 nAChR subunit tended to decrease the nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation, but not significantly. Since β4 nAChR functions as a core subunit of α3 * and α5 * nAChRs, these results suggest the involvement of β4-containing nAChRs, such as α3β4 and α5β4 nAChR, in nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation. This idea is supported by the finding showing that α-conotoxin AuIB (10 μM), an α3β4 nAChR-specific inhibitor, significantly inhibited the increase in nicotine (500μM)-induced [Ca2+]i level (Fig 4B).

Fig 4. Involvement of various nAChR subtypes and voltage-gated calcium channels in nicotine (250 μM)-induced [Ca2+]i elevation.

Fig 4

(A) Effects of siRNA treatment of nAChR subtypes (α3, α5 and β4) on nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation. (B) Effect of the α3β4nAChR-selective antagonist α-conotoxin AuIB on nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation. (C) The effect of siRNA treatment of the α7nAChR subunit on nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation. (D) The effect of MLA (5 μM), a selective α7nAChR antagonist, on nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation. Cells were pretreated with MLA for 15 min before 250 μM nicotine was added. (E) The effects of 5 μM nifedipine, an L-type Ca2+ channel antagonist, and 1 μM ω-conotoxin GVIA, an N-type Ca2+ channel antagonist, on nicotine (250 μM)-induced [Ca2+]i elevation. The cells were pretreated with inhibitors for 15 min before 250 μM nicotine was added. The data represent the means ± standard error. * p< 0.05, unpaired t-test, vs the nontreated control group or the control siRNA-treated group.

In addition, as shown in Fig 4C, the siRNA for the α7 nAChR subunit significantly decreased the nicotine (250 μM)-induced [Ca2+]i elevation. Methyllycaconitine (MLA, 5 μM), a specific α7 nAChR inhibitor, tended to inhibit nicotine (250 μM)-induced [Ca2+]i elevation but not significantly (Fig 4D). These results suggest the involvement of the α7 nAChR in nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation in SH-SY 5Y cells.

Involvement of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels in nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation

SH-SY5Y cells are known to express L-type and N-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels [21]. We investigated the effects of 5 μM nifedipine, an L-type Ca2+ channel antagonist, and 1 μM ω-conotoxin GVIA, an N-type Ca2+ channel antagonist, on nicotine (250 μM)-induced [Ca2+]i elevation. As shown in Fig 4E, although a single dose of nifedipine or ω-conotoxin GVIA did not significantly reduce the nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation, simultaneous administration of both inhibitors significantly inhibited the nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation (Fig 4E). This suggests that nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation involves voltage-gated Ca2+ channels.

Properties of acetylcholine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation in SH-SY5Y cells

In contrast to nicotine which is membrane permeable, acetylcholine, which does not permeate the plasma membrane, suggests that the selective induction of [Ca2+]i elevation is mediated through nAChRs expressed in the plasma membrane. However, because acetylcholine acts not only on nAChRs but also on muscarinic receptors, the use of atropine, a muscarinic receptor antagonist, is necessary to observe the acetylcholine-induced response mediated solely through nAChRs.

Effects of atropine on acetylcholine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation in SH-SY5Y cells

We first examined the nature of the acetylcholine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation. As shown in Fig 5A, the [Ca2+]i increase induced by 10 μM acetylcholine alone was more pronounced than the [Ca2+]i increase induced by nicotine, showing a steep rise and a slow fall. Because acetylcholine acts on muscarinic receptors and nAChR, the increase in [Ca2+]i is thought to include a muscarinic receptor-mediated response. On the other hand, as shown in Fig 5B, when 10 μM acetylcholine was coadministered with 1 μM atropine to stimulate only nAChRs, the [Ca2+]i elevation immediately decreased after a steep rise, which differed from the pattern of acetylcholine alone-induced [Ca2+]i elevation. This sharp increase and decrease in [Ca2+]i happened faster than the nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation.

Fig 5. Properties of acetylcholine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation in SH-SY5Y cells.

Fig 5

(A) Temporal changes in [Ca2+]i elevation after administration of 10 μM acetylcholine alone. The steep [Ca2+]i increase with sustained shape was prominent compared with the nicotine-induced shape. (B) Temporal changes in the [Ca2+]i elevation induced by 10 μM acetylcholine in the presence of 1 μM atropine. It is presumed that increases in [Ca2+]i are mediated though nAChRs. Compared with the outcome of acetylcholine treatment alone, the [Ca2+]i was steeply elevated but was quickly decreased. In both (A) and (B), a representative of 5 independent trials is shown. (C) Involvement of voltage-gated calcium channels in 10 μM acetylcholine and 1 μM atropine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation. Pretreatment with 5 μM nifedipine (+ nifedipine) and 1 μM ω-conotoxin GVIA (+ ω-conotoxin) significantly inhibited the acetylcholine and atropine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation (D) Involvement of α7nAChR in the [Ca2+]i increase induced by 10 μM acetylcholine with 1 μM atropine. Acetylcholine and atropine-induced calcium elevation was significantly suppressed by pretreatment with 5 μM MLA (+MLA). Data indicate the means ± standard error. * p < 0.05, unpaired t-test, vs the acetylcholine + atropine group.

Involvement of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and α7nAChR in acetylcholine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation in the presence of atropine

We next examined whether voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and α7nAChRare involved in acetylcholine (10 μM)-induced [Ca2+]i elevation in the presence of atropine (1 μM). As shown in Fig 5C, pretreatment with 5 μM nifedipine and 1 μM ω-conotoxin GVIA for 15 min significantly inhibited the increase in [Ca2+]i. As shown in Fig 5D, pretreatment with the α7nAChR-specific antagonist MLA (5 μM) significantly inhibited the [Ca2+]i increase. These results suggest that the voltage-gated Ca2+ channel and α7nAChR are involved in the acetylcholine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation in the presence of atropine.

Considering these studies elucidating the fundamental properties of nicotine- and acetylcholine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation in SHSY-5Y cells, we suggest the following hypotheses (Fig 6). There are two processes of nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation: extracellular influx and intracellular mobilization. Some outcomes of the extracellular influx are caused by the nicotine binding-triggered Ca2+ influx through nAChRs expressed in the plasma membrane. Other outcomes are caused by the opening of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, which is triggered by nAChR-induced depolarization. For intracellular mobilization, lipophilic nicotine is thought to cross the cell membrane and mobilize Ca2+ from stores, including those in the endoplasmic reticulum, through an undefined mechanism. Currently, it is unknown whether intracellular nAChRs are implicated in Ca2+ mobilization.

Fig 6. Fundamental properties of nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation in SH-SY5Y cells.

Fig 6

Nicotine may cause an increase in intracellular calcium through three mechanisms: (1) Nicotine binds to α3 * nAChR, α5 * nAChR or α7nAChR expressed in the plasma membrane, and calcium and sodium ions enter the cell. (2) The influx of cations causes depolarization, opening the voltage-gated calcium channel, and causes increased Ca2+ influx. (3) Lipophilic nicotine penetrates the plasma membrane and enters cells. The internalized nicotine mobilizes Ca2+ from stores, including those in the endoplasmic reticulum, by some mechanism. Acetylcholine, with no cell membrane permeability, binds to nicotinic and muscarinic receptors on the plasma membrane, causing an increase in intracellular calcium. We hypothesize that acetylcholine activates only the a3 * nAChRs and a5 * nAChRs expressed on the plasma membrane when muscarinic receptors, α7nAChR, and voltage-gated calcium channels are blocked by individual antagonists. In this study, therefore, we observed an increase in intracellular calcium induced by acetylcholine and the inhibitor mix as described in the main text.

In contrast to nicotine, nonmembrane-permeable acetylcholine induces [Ca2+]i increases via nAChRs and muscarinic receptors expressed in the plasma membrane. As show in Fig 5, our data suggest that voltage-gated Ca2+ channel antagonists and an α7nAChR-specific antagonist can be used to distinguish the processes involved in the Ca2+ influx mediated through α3 * and α5 * nAChRs present in the plasma membrane from those mediated by the acetylcholine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation in the presence of atropine. Therefore, to elucidate the properties of the α3 * and α5 * nAChRs exclusively present in the plasma membrane, we measured acetylcholine (10 μM)-induced [Ca2+]i elevation in the presence of atropine (1 μM), MLA (5 μM), nifedipine (5 μM) and ω-conotoxin GVIA (1 μM). We designated the solution containing atropine (1 μM), MLA (5 μM), nifedipine (5 μM) and ω-conotoxin GVIA (1 μM) an inhibitor mix. We consider acetylcholine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation in the presence of this inhibitor mix as an α3 * and α5 * nAChR-mediated outcome of Ca2+ influx.

Effects of cAMP on [Ca2+]i elevation mediated via the α3 *and α5 * nAChRs in the plasma membrane

Effects of dibutyryl cAMP (dbcAMP) treatment on α3 * and α5 * nAChR-mediated [Ca2+]i elevation

The effects of cAMP on [Ca2+]i elevation mediated via α3 * and α5 * nAChRs in the plasma membrane were investigated upon short-term (15 min) or long-term (48 h) treatment of SH-SY5Y cells with dbcAMP (1 mM), a membrane-permeable cAMP analog. As shown in Fig 7A, the cells treated with 1 mM dbcAMP for 15 min showed no significant change in the [Ca2+]i elevation induced by acetylcholine (10 μM) and the inhibitor mix, whereas 1 mM dbcAMP treatment for 48 h significantly inhibited the increase in[Ca2+]i level.

Fig 7. Effect of dbcAMP treatment on [Ca2+]i elevation as induced by acetylcholine and the inhibitor mix.

Fig 7

(A) SH-SY5Y cells were treated with 1 mM dbcAMP for 15 min (left panel) or 48 h (right panel), and the [Ca2+]i elevation induced by the acetylcholine and inhibitor mix was examined. Treatment with dbcAMP for 15 min resulted in no changes, but treatment for 48 h significantly inhibited the [Ca2+]i elevation. Data represent the means ± standard error. * p < 0.05, unpaired t-test, vs the nontreated control group. (B) Effects of 48 h-treatment with 1 mM dbcAMP on the mRNA expression of various nAChR subunits. Data represent the means ± standard error. * p < 0.05, ** p<0.01, unpaired t-test, vs the nontreated control group.

Effects of dbcAMP treatment on mRNA expression of the nAChR α3, α5 and β4 subunits

To investigate the mechanism by which the 48-h treatment with 1 mM dbcAMP significantly inhibited the acetylcholine and inhibitor mix-induced [Ca2+]i increase, we analyzed the mRNA expression of the α3, α5 and β4 subunits of the nAChRs, which are expressed in SH-SY5Y cells, using real-time PCR. As shown in Fig 7B, the mRNA levels of the α3 and β4 subunits were significantly decreased compared with those in the dbcAMP-naïve control group. These results suggest that long-term dbcAMP treatment suppressed the transcription levels of the α3 and β4 nicotinic receptor subunits, thereby decreasing the influx of Ca2+ through the α3 * β4 * nicotinic receptor.

Discussion

In our study, between 100 and 500 μM nicotine induced a [Ca2+]i elevation in SH-SY5Y cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig 1). We first examined the origin of calcium ions to clarify the mechanism by which nicotine evoked [Ca2+]i elevation. For this experiment, we prepared four conditions for extracellular and intracellular calcium (Fig 2). That is, an extracellular buffer in which calcium was replaced with EGTA was used to eliminate extracellular calcium. Thapsigargin was used to deplete calcium in the endoplasmic reticulum, which is the main source of intracellular calcium. After simultaneously completing both of these procedures, we examined the nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i increase in four different intracellular and extracellular calcium conditions (Fig 2). The results suggested that [Ca2+]i elevation had two causes: the influx of calcium from the extracellular space and the mobilization of intracellular calcium, possibly from the endoplasmic reticulum.

To further examine this outcome, we next examined the effects of the nonselective nicotinic receptor antagonist tubocurarine on nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation and nicotine-induced currents. Nicotine is highly lipophilic and readily penetrates the cell membrane. Because membrane impermeable tubocurarine almost completely suppressed nicotine-induced current (Fig 3A), the current influx is suggested be mediated by nAChRs expressed in the plasma membrane. Tubocurarine, however, did not completely suppress the nicotine-induced [Ca2 +] i elevation (Fig 3C). This finding suggests that the process insensitive to tubocurarine treatment is the response elicited by intracellularly penetrated nicotine but not the response mediated by nAChRs expressed in the plasma membrane. These findings also support the idea that a component in the intracellular calcium mobilization process contributes to nicotine-induced [Ca2 +]i elevation.

As previously reported, the mRNAs for the α3, α5, α7, β2 and β4 subunits of nAChR were expressed in SH-SY5Y cells [22]; therefore, we examined whether these nAChR subunits were involved in the occurrence of nicotine-induced [Ca2+] i elevation using siRNAs of each subunit and specific nAChR inhibitors (Fig 4). The knockdown of the α3 and α5 subunits did not significantly inhibit nicotine-induced [Ca2+] i elevation, whereas the knockdown of the β4 subunit, which is an essential component of α3 * and α5 * nAChRs, significantly inhibited nicotine-induced [Ca2 +] i elevation (Fig 4A). The nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation was also significantly inhibited by α-conotoxin AuIB, a specific antagonist of the α3β4 receptor (Fig 4B). In addition, the knockdown of the α7 subunit significantly suppressed the nicotine-induced [Ca2+] elevation (Fig 4C). This strongly suggests the involvement of nAChRs consisting of α3, α5, and α7 subunits in the nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation in SH-SY5Y cells.

Furthermore, since SH-SY5Y cells express voltage-gated L-type and N-type calcium channels [21], the involvement of these channels was investigated using the specific antagonists nifedipine and ω-conotoxin GVIA, respectively. The coadministration of nifedipine and ω-conotoxin GVIA significantly inhibited the increase in nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i level (Fig 4E), suggesting that voltage-gated L-type and N-type calcium channels are also involved in [Ca2 +] i elevation.

It is interesting that intracellular calcium mobilization is involved in nicotine-induced [Ca2 +]i elevation. It is plausible that intracellularly mobilized Ca2+ originates in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the main intracellular Ca2+ store. It has been reported that α7nAChR expressed in microglia activates PLC and releases Ca2+ from IP3 receptors in the endoplasmic reticulum [24]. In addition, calcium-induced calcium release (CICR), which is triggered by Ca2+ influx via nAChRs and subsequently activated voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, may be involved in nicotine-induced calcium mobilization [20]. These previous studies suggest that Ca2+ may also be mobilized via IP3 or ryanodine receptors in the ER by an unidentified mechanism. Alternatively, nicotine-induced Ca2+ mobilization was observed even when the nAChR-mediated current was completely blocked by tubocurarine (Fig 3). Additionally, a previous immunohistochemical study revealed the existence of the α3nAChR subunit in the ER of SH-SY5Y cells when α3β4nAChRwas exogenously expressed [25]. These findings suggest that the penetrated nicotine may directly bind to nAChRs expressed in the ER, recruiting Ca2+ to the cytosol through some mechanism.

In contrast to nicotine, acetylcholine, an agonist of the nAChR and muscarinic receptor, does not permeate the cell membrane. We hypothesized that treatment with acetylcholine in the presence of atropine, a muscarinic receptor antagonist, can activate only nAChR, which is expressed in the plasma membrane. We also found that the acetylcholine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation in the presence of atropine also involved the activation of voltage-gated calcium channels and α7nAChR (Fig 5C and 5D).

The aim of this study was to investigate the cAMP-mediated regulation of α3 * and α5 * nAChRs. There are no specific agonists of α3 * and α5 * nAChRs. Thus, it is impossible to observe a nicotine-induced [Ca2+]i increase mediated by α3 * or α5 * nAChR alone in SH-SY5Y cells. Similarly, there are no specific antagonists that act on all types of α3 * and α5 * nAChRs. Thus, we hypothesized that the processes of [Ca2+]i elevation, which are mediated though plasma membrane-expressed α3 * and α5 * nAChRs, can be observed by eliminating processes mediated through the muscarinic receptor, Ca2+ channel and α7nAChR that are associated with acetylcholine-induced [Ca2+]i increases (Fig 6); i.e., the [Ca2+]i increases induced by acetylcholine and the inhibitor mix, which contained atropine, nifedipine, ω-conotoxin GVIA and MLA, might involve components associated with α3 * and/or α5 * nAChR-mediated processes.

The [Ca2 +]i elevation induced by the acetylcholine and inhibitor mix was attenuated by prolonged treatment (48 h) with dbcAMP but not by treatment with a short duration (15 min) (Fig 7A). This phenomenon might be accompanied by a decrease in the mRNA of the α3 and β4 nAChR subunits (Fig 7B), suggesting that α3 * and α5 * nAChRs are regulated by cAMP at the level of transcription rather than by phosphorylation-related mechanisms.

One limitation of this study is that pharmacological methods have been used to analyze α3 * and α5 * nAChR-mediated reactions. Using siRNAs and specific inhibitors, it seems to be certain that a part of the nicotine response in SH-SY5Y cells is mediated by α3 * and α5 * nAChRs. However, the extent to which the α3 * and α5 * nAChR-mediated processes contribute to the [Ca2 +]i elevation induced by acetylcholine and inhibitor mix has not been quantitatively demonstrated. Further studies and methodological breakthroughs are needed. Another limitation is that the concentration of nicotine used in this experiment was relatively high. It is debatable whether the phenomena observed in this study reflect the responses of nicotine under physiological conditions. However, our previous studies have shown that isolated neurons require relatively high concentrations of nicotine to produce nicotine-induced responses [26]. In addition, if nicotine intracellularly accumulates in the brain as a result of chronic smoking or if any native factor with an allosteric effect enhances the response to nicotine, then the data we presented in this study may have physiological or pathological significance.

This study revealed that nicotine causes intracellular calcium elevation by various mechanisms in SH-SY5Y cells. It is plausible that cAMP can regulate nicotine-mediated responses via α3 * and α5 * nAChRs in the habenular nucleus. These results may help to elucidate the role of cAMP-related receptors including GPR3, which are expressed in the medial habenular nucleus, in nicotine dependence.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Effects of 100 μM tubocurarine on the nicotine (250 μM)-induced current.

The representative time plot of leak currents at -70 mV. Leak currents were sampled every ten seconds. Left panel: The bath application of nicotine (250 μM) evoked the large inward current in an SH-SY5Y cell. Nicotine was applied during a period indicated by a black line. Right panel: Pretreatment with 100 μM tubocurarine (white line) completely suppressed the nicotine-induced current. Representative data from 3experiments are presented.

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

This work was performed using equipment at the Radiation Research Center for Frontier Science, Natural Science Center for Basic Research and Development, Hiroshima University and Biosignal Research Center, Kobe University.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

N.S. was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 19H03409, 16H05133, 16K15318 and 25293061. I. H. was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 18K06891 and 15K08234. S. T. was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 18K07392 and 15K09317.

References

  • 1.Dajas-Bailador F, Wonnacott S. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and the regulation of neuronal signalling. Trends in pharmacological sciences. 2004;25(6):317–24. 10.1016/j.tips.2004.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dajas-Bailador FA, Mogg AJ, Wonnacott S. Intracellular Ca2+ signals evoked by stimulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in SH-SY5Y cells: contribution of voltage-operated Ca2+ channels and Ca2+ stores. Journal of neurochemistry. 2002;81(3):606–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dineley KT, Pandya AA, Yakel JL. Nicotinic ACh receptors as therapeutic targets in CNS disorders. Trends in pharmacological sciences. 2015;36(2):96–108. 10.1016/j.tips.2014.12.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Umana IC, Daniele CA, McGehee DS. Neuronal nicotinic receptors as analgesic targets: it’s a winding road. Biochemical pharmacology. 2013;86(8):1208–14. 10.1016/j.bcp.2013.08.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Xanthos DN, Beiersdorf JW, Thrun A, Ianosi B, Orr-Urtreger A, Huck S, et al. Role of alpha5-containing nicotinic receptors in neuropathic pain and response to nicotine. Neuropharmacology. 2015;95:37–49. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.02.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Changeux JP. Nicotine addiction and nicotinic receptors: lessons from genetically modified mice. Nature reviews Neuroscience. 2010;11(6):389–401. 10.1038/nrn2849 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.D’Souza MS, Markou A. Neuronal mechanisms underlying development of nicotine dependence: implications for novel smoking-cessation treatments. Addiction science & clinical practice. 2011;6(1):4–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Buisson B, Bertrand D. Nicotine addiction: the possible role of functional upregulation. Trends in pharmacological sciences. 2002;23(3):130–6. 10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01979-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Proulx CD, Hikosaka O, Malinow R. Reward processing by the lateral habenula in normal and depressive behaviors. Nature neuroscience. 2014;17(9):1146–52. 10.1038/nn.3779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Marks MJ, Pauly JR, Gross SD, Deneris ES, Hermans-Borgmeyer I, Heinemann SF, et al. Nicotine binding and nicotinic receptor subunit RNA after chronic nicotine treatment. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 1992;12(7):2765–84. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-07-02765.1992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fowler CD, Lu Q, Johnson PM, Marks MJ, Kenny PJ. Habenular alpha5 nicotinic receptor subunit signalling controls nicotine intake. Nature. 2011;471(7340):597–601. 10.1038/nature09797 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shih PY, Engle SE, Oh G, Deshpande P, Puskar NL, Lester HA, et al. Differential expression and function of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in subdivisions of medial habenula. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2014;34(29):9789–802. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0476-14.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tanaka S, Ishii K, Kasai K, Yoon SO, Saeki Y. Neural expression of G protein-coupled receptors GPR3, GPR6, and GPR12 up-regulates cyclic AMP levels and promotes neurite outgrowth. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2007;282(14):10506–15. 10.1074/jbc.M700911200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Miyagi T, Tanaka S, Hide I, Shirafuji T, Sakai N. The Subcellular Dynamics of the Gs-Linked Receptor GPR3 Contribute to the Local Activation of PKA in Cerebellar Granular Neurons. PloS one. 2016;11(1):e0147466 10.1371/journal.pone.0147466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tanaka S, Miyagi T, Dohi E, Seki T, Hide I, Sotomaru Y, et al. Developmental expression of GPR3 in rodent cerebellar granule neurons is associated with cell survival and protects neurons from various apoptotic stimuli. Neurobiology of disease. 2014;68:215–27. 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tanaka S, Shaikh IM, Chiocca EA, Saeki Y. The Gs-linked receptor GPR3 inhibits the proliferation of cerebellar granule cells during postnatal development. PloS one. 2009;4(6):e5922 10.1371/journal.pone.0005922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Di Angelantonio S, Piccioni A, Moriconi C, Trettel F, Cristalli G, Grassi F, et al. Adenosine A2A receptor induces protein kinase A-dependent functional modulation of human (alpha)3(beta)4 nicotinic receptor. The Journal of physiology. 2011;589(Pt 11):2755–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pugh PC, Jayakar SS, Margiotta JF. PACAP/PAC1R signaling modulates acetylcholine release at neuronal nicotinic synapses. Molecular and cellular neurosciences. 2010;43(2):244–57. 10.1016/j.mcn.2009.11.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gerzanich V, Wang F, Kuryatov A, Lindstrom J. alpha 5 Subunit alters desensitization, pharmacology, Ca++ permeability and Ca++ modulation of human neuronal alpha 3 nicotinic receptors. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 1998;286(1):311–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shen JX, Yakel JL. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated calcium signaling in the nervous system. Acta pharmacologica Sinica. 2009;30(6):673–80. 10.1038/aps.2009.64 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hettiarachchi NT, Parker A, Dallas ML, Pennington K, Hung CC, Pearson HA, et al. alpha-Synuclein modulation of Ca2+ signaling in human neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cells. Journal of neurochemistry. 2009;111(5):1192–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Groot Kormelink PJ, Luyten WH. Cloning and sequence of full-length cDNAs encoding the human neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunits beta3 and beta4 and expression of seven nAChR subunits in the human neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y and/or IMR-32. FEBS letters. 1997;400(3):309–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Squier CA. Penetration of nicotine and nitrosonornicotine across porcine oral mucosa. J Appl Toxicol. 1986;6(2):123–8. 10.1002/jat.2550060211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Suzuki T, Hide I, Matsubara A, Hama C, Harada K, Miyano K, et al. Microglial alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors drive a phospholipase C/IP3 pathway and modulate the cell activation toward a neuroprotective role. Journal of neuroscience research. 2006;83(8):1461–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mazzo F, Pistillo F, Grazioso G, Clementi F, Borgese N, Gotti C, et al. Nicotine-modulated subunit stoichiometry affects stability and trafficking of alpha3beta4 nicotinic receptor. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2013;33(30):12316–28. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2393-13.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Matsubayashi H, Inoue A, Amano T, Seki T, Nakata Y, Sasa M, et al. Involvement of alpha7- and alpha4beta2-type postsynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in nicotine-induced excitation of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra: a patch clamp and single-cell PCR study using acutely dissociated nigral neurons. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2004;129(1–2):1–7. 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2004.06.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Nirakar Sahoo

18 Aug 2020

PONE-D-20-22474

Component of nicotine-induced intracellular calcium elevation mediated though α3- and α5-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are regulated by cyclic AMP in SH-SY 5Y cells.

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Sakai,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

The manuscript has been assessed by two experts in the field; please find their comments appended at the end of this email. The reviewers have identified several issues, all of which need to be addressed in a revised version of the manuscript. In particular, I would advise you to pay attention to Major comments from Reviewers.

If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Nirakar Sahoo, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education,

 Sports and Culture and by grants from the Takeda Science Foundation, the Uehara Memorial

Foundation and the Japanese Smoking Research Association. This work was performed using

equipment at the Radiation Research Center for Frontier Science, Natural Science Center for Basic

Research and Development, Hiroshima University and Biosignal 1 Research Center, Kobe University."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"N.S. was supported by  JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 19H03409, 16H05133, 16K15318 and 25293061.

I. H. was supported by   JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 18K06891  and 15K08234.

S. T. was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 18K07392 and     15K09317."

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this article entitled “Component of nicotine-induced intracellular calcium elevation mediated though �3- and �5-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are regulated by cyclic AMP in SH-SY 5Y cells”, Takahashi and colleagues have evaluated the mechanistic aspects of regulation of intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) by nicotine acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). The authors tested nicotine and acetylcholine dependent elevation of [Ca2+]i levels as well as effect of cAMP using SHSY-5Y cell line. The authors observed nicotine and acetylcholine induced increase in [Ca2+]i levels, that nicotine dependent Ca2+ elevation was a result of both extracellular and intracellular mobilization of Ca2+ ions and that dibutyryl cAMP (dbcAMP), a cAMP analog, could suppress transcription of α3 and β4 subunits of nAChR.

In general, the results shown agree with the conclusions drawn and data has been presented in a clear and easily understandable manner. However, the authors need to address the issues described below:

1) In section 2-3, effect of tubocurarine was tested on [Ca2+]i levels of cells treated with 250 µM nicotine. A complete inhibition of inward currents was observed while [Ca2+]i was significantly reduced but not complete. Could the authors comment on why 250 µM nicotine was used rather than 500 µM. This is important since (a) in Section 2-2 (Fig. 2), to check the source of [Ca2+]i the authors used 500 µM nicotine and (b) effect of 500 µM nicotine on [Ca2+]i (Fig. 1B) was much more pronounced compared to 250 µM. Verifying the effect of 500 µM nicotine is therefore important, especially on the current.

2) Based on Fig. 1A, expression of α7 in SHSY-5Y cells is significantly lower than α3 and α5, which raises the question whether this cell line is an ideal system for studying the involvement of α7nAChR in regulating [Ca2+]i levels.

Grammatical errors / typos:

1) Typo in the title of the article “though” should be replaced by “through”.

2) Page 12, Line 4 – Fig. 4E has been mistakenly typed as Fig. 2E

Reviewer #2: Takahashi et al. investigate the role of nicotine and specific nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChRs) subunits on extracellular and intracellular calcium mobilization. Nicotine is involved in signaling in the central nervous system and is known to mediate addictive behavior. Thus, it is important to study the underlying effects of nicotine in the CNS using a cell culture model (SH-SY5Y).

The authors used various molecules that release intracellular calcium stores, including agonists and antagonists of nAChRs, muscarinic AChRs and voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs). The authors ultimately identified that the alpha-7 subunit of nAChR was important in mediated calcium mobilization. The authors proposed that nicotine affects cellular calcium response at the plasma membrane level through calcium influx through VGCCs. They also suggested that nicotine, being membrane-permeable, can induce intracellular calcium release through an unknown mechanism based on their results.

Overall, the strength of this study is the thoughtful and logical approaches they have implemented to answer their questions. Appropriate controls were included in all experiments. The authors also addressed the limitations of the study and discussed their results appropriately.

Issues that need to be addressed to improve the manuscript:

Page 3, Line 23: The authors should define “Gs” before using the abbreviation here or elsewhere.

Page 5, Line 24: For real-time qPCR using the Livak method (2^-deltadelta Ct), the authors should follow the MIQE (Minimum Information required for publication of Q-PCR Experiments) guidelines (Bustin et al. (2009), Clin Chem, 55:611-622) by providing the primer efficiencies and R-squared of the PCR.

Page 7, Line 13: The authors should indicate how many independent trials were done, and how many cells were voltage-clamped to arrive with the data they presented on Fig. 3A.

Pages 24-28, Figure Legends: The authors should consistently indicate or mention the independent trials or cell numbers if applicable. For example, on figure 1, the legend does not provide experimental trials for the left panel of Fig. 1B, but they show on the right panel n=6 for 100 uM, n=4 for 250 uM, n=4 for 500 uM). It is important to mention the trials every time especially that they mentioned that the data are represented as means +/- SEM.

Also, the same issue apply in other figures where the authors showed %fluorescence or trace, but they did not mention on the Fig Legend the experimental trials done.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0242349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242349.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


29 Sep 2020

Overall revision

We have added two authors, Takayuki Yoshida and Kana Harada, who did the experiments for revising manuscript.

Reply to reviewer #1

We appreciate the comments that lead to the improvement of this manuscript.

1) In section 2-3, effect of tubocurarine was tested on [Ca2+]i levels of cells treated with 250 µM nicotine. A complete inhibition of inward currents was observed while [Ca2+]i was significantly reduced but not complete. Could the authors comment on why 250 µM nicotine was used rather than 500 µM. This is important since (a) in Section 2-2 (Fig. 2), to check the source of [Ca2+]i the authors used 500 µM nicotine and (b) effect of 500 µM nicotine on [Ca2+]i (Fig. 1B) was much more pronounced compared to 250 µM. Verifying the effect of 500 µM nicotine is therefore important, especially on the current.

According to the reviewer’s comment, we investigated the effects of tubocurarine on the currents induced by 500 µM nicotine. As shown in revised figure 3A, 100 µM tubocurarine almost completely suppressed the current induced by 500 µM nicotine as well as the currents induced by 250 µM nicotine as shown in a former figure 3A. In addition, quantitative analysis of tubocurarine effects was added as Figure 3B.

A former figure 3A showing the effect of tubocurarine on the 250 µM nicotine-induced current has been presented as a supplemental figure 1.

We have observed nicotine-induced calcium elevation at concentrations up to 500 µM. Generally, pharmacological studies using inhibitors and siRNAs are usually performed at intermediate concentrations (preferably at ED50 concentrations) rather than at the highest concentrations tested. Therefore, in this study, we examine the effects of various inhibitors and siRNAs on nicotine-induced calcium elevation at the concentration of 250 µM. However, in the experiments shown in Figure 2, we had to observe a significant nicotine-induced calcium elevation under various conditions, so we used 500 µM nicotine, at the highest concentration of nicotine tested.

The description in the main text has been changed in accordance with the change in Figure 3 as follows.

Material methods section; page 7, line 16- page 8, line 1, page 8, line6-7

Results section; page 10, line18-24

Figure legends; page 25, line 11-20

2) Based on Fig. 1A, expression of α7 in SHSY-5Y cells is significantly lower than α3 and α5, which raises the question whether this cell line is an ideal system for studying the involvement of α7nAChR in regulating [Ca2+]i levels.

In this study, the mRNA expression of each nAChR in SHSY5Y cells was examined only once. Therefore, three new cases were examined and the results was presented as a new Figure 1A. Again, α7 expression appears to be lower than α3 and α5 expressions in the graph of new figure 1A. However, the efficiency of the primers to detect each nAChR subunit and the efficiency of the cDNA synthesis of each nAChR subunit in the process of synthesizing cDNA from mRNA are not same between each subunit. Therefore, we cannot simply judge from this graph that the expression of α7 is lower than those of α3 and α5.

A PubMed search yielded 88 papers investigating nicotine-induced calcium elevation via the α7 nAChR in SHSY-5Y cells. This fact does not suggest that SHSY-5Y cells are not ideal for studying nicotine-induced calcium elevation via the α7 nAChR.

Grammatical errors / typos:

1) Typo in the title of the article “though” should be replaced by “through”.

2) Page 12, Line 4 – Fig. 4E has been mistakenly typed as Fig. 2E

We corrected these errors in the revised manuscript.

Reply to reviewer #2

We appreciate the comments that lead to the improvement of this manuscript.

-Page 3, Line 23: The authors should define “Gs” before using the abbreviation here or elsewhere.

We have changed the description “Gs” to “Gs (stimulatory G protein)”. (page 3, line 23-24)

- Page 5, Line 24: For real-time qPCR using the Livak method (2^-deltadelta Ct), the authors should follow the MIQE (Minimum Information required for publication of Q-PCR Experiments) guidelines (Bustin et al. (2009), Clin Chem, 55:611-622) by providing the primer efficiencies and R-squared of the PCR.

We noticed that the delta Ct method was used in this study, rather than the 2^-deltadelta Ct method, to assess mRNA expression, so we have changed the description to reflect that. Information for the primer efficiencies and R-squared of the PCR have been also described in revised manuscript. (page 6, line 6-9)

And, we re-performed the RT-PCR studies three times because the experiment was done only once in a former manuscript. The new results have been presented as figure 1A.

- Page 7, Line 13: The authors should indicate how many independent trials were done, and how many cells were voltage-clamped to arrive with the data they presented on Fig. 3A.

We newly investigated the effect of tubocurarine on the current induced by 500 µM nicotine. We performed 8 independent experiments. The descriptions were changed accordingly.

Material methods section; page 7, line 16- page 8, line 1, page 8, line6-7

Results section; page 10, line18-24

Figure legends; page 25, line 11-20

- Pages 24-28, Figure Legends: The authors should consistently indicate or mention the independent trials or cell numbers if applicable. For example, on figure 1, the legend does not provide experimental trials for the left panel of Fig. 1B, but they show on the right panel n=6 for 100 µM, n=4 for 250 µM, n=4 for 500 µM). It is important to mention the trials every time especially that they mentioned that the data are represented as means +/- SEM.

In accordance with the reviewer's suggestion, we have added a description concerning the number of experiments and the representation of the data. (page 24, line 5-6, line 11, page 25, line 4-5, page 25, line 15, page 25, line 24)

With regard to data representation, we have already described them as “Data represent the means ± standard error”.

-Also, the same issue applies in other figures where the authors showed %fluorescence or trace, but they did not mention on the Fig Legend the experimental trials done.

Concerning the trace using %fluorescence, we have already described the information in materials methods and figure legends section as bellow.

The time-dependent change in intracellular calcium ion [Ca2+]i was determined by setting the fluorescence intensity to 100% before administration of nicotine or acetylcholine. (page 6, line23 -page 7, line 1)

The fluorescence before nicotine administration was assumed to be 100%, and the change in [Ca2+]i after application of nicotine at each concentration is shown ( page 24, line 9-10)

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reply to reviewer.docx

Decision Letter 1

Nirakar Sahoo

2 Nov 2020

Component of nicotine-induced intracellular calcium elevation mediated through a3- and a5-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are regulated by cyclic AMP in SH-SY 5Y cells.

PONE-D-20-22474R1

Dear Dr. Sakai,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Nirakar Sahoo, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: There are no further concern.

Authors have improved their manuscript according to previous comments by reviewers.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Abdul Qadir Syed

Acceptance letter

Nirakar Sahoo

16 Nov 2020

PONE-D-20-22474R1

Component of nicotine-induced intracellular calcium elevation mediated through α3- and α5-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are regulated by cyclic AMP in SH-SY 5Y cells.

Dear Dr. Sakai:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Nirakar Sahoo

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Effects of 100 μM tubocurarine on the nicotine (250 μM)-induced current.

    The representative time plot of leak currents at -70 mV. Leak currents were sampled every ten seconds. Left panel: The bath application of nicotine (250 μM) evoked the large inward current in an SH-SY5Y cell. Nicotine was applied during a period indicated by a black line. Right panel: Pretreatment with 100 μM tubocurarine (white line) completely suppressed the nicotine-induced current. Representative data from 3experiments are presented.

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reply to reviewer.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES