Skip to main content
microPublication Biology logoLink to microPublication Biology
. 2020 Nov 19;2020:10.17912/micropub.biology.000328. doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000328

Individual point mutations in two ERAD E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes do not affect Caenorhabditis elegans spontaneous reversal frequency

Mackenzi Oswald 1, Heino Hulsey-Vincent 1, Caroline (Lina) Dahlberg 1,§
Reviewed by: Eric Luth, Anonymous
PMCID: PMC7704249  PMID: 33274319

Figure 1. Mutations in E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme genes and glr-1 affect spontaneous reversal frequencies differently.

Figure 1. Mutations in E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme genes and glr-1 affect spontaneous reversal frequencies differently

A. Spontaneous reversal frequency assays were performed using wild type (WT) C. elegans, alongside strains harboring mutations in glr-1 or in genes that encode the E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, ubc-6 and ubc-7. Box and whisker plots show the average reversals per minute, bounded by quartiles; the line in each box represents the median of the average reversals per minute for each genotype. N=20 individual animals for all genotypes; significance relative to WT was calculated using the Tukey-Kramer test following a one-way ANOVA (*, p=0.0027 for glr-1; non-significant: p=0.58 for ubc-6; p=0.48 for ubc-7). The data is normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk test, p=0.86) and groups show equal variance (residuals vs. fitted plot). B. Schematics of E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme genes and glr-1 gene, including the locations of point mutations. Schematics were made using http://wormweb.org/exonintron. C. Crystal structures of the human E2 Ube2j2 (top, with rotated view to show the back side of the protein) and Ube2g2 (bottom, left). Models were made using Pymol. Residues that are mutated are shown in red (Ube2j2, D153; UBC-6, T158) and yellow (Ube2g2, P78, UBC-7, P79). Residue F156 of Ube2j2 is shown in cyan. Alignments of C. elegans UBC-6 and UBC-7 regions of homology, compared to putative orthologs in other eukaryotes. The highlighted residues correspond to those shown in the structures.

Description

Maintaining proteostasis, or protein homeostasis, is an important cellular function because misfolded proteins can aggregate and contribute to neurodegenerative diseases. One way that cells preserve proteostasis is through the Endoplasmic Reticulum Associated Degradation pathway (ERAD). ERAD relies on interactions between E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and E3 ubiquitin ligases to ubiquitylate misfolded proteins in order to signal for their destruction via the proteasome (Vembar and Brodsky 2008). We investigated if missense mutations in genes that encode two E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in C. elegans, UBC-6 and UBC-7, affect spontaneous reversal frequency (Brockie et al. 2001; Jones et al. 2002; Stewart et al. 2016; Zheng et al. 1999).

UBC-6 and UBC-7 are conserved across Eukaryotes (Figure 1C). We obtained strains of animals from the Million Mutation Project with the missense mutations that confer the amino acid changes T158I in UBC-6 and P79L in UBC-7. The analogous residues in human Ube2j1 or Ube2j2 and Ube2g2 are Asp160 or 153 and Proline 78, respectively, which were mapped onto the available structures of the human enzymes (Figure 1C). In Ube2j2 (C. elegans UBC-6) Asp153 makes contact with Phe156, and mutating this residue decreases the efficiency of the enzyme (Tobi Ritterhoff, personal communication). Structural alignments suggest that Pro78 (mutated in UBC-7) is part of the well-conserved HPN (Histadine-Proline-Asparagine) motif, so mutation of the analogous residue was hypothesized to abrogate enzymatic activity (Cook and Shaw 2012; Wu et al. 2003).

Our results show that the E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme mutations did not significantly affect C. elegans spontaneous reversal frequency (Figure 1A). glr-1 animals were used as a control and reversed significantly less frequently than wild-type animals, as previously reported (Kowalski et al. 2011). Both ubc-6 and ubc-7 animals had less frequent spontaneous reversals than WT animals and more frequent spontaneous reversals than glr-1 animals, but neither of these results were significant.

One clear reason for the insignificant change in reversal frequency in the ubc-6 and ubc-7 mutant animals could be that the missense mutations in these strains we observed do not affect gene function. It is also possible that UBC-6 and UBC-7 are able to compensate for each other in C. elegans. In S. cerevisiae Ubc6p and Ubc7p work cooperatively and sequentially to target substrates in coordination with the E3 ligases Doa10p (orthologous to C. elegans MARC-6), and Hrd1p (orthologous to C. elegans HRD-1 and paralogous to HRDL-1) (Sasagawa et al. 2007; Weber et al. 2016). It could be that this mechanism of tandem ubiquitylation is not conserved in C. elegans despite its conservation for human UBE2J2 (Weber et al. 2016). The human orthologs HRD1 and UBE2J1 (an additional ortholog of Ubc6p) also work together to target substrate proteins for degradation (Bays et al. 2001; Burr et al. 2011). Therefore it is possible that C. elegans E3s could collaborate with either UBC-6 or UBC-7 to target substrate proteins for degradation. In the future, we plan to address these possibilities using double ubc-6; ubc-7 point mutants and CRISPR-Cas9-targeted deletion mutants for UBC-6 and UBC-7, in combination with E3 ligase mutants.

Methods

Reversal assay protocol: Each C. elegans strain was grown on separate NGM agar plates seeded with OP50, at 21.4°C. While setting up for the reversal assays, multiple young adulthermaphroditic nematodes from each strain were picked onto separate seeded NGM agar plates and coded. This allows for blind analysis of the videotaped trials to occur when scoring the reversal assays, in order to reduce potential bias. During the assay, one animal at a time was picked using halocarbon oil (a non-food substance) from its coded seeded plate onto an unseeded NGM agar plate to induce food-seeking behavior. The animal was allowed to move around for two minutes before videotaping began. If the animal did not move away from its initial position after two minutes it was discarded and not counted in the data set. Each animal was recorded for five minutes and then discarded. At least one individual of each strain was observed during each experimental session in order to allow for any potential variations in temperature and humidity to be accounted for equally across all strains. The total N values listed represent measurements from multiple experimental sessions.

Scoring reversals: After finishing recording all reversal assay trials for an experiment, the coded trials were viewed and scored blindly by one researcher. Movement was counted as a reversal if the tip of the nose moved backwards for at least 1/6th of the animal’s body length. The position of the posterior pharyngeal bulb was used as a marker for that distance.

Recording setup: An Olympus SZ61 microscope attached to a TLB 4000 Series Substage Illuminator base was used to record the videos. The microscope was connected to The Imaging Source DFK 31AF03 color camera, which was connected to a computer running Windows OS. The software used to record the videos was Debut Professional by NCH Software.

Genotyping: The genotypes of all strains were confirmed after completing the trials. The genotypes of KP4, CLD41 and CLD43 were confirmed using PCR and DNA sequencing.

Additional point mutations from the MMP were considered for these experiments (http://genome.sfu.ca/gexplore/) but only one other available allele (ubc-6 (gk549681)) was also predicted to have an effect on enzyme function (Tobi Ritterhoff, personal communication). Although that strain was viable, we were unable to backcross it to remove background mutations. Other existing deletion mutants remove sequences outside of the coding locus of each gene. We also note that following our experiments, CRISPR-Cas9-targeted deletion mutants became available for each gene, but these were not available for use at the time of this study.

Reagents

Table 1. C. elegans strains used.

Strain Name Genotype Description Reference
N2 Wild-type
KP4 glr-1(n2461) III glr-1 putativeknockout, nonsense point mutation Hart AC et al. 1995
CLD41 ubc-6(gk146975) II*5 E2 ubiquitin- conjugating enzyme putative reduction-of-function, missense mutation, backcrossed 5 times Thompson O et al. 2013
CLD43 ubc-7(gk857464) III*5 E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme putative reduction-of-function, missense mutation, backcrossed 5 times Thompson O et al. 2013

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments

We thank the students of Western Washington University’s Biology 487 course (Spring 2020) and Dr. Jacqueline Rose for critical readings of this manuscript.

Funding

Partial funding was provided by a Research and Creative Opportunities Grant for Undergraduate Students from the Office of Research & Sponsored Programs at Western Washington University.

References

  1. Bays NW, Gardner RG, Seelig LP, Joazeiro CA, Hampton RY. Hrd1p/Der3p is a membrane-anchored ubiquitin ligase required for ER-associated degradation. Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Jan 01;3(1):24–29. doi: 10.1038/35050524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brockie PJ, Mellem JE, Hills T, Madsen DM, Maricq AV. The C. elegans glutamate receptor subunit NMR-1 is required for slow NMDA-activated currents that regulate reversal frequency during locomotion. Neuron. 2001 Aug 30;31(4):617–630. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00394-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burr ML, Cano F, Svobodova S, Boyle LH, Boname JM, Lehner PJ. HRD1 and UBE2J1 target misfolded MHC class I heavy chains for endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 18;108(5):2034–2039. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016229108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cook BW, Shaw GS. Architecture of the catalytic HPN motif is conserved in all E2 conjugating enzymes. Biochem J. 2012 Jul 15;445(2):167–174. doi: 10.1042/BJ20120504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hart AC, Sims S, Kaplan JM. Synaptic code for sensory modalities revealed by C. elegans GLR-1 glutamate receptor. Nature. 1995 Nov 01;378(6552):82–85. doi: 10.1038/378082a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jones D, Crowe E, Stevens TA, Candido EP. Functional and phylogenetic analysis of the ubiquitylation system in Caenorhabditis elegans: ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, ubiquitin-activating enzymes, and ubiquitin-like proteins. Genome Biol. 2001 Dec 12;3(1):RESEARCH0002–RESEARCH0002. doi: 10.1186/gb-2001-3-1-research0002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kowalski JR, Dahlberg CL, Juo P. The deubiquitinating enzyme USP-46 negatively regulates the degradation of glutamate receptors to control their abundance in the ventral nerve cord of Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 26;31(4):1341–1354. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4765-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sasagawa Y, Yamanaka K, Ogura T. ER E3 ubiquitin ligase HRD-1 and its specific partner chaperone BiP play important roles in ERAD and developmental growth in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Cells. 2007 Sep 01;12(9):1063–1073. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2007.01108.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stewart MD, Ritterhoff T, Klevit RE, Brzovic PS. E2 enzymes: more than just middle men. Cell Res. 2016 Mar 22;26(4):423–440. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Thompson O, Edgley M, Strasbourger P, Flibotte S, Ewing B, Adair R, Au V, Chaudhry I, Fernando L, Hutter H, Kieffer A, Lau J, Lee N, Miller A, Raymant G, Shen B, Shendure J, Taylor J, Turner EH, Hillier LW, Moerman DG, Waterston RH. The million mutation project: a new approach to genetics in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Res. 2013 Jun 25;23(10):1749–1762. doi: 10.1101/gr.157651.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vembar SS, Brodsky JL. One step at a time: endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008 Nov 12;9(12):944–957. doi: 10.1038/nrm2546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Weber A, Cohen I, Popp O, Dittmar G, Reiss Y, Sommer T, Ravid T, Jarosch E. Sequential Poly-ubiquitylation by Specialized Conjugating Enzymes Expands the Versatility of a Quality Control Ubiquitin Ligase. Mol Cell. 2016 Aug 25;63(5):827–839. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wu PY, Hanlon M, Eddins M, Tsui C, Rogers RS, Jensen JP, Matunis MJ, Weissman AM, Wolberger C, Pickart CM. A conserved catalytic residue in the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme family. EMBO J. 2003 Oct 01;22(19):5241–5250. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zheng Y, Brockie PJ, Mellem JE, Madsen DM, Maricq AV. Neuronal control of locomotion in C. elegans is modified by a dominant mutation in the GLR-1 ionotropic glutamate receptor. Neuron. 1999 Oct 01;24(2):347–361. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80849-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from microPublication Biology are provided here courtesy of California Institute of Technology

RESOURCES