Abstract
Aim:
The present investigation was intended to generate some basic data on electrocardiography (ECG) parameters in different breeds and their alterations in respect to sex and age.
Materials and Methods:
The present investigation was carried out on 239 owned dogs of 11 different breeds presented to the Institute Veterinary Clinic during 2018-2019. The animals, irrespective of breed and sex were grouped on the basis of their age groups. Recordings of rdiartR, BPL, India) at 25 mm/s paper speed and 10 mm=1 mV calibration keeping the animals on the right lateECG were performed by a single-channel ECG machine (Caral recumbence without any anesthesia. Heart rate, along with the amplitude and duration of different waves and complexes was measured.
Results:
Heart rate did not vary significantly among breeds, sex, and different age groups. The highest heart rate has been reported in Doberman and the lowest in Beagle. The heart rate was lowest at the age group of 6 months-2.5 years and highest around 10.5-12.5 years irrespective of breed and sex. The incidence of sinus arrhythmia was mostly seen in older dogs. All the waves and complexes did not vary significantly between breeds, age, and sex except P duration which was significantly (p<0.05) higher in Golden retriever and Doberman breeds.
Conclusion:
The present investigation generated some reference values of ECG in dogs which will help the clinicians to diagnose different cardiac abnormalities through ECG.
Keywords: dogs, electrocardiogram, heart rate, rhythm
Introduction
Cardiac diseases, a silent killer, are common in dogs. The reports of American Veterinary Medical Association stated that 1 in 10 dogs suffer from cardiac diseases [1]. In India, the prevalence rate of cardiac diseases in canines is also increasing at in fast rate [2]. Routine monitoring of cardiac functions is, therefore, an essential prerequisite for early diagnosis of cardiac abnormalities. Electrocardiography (ECG), a non-invasive and inexpensive techniques, is widely employed for the determination of heart rate, heart rhythm, conduction integrity, and mean electrical axis together with myocardial and pericardial affections along with monitoring certain non-cardiac abnormalities such as electrolyte imbalance, drug toxicity, and hormonal disturbances [3,4].
Scanty literatures are available on the ECG in pets in India compared to other developed countries [5,6]. Incidence and risk assessment of cardiac arrhythmias in 374 dogs of 15 different breeds with respect to age, breed, and sex and associated biochemical changes were carried out by Kumar et al. [7]. Gugjoo et al. [8] reported reference values of six limb lead ECG in 24 healthy conscious Labrador Retriever dogs. We, while, investigating the ECG pattern of three exotic breeds of trained dogs [9], encountered difficulties due to lack of appropriate reference values based on a large number of dog populations in respect to breed, sex, age, and other physiological states for accurate interpretation and appropriate therapeutic interventions [10].
Therefore, the present investigation was intended to generate some basic data on ECG parameters based on 239 dogs of 11 different breeds in respect to sex and age. Breed- and age-wise incidence of different cardiac abnormalities was also discussed.
Materials and Methods
Ethical approval
The experiments on animals including all procedures of this study were approved by Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (Registration number: 763/03/a/CPCSEA).
Study location, period and clinical subjects
The present investigation was carried out on the 239 owned dog patients presented to the Veterinary Clinic under West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, during 2018-2019 by the clients. There were 11 different breeds, namely, Mongrel (n=21), Labrador Retriever (n=26), crossbred (n=25), Spitz (n=22), Beagle (n=17), Pug (n=29), Dachshund (n=15), German Shepherd dog (n=24), Pomeranian (n=26), Golden Retriever (n=20), and Doberman (n=14). The average age was 6.9 years. Out of the total studied dogs, 42.86% (n=103) were male and 57.14% (n=136) were female. The animals irrespective of breed and sex were grouped on the basis of their age into below 6 months (n=18), 6 months-2.5 years (n=35), 2.5 years-4.5 years (n=34), 4.5 years-6.5 years (n=33), 6.5 years-8.5 years ((n=36), 8.5 years-10.5 years (n=37), 10.5 years-12.5 years (n=25), and 12.5 years-15 years (n=21).
Recording of ECG
Recordings of ECG were performed by a single-channel ECG machine (CardiartR, BPL, India) at 25 mm/s paper speed and 10 mm=1 mV calibration keeping the animals on the right lateral recumbence without any anesthesia. All the recordings of standard bipolar limb leads (I, II, and III) and unipolar augmented limb leads (aVR, aVL, and aVF) were taken on thermosensitive ECG paper (CardiartR) having width of 50 cm and recording width of 40 mm. Each small square on horizontal axis represents 0.04 second and on vertical axis represents 0.1 millivolt (mV). Amplitude of P, Q, R, S, and T waves was measured together with PR interval, QRS interval in lead II as its electrode direction matched the typical waves as the depolarization vector [11].
Measurement of heart rate, complexes, and intervals of ECG
Waves and complexes of lead-II were used as typical waves to calculate amplitude and durations of different waves and complexes as the depolarization vector is directed toward the electrode of lead-II [11]. Amplitude and duration of P, Q, R, S, and T waves were measured together with PR interval, QRS interval, and QT interval. Heart rate was calculated by successive R-R interval.
Statistical analysis
Three-way analysis of variance was used to test the significance among breeds, age groups, and sex by SPSS software version 15.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Results and discussion
Heart rate
The heart rate (bpm) in different breeds of dogs is presented in Table-1. No significant differences between different breeds of dogs in respect to heart rate were found though the highest heart rate (150.00±18.24) has been observed in Doberman and the lowest in Beagle (100.00±7.34). Sex has no significant effect on the heart rate, irrespective of age and breeds. The heart rate was lowest at the age group of 6 months-2.5 years and highest around 10.5-12.5 years irrespective of breed and sex.
Table 1.
The mean with standard error of various electrocardiography parameters of dog.
| Group | HR (bpm) | Pamp (mv) | Pdur (s) | PR interval (s) | QRSdur (s) | Ramp (mv) | QT interval (s) | Tdur (s) | Tamp (mv) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 119.24±4.4 | 0.25±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.07±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 1.31±0.07 | 0.19±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.22±0.014 |
| Variation between breeds | |||||||||
| Mongrel | 108±18.5 | 0.25±0.03 | 0.04b±0.01 | 0.09±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 1.65±0.47 | 0.18±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.21±0.014 |
| Labrador | 132.13±8.5 | 0.23±0.02 | 0.04b±0.01 | 0.07±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 1.41±0.11 | 0.18±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.23±0.014 |
| Crossbred | 109.6±1.14 | 0.27±0.06 | 0.04b±0.01 | 0.10±0.02 | 0.04±0.01 | 1.30±0.35 | 0.2±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.21±0.014 |
| Spitz | 111.00±9.4 | 0.26±0.02 | 0.04b±0.01 | 0.06±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 1.40±0.10 | 0.2±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.23±0.014 |
| Beagle | 100.00±7.3 | 0.20±0.03 | 0.02b±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.02±0.01 | 0.70±0.16 | 0.2±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.23±0.014 |
| Pug | 125.00±10.2 | 0.23±0.06 | 0.04b±0.01 | 0.07±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.75±0.26 | 0.16±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.24±0.014 |
| Dachshund | 115.00±12.3 | 0.20±0.10 | 0.04b±0.01 | 0.08±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 1.15±0.25 | 0.2±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.24±0.014 |
| German Shepherd dog | 145.00±5.00 | 0.25±0.05 | 0.06a,b±0.02 | 0.08±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 1.43±0.30 | 0.18±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.21±0.014 |
| Pomeranian | 106.25±3.75 | 0.28±0.03 | 0.04a±0.01 | 0.07±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 1.07±0.31 | 0.18±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.22±0.014 |
| Golden retriever | 140.50±25.5 | 0.45±0.05 | 0.08a±0.04 | 0.06±0.02 | 0.04±0.01 | 1.70±0.10 | 0.2±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.21±0.014 |
| Doberman | 150.00±18.2 | 0.30±0.10 | 0.08a±0.02 | 0.12±0.03 | 0.04±0.01 | 1.320±0.1 | 0.18±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.23±0.014 |
| p-value | 0.69 | 0.42 | 0.05* | 0.1 | 0.45 | 0.08 | 0.43 | 0.06 | 0.6 |
| Variation between sex | |||||||||
| Male | 120.07±7.88 | 0.24±0.02 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.08±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 1.34±0.11 | 0.15±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.22±0.014 |
| Female | 118.61±5.13 | 0.27±0.02 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.7±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 1.28±0.10 | 0.18±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.21±0.013 |
| p-value | 0.87 | 0.34 | 0.85 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.66 | 0.31 | 0.46 | 0.06 |
| Variation between different age groups | |||||||||
| <6 months | 108.75±4.20 | 0.20±0.04 | 0.03b±0.01 | 0.06±0.01 | 0.03±0.01 | 1.10±0.45 | 0.2±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.22±0.012 |
| 6 months-2.5 years | 101.25±5.15 | 0.23±0.03 | 0.04b±0.01 | 0.06±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 1.03±0.20 | 0.18±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.22±0.012 |
| 2.5-4.5 years | 134.00±3.23 | 0.29±0.02 | 0.04b±0.01 | 0.08±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 1.02±0.12 | 0.19±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.22±0.011 |
| 4.5-6.5 years | 109.67±6.57 | 0.25±0.04 | 0.03b±0.01 | 0.07±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 1.43±0.24 | 0.2±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.22±0.011 |
| 6.5-8.5 years | 122.32±7.39 | 0.27±0.02 | 0.05a,b±0.01 | 0.06±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 1.57±0.11 | 0.21±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.21±0.012 |
| 8.5-10.5 years | 114.67±5.91 | 0.22±0.03 | 0.03b±0.01 | 0.08±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 1.28±0.20 | 0.18±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.22±0.012 |
| 10.5-12.5 years | 122.33±36.6 | 0.30±0.10 | 0.07a±0.03 | 0.11±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 1.20±0.23 | 0.2±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.21±0.013 |
| 12.5-15 years | 102.50±2.50 | 0.25±0.05 | 0.04b±0.01 | 0.06±0.02 | 0.04±0.01 | 1.65±0.15 | 0.19±0.01 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.23±0.013 |
| p-value | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.05* | 0.1 | 0.08 | 0.19 | 0.54 | 0.08 | 0.07 |
Values are expressed as mean±SE. Values with different superscripts within a column differ significantly (p<0.01)
The variation of heart rate in different breeds of dogs obtained in this investigation may occur due to several factors such as exercise, age, breed, body condition score, motor activity, and sleep [12]. We found slightly lower values in Beagle when compared to that of Hanton and Rabemampianina [13], in the same breed of dogs. The heart rate of GSD obtained in this study was corroborated with the earlier reports of Rezakhani et al. [14] but higher than trained GSD reported by Mukherjee et al. [9]. The Labrador breeds were exhibiting higher heart rate in this study than the earlier report [8]. The heart rate of Mongrels was within the range as reported by Schneider et al. [15]. The variability in the heart rates has been studied earlier among different breeds such as Doberman [16], Spaniels [17], and Beagles [18], both in clinically healthy and diseased model. However, most of the studies considered a single breed rather than comparing different breeds of dogs. In one of our previous investigations [9], we compared the heart rates in trained Labrador, German Shepherd, and Golden Retriever dogs used in police dog squad. In comparison with these data with the present investigation, it was depicted that trained dogs exhibited lower heart rates compared to normal dogs of the same breeds. In a related study, Doxey and Boswood [19] compared GSD, Labrador, Cocker Spaniels, Boxer, Bulldog, and Cavalier King Charles spaniels for heart rate variation and found no significant differences among breeds.
Heart rhythm
The majority of dogs under study were exhibited normal sinus rhythm (25.40%). The incidence of sinus arrhythmia was 15.87% which was mostly common in older dogs (10.5-12.5 years). Spitz breeds were most susceptible to sinus arrhythmia depicted in this study. Sinus tachycardia was found in 17.46% of dogs under investigation of which Labrador and Spitz were most susceptible and its incidence was maximum in the age group of 2.5-4.5 years and 6.5-8.5 years. The incidence of bradycardia was less (3.17%) with the maximum occurrence in Spitz.
The overall incidence of arrhythmia depicted in the present investigation was slightly lower than the earlier reports of Kumar et al. [7] (21.92%) and higher than the reports of Sarita [20] (7.67%). The highest incidences of cardiac arrhythmias were reported in Pomeranian [7,20] but, in our investigation, we found that the incidence was highest in Spitz and Labrador. This could be probably due to less number of observations (2%) in this breed during investigation. The age-wise incidence of cardiac arrhythmias was in accordance with the earlier observation [21] reported a higher incidence of cardiac arrhythmias in pups and older dogs.
Waves and complexes of ECG
The values of different waves and complexes of ECG in different breeds, age groups, and sex are presented in Table-1. In this investigation, measurements of waves and complexes were made from lead-II as it is directed toward the electrode of lead II and considered as waves of typical depolarization vector [9,10]. We did not get any significant variation (p>0.05) between breeds, age, and sex in the amplitude of P wave, the first positive wave denoting atrial depolarization in lead-I, II, III, and aVF though significant variations (p<0.05) found in P wave duration between different breeds and different age groups. We found no significant differences (p>0.05) between breed and age groups in our previous study [9] on the trained breed of dogs. The values of P wave amplitude were in accordance with the earlier reports of Burman et al. [22] but higher than the other reports [8,9,23]. On breed-wise comparison, the values were similar for earlier reports in Beagle [13] and Labrador, but the values for Golden Retriever were lower than the earlier reports [9] and the values were higher for GSD compared to the earlier studies [9,14]. The variation in the P wave amplitude may be in response to heart rate and stress [8]. The sex has no effect on P wave configuration as corroborated by the earlier studies [13]. On contrary, Upeniece [24] showed that P waves in lead-I and aVF were correlated with sex and body weight. The obtained values of PR interval representing the nodal delay and the time required for the electrical impulses to travel from SA node to AV node were supported by earlier works [9,25].
The Q wave is the first negative deflection in lead-II and represents the electrical transmission into intraventricular septum. Earlier report [22] showed the presence of Q wave in lead I, II, III, and aVF and absence in lead aVR and aVL. However, in contrary, Avizeh et al. [22] and Bernal et al. [26] reported the presence of Q wave in all the leads. We also found Q waves in all the leads without any significant variation in the amplitude between breeds, age, and sex. Bernal et al. [26] also reported a non-significant difference between sex and body weight. However, Sato et al. [27] reported that altered Q wave amplitude between different breeds may be associated with thoracic peculiarities of different dogs.
In the present study, QRS duration representing ventricular depolarization in the dogs, the increase of which is indicative of ventricular enlargement [25] was similar between breeds, sex, and age groups and in accordance with the earlier reports [9,21].
The R wave represents the depolarization of major ventricular muscles and used to diagnose the left ventricular function [25]. In our current investigation, R wave did not vary significantly between breeds, but non-significant higher values were obtained in Labrador, GSD, Mongrels, and Doberman compared to small breeds. Earlier reports [25] also stated higher R wave amplitude in large breeds of dogs due to increased ventricular surface area and thickened wall in large breeds compared to smaller ones.
The QT intervals obtained in this investigation were in accordance with the earlier reports [8,9]. Normally QT interval is the representative of ventricular systole and it is the summation of ventricular depolarization and repolarization [23]. QT interval varied between wide range and under the influence of catecholamines and vagal activity [23], but, in this investigation, there were no significant differences between different breeds, sex, and age groups.
The repolarization of ventricular myocardium can be represented in T wave and normally it should be less than one-fourth amplitude of R wave [25]. T wave amplitude and duration obtained in this investigation were in accordance with the earlier reports [8,27] but lower than the reports of Gugjoo et al. [8]. In this investigation, 44% of dogs exhibited positive T wave and 56% of dogs appeared with inverted T wave. The reasons for altered polarity of T wave were not fully understood [28,29], but some authors suggested that the elevation of diaphragm during respiration could be one of the probable reasons behind the altered polarity of T wave in lead-II [7]. Breed-wise variations in the T wave polarity have also been documented in our previous study [9]. In some dogs, ventricular repolarization occurs in the same direction as depolarization, from inside the ventricles (endocardium) to outside (epicardium). This repolarization pattern generates a negative voltage in the left chest member, compared to the right chest member, forming a deflection of the negative T wave [30].
Conclusion
The present investigation generates some basic data on canine electrocardiographic patterns in different breeds which expand the existing knowledge to help the clinicians for monitoring cardiac abnormalities in different breeds and different age groups.
Authors’ Contributions
JM planned the study. SSM, SJ, JM, DB, and KD recorded the data. PKD analyzed the data. JM and PRG drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors are highly thankful to the honorable Vice-Chancellor, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, for providing necessary facilities and financial support (ICAR Development Grant 2018-19 Sub Head 7.2 (No. VCS/WBUAFS/1-18(Pt-III)/131(5)/4 dt. 10.10.2018) to carry out this work.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Veterinary World remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliation.
References
- 1.Schrope D.P. Prevalence of congenital heart disease in 76, 301 mixed-breed dogs and 57, 025 mixed-breed cats. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2015;17(3):192–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jvc.2015.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Reetu Hoque, M Saxena A.C, Pawde A.M, Verma N.K, Kalaiselvan P, Dey S. Incidence of cardiac diseases in dogs:A retrospective study. Indian J. Vet. Med. 2017;37(1-2):64–67. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Baisan R.A, Rosa A.D, Loria A.D, Vulpe V, Pinantedosi D. Cardiac biomarkers in clinical practice in dogs and cat-a review. Hum. Vet. Med. 2016;6(1):51–58. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bodh D, Hoque M, Saxena A.C, Gugjoo M.B, Bist D. Diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy and pericardial effusion in two dogs. Indian J. Vet. Surg. 2016;37(1):48–50. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Thirunavukkarasu P. Prevalence of canine acquired heart diseases in Chennai, India. Int. J. Livest. Res. 2019;9(3):331–339. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gupta D.K, Singh J.L, Kumar M. Clinico-pathological changes in cardiac arrhythmia in dogs. Indian J. Vet. Med. 2007;27:91–94. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kumar A, Dey S, Mahajan S. Incidence and risk assessment of cardiac arrhythmias in dogs with respect to age, breed, sex and associated biochemical changes. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2014;2(5):277–281. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gugjoo M.B, Hoque M, Saxena A.C, Zama M.M.S. Reference values of six-limb-lead electrocardiogram in conscious Labrador retriever dogs. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2014;17(5):689–695. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2014.689.695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mukherjee J, Das P.K, Ghosh P.R, Banerjee D, Sharma T, Basak D, Sanyal S. Electrocardiogram pattern of some exotic breeds of trained dogs:A variation study. Vet. World. 2015;8(11):1317–1320. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.1317-1320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hoque M, Saxena A.C, Reetu Gugjoo M.B, Bodh D. Cardiac diseases in dogs. Indian J. Anim. Health. 2019;58(1):1–20. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Okutucu S, Oto A. Interpreting ECGs in Clinical Practice. Springer, Cham: Clinical Practice; 2018. Fundamentals of ECG. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schreiner P.J. Emerging cardiovascular risk research:Impact of pets on cardiovascular risk prevention. Curr. Cardiovasc. Risk Rep. 2016;10(2):8. doi: 10.1007/s12170-016-0489-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hanton G, Rabemampianina Y. The electrocardiogram of the Beagle dog:Reference values and effect of sex, genetic strain, body position and heart rate. Lab. Anim. 2006;40(2):123–136. doi: 10.1258/002367706776319088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rezakhani A, Atwell R.B, Webster J. Electrocardiographic values of German shepherd dogs. Aust. Vet. J. 1990;67(8):307–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1990.tb07806.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schneider H.P, Truex R.C, Knowles J.O. Comparative observations of the hearts of mongrel and Greyhound dogs. Anat. Rec. 1964;149(2):173–179. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091490202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Calvert C.A, Wall M. Effect of severity of myocardial failure on heart rate variability in doberman pinschers with and without echocardiographic evidence of dilated cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2001;219(8):1084–1088. doi: 10.2460/javma.2001.219.1084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Haggstrom J, Hamlin R.L, Hansson K, Kvart C. Heart rate variability in relation to severity of mitral regurgitation in cavalier King Charles spaniels. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1996;37(2):69–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1996.tb01941.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Eaton G.M, Cody R.J, Nunziata E, Binkley P.F. Early left ventricular dysfunction elicits activation of sympathetic drive and attenuation of parasympathetic tone in the paced canine model of congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1995;92(3):555–561. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.3.555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Doxey S, Boswood A. Differences between breeds of dog in a measure of heart rate variability. Vet. Rec. 2004;154(23):713–717. doi: 10.1136/vr.154.23.713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sarita D. Epidemiological Studies of Canine Cardiac Diseases Including Clinicopathology, Diagnosis and Therapeutic, M.V.Sc., Thesis. Gujarat, India: Anand Agriculture University; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Changkija B. Electrocardiographic Studies in Dogs with Reference to Management of Cardiac Tachyarrhythmia by Alternative Drugs. Ph.D., Thesis. Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India: Indian Veterinary Research Institute; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Burman S.O, Kahn S, Panagopoulos P. The electrocardiogram of the normal dog. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1966;51(3):379–382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Avizeh R, Papahn A.A, Ranjbar R, Rasekh A.R, Molaee R. Electrocardiographic changes in the littermate mongrel dogs from birth to six months of life. Iran. J. Vet. Res. 2010;11(433):304–310. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Upeniece D. Electrocardio Physiological Parameters of the Cocker Spaniel Rottweiler and German Shepherd Dogs, Ph.D., Thesis. Jelgava: Latvia University of Agriculture, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Preclinical Institute; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tilley L.P. Essentials of canine and feline electrocardiography. In: Cann C.C, editor. Interpretation and Treatment. Vol. 3. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bernal L.J, Montes A.M, Del Palacio M.J.F, Parrizo C.G. Electrocardiographic changes in the growing Mastin Espanol. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1995;36(5):221–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1995.tb02902.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sato H, Fujii Y, Wakao Y. Standard electrocardiographic values in normal retrievers. Adv. Anim. Cardiol. 2000;33(1):11–15. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Su W.L, Too K, Wang M.H, Jiang Y.N, Pan M.J. Reference values of six-limb-lead ECG in conscious Taiwanese dogs. Adv. Anim. Cardiol. 2001;35(2):86–95. [Google Scholar]
- 29.van Oosterom A. Genesis of the T wave as based on an equivalent surface source model. J. Electrocardiol. 2001;34(Suppl):217–227. doi: 10.1054/jelc.2001.28896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Klein L.R, Shroff G.R, Beeman W, Smith S.W. Electrocardiographic criteria to differentiate acute anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction from left ventricular aneurysm. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2015;33(6):786–790. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.03.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]