Abstract
The time that waves spend inside 1D random media with the possibility of performing Lévy walks is experimentally and theoretically studied. The dynamics of quantum and classical wave diffusion has been investigated in canonical disordered systems via the delay time. We show that a wide class of disorder—Lévy disorder—leads to strong random fluctuations of the delay time; nevertheless, some statistical properties such as the tail of the distribution and the average of the delay time are insensitive to Lévy walks. Our results reveal a universal character of wave propagation that goes beyond standard Brownian wave-diffusion.
Subject terms: Materials science, Optics and photonics, Physics
Introduction
A wave packet launched into a scattering region can penetrate that region and it may be reflected eventually. Thus, one might wonder how much time the wave packet has spent inside the media. This fundamental question was addressed by Wigner and Smith1,2. It was shown that the delay time of a wave packet is related to the derivative of the reflection phase with respect to the frequency : .
The delay time has received attention in many disciplines since it reveals information on the scattering medium and, therefore, it has also been of interest from an application point of view; e.g., the delay time is a fundamental quantity in imaging of tissues in optical coherence tomography3,4.
A major issue in wave transport is the presence of disorder. Moreover, if waves propagate coherently through 1D random media, complex interference effects emerge, such as the widely studied phenomenon of Anderson localization5,6: an exponential decay in space of classical and quantum waves, for instance, electromagnetic waves and electrons, respectively.
Since disorder is ubiquitous in real systems, there has been a great interest in studying the effects of Anderson localization on dynamical quantities such as the delay time. Microwave experiments have been performed to analyze statistical properties of wave dynamics7–9, while several theoretical approaches have been developed to describe the delay-time statistics (see Ref.10 for a review).
Remarkably, it has been demonstrated that some statistical properties of the delay time are invariant in the sense that they are independent of the details of the medium. For instance, the inverse square power decay of the distribution of has been predicted in semi-infinite 1D systems11 and also studied in higher dimensions12–14. Another example is the average delay time, which is proportional to the mean length of trajectories15. This quantity was predicted to be invariant with respect to details of the scattering region, as recently observed experimentally15–17.
Previous experimental and theoretical works on the delay time in 1D consider only models of disorder that lead to Anderson localization, however, there is a wide class of disorder—Lévy disorder—that leads to delocalization or anomalous localization, in relation to the Anderson localization18–21. Anomalous localization finds its origin in the nonzero probability that waves travel a long distance without being scattered; these events are scarce but have a large impact. Such kind of events are sometimes called Lévy flights, however, the term Lévy flights is mostly used to study processes where the jumps or flights are instantaneous, while in Lévy walks, the velocity of the flights is constant, as in our study.
Here, we experimentally and theoretically study the delay time of reflected microwaves suffering coherent multiple scattering in a medium characterized by random spacings of scatterers following a one-sided Lévy -stable distribution. Experiments in waveguides with standard disorder (i.e., with random scatterer separations following a non-heavy tailed distribution) are also performed to compare results with those of Lévy disorder. Additionally, numerical simulations are carried out to overcome some practical limitations of experiments and to obtain further support for our model. We calculate the distribution of the delay time and, furthermore, our results allow us to conclude that universal features of the delay time in canonical disordered media go beyond standard Brownian models of wave diffusion, despite the fact that the presence of Lévy walks leads to stronger random fluctuations of the delay time.
Lévy statistics have been found in a broad range of contexts that go from foraging patterns of marine predators22 to fluctuations of stock market indices23 or resonant emission of light24. Lévy models are applied to describe anomalous diffusion of particles and waves that cannot be described by standard Brownian models25–32.
Essentially, Lévy random processes are characterized by probability distributions whose tails decay like a power-law, i.e., if x is a random variable with probability density , then for 33. Fluctuations of random variables that follow Lévy statistics are so large that the first and second moments diverge for .
Results
Experiments
Microwaves are launched into an aluminum waveguide containing 2.5 mm thick dielectric slabs whose separations follow a Lévy -stable distribution (see Fig. 1). We work in a frequency range where a single transport channel is supported. Two different -stable distributions characterized by their power-law decay have been chosen: and 3/4. Additionally, a conventional disordered microwave waveguide with random spacing between slabs following a Gaussian distribution has been built. Using a network vector analyzer, we measure the scattering matrix S:
| 1 |
where R and T are the reflection and transmission coefficients, respectively. Measurements of S are thus collected over different disorder realizations.
Figure 1.
(a) Schematic view of the experimental setup. The aluminum waveguide (1), containing randomly distributed dielectric slabs, is connected to the ports of a vector network analyzer (2) and the data is stored in a computer (3).(b) Actual 2 m long aluminum waveguide (22.8 mm width and 10.6 mm height). The top is open to allow inner vision.
From the collected S-matrices, we obtain and the probability distribution function . Figure 2a,b show the distribution with (red) and 3/4 (green), respectively. The insets show on a logarithmic scale for a better visualization of the tail. In Fig. 2b, the delay-time distribution (blue histogram) for conventional disorder is also shown. Both distributions in Fig. 2b have the same average value . We can observe that the profile of both distributions (green and blue histograms) is different.
Figure 2.
Experimental delay-time distributions (histograms) for Lévy waveguides characterized by (a) and at 9.9 GHz (red histogram) and (b) and at 11.2 GHz (green histogram). The blue histogram in (b) corresponds to random waveguides with ordinary (Gaussian) disorder with at 11.2 GHz. The histograms were constructed with (a) 4590 and (b) 1890 data. Insets show on a logarithmic scale. Red, green (blue) solid curves show the theoretical predictions from Eq. (4) (Eq. (3)). Experimental delay times for a typical realization of the disorder of waveguides with (c) and (d) 3/4. Black dots represent the average of over frequency windows GHz. The horizontal black dashed lines are the averages of over the complete frequency window (8–12 GHz).
The distributions from our model, which we introduce below, are also shown (solid lines) in Fig. 2a,b. It is observed in Fig. 2a that for , shows a small peak in the tail. The distribution for in Fig. 2b also exhibits a peak, but it is smoother and occurs at a larger value of , outside of the time range shown in Fig. 2b. We attribute these peaks to scattering processes that reach the right boundary of the waveguide; in Lévy disordered samples those processes are favored since waves can travel long distances without being scattered. In contrast, for ordinary disordered systems, decays monotonically and for , 11.
The trend of the experimental distributions (histograms) is well described by the model (solid lines), despite the fact that the statistics of is extracted from a limited amount of experimental data and the presence of a small tail for negative values of observed in Fig. 2a,b. Negative delay times are not considered in our model and are thus a source for discrepancies between experimental and theoretical results. It has been proposed that those negative values are due to a strong distortion of the wave packet produced due to interference between incident and promptly reflected waves34–37.
We now address an invariance property of the mean path of trajectories with respect to the details of the disordered medium. This invariance property is equivalent to the independence of the average delay time with energy since both quantities are proportional15. To illustrate this invariance, in Fig. 2c,d, is plotted as a function of the linear frequency for typical samples with and 3/4, respectively. We see strong fluctuations of , however, the average delay-time over frequency windows GHz) is essentially independent of the frequency, as it is observed in both figures (dots). Moreover, the average over the whole frequency window (horizontal dashed line) has the same value (s) for both cases: and 3/4, and thus, it is independent of particularities of the medium. We will address this point later in more detail.
Model
For conventional disorder and within a random matrix approach to localization38,39, the mean free path determines the statistical properties of the transport and it is related to the transmission by , which is proportional to the number of scatterers n in the system, i.e., with b constant40. If the random spacing between scatterers follows a Lévy -stable distribution, the number of scatterers in a system of length L is subject to strong random fluctuations. Such fluctuations are described by the probability density given by18: , where is the probability density function of the Lévy -stable distribution with exponent and scale parameter c. For , . Therefore, with the knowledge of and the delay-time probability density for canonical disordered systems, , we write the probability density for Lévy disordered systems as
| 2 |
The probability density in its full generality remains, however, an open problem. For semi-infinite disordered systems, assuming no transmission, the limit () delay-time distribution is given by11,41–45: , where is the scattering time of the disorder. Real systems, however, are finite and finite-size effects may be of relevance. In particular, our experiments are performed in 2 m long waveguides and microwaves can be transmitted.
Our model for that will be verified experimentally and numerically involves two main assumptions. Firstly, though the waves in our waveguides can be transmitted, we use a relationship between in the absence of absorption and R in the presence of weak absorption that assumes negligible transmission: , where is the absorption time which is assumed very large45–47. A key point is that this relationship establishes that fluctuations of R determine the statistics of . Notice that for an ensemble of different samples, fluctuates since it depends on the disorder configuration. Indeed, later will be identified with , which contains information about the system length. Secondly, we use the Laguerre ensemble which describes the statistics of R assuming large samples48. We have verified that the Laguerre ensemble describes well our experimental results for the reflection of canonical disordered waveguides even though they are 2m long. See supplemental material (SM). That is, where and is a constant. For systems with absorption () and , while for systems with amplification (), with . For the latter case . Let us stress that for systems of finite length, can exceed since, for instance, is infinite for transmitted waves. We thus need to consider both cases and . Therefore, after the change of variable , the normalized distribution can be expressed as
| 3 |
where and is the group velocity. In writing Eq. (3), we conveniently measure the delay time in units of , i.e., we replaced . The above expression for is obtained after making and the change of variable in the Laguerre ensemble with . Notice that with the absolute value in Eq. (3), both cases and are considered. Our assumptions may overestimate , mainly for , since some of the scattering processes that reach the right end of the sample may leave the waveguide, having actually an infinite reflection delay time. Thus, as the systems become shorter, discrepancies between our model and experiments or simulations are expected. On the other hand, Eq. (3) reduces to for . Additionally, since Eq. (3) is based on the Laguerre ensemble, in the SM we have experimentally and numerically verified the distribution of the reflection coefficient predicted by the Laguerre ensemble.
We now define with and, for a system of fixed L, which is given by18: , where . Therefore, using Eqs. (2) and (3), we write the distribution of for Lévy disordered samples as
| 4 |
where is given in Eq. (3) with s replaced by . The experimental distributions in Fig. 2 have been compared with Eqs. (3, 4) using as a fitting parameter.
Numerical simulations are now performed for further support of Eq. (4) and to reveal universal properties. Thus, the number of disorder realizations is greatly increased and absorption, which reduce the effects of long trajectories, is absent. Details of the numerical simulations are provided in the SM.
Figure 3 compares numerical and theoretical delay time distributions from Eqs. (3) and (4) for standard and Lévy disordered waveguides with and 3/4 and . For conventional disorder, our simulations show a physically meaningful result: the absorption time can be identified with the average . After this identification, since can be extracted from the numerical simulations, there is no free fitting parameters in Eq. (3). Similarly, for Lévy disorder has been found to fit the numerical distributions with (for the standard disorder, ). This result is appealing, however, its formal demonstration remains as an open problem.
Figure 3.

Numerical delay-time distributions with parameters (red histogram) and (green histogram) and for random waveguides with conventional (Gaussian) disorder (blue histogram). In all cases . The histograms were constructed with disorder realizations. The solid curves are the theoretical predictions from Eqs. (3) and (4) for standard and Lévy disorder, respectively. The dashed line, proportional to , is a guide to the eye.
Although the distribution profiles in Fig. 3 are different and show the impact of Lévy walks, they share some properties that are not evident because of the different time scale of each case.
In order to compare for different system parameters, it is convenient to express in units of , as shown in Fig. 4 for and 3/4, left and right panels, respectively, and and 4, upper and lower panels, respectively. A notorious difference with respect to the distribution for standard disordered systems (Fig. 3, blue line) is that a peak appears at , which is precisely the time that a wave would spend on traveling back and forth between the boundaries of the waveguide in the absence of disorder.
Figure 4.
Numerical distributions (histograms) for Lévy disordered systems characterized by (a,c) and (b,d) with (a,b) and (c,d) . Each histogram was obtained from disorder realizations. The solid curves are the theoretical predictions from Eq. (4). Insets show in a logarithmic scale. The dashed lines, following the power law , are a guide to the eye (see also SM).
For shorter systems (Fig. 4c,d), we notice a deviation, mainly at the distribution tails, of the theoretical predictions (solid lines) with respect to the numerical results. Also, the numerical simulations start to deviate from the decay (see insets in Fig. 4c,d), which is expected since the transmission is higher as the waveguide becomes shorter.
We now show that some properties of go beyond canonical disorder models. We have already mentioned the inverse square decay of the delay time distributions for obtained in 1D semi-infinite Anderson localized systems; indeed, such power-law behavior has been explained by resonance models in the localized regime11,44,49. For Lévy disordered structures, the insets of Fig. 4a,b compare the tail of the distributions for and 3/4, respectively, with decay (dashed lines); see also the SM for further details and numerical fits of the tails. Actually, from Eqs. (3) and (4), we also find that for .
Additionally, the average is a linear function of the system length: , as shown in Fig. 5a for and 3/4 (inset), which is also observed in standard disordered systems11,43. Furthermore, an interesting invariance property of the mean length of random walk trajectories with respect to the details of the disorder16 has been recently investigated in optical experiments17. The invariance of the mean path length is equivalent to the independence of the average delay-time to the energy. We have already shown experimental evidence of this invariance in Fig. 2c,d. Figure 5b provides additional numerical evidence by showing for disordered systems of different lengths with and 3/4. We observe that is constant with the linear frequency . Thus, these results give further evidence that the invariance of the mean path length goes beyond Brownian random walk models. This invariance can be explained by a direct relation between the delay time and the density of states2, as was studied in15 from ballistic to localized regimes.
Figure 5.
(a) Numerical average delay-time for Lévy disorder as a function of the length L for different linear frequencies ( GHz) with (main frame) and (inset). (b) as a function of for several lengths L for (red symbols) and (green symbols). The averages are obtained from disorder realizations. The horizontal solid lines correspond to in each case.
Discussion
We have studied experimentally and theoretically the impact of Lévy walks on a fundamental dynamical quantity: the delay time. Although the delay-time distributions for Lévy and canonical disordered structures are different, remarkably, some properties are invariant, e.g., the inverse square power-law decay of the delay-time distribution and the insensitivity of the average delay time to energy. The latter is equivalent to the invariance of the mean path length observed in experiments of light propagation. Additionally, the linear dependence of the average delay time with the length in ordinary disordered media is not affected by the presence of Lévy walks. Altogether, our results reveal a universal character of wave propagation that goes beyond standard Brownian models15–17.
We point out that in Lévy disordered systems with , the mean free path is meaningless since it diverges, in contrast to canonical disordered systems in which the mean free path settles the wave statistics. In the presence of Lévy type of disorder, two quantities determine the transport statistics: and the logarithmic transmission average.
Our model shows a good agreement with experimental and numerical results, however, only structures with a single transport channel or 1D systems have been considered. Although nowadays 1D wave transport is of relevance, it would be desirable to extend our study to higher dimensions. Nevertheless, the ideas and results presented here are so general that they can be applied from classical to quantum waves in disordered media.
Methods
To determinate experimentally the delay times , we employ the experimental setup schematically described in Fig. 1. We use a 2 meters long aluminum waveguide with a rectangular cross-section (22.8 mm width and 10.6 mm height) in which we insert a random distribution of dielectric scatterers. Each scatterer consists of a 2.5 mm thick dielectric slab. The slabs are made of FR4, a composite material with low losses, its dielectric permittivity is .
With those dimensions of the waveguide, the fundamental mode TE10 propagates along the waveguide in the frequency range from 7.5 to 15 GHz. Within this frequency window, the waveguide can be effectively considered as a 1D random waveguide. A two-port vector network analyzer (VNA) ZVA 24 from Rohde & Schwarz (2 in Fig. 1) with a resolution of 1 Hz is employed to generate and receive microwave signals in the region of interest. The ports of the VNA are used alternatively as sources and receivers of the microwave signals. Each port is connected to the aluminum waveguide by means of standard X-band microwave transitions placed at both sides of the waveguide. This allows the measurements of the four matrix elements of the complex S-matrix, , where is the linear frequency. In particular, the phase of the reflection amplitude is obtained as given in Eq. (1).
From the set of measured phases , we compute the delay times as
where GHz.
We have built waveguides with both Lévy and canonical types of disorder. For the Lévy waveguides, the dielectric slabs have been placed accordingly to a - stable distribution with parameters and 3/4, i.e., for . Let us comment that in general there are no closed-form expressions in terms of elementary functions for the Lévy -stable distributions. An explicit closed expression for can be conveniently given using the Fourier transform50: , where H is the Heaviside step function and is the complex conjugate of , being the Gamma function. For any value of with , the Lévy -stable distribution is generated numerically33.
For the canonical disorder, the separation between slabs follows a standard normal distribution (zero mean and unit variance).
An ensemble of 135 random waveguides of different disorder realizations have been built for each case: , 3/4, and standard disorder. We measured the reflection amplitude in a frequency window centered at GHz for Lévy disordered waveguides with . For and for conventional disorder, the reflection amplitude was measured in a frequency window centered at GHz. Thus, the experimental histograms of Fig. 2a,b have been obtained from 4590 and 1890 delay times, respectively.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
A. A. F.-M. thanks the hospitality of the Laboratoire d’Acoustique de l’Université du Mans, France, where part of this work was done. J. A. M.-B, gratefully acknowledges to Departamento de Matemática Aplicada e Estatística, Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas e de Computação, Universidade de São Paulo during which this work was completed. J.A.M.-B. was supported by FAPESP (Grant No. 2019/06931-2), Brazil. A. A. F.-M. thanks partial support by RFI Le Mans Acoustique and by the project HYPERMETA funded under the program Étoiles Montantes of the Region Pays de la Loire. V. A. G. acknowledges support by MCIU (Spain) under the Project number PGC2018-094684-B-C22.
Author contributions
L.A.R.-L. performed the numerical simulations. A.A.F.-M. and J.S.-D. conducted and designed the experiments. L.A.R.-L., J.A.M.-B., and V.A.G. analyzed the results and contributed to the preparation of the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-77861-x.
References
- 1.Wigner EP. Lower limit for the energy derivative of the scattering phase shift. Phys. Rev. 1955;147:145–147. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.98.145. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Smith FT. Lifetime matrix in collision theory. Phys. Rev. 1960;119:2098–2098. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.119.2098.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fercher AF, Drexler W, Hitzenberger CK, Lasser T. Optical coherence tomography -principles and applications. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2003;66:239–303. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/66/2/204. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lubatsch A, Frank R. Self-consistent quantum field theory for the characterization of complex random media by short laser pulses. Phys. Rev. Res. 2020;2:013324. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013324. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Anderson PW. Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices. Phys. Rev. 1958;109:1492–1505. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.109.1492. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lagendijk A, van Tiggelen B, Wiersma DS. Fifty years of Anderson localization. Phys. Today. 2009;62:24–29. doi: 10.1063/1.3206091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Genack AZ, Sebbah P, Stoytchev M, van Tiggelen BA. Statistics of wave dynamics in random media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999;82:715–718. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.715. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sebbah P, Legrand O, Genack AZ. Fluctuations in photon local delay time and their relation to phase spectra in random media. Phys. Rev. E. 1999;59:2406–2411. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.59.2406. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chabanov AA, Genack AZ. Statistics of dynamics of localized waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001;87:233903. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.233903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Texier C. Wigner time delay and related concepts: Application to transport in coherent conductors. Phys. E Low. Dimens. Syst. Nano Struct. 2016;82:16–33. doi: 10.1016/j.physe.2015.09.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Texier C, Comtet A. Universality of the Wigner time delay distribution for one-dimensional random potentials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999;82:4220–4223. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4220. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schomerus H, van Bemmel KJH, Beenakker CWJ. Coherent backscattering effect on wave dynamics in a random medium. EPL. 2000;52:518–524. doi: 10.1209/epl/i2000-00468-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Xu F, Wang J. Statistics of Wigner delay time in Anderson disordered systems. Phys. Rev. B. 2011;84:024205. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.024205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ossipov A. Scattering approach to Anderson localization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018;121:076601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.076601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pierrat R, et al. Invariance property of wave scattering through disordered media. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:17765–17770. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1417725111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Blanco S, Fournier R. An invariance property of diffusive random walks. EPL. 2003;61:168–173. doi: 10.1209/epl/i2003-00208-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Savo R, et al. Observation of mean path length invariance in light-scattering media. Science. 2017;358:765–768. doi: 10.1126/science.aan4054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Falceto F, Gopar VA. Conductance through quantum wires with Lévy-type disorder: Universal statistics in anomalous quantum transport. EPL. 2010;92:57014. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/92/57014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Amanatidis I, Kleftogiannis I, Falceto F, Gopar VA. Conductance of one-dimensional quantum wires with anomalous electron wave-function localization. Phys. Rev. B. 2012;85:235450. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.235450. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kleftogiannis I, Amanatidis I, Gopar VA. Conductance through disordered graphene nanoribbons: Standard and anomalous electron localization. Phys. Rev. B. 2013;88:205414. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.205414. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lima JRF, Pereira LFC, Barbosa ALR. Dirac wave transmission in Lévy-disordered systems. Phys. Rev. E. 2019;99:032118. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.99.032118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mantegna RN, Stanley HE. Scaling behaviour in the dynamics of an economic index. Nature. 1995;376:46–49. doi: 10.1038/376046a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Reynolds AM, Ouellette NT. Swarm dynamics may give rise to Lévy flights. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:30515. doi: 10.1038/srep30515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Patel R, Mehta RV. Lévy distribution of time delay in emission of resonantly trapped light in ferrodispersions. J. Nanophoton. 2012;6:069503. doi: 10.1117/1.JNP.6.069503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bouchaud J-P, Georges A. Anomalous diffusion in disordered media: statistical mechanisms, models and physical applications. Phys. Rep. 1990;195:127. doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(90)90099-N. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shlesinger MF, Klafter J, Zumofen G. Above, below and beyond brownian motion. Am. J. Phys. 1999;67:1253–1259. doi: 10.1119/1.19112. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Barkai E, Fleurov V, Klafter J. One-dimensional stochastic Lévy-Lorentz gas. Phys. Rev. E. 2000;61:1164–1169. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.1164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Barthelemy P, Bertolotti J, Wiersma D. A Lévy flight for light. Nature. 2008;453:495–498. doi: 10.1038/nature06948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Solomon TH, Weeks ER, Swinney HL. Observation of anomalous diffusion and Lévy flights in a two-dimensional rotating flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993;71:3975–3978. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.3975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mercadier N, Guerin W, Chevrollier M, Kaiser R. Lévy flights of photons in hot atomic vapours. Nat. Phys. 2009;5:602–605. doi: 10.1038/nphys1286. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rocha EG, et al. Léy flights for light in ordered lasers. Phys. Rev. A. 2020;101:023820. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.023820. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zaburdaev V, Denisov S, Klafter J. Lévy walks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2015;87:483–530. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.483. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Uchaikin, V. V. & Zolotarev, V. M. Chance and Stability. Stable Distributions and Their Applications. (VSP, Utrecht, 1999).
- 34.Garrett C, McCumber D. Propagation of a Gaussian light pulse through an anomalous dispersion medium. Phys. Rev. A. 1970;1:305–313. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.1.305. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dalitz RH, Moorhouse RG. What is a resonance? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A. 1970;318:279. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1970.0145. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chu S, Wong S. Linear pulse propagation in an absorbing medium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982;48:738–741. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.738. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Durand M, Popoff SM, Carminati R, Goetschy A. Optimizing light storage in scattering media with the dwell-time operator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;123:243901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.243901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Anderson PW, Thouless DJ, Abrahams E, Fisher DS. New method for a scaling theory of localization. Phys. Rev. B. 1980;22:3519–3526. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.22.3519. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mello P, Kumar N. Quantum Transport in Mesoscopic Systems: Complexity and Statistical Fluctuation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mello PA. Central-limit theorems on groups. J. Math. Phys. 1986;27:2876–2891. doi: 10.1063/1.527265. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Jayannavar AM, Vijayagovindan GV, Kumar N. Energy dispersive backscattering of electrons from surface resonances of a disordered medium and 1/f noise. Z. Phys. B Condens. Matter. 1989;75:77–79. doi: 10.1007/BF01313570. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Heinrichs J. Invariant embedding treatment of phase randomisation and electrical noise at disordered surfaces. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 1990;2:1559–1568. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/2/6/015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Comtet A, Texier C. On the distribution of the Wigner time delay in one-dimensional disordered systems. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 1997;30:8017–8025. doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/30/23/005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bolton-Heaton CJ, Lambert CJ, Falḱo VI, Prigodin V, Epstein AJ. Distribution of time constants for tunneling through a one-dimensional disordered chain. Phys. Rev. B. 1999;60:10569–10572. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.10569. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Beenakker CWJ. Dynamics of Localization in a Waveguide, 489–508. Netherlands: Springer; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Klyatskin VI, Saichev AI. Statistical and dynamic localization of plane waves in randomly layered media. Sov. Phys. Uspekhi. 1992;35:231–247. doi: 10.1070/PU1992v035n03ABEH002224. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Anantha Ramakrishna S, Kumar N. Imaginary potential as a counter of delay time for wave reflection from a one-dimensional random potential. Phys. Rev. B. 2000;61:3163–3165. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.3163. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Beenakker CWJ, Paasschens JCJ, Brouwer PW. Probability of reflection by a random laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996;76:1368–1371. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.1368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kottos T. Statistics of resonances and delay times in random media: beyond random matrix theory. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 2005;38:10761–10786. doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/38/49/018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Calvo I, Cuchí JC, Esteve JG, Falceto F. Generalized central limit theorem and renormalization group. J. Stat. Phys. 2010;141:409. doi: 10.1007/s10955-010-0065-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




