Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2020 Nov 10;83(11):3332–3337. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.0c00669

Asymmetric Synthesis of Oxygenated Monoterpenoids of Importance for Bark Beetle Ecology

Suresh Ganji 1, Fredric G Svensson 1, C Rikard Unelius 1,*
PMCID: PMC7705961  PMID: 33170693

Abstract

graphic file with name np0c00669_0009.jpg

Herein we report the asymmetric syntheses of a number of oxygenated terpenoids that are of importance in the chemical ecology of bark beetles. These are pinocamphones, isopinocamphones, pinocarvones, and 4-thujanols (= sabinene hydrates). The camphones were synthesized from isopinocampheol, the pinocarvones from β-pinene, and the thujanols from sabinene. The NMR spectroscopic data, specific rotations, and elution orders of their stereoisomers on a chiral GC-phase (β-cyclodextrin) are also reported. This enables facile synthesis of pure compounds for biological activity studies and identification of stereoisomers in mixed natural samples.


The colonization of trees by bark beetles is generally influenced by an intricate release of chemical signals in strict chronological order. The signals recruit conspecifics to a suitable host tree, and later in the colonization, other compounds are produced to convey to conspecifics that this tree is becoming overexploited.1 Thereby competition for food and larvae is avoided. These attractant chemical signals can originate from metabolized monoterpenoids, like for the noxious larger spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus, where cis-verbenol is converted to verbenone, but the pheromones can also be synthesized de novo.2 In recent work with semiochemicals for tree-killing bark beetles we have encountered a number of oxygenated monoterpenoids that are physiologically active (antiattractive, i.e., reduce the effect of aggregation pheromone) in these beetles (Figure 1).3,4

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Absolute configuration of the synthesized oxygenated terpenoids.

We recently published that the production of oxygenated monoterpenoids is related to tree stress and that it might be a signal for a suitable or nonsuitable host for bark beetles.3 Investigations by gas chromatographic electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD) of monoterpenones by us3 and Kalinova et al.5 revealed that both isopinocamphones and pinocamphones elicit antennal responses in I. typographus. There are relatively few syntheses of pinocamphone and isopinocamphone reported. In one report in Chinese, Wang et al. reacted α-pinene with borane to obtain diisopinocampheylborane, which was oxidized to isopinocampheol by sodium perborate to afford isopinocampheol.6 The isopinocampheol was finally oxidized by H2O2 with vanadium phosphorus oxide as catalyst to yield isopinocamphone. Pitínová-Štekrová and co-workers utilized different titanosilicate catalysts to convert α-pinene to obtain campholenic aldehyde.7 Some of these catalysts produced pinocamphone as side-product. In another report, thermolysis of α-pinene epoxide in supercritical anhydrous isopropanol afforded up to ∼25% pinocamphone, but in an inseparable mixture of oxygenated monoterpenoids.8 These syntheses do not yield pure stereoisomers or are tedious and have low yields. For short and convenient synthesis without heating, we developed a simple method using pure isopinocampheol stereoisomers that are commercially available.

Pinocarvone is reported as a pheromone for the southern pine beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis)9 and has been found in the hindguts of male white pine cone beetles, Conophthorus coniperda.10 In the GC-EAD analysis of I. typographus, pinocarvone gave strong antennal responses, indicating biological activity.3 Pinocarvone has been isolated from Eucalyptus oil and has been produced by oxidation of β-pinene with SeO2. In this reaction, myrtenal is formed by a rearrangement, and this byproduct was either overlooked or lost during spinning band distillation.11,12

In previous reports, we reported that one of the two trans-4-thujanol stereoisomers showed strong GC-EAD activity for bark beetles3 and that this (+)-trans-thujanol is a field-active semiochemical for the bark beetle, I. typographus.13 Blazytė-Cereskienė et al. reported that young spruce trees release more 4-thujanol than older trees and that 4-thujanol plays an important role in both host defense and tree choice by bark beetles.14 Thus, 4-thujanol is seemingly an indicator of healthy strong trees which should be avoided and could be of interest in forest protection. Several publications on the synthesis of 4-thujanol have been published, including the biotransformation of α-pinene to cis-4-thujanol using the microorganism Fusarium saloni,15 Baeckström’s synthesis of trans-4-thujanol from 3-thujol,16 Galopin’s synthesis of the trans isomers from methyl vinyl ketone,17 Cheng’s syntheses of cis-thujanol,18,19 and Fanta’s synthesis of trans-thujanol.20 However, all these synthetic procedures involve many steps and/or expensive starting materials, and there are no effective synthetic routes for all possible stereoisomers. In order to develop a short synthesis of all stereoisomers of 4-thujanol for the investigation of GC-EAD activity, herein these were synthesized from commercial sabinene. The absolute configuration of each stereoisomer was unambiguously assigned by the deduction from the original sabinene in combination with NMR spectroscopy and chiral-phase GC-MS analysis.

These compounds are obviously important in bark beetle ecology, and some of them act as indicators of tree health; they are also of interest for managing bark beetle populations. It is well known that the stereochemistry of pheromones and other semiochemicals is often extremely important.2124 Thus, there is a need to develop analytical procedures to be able to use enantioselective gas chromatography to differentiate between the stereoisomers of these semiochemicals in a biological sample, as well as their facile synthesis. We herein report the syntheses, specific rotations, and elution orders on a chiral GC phase (β-cyclodextrin) of pinocamphones, isopinocamphones, pinocarvones, and 4-thujanols (sabinene hydrate).

Results and Discussion

Synthesis of Isopinocamphones and Pinocamphones

Scheme 1 summarizes the syntheses of the four stereoisomers of pinocamphone. The pure enantiomers of isopinocampheol (1 and 2) were separately oxidized with pyridinium dichromate (PDC) to obtain both enantiomers of isopinocamphone in >98% optical purity. The oxidation was improved by adding silica gel to the reaction mixture, which prevents the formation of lumps and tar and in turn leads to higher yields and easier filtration at workup.

Scheme 1. Synthesis of the Four Stereoisomers of Pinocamphone.

Scheme 1

To produce pinocamphones, NaOEt was used to epimerize C-2 of isopinocamphone. The thermodynamic equilibrium seems to be 4:1 in favor of pinocamphone, and thus, 20% of isopinocamphone had to be removed by chromatography to obtain pure pinocamphone (Scheme 1).

Specific Rotation of Isopinocamphones and Pinocamphones

The sign of the specific rotation changed when going from isopinocampheols (1 and 2) to isopinocamphones (3 and 4), but not during epimerization from isopinocamphones to pinocamphones (5 and 6). The specific rotations are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Enantioselective GC-FID and Specific Rotations of Isopinocampheols, Isopinocamphones, and Pinocamphones.
s. no compound tR specific rotation class
1 (1S,2S,3S,5R)-(+)-isopinocampheol   +34 (c 1.0, DCM) isopinocampheols
2 (1R,2R,3R,5S)-(−)-isopinocampheol   –36 (c 1.0, DCM)
3 (1S,2S,5R)-(−)-isopinocamphone 11.69 –11.4 (c 1.0, EtOH) isopinocamphones (IPC)
4 (1R,2R,5S)-(+)-isopinocamphone 11.61 +11.2 (c 1.0, EtOH)
5 (1S,2R,5R)-(−)-pinocamphone 11.37 –20.2 (c 1.0, EtOH) pinocamphones (PC)
6 (1R,2S,5S)-(+)-pinocamphone 11.53 +22.7 (c 1.0, EtOH)

GC Elution Order of Isopinocamphones and Pinocamphones

In the analysis by GC equipped with HP-5MS or DB-5MS columns, the pinocamphones eluted before the isopinocamphones. In the GC analysis using a chiral-phase column (Cyclosil B), (−)-pinocamphone (5) eluted before (+)-pinocamphone (6) and (+)-isopinocamphone (4) before (−)-isopinocamphone (3) (Table 1 and Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Mix of pinocamphones and isopinocamphones separated by enantioselective GC. The temperature program was isothermal 110 °C on a Cyclosil B column.

Synthesis of Pinocarvone Stereoisomers

There are only a few syntheses of pinocarvone published, and usually pinocarvone has been synthesized by oxidation of α-pinene or β-pinene (Scheme 2).25,26 One example is the Crich synthesis of pinocarvone from β-pinene (7) using perfluorooctyl selenic acid, where focus was on the preparation of the catalyst, and the yield was ca. 40%.27 However, a serious drawback with pinene as starting material is the formation of myrtenal, which cannot be removed by silica column chromatography. Here we report a process where each pinocarvone enantiomer was separately synthesized from enantiopure β-pinene isomers (7) by oxidation with SeO2 (Scheme 2). The mixture of pinocarvone and myrtenal was subsequently oxidized with H2O2/NaH2PO4 and NaClO2 to remove the myrtenal in the form of myrtenic acid by silica gel chromatography (see GC-chromatogram, Figure 3). On the enantioselective GC-column phase ()-pinocarvone (9) elutes before (+)-pinocarvone (8) (Figure 4). The 1H NMR spectroscopic data of pinocarvone have been published,28 but here we also provide 13C NMR spectroscopic data.

Scheme 2. Synthesis of Pinocarvones.

Scheme 2

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Gas chromatograms before and after oxidation of myrtenal by NaClO2/H2O2.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

GC elution order of pinocarvone stereoisomers. Separated on GC equipped with a Cyclosil B column. In the chiral analysis (−)-pinocarvone eluted earlier than (+)-pinocarvone. (A) (−)-Pinocarvone (9), (B) (+)-pinocarvone (8), and (C) mix of pinocarvone enantiomers. The temperature program: Initial oven temperature was 40 °C (held for 5 min) increased to 150 °C at 3 °C/min and finally increased to 220 °C at 10 °C/min (held for 5 min at the final temperature).

Specific Rotation of Pinocarvone Stereoisomers

The sign of specific rotation changed when going from pinene to pinocarvone, i.e., (−)-β-pinene yielded (+)-pinocarvone (8) and (+)-β-pinene yielded (−)-pinocarvone (9). The specific rotations were as follows: (+)-pinocarvone (8) [α]23D +30.8 (c 1.0, EtOAc); (−)-pinocarvone (9) [α]23D −29.6 (c 2.0, EtOAc).

Synthesis of 4-Thujanol (Sabinene Hydrate) Stereoisomers

(−)-Sabinene (10) (86% ee) was subjected to a mild permanganate oxidation yielding sabinenediol (11) (Scheme 3). The diol was cleaved using periodate to yield sabina ketone (12). Chirality of the sabina ketone was confirmed by use of specific rotation and a GC column (β-cyclodextrin phase).29 The ketone was reacted with MeLi. The methyl group attacked stereoselectively from the sterically less hindered side of the carbonyl, resulting in a 10:1 excess of cis-forms (13 plus enantiomer 16) over the corresponding trans-forms of thujanol (14 plus enantiomer 15) (i.e., cis-4-thujanol is the major diasteromer formed).

Scheme 3. Synthesis of 4-Thujanol Stereoisomers.

Scheme 3

As the ratio of stereoisomers in the sabinene (10) was (−)-93:(+)-7, it was easy to differentiate the (+)-(1R)- and (−)-(1S)-forms of sabina ketone by enantioselective GC. The reaction with MeLi yielded a mixture of all four 4-thujanol stereoisomers, which could be defined as (+)-trans-(1R,4S)-4-thujanol (15), (−)-trans-(1S,4R)-4-thujanol (14), (+)-cis-(1R,4R)-4-thujanol (16), and (−)-cis-(1S,4S)-4-thujanol (13), in a ratio of 1:9:4:86, by use of the enantioselective GC column.

The NMR spectrum and specific rotation proved that the isomer purchased from Sigma-Aldrich was the (+)-trans-isomer, and the major product could be assigned as (−)-cis-4-thujanol (13), based on the retention of ring configuration in the synthesis sequence, as well as regioselective considerations and reported NMR spectroscopic data.30,31

GC Elution Order of 4-Thujanol Stereoisomers

On the HP-5MS GC column, the trans diastereomers eluted first. On the β-cyclodextrin column the first peak of four synthetic isomers coeluted with the commercial (+)-trans-4-thujanol stereoisomer (15) purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, and the last peak coeluted with the isolated (−)-cis-thujanol (13). The elution order of all isomers was (+)-trans, (−)-trans, (+)-cis, (−)-cis (Figure 5). The elution order is in accordance with those reported by Larkov et al.31 and Marriott et al.32

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Chromatograms of chiral-phase GC of 4-thujanol isomers in the mixture and chromatograms of isolated (+)-trans- and (−)-cis-4-thujanol isomers. The temperature program: Initial oven temp 40 °C (hold for 3 min) and increased to 150 °C at 3 °C/min and finally increased to 250 °C at 15 °C/min. It was kept for 10 min at the final temperature of 250 °C.

Specific Rotation of Sabina Ketone and 4-Thujanol Stereoisomers

It should be noted that (−)-sabinene (10) yields (+)-sabina ketone (12), which is subsequently transformed to thujanols with (−)-cis-thujanol (13) as the major isomer (Scheme 3). The commercial sabinene (apparently from a natural source) has a specific rotation of −73 (c 1.0, EtOH) and −81 (c 1.0, DCM). Moreover, the chemical purity of the commercial sabinene (10) was only 75%, with 25% β-pinene as an impurity and with an ee of 86%. Sabina ketone (12) was obtained in 86% ee and with specific rotations of [α]23D +24 (c 1.0, EtOH) and [α]23D +33.5 (c 1.0, EtOAc) after removal of byproducts (pinene ketones) by chromatography. The (−)-cis-thujanol isomer (13) produced in the last step had, after chromatography, an optical purity of 91% ee and a specific rotation of −40 (c 0.5, DCM). The commercial (+)-trans-4-thujanol (15) (Sigma-Aldrich) had a specific rotation of +29.8 (c 0.5, DCM).

Experimental Section

General Experimental Procedures

Optical rotations were recorded in EtOH, EtOAc, and DCM on a 2019 model Rudolph automatic polarimeter (APIII) manufactured by Rudolph Research Analytical (Hackettstown, NJ, USA). NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 on Bruker 400 and Varian 500 MHz spectrometers. The GC-MS instrument was an Agilent 6890 GC and 5973 mass detector and a Hewlett-Packard with a FID detector (Palo Alto, CA, USA). Helium was used as carrier gas. Two types of columns, a nonpolar column (HP-5MS, film thickness = 0.25 μm; Agilent Technologies 19091S-433) and a chiral-phase capillary column (Cyclosil-B, 30 m × 0.25 μm, i.d. 0.25 mm, J&W Scientific, via Scantech Nordic AB, Jonsered, Sweden), were used. Mass spectra were obtained by electron impact ionization (70 eV). The general gas chromatography temperature program for both columns was as follows: initial temperature 50 °C (hold for 2 min), raised to 200 °C with 10 °C/min (hold for 15 min) (splitless). When a different temperature program was used for resolution of enantiomers (on the Cyclosil-B column), the temperature program is described in the figure legends of the GC chromatograms. The synthesized compounds were purified on silica gel column chromatography using 230–400 mesh ultra pure silica.

Synthesis of the Four Stereoisomers of Pinocamphone (Scheme 1)

Synthesis of (−)-Isopinocamphone (3)

(1S,2S,3S,5R)-2,6,6-Trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]heptan-3-ol [(1S,2S,3S,5R)-(+)-isopinocampheol] (1) (Sigma-Aldrich, Schnelldorf, Germany) (12.32 g, 80.0 mmol, chemical purity 98% and optical purity 95% ee) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (150 mL).32 Silica gel (18 g) and PDC (60 g, 160 mmol) were added, and the mixture was stirred for 3.5 h at RT before leaving it in a fridge overnight. The slurry was diluted with cyclohexane and filtered. The solid material was washed twice with 1:1 cyclohexane/CH2Cl2 (50 mL). The filtrate was concentrated and subjected to MPLC, yielding 87% (10.6 g, 69.7 mmol) of (1S,2S,5R)-2,6,6-trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]heptan-3-one ((1S,2S,5R)-(−)-isopinocamphone) (3). The chemical purity was 99% with 98% ee.

Specific rotation [α]23D = −11.4 (c 1.0, EtOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ (in ppm) 2.68–2.58 (2H, m), 2.54–2.45 (2H, m), 2.15–2.10 (1H, m), 2.08–2.05 (1H, m), 1.42 (1H, br s), 1.33 (3H, s, −CH3), 1.21 (3H, d, −CH3), 0.87 (3H, s, −CH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ (in ppm) 215.3, 51.4, 45.1, 45.0, 39.1, 34.5, 27.2, 27.1, 22.1, 17.0; GC-MS m/z 83 (100%), 69, 55, 95, 41, 81, 97, 67, 152 (M+), 110 (decreasing order of intensity).

(+)-Isopinocamphone (4)

In analogy with the procedure used for the (−)-antipode, (1R,2R,3R,5S)-2,6,6-trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]heptan-3-ol [(1R,2R,3R,5S)-(−)-isopinocampheol] (2) (12.21 g, 79.3 mmol) was oxidized with PDC (60 g, 160 mmol) to yield 75% (9.03 g, 59.4 mmol) (1R,2R,5S)-2,6,6-trimethylbicyclo-[3.1.1]heptan-3-one [(1R,2R,5S)-(+)-isopinocamphone] (4) after column chromatography. [α]23D = +11.2 (c 1.0, EtOH), 98% ee. The NMR data were identical to the data for the (−)-isomer. GC-MS m/z. See other enantiomer.

(−)-Pinocamphone (5)

(1S,2R,5R)-2,6,6-Trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]heptan-3-one. To a solution of (−)-isopinocamphone (3) (3.04 g, 20.0 mmol) dissolved in EtOH (10 mL) was added NaOEt in EtOH (21% w/w, 11 mL, 34 mmol), and the mixture stirred for 24 h at RT. Water (50 mL) and Et2O (50 mL) were added after 24 h, when the 4:1 equilibrium ratio between (−)-pinocamphone (5) and (−)-isopinocamphone (3) had been established. The aqueous phase was extracted with Et2O (2 × 50 mL), and the combined ether phases were washed with 15 mL of water to remove EtOH. After drying over MgSO4, filtration, and evaporation, 15 mL of toluene was added before subsequent evaporation. The removal of water/EtOH by azeotropic distillation with toluene was repeated twice. The clear amber-colored residue was subjected to MPLC, yielding 2.9 g (19.1 mmol) of (1S,2R,5R)-(−)-pinocamphone) (5) as a 95:5 mixture with (1S,2S,5R)-(−)-isopinocamphone (3). [α]23D = −20.2 (c 1.0, EtOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ (in ppm) 2.67–2.59 (2H, m), 2.49 (2H, m), 2.14–2.07 (1H, m), 1.92 (1H, td, J = 6.1 and 2.1 Hz), 1.33 (3H, s, −CH3), 1.16 (1H, d, J = 10.8 Hz), 1.10 (3H, d, J = 7.3 Hz, −CH3), 0.89 (3H, s, −CH3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ (in ppm) 215.7, 46.5, 44.4 (2C), 39.4, 38.2, 29.1, 26.4, 19.8, 15.1; GC-MS m/z 83 (100%), 55, 69, 41, 95, 81, 97, 67, 152 (M+), 53 (decreasing order of intensity).

(+)-Pinocamphone (6)

In analogy with the (−)-antipode, (1R,2R,5S)-2,6,6-trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]heptan-3-one [(1R,2R,5S)-(+)-isopinocamphone, 4) (3.04 g, 20.0 mmol)] was epimerized with NaOEt in EtOH. The yield of (1R,2S,5S)-2,6,6-trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]heptan-3-one ((1R,2S,5S)-(+)-pinocamphone, 6) as a 4:1 mixture with (1R,2R,5S)-(+)-isopinocamphone, 4), after column chromatography, was 95% (2.89 g, 19.0 mmol). [α]23D = +22.7 (c 1.0, EtOH); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ (in ppm) 2.69–2.58 (2H, m), 2.50–2.36 (2H, m), 2.11 (1H, td, J = 5.8 and 2.8 Hz), 1.92 (1H, td, J = 6.1 and 2.2 Hz), 1.33 (3H, s, −CH3), 1.16 (1H, d, J = 10.8 Hz), 1.10 (3H, d, J = 7.3 Hz, −CH3), 0.89 (3H, s, −CH3).; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ (in ppm) 215.7, 46.5, 44.4 (2C), 39.4, 38.2, 29.1, 26.3, 19.8, 15.1; GC-MS m/z identical to the (−)-isomer 5 of pinocamphone (see above).

Synthesis of the Pinocarvone Stereoisomers (Scheme 2)

To a solution of (−)-β-pinene (7) (0.25 g, 1.8 mmol) in DCM (3 mL) was added SeO2 (0.20 g, 1.8 mmol), and the mixture was refluxed for 2.5 h until GC-MS showed complete transformation. The solution was filtered through silica gel (in a Pasteur pipet), and the product washed out of the silica gel with additional aliqouts of DCM. The product was concentrated under reduced pressure at 30 °C to obtain a mixture of pinocarvone and myrtenal. These two compounds were close on TLC and difficult to purify by column chromatography. To the concentrate, MeCN (2 mL), NaH2PO4 (70 mg) in Milli-Q-water (1 mL), and 35% H2O2 (0.2 mL) were added. The solution was stirred for approximately 1 h until the solution became clear. On an ice bath, NaClO2 (0.32 g) in MQ-water (3 mL) was added dropwise, and the mixture was stirred overnight. One spatula of anhydrous Na2SO3 was added, and the mixture was extracted with DCM (3 × 5 mL). After removal of the solvents, the concentrate was purified on silica gel. The combined fractions were concentrated by rotatory low-vacuum evaporation to afford (+)-pinocarvone (8) (yield 60%, 165 mg, 1.1 mmol). The same experimental procedure was followed to produce (−)-pinocarvone (9) from (+)-β-pinene. The chemical purity of (+)-pinocarvone was 95%, and the optical purity was 97% ee.

(+)-Pinocarvone (8)

[α]D23 = +30.8 (c 1.0, EtOAc) and +27.5 (c 1.0, DCM); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ (in ppm) 5.93 (1H, s), 4.98 (1H, s), 2.74 (1H, t, J = 5.9 Hz), 2.69–2.64 (1H, m), 2.63 (1H, d, J = 2.6 Hz), 2.50 (1H, dd, J = 19.3 and 2.7 Hz), 2.18 (1H, dd, J = 5.8 and 3.0 Hz), 1.33 (3H, s, H-8), 1.27 (1H, d, J = 10.5 Hz), 0.78 (3H, s, H-9); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ (in ppm) 200.1, 149.1, 117.5, 48.3, 42.6, 40.9, 38.6, 32.5, 26.1, 21.6; GC-MS tR 9.06 m/z 81 (100%), 108, 53, 107, 135, 79, 41, 77, 150 (M+), 69, 91, 122 (intensity of decreasing order). NMR spectrometry data are in accordance with reported values.16,28

(−)-Pinocarvone (9)

[α]23D = −29.6 (c 2.0, EtOAc); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ (in ppm) 5.94 (1H, s, H-10 a), 4.99 (1H, s. H-10b), 2.74 (1H, t, J = 5.9 Hz), 2.69–2.64 (1H, m), 2.63 (1H, d, J = 2.6 Hz), 2.52 (1H, dd, J = 19.3 and 2.7 Hz), 2.24–2.17 (1H, m), 1.33 (3H, s, H-8), 1.27 (1H, d, J = 10.5 Hz), 0.78 (3H, s, H-9); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ (in ppm) 200.2, 149.1, 117.6, 48.3, 42.6, 40.41, 38.6, 32.5, 26.1, 21.6; GC-MS tR 9.06 m/z 108 (100%), 81, 53, 107, 135, 79, 41, 150 (M+), 69, 91, 122 (intensity of decreasing order).

Synthesis of 4-Thujanol Isomers (Scheme 3)

Synthesis of Sabinenediol (11)

To a solution of (−)-sabinene (10) 86% ee (1 g, 7.4 mmol) in THF (3 mL) was added KMnO4 (2.3 g, 14.6 mmol) in water (4 mL) over a period of 2.5 h. The mixture was stirred for another hour before the precipitate was filtered off. The filtrate was extracted with EtOAc (2 × 50 mL), and the combined organic layers were washed with brine and dried over Na2SO4. The solution was concentrated by rotatory evaporation to yield 875 mg (5.1 mmol) of crude sabinene diol (11) (70% yield). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ (in ppm) 3.55 (2H, app t, J = 11.6 Hz), 2.45 (1H, br s, −OH), 2.26 (1H, br s, −OH), 1.95–1.89 (1H, m), 1.67–1.61 (1H, m), 1.54 (1H, dd, 14.1 and 8.6 Hz), 1.45 (1H, heptet, J = 6.9 Hz), 1.25–1.18 (1H, m), 1.11 (1H, ddd, J = 8.5, 3.6, and 1.4 Hz), 0.98 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz), 0.89 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz), 0.41 (1H, dd, J = 8.3 and 5.3 Hz), 0.24 (1H, dd, J = 5.2 and 3.5 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ (in ppm) 83.5, 68.1, 34.5, 32.5, 32.3, 30.4, 25.5, 20.2, 20.1, 12.9.

Synthesis of Sabina Ketone (12)

To a stirred solution of sabinenediol diastereomers (11) (800 mg, 4.7 mmol) in THF/H2O (1:1, 5 mL) was added NaIO4(3.7 g, 17.3 mmol) in five portions during 30 min at RT. After 4 h, the mixture was diluted with water (20 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (2 × 30 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo to obtain a crude mixture, which was purified on silica gel column chromatography using 10% EtOAc in n-hexane as eluent. The yield was 650 mg (4.7 mmol) of sabina ketone (12, 99% yield, 86% ee, chemical purity 99%). [α]23D = +24.4 (c 1.0, DCM); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (in ppm) 2.14–2.06 (2H, m), 1.97–1.94 (2H, m), 1.63 (1H, dd, J = 8.8 and 2.8 Hz), 1.56 (1H, app quin, J = 6.8 Hz), 1.17 (1H, dd, J = 9.2 and 4.8 Hz), 1.06 (1H, dd, J = 4.8 and 3.2 Hz), 0.98 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz), 0.93 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (in ppm) 214.9, 39.5, 33.7, 33.2, 32.2, 23.6, 19.5, 19.3, 19.1; GC-MS tR 24.00 (5.9%), 24.42 (94.1%) (Figure S29, Supporting Information), m/z 81 (100%), 96, 95, 67, 55, 123, 41, 138 (M+), 109, 110 (decreasing order of intensity).

Synthesis of Sabinene Hydrates (4-Thujanols 1316)

To a solution of sabina ketone 12 (200 mg, 1.4 mmol) in anhydrous Et2O (5 mL) was carefully added MeLi (1.8 mL, 2.8 mmol, 2.0 equiv, 1.6 M in Et2O) at −78 °C. The mixture was stirred at the same temperature for 1 h and another 1 h at RT. The reaction was quenched by the addition of aqueous NH4Cl (20 mL). The mixture was extracted with Et2O (2 × 30 mL), before the organic phase was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to afford a crude mixture (∼91% conversion) of four sabinene hydrates (4-thujanols). The diastereomeric ratio was 90% cis-isomers [(−)-cis-(1S,4S)-4-thujanol (13 plus its enantiomer 16)] and 10% trans-isomers [(−)-trans-(1S,4R)-4-thujanol (14 plus 15)]. The cis- and trans-thujanol diastereomers could be separated by column chromatography on silica gel. Isolated yield of the cis-diastereomers was 150 mg (0.97 mmol). GC-MS: The retention times of the trans-isomers were (19.86, 20.02) and (21.08, 21.26) for the cis-isomers (Figure S29, Supporting Information).

(−)-cis-(1S,4R)-4-Thujanol (13)

[α]D23 = −40 (c 0.5, DCM) (91% ee); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (in ppm) 1.69 (1H, br s, OH), 1.61–1.49 (3H, m), 1.29 (3H, s), 1.31–1.28 (2H, m), 1.01 (1H, dd, J = 8.0 and 3.6 Hz), 0.89 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz), 0.84 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz), 0.62 (1H, dd, J = 5.2 and 3.6 Hz), 0.28 (1H, dd, J = 8.0 and 5.2 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (in ppm) 79.2, 36.0, 33.5, 33.1, 32.5, 27.9, 25.4, 19.5, 19.4, 11.1; GC-MS m/z 71 (100%), 111, 93, 81, 43, 139, 121, 79, 69, 55, 136, 154 (M+) (decreasing order of intensity).

(+)-trans-(1S,4S)-4-Thujanol (15) (from Sigma-Aldrich, Schnelldorf, Germany)

[α]23D = +29.8 (c 0.5, DCM) (99% ee); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (in ppm) 1.88–1.80 (1H, m), 1.58 (1H, dd, J = 12.0 and 8.0 Hz),1.52 (1H, dd, J = 14.0 and 8.4 Hz), 1.48–1.39 (2H, m), 1.29 (3H, s), 1.26 (1H, ddd, J = 16.0,5.6 and 0.3 Hz), 1.07–1.03 (1H, ddd, J = 8.4, 3.6, and 1.2 Hz), 0.96 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz), 0.88 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz), 0.38 (1H, ddd, J = 8.0, 5.2, and 0.8 Hz), 0.20 (1H, dd, J = 5.2 and 3.6 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (in ppm) 80.5, 36.6, 34.6, 34.4, 32.2, 25.9, 24.9, 20.0, 19.9, 13.3; GC-MS m/z 71 (100%), 43, 93, 111, 81, 121, 139, 69, 55, 79, 136, 154 (M+) (decreasing order of intensity).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by two grants from The Carl Trygger Foundation (Grant CTS 13:487 and CTS 14:493 awarded to C.R.U. and S.G.) and the Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden. The authors are thankful to Dr. R. Naidu, SU, Stockholm, for providing 400 MHz NMR data and Dr. J. Wiklander, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, for providing 500 MHz NMR data.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.0c00669.

  • GC chromatograms, 13C NMR and 1H NMR spectra (PDF)

  • GC chromatograms, 13C NMR and 1H NMR spectra (PDF)

Author Present Address

F.G. Svensson: Department of Molecular Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7015, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

np0c00669_si_001.pdf (2.6MB, pdf)
np0c00669_si_002.pdf (1.9MB, pdf)

References

  1. Symonds M. R. E.; Gitau-Clarke C. W. In Advances in Insect Physiology; Tittiger C., Blomquist G. J., Eds.; Elsevier, 2016; Vol. 50, Chapter 5, pp 195–234. [Google Scholar]
  2. Blomquist G. J.; Figueroa-Teran R.; Aw M.; Song M.; Gorzalski A.; Abbott N. L.; Chang E.; Tittiger C. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 40, 699–712. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2010.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Schiebe C.; Unelius C. R.; Ganji S.; Binyameen M.; Birgersson G.; Schlyter F. J. Chem. Ecol. 2019, 45, 474–489. 10.1007/s10886-019-01070-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhao T.; Ganji S.; Schiebe C.; Bohman B.; Weinstein P.; Krokene P.; Borg-Karlson A. K.; Unelius C. R. ISME J. 2019, 13, 1535–1545. 10.1038/s41396-019-0370-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kalinová B.; Brizová R.; Knizek M.; Turcani M.; Hoskovec M. Arthopod-Plant Interact. 2014, 8, 305–316. 10.1007/s11829-014-9310-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang S.-F.; Li Y.-P.; Zhang M.-G. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 1227, 1612–1617. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pitínová-Štekrová M.; Eliášová P.; Weissenberger T.; Shamzhy M.; Musilováa Z.; Čejka J. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018, 8, 4690–4701. 10.1039/C8CY01231H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Anikeev V. I.; Il’inab I. V.; Volchob K. P.; Yermakovaa A.; S N. F. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2010, 52, 71–75. 10.1016/j.supflu.2009.11.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rudinsky J. A.; Morgan M. E.; Libbey L. M.; Putnam T. B. Environ. Entomol. 1974, 3, 90–98. 10.1093/ee/3.1.90. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Birgersson G.; Debarr G. L.; de Groot P.; Dalusky M. J.; Pierce H. D. Jr.; Borden J. H.; Meyer H.; Francke W.; Espelie K. E.; Berisford C. W. J. Chem. Ecol. 1995, 21, 143–167. 10.1007/BF02036648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Whittaker D.; Banthorpe D. V. Chem. Rev. 1972, 72, 305–313. 10.1021/cr60278a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hartshorn M. P.; Wallis A. F. A. J. Chem. Soc. 1964, 0, 5254–5260. 10.1039/JR9640005254. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jirošová A.; Kalinová B.; Modlinger R.; Jakuš R.; Unelius C. R.; M Blaženec M.; Schlyter F.. Submitted, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Blazyte-Cereskiene L.; Apsegaite V.; Radziute S.; Mozuraitis R.; Buda V.; Peciulyte D. Ann. For. Sci. 2016, 73, 247–256. 10.1007/s13595-015-0494-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cecati F. M.; Magallanes-Noguera C.; Tonn C. E.; Ardanaz C. E.; Kurina-Sanz M. Process Biochem. 2018, 64, 93–102. 10.1016/j.procbio.2017.09.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Baeckstrom P.; Koutek B.; Saman D.; Vrkoc J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1996, 4, 419–421. 10.1016/0968-0896(96)00020-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Galopin C. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5589–5591. 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)01081-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cheng D.; Kreethadumrongdat T.; Cohen T. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2121–2123. 10.1021/ol016086y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cheng D.; Knox K. R.; Cohen T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 412–413. 10.1021/ja993325s. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fanta W. I.; Erman W. F. J. Org. Chem. 1968, 33, 1656–1658. 10.1021/jo01268a081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Witzgall P.; Bengtsson M.; Unelius C. R.; Lofqvist J. J. Chem. Ecol. 1993, 19, 1917–1928. 10.1007/BF00983796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Unelius C. R.; El-Sayed A. M.; Twidle A.; Bunn B.; Zaviezo T.; Flores M. F.; Bell V.; Bergmann J. J. Chem. Ecol. 2011, 37, 166–172. 10.1007/s10886-010-9904-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Witzgall P.; Backman A. C.; Svensson M.; Bengtsson M.; Unelius C. R.; Vrkoc J.; Kirsch P. A.; Ioriatti C.; Lofqvist J. J. Appl. Entomol. 1996, 120, 611–614. 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1996.tb01659.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Löfqvist J. In Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction; Payne T. L., Birch M. C., Kennedy E. J., Eds.; Oxford Univ. Press, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chelucci G.; Saba A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 2575–2578. 10.1016/S0957-4166(98)00279-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Malkov A. V.; Baxendale I. R.; Bella M.; Langer V.; Fawcett J.; Russell D. R.; Mansfield D. J.; Valko M.; Kocovsky P. Organometallics 2001, 20, 673–690. 10.1021/om000850n. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Crich D.; Zou Y. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 775–777. 10.1021/ol036501h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Abraham R. J.; Cooper M. A.; Indyk H.; Siverns T. M.; Whittake D. Org. Magn. Reson. 1973, 5, 373–377. 10.1002/mrc.1270050806. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Barberis M.; Perez-Prieto J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 6683–6685. 10.1016/S0040-4039(03)01629-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Krause S. T.; Kollner T. G.; Asbach J.; Degenhardt J. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2013, 529, 112–121. 10.1016/j.abb.2012.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Larkov O.; Dunkelblum E.; Zada A.; Lewinsohn E.; Freiman L.; Dudai N.; Ravid U. Flavour Fragrance J. 2005, 20, 109–114. 10.1002/ffj.1386. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Marriott P. J.; Shellie R.; Cornwell C. J. Chromatogr A 2001, 936, 1–22. 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)01314-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

np0c00669_si_001.pdf (2.6MB, pdf)
np0c00669_si_002.pdf (1.9MB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of Natural Products are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES