Skip to main content
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2019 Jul 16;4(2):2574–2575. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1640089

Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of Chenopodium sp. (Caryophyllales: Chenopodiaceae)

Luxi Yang a,b, Qiang Li a,b,c,✉,*, Gang Zhao a,b,c,✉,*
PMCID: PMC7706533  PMID: 33365632

Abstract

In this study, the complete chloroplast genome of Chenopodium sp. were sequenced and annotated. The complete chloroplast genome of Chenopodium sp. was composed of circular DNA molecules with a total length of 152,068 bp. The base composition of this chloroplast genome is as follows: A (31.16%), T (31.58%), G (18.27%), and C (18.99%). The chloroplast genome contains 84 protein-coding genes, 8 ribosomal RNA genes (rRNA), and 37 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes. The taxonomic status of the Chenopodium sp. chloroplast genome exhibits a closest relationship with Chenopodium quinoa.

Keywords: Chenopodium, chloroplast genome, phylogenetic analysis


Chenopodium (Caryophyllales: Chenopodiaceae) is a genus of terrestrial plant with hundreds of species described. Chenopodium spp. are widely distributed in the world and have strong environmental adaptabilities (Zou et al. 2017). They are distributed throughout the forests, highlands, and plateaus (Bazile et al. 2016). Some species from the genus have attracted international attention because of their high nutritional value (Abugoch James 2009), such as Quinoa, Chenopodium formosanum, and so on. These species contain an excellent balance of essential amino acids, carbohydrates, lipids, minerals, and vitamins (Nowak et al. 2016). Quinoa is considered to be an important crop in the genus Chenopodium to improve world food security (Vega-Gálvez et al. 2010). In addition, some bioactive ingredients, such as flavonoids, volatile components, phenolic acid, and phytoecdysteroids, extracted from quinoa and other Chenopodium species showed antimicrobial and antioxidant activities (Tang and Tsao 2017). The chloroplast genome of Chenopodium sp. reported here will promote further understanding of the genetics, evolution, and taxonomy of this important terrestrial plant.

The specimen (Chenopodium sp.) was obtained from Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan, China (102.52 E; 27.38 N) and was stored in Chengdu University (No. Chesp_1). The total genomic DNA of Chenopodium sp. was extracted using the CTAB method. A Gel Extraction Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA) was used to purify the extracted genomic DNA. The purified genomic DNA was stored in the sequencing company (Biomarker Technologies, Beijing, China). Sequencing libraries were constructed with purified DNA following the instructions of NEBNext® Ultra™ II DNA Library Prep Kit (NEB, Beijing, China). Whole genomic sequencing was performed by the Illumina HiSeq 2500 Platform (Illumina, SanDiego, CA, USA). The obtained raw data first passed through a series of quality control steps to obtain clean reads. The chloroplast genome of Chenopodium sp. was de novo assembled using the SPAdes 3.9.0 software (Bankevich et al. 2012). The MITObim V1.9 software (Oslo, Norway) (Hahn et al. 2013) was used to fill gaps among contigs. The complete chloroplast genome was annotated using the Geseq (Tillich et al. 2017), combined with manual corrections. tRNA genes were predicted using tRNAscan-SE v1.3.1 (Lowe and Chan 2016).

The total length of Chenopodium sp. chloroplast genome is 152,068 bp. This chloroplast genome was submitted to GenBank database under accession No. MN031136. The chloroplast genome contains 84 protein-coding genes, 8 ribosomal RNA genes (rRNA), and 37 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes. The base composition of this mitochondrial genome is as follows: A (31.16%), T (31.58%), G (18.27%), and C (18.99%).

To validate the phylogenetic position of Chenopodium sp., we constructed the phylogenetic trees of 11 closely related species based on the nucleotide sequences of the chloroplast genome. Bayesian inference (BI) phylogenetic methods were used to construct phylogenetic trees with MrBayes v3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012). Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) were calculated to assess node support. As shown in the phylogenetic tree (Figure 1), the taxonomic status of the Chenopodium sp. exhibits a closest relationship with C. quinoa (Hong et al. 2017).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Molecular phylogenies of 11 species based on Bayesian inference analysis of the combined chloroplast gene set. Node support values are Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP). Chloroplast genome accession numbers used in this phylogeny analysis: Chenopodium album (NC_034950); Chenopodium quinoa (NC_034949); Haloxylon ammodendron (NC_027668); Haloxylon persicum (NC_027669); Salicornia bigelovii (NC_027226); Salicornia brachiata (NC_027224); Salicornia europaea (NC_027225); Spinacia oleracea (NC_002202); Fagopyrum luojishanense (NC_037706); Talinum paniculatum (NC_037748).

Disclosure statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

  1. Abugoch James LE. 2009. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): composition, chemistry, nutritional, and functional properties. Adv Food Nutr Res. 58:1–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, et al. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 19:455–477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bazile D, Jacobsen SE, Verniau A. 2016. The global expansion of quinoa: trends and limits. Front Plant Sci. 97:622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hahn C, Bachmann L, Chevreux B. 2013. Reconstructing mitochondrial genomes directly from genomic next-generation sequencing reads-a baiting and iterative mapping approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:e129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hong SY, Cheon KS, Yoo KO, Lee HO, Cho KS, Suh JT, Kim SJ, Nam JH, Sohn HB, Kim YH. 2017. Complete chloroplast genome sequences and comparative analysis of Chenopodium quinoa and C. album. Front Plant Sci. 8:1696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lowe TM, Chan PP. 2016. tRNAscan-SE On-line: integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 44:W54–W57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nowak V, Du J, Charrondière UR. 2016. Assessment of the nutritional composition of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Chem. 193:47–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 61:539–542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tang Y, Tsao R. 2017. Phytochemicals in quinoa and amaranth grains and their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and potential health beneficial effects: a review. Mol Nutr Food Res. 61:1600767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tillich M, Lehwark P, Pellizzer T, Ulbricht-Jones ES, Fischer A, Bock R, Greiner S. 2017. GeSeq-versatile and accurate annotation of organelle genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 45:W6–W11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vega-Gálvez A, Miranda M, Vergara J, Uribe E, Puente L, Martínez EA. 2010. Nutrition facts and functional potential of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.), an ancient Andean grain: a review. J Sci Food Agric. 90:2541–2547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zou C, Chen A, Xiao L, Muller HM, Ache P, Haberer G, Zhang M, Jia W, Deng P, Huang R, et al. 2017. A high-quality genome assembly of quinoa provides insights into the molecular basis of salt bladder-based salinity tolerance and the exceptional nutritional value. Cell Res. 27:1327–1340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES