Skip to main content
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2019 Jul 30;4(2):2775–2776. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1644231

Complete plastid genome of Gentiana trichotoma (Gentianaceae) and phylogenetic analysis

Shanshan Sun 1, Hui Wang 1, Pengcheng Fu 1,
PMCID: PMC7706570  PMID: 33365723

Abstract

The complete plastid genome of Gentiana trichotoma was determined and analyzed in this work. It had a circular-mapping molecular with the length of 144,759 bp, has similar gene composition with G. section Cruciata but contains 10 more genes than G. section Kudoa. Phylogenetic analysis showed that G. trichotoma clustered together with section Kudoa rather than section Cruciata. The plastome provided in this work would be useful for elucidation of Gentiana evolution.

Keywords: Gentiana trichotoma, phylogenetic analysis, plastome


As a big genus containing 15 sections (Ho and Liu 2001), Gentiana plants are typically alpine and important parts of alpine shrub and meadow. Gentiana trichotoma Kusnezow, belonging to section Frigidae Kusnezow, is endemic to the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (Ho and Liu 2001). However, there has been no genomic studies in section Frigidae.

Herein, we reported and characterized the complete G. trichotoma platome (MN089577). One G. trichotoma individual (specimen number: Fu2016163-6) was collected from Daocheng, Sichuan Province of China (29°27′09″N, 100°13′27″E) and its voucher specimens was deposited in the herbarium of School of Life Science, Luoyang Normal University. The fragmented genomic DNA was sequenced using Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (Novogene, Tianjing, China), yielding approximately 5 Gb of 150-bp paired-end. The plastome was de novo assembled in NOVOPlasty 2.6.1 (Dierckxsens et al. 2016) and then annotated in GeSeq (Tillich et al. 2017) using the default parameters. Comparative analysis was conducted in mVISTA (Frazer et al. 2004) with G. straminea (Ni et al. 2016) and G. lawrencei var. farreri (Fu et al. 2016) which represents the only two plastome-available Gentiana sections, Cruciata Gaudin, and Kudoa (Masamune) Satake & Toyokuni ex Toyokuni, respectively. Shared protein-coding genes in plastomes of available Gentiana species were extracted and concatenated, then aligned using MAFFT (Katoh et al. 2002). The ML phylogeny was performed with IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al. 2015) in PhyloSuite (Zhang et al. 2018) with 1000 replicates. Swertia mussotii (KC875852) and S. verticillifolia (MF795137) were served as the outgroups.

The complete G. trichotoma platome is a circular-mapping molecule with the length of 144,759 bp. The LSC, IR, and SSC regions were 77,430, 25,162, and 17,005 bp, respectively. The overall GC content of the platome was 37.8%. A total of 130 genes were annotated, containing 88 protein-coding genes, 34 tRNA genes, and 8 rRNA genes. Comparison analysis indicated that platome of G. trichotoma has similar gene composition with section Cruciata (Ni et al. 2016; Zhou et al. 2018), with hotspots locating at intergenic regions such as trnK-UUUrps16, atpHatpI, petNtrnD, and trnL-UAGccsA. However, gene loss was not detected in G. trichotoma, which is different with section Kudoa which has almost lost 10 ndh genes (Sun et al. 2018). Phylogenetic analysis showed that G. trichotoma was clustered together with section Kudoa rather than section Cruciata (Figure 1), which is consistent with the previous study (Favre et al. 2016). Gentiana stipitata belonging to section Kudoa was clustered with section Cruciata, which is consistent with the previous study (Sun et al. 2018), indicating that more taxa should be involved for further study. The determination of the G. trichotoma platome sequences provided new molecular data to illuminate the Gentiana evolution.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Phylogenetic tree (maximum likelihood) based on protein-coding genes of Gentiana plastomes. The asterisks along the branches mean 100% bootstrap supports based on 1000 replicates. The underline located in Genbank accession numbers indicates newly determined plastid genomes.

Disclosure statement

There are no conflicts of interest for all the authors including the implementation of research experiments and writing this article.

References

  1. Dierckxsens N, Mardulyn P, Smits G. 2016. NOVOPlasty: de novo assembly of organelle genomes from whole genome data. Nucleic Acids Res. 45:e18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Favre A, Michalak I, Chen CH, Wang JC, Pringle JS, Matuszak S, Sun H, Yuan YM, Struwe L, Muellner-riehl A. 2016. Out-of-Tibet: the spatio-temporal evolution of Gentiana (Gentianaceae). J Biogeogr. 43:1967–1978. [Google Scholar]
  3. Frazer KA, Pachter L, Poliakov A, Rubin EM, Dubchak I. 2004. VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:W273–W279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fu PC, Zhang YZ, Geng HM, Chen SL. 2016. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Gentiana lawrencei var. farreri (Gentianaceae) and comparative analysis with its congeneric species. PeerJ. 4:e2540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ho TN, Liu SW. 2001. A worldwide monograph of Gentiana. Beijing: Science Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. 2002. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:3059–3066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 32:268–274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ni L, Zhao Z, Xu H, Chen S, Dorje G. 2016. Chloroplast genome structures in Gentiana (Gentianaceae), based on three medicinal alpine plants used in Tibetan herbal medicine. Curr Genet. 63:241–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sun SS, Fu PC, Zhou XJ, Cheng YW, Zhang FQ, Chen SL, Gao QB. 2018. The complete plastome sequences of seven species in Gentiana sect. Kudoa (Gentianaceae): Insights into plastid gene loss and molecular evolution. Front Plant Sci. 9:493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tillich M, Lehwark P, Pellizzer T, Ulbricht-Jones ES, Fischer A, Bock R, Greiner S. 2017. GeSeq–versatile and accurate annotation of organelle genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 45:W6–W11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang D, Gao F, Li WX, Jakovlić I, Zou H, Zhang J, Wang GT. 2018. PhyloSuite: an integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. bioRxiv. 20 DOI: 10.1101/489088 [accessed 2018 Dec 7]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhou T, Wang J, Jia Y, Li W, Xu F, Wang X. 2018. Comparative chloroplast genome analyses of species in Gentiana section Cruciata (Gentianaceae) and the development of authentication markers. IJMS. 19:1962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES