Skip to main content
Emerging Infectious Diseases logoLink to Emerging Infectious Diseases
. 2020 Dec;26(12):3096–3099. doi: 10.3201/eid2612.200708

Autochthonous Ratborne Seoul Virus Infection in Woman with Acute Kidney Injury

Jörg Hofmann 1,2,3,4,5,6,, Elisa Heuser 1,2,3,4,5,6, Sabrina Weiss 1,2,3,4,5,6, Beate Tenner 1,2,3,4,5,6, Konrad Schoppmeyer 1,2,3,4,5,6, Jutta Esser 1,2,3,4,5,6, Christiane Klier 1,2,3,4,5,6, Stephan Drewes 1,2,3,4,5,6, Rainer G Ulrich 1,2,3,4,5,6, Detlev H Kruger 1,2,3,4,5,6
PMCID: PMC7706977  PMID: 33219808

Abstract

Outside Asia, Seoul virus (SEOV) is an underestimated pathogen. In Germany, autochthonous SEOV-associated hantavirus disease has not been unequivocally diagnosed. We found clinical and molecular evidence for SEOV infection in a young woman; her pet rat was the source of infection.

Keywords: Seoul virus, hantavirus, renal failure, respiratory distress, zoonoses, hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, Germany, viruses, rats


Hantavirus infections cause febrile and often life-threatening zoonoses known as hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome and hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome. Human pathogenic hantavirus species usually are carried by specific rodent reservoirs, which shed infectious virus in their excreta (1).

Seoul virus (SEOV), a species within the genus Orthohantavirus, is hosted by Norway or brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) and other Rattus species as main reservoir. SEOV-associated hantavirus disease is characterized by fever, acute kidney injury, often hepatitis and gastroenteritis, associated with transient thrombocytopenia and proteinuria (2,3). Most clinical cases are known to originate from China and South Korea; however, SEOV infection can occur worldwide because of the global distribution of Norway rats in the wild. Moreover, human infection has been described from contact with breeder rats (laboratory rats and laboratory rat–derived tissue cultures), pet rats, and feeder rats (36).

SEOV-caused hantavirus disease, especially in areas outside Asia to which it is not endemic, is often misdiagnosed, perhaps because of its sometimes mild/atypical clinical presentation and healthcare providers’ low clinical awareness (2,3). A lack of appropriate routine diagnostic tools also complicate the correct diagnosis. SEOV nucleocapsid protein shares a high antigenic similarity to related orthohantaviruses, such as Hantaan virus (HTNV) and Dobrava-Belgrade virus (DOBV), and is not always included in commercial assays (1,7).

Therefore, the use of molecular methods is the best way to unequivocally prove SEOV infections in Europe. Molecular evidence for SEOV infection has been found in patients from France and the Netherlands (6,8). Molecularly proven SEOV hantavirus disease in a German patient was reported in 2018, but the infection probably was acquired in Indonesia (7). Except for this travel-associated infection, neither SEOV-specific antibodies nor SEOV RNA had been detected in humans in Germany.

In October 2019, an 18-year-old woman was admitted to the intensive care unit of a hospital in Nordhorn in northwestern Germany with high fever and in critical condition. During the clinical course of her illness, acute kidney injury, gastroenteritis, and hepatopathy developed. Thrombocytes were lowest at day 3 and normal from day 6 on. Leukocytosis was evident during days 6–8, C-reactive protein as an inflammation parameter was above normal, peaked on day 2, and then decreased continuously until day 12. Serum creatinine and urea were elevated, and glomerular filtration rate was reduced with most critical values of all 3 parameters on day 8. We also detected proteinuria. The >3-fold increase in serum creatinine concentration from day 1 to day 8 is consistent with an acute kidney injury severity level 3 in the 3-stage KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) classification (9). These parameters of kidney function reached normal or nearly normal levels on day 12. Liver enzymes were elevated during the entire period and peaked on day 3 (Table). After receiving antimicrobial treatment and treatment for her symptoms, the patient was discharged from the hospital on day 13 in largely normal condition.

Table. Biochemical parameters of the patient with Seoul virus during hospitalization, Germany, 2018*.

Parameter (reference range) Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 6 Day 7 Day 8 Day 9 Day 11 Day 12
Platelets (150–400/μL) 183 93 73 89 167 185 334 379 515 537
Leukocytes (4–10/μL) 3.4 4.7 4.4 5.5 10.4 10.8 10.1 9.1 9.4 8.6
CRP (0–0.5 mg/dL) 4.7 12.4 11.5 7.8 6.2 4.8 4.1 3.6 1.4 0.9
Serum creatinine (0.5–0.9 mg/dL) 0.92 1.42 1.93 1.81 2.27 2.72 2.93 2.33 1.18 1.16
Serum urea (16.6–48.5 mg/dL) ND 41.5 ND 55.2 63.3 67.5 67.8 53.0 17.9 17.0
GFR (>89 mL/min) 91 54 37 40 31 25 22 30 67 69
Protein in urine (0 mg/dL) ND ND 75 ND ND 75 75 ND ND
γGT (6–42 U/L) 67 202 206 172 187 177 159 141 110 156
ALT (10–35 U/L) 28 164 233 140 117 96 67 55 39 54

*ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CRP, C-reactive protein; γGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; –, negative; ND, not determined.

Serologic diagnostic approaches were based on recomLine HantaPlus IgG and IgM immunoblot assays (Mikrogen GmbH, https://www.mikrogen.de). The recomLine IgM blot showed strong reactivity to DOBV, HTNV, and SEOV nucleocapsid antigens, and in the IgG blot, we found a single weak reactivity to HTNV. A follow-up sample drawn 2 months after discharge revealed comparable band intensities in the IgM blot. The IgG blot showed a strong HTNV band but no DOBV or SEOV reactivities. However, neither DOBV nor HTNV are prevalent in the patient’s residential area, and she reported not traveling.

We conducted molecular virus typing. A serum sample collected on day 5 of hospitalization was tested by the pan-hanta reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) addressing a 412-nt region of the viral large (L) segment (10). The identified nucleotide sequence demonstrated SEOV infection.

The patient reported that she kept Norway rats as pets in her flat. RT-PCR investigation of lung tissue of 1 of these rats yielded an L segment sequence identical to the patient-derived sequence (Figure). A subsequent small (S) segment RT-PCR enabled amplification of a 673-nt sequence from both the patient and the pet rat. Sequence alignment showed only a single silent nucleotide exchange. The analyzed S segment sequences exhibited the highest similarity to breeder-rat derived SEOV strains from the Netherlands and United Kingdom (Figure). The identities of the patient- and pet rat-derived sequences support the zoonotic transmission of the virus to the woman.

Figure.

Figure

Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the amplified large (L) and small (S) segment regions of human and rat origin from Nordhorn/Germany (strains Nordhorn GER Hu and Nordhorn GER Rn, designated in bold). The consensus tree is based on a 412-nt region of the L segment (A) and a 673-nt region of the S segment (B). Alignments were constructed with Bioedit software package version7.2.5) (https://bioedit.software.informer.com) using the Clustal W Multiple Alignment algorithm. The best fitting substitution model was determined with jModeltest version 2.1.10 (https://github.com/ddarriba/jmodeltest2). Trees were reconstructed with MrBayes version 3.2.6 (http://www.mrbayes.net) and FasttreeMP version 2.1.10 (http://microbesonline.org/fasttree) executed on the CIPRES portal (https://www.phylo.org) according to maximum-likelihood and Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms. The consensus tree is based on Bayesian analyses with 2 × 106 generations, a burn-in phase of 25%, and the Hasegawa-Kishono-Yano substitution model with gamma distribution. Bootstrap values were transferred to the Bayesian tree behind posterior probabilities only if they were >50% and if branches of both trees were consistent. Hantaan virus was used as outgroup. The L and S segment sequences were deposited in GenBank under accession nos. MT123530–33. At the end of the strain names the country of origin is given: BEL, Belgium; CHN, China; FRA, France; GBR, Great Britain; GER, Germany; INA, Indonesia; KOR, South Korea; NED, the Netherlands; USA, United States. Scale bars indicate nucleotide substitutions per site.

This case illustrates the importance of clinical awareness for SEOV infection after contact with rats. Along with this human case, we report a molecularly proven SEOV infection in a pet rat in Germany. More information regarding the SEOV prevalence in domestic and wild rat populations in Germany is needed to assess the risk for infection in the general public, pet rat owners, and breeder-rat handlers.

Acknowledgments

We thank J. Dreesman and M. Oskamp for their support in patient contact. We gratefully acknowledge the expert technical assistance of C. Stephan, S. Schwarz, and D. Kaufmann.

Work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Public Health via Robert Koch-Institute (grant no 1369-382/435, 1362-924/980), by Deutsches Zentrum, für Infektionsforschung (area “Emerging Infections“), and the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung through the Research Network Zoonotic Infections (project 01KI1721A, C, D).

Biography

Dr. Hofmann is the chair of the National Consultation Laboratory for Hantaviruses, Institute of Virology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany. His primary research interest is human infections with viral pathogens.

Footnotes

Suggested citation for this article: Hofmann J, Heuser E, Weiss S, Tenner B, Schoppmeyer K, Esser, J, et al. Autochthonous ratborne Seoul virus infection in woman with acute kidney injury. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Dec [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2612.200708

1

These authors contributed equally to this article.

2

Current affiliation: Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.

References

  • 1.Kruger DH, Figueiredo LT, Song JW, Klempa B. Hantaviruses—globally emerging pathogens. J Clin Virol. 2015;64:128–36. 10.1016/j.jcv.2014.08.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lee HW. Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in Korea. Rev Infect Dis. 1989;11(Suppl 4):S864–76. 10.1093/clinids/11.Supplement_4.S864 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Clement J, LeDuc JW, Lloyd G, Reynes JM, McElhinney L, Van Ranst M, et al. Wild rats, laboratory rats, pet rats: global Seoul hantavirus disease revisited. Viruses. 2019;11:E652. 10.3390/v11070652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Childs JE, Klein SL, Glass GE. A case study of two rodent-borne viruses: not always the same old suspects. Front Ecol Evol. 2019;7:35. 10.3389/fevo.2019.00035 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McElhinney L, Fooks AR, Featherstone C, Smith R, Morgan D. Hantavirus (Seoul virus) in pet rats: a zoonotic viral threat. Vet Rec. 2016;178:171–2. 10.1136/vr.i817 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Reynes JM, Carli D, Bour JB, Boudjeltia S, Dewilde A, Gerbier G, et al. Seoul virus infection in humans, France, 2014–2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:973–7. 10.3201/eid2306.160927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hofmann J, Weiss S, Kuhns M, Zinke A, Heinsberger H, Kruger DH. Importation of human Seoul virus infection to Germany from Indonesia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:1099–102. 10.3201/eid2406.172044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Swanink C, Reimerink J, Gisolf J, de Vries A, Claassen M, Martens L, et al. Autochthonous human case of Seoul virus infection, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:2158–63. 10.3201/eid2412.180229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Weiss R, Meersch M, Pavenstädt HJ, Zarbock A. Acute kidney injury. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019;116:833–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Klempa B, Fichet-Calvet E, Lecompte E, Auste B, Aniskin V, Meisel H, et al. Hantavirus in African wood mouse, Guinea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:838–40. 10.3201/eid1205.051487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emerging Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

RESOURCES