Skip to main content
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2019 Sep 20;4(2):3151–3152. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1668308

The Complete mitochondrial genome of Marmota vancouverensis (Vancouver Island Marmot)

Zhaonan Hao 1,, Yi Cao 1
PMCID: PMC7707224  PMID: 33365894

Abstract

Marmota vancouverensis, the only uniquely Canadian marmot, has been listed on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species. The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of M. vancouverensis (Vancouver marmot) is presented here firstly, sequenced by next-generation sequencing (NGS). The Vancouver marmot mitogenome is 16,435 bp long, contains 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), two rRNA genes (12S rRNA and 16S rRNA), 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes, and one control region (D-loop). The complete mitochondrial genome sequence provided here could help in study of ecological and evolutionary research of Marmota and conservation genetics of M. vancouverensis.

Keywords: Marmota vancouverensis, mitochondrial genome, protein-coding genes, phylogenetic


The Vancouver Island marmot is the only one species of marmot only found on Vancouver Island, which is on the top20 list of Threatened Small Mammals of IUCN (Roach 2017). It has been showed that effects of deforestation and habitat fragmentation, the variety of environments (Cardini et al. 2007) and predation pressure, Alle effect (Brashares et al. 2010) are part of population decline (has declinded by 80–90% since the 1980s). To know more about the biological diversity of this species and protect them, more genetic analyses and other detailed morphological studies are needed. Based on this purpose, we assembled the mitochondrial genome of M. vancouverensis.

The raw data of whole genome sequencing from Vancouver Island marmot’s liver(Accession no.SAMN09425912, specimen voucher RANI-1049, collected on Vancouver island, British Columbia 49°40′N125°50′W, stored in a freezer in Abbotsford, Canada), provided by Ministry of Agriculture and Lands, Animal Health Center, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada, sequenced using HiSeq X Ten, has been used. The raw reads (SRR7403958) were trimmed using Trimmomatic v0.4.0 (Bolger et al. 2014), then assembled and annotated with NOVOPlasty v2.7.2 (Dierckxsens et al. 2016) and MITOS2 (Bernt et al. 2013), respectively. We used Marmota himalayana (NC_018367.1) as the reference during assembly. Finally, we get 16,435 bp long, double-stranded circular DNA (GenBank Accession No. MK859897). This mitogenome of M. vancouverensis includes 13 protein-coding genes, two ribosomal RNA genes (12S rRNA and 16S rRNA), 22 tRNA genes, and one control region (D-loop) identified by sequence homology (identity 91.24%, coverage 97.8% vs M. himalayana; four conserved sequences are totoally identical to M. himalayana’s (Chao et al. 2014)) . The contents of A, T, G, and C are 32.24%, 31.76%, 12.58%, and 23.42%. GC contents are 36.00%. All of the PCGs use complete (ATG, ATA) start codon and among them, ten of PCGs have complete stop codon (TAA, TAG, AGA), which also proves the integrity of our assembly. The lengths of 12S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes are 971 and 1,562 bp, respectively. The length of 22 tRNA genes ranges from 59 bp (tRNA-Ser) to 74 bp (tRNA-Leu). The D-loop is 999 bp and lies between the tRNA-Phe and tRNA-Pro.

Phylogenetic analysis of 15 mitogenomes using RAxML v8.2.7(Stamatakis 2014). Neodon Irene was used as outgroup. As it turns out that M. vancouverensis is colsest to Marmota himalayana (Figure 1). The mitogenome of M. vancouverensis provides useful resources to study the phylogeny and evolution of marmots, as well as protection.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Phylogenetic tree constructed with M. vancouverensis and 14 other species mitogenomes. It was constructed based on the alignment of MUSCLE v3.8.425 (Edgar 2004). The bootstrap support values are generated using 100 replications.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest and are alone responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

References

  1. Bernt M, Donath A, J Hling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF. 2013. MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 69:313–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 30:2114–2120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brashares JS, Werner JR, Sinclair ARE. 2010. Social ‘meltdown’in the demise of an island endemic: Allee effects and the Vancouver Island marmot. J Anim Ecol. 79:965–973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cardini A, Thorington RW Jr, Polly PD. 2007. Evolutionary acceleration in the most endangered mammal of Canada: speciation and divergence in the Vancouver Island marmot (Rodentia, Sciuridae). J Evol Biol. 20:1833–1846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chao QJ, Li YD, Geng XX, Zhang L, Dai X, Zhang X, Li J, Zhang HJ. 2014. Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Marmota himalayana (Rodentia: Sciuridae) and phylogenetic analysis within Rodentia. Genet Mol Res. 13:2739–2751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dierckxsens N, Mardulyn P, Smits G. 2016. NOVOPlasty: de novo assembly of organelle genomes from whole genome data. Nucleic Acids Res. 45:e18–e18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792–1797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Roach N. 2017. Marmota vancouverensis The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2017e.T12828A22259184. 10.2305/IUCN. [DOI]
  9. Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 30:1312–1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES