Skip to main content
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2019 Oct 1;4(2):3307–3308. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1673246

Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of medicinal tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia)

Hailong Liu a, Maolin Geng b,c, Yufeng Qin a, Yufei Xiao a, Mimi Li b,c,
PMCID: PMC7707254  PMID: 33365968

Abstract

Melaleuca alternifolia is commonly known as the medicinal tea tree. The complete chloroplast (cp) genome sequence is 160,104 bp in length, with a quantitative molecule structure comprising two copies of inverted repeats (IRa and IRb) of 26,737 bp separated by a large single copy (LSC) of 88,151bp, a small single copy (SSC) of 18,479 bp. A total of 131 genes were identified including 84 protein-coding genes, 37 tRNA genes, eight rRNA genes and two pseudogene (Ψycf1, ΨinfA), respectively. Phylogenomic analysis suggests that M. alternifolia is closely related to the rest species of Myrtaceae with strong bootstrap values.

Keywords: Melaleuca alternifolia, Myrtaceae, chloroplast genome, medicinal tea tree


Melaleuca alternifolia (Maiden & Betche) Cheel (Myrtaceae), commonly known as medicinal tea tree, is a commercially important tall shrub native to eastern Australia that produces valuable tea oil (Butcher et al. 1995). However, M. dissitiflora, M. linariifolia, and other species of Melaleuca can also be used to obtain foliar essential oil (Sharifi-Rad et al. 2017). Correct identification of Melaleuca is a prerequisite because only terpinen-4-ol chemotype of M. alternifolia yields a major medicinally and industry values (Carson et al. 2006). Chloroplast (cp) genome sequences can harbour useful molecular information for species identification and valuable gene sources for the breeding of M. alternifolia.

Fresh leaves were collected from Guangxi Forestry Research Institute (22°55′32.89″N, 108°21′2.20″E) and the voucher specimen (accession No.: 617001) was deposited in the Herbarium of Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences (NAS). The total genomic DNA was isolated using modified CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle 1987) and sequenced on Illumina HiseqXten platform (San Diego, CA). The pair-end sequencing data was assembled using NOVOPlasty 2.7.2 (Dierckxsens et al. 2017). Annotation of the M. alternifolia cp genome was performed using GeSeq (https://chlorobox.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/geseq.html) with default settings and manually adjusted coding regions in Geneious 11.1.5 (https://www.geneious.com).

The cp genome sequence of M. alternifolia (Genbank accession number: MN310606) was 160,104 bp in length. Two copies of inverted repeat (IRs, 26,737 bp) separated the rest of cp genome sequence into a large single copy (LSC, 88,151bp) and a small single copy (SSC, 18,479 bp). The overall GC content of M. alternifolia cp genome was 36.7%. And the base composition of the cp genome is A (31.3%), T (32.0%), C (18.7%), and G (18.0%). A total of 131 genes were identified, containing 84 protein-coding genes, 37 transfer RNA genes (tRNA), eight ribosomal RNA genes (rRNA) and two pseudogene (Ψycf1, ΨinfA). Among these genes, 13 protein-coding genes contained one or two introns.

In order to test the phylogenomic relationship of M. alternifolia with other Myrtaceae, the whole cp genomes of previously published species of Myrtaceae and one outgroup (Melastoma candidum, Melastomataceae, KY745894) were aligned using the MAFFT 7.409 (Katoh and Standley 2013). And molecular phylogenetic tree were reconstructed with the maximum likelihood method that employed in RAxML (Stamatakis 2014). Phylogenomic analysis suggests that M. alternifolia is closely related to the rest species of Myrtaceae with strong bootstrap values (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The consensus RAxML bootstrapping tree of Melaleuca alternifolia and other Myrtaceae species based on the complete chloroplast genomes. The number above each node indicated the bootstrap support value.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Butcher PA, Byrne M, Moran GF. 1995. Variation within and among the chloroplast genomes of Melaleuca alternifolia and M. linariifolia (Myrtaceae). Pl Syst Evol. 194:69–81. [Google Scholar]
  2. Carson CF, Hammer KA, Riley TV. 2006. Melaleuca alternifolia (Tea Tree) oil: a review of antimicrobial and other medicinal properties. Clin Microbiol Rev. 19:50–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dierckxsens N, Mardulyn P, Smits G. 2017. NOVOPlasty: de novo assembly of organelle genomes from whole genome data. Nucleic Acids Res. 45:e18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull. 19:11–15. [Google Scholar]
  5. Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 30:772–780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sharifi-Rad J, Salehi B, Varoni EM, Sharopov F, Yousaf Z, Ayatollahi S, Kobarfard F, Sharifi-Rad M, Afdjei MH, Sharifi-Rad M, et al. 2017. Plants of the Melaleuca genus as antimicrobial agents: from farm to pharmacy. Phytother Res. 31:1475–1494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 30:1312–1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES