Skip to main content
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2019 Oct 24;4(2):3744–3745. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1681314

The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Prunus Cerasifera Ehrh. ‘Pissardii’ (Rosaceae)

Yan Huo a, Ming Yan b, Xueqing Zhao b, Zunling Zhu a,c,, Zhaohe Yuan b,
PMCID: PMC7707454  PMID: 33366170

Abstract

Prunus cerasifera Ehrh. ‘Pissardii’, is a widespread ornamental and fruit tree. Here, we reported the complete chloroplast (cp) genome of P. cerasifera ‘Pissardii’ (GenBank accession number: MN418903). The total cp genome is 157,952 bp in length, displayed a typical quadripartite structure, including a large single copy region (LSC) of 86,286 bp and a small single copy region (SSC) of 18,926 bp, which are separated by a pair of inverted repeat (IR) regions of 26,370 bp. The overall guanine-cytosine (GC) content of the genome sequence is 36.7%. The cp genome encodes 134 unique genes, including 84 protein-coding genes, 42 tRNA genes, and 8 rRNA genes. Phylogenetic analysis of 27 chloroplast genomes showed that P. cerasifera ‘Pissardii’ was closely related to P. humilis in Rosaceae.

Keywords: Prunus cerasifera, Prunus cerasifera ‘Pissardii’, complete chloroplast genome, phylogenetic analysis


Prunus cerasifera Ehrh. (Rosaceae), commonly called Cherry Plum, is native to Southeast Europe and Western Asia. P. cerasifera Ehrh. ‘Pissardii’ is a popular ornamental cultivar due to its unusual purple leaves, white to light pink springtime flowers and edible purple fruits (Zhang 2010). So far, there have been no studies on the complete chloroplast genome of P. cerasifera or P. cerasifera ‘Pissardii’. Considering that universal plastid markers cannot provide enough information to construct the phylogeny of prunus species (Horvath et al. 2011) and cp genome-scale data have proven to be useful in resolving phylogenetic relationships (Olmstead and Palmer 1994), we first report the complete chloroplast genome of P. cerasifera ‘Pissardii’, which will provide valuable molecular data for species identification and phylogenetic analysis for genus Prunus.

The total genomic DNA was extracted by the modified CTAB method (Doyle 1987) from fresh leaves that were collected from a single individual of P. cerasifera ‘Pissardii’ in Nanjing (latitude: 32°07′86.1″N, longitude: 118°81′69.4″E), Jiangsu Province, China. The voucher specimen deposited in Nanjing Forestry University (accession number NFU19051102). Paired-end libraries were constructed and sequenced with an Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform (Nanjing, China) for paired-end 150 bp reads. The cp genome was assembled via NOVOPlasty (Dierckxsens et al. 2017), using the p. cerasoides cp genome (GenBank accession MF621234) as a reference. The finished cp genome was annotated by GeSeq (Tillich et al. 2017), coupled with manual adjustment. Geneious 8.0.4 (Kearse et al. 2012) was used for inspecting the cp genome structure.

The complete cp genome size of P. cerasifera ‘Pissardii’ is 157,952 bp in length, including an LSC region of 86,286 bp and an SSC region of 18,926 bp, which are separated by a pair of IR regions of 26,370 bp. The overall GC content of the cp genome is 36.7% and those in the LSC, SSC, and IR regions are 34.5, 30.5, and 42.6%, respectively. The cp genome encodes 134 unique genes, including 84 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 42 tRNA genes, and 8 rRNA genes. The tRNA genes are distributed throughout the whole genome with 25 in the LSC, 1 in the SSC, 15 in the IR regions, while rRNAs only situate in IR regions. One gene (trnM-CAU) has three copies. Twenty-one genes have two copies, which include eight PCGs (ndhB, rpl2, rpl23, rps12, rps19, rps7, ycf1, ycf2), nine tRNA genes (trnA-UGC, trnG-UCC, trnI-CAU, trnI-GAU, trnL-CAA, trnN-GUU, trnR-ACG, trnT-GGU, trnV-GAC), and four all rRNA genes (rrn16, rrn23, rrn4.5, and rrn5). Among the PCGs, two genes (ycf3 and rps12) contain two introns and 13 different genes (atpF, clpP, ndhA, ndhB, rpl2, rpoC1, rps16, trnA-UGC, trnG-UCC, trnI-GAU, trnK-UUU, trnL-UAA, trnV-UAC) have one intron each.

In order to investigate the evolutionary relationship, the phylogenetic tree including P. cerasifera ‘Pissardii’, 24 Rosaceae species and 2 outgroup species was constructed by cp genomes. Chloroplast genomes sequences were aligned with MAFFT (Katoh and Standley 2013). The maximum likelihood (ML) tree was performed using IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al. 2015). The result revealed that P. cerasifera ‘Pissardii’ was closely related to P. humilis in Rosaceae (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Maximum likelihood (ML) tree based on the chloroplast genome sequences of 27 species. Elaeagnus macrophylla and Ziziphus jujuba were selected as outgroups. Numbers on the nodes are bootstrap values from 1000 replicates.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  1. Doyle JJ. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull. 19:11–15. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dierckxsens N, Mardulyn P, Smits G. 2017. NOVOPlasty: de novo assembly of organelle genomes from whole genome data. Nucleic Acids Res. 45:e18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Horvath A, Balsemin E, Barbot JC, Christmann H, Manzano G, Reynet P, Laigret F, Mariette S. 2011. Phenotypic variability and genetic structure in plum (Prunus domestica L.), cherry plum (P. cerasifera Ehrh.) and sloe (P. spinosa L.). Sci Hortic. 129:283–293. [Google Scholar]
  4. Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 30:772–780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, et al. 2012. Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 28:1647–1649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, Von HA, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 32:268–274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Olmstead RG, Palmer JD. 1994. Chloroplast DNA systematics: a review of methods and data analysis. Am J Bot. 81:1205–1224. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tillich M, Lehwark P, Pellizzer T, Ulbricht-Jones ES, Fischer A, Bock R, Greiner S. 2017. GeSeq-versatile and accurate annotation of organelle genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 45:6–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang TL. 2010. Ornamental trees and shrubs of 1600 species. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press; p. 239–240. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES