Skip to main content
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2019 Oct 21;4(2):3700–3701. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1678435

The complete chloroplast genome of Butomus umbellatus L. and its phylogenetic position

Zhaoping Yang a,, Luxian Liu b
PMCID: PMC7707564  PMID: 33366150

Abstract

Butomus umbellatus, which belongs to Butomaceae, is a plant species typical of littoral communities of river and stream shores. Here, we reported and characterized the complete chloroplast (cp) genome of B. umbellatus and analyzed its phylogenetic position based on the complete cp genome sequences of 10 species within the core Alimatales. The cp genome is 158,107 bp in length, which consists of a large single-copy region (LSC, 88,140 bp; GC content: 34.8%), a small single-copy region (SSC, 19,695 bp; GC content: 30.1%), and a pair of inverted repeat regions (IRs, 25,136 bp; GC content: 42.9%). It harbours 113 unique genes, including 79 protein-coding genes, 30 transfer RNA genes, and 4 ribosomal RNA genes with an overall GC content of 36.8%. The phylogeny inference showed that Butomaceae and Hydrochariaceae formed a high supported clade, which was sister to Alismataceae. This result was similar to the floral development from petaloid Alismatales, and also similar to the phylogenetic studies of Alismales based on 83 plastid genes, but with much higher bootstrap support.

Keywords: Chloroplast genome, phylogenomics, Butomus umbellatus


Butomus umbellatus is one species of Butomaceae, which occurs in shallow standing waters (fishponds or other reservoirs, temporarily flooded field depressions), in small streams or on river banks, mostly on sites with fluctuating water level (Iwamoto et al. 2018). This species usually distributes in North Europe, Asia, and North America. However, in North America, B. umbellatus gradually became an aggressive, invasive, aquatic plant, and it is displacing many native aquatic/wetland plants (Turnage et al. 2019). In recent years, studies on B. umbellatus focus on reproduction biology. Within three ‘petaloid’ families of Alimatales, the inner petals of Butomaceae and Hydrocharitaceae are not delayed, but Alismataceae is delayed (Iwamoto et al. 2018). The question is whether Butomaceae is more closely related to Hydrocharitaceae than to Alismataceae? Here, we firstly reported the complete chloroplast genome characteristics of B. umbellatus and reconstructed its phylogenetic relationship.

Leaf samples of B. umbellatus were collected from the Irtysh riverside, Beitun city, Xinjiang, China. The corresponding voucher herbarium specimens (Yang2017005) were deposited at the Herbarium of Tarim University (TAU). Total DNA was extracted from the silica-gel dried leaf tissue using DNA Plantzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Then, raw reads were obtained by next-generation sequencing, conducting on the Illumina Hiseq Platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The plastome was assembled via NOVOPlasty (Dierckxsens et al. 2017) and deposited into GenBank (accession number: MN484598), with cp genome of Elodea canadensis (GenBank accession number: NC_018541) as a reference. The annotation was performed using Geneious 11.0.5 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand) following description in Liu et al. (2017). The cp genome of B. umbellatus is 158,107 bp in length, which consists of a large single-copy region (LSC, 88,140 bp;GC content: 34.8%), a small single-copy region (SSC, 19,695 bp; GC content: 30.1%), and a pair of inverted repeat regions (IRs, 25,136 bp; GC content: 42.9%), similar structure with most of angiosperm species. It harbours 113 unique genes of B. umbellatus plastome, including 79 protein-coding genes, 30 transfer RNA genes, and 4 ribosomal RNA genes with an overall GC content of 36.8%.

The phylogeny of 10 Alimatales species was reconstructed based on the complete cp genome sequences, using both maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) methods, with one outgroup taxa (Symplocarpus renifolius, Caryophyllaceae). We implemented these methods on CIPRES Science Gateway version 3.3 (Miller et al. 2010). RAxML-HPC version 8.2.12 (Stamatakis 2014) and XSEDE version 3.2.6 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003) were used for building ML and Mrbayes trees, respectively. Consequently, ML and BI analyses generated the same tree topology (Figure 1). Butomaceae and Hydrochariaceae formed a high-supported evolutionary clade, and this clade was sister to Alismataceae. This result was similar to the floral development from petaloid Alismatales and also similar to the phylogenetic studies of Alismales based on 83 plastid genes (Iwamoto et al. 2018), but with much higher bootstrap support (Ross et al. 2016). Both floral development and phylogenetic studies support that Butomaceae is more closely related to Hydrocharitaceae.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Molecular phylogeny of Core Alismatales based on the complete chloroplast genomes of 10 taxa, with Symplocarpus renifolius (Acoraceae) as the outgroup. The accession numbers are listed as below: Alisma plantago-aquatica (MK090659), Elodea canadensis (NC_018541), Najas flexilis (NC_021936), Potamogeton perfoliatus (NC_029814), Sagittaria lichuanensis (NC_029815), Sagittaria trifolia (MK090658), Symplocarpus renifolius (NC_033970), Thalassia hemprichii (KT899950), Tofieldia thibetica (KT899950), and Zostera marina (NC_036014). Relative branch lengths are indicated. Numbers above the lines represent ML bootstrap values/BI posterior probability.

Disclosure statement

The authors are really grateful to the opened genome data from public database. The authors report no conflicts of interest and are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

References

  1. Dierckxsens N, Mardulyn P, Smits G. 2017. NOVOPlasty: de novo assembly of organelle genomes from whole genome data. Nucleic Acids Res. 45:e18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Iwamoto A, Nakamura A, Kurihara S, Otani A, De Craene L. 2018. Floral development of petaloid Alismatales as an insight into the origin of the trimerous Bauplan in monocot flowers. J Plant Res. 131:395–407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Liu LX, Li R, James RP, Worth Li X, Li P, Cameron KM, Fu CX. 2017. The complete chloroplast genome of Chinese bayberry (Morella rubra, Myricaceae): implications for understanding the evolution of Fagales. Front Plant Sci. 8:968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Gateway computing environments workshop (GCE). New Orleans (LA): IEEE; p. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 19:1572–1574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ross TG, Barrett CF, Soto Gomez M, Lam VKY, Henriquez CL, Les DH, Davis JI, Cuenca A, Petersen G, Seberg O, et al. . 2016. Plastid phylogenomics and molecular evolution of Alismatales. Cladistics. 32:160–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 30:1312–1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Turnage G, Byrd JD, Wersal RM, Madsen JD. 2019. Sequential applications of diquat to control flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus L.) in mesocosms. J Aquat Plant Manag. 57:56–61. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES