Skip to main content
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2019 Nov 21;4(2):4200–4201. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1693295

Characterization and phylogenetic analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of the human pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus sp. (Tremellales: Cryptococcaceae)

Yue Chen a,*, Xiaorong Sun a,*, Wenjuan Gui b, Qianru Zhang c,d,e,f, Dan Su a,
PMCID: PMC7707753  PMID: 33366382

Abstract

In the present study, the complete mitogenome of Cryptococcus sp. were sequenced and assembled. The complete mitogenome of Cryptococcus sp. was composed of circular DNA molecules, with a total length of 30,029 bp. The base composition of this mitochondrial genome is as follows: A (31.94%), T (34.89%), G (15.97%), and C (17.21%). The mitogenome contains 20 protein-coding genes, 2 ribosomal RNA genes (rRNA), and 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the mitogenome of the Cryptococcus sp. exhibited a closest relationship with Cryptococcus gattii.

Keywords: Cryptococcus, mitochondrial genome, phylogenetic analysis


Cryptococcosis is a worldwide invasive fungal infection caused by Cryptococcus species (May et al. 2016). Cryptococcosis affects the central nervous system, lung, skin, and other body parts of human and other mammals, Endangers human life and brings great challenges to treatment. Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii complex are the pathogens of cryptococcosis, which are the main factors leading to the death of individuals with low immune function. According to the structural variations, molecular characteristics, and genetic sequence, C. neoformans and C. gattii complex can be subdivided into varieties, serotypes, and molecular types (Cuomo et al. 2018). It is known that in the natural and clinical environment, the haploid lineages within and between the two species complexes resulted in intraspecific and interspecific diploid/aneuploid hybrid strains (Samarasinghe and Xu 2018). Since their initial discovery in 1977 (Bennett et al. 1977), cryptococcal hybrids have been found more and more in clinical and environmental settings. More than 30% of cryptococcal infections in some parts of Europe are caused by hybrid strains. The mitogenome of Cryptococcus sp. reported here will promote further understanding of the population genetics, evolution and pathogenicity of this fungal complex.

The specimen (Cryptococcus sp.) was isolated from the seedling of a conifer in Chengdu, Sichuan, China (104.52 E; 34.16 N) and was stored in Chengdu Bio-HT Company Limited (No. MNC1). This strain was identified as belonging to the C. gattii complex. The Fungal DNA Kit D3390-00 (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA) was used to extract the total genomic DNA of Cryptococcus sp. The total genomic DNA was purified through a Gel Extraction Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA). Purified genomic DNA was stored in the sequencing company (BGI Tech, Shenzhen, China). We constructed sequencing libraries with purified DNA following the instructions of NEBNext® Ultra™ II DNA Library Prep Kit (NEB, Beijing, China). Whole genomic sequencing was performed by the Illumina HiSeq 2500 Platform (Illumina, SanDiego, CA, USA) (Chen et al. 2019). Multiple steps were used for quality control and assembly of the mitogenome (Li, Liao et al. 2018; Li, Wang et al. 2018). Briefly, the Cryptococcus sp. mitogenome was de novo assembled using the SPAdes 3.9.0 software (Bankevich et al. 2012). MITObim V1.9 (Hahn et al. 2013) was used to fill gaps among contigs. The complete mitogenome was annotated using the MFannot tool (Valach et al. 2014), combined with manual corrections. tRNA genes were predicted using tRNAscan-SE v1.3.1 (Lowe and Chan 2016).

The total length of the Cryptococcus sp. mitogenome is 30,029 bp. This mitogenome was submitted to GenBank database under Accession No. MN623378. The circular mitogenome contains 20 protein-coding genes, 2 ribosomal RNA genes (rRNA), and 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes. The base composition of this mitochondrial genome is as follows: A (31.94%), T (34.89%), G (15.97%), and C (17.21%).

To validate the phylogenetic position of Cryptococcus sp., we construct a phylogenetic tree of 14 closely related species based on the nucleotide sequences of the 14 core PCGs (atp6, atp8, atp9, cob, cox1, cox2, cox3, nad1, nad2, nad3, nad4, nad4L, nad5, and nad6) (Li, Chen et al. 2018). Bayesian inference (BI) phylogenetic methods were used to construct phylogenetic trees using the combined gene datasets with MrBayes v3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012). Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) were calculated to assess node support. As shown in the phylogenetic tree (Figure 1), the taxonomic status of the Cryptococcus sp. based on the combined mitochondrial gene dataset exhibits the closest relationship with C. gattii (Yadav et al. 2018).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Molecular phylogenies of 14 species based on Bayesian inference analysis of the combined mitochondrial gene set (14 core protein-coding genes). Node support values are Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP). Mitogenome accession numbers used in this phylogeny analysis: Cryptococcus gattii (CP025773), Cryptococcus neoformans (AY101381), Hannaella oryzae (MH732752), Tremella fuciformis (MF422647), Trichosporon asahii (JH925097), Jaminaea angkorensis (KC628747), Ustilago bromivora (LT558140), Ustilago maydis (DQ157700), Tilletia indica (DQ993184), Tilletia walkeri (EF536375), Microbotryum cf. violaceum (KC285587), Microbotryum lychnidis-dioicae (KC285586), Phakopsora pachyrhizi (GQ332420).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  1. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, et al. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 19(5):455–477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett JE, Kwon-Chung KJ, Howard DH. 1977. Epidemiologic differences among serotypes of Cryptococcus neoformans. Am J Epidemiol. 105(6):582–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen C, Li Q, Chen H, Fu R, Wang J, Chen X, Hu R, Lu D. 2019. The complete mitochondrial genome of Paecilomyces penicillatus (Hypocreales: Sordariomycetes). Mitochondr DNA B. 4(1):199–200. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cuomo CA, Rhodes J, Desjardins CA. 2018. Advances in Cryptococcus genomics: insights into the evolution of pathogenesis. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 113(7):e170473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hahn C, Bachmann L, Chevreux B. 2013. Reconstructing mitochondrial genomes directly from genomic next-generation sequencing reads: a baiting and iterative mapping approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 41(13):e129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Li Q, Chen C, Xiong C, Jin X, Chen Z, Huang W. 2018. Comparative mitogenomics reveals large-scale gene rearrangements in the mitochondrial genome of two Pleurotus species. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 102(14):6143–6153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Li Q, Liao M, Yang M, Xiong C, Jin X, Chen Z, Huang W. 2018. Characterization of the mitochondrial genomes of three species in the ectomycorrhizal genus Cantharellus and phylogeny of Agaricomycetes. Int J Biol Macromol. 118(Pt A):756–769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Li Q, Wang Q, Chen C, Jin X, Chen Z, Xiong C, Li P, Zhao J, Huang W. 2018. Characterization and comparative mitogenomic analysis of six newly sequenced mitochondrial genomes from ectomycorrhizal fungi (Russula) and phylogenetic analysis of the Agaricomycetes. Int J Biol Macromol. 119:792–802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lowe TM, Chan PP. 2016. tRNAscan-SE On-line: integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 44(W1):W54–W57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. May RC, Stone NR, Wiesner DL, Bicanic T, Nielsen K. 2016. Cryptococcus: from environmental saprophyte to global pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol. 14(2):106–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 61(3):539–542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Samarasinghe H, Xu J. 2018. Hybrids and hybridization in the Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii species complexes. Infect Genet Evol. 66:245–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Valach M, Burger G, Gray MW, Lang BF. 2014. Widespread occurrence of organelle genome-encoded 5S rRNAs including permuted molecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 42(22):13764–13777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yadav V, Sun S, Billmyre RB, Thimmappa BC, Shea T, Lintner R, Bakkeren G, Cuomo CA, Heitman J, Sanyal K. 2018. RNAi is a critical determinant of centromere evolution in closely related fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 115(12):3108–3113. 20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES