Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2019 Nov 8;4(2):3892–3893. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1687361

Chloroplast genome of critically endangered Cotoneaster wilsonii (Rosaceae) endemic to Ulleung Island, Korea

Ji Young Yang a, Jae-Hong Pak a,✉, Seung-Chul Kim b,✉
PMCID: PMC7707780  PMID: 33366238

Abstract

Cotoneaster wilsonii Nakai is an endangered species endemic to Ulleung Island, Korea. Here we reported the first complete chloroplast gnome sequences of C. wilsonii, which is 159,999 bp in total length with the large single copy (LSC) region of 87,868 bp, the small single copy (SSC) region of 19,335 bp, and two inverted repeat (IR) regions of 26,399 bp. The plastome contains 131 genes, including 84 protein-coding, eight ribosomal RNA, and 37 transfer RNA genes. The overall GC content is 42.6% and those in the LSC, SSC, and IR regions are 34.2, 30.3, and 42.6%, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis of 21 representative plastomes within the family Rosaceae suggests strongly the monophyly of Cotoneaster and C. wilsonii being sister to the clade of Cotoneaster franchetii and Cotoneaster horizontalis.

Keywords: Chloroplast genome, endangered species, Cotoneaster wilsonii, Ulleung Island, Rosaceae

The genus Cotoneaster Medik. (Rosaceae) contains numerous ornamentally important shrubs and small trees, and consists of ca. 90 species widely distributed in the northern hemisphere, with the center of diversity in the Himalayas and western China (Yü 1974; Willis 1985; Fryer and Hylmö 2009). The majority of species (ca. 90%) are apomictic and tetraploid, and relationships within Cotoneaster are poorly known due in part to many species complex groups and considerable morphological variation (Kroon 1975; Bartish et al. 2001; Talent and Dickinson 2007; Fryer and Hylmö 2009; Dickoré and Kasperek 2010). The earliest classification system based primarily on petal characters (Koehne 1893) resulted in recognization of two subgenera, and several other classification systems have recently been proposed (Yü 1963; Flinck and Hylmö 1966; Phipps et al. 1990; Fryer and Hylmö 2009). Despite several attempts to determine phylogenetic relationships among species, we know little about interspecific relationships within Cotoneaster (Bartish et al. 2001; Lo and Donoghue 2012; Li et al. 2014). In the Korean Peninsula, two species of Cotoneaster, Cotoneaster wilsonii and Cotoneaster integerrimus Medik., are known to occur. While C. integerrimus is known to occur only in North Korea, C. wilsonii is endemic to Ulleung Island, which is young oceanic and volcanic island in East Sea. About 100 individuals of C. wilsonii are found in three subpopulations of sunny cliffs at 110–130 m above sea level, and designated as critically endangered species (CR B2ab(ii)) (National Institute of Biological Resources 2014). Although Chang and Jeon (2003) questioned a distinct species status of C. wilsonii based on flavonoids and morphology, overall species relationships within Cotoneaster multiflorus complex remain to be determined.

In this study, we sequenced the complete plastome of C. wilsonii, and assessed its phylogenetic position within Rosaceae. The collecting permit was obtained via the Division of Forest Biodiversity of Korea National Arboretum. Total genomic DNA (voucher specimen: SKU-Yang1804025; N37°29′9′′ E130°54′28′′) was isolated from fresh leaves using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Carlsbad, CA). Genome sequencing was conducted using the Illumina HiSeq 4000 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA). A total of 31,268,870 pair-end reads were obtained and assembled de novo with Velvet v. 1.2.10 using multiple k-mer (Zerbino and Birney 2008). The tRNAs were confirmed using tRNAsacn-SE (Lowe and Eddy 1997). The complete plastome sequence of C. wilsonii (Genbank accession number: MN516695) was 159,999 bp, with large single copy (LSC; 87,868 bp), small single copy (SSC; 19,335 bp), and two inverted repeats (IRa and IRb; 26,399 bp each). The overall GC content was 42.6% (LSC, 34.3%; SSC, 30.3%; IRs, 42.6%) and the plastome contained 131 genes, including 84 protein-coding, 8 rRNA, and 37 tRNA genes. The maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was conducted using IQ-TREE v.1.4.2 (Nguyen et al. 2015) to determine phylogenetic position of C. wilsonii based on plastomes of 21 representative species of Rosaceae. The complete plastome sequences were aligned using MAFFT v.7 (Katoh and Standley 2013). The ML tree confirmed that the genus Cotoneaster is monophyletic and showed that C. wilsonii is sister to Cotoneaster franchetii and Cotoneaster horizontalis clade (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

The maximum-likelihood (ML) tree based on the 21 representative chloroplast genomes of Rosaceae. The bootstrap value based on 1000 replicates is shown on each node.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no potential conflict of interest. The authors are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

References

  1. Bartish IV, Hylmö B, Nybom H. 2001. RAPD analysis of interspecific relationships in presumably apomictic Cotoneaster species. Euphytica. 120(2):273–280. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chang C-S, Jeon JI. 2003. Leaf floavonoids in Cotoneaster wilsonii (Rosaceae) from the island Ulleung-do, Korea. Biochem Syst Ecol. 31(2):171–179. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dickoré WB, Kasperek G. 2010. Species of Cotoneaster (Rosaceae, Maloideae) indigenous to, naturalizing or commonly cultivated in central Europe. Willdenowia. 40(1):13–45. [Google Scholar]
  4. Flinck KE, Hylmö B. 1966. A list of series and species in the genus Cotoneaster. Bot Not. 119:445. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fryer J, Hylmö B. 2009. Cotoneasters: a comprehensive guide to shrubs for flowers, fruit and foliage. Portland, OR; London, UK: Timber Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 30(4):772–780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Koehne E. 1893. Deutsch. Dendrol. 224 [Google Scholar]
  8. Kroon GH. 1975. Polyploidy in Cotoneaster II. Acta Bot Neerl. 24(5–6):417–420. [Google Scholar]
  9. Li F, Fan Q, Li Q, Chen S, Guo W, Cui D, Liao W. 2014. Molecular phylogeny of Cotoneaster (Rosaceae) inferred from nuclear ITS and multiple chloroplast sequences. Plant Syst Evol. 300(6):1533–1546. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lo EYY, Donoghue MJ. 2012. Expanded phylogenetic and dating analyses of the apples and their relatives. Mol Phylogenetics Evol. 63(2):230–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25(5):955–964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. National Institute of Biological Resources 2014. Cotoneaster wilsonii In: Suh M-H, Lee B-Y, Kim ST, Park C-H, Oh H-K, Kim H-Y, Lee J-H, Lee SY, editors. Korean red list of threatened species. 2nd ed Incheon (Republic of Korea): Ministry of environment; p. 141. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 32(1):268–274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Phipps JB, Kenneth RR, Paul GS, Joseph RR. 1990. A checklist of the subfamily Maloideae (Rosaceae). Can J Bot. 68:2209–2269. [Google Scholar]
  15. Talent N, Dickinson TA. 2007. Apomixis: evolution, mechanism and perspectives In: Grossniklaus U, Hörandl E, Sharbel T, van Dijk P, editors. Apomixis and hybridization in Rosaceae subtribe Pyrineae Dumort: a new tool promises new insights. Ruggell (Liechtenstein): Gantner Verlag; p. 301–316. [Google Scholar]
  16. Willis SY. 1985. A dictionary of the flowering plants and Ferns. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  17. Yü TT. 1963. Taxa nova Rosacearum sinicarum. Acta Phytotaxon Sin. 8:14. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yü TT. 1974. Rosaceae. Flora Republicae Popularis Sinicae. Beijing (China): Science press; p. 36. Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18(5):821–829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES