Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2019 Nov 6;4(2):3852–3853. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1687034

The complete mitochondrial genome of a field cricket Turanogryllus eous (Insecta: Orthoptera)

Chuan Ma 1, Licui Zhang 1, Jianke Li 1,✉
PMCID: PMC7707795  PMID: 33366218

Abstract

The complete mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) of a field cricket Turanogryllus eous Bey-Bienko, 1956 was determined using next-generation sequencing. The mitogenome was 16,045 bp in length comprising 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes, two ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, and a control region. Relative to the ancestral insect gene order, T. eous possessed an inversion of trnN-trnS1-trnE. The control region contained 3.4 tandem copies of a 194-bp sequence. Phylogenetic analysis supported that T. eous was sister to the clade comprising Teleogryllus and Velarifictorus. This study provides essential genetic information for genetic diversity analysis of T. eous.

Keywords: Mitochondrial genome, Turanogryllus eous, gene rearrangement

Turanogryllus eous Bey-Bienko, 1956 is a field cricket species mainly distributed in eastern China and the Korean peninsula (Kim 2012; Cigliano et al. 2019). Due to their calling songs, males of T. eous are collected and traded as one of the singing pets in China. It is suggested that such collection results in a reduction in the ranges and populations of singing insects (Jin and Yen 1998). Investigation into the genetic diversity of T. eous is hampered due to the lack of molecular data. As an important genetic marker, mitogenome is extensively used in insect population genetics (Cameron 2014). In this study, the complete mitogenome of T. eous was determined using next-generation sequencing.

Samples of T. eous were obtained from a pet market in Shanghai, China (31.188°N, 121.437°E). Species identification was based on morphological characteristics. They were preserved in 100% ethanol and deposited with an accession number TE47 in the entomological specimen room in the Institute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Genomic DNA was extracted from a hind leg using a DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen). Indexed libraries were prepared and sequenced on HiSeq 2500 (Illumina Inc.) following the manufacturer's protocol to obtain 150-bp paired-end reads. The full mitogenome was assembled as described by Ma and Li (2018). Mitogenome annotation was conducted on the MITOS webserver (Bernt et al. 2013) followed by manual refinement. To validate tandem repeat sequences in the non-coding control region, a 2.4-kb fragment spanning the whole control region and flanking genes was amplified via PCR followed by Sanger sequencing. The final mitogenome sequence was deposited in GenBank (accession number MK656322). Tandem repeats were recognized using the online Tandem Repeats Finder (Benson 1999). Phylogeny of the family Gryllidae was reconstructed based on nucleotide sequences of the 13 PCGs. The partitioned models selected by PartitionFinder v2.1.1 (Lanfear et al. 2017) were used in MrBayes v3.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012) for the Bayesian inference.

The entire mitogenome of T. eous was a circular molecule of 16,045 bp in length with an A + T-biased nucleotide composition (40.06% A, 31.01% T, 19.37% C, and 9.55% G). The mitogenome consisted of 37 genes (two rRNA genes, 22 tRNA genes, and 13 PCGs), a 1,292-bp non-coding control region, and multiple short intergenic spacers. Compared with the ancestral gene arrangement of insects, T. eous possessed an inversion of the trnN-trnS1-trnE to trnE-trnS1-trnN, which was commonly found in all sequenced mitogenomes of the family Gryllidae. Most PCGs started with typical ATN codons (six with ATG, three with ATT, one with ATA, and one with ATC), whereas cox1 and nad1 started with non-canonical TCG and TTG, respectively, which were verified to act as start codons in transcript studies (Besansky et al. 2006; Stewart and Beckenbach 2009; Ma and Li 2018). Five PCGs ended with complete stop codons (TAA or TAG), while the others were proposed to utilize partial stop condons (T or TA) immediately preceeding a downstream gene. A 194-bp sequence was found to tandemly repeat 3.4 times in the control region. These repeats shared a high sequence identity (>98.8%). In addition, nine intergenic spacers ranging in size from 2 to 24 bp and seven overlaps (1 − 8 bp) between adjacent genes were identified. The phylogenetic tree strongly supported subfamilial monophyly of the family Gryllidae (Figure 1). Within the subfamily Gryllinae, the newly sequenced T. eous was sister to the clade consisting of Teleogryllus and Velarifictorus. The monophyly of the tribe Gryllini represented by Teleogryllus and Loxoblemmus was not supported due to the inclusion of T. eous (Turanogryllini) and Velarifictorus hemelytrus (Modicogryllini).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

The phylogenetic tree of the family Gryllidae inferred from 13 protein-coding genes. Bayesian posterior probability values are indicated at nodes. GenBank accession numbers for each taxon are provided in parenthesis.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  1. Benson G. 1999. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27(2):573–580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernt M, Donath A, Juhling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Putz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF. 2013. MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 69(2):313–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Besansky NJ, Krzywinski J, Grushko OG. 2006. Analysis of the complete mitochondrial DNA from Anopheles funestus: An improved dipteran mitochondrial genome annotation and a temporal dimension of mosquito evolution. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 39(2):417–423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cameron SL. 2014. Insect mitochondrial genomics: implications for evolution and phylogeny. Annu Rev Entomol. 59(1):95–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cigliano MM, Braun H, Eades DC, Otte D. 2019. Orthoptera Species File. Version 5.0/5.0. [accessed 2019 May 14]. http://Orthoptera.SpeciesFile.org
  6. Jin XB, Yen AL. 1998. Conservation and the cricket culture in China. J Insect Conserv. 2(3/4):211–216. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kim TW. 2012. First record of the field-cricket Turanogryllus eous (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Gryllinae) from Korea. Anim Syst Evol Diversity. 28(2):140–144. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lanfear R, Frandsen PB, Wright AM, Senfeld T, Calcott B. 2017. PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol. 34(3):772–773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ma C, Li J. 2018. Comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes of the superfamily Grylloidea (Insecta, Orthoptera) reveals phylogenetic distribution of gene rearrangements. Int J Biol Macromol. 120:1048–1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 61(3):539–542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stewart JB, Beckenbach AT. 2009. Characterization of mature mitochondrial transcripts in Drosophila, and the implications for the tRNA punctuation model in arthropods. Gene. 445(1–2):49–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES