Skip to main content
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2019 Sep 13;4(2):2999–3001. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1666042

Sequencing and analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of dog roundworm Toxocara canis (Nematoda: Toxocaridae) from USA

Xiaduo Meng a,*, Yue Xie a,*,, Xiaobin Gu a,*, Youle Zheng a, Yunjian Liu a, Yingxin Li a, Lu Wang a, Xuan Zhou b, Zhicai Zuo c, Guangyou Yang a
PMCID: PMC7707844  PMID: 33365828

Abstract

The dog roundworm Toxocara canis (Nematoda: Toxocaridae) is an important zoonotic parasitic nematode and cause toxocariasis in human with a worldwide distribution. Herein, the complete mitochondrial genome of a representative of this nematode from USA was determined through next generation sequencing platform. The whole genome was 14,309 bp in size and encoded 12 protein-coding genes, 22 transfer RNAs, and 2 ribosomal RNAs. Phylogeny showed that although T. canis from USA and Australia were more closely related to each other than to that from Chinese, three T. canis isolates clustered together and formed paraphyletic relationships with T. cati and T. malayensis, supporting them as sister species among the family Toxocaridae. These cumulative mitochondrial DNA data should contribute to a better understanding of the phylogenetic relationship of this species.

Keywords: Toxocara canis, toxocariasis, mitochondrial genome, phylogeny


The dog roundworm Toxocara canis (Nematoda: Toxocaridae) serves canine species as definitive hosts and can be also transmitted to other animals including humans, in which the migrating larvae of T. canis cause visceral larva migrans, ocular larva migrans, neurological larva migrans and covert or common toxocariasis (Despommier 2003; Ma et al. 2018). The life cycle of T. canis is complex and high prevalence is frequently found in young canid populations. Adult roundworms inhabit in the small intestine of pups and shed huge eggs to the environment through feces. Humans as accidental hosts become infected by direct contact with dogs, ingestion of eggs-contaminated food or soil, or eating infected meat of paratenic host rodents (Ma et al. 2018; Smith et al. 2009). Human toxocariasis has more than 90% seroprevalence in tropical settings, and even for industrialized countries, the prevalence can range up to 42% in rural areas and to 5% in urban areas (Fan et al. 2015). For example, within the USA, a large-scale national survey showed a 13.9% age-adjusted seroprevalence of toxocariasis (Won et al. 2008; Hotez and Wilkins 2009). Although until now there has been significant knowledge progress about the biology of T. canis, there are still major gaps in the understanding of this parasite, especially in genetics and molecular epidemiology because of lacking suitable genetic markers (Gasser et al. 2005; Holland 2017). Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is proven to be a valuable source of molecular markers and has been widely used for genetics and molecular identification of many zoonotic parasites (Hu and Gasser 2006; Hu et al. 2004). Here, we reported the complete mitochondrial genome sequence of a representative T. canis from USA and added novel mtDNA data to this zoonotic parasite.

The parasite samples were obtained from an infected household dog raised by a 72-year-old female nursing home resident at Silver Spring (39°0′N, 77°1′E), Maryland, USA, after treatment with pyrantel pamoate. After morphological identification, the worm specimens (n = 3) were identified as T. canis females according to the taxonomic key of Skrjabin et al. (1991) and molecular confirmation by amplification and sequencing of the first and second internal transcribed spacers (ITS1/2) of nuclear ribosomal DNA (Zhu et al. 1998; Zhou et al. 2010). One worm was used for mtDNA extraction, and the remaining two were fixed in 5% formalin solution and archived in the Parasitological Museum of Sichuan Agricultural University (Sichuan, China) under voucher numbers XY2018_5-6. The mtDNA was sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq platform (Novogene, Tianjin, China). The genome assembly was achieved using MITObim (Hahn et al. 2013), and gene annotation was developed by MITOS (Bernt et al. 2013).

The complete mtDNA of T. canis was 14,309 bp in size (GenBank accession no. MN189971) and encoded 12 protein-coding genes, 22 tRNA genes, and 2 rRNA genes. All genes were transcribed in the same direction on the same strand. Among the 12 protein-coding genes, except atp6, nad2, nad5, and nad4L deduced to use an incomplete stop codon ‘T’, the rest were predicted to use the typical TAG or TAA as the stop codons. Twenty-two tRNA genes ranged from 52 bp (tRNA(AGY)-Ser) to 64 bp (tRNA-Glu) in size. Both rRNAs were 695 bp (12S) and 963 bp (16S) in size, respectively, and located between tRNA-Glu and tRNA(UCN)-Ser and between tRNA-His and nad3, respectively. Two non-coding regions, namely NCR1 (also known as AT-rich region; 203 bp) and NCR2 (174 bp), were placed between tRNA(UCN)-Ser and tRNA-Asn and between nad4 and cox1, respectively.

A maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogeny was reconstructed on a concatenated amino acid dataset of 12 protein-coding genes from 31 nematode parasites, using Cucullanus robustus as outgroup. This phylogeneric tree showed that T. canis from USA and Australia were more closely related to each other than to that from Chinese, nevertheless, three T. canis isolates clustered together and formed a branch that was paraphyletic with the congeneric Toxocara cati and Toxocara malayensis with 100% bootstrap confidence, supporting their sister-species relationships within the family Toxocaridae (Figure 1). In addition, within this topology, each family Toxocaridae, Ascarididae, Anisakidae or Ascaridiidae was treated as a monophyletic group in the order Ascaridida, consistent with results of morphological and molecular studies (Hartwich 1974; Li et al. 2018). In conclusion, the complete mtDNA of T. canis sequenced here provides a novel marker resource for genetic and evolutionary biological studies of this zoonotic nematode.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Maximum likelihood (ML) tree inferred from concatenated amino-acid sequences of 12 mitochondrial protein-coding genes of T. canis and other related nematodes, utilizing MtArt + I + G model with 10,000 bootstrap replications (<50% support not shown). The solid black diamond represents the species in this study.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  1. Bernt M, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF. 2013. MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 69:313–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Despommier D. 2003. Toxocariasis: clinical aspects, epidemiology, medical ecology, and molecular aspects. Clin Microbiol Rev. 16:265–272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fan CK, Holland CV, Loxton K, Barghouth U. 2015. Cerebral toxocariasis: silent progression to neurodegenerative disorders?. Clin Microbiol Rev. 28:663–686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gasser RB, Zhu XQ, Hu M, Jacobs DE, Chilton NB. 2005. Molecular genetic characterisation of members of the genus Toxocara (Nematoda: Ascaridoidea) – systematic, population genetic and epidemiological considerations In: Holland CV, Smith HV, editors. Toxocara: the enigmatic parasite. Wallingford: CABI Press; p.18–31. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hahn C, Bachmann L, Chevreux B. 2013. Reconstructing mitochondrial genomes directly from genomic next-generation sequencing reads-a baiting and iterative mapping approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:e129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hartwich G. 1974. Keys to genera of the Ascaridoidea In: Anderson RC, Chabaud AG, Willmott S, editors. CIH keys to the nematode parasites of vertebrates No. 2. Farnham Royal: Agricultural Bureaux; p.1–15. [Google Scholar]
  7. Holland CV. 2017. Knowledge gaps in the epidemiology of Toxocara: the enigma remains. Parasitology. 144:81–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hotez PJ, Wilkins PP. 2009. Toxocariasis: America’s most common neglected infection of poverty and a helminthiasis of global importance?. PLOS Negl Trop Dis. 3:e400–e401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hu M, Chilton NB, Gasser RB. 2004. The mitochondrial genomics of parasitic nematodes of socio-economic importance: recent progress, and implications for population genetics and systematics. Adv Parasitol. 56:134–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hu M, Gasser RB. 2006. Mitochondrial genomes of parasitic nematodes-progress and perspectives. Trends Parasitol. 22:78–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Li L, Lü L, Nadler SA, Gibson DI, Zhang LP, Chen HX, Zhao WT, Guo YN. 2018. Molecular phylogeny and dating reveal a terrestrial origin in the early carboniferous for ascaridoid nematodes. Syst Biol. 67:888–900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ma G, Holland CV, Wang T, Hofmann A, Fan CK, Maizels RM, Hotez PJ, Gasser RB. 2018. Human toxocariasis. Lancet Infect Dis. 18:e14–e24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Skrjabin KI, Shikhobalova NP, Mozgovoi AA. 1991. Key to parasitic nematodes. New Delhi: Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  14. Smith H, Holland C, Taylor M, Magnaval JF, Schantz P, Maizels R. 2009. How common is human toxocariasis? Towards standardizing our knowledge. Trends Parasitol. 25:182–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Won KY, Kruszon-Moran D, Schantz PM, Jones JL. 2008. National seroprevalence and risk factors for zoonotic Toxocara spp. infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 79:552–557. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhou R, Xia Q, Huang H, Deng M. 2010. Cloning and sequencing of ITS1 rDNA from Toxocara canis. Chin J Prev Med. 32:818–820. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhu XQ, Jacobs DE, Chilton NB, Sani RA, Cheng NA, Gasser RB. 1998. Molecular characterization of a Toxocara variant from cats in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Parasitology. 117:155–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES