Skip to main content
Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry logoLink to Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry
. 2020 Jul 6;68(12):887–906. doi: 10.1369/0022155420930303

Communications via the Small Leucine-rich Proteoglycans: Molecular Specificity in Inflammation and Autoimmune Diseases

Jinyang Zeng-Brouwers 1, Sony Pandey 2, Jonel Trebicka 3, Malgorzata Wygrecka 4,5, Liliana Schaefer 6,*,
Editors: Liliana Schaefer, Charles W Frevert
PMCID: PMC7708667  PMID: 32623933

Abstract

Inflammation is a highly regulated biological response of the immune system that is triggered by assaulting pathogens or endogenous alarmins. It is now well established that some soluble extracellular matrix constituents, such as small leucine-rich proteoglycans (SLRPs), can act as danger signals and trigger aseptic inflammation by interacting with innate immune receptors. SLRP inflammatory signaling cascade goes far beyond its canonical function. By choosing specific innate immune receptors, coreceptors, and adaptor molecules, SLRPs promote a switch between pro- and anti-inflammatory signaling, thereby determining disease resolution or chronification. Moreover, by orchestrating signaling through various receptors, SLRPs fine-tune inflammation and, despite their structural homology, regulate inflammatory processes in a molecule-specific manner. Hence, the overarching theme of this review is to highlight the molecular and functional specificity of biglycan-, decorin-, lumican-, and fibromodulin-mediated signaling in inflammatory and autoimmune diseases

Keywords: autophagy, biglycan, decorin, extracellular matrix, fibromodulin, glycosaminoglycan, lumican, macrophage, proteoglycan, Toll-like receptor

Introduction

Inflammation is a tightly regulated biological response of the immune system against invading foreign objects or endogenous signals.1,2 Foreign objects (e.g., bacteria or viruses) express pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) that are recognized by pattern recognition receptors to trigger an inflammatory response.3 The endogenous triggers of this process are called damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). DAMPs originate either from inside the cell or from the extracellular matrix (ECM).3 It is of note that DAMPs, similar to PAMPs, are recognized by the same innate immune receptors, for example, Toll-like receptors (TLRs), RIG-I-like receptors, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors, receptor for advanced glycation end products, integrins, and cluster of differentiation (CD) 44.4 The induction of inflammation initiated by PAMPs or DAMPs results in the release of cytokines/chemokines to protect the body against the spread of infection or uncontrolled tissue damage.5

The fate of inflammation, however, is determined by the resolution phase.6 Resolution is important to subside inflammation and is mediated through other tightly regulated mechanisms such as autophagy that is responsible for the clearance of damaged cells or cellular organelles.7 Chronic or uncontrolled activation of the innate immune response leads to inflammatory diseases.8 Similarly, chronic inflammatory response erroneously triggered against the body’s healthy tissues and activated by the adaptive immune response results in autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), multiple sclerosis (MS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and type 1 diabetes mellitus, among others.9,10

It is becoming increasingly clear that members of the small leucine-rich proteoglycan (SLRP) family play critical roles in both the promotion and the resolution of inflammation as canonical ECM-derived DAMPs.1114 The SLRPs are a family of proteoglycans that are major components in the ECM with common leucine-rich repeat (LRR) region in their core protein.15,16 The SLRP family has been expanded to five classes based on homologies at the genomic and protein level.17 The class I SLRPs, decorin and biglycan, as well as lumican and fibromodulin that belong to class II, are the best characterized members of the SLRP family.18 SLRPs are present in various tissues in either an ECM-bound or soluble form and have important structural and signaling functions.16,17,1925 As signaling molecules, SLRPs regulate both pathogen-mediated and sterile inflammation during innate and adaptive immune responses.3,26 These interactions are tightly coordinated and mediated through specific receptors, coreceptors, adaptor molecules, and specific SLRP regions.14,16,2224

It becomes obvious that besides their structural homology, SLRPs regulate inflammatory processes in a molecule-specific manner. In this review, we aim to discuss recent mechanisms of biglycan-, decorin-, lumican-, and fibromodulin-mediated aggravation and resolution of inflammation. The functional specificity of SLRP signaling in inflammatory and autoimmune diseases will be emphasized.

Biglycan Signaling in Inflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases

The ECM-bound and Soluble Form of Biglycan

Biglycan, a member of class I SLRPs, consists of a 42-kDa protein core containing 10 LRRs that are covalently bound to one or two chondroitin/dermatan sulfate glycosaminoglycan (GAG) side chains.16,21 Through its protein core and GAG chains, biglycan interacts with various ECM components, for example, collagen types I, II, III, IV, and VI and elastin, thereby playing a crucial structural role in majority of tissues.2731

It is now well accepted that biglycan exists in the blood and organs in two forms: the physiological form that is ECM-sequestered and the soluble form that is associated with tissue stress and injury.11,3234 Soluble biglycan is generated via the proteolytic release of ECM-bound biglycan.35 This is the fastest mechanism to protect tissues with both full-length and fragmented biglycan during an emergency. This is followed by de novo expression and secretion of full-length biglycan by macrophages and later on by tissue-resident cells.11,35 Both ECM-bound and soluble biglycan can influence multiple signaling pathways by interacting with various growth factors and cytokines, for example, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β); tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α); bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2, -4, -6; and Wnt-1-induced secreted protein 1 (WISP1).3639 In contrast, only soluble form of biglycan can interact with and signal through TLR2/TLR4. Although biglycan binds to TLRs at the protein core,40 the GAG side chains are required for its signaling via TLR2 and TLR4.11,35 All studies to date show that only intact biglycan containing both protein core and GAG side chains is capable of triggering pro-inflammatory signaling.11,32,41,42

There are several reviews that address the complexity of biglycan signaling in detail.3,4,14,1923,25,33,35,4348 In this article, we will briefly summarize the interaction of biglycan with TLR2/TLR4 and the decisive role of TLR coreceptors and adaptor molecules in regulating the downstream outcomes of the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B-cells (NF-κB) and inflammasome signaling pathways. We will emphasize the role of biglycan in bridging innate and adaptive immune responses. Finally, we will summarize current knowledge regarding the input of biglycan in inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.

Biglycan Acts as a Danger Signal Through TLR2 and TLR4

Research over the last 15 years provides concrete evidence that soluble biglycan acts as ECM-derived danger signal in macrophages.3,11 Biglycan binds to TLR2 and TLR4 with an affinity comparable to respective pathogen-derived ligands of TLR2/TLR4, thereby mimicking the response of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.11,40,41 Downstream of both receptors, biglycan triggers NF-κB-, p38-, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling.11 This leads to the activation of various inflammatory cytokines, for example, TNF-α, macrophage inflammatory protein 2, and interleukin (IL)-1β, as well as chemokines, for example, C-C motif chemokine ligand (CCL) 2, CCL5, C-X-C motif ligand (CXCL) 1, and CXCL13 (Fig. 1).11,32,49

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Biglycan determines pro- and anti-inflammatory signaling response by switching between TLR2/TLR4/CD14 and TLR4/CD44. Soluble biglycan via TLR2/TLR4/CD14 activates the pro-inflammatory NF-κB signaling, leading to chemokine and cytokine production, immune cell recruitment, and pro-IL-1β production. Based on the same signaling, biglycan induces ROS generation and production of the B-cell chemoattractant CXCL13. In addition, biglycan clusters the purinergic receptors P2X4/P2X7 to trigger the NLRP3 inflammasome assembly, subsequently leading to the turnover of pro-IL-1β, by activated caspase-1, to active IL-1β. Together, these responses facilitate innate immunity and inflammation, promoting inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. However, soluble biglycan can also exert anti-inflammatory signals. Biglycan induces the expression of NOX2 via the TLR2/TLR4/TRIF pathway, which ultimately leads to the inhibition of biglycan-TLR2/TLR4/MyD88-mediated IL-1β production. Furthermore, biglycan decreases inflammation by induction of autophagy. Through TLR4 and its coreceptor CD44, biglycan induces autophagy of M1 macrophages, thereby elevating the number of anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages. These responses can thereby inhibit unmitigated inflammation during inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Abbreviations: CD, cluster of differentiation; CXCL, chemokine (C-X-C) motif ligand; IL, interleukin; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B-cells; MyD88, myeloid differentiation primary response 88; NLRP3, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain, leucine-rich repeat and pyrin domain containing 3; NOX, NADPH oxidase; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TLR, Toll-like receptor; TRIF, TIR domain-containing adaptor-inducing interferon-β.

Furthermore, by clustering TLR2/TLR4 with the P2X4/P2X7 purinergic receptors, biglycan autonomously triggers the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain, leucine-rich repeat and pyrin domain containing (NLRP) 3 inflammasome, thereby activating caspase-1 and inducing the maturation and secretion of IL-1β (Fig. 1).41

Biglycan Regulates Signaling Outcome by Selectively Interacting With TLRs, Their Adaptor Molecules, and Coreceptors

The initial finding that biglycan utilizes both TLRs to trigger “sterile” inflammation was verified by careful analysis of biglycan-mediated recruitment of neutrophils, macrophages, and T-cells into the kidney.40 It became obvious that biglycan, by “choosing” one of the TLRs or their specific adaptor molecules, the myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88) or Toll/IL-1R domain-containing adaptor-inducing interferon (IFN)-β (TRIF), triggers specific downstream signaling outcome (Fig. 1).40 Accordingly, by using the TLR2/TLR4/MyD88 pathway, biglycan activates the chemoattractants CXCL1, CXCL2, and CCL2 to recruit neutrophils and macrophages.40 In contrast, infiltration of T-cells is triggered by biglycan via the TLR4/TRIF pathway and production of CCL5 and CXCL10.13,40 Selective signaling of biglycan via TLR2 or TLR4 and their adaptor molecules is even more complex in terms of the T-helper (Th) 1 and Th17 cell recruitment.13 Through TLR4/TRIF, biglycan stimulates infiltration of CXCR3-positive Th1 and Th17 cells. However, CC chemokine receptor 6–positive Th17 cells are recruited by biglycan via TLR2 and TLR4 and their common adaptor MyD88.13

Furthermore, biglycan initiates a crosstalk between TLR and sphingosine kinase (SphK) 1 signaling or reactive oxygen species (ROS) signaling, resulting in various downstream outcomes.50,51 Accordingly, biglycan stimulates the production and activation of SphK1 in a TLR4/TRIF-dependent manner. Of particular note is the biglycan-triggered expression of the B-cell chemoattractant CXCL13 in peritoneal macrophages and splenic dendritic cells that is mediated by TLR2 and TLR4 and involves ROS as part of their signaling cascade (Fig. 1).32 For further details, please refer to recent reviews.13,25,52

It is of note that biglycan, besides acting as a canonical DAMP, exerts additional anti-inflammatory effects. Up to now, two mechanisms of biglycan-mediated inhibition of the inflammatory response are described.34,50 Biglycan is involved in TLR4/TRIF-dependent production of NADPH oxidase (NOX) 2 (Fig. 1).50 Furthermore, biglycan triggers the translocation of NOX2 from the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane, resulting in the formation and activation of the NOX2 complex. Active NOX2 inhibits biglycan/TLR2/TLR4/MyD88-dependent IL-1β production, thereby reducing inflammation (Fig. 1).24,50 It is tempting to speculate that this mechanism is involved under physiological conditions to avoid the pro-inflammatory effects of biglycan released from the ECM.

Recent studies have provided a new milestone in our understanding of how biglycan influences the outcome of inflammatory diseases. Biglycan promotes a switch between inflammation and autophagy via selectively choosing CD14, the coreceptor of TLR2/TLR4, or CD44, the TLR4 coreceptor.14,34 By interacting with either TLR2/CD14 or TLR4/CD14, biglycan acts as a canonical DAMP, thereby promoting recruitment of pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages into the kidney.34,52 In contrast, binding of biglycan to the TLR4 coreceptor, CD44, causes M1 macrophage autophagy (Fig. 1).34 This is associated with enhanced number of alternatively polarized anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages and reduced tissue damage (Fig. 1).34 Thus, biglycan, by selecting a respective coreceptor for TLRs, promotes either inflammation or autophagy, thereby determining disease chronification or resolution.

Biglycan in Inflammatory Diseases

There is a plethora of reports underscoring the mechanisms of biglycan-dependent regulation of inflammation under in vivo conditions.25,32,53 In this review, the most striking examples will be addressed. For further details, please refer to recent reviews on biglycan.3,4,14,1923,25,33,35,4348

The importance of biglycan signaling in pathogen-dependent inflammation is clearly demonstrated in a mouse model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced sepsis as biglycan-deficient mice markedly displayed prolonged survival time associated with lower plasma levels of the two major inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1β.11,41

There are several examples for biglycan self-directed sterile inflammation in vivo. The critical role of biglycan in the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome is confirmed in experimental models of renal inflammation and fibrosis.32,41 In lupus nephritis (LN) and unilateral ureteral obstruction, biglycan deficiency causes lower levels of active caspase-1 and mature IL-1β, which is associated with a reduction in renal tissue damage.41,49 In contrast, overexpression of soluble biglycan aggravates kidney damage in LN and ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI).32,49

Furthermore, in biglycan-deficient and biglycan-overexpressing mice challenged by renal IRI, the significance of biglycan-dependent regulation of SphK1 and NOX2 in the kidney is clearly demonstrated.51,54 Also, there are several reports demonstrating how biglycan orchestrates inflammatory signaling in cancer development.2326

Taken together, there is growing evidence for a critical role of biglycan in various inflammatory diseases. It is becoming apparent that soluble biglycan triggers sterile inflammation autonomously. In pathogen-mediated diseases, biglycan potentiates the inflammatory response via a second TLR that is not involved in pathogenic sensing, for example, via TLR2 in LPS-mediated sepsis.

Biglycan in Autoimmune Diseases

Elevated soluble biglycan levels are reported in several autoimmune diseases, for example, RA, autoimmune perimyocarditis, diabetes mellitus type 1, and LN.13,42,55 In LN, soluble biglycan triggers innate and adaptive immune responses, thereby controlling the progression and outcome of this disease.13,32 In MRL/lpr mice lacking or overexpressing soluble biglycan, a critical role of this proteoglycan for CXCL13-dependent recruitment of B1- and B-lymphocytes is proven.32 Furthermore, biglycan in LN triggers the production of various chemoattractants for neutrophils, macrophages, and T-cells, thereby regulating albuminuria and degree of kidney damage.32 Importantly, elevated plasma levels of biglycan in correlation with albuminuria and disease progression were detected in patients suffering from LN.32

Furthermore, biglycan is an important trigger of CXCL9/CXCL10-mediated recruitment of Th1 and Th17 cells in LN.13 In LN patients and MRL/lpr mice, increased plasma concentration of soluble biglycan correlates with enhanced CXCL9 and CXCL10 levels.13 In addition, by interacting with TLR2/TLR4 receptors and their protein adaptor molecules MyD88 and TRIF, biglycan influences major histocompatibility complex (MHC) I– and MHC II–restricted T‑cell cross-priming.53 In a model of experimental autoimmune perimyocarditis, biglycan–TLR4 interaction induces cardiomyocyte antigen presentation to prime T-cells.53

Biglycan is also involved in the pathogenesis of diseases which involve dysregulated ECM remodeling, for example, RA.5658 Increased levels of soluble biglycan and anti-biglycan antibodies were detected in the synovial fluid of patients suffering from RA.56,57 In addition, it has been reported that anti-biglycan antibody caused collagen fiber decomposition.56,57 Biglycan was therefore proposed as an initiator of tissue destruction in RA.56,57 Moreover, in a rat model of collagen-induced RA, fragments of biglycan generated by matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) degradation positively correlated with the progression of RA.58

Up to now, inflammatory signaling of biglycan and its relevance under disease condition is the best characterized among all SLRPs. Thus, biglycan tightly regulates inflammation, and thereby inflammatory diseases, by orchestrating signaling in the direction of either resolution or chronification, in a molecule-specific way.

Decorin-dependent Regulation of Inflammation

Structural and Functional Characteristics of Decorin

Decorin is another class I SLRP that is structurally close to biglycan, sharing 55% homology with it.59 It is composed of a 40-kDa protein core containing 10 LRRs and a single chondroitin/dermatan sulfate GAG side chain attached to its N-terminal site.60 Decorin is mostly found in the ECM matrix of various types of connective tissues such as skin and bone,33 where it interacts with collagen I exerting its ability for collagen fibrillogenesis.6165 Besides its structural role, decorin is also one of the most versatile SLRPs that regulates a vast range of cellular processes, including angiogenesis,66,67 myocardial infarction,68 innate immunity,22 fibrosis,69 wound healing,70 tumor growth and autophagy.7175 This functional diversity arises from a broad array of interactions between decorin and its various binding partners that encompass ECM constituents, cellular receptors, growth factors, proteases/enzymes, and other signaling molecules.71,76,77 The majority of decorin interactions with its binding partners occurs via the specific binding motifs in its protein core, whereas some interactions can also involve its GAG chain.62,78 The complexity of decorin interacting networks and the biological functions of these multifaceted interactions have previously been addressed in detail in several reviews.71,76,77,7982

Decorin Triggers Pro-inflammatory Effect in Macrophages

Soluble decorin, similar to biglycan, is ascertained as an endogenous ligand of TLR2 and TLR4, acting as a canonical DAMP and regulator of pathogen-mediated and sterile inflammation (Fig. 2).12 Akin to biglycan, only intact decorin encompassing both protein core and GAG chain can trigger a pro-inflammatory response in macrophages.12,43

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Decorin protein structure is critical in determining its pro- and anti-inflammatory signaling response. The proteoglycan form of decorin, comprising the protein core and GAG chain, promotes innate immunity and inflammation by dual mechanisms. On one hand, decorin, by binding to TLR2/TLR 4, activates NF-κB signaling and induces the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines Tnfα, Il-12p70, and Pdcd4, as well as the anti-inflammatory cytokine Il10. On the other hand, by binding to TGF-β1, decorin blocks TGF-β1 binding and its subsequent activation of the TGF-β receptor (TGFβR), thus inhibiting the maturation of microRNA-21, a posttranscriptional inhibitor of PDCD4. Increased PDCD4 abundance reduces levels of IL-10. This results in inflammation, which in chronic conditions can lead to inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. In contrast, the decorin protein core promotes anti-inflammatory effects by suppressing the expression of leukocyte chemotactic genes and inflammatory genes, albeit the exact receptors involved in the signaling are still unknown. Nevertheless, their anti-inflammatory effect has important functions in mitigating inflammation during inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Abbreviations: GAG, glycosaminoglycan; IL, interleukin; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B-cells; TLR, Toll-like receptor; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; PDCD4, programmed cell death protein 4; TGF, transforming growth factor.

Binding of decorin to TLR2 and TLR4 in macrophages results in the rapid activation of p38, ERK1/2, and NF-κB pathways and enhances the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-12p70 (Fig. 2).12 Furthermore, by signaling through TLR2/TLR4, decorin acts as a transcriptional inducer of tumor suppressor programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4), a unique regulator of both tumorigenesis and inflammation (Fig. 2).12,83 In addition, by a reduction in mature microRNA (miR)-21, an oncogene and a posttranscriptional repressor of PDCD4, decorin further contributes to the enhancement of PDCD4 protein abundance (Fig. 2).12 This occurs independent of TLR2/TLR4 and is based on decorin-mediated inactivation of TGF-β1, which normally enhances the levels of precursor and mature miR-21.12,84 The subsequent increase in PDCD4, a specific translational suppressor of IL-10, finally results in lower anti-inflammatory IL-10 protein levels (Fig. 2).12

Taken together, decorin creates a pro-inflammatory environment by the stimulation of pro-inflammatory PDCD4, TNF-α, and IL-12, as well as by the inhibition of immunosuppressive TGF-β1 and anti-inflammatory IL-10 (Fig. 2). Hence, this pro-inflammatory pathway is evoked in a decorin-specific manner that differs from biglycan signaling.

Decorin in Inflammatory Diseases

Decorin-driven inflammatory signaling was verified in vivo in sepsis and tumor xenografts.12 In LPS-induced septic mice, high levels of decorin mRNA and protein are detected in septic lungs and macrophages.12 In contrast, decorin deficiency in septic mice leads to reduced PDCD4 abundance and enhanced expression of miR-21 and IL-10, which are associated with attenuated pro-inflammatory responses. This study was corroborated by a subsequent finding that LPS promoted PDCD4 degradation and IL-10 production in macrophages.85

In a model of tumor xenograft growth, adenovirus-mediated overexpression of decorin causes TLR2/TLR4-driven synthesis of PDCD4, TNF-α and IL-12, and TGF-β1/miR-21-mediated inhibition of PDCD4 suppression.12 In consequence, the immune reaction is shifted to a more apoptotic and inflammatory response with strong anti-tumorigenic effects, resulting in a marked retardation of tumor growth.12 This, along with the enhancement of the tumor suppressor PDCD4 and the reduction of the oncogene miR-21, might represent an attractive approach for cancer therapy.

There are no doubts about the pivotal role of decorin as an inhibitor of tumor growth and metastasis.77 This is based on the ability of decorin to engage multiple receptor tyrosine kinases and to act as a signaling molecule regulating angiogenesis.86 Even though the relationship between inflammation, immunity, and cancer is well established,87 studies addressing decorin-dependent regulation of tumor inflammation are still required. Further details regarding oncosuppressive functions of decorin are included in recent thematic reviews.23,76,79,8890

The pro-inflammatory role of decorin is further underscored by findings demonstrating that overexpression of pancreatic decorin is associated with prolonged inflammation in chronic pancreatitis.91 This is due to decorin-dependent overexpression of the chemoattractant CCL2, resulting in enhanced recruitment of mononuclear cells to the injury site and maintenance of inflammation.91

Maintenance of inflammation through decorin-mediated pro-inflammatory signaling was also observed in delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH).92,93 In an oxazolone-mediated mouse model of contact dermatitis, decorin deficiency decreased DTH progression based on the reduced expression of inflammatory cytokines, defects in CD8+ leukocyte recruitment, and altered functions of IFN-γ.92,93 Furthermore, in a murine model of allergic asthma, lack of decorin resulted in an abolished pulmonary inflammation and increased expression of anti-inflammatory Il10 and Foxp3 in CD4+CD25+ T-cells, causing reduction in lung tissue damage.94,95

Hence, the majority of reports addressing the role of decorin in inflammation clearly stress pro-inflammatory effects mediated by this SLRP. Remarkably, analysis of the global gene expression profile of the tumor microenvironment in a triple-negative orthotopic breast carcinoma xenograft model revealed that the leukocyte chemotactic and inflammatory genes are the most significantly downregulated by decorin protein core (Fig. 2).96 It is of note that these findings are not contrary to other reports identifying decorin as a pro-inflammatory SLRP. It is known that decorin binds to TLR2/TLR4 via its protein core.12 However, an intact decorin, consisting of the protein core and one GAG side chain, is required for TLR2/TLR4-mediated signaling.12 Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that decorin protein core acts as a non-signaling TLR2/TLR4 agonist and inhibits binding of other DAMPs from the tumor microenvironment to TLR2 and TLR4, thereby inhibiting inflammation. Future studies are required to further clarify signaling mechanisms of the decorin-mediated inflammatory response. It is of particular interest to elucidate whether decorin triggers inflammation only through TLR2/TLR4 and TGF-β1 or whether additional signaling through several receptor tyrosine kinases is involved in this process.

Decorin in Autoimmune Diseases

There are several reports suggesting the involvement of decorin in the progression of autoimmune diseases.97,98 A recent study identified decorin as a crucial trigger of sterile inflammation in an NOD.B10 mouse model of primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS),97 a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by exocrine gland dysfunction and immune hyperactivity.99 Mechanistically, decorin via TLR4 signaling stimulates the production of TNF-α and several other inflammatory cytokines in splenocytes.98 Surprisingly, the inflammatory cytokine profile evoked by decorin/TLR4 differs from that induced by LPS/TLR4.98

There are several explanations for this distinct signaling outcome. As pharmacological inhibitors and neutralizing antibodies were used in these studies to identify the TLR conveying the decorin signals, a potential interaction of TLR2 is not completely excluded.12 Furthermore, decorin-mediated crosstalk between TLR4 and TGF-β1 signaling should be considered.12 This is conceivable because an enhanced proteolytic cleavage of decorin correlated with elevated TGF-β levels in saliva and exocrine glands from the NOD pSS mice.100 Moreover, multiple interactions of decorin with receptor tyrosine kinases may provide another level of complexity into the inflammatory signaling of decorin.86

In contrast to pSS where decorin acts as an inducer of the disease phenotype,97,98 in experimental IBD, decorin has protective effects on intestinal cells.101 IBD is an autoimmune disease characterized by chronic inflammatory gastrointestinal disorders.101 The pathogenesis of IBD is a complex process that involves dysregulation of both inflammation and autophagy.102 Decorin is a well-known inducer of inflammation and autophagy.89 Indeed, in the intestinal tissues of IBD mouse, enhanced decorin expression was associated with increased number of autophagosomes and elevated levels of autophagy-associated proteins.101 The reason why decorin promotes either inflammation or autophagy in autoimmune diseases is still a matter of debate. It is tempting to speculate that decorin, similar to biglycan,34 by choosing the coreceptor for TLR4, is switching the signaling pathway from inflammation to autophagy. It is also possible that the expression level of inflammatory and autophagic receptors for decorin in various tissues determines which signaling will be conveyed by decorin. Thus, it is increasingly evident that decorin-dependent signaling crosstalk between inflammation and autophagy should be addressed in more detail.

Lumican-specific Regulation of the Inflammatory Response

The Role of Lumican Under Physiological Conditions

Lumican is a 40-kDa proteoglycan that belongs to the class II subfamily of SLRPs and was initially described as one of the major keratan sulfate proteoglycans in the adult cornea.103106 Besides the cornea, high level of lumican has been found in various types of tissues, including artery, aorta, dermis, lung, kidney, and intervertebral discs.104,107,108 However, in these organs, lumican is present as a glycoprotein in contrast to the cornea where it is present as a keratan sulfate proteoglycan.104 Lumican regulates collagen assembly in the cornea and plays a crucial role in cell migration and proliferation during embryonic development and tissue repair.104,109112 Apart from its physiological role as a structural component of the ECM, lumican is also involved in the regulation of cell functions such as growth, apoptosis, migration, invasion, and angiogenesis.113,114 For more details, please refer to recent review papers on the structural and biological functions of lumican.15,16,115124

Mechanisms of Lumican-dependent Regulation of Inflammation

An increasing number of reports have asserted that besides its physiological functions, lumican is also involved in the regulation of innate immunity.111,125128 However, in contrast to biglycan11 and decorin,43 lumican does not act as a DAMP but instead promotes pathogen-dependent signaling. The lumican core protein forms a complex with bacterial LPS component and binds to CD14, the TLR4 coreceptor, on the surface of macrophages and neutrophils, thereby presenting the LPS–CD14 complex to TLR4 (Fig. 3).126 TLR4 activated by LPS–CD14 complex triggers the synthesis of inflammatory cytokines via its adaptor molecules, TIRAP and MyD88, and NF-κB.126,129 Accordingly, in LPS-induced septic mouse model, lumican-deficient mice are hyporesponsive to LPS infection, exerting reduced serum levels of pro-inflammatory TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 cytokines.130 Furthermore, in mice infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, lumican binds to the bacteria and CD14 and presents the complex to TLR4, thereby driving bacterial phagocytosis (Fig. 3).131 Internalized TLR4–CD14–bacterial complex through adaptor molecules, TRIF and TRIF-related adaptor molecule (TRAM), triggers signals activating the interferon regulatory transcription factor (IRF) 3, thereby stimulating type I interferon production. In parallel, TRAM–TRIF complex promotes the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Fig. 3).132 Taken together, these studies uncover a molecule-specific role of lumican in promoting TLR4- and CD14-dependent pathogen sensing.3,126

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Lumican modulates innate immunity and inflammation via multiple pathways and influences the outcomes of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. In pathogen-mediated inflammation, lumican forms a complex with the LPS and through interaction with CD14 presents it to the TLR4, thereby triggering TIRAP/MyD88-mediated signaling that causes NF-κB activation and increased expression of inflammatory cytokines. Lumican also interacts with bacteria in a TLR4/CD14-dependent manner. Consequently, the TLR4–CD14–bacterial complex activates phagocytosis and is internalized into the endosomes. Endosomal TLR4 interacts with adaptor molecules, TRAM and TRIF, to activate IRF3, which leads to type I interferon production. The endosomal TRAM–TRIF adaptor complex, independent of IRF3, also leads to the production of inflammatory cytokines. Inflammatory cytokines are also produced by lumican binding to the Fas–FasL complex, which increases infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages. Similarly, by binding to integrin subunits β2, αM, and αL, lumican promotes PMN cell migration, which also contributes to innate immunity, inflammation, and inflammatory diseases. Lumican via interaction with MMP14 blocks the activation of MMP2 and suppresses resolution of inflammation during inflammatory diseases. In contrast, interaction of lumican with α2β1 integrin modifies FAK signaling, which inhibits MMP bioactivity and Akt and ERK1/2 downstream signaling. As Akt and ERK1/2 are involved in cyclin expression, lumican-mediated inhibition of these pathways leads to decreased cell migration and increased apoptosis, and thereby a reduction in inflammation which can have protective effects during inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Abbreviations: CD, cluster of differentiation; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; FAK, focal adhesion kinase; FasL, Fas ligand; IRF3, interferon regulatory factor 3; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; MyD88, myeloid differentiation primary response 88; TIRAP, adaptor molecule associated with Toll-like receptors; TLR, Toll-like receptor; TRIF, TIR-domain-containing adaptor-inducing interferon-β; TRAM, TRIF-related adaptor molecule; PMN, polymorphonuclear.

Besides its effect on TLR4-mediated pathogen recognition, lumican modulates inflammatory response by regulating Fas ligand (FasL)–Fas signaling (Fig. 3).111 Binding of FasL to the surface of monocytes and macrophages induces pro-inflammatory cytokine production.133 It has been shown in vitro and in a mouse model of corneal inflammation that lumican binds to FasL and facilities induction of Fas signaling. These triggers enhanced inflammatory cytokine production and recruitment of neutrophils and macrophages (Fig. 3). Accordingly, corneal injury in lumican-null mice caused lower Fas protein abundance, reduced Fas–FasL signaling, and decreased the number of infiltrating neutrophils and macrophages, followed by dampened cytokine production and delayed healing.111,134

Another mechanism of lumican-mediated regulation of the inflammatory response is related to its interaction with MAC-1 (αM/β2) and LFA-1 (αL/β2),125 the two major cell surface integrins of polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocytes (Fig. 3).125 By binding to both integrins, lumican promotes PMN leukocyte migration.125 PMN leukocytes are crucial regulators in inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.134 PMN trafficking toward the sites of inflammation is an initial phase of inflammatory diseases.127

The directional migration of PMNs through the ECM is a complex multistep process that involves several α- and β-integrin interactions with ECM proteins.127 There is strong evidence that lumican interacts with the β2, αM, and αL integrin subunits.128 It is of note that lumican was detected on the surface of peritoneal PMNs, but not on blood and bone marrow PMNs, suggesting that PMNs acquire lumican after they exit circulation.128 This suggests that lumican might be involved in PMN extravasation. Indeed, in vivo lumican has a stimulatory role in the process of PMN extravasation during the early inflammatory phase of mouse corneal epithelium healing.125

Recent reports provide evidence for a direct interaction between lumican and MMP14 (Fig. 3).135137 Lumican binds to the catalytic domain of MMP14 with an affinity of KD ~275 nM and competitively inhibits MMP14 activity.135 Furthermore, lumican downregulates the MMP14 expression in endothelial and mesenchymal stem cells.138,139 There are several hints that MMP14 interferes with the regulation of inflammatory response.136 It has been shown that MMP14 deficiency enhances pulmonary inflammation and increases mortality in neonatal endotoxemia.136 This is associated with impaired MMP2 activation and enhanced DAMP accumulation in the lungs.136 Therefore, it is conceivable that lumican-dependent inhibition of the MMP14 activity decreases resolution of inflammation (Fig. 3).

Lumican Plays Regulatory Roles in Resolution of Inflammation

Apart from its pro-inflammatory effects, lumican might also have a potential role in the modulation of cell migration and adhesion during tissue inflammation and repair via binding to α2β1 integrin and TGF-β receptor (TGFβR).140,141 It is reported that in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma cells, lumican core protein can inhibit cell migration via direct interaction with α2β1 integrin (Fig. 3).140 Through this binding, lumican restricts the focal adhesion kinase signaling, resulting in the inhibition of (1) MMP activity, (2) ERK1/2 signaling pathway, and (3) Akt signaling pathway (Fig. 3).140 Inhibition of ERK1/2 and Akt downstream signaling pathways reduces cell motility and induces apoptosis.142 Based on these observations, it is tempting to speculate that lumican plays an anti-inflammatory role through blockage of ERK1/2 and Akt pathways in inflammatory cells (Fig. 3).

Furthermore, lumican regulates adhesion of osteosarcoma cells by modulating TGF-β2/Smad2 signaling pathway.141 Although the exact mechanisms of lumican inhibition of TGF-β2 signaling are still unclear, it is known that lumican directly binds to TGFβR1 (ALK5) and promotes epithelium wound healing.143 The consequences of lumican–TGFβR1 complex formation on the binding of TGF-β to TGFβR and TGF-β downstream signaling require further investigations. As TGF-β signaling is involved directly and indirectly in almost each regulatory step of immunity and inflammation,144 it is predictable that various effects of lumican on the inflammatory response will be reported in the future.

Lumican in Inflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases

In light of the great potential of lumican to be involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, the scarcity of data in this field is surprising. It has been reported that lumican is overexpressed in ulcerative colitis induced by trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS) in mice and regulates the early stage of inflammation in the colon.145 In this model, the wild-type mice revealed an increased activation of NF-κB, which was associated with enhanced levels of CXCL1, TNF-α, and higher number of infiltrating neutrophils in the colon.145 In contrast, the TNBS-treated lumican-null mice displayed markedly reduced inflammatory response, which was associated with enhanced ulceration and necrosis in the colon.145 Overall, this study indicates a key role for lumican in maintaining intestinal homeostasis by regulating the inflammatory response and protecting tissue damage in ulcerative colitis.

Furthermore, lumican regulates the progression of MS,146 a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system.147 Accordingly, lumican-deficient mice displayed an earlier onset and enhanced disease severity in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE).146 Several studies have implicated that Th17 cells play an essential role in the development of both human MS and animal model EAE.148150 Mechanistically, lumican promotes apoptosis of Th17 cells via the Fas–FasL signaling pathway and inhibits the expression of pro-inflammatory IL-17, a Th17 cytokine.146 Thus, lumican acts as an endogenous inhibitor of Th17 cells, negatively regulating Th17 cell–mediated inflammation in MS.

Hence, lumican- and biglycan-dependent effects on Th17 cells in autoimmune diseases accentuate the major message of this review that SLRPs, in a molecule-specific manner, tightly regulate inflammation. While lumican in MS is decreasing the number of Th17 cells through their apoptotic death,146 biglycan via TLR2/TLR4 is promoting recruitment of Th17 cells in LN.13

Fibromodulin Regulates Inflammation by Interfering With the Complement and TGF-β1 Signaling Pathways

The Role of Fibromodulin in Tissue Homeostasis

Fibromodulin, a class II SLRP, is characterized by a 42-kDa protein core attached covalently to one or more keratan sulfate chains, with the entire size of the glycanated form measuring up to 82 kDa.151 Fibromodulin, initially described as a cartilage proteoglycan,152 is ubiquitously present in the ECM of connective tissues where it plays a central role in the organization of collagen fibrils.153 By interacting with lysyl oxidase, a collagen crosslinking enzyme, fibromodulin regulates the ECM composition to provide an environment favorable for cellular turnover.154 Similar to biglycan and decorin, fibromodulin regulates TGF-β1 signaling by sequestering the active form of this growth factor in the ECM.155 In addition, fibromodulin exerts various tissue-specific effects. It plays a critical role in muscle development by controlling myogenic factors and myostatin. It also promotes vasculature development and regeneration in cutaneous wound healing.156,157 For more details regarding fibromodulin structure and function, please refer to recent thematic reviews.16,47,115117,119,121,158162

Fibromodulin Exerts Pro- and Anti-inflammatory Effects by Binding to Complement and Complement Inhibitors

An increasing number of studies have demonstrated that fibromodulin plays a critical role in inflammatory diseases of the joint and influences the inflammatory response in wound healing, atherosclerosis, and heart failure.163165 However, the mechanisms of this regulation are not fully clarified.

Several studies investigating joint diseases, for example, RA and osteoarthritis, strongly implicate that fibromodulin activates the classical and alternative pathways of complement via direct binding to complement elements C1q and C3b (Fig. 4).163 C1q is a multiprotein complex critically involved in the activation of the classical complement pathway.166 In contrast, C3b, formed by the cleavage of complement component 3, is a major trigger of alternative complement pathway.167 It is well established that fibromodulin interacts with the globular heads of C1q triggering the classical complement pathway, which subsequently leads to the deposition of C3b and activation of alternative complement pathway (Fig. 4).165 The activated complement system may further contribute to adaptive and cellular immune responses through crosstalk with TLRs,168 regulation of antigen-presenting cells,169 and activation of adaptive immune cells including PMNs,170 B- and T-lymphocytes,171,172 and platelets (Fig. 4).173 Thus, fibromodulin, via binding to the complement elements C1q and C3b, triggers a plethora of immune responses.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Fibromodulin modulates innate immune response and inflammation by both complement activation and complement inhibition. Fibromodulin, via its N-terminal site, binds with the complement element C1q, which results in the deposition of C3b, and together they initiate complement activation. An inflammatory signaling cascade is triggered, which includes TLR crosstalk, APC regulation, as well as PMN, B-cell, T-cell, and platelet activation, which contributes to innate immunity and inflammation. Overactivated and unresolved inflammation leads to inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Contrarily, the binding of C4BP and FH to the fibromodulin/C1q/C3b complex leads to complement inhibition and therefore anti-inflammatory effects. Abbreviations: APC, antigen-presenting cells; C1q, complement 1q; C3b, complement 3b; C4BP, complement 4 binding protein; FH, factor H; TLR, Toll-like receptor; PMN, polymorphonuclear.

On the contrary, fibromodulin also interacts with the complement factor H (FH) and C4b-binding protein (C4BP), inhibitors of the complement system, limiting complement activation to the early part of the classical pathway (Fig. 4).144,174,175 It is of note that the binding sites on fibromodulin for C1q and FH do not overlap. The binding site for FH is localized at a position partially masked by the keratan sulfate chains, whereas C1q interacts with the N-terminal 10-kDa part of fibromodulin.164 Based on these mechanisms, it can be concluded that fibromodulin exerts anti-inflammatory effects.

Thus, it is conceivable that, under physiological conditions, fibromodulin, similar to biglycan,50 maintains a balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory responses. However, under disease conditions, this fine-tuning is disturbed and fibromodulin triggers sustained inflammation of tissues, for example, in joints.176

Even though there is no direct evidence that the soluble form of fibromodulin regulates the inflammatory response, there are some implications promoting this hypothesis. It is well known that in inflammatory joint diseases, the cartilage is degraded and fibromodulin is released into the synovial fluid.177 Furthermore, various fragments of fibromodulin bind with high affinity to either C1q or the complement inhibitors.165 Thus, it appears that soluble fibromodulin and its fragments are involved in complement-mediated regulation of inflammation.

Similar to fibromodulin, decorin and biglycan are also known regulators of the complement pathway.144,163,174,175 However, in contrast to fibromodulin, decorin and biglycan bind to the stalk of C1q, thereby inhibiting complement activity.164 Thus, SLRPs, through interactions with various complement factors, either activate or inhibit complement and tightly regulate the inflammatory response in a molecule-specific way.

Fibromodulin Modulates TGF-β1 Activity in Inflammatory Diseases

Besides regulating the inflammatory response in joint disease, fibromodulin is also involved in the inflammatory process of cutaneous wound healing.178 Studies on fetal and adult rodent wound models provided evidence that elevated fibromodulin levels correlate with decreased TGF-β1 activity.179 This is based on the ability of fibromodulin protein core to sequester TGF-β1 in the ECM.36,180 In agreement, mice lacking fibromodulin displayed abnormal wound healing, which correlates with elevated inflammatory cell infiltration and accelerated epithelial cell migration. This was accompanied by increased type I TGF-β receptor levels in individual inflammatory cells at wound sites.178,181 Similar effects can be achieved by reducing fibromodulin abundance. Proteolytic degradation of fibromodulin by MMP2, MMP8, MMP9, MMP13, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS)-4, and ADAMTS-5, decreased its abundance.182,183 For example, degradation of fibromodulin by MMP8 prevented fibromodulin–TGF-β complex formation, thereby increasing TGF-β bioavailability and M2-macrophage polarization.184

Thus, fibromodulin by sequestering TGF-β1 in the ECM prevents inflammation during would healing. Similar mechanisms were also described for decorin and biglycan.155 Based on differential localization of SLRPs in tissues,185 it appears that this is a common mechanism by which SLRPs protect various organ parts from excess of active TGF-β1.

Involvement of Fibromodulin in Inflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases

Based on various mechanisms of fibromodulin-mediated regulation of inflammation described above, a broad spectrum of diseases is expected to be influenced by this proteoglycan. However, the number of publications describing the role of fibromodulin in inflammatory and autoimmune diseases is still limited.

There is evidence that renal fibromodulin is markedly overexpressed and accumulated in patients suffering from membranous glomerulonephritis and diabetic nephropathy.108,185 Furthermore, enhanced abundance of cardiac fibromodulin was reported in human and animal model of heart failure.152,186,187 However, mice deficient in fibromodulin challenged by pressure overload displayed only mildly exacerbated hypertrophic remodeling associated with attenuated cardiac immune cell infiltration.152 Additional support for the involvement of fibromodulin in inflammatory diseases is provided by reports addressing its role in atherosclerosis.188,189 Higher fibromodulin content along with enhanced levels of inflammatory cytokines was detected in atherosclerotic plaques from patients with diabetes mellitus.189 In agreement, lack of fibromodulin in apolipoprotein E–deficient mice leads to decreased vascular lipid retention and reduced plague development.188 Furthermore, numerous studies indicate enhancement of fibromodulin in the articular cartilage under inflammatory conditions.160,176,190

Future Perspectives

It is fascinating that SLRPs, despite their structural and functional similarities, modulate innate immune and inflammatory responses in a molecule-specific manner. Although certain receptors, mediators, and signaling pathways, such as TLRs, TGFβ, and NF-κB, respectively, obviously overlap between one or more SLRPs, it is becoming increasingly clear that SLRPs select unique receptors, coreceptors, adaptor molecules, and mediators to achieve a specific cellular outcome. For example, the same SLRP can start molecular pathways triggering the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines or inhibiting them. This is achieved by either promoting or impeding the pro-inflammatory signaling mechanisms. This selection also appears to be regulated at the tissue level, as the presence of the same SLRPs, as in the case of decorin, worsens the disease phenotype in pSS but has protective effects on IBD, and this regulation is particularly important from a therapeutic point of view.

Among the 18 distinct gene products belonging to the family of SLRPs, signaling mechanisms and functional relevance of biglycan, decorin, lumican, and fibromodulin are the best characterized. Although all four SLRPs, in their soluble form, act as signaling molecules to regulate inflammation, many signaling pathways are still not completely understood. Further breakthrough in our understanding of the functional role of the proteoglycans in physiological and diseased states can be achieved by additional mechanistic studies focused on different cell lines, in vivo models, and collected patient data. For example, based on our current knowledge, we know that biglycan and decorin act as canonical ECM-derived DAMPs, and lumican appears to behave as an accessory molecule that presents pathogens to the innate immunity receptors. Additional evidence for the role of lumican as a helper molecule, and not a direct trigger, in inflammatory reactions is further provided by its role in promoting PMN migration and extravasation. An intriguing question therefore arises: Is lumican also involved in presenting ECM-DAMPs to TLRs? Identification of such novel interactions can have significant biological relevance. Similarly, the involvement of fibromodulin as part of the inflammatory response pathway is undoubted, yet mechanistic insides of these processes are not well characterized.

Growing numbers of reports demonstrate that SLRPs modulate both pro- and anti-inflammations. Even canonical DAMPs like biglycan and decorin exert anti-inflammatory effects. A common mechanism by which SLRPs inhibit inflammation is by their ability to regulate autophagy. Thus, it would be interesting to clarify whether decorin, similar to biglycan, also promotes a similar switch between inflammation and autophagy by choosing specific coreceptors of TLR4. Studies that investigate the roles of SLRP in mediating receptor crosstalk to initiate either inflammation or selective autophagy would therefore be of high interest, especially as it sheds light on our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.

Besides their regulatory role in innate immunity, all four SLRPs also play distinct roles in shaping the adaptive immune response. The contrary effects of biglycan and lumican on Th17 cells further highlight the molecule-specific role of SLRPs in immune reactions. Much is definitely still not known regarding SLRP-mediated signaling, and further research is warranted. Studies that will investigate different SLRPs in the same cellular and tissue context would provide more definitive answers to augment our overall understanding of SLRPs. Nevertheless, existing data demonstrate the complex interplay between cellular mediators and the tight regulation of molecular pathways observed in SLRP-mediated signaling. The ultimate query that needs to be answered is whether the biological role of SLRPs is to initiate or resolve inflammation, and such biological question provide a promising outlook for future studies.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author Contributions: JZ-B, SP, JT, MW and LS drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This project is supported by grants from the German Research Council (SFB 815, project A5, SFB 1039, project B02, SFB 1177, 259130777, project E02, SCHA 1082/6-1), all to L.S.; the Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), EXC 2026, Project ID: 390649896 (to L.S. and M.W.); WY119/1-3 (to M.W.), the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Foundation (to M.W.), and the German Center for Lung Research (to M.W.); European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program’s MICROBPREDICT study (No 825694), European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program GALAXY (No. 668031), Societal Challenges LIVERHOPE (Health, demographic change, and well-being, No. 731875), the German Research Council (SFB TRR57, CRC1382), and Cellex Foundation (PREDICT), all to J.T..

Contributor Information

Jinyang Zeng-Brouwers, Pharmazentrum Frankfurt/ZAFES, Institut für Allgemeine Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Sony Pandey, Pharmazentrum Frankfurt/ZAFES, Institut für Allgemeine Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Jonel Trebicka, Translational Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Clinic Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.

Malgorzata Wygrecka, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center, Giessen, Germany; German Center for Lung Research, Giessen, Germany.

Liliana Schaefer, Pharmazentrum Frankfurt/ZAFES, Institut für Allgemeine Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Literature Cited

  • 1. Gudernatsch V, Stefanczyk SA, Mirakaj V. Novel resolution mediators of severe systemic inflammation. Immunotargets Ther. 2020;9:31–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Warnatsch A, Tsourouktsoglou TD, Branzk N, Wang Q, Reincke S, Herbst S, Gutierrez M, Papayannopoulos V. Reactive oxygen species localization programs inflammation to clear microbes of different size. Immunity. 2017;46(3):421–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Schaefer L. Complexity of danger: the diverse nature of damage-associated molecular patterns. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(51):35237–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Frevert CW, Felgenhauer J, Wygrecka M, Nastase MV, Schaefer L. Danger-associated molecular patterns derived from the extracellular matrix provide temporal control of innate immunity. J Histochem Cytochem. 2018;66(4):213–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Netea MG, Balkwill F, Chonchol M, Cominelli F, Donath MY, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Golenbock D, Gresnigt MS, Heneka MT, Hoffman HM, Hotchkiss R, Joosten LAB, Kastner DL, Korte M, Latz E, Libby P, Mandrup-Poulsen T, Mantovani A, Mills KHG, Nowak KL, O'Neill LA, Pickkers P, van der Poll T, Ridker PM, Schalkwijk J, Schwartz DA, Siegmund B, Steer CJ, Tilg H, van der Meer JWM, van de Veerdonk FL, Dinarello CA. A guiding map for inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2017;18(8):826–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Fullerton JN, Gilroy DW. Resolution of inflammation: a new therapeutic frontier. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15(8):551–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Buckley CD, Gilroy DW, Serhan CN, Stockinger B, Tak PP. The resolution of inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(1):59–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Doria A, Zen M, Bettio S, Gatto M, Bassi N, Nalotto L, Ghirardello A, Iaccarino L, Punzi L. Autoinflammation and autoimmunity: bridging the divide. Autoimmun Rev. 2012;12(1):22–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Chen Z, Bozec A, Ramming A, Schett G. Anti-inflammatory and immune-regulatory cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019;15(1):9–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Nikoopour E, Schwartz JA, Singh B. Therapeutic benefits of regulating inflammation in autoimmunity. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2008;7(3):203–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Schaefer L, Babelova A, Kiss E, Hausser HJ, Baliova M, Krzyzankova M, Marsche G, Young MF, Mihalik D, Gotte M, Malle E, Schaefer RM, Grone HJ. The matrix component biglycan is proinflammatory and signals through Toll-like receptors 4 and 2 in macrophages. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(8):2223–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Merline R, Moreth K, Beckmann J, Nastase MV, Zeng-Brouwers J, Tralhao JG, Lemarchand P, Pfeilschifter J, Schaefer RM, Iozzo RV, Schaefer L. Signaling by the matrix proteoglycan decorin controls inflammation and cancer through PDCD4 and MicroRNA-21. Sci Signal. 2011;4(199):ra75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Nastase MV, Zeng-Brouwers J, Beckmann J, Tredup C, Christen U, Radeke HH, Wygrecka M, Schaefer L. Biglycan, a novel trigger of Th1 and Th17 cell recruitment into the kidney. Matrix Biol. 2018;68–69:293–317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Roedig H, Nastase MV, Frey H, Moreth K, Zeng-Brouwers J, Poluzzi C, Hsieh LT, Brandts C, Fulda S, Wygrecka M, Schaefer L. Biglycan is a new high-affinity ligand for CD14 in macrophages. Matrix Biol. 2019;77:4–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Pietraszek-Gremplewicz K, Karamanou K, Niang A, Dauchez M, Belloy N, Maquart FX, Baud S, Brezillon S. Small leucine-rich proteoglycans and matrix metalloproteinase-14: key partners? Matrix Biol. 2019;75–76:271–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Iozzo RV, Schaefer L. Proteoglycan form and function: a comprehensive nomenclature of proteoglycans. Matrix Biol. 2015;42:11–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Schaefer L, Iozzo RV. Biological functions of the small leucine-rich proteoglycans: from genetics to signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(31):21305–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Nikitovic D, Aggelidakis J, Young MF, Iozzo RV, Karamanos NK, Tzanakakis GN. The biology of small leucine-rich proteoglycans in bone pathophysiology. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(41):33926–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Schaefer L, Schaefer RM. Proteoglycans: from structural compounds to signaling molecules. Cell Tissue Res. 2010;339(1):237–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Schaefer L. Extracellular matrix molecules: endogenous danger signals as new drug targets in kidney diseases. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2010;10(2):185–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Nastase MV, Young MF, Schaefer L. Biglycan: a multivalent proteoglycan providing structure and signals. J Histochem Cytochem. 2012;60(12):963–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Frey H, Schroeder N, Manon-Jensen T, Iozzo RV, Schaefer L. Biological interplay between proteoglycans and their innate immune receptors in inflammation. FEBS J. 2013;280(10):2165–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Schaefer L, Tredup C, Gubbiotti MA, Iozzo RV. Proteoglycan neofunctions: regulation of inflammation and autophagy in cancer biology. FEBS J. 2017;284(1):10–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Nastase MV, Janicova A, Wygrecka M, Schaefer L. Signaling at the crossroads: matrix-derived proteoglycan and reactive oxygen species signaling. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2017;27(12):855–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Roedig H, Damiescu R, Zeng-Brouwers J, Kutija I, Trebicka J, Wygrecka M, Schaefer L. Danger matrix molecules orchestrate CD14/CD44 signaling in cancer development. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020;62:31–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Schaefer L, Reinhardt DP. Special issue: extracellular matrix: therapeutic tools and targets in cancer treatment. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;97:1–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Wiberg C, Hedbom E, Khairullina A, Lamande SR, Oldberg A, Timpl R, Morgelin M, Heinegard D. Biglycan and decorin bind close to the n-terminal region of the collagen VI triple helix. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(22):18947–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Wiberg C, Klatt AR, Wagener R, Paulsson M, Bateman JF, Heinegard D, Morgelin M. Complexes of matrilin-1 and biglycan or decorin connect collagen VI microfibrils to both collagen II and aggrecan. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(39):37698–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Douglas T, Heinemann S, Bierbaum S, Scharnweber D, Worch H. Fibrillogenesis of collagen types I, II, and III with small leucine-rich proteoglycans decorin and biglycan. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7(8):2388–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Reinboth B, Hanssen E, Cleary EG, Gibson MA. Molecular interactions of biglycan and decorin with elastic fiber components: biglycan forms a ternary complex with tropoelastin and microfibril-associated glycoprotein 1. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(6):3950–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Bianco P, Fisher LW, Young MF, Termine JD, Robey PG. Expression and localization of the two small proteoglycans biglycan and decorin in developing human skeletal and non-skeletal tissues. J Histochem Cytochem. 1990;38(11):1549–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Moreth K, Brodbeck R, Babelova A, Gretz N, Spieker T, Zeng-Brouwers J, Pfeilschifter J, Young MF, Schaefer RM, Schaefer L. The proteoglycan biglycan regulates expression of the B cell chemoattractant CXCL13 and aggravates murine lupus nephritis. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(12):4251–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Nastase MV, Janicova A, Roedig H, Hsieh LT, Wygrecka M, Schaefer L. Small leucine-rich proteoglycans in renal inflammation: two sides of the coin. J Histochem Cytochem. 2018;66(4):261–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Poluzzi C, Nastase MV, Zeng-Brouwers J, Roedig H, Hsieh LT, Michaelis JB, Buhl EM, Rezende F, Manavski Y, Bleich A, Boor P, Brandes RP, Pfeilschifter J, Stelzer EHK, Munch C, Dikic I, Brandts C, Iozzo RV, Wygrecka M, Schaefer L. Biglycan evokes autophagy in macrophages via a novel CD44/Toll-like receptor 4 signaling axis in ischemia/reperfusion injury. Kidney Int. 2019;95(3):540–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Moreth K, Iozzo RV, Schaefer L. Small leucine-rich proteoglycans orchestrate receptor crosstalk during inflammation. Cell Cycle. 2012;11(11):2084–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Hildebrand A, Romaris M, Rasmussen LM, Heinegard D, Twardzik DR, Border WA, Ruoslahti E. Interaction of the small interstitial proteoglycans biglycan, decorin and fibromodulin with transforming growth factor beta. Biochem J. 1994;302(Pt2):527–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Chen XD, Fisher LW, Robey PG, Young MF. The small leucine-rich proteoglycan biglycan modulates BMP-4-induced osteoblast differentiation. FASEB J. 2004;18(9):948–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Mochida Y, Parisuthiman D, Yamauchi M. Biglycan is a positive modulator of BMP-2 induced osteoblast differentiation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2006;585:101–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Desnoyers L, Arnott D, Pennica D. WISP-1 binds to decorin and biglycan. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(50):47599–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Zeng-Brouwers J, Beckmann J, Nastase MV, Iozzo RV, Schaefer L. De novo expression of circulating biglycan evokes an innate inflammatory tissue response via MyD88/TRIF pathways. Matrix Biol. 2014;35:132–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Babelova A, Moreth K, Tsalastra-Greul W, Zeng-Brouwers J, Eickelberg O, Young MF, Bruckner P, Pfeilschifter J, Schaefer RM, Grone HJ, Schaefer L. Biglycan, a danger signal that activates the NLRP3 inflammasome via toll-like and P2X receptors. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(36):24035–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Popovic MR, Kapadia N, Zivanovic V, Furlan JC, Craven BC, McGillivray C. Functional electrical stimulation therapy of voluntary grasping versus only conventional rehabilitation for patients with subacute incomplete tetraplegia: a randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(5):433–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Merline R, Schaefer RM, Schaefer L. The matricellular functions of small leucine-rich proteoglycans (SLRPs). J Cell Commun Signal. 2009;3(3–4):323–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Schaefer L. Small leucine-rich proteoglycans in kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(7):1200–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Anders HJ, Schaefer L. Beyond tissue injury-damage-associated molecular patterns, toll-like receptors, and inflammasomes also drive regeneration and fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(7):1387–400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Myren M, Kirby DJ, Noonan ML, Maeda A, Owens RT, Ricard-Blum S, Kram V, Kilts TM, Young MF. Biglycan potentially regulates angiogenesis during fracture repair by altering expression and function of endostatin. Matrix Biol. 2016;52–54:141–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Kram V, Kilts TM, Bhattacharyya N, Li L, Young MF. Small leucine rich proteoglycans, a novel link to osteoclastogenesis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):12627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Fallon JR, McNally EM. Non-glycanated biglycan and LTBP4: leveraging the extracellular matrix for duchenne muscular dystrophy therapeutics. Matrix Biol. 2018;68–69:616–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Moreth K, Frey H, Hubo M, Zeng-Brouwers J, Nastase MV, Hsieh LT, Haceni R, Pfeilschifter J, Iozzo RV, Schaefer L. Biglycan-triggered TLR-2- and TLR-4-signaling exacerbates the pathophysiology of ischemic acute kidney injury. Matrix Biol. 2014;35:143–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Hsieh LT, Frey H, Nastase MV, Tredup C, Hoffmann A, Poluzzi C, Zeng-Brouwers J, Manon-Jensen T, Schroder K, Brandes RP, Iozzo RV, Schaefer L. Bimodal role of NADPH oxidases in the regulation of biglycan-triggered IL-1beta synthesis. Matrix Biol. 2016;49:61–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Hsieh LT, Nastase MV, Roedig H, Zeng-Brouwers J, Poluzzi C, Schwalm S, Fork C, Tredup C, Brandes RP, Wygrecka M, Huwiler A, Pfeilschifter J, Schaefer L. Biglycan- and sphingosine kinase-1 signaling crosstalk regulates the synthesis of macrophage chemoattractants. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Roedig H, Nastase MV, Wygrecka M, Schaefer L. Breaking down chronic inflammatory diseases: the role of biglycan in promoting a switch between inflammation and autophagy. FEBS J. 2019;286(15):2965–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Popovic ZV, Wang S, Papatriantafyllou M, Kaya Z, Porubsky S, Meisner M, Bonrouhi M, Burgdorf S, Young MF, Schaefer L, Grone HJ. The proteoglycan biglycan enhances antigen-specific T cell activation potentially via MyD88 and TRIF pathways and triggers autoimmune perimyocarditis. J Immunol. 2011;187(12):6217–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Hsieh LT, Nastase MV, Zeng-Brouwers J, Iozzo RV, Schaefer L. Soluble biglycan as a biomarker of inflammatory renal diseases. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2014;54:223–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Barreto G, Soininen A, Ylinen P, Sandelin J, Konttinen YT, Nordstrom DC, Eklund KK. Soluble biglycan: a potential mediator of cartilage degradation in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Polgar A, Falus A, Koo E, Ujfalussy I, Seszták M, Szuts I, Konrád K, Hodinka L, Bene E, Mészáros G, Ortutay Z, Farkas E, Paksy A, Buzás EI. Elevated levels of synovial fluid antibodies reactive with the small proteoglycans biglycan and decorin in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or other joint diseases. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003;42(4):522–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Antipova O, Orgel JP. Non-enzymatic decomposition of collagen fibers by a biglycan antibody and a plausible mechanism for rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(3):e32241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Genovese F, Barascuk N, Larsen L, Larsen MR, Nawrocki A, Li Y, Zheng Q, Wang J, Veidal SS, Leeming DJ, Karsdal MA. Biglycan fragmentation in pathologies associated with extracellular matrix remodeling by matrix metalloproteinases. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2013;6(1):9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Fisher LW, Termine JD, Young MF. Deduced protein sequence of bone small proteoglycan I (biglycan) shows homology with proteoglycan II (decorin) and several nonconnective tissue proteins in a variety of species. J Biol Chem. 1989;264(8):4571–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Chen S, Birk DE. Focus on molecules: decorin. Exp Eye Res. 2011;92(6):444–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Reed CC, Iozzo RV. The role of decorin in collagen fibrillogenesis and skin homeostasis. Glycoconj J. 2002;19(4–5):249–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Ruhland C, Schonherr E, Robenek H, Hansen U, Iozzo RV, Bruckner P, Seidler DG. The glycosaminoglycan chain of decorin plays an important role in collagen fibril formation at the early stages of fibrillogenesis. FEBS J. 2007;274(16):4246–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Robinson PS, Lin TW, Jawad AF, Iozzo RV, Soslowsky LJ. Investigating tendon fascicle structure-function relationships in a transgenic-age mouse model using multiple regression models. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004;32(7):924–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Sanches JC, Jones CJ, Aplin JD, Iozzo RV, Zorn TM, Oliveira SF. Collagen fibril organization in the pregnant endometrium of decorin-deficient mice. J Anat. 2010;216(1):144–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Weber IT, Harrison RW, Iozzo RV. Model structure of decorin and implications for collagen fibrillogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(50):31767–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Jarvelainen H, Sainio A, Wight TN. Pivotal role for decorin in angiogenesis. Matrix Biol. 2015;43:15–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Neill T, Painter H, Buraschi S, Owens RT, Lisanti MP, Schaefer L, Iozzo RV. Decorin antagonizes the angiogenic network: concurrent inhibition of Met, hypoxia inducible factor 1alpha, vascular endothelial growth factor A, and induction of thrombospondin-1 and TIMP3. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(8):5492–506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Weis SM, Zimmerman SD, Shah M, Covell JW, Omens JH, Ross J, Jr, Dalton N, Jones Y, Reed CC, Iozzo RV, McCulloch AD. A role for decorin in the remodeling of myocardial infarction. Matrix Biol. 2005;24(4):313–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Baghy K, Iozzo RV, Kovalszky I. Decorin-TGFbeta axis in hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis. J Histochem Cytochem. 2012;60(4):262–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Jarvelainen H, Puolakkainen P, Pakkanen S, Brown EL, Hook M, Iozzo RV, Sage EH, Wight TN. A role for decorin in cutaneous wound healing and angiogenesis. Wound Repair Regen. 2006;14(4):443–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Gubbiotti MA, Neill T, Frey H, Schaefer L, Iozzo RV. Decorin is an autophagy-inducible proteoglycan and is required for proper in vivo autophagy. Matrix Biol. 2015;48:14–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Neill T, Torres A, Buraschi S, Iozzo RV. Decorin has an appetite for endothelial cell autophagy. Autophagy. 2013;9(10):1626–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Buraschi S, Neill T, Goyal A, Poluzzi C, Smythies J, Owens RT, Schaefer L, Torres A, Iozzo RV. Decorin causes autophagy in endothelial cells via Peg3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(28):E2582–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Goyal A, Neill T, Owens RT, Schaefer L, Iozzo RV. Reprint of: decorin activates AMPK, an energy sensor kinase, to induce autophagy in endothelial cells. Matrix Biol. 2014;35:42–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Gubbiotti MA, Iozzo RV. Proteoglycans regulate autophagy via outside-in signaling: an emerging new concept. Matrix Biol. 2015;48:6–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Gubbiotti MA, Vallet SD, Ricard-Blum S, Iozzo RV. Decorin interacting network: a comprehensive analysis of decorin-binding partners and their versatile functions. Matrix Biol. 2016;55:7–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Neill T, Schaefer L, Iozzo RV. Decorin: a guardian from the matrix. Am J Pathol. 2012;181(2):380–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Svensson L, Heinegard D, Oldberg A. Decorin-binding sites for collagen type I are mainly located in leucine-rich repeats 4-5. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(35):20712–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Neill T, Schaefer L, Iozzo RV. Decorin as a multivalent therapeutic agent against cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;97:174–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Bi XL, Yang W. Biological functions of decorin in cancer. Chin J Cancer. 2013;32(5):266–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Zhang W, Ge Y, Cheng Q, Zhang Q, Fang L, Zheng J. Decorin is a pivotal effector in the extracellular matrix and tumour microenvironment. Oncotarget. 2018;9(4):5480–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Sainio AO, Jarvelainen HT. Decorin—mediated oncosuppression—a potential future adjuvant therapy for human epithelial cancers. Br J Pharmacol. 2019;176(1):5–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Jiang Y, Gao Q, Wang L, Guo C, Zhu F, Wang B, Wang Q, Gao F, Chen Y, Zhang L. Deficiency of programmed cell death 4 results in increased IL-10 expression by macrophages and thereby attenuates atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic mice. Cell Mol Immunol. 2016;13(4):524–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Asangani IA, Rasheed SA, Nikolova DA, Leupold JH, Colburn NH, Post S, Allgayer H. MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) post-transcriptionally downregulates tumor suppressor Pdcd4 and stimulates invasion, intravasation and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2008;27(15):2128–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. van den Bosch MW, Palsson-Mcdermott E, Johnson DS, O’Neill LA. LPS induces the degradation of programmed cell death protein 4 (PDCD4) to release Twist2, activating c-Maf transcription to promote interleukin-10 production. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(33):22980–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Neill T, Schaefer L, Iozzo RV. Decoding the matrix: instructive roles of proteoglycan receptors. Biochemistry. 2015;54(30):4583–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 2010;140(6):883–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Neill T, Schaefer L, Iozzo RV. Oncosuppressive functions of decorin. Mol Cell Oncol. 2015;2(3):e975645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Buraschi S, Neill T, Iozzo RV. Decorin is a devouring proteoglycan: remodeling of intracellular catabolism via autophagy and mitophagy. Matrix Biol. 2019;75–76:260–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Gubbiotti MA, Buraschi S, Kapoor A, Iozzo RV. Proteoglycan signaling in tumor angiogenesis and endothelial cell autophagy. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020;62:1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Koninger J, Giese NA, Bartel M, di Mola FF, Berberat PO, di Sebastiano P, Giese T, Buchler MW, Friess H. The ECM proteoglycan decorin links desmoplasia and inflammation in chronic pancreatitis. J Clin Pathol. 2006;59(1):21–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Seidler DG, Mohamed NA, Bocian C, Stadtmann A, Hermann S, Schafers K, Schafers M, Iozzo RV, Zarbock A, Gotte M. The role for decorin in delayed-type hypersensitivity. J Immunol. 2011;187(11):6108–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Bocian C, Urbanowitz AK, Owens RT, Iozzo RV, Gotte M, Seidler DG. Decorin potentiates interferon-gamma activity in a model of allergic inflammation. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(18):12699–711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Borges MC, Narayanan V, Iozzo RV, Ludwig MS. Deficiency of decorin induces expression of Foxp3 in CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells in a murine model of allergic asthma. Respirology. 2015;20(6):904–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Marchica CL, Pinelli V, Borges M, Zummer J, Narayanan V, Iozzo RV, Ludwig MS. A role for decorin in a murine model of allergen-induced asthma. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2011;300(6):L863–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Buraschi S, Neill T, Owens RT, Iniguez LA, Purkins G, Vadigepalli R, Evans B, Schaefer L, Peiper SC, Wang ZX, Iozzo RV. Decorin protein core affects the global gene expression profile of the tumor microenvironment in a triple-negative orthotopic breast carcinoma xenograft model. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(9):e45559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Kiripolsky J, Romano RA, Kasperek EM, Yu G, Kramer JM. Activation of Myd88-dependent TLRs mediates local and systemic inflammation in a mouse model of primary Sjogren’s Syndrome. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Kiripolsky J, McCabe LG, Kramer JM. Innate immunity in Sjogren’s syndrome. Clinical Immunol. 2017;182:4–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Malladi AS, Sack KE, Shiboski SC, Shiboski CH, Baer AN, Banushree R, Dong Y, Helin P, Kirkham BW, Li M, Sugai S, Umehara H, Vivino FB, Vollenweider CF, Zhang W, Zhao Y, Greenspan JS, Daniels TE, Criswell LA. Primary Sjogren’s syndrome as a systemic disease: a study of participants enrolled in an international Sjogren’s syndrome registry. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(6):911–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Yamachika S, Brayer J, Oxford GE, Peck AB, Humphreys-Beher MG. Aberrant proteolytic digestion of biglycan and decorin by saliva and exocrine gland lysates from the NOD mouse model for autoimmune exocrinopathy. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2000;18(2):233–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Zhao H, Xi H, Wei B, Cai A, Wang T, Wang Y, Zhao X, Song Y, Chen L. Expression of decorin in intestinal tissues of mice with inflammatory bowel disease and its correlation with autophagy. Exp Ther Med. 2016;12(6):3885–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Strober W, Fuss IJ. Proinflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(6):1756–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Brezillon S, Pietraszek K, Maquart FX, Wegrowski Y. Lumican effects in the control of tumour progression and their links with metalloproteinases and integrins. FEBS J. 2013;280(10):2369–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Chakravarti S, Magnuson T, Lass JH, Jepsen KJ, LaMantia C, Carroll H. Lumican regulates collagen fibril assembly: skin fragility and corneal opacity in the absence of lumican. J Cell Biol. 1998;141(5):1277–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Iozzo RV. The family of the small leucine-rich proteoglycans: key regulators of matrix assembly and cellular growth. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1997;32(2):141–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Dunlevy JR, Neame PJ, Vergnes JP, Hassell JR. Identification of the N-linked oligosaccharide sites in chick corneal lumican and keratocan that receive keratan sulfate. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(16):9615–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Dolhnikoff M, Morin J, Roughley PJ, Ludwig MS. Expression of lumican in human lungs. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1998;19(4):582–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Schaefer L, Grone HJ, Raslik I, Robenek H, Ugorcakova J, Budny S, Schaefer RM, Kresse H. Small proteoglycans of normal adult human kidney: distinct expression patterns of decorin, biglycan, fibromodulin, and lumican. Kidney Int. 2000;58(4):1557–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Hayashida Y, Akama TO, Beecher N, Lewis P, Young RD, Meek KM, Kerr B, Hughes CE, Caterson B, Tanigami A, Nakayama J, Fukada MN, Tano Y, Nishida K, Quantock AJ. Matrix morphogenesis in cornea is mediated by the modification of keratan sulfate by GlcNAc 6-O-sulfotransferase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(36):13333–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Ying S, Shiraishi A, Kao CW, Converse RL, Funderburgh JL, Swiergiel J, Roth MR, Conrad GW, Kao WW. Characterization and expression of the mouse lumican gene. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(48):30306–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Vij N, Roberts L, Joyce S, Chakravarti S. Lumican regulates corneal inflammatory responses by modulating Fas-Fas ligand signaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(1):88–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Saika S, Miyamoto T, Tanaka S, Tanaka T, Ishida I, Ohnishi Y, Ooshima A, Ishiwata T, Asano G, Chikama T, Shiraishi A, Liu CY, Kao CW, Kao WW. Response of lens epithelial cells to injury: role of lumican in epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(5):2094–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Vuillermoz B, Khoruzhenko A, D’Onofrio MF, Ramont L, Venteo L, Perreau C, Antonicelli F, Maquart FX, Wegrowski Y. The small leucine-rich proteoglycan lumican inhibits melanoma progression. Exp Cell Res. 2004;296(2):294–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Albig AR, Roy TG, Becenti DJ, Schiemann WP. Transcriptome analysis of endothelial cell gene expression induced by growth on matrigel matrices: identification and characterization of MAGP-2 and lumican as novel regulators of angiogenesis. Angiogenesis. 2007;10(3):197–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Hultgardh-Nilsson A, Boren J, Chakravarti S. The small leucine-rich repeat proteoglycans in tissue repair and atherosclerosis. J Intern Med. 2015;278(5):447–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Baghy K, Tatrai P, Regos E, Kovalszky I. Proteoglycans in liver cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(1):379–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Frikeche J, Maiti G, Chakravarti S. Small leucine-rich repeat proteoglycans in corneal inflammation and wound healing. Experimental Eye Research. 2016;151:142–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Kao WW, Funderburgh JL, Xia Y, Liu CY, Conrad GW. Focus on molecules: lumican. Exp Eye Res. 2006;82(1):3–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Wight TN. A role for proteoglycans in vascular disease. Matrix Biol. 2018;71–72:396–420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Karamanou K, Perrot G, Maquart FX, Brezillon S. Lumican as a multivalent effector in wound healing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;129:344–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Matsushima N, Takatsuka S, Miyashita H, Kretsinger RH. Leucine rich repeat proteins: sequences, mutations, structures and diseases. Protein Pept Lett. 2019;26(2):108–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Appunni S, Anand V, Khandelwal M, Gupta N, Rubens M, Sharma A. Small leucine rich proteoglycans (decorin, biglycan and lumican) in cancer. Clin Chim Acta. 2019;491:1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Karamanou K, Franchi M, Onisto M, Passi A, Vynios DH, Brezillon S. Evaluation of lumican effects on morphology of invading breast cancer cells, expression of integrins and downstream signaling. FEBS J. Epub 2020 Mar 11. doi: 10.1111/febs.15289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Walimbe T, Panitch A. Proteoglycans in biomedicine: resurgence of an underexploited class of ECM molecules. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Hayashi Y, Call MK, Chikama T, Liu H, Carlson EC, Sun Y, Pearlman E, Funderburgh JL, Babcock G, Liu CY, Ohashi Y, Kao WW. Lumican is required for neutrophil extravasation following corneal injury and wound healing. J Cell Sci. 2010;123(Pt 17):2987–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Wu F, Vij N, Roberts L, Lopez-Briones S, Joyce S, Chakravarti S. A novel role of the lumican core protein in bacterial lipopolysaccharide-induced innate immune response. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(36):26409–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Rosales C. Neutrophil: a cell with many roles in inflammation or several cell types? Front Physiol. 2018;9:113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Lee S, Bowrin K, Hamad AR, Chakravarti S. Extracellular matrix lumican deposited on the surface of neutrophils promotes migration by binding to beta2 integrin. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(35):23662–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Verstak B, Nagpal K, Bottomley SP, Golenbock DT, Hertzog PJ, Mansell A. MyD88 adapter-like (Mal)/TIRAP interaction with TRAF6 is critical for TLR2- and TLR4-mediated NF-kappaB proinflammatory responses. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(36):24192–203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Lu XM, Ma L, Jin YN, Yu YQ. Lumican overexpression exacerbates lipopolysaccharide-induced renal injury in mice. Mol Med Rep. 2015;12(3):4089–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Shao H, Lee S, Gae-Scott S, Nakata C, Chen S, Hamad AR, Chakravarti S. Extracellular matrix lumican promotes bacterial phagocytosis, and Lum−/− mice show increased Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection severity. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(43):35860–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Skjesol A, Yurchenko M, Bosl K, Gravastrand C, Nilsen KE, Grovdal LM, Agliano F, Patane F, Lentini G, Kim H, Teti G, Kumar Sharma A, Kandasamy RK, Sporsheim B, Starheim KK, Golenbock DT, Stenmark H, McCaffrey M, Espevik T, Husebye H. The TLR4 adaptor TRAM controls the phagocytosis of Gram-negative bacteria by interacting with the Rab11-family interacting protein 2. Plos Pathog. 2019;15(3):e1007684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Park DR, Thomsen AR, Frevert CW, Pham U, Skerrett SJ, Kiener PA, Liles WC. Fas (CD95) induces proinflammatory cytokine responses by human monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages. J Immunol. 2003;170(12):6209–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Brazil JC, Louis NA, Parkos CA. The role of polymorphonuclear leukocyte trafficking in the perpetuation of inflammation during inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19(7):1556–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Pietraszek K, Chatron-Colliet A, Brezillon S, Perreau C, Jakubiak-Augustyn A, Krotkiewski H, Maquart FX, Wegrowski Y. Lumican: a new inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-14 activity. FEBS Lett. 2014;588(23):4319–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Aguirre A, Blazquez-Prieto J, Amado-Rodriguez L, Lopez-Alonso I, Batalla-Solis E, Gonzalez-Lopez A, Sanchez-Perez M, Mayoral-Garcia C, Gutierrez-Fernandez A, Albaiceta GM. Matrix metalloproteinase-14 triggers an anti-inflammatory proteolytic cascade in endotoxemia. J Mol Med (Berl). 2017;95(5):487–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Page-McCaw A, Ewald AJ, Werb Z. Matrix metalloproteinases and the regulation of tissue remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8(3):221–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Niewiarowska J, Brezillon S, Sacewicz-Hofman I, Bednarek R, Maquart FX, Malinowski M, Wiktorska M, Wegrowski Y, Cierniewski CS. Lumican inhibits angiogenesis by interfering with alpha2beta1 receptor activity and downregulating MMP-14 expression. Thromb Res. 2011;128(5):452–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Malinowski M, Pietraszek K, Perreau C, Boguslawski M, Decot V, Stoltz JF, Vallar L, Niewiarowska J, Cierniewski C, Maquart FX, Wegrowski Y, Brezillon S. Effect of lumican on the migration of human mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells: involvement of matrix metalloproteinase-14. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e50709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Zeltz C, Brezillon S, Kapyla J, Eble JA, Bobichon H, Terryn C, Perreau C, Franz CM, Heino J, Maquart FX, Wegrowski Y. Lumican inhibits cell migration through alpha2beta1 integrin. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316(17):2922–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Nikitovic D, Chalkiadaki G, Berdiaki A, Aggelidakis J, Katonis P, Karamanos NK, Tzanakakis GN. Lumican regulates osteosarcoma cell adhesion by modulating TGFbeta2 activity. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2011;43(6):928–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Lu Z, Xu S. ERK1/2 MAP kinases in cell survival and apoptosis. IUBMB Life. 2006;58(11):621–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Yamanaka O, Yuan Y, Coulson-Thomas VJ, Gesteira TF, Call MK, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Chang SH, Xie C, Liu CY, Saika S, Jester JV, Kao WW. Lumican binds ALK5 to promote epithelium wound healing. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12):e82730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Meri S, Pangburn MK. Discrimination between activators and nonactivators of the alternative pathway of complement: regulation via a sialic acid/polyanion binding site on factor H. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87(10):3982–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Lohr K, Sardana H, Lee S, Wu F, Huso DL, Hamad AR, Chakravarti S. Extracellular matrix protein lumican regulates inflammation in a mouse model of colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18(1):143–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Castillo EF, Zheng H, Van Cabanlong C, Dong F, Luo Y, Yang Y, Liu M, Kao WW, Yang XO. Lumican negatively controls the pathogenicity of murine encephalitic TH17 cells. Eur J Immunol. 2016;46(12):2852–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Kawakami N, Bartholomaus I, Pesic M, Mues M. An autoimmunity odyssey: how autoreactive T cells infiltrate into the CNS. Immunol Rev. 2012;248(1):140–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Korn T, Bettelli E, Oukka M, Kuchroo VK. IL-17 and Th17 cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:485–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Sie C, Korn T, Mitsdoerffer M. Th17 cells in central nervous system autoimmunity. Exp Neurol. 2014;262(PtA):18–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. van Langelaar J, van der Vuurst de Vries RM, Janssen M, Wierenga-Wolf AF, Spilt IM, Siepman TA, Dankers W, Verjans GMGM, de Vries HE, Lubberts E, Hintzen RQ, van Luijn MM. T helper 17.1 cells associate with multiple sclerosis disease activity: perspectives for early intervention. Brain. 2018;141(5):1334–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Oldberg A, Antonsson P, Lindblom K, Heinegard D. A collagen-binding 59-kd protein (fibromodulin) is structurally related to the small interstitial proteoglycans PG-S1 and PG-S2 (decorin). EMBO J. 1989;8(9):2601–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Andenaes K, Lunde IG, Mohammadzadeh N, Dahl CP, Aronsen JM, Strand ME, Palmero S, Sjaastad I, Christensen G, Engebretsen KVT, Tonnessen T. The extracellular matrix proteoglycan fibromodulin is upregulated in clinical and experimental heart failure and affects cardiac remodeling. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7):e0201422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Lee YH, Schiemann WP. Fibromodulin suppresses nuclear factor-kappaB activity by inducing the delayed degradation of IKBA via a JNK-dependent pathway coupled to fibroblast apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(8):6414–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Kalamajski S, Bihan D, Bonna A, Rubin K, Farndale RW. Fibromodulin interacts with collagen cross-linking sites and activates lysyl oxidase. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(15):7951–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Burton-Wurster N, Liu W, Matthews GL, Lust G, Roughley PJ, Glant TT, Cs-Szabo G. TGF beta 1 and biglycan, decorin, and fibromodulin metabolism in canine cartilage. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2003;11(3):167–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Lee EJ, Jan AT, Baig MH, Ashraf JM, Nahm SS, Kim YW, Park SY, Choi I. Fibromodulin: a master regulator of myostatin controlling progression of satellite cells through a myogenic program. FASEB J. 2016;30(8):2708–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Zheng Z, Jian J, Velasco O, Hsu CY, Zhang K, Levin A, Murphy M, Zhang X, Ting K, Soo C. Fibromodulin enhances angiogenesis during cutaneous wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014;2(12):e275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Halper J. Proteoglycans and diseases of soft tissues. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;802:49–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Jan AT, Lee EJ, Choi I. Fibromodulin: a regulatory molecule maintaining cellular architecture for normal cellular function. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2016;80:66–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Al-Qattan MM, Al-Qattan AM. Fibromodulin: structure, physiological functions, and an emphasis on its potential clinical applications in various diseases. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2018;28(10):783–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Pourhanifeh MH, Mohammadi R, Noruzi S, Hosseini SA, Fanoudi S, Mohamadi Y, Hashemzehi M, Asemi Z, Mirzaei HR, Salarinia R, Mirzaei H. The role of fibromodulin in cancer pathogenesis: implications for diagnosis and therapy. Cancer Cell Int. 2019;19:157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Pang X, Dong N, Zheng Z. Small leucine-rich proteoglycans in skin wound healing. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Silawal S, Triebel J, Bertsch T, Schulze-Tanzil G. Osteoarthritis and the complement cascade. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;11:1179544117751430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Groeneveld TW, Oroszlan M, Owens RT, Faber-Krol MC, Bakker AC, Arlaud GJ, McQuillan DJ, Kishore U, Daha MR, Roos A. Interactions of the extracellular matrix proteoglycans decorin and biglycan with C1q and collectins. J Immunol. 2005;175(7):4715–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Sjoberg A, Onnerfjord P, Morgelin M, Heinegard D, Blom AM. The extracellular matrix and inflammation: fibromodulin activates the classical pathway of complement by directly binding C1q. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(37):32301–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Gaboriaud C, Thielens NM, Gregory LA, Rossi V, Fontecilla-Camps JC, Arlaud GJ. Structure and activation of the C1 complex of complement: unraveling the puzzle. Trends Immunol. 2004;25(7):368–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Ricklin D, Lambris JD. Complement in immune and inflammatory disorders: pathophysiological mechanisms. J Immunol. 2013;190(8):3831–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Shahini N, Schjalm C, Nilsson PH, Holt MF, Øgaard JDS, Lien E, Ahmed MS, Attramadal H, Aukrust P, Yndestad A, Mollnes TE, Louwe MC. Complement component C3 and the TLR co-receptor CD14 are not involved in angiotensin II induced cardiac remodelling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;523(4):867–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Kwan WH, Hashimoto D, Paz-Artal E, Ostrow K, Greter M, Raedler H, Medof ME, Merad M, Heeger PS. Antigen-presenting cell-derived complement modulates graft-versus-host disease. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(6):2234–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Lubbers R, van Essen MF, van Kooten C, Trouw LA. Production of complement components by cells of the immune system. Clin Exp Immunol. 2017;188(2):183–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Heeger PS, Kemper C. Novel roles of complement in T effector cell regulation. Immunobiology. 2012;217(2):216–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Killick J, Morisse G, Sieger D, Astier AL. Complement as a regulator of adaptive immunity. Semin Immunopathol. 2018;40(1):37–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Hamad OA, Back J, Nilsson PH, Nilsson B, Ekdahl KN. Platelets, complement, and contact activation: partners in inflammation and thrombosis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;946:185–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Happonen KE, Sjoberg AP, Morgelin M, Heinegard D, Blom AM. Complement inhibitor C4b-binding protein interacts directly with small glycoproteins of the extracellular matrix. J Immunol. 2009;182(3):1518–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Blom AM, Kask L, Dahlback B. CCP1-4 of the C4b-binding protein alpha-chain are required for factor I mediated cleavage of complement factor C3b. Mol Immunol. 2003;39(10):547–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Li C, Ha P, Jiang W, Haveles CS, Zheng Z, Zou M. Fibromodulin—a new target of osteoarthritis management? Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Brink P, Smith RK, Tverdal A, Dolvik NI. Changes in synovial fluid biomarker concentrations following arthroscopic surgery in horses with osteochondritis dissecans of the distal intermediate ridge of the tibia. Am J Vet Res. 2015;76(7):599–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Zheng Z, Zhang X, Dang C, Beanes S, Chang GX, Chen Y, Li CS, Lee KS, Ting K, Soo C. Fibromodulin is essential for fetal-type scarless cutaneous wound healing. Am J Pathol. 2016;186(11):2824–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Penn JW, Grobbelaar AO, Rolfe KJ. The role of the TGF-beta family in wound healing, burns and scarring: a review. Int J Burns Trauma. 2012;2(1):18–28. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Dawoody Nejad L, Biglari A, Annese T, Ribatti D. Recombinant fibromodulin and decorin effects on NF-kappaB and TGFbeta1 in the 4T1 breast cancer cell line. Oncol Lett. 2017;13(6):4475–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Zheng Z, Lee KS, Zhang X, Nguyen C, Hsu C, Wang JZ, Rackohn TM, Enjamuri DR, Murphy M, Ting K, Soo C. Fibromodulin-deficiency alters temporospatial expression patterns of transforming growth factor-beta ligands and receptors during adult mouse skin wound healing. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e90817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Shu CC, Flannery CR, Little CB, Melrose J. Catabolism of fibromodulin in developmental rudiment and pathologic articular cartilage demonstrates novel roles for MMP-13 and ADAMTS-4 in C-terminal processing of SLRPs. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. Heathfield TF, Onnerfjord P, Dahlberg L, Heinegard D. Cleavage of fibromodulin in cartilage explants involves removal of the N-terminal tyrosine sulfate-rich region by proteolysis at a site that is sensitive to matrix metalloproteinase-13. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(8):6286–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184. Wen G, Zhang C, Chen Q, Luong le A, Mustafa A, Ye S, Xiao Q. A novel role of matrix metalloproteinase-8 in macrophage differentiation and polarization. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(31):19158–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185. Schaefer L, Raslik I, Grone HJ, Schonherr E, Macakova K, Ugorcakova J, Budny S, Schaefer RM, Kresse H. Small proteoglycans in human diabetic nephropathy: discrepancy between glomerular expression and protein accumulation of decorin, biglycan, lumican, and fibromodulin. FASEB J. 2001;15(3):559–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186. Rienks M, Papageorgiou AP, Frangogiannis NG, Heymans S. Myocardial extracellular matrix: an ever-changing and diverse entity. Circ Res. 2014;114(5):872–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187. Christensen G, Herum KM, Lunde IG. Sweet, yet underappreciated: proteoglycans and extracellular matrix remodeling in heart disease. Matrix Biol. 2019;75–76:286–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188. Shami A, Gustafsson R, Kalamajski S, Krams R, Segers D, Rauch U, Roos G, Nilsson J, Oldberg Å, Hultgårdh-Nilsson A. Fibromodulin deficiency reduces low-density lipoprotein accumulation in atherosclerotic plaques in apolipoprotein E-null mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33(2):354–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189. Shami A, Tengryd C, Asciutto G, Bengtsson E, Nilsson J, Hultgårdh-Nilsson A, Gonçalves I. Expression of fibromodulin in carotid atherosclerotic plaques is associated with diabetes and cerebrovascular events. Atherosclerosis. 2015;241(2):701–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190. Cs-Szabo G, Roughley PJ, Plaas AH, Glant TT. Large and small proteoglycans of osteoarthritic and rheumatoid articular cartilage. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38(5):660–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry are provided here courtesy of The Histochemical Society

RESOURCES