Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Ultrasound logoLink to Journal of Medical Ultrasound
. 2020 Aug 15;28(3):195–196. doi: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_66_20

Reply to Comment on Sonographic Portal Vein Biometry among Apparently Healthy Children in Northeastern Nigeria

Geofery Luntsi 1,*, Kalu Ochie 2
PMCID: PMC7709526  PMID: 33282669

Dear Editor,

Dr. Mahmood Dhahir Al-Mendalawi is right about his assertion on our research work published in January–March 2020 issue of the Journal of Medical Ultrasound,[1] which was aimed at determining the mean portal vein diameter, based on age, gender, and anthropometric indices among a cohort of apparently healthy Nigerian children aged 0–18 years. Previous studies both locally and internationally using a similar method reported similar findings,[2,3,4,5,6] as shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Previous studies with the summary of their findings

Reference Country Population Findings
Luntsi et al.[1] Nigeria Children That portal vein diameter correlated positively with some anthropometric parameters among children in the studied population
Usman et al.[2] Nigeria Adults That portal vein diameter correlated with age and showed significant difference between the two sexes and respiratory phases
Adeyekun and Tsebi[3] Nigeria Adults That no significant correlation exists between portal vein diameter, age, gender, and body mass index
Luntsi et al.[4] Nigeria Adults That portal vein diameter positively correlates with age and anthropometric variables
Bhattacharya et al.[5] India Adults Established normal portal vein diameter which can be clinically useful among the studied population
Vocke et al.[6] Germany Children That portal vein diameter as well as its intrahepatic branches related well to anthropometric parameters in the studied population
Ghosh et al.[7] India Children That portal vein diameter in children strongly correlates with age and anthropometric variables such as height, weight, and chest circumference, with height being the strongest determinant, with no difference between both genders

We explicitly stated the few limitations we thought were necessary and in line with the scope of our study “that only the diameter of the portal vein was measured and not the portal vein flow velocity, that this was also a single-center study, and the findings were not specific as no other imaging modalities or laboratory investigations were used to confirm our findings.”[1]

We, however, agree with the author (s) that there are ethnic differences in terms of various organ sizes, thus the need for population-specific sonographic normative data of various organs to guide research and clinical practice.[8,9,10,11,12] However, racial[13,14] and even geographical[15,16] variations among others could as well be the confounding factor in the results. As such, this was not the focus of our study and such considerations were not put in place. We also believe that the author (s) will agree with us that no single study can answer all the questions that there is to answer. We appreciate the author (s) for their interest in our research work and hope that our little contribution will guide future research works.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Luntsi G, Umar RD, Ivor CN, Zira JD, Ahidjo A. Sonographic portal vein biometry in apparently healthy children in Northeastern Nigeria. J Med Ultrasound. 2020;28:24–8. doi: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_89_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Usman AU, Ibinaiye P, Ahidjo A, Tahir A, Sa'ad ST, Mustapha Z, et al. Ultrasound determination of portal vein diameter in adult patients with chronic liver disease in North Eastern Nigeria. Sub Saharan Afr J Med. 2015;2:57–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Adeyekun AA, Tsebi HB. Grey scale sonographic assessment of portal vein diameter in healthy Nigerian adults. J Med Biomed Res. 2014;13:17–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Luntsi G, Sani M, Zira JD, Ivor NC, Garba SH. Sonographic assessment of the portal vein diameter in apparently healthy adults in a Northern Nigerian population. Afr Health Sci. 2016;16:1163–8. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v16i4.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bhattacharya J, Aditi D, Anish B. Sonographic assessment of portal vein diameter in Northern part of West Bengal, India. Octa J Environ Res. 2013;1:2314. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vocke AK, Kardoff R, Ehrich JH. Sonographic measurement of the portal vein and its intrahepatic branches in children. Eur J Ultrasound. 1998;7:121–7. doi: 10.1016/s0929-8266(98)00016-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ghosh T, Banerjee M, Basu S, Das R, Kumar P, De S, et al. Assessment of normal portal vein diameter in children. Trop Gastroenterol. 2014;35:79–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sletner L, Nakstad B, Yajnik CS, Mørkrid K, Vangen S, Vårdal MH, et al. Ethnic differences in neonatal body composition in a multi ethnic population and the impact of parental factors: A population based cohort study? PLoS One. 8(8):e73058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Eze CU, Eze CU, Marchie TT, Ohagwu CC, Ochie K. Observer variability in sonographic measurement of kidney sizes among children in Benin-city, Nigeria. West Indian Med J. 2013;62:817–24. doi: 10.7727/wimj.2012.262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Warnakulasuriya DT, Peries PP, Rathnasekara YA, Jayawardena K, Upasena A, Wickremasinghe AR. Ultrasonographic parameters of the liver, spleen and kidneys among a cohort of school children in Sri Lanka. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17:192. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0943-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee S, Bountziouka V, Lum S, Stocks J, Bonner R, Naik M, et al. Ethnic variability in body size, proportions and composition in children aged 5 to 11 years: Is ethnic-specific calibration of bioelectrical impedance required? PLoS One. 2014;9:E113883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Su HA, Hsieh HY, Lee CT, Liao SC, Chu CH, Wu CH. Reference ranges for ultrasonographic renal dimensions as functions of age and body indices: A retrospective observational study in Taiwan. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0224785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rocha SMS, Ferrer APS, Oliveira IRS, Widman A, Chammas MC, Oliveira LAN, et al. Sonographic determination of liver size in healthy newborns, infants and children under 7 years of age. Radiol Bras. 2009;42:7–13. doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842009000100004. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Safak AA, Simsek E, Bahcebasi T. Sonographic assessment of the normal limits and percentile curves of liver, spleen, and kidney dimensions in healthy school-aged children. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:1359–64. doi: 10.7863/jum.2005.24.10.1359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Özmen Z, Aktaş F, Özmen ZC, Almus E, Demir O. Ultrasound measurement of liver longitudinal length in a North Anatolian population: A community-based study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018;21:653–7. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_68_17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Leary S, Fall C, Osmond C, Lovel H, Campbell D, Eriksson J, et al. Geographical variation in relationships between parental body size and offspring phenotype at birth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:1066–79. doi: 10.1080/00016340600697306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ultrasound are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES