Skip to main content
EPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to EPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: EM (Pittsburgh Pa). 2020 Nov 1;N/A:1–6.

Multiscale Modeling of Background Ozone: Research Needs to Inform and Improve Air Quality Management

C Hogrefe 1, B Henderson 2, G Tonnesen 3, R Mathur 1, R Matichuk 3
PMCID: PMC7709794  NIHMSID: NIHMS1645758  PMID: 33281437

Introduction

For many decades, ground-level ozone has been recognized as a pollutant that causes adverse human health effects and damages crops and ecosystems. Scientific understanding about the ambient concentrations at which such damages occur has evolved, triggering several revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone that gradually reduced critical thresholds. Grid-based photochemical air quality modeling systems (AQM) such as the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ)1 model and the Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx)2 have long been used to develop air quality management strategies aimed at reducing emissions of precursor species (nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds) for areas exceeding the ozone NAAQS. As the NAAQS became more stringent, processes considered in AQM were expanded from representing photochemistry causing elevated ozone levels in highly polluted urban airsheds such as the Los Angeles basin to also considering regional aspects such as the multi-state transport of ozone and its precursors and the effects of long-range international transport.

Viewed from an air quality management perspective, the magnitude of ozone formed from locally controllable anthropogenic precursor emissions relative to background ozone (BG O3) levels (i.e., ozone formed from non-local anthropogenic precursor emission sources and local and non-local natural sources, regardless of where the ozone formation occurs) has generally decreased over time. This increases emphasis on representing the processes controlling BG O3 and characterizing its temporal and spatial fluctuations, especially for ozone exceedance events. The latter is particularly important because although the relative magnitude of typical average BG O3 concentrations with respect to the NAAQS has increased, BG O3 contributions to specific exceedance events have not increased in some cases3,4.

Increased focus on BG O3 processes is evident in the broader research community5 and in EPA activities. For example, the EPA has summarized the state of BG O3 in policy assessments69, participated in broader community research syntheses4,10, and released guidance documents for BG O3 related events1112. Improving the representation of BG O3 in AQM improves their fidelity, which increases our confidence in the models’ ability to differentiate BG O3 from controllable sources. Improved differentiation promotes effective controls on anthropogenic sources. In this article, we provide our perspective on improving the characterization of BG O3 in AQM and discuss examples of using such information in air quality management.

Linking hemispheric-to-global and regional modeling in planning applications

AQM for current air quality planning are typically regional scale rather than global models. Therefore, species concentrations are prescribed along the lateral boundaries of the region that is modeled (“lateral boundary conditions” or LBC) and sometimes at the top of the model to reflect high ozone in the lower stratosphere. Historically, source attribution has differentiated BG O3 sources within regional scale models but did not consider source contributions to LBC. Increasingly, source attribution is also performed in multi-scale applications using zero-out techniques3,7,13,14, AQM equipped with enhanced source tracking or source attribution capabilities15,16, or by combinations of techniques17. Figure 1 illustrates how source-apportionment modeling performed on the hemispheric to global scale, e.g. with the hemispheric CMAQ (H-CMAQ)18 model, can provide additional information on the processes and source contributions to the “boundary condition” contribution estimated by a regional-scale CMAQ source-apportionment application.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Example ozone source apportionment analysis performed on both a U.S. regional CMAQ and a Northern Hemisphere H-CMAQ modeling domain. Note that the H-CMAQ source contributions are shown for a longer time period to illustrate their temporal fluctuations.

Hemispheric-to-global modeling research needs

Natural sources, international anthropogenic sources, and ozone of stratospheric origin are all significant contributors to concentrations along the boundaries of the regional-scale modeling domain (Figure 1). Future research should target improving the representation of these sources in hemispheric models like H-CMAQ or H-CAMx or global models that are often used to generate LBC for regional AQM19. Improvements to these models should include the following:

  • Better constraints for stratospheric ozone and stratosphere-troposphere air mass exchange. The hemispheric and global models differ in their characterization of stratospheric ozone, employing a variety of techniques, including parameterizations based on historical ozonesonde observations, using climatological satellite-derived concentrations fields, and simulating fully explicit stratospheric chemistry. Research is needed to systematically compare the strengths and shortcomings of the different approaches as they relate to air quality management applications. Stratosphere-troposphere air mass exchange occurs over a range of space and time scales, from individual short-lived stratospheric deep intrusion events that can be associated with strong fronts and may mix stratospheric air to the surface to slower mixing processes that control the large-scale ozone budget in the mid-to upper troposphere. Capturing the continuum of meteorological processes for the AQM requires representing dynamics in the tropopause with adequate vertical resolution and structure.

  • Improved representation of natural emissions. Natural sources contributing to the tropospheric ozone budget include biogenic emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC), emissions of nitrogen oxide (NO) from lightning, emissions of NO from soils, emissions of halogens from marine sources, and emissions of VOC and nitrogen oxides (NOx) from fires. Some sources, like soil NO, have both natural (via nitrogen fixation) and anthropogenic (via fertilization) contributions. Thus, it is important to understand the spatiotemporal distribution of each source, the space and time scales of influence, and how their relative contributions evolve over time. Quantifying the magnitude and temporal and spatial variations of these emission sources is uncertain due to incomplete knowledge about some of the underlying processes, as well as limitations in accurately representing these processes which often involve the interactions between the atmosphere, biosphere, and hydrosphere contributing to variability in these emissions in an AQM framework. Development work should be aimed at improved representations of these emissions within the AQM system while constraining emission estimates with remote sensing information where appropriate.

  • Improved characterization of international emissions. Detailed sector-specific emission inventories and approaches for processing such inventories into spatially, temporally, and chemically resolved fields for AQM have long been available over the U.S., Canada, and parts of Europe, but the same level of detail is generally unavailable elsewhere. International collaborations such as the Global Emissions Initiative (GEIA) or the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) provide opportunities to address such data gaps in the future and are particularly important to improve the characterization of emissions from countries such as Mexico and China that have been shown to impact modeled BG O3 over the U.S.9 Ocean-going ships burning fossil fuels also contribute a significant fraction of the global NOx and SO2 emissions. Changing trade patterns, growing shipping traffic, and changing fuel types and utilization will continue to alter the composition and amounts of shipping emissions embedded within air masses as they undergo long-range transport and impact downwind continents. Emerging satellite-observed vessel activity data sets may help to provide more accurate estimates of the evolving contribution to BG O3.

  • Enhanced characterization of BG O3 through data assimilation. The development needs listed above are aimed at improving the ability of the AQM to simulate tropospheric ozone through better process representations and input data. A parallel approach to improve the representation of tropospheric ozone that influences BG O3 in regional-scale AQM applications could leverage data assimilation in hemispheric or global scale models. Several assimilation studies have used satellite ozone and nitrogen dioxide to identify and update emissions estimates or add temporal trends2023. The Health and Air Quality Applied Science Team (HAQAST; haqast.org) included several assimilation projects designed to directly improve boundary conditions or to infer emission updates. Projects like these contribute data products that are useful to air quality managers and technology transfer between research institutions and the operational air quality agencies. Figure 2 provides a qualitative comparison of satellite products and a H-CMAQ model simulation. Differences between the satellite products and the model could potentially be leveraged with assimilation to update global emissions. Although data assimilation has the potential to improve the characterization of ozone inflow into regional domains for current and past conditions, it typically does not classify the sources contributing to this inflow. Further, data assimilation cannot project future changes in BG O3 that respond to changing emissions and climate.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Example comparison of satellite-derived (left column) and modeled (center column) NO2 (top row) and O3 (bottom row) column densities vertically integrated throughout the troposphere for summer 2016. Relative differences between the satellite-derived and modeled values are shown in the right column. Note that in this example comparison, model values were limited to hours near the satellite overpass time, clear sky conditions, and did not have the satellite averaging kernel applied.

Regional-scale modeling needs

The previous section listed key development needs to improve the representation of BG O3 derived from hemispheric-to-global scale models and specified as boundary conditions for regional-scale AQM. In this section, we discuss several areas of research that would help ensure that regional-scale AQM adequately quantify the contributions of BG O3 to surface ozone.

  • Representing vertical mixing between the free troposphere and boundary layer. Previous work19, 24, 25 showed that the sensitivity of surface O3 concentrations towards LBC is generally most pronounced for those LBC that originate in the mid-troposphere. This implies that representing vertical mixing, including mixing by clouds, in AQM is key to capturing the effects of BG O3 on surface ozone. Accurate simulation of vertical mixing is especially important in the intermountain west, including ozone non-attainment areas in Colorado and Utah, where high elevation and complex terrain result in deep convective boundary layers and where BG O3 is a larger contributor compared to lower elevation states10. Liu et al.26 performed a model intercomparison study and confirmed that differences in vertical grid structure and model representation of vertical mixing were the main reason for differences in boundary condition tracer concentrations at the surface.

  • Improved representation of natural emissions. Similar to the hemispheric-to-global scale, an improved process-based representation of natural emissions on the regional scale would increase confidence in estimating BG O3 contributions to ground-level ozone. Over the U.S., emphasis should be placed on representing biogenic VOCs, lighting and soil NO, and fire emissions at finer temporal and spatial scales. Such improvements would improve quantifying the contributions to ozone from these sources in different areas (rural vs. urban) and on different days.

  • Improved estimates of U.S. anthropogenic emissions. Accurate domestic emissions inventories for VOC and NOx are essential for AQM to simulate local ozone production, the relative effectiveness of VOC and NOx controls, and the relative importance of domestic versus background sources of ozone. VOC and NOx emissions from oil and gas production activities are highly uncertain and may be underestimated by at least a factor of two2730. McDonald et al.31 found that consumer product VOC emissions are substantially underestimated causing AQM to underestimate local ozone production. Karamchandani et al.32found that ozone trends over Los Angeles were more accurately modeled when the reported domestic VOC emissions were doubled. In contrast, Travis et al.33 cite several studies suggesting that anthropogenic NOx emissions from several sectors were significantly overestimated and found that AQM performance for ozone in the southeastern U.S. improved when attempting to correct for this overestimation.

  • Chemistry improvements. Photochemical mechanisms reflect the state of the science on chemical interactions, but there is considerable uncertainty in understanding the formation of organic nitrates in the oxidation of isoprene and terpene34, in the nighttime production of organic nitrates35, in radical budgets and nighttime radical reservoirs36, and in aromatic oxidation chemistry37,38. Given the continuing reductions in the mobile and industrial sources of NOx emissions and the transition of many urban areas from VOC sensitive to NOx sensitive photochemical regimes, the accurate simulation of VOC yields from the photochemical formation of organic and peroxy acyl nitrates sources becomes increasingly important. Research currently being conducted under EPA Science to Achieve Results (STAR) grants is expected to address some of these uncertainties and thereby advance the state of science.

  • Diagnostic model performance evaluation. EPA guidance for modeling to demonstrate ozone model attainment demonstrations recommends using AQM in a relative sense39. Accordingly, the model’s response to emission controls is quantified through relative response factors (RRF) that are multiplied by the observed baseline ozone design value to project whether the NAAQS will be attained. Using AQM in a relative sense is generally thought to be more reliable than using it in an absolute sense40. However, even a relative use of model results can be problematic when AQM do not accurately simulate source contributions to ozone due to errors in the upstream meteorological model, errors in simulating regional transport and BG O3, and/or errors in modeled emissions inventories and local production of ozone. For example, AQM that overestimate regional BG O3 and underestimate local ozone production will provide inaccurate estimates of the relative ozone response to local emissions control measures. Research is needed in the use of diagnostic model evaluation techniques to evaluate the accuracy of modeled source contributions to ozone and to consider alternative ways to apply RRF at locations with high background ozone.

  • Measurement needs to support regional model improvements. Advances in development of low-cost, compact, and accurate sensors should be leveraged to explore continuous aloft measurements of air pollution in the nocturnal residual layer by deploying such sensors on tall structures such as telecommunication towers. This would provide measurements relevant to quantifying the non-local contribution to surface-level air pollution41. Further, improved observational networks and additional field studies that collect continuous and co-located measurements (i.e., surface and vertical profiles) of speciated VOCs, NOx, and other key species relevant to O3 would support more comprehensive model performance evaluations and aid in understanding the baseline of ozone and BG O310.

Conclusion:

Accurately quantifying BG O3 is important for many air quality management applications. In this article, we have provided our perspective on research needs at both the regional and global scale to improve model-based estimates of BG O3. We hope this perspective can serve as road map as federal, state, and local agencies as well as academic partners develop research plans to address this challenge.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the view or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

References:

  • 1.EPA: CMAQ [Software]. Available from 10.5281/zenodo.3585898, 2019a. [DOI]
  • 2.Ramboll: CAMx [Software]. Available from http://www.camx.com, 2020
  • 3.Dolwick P, Akhtar F, Baker KR, Possiel N, Simon H and Tonnesen G: Comparison of background ozone estimates over the western United States based on two separate model methodologies. Atmos Environ 109: 282–296. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.005, 2015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.EPA: Implementation of the 2015 Primary Ozone NAAQS: Issues Associated with Background Ozone White Paper for Discussion. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.National Research Council (NRC): Global sources of local pollution: An assessment of long-range transport of key air pollutants to and from the United States. Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, Committee on the Significance of International Transport of Air Pollutants. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.EPA: Integrated Science Assessment for Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants (EPA 600/R-10/076F). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.EPA: Policy Assessment for the Review of the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (EPA-452/R-14–006). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.EPA: Integrated Science Assessment for Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants (EPA-600/R-20–012). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.EPA: Policy Assessment for the Review of the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (EPA-452/R-20–001). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jaffe DA, Cooper OR, Fiore AM, Henderson BH, Tonnesen GS, Russell AG, Henze DK, Langford AO, Lin M and Moore T: Scientific assessment of background ozone over the U.S.: Implications for air quality management. Elem Sci Anth, 6(1), p.56., 10.1525/elementa.309, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.EPA: Treatment of Air Quality Data Influenced by Exceptional Events. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. https://www.epa.gov/air-quality-analysis/treatment-air-quality-data-influenced-exceptional-events-homepage-exceptional, visited 2020-06-15, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.EPA: DRAFT Guidance on the Preparation of Clean Air Act Section 179B Demonstrations for Nonattainment Areas Affected by International Transport of Emissions (EPA-457/P-20–001). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang L, Jacob DJ, Downey NV, Wood DA, Blewitt D, Carouge CC, van Donkelaar A, Jones DBA, Murray LT, Wang Y: Improved estimate of the policy-relevant background ozone in the United States using the GEOS-Chem global model with 1/2° × 2/3° horizontal resolution over North America. Atmospheric Environment 45, 6769–6776. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.054, 2011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Emery C, Jung J, Downey N, Johnson J, Jimenez M, Yarwood G, Morris R: Regional and global modeling estimates of policy relevant background ozone over the United States. Atmospheric Environment 47, 206–217. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.012, 2012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lapina K, Henze DK, Milford JB, Huang M, Lin M, Fiore AM, Carmichael G, Pfister GG, and Bowman K: Assessment of source contributions to seasonal vegetative exposure to ozone in the U.S., J. Geophys. Res. Atmos, 119, 324–340, 10.1002/2013JD020905, 2014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dunker AM, Koo B, Yarwood G: Contributions of foreign, domestic and natural emissions to US ozone estimated using the path-integral method in CAMx nested within GEOS-Chem. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 17, 12553–12571. 10.5194/acp-17-12553-2017, 2017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.EPA: Technical Support Document for EPA’s Updated 2028 Regional Haze Modeling. United States Environmental Protection Agency, RTP, NC, 2019b. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mathur R, Xing J, Gilliam R, Sarwar G, Hogrefe C, Pleim, Pouliot G, Roselle S, Spero TL, Wong D, Young J: Extending the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system to hemispheric scales: overview of process considerations and initial applications, Atmos. 17, 12449–12474, 10.5194/acp-17-12449-2017, 2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hogrefe C, Liu P, Pouliot G, Mathur R, Roselle S, Flemming J, Lin M, and Park RJ: Impacts of different characterizations of large-scale background on simulated regional-scale ozone over the continental United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 18, 3839–3864, 10.5194/acp-18-3839-2018, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lamsal LN, Martin RV, Padmanabhan A, van Donkelaar A, Zhang Q, Sioris CE, Chance K, Kurosu TP, Newchurch MJ: Application of satellite observations for timely updates to global anthropogenic NOx emission inventories. Geophysical Research Letters 38, 10.1029/2010GL046476, 2011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Duncan BN, Lamsal LN, Thompson AM, Yoshida Y, Lu Z, Streets DG, Hurwitz MM, Pickering KE: A space-based, high-resolution view of notable changes in urban NO x pollution around the world (2005–2014): Notable Changes in Urban NOx Pollution. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 10.1002/2015JD024121, 2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu F, Choi S, Li C, Fioletov VE, McLinden CA, Joiner J, Krotkov NA, Bian H, Janssens-Maenhout G, Darmenov AS, da Silva AM: A new global anthropogenic SO2 emission inventory for the last decade: a mosaic of satellite-derived and bottom-up emissions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 18, 16571–16586. 10.5194/acp-18-16571-2018, 2018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Qu Z, Henze DK, Theys N, Wang J, Wang W: Hybrid Mass Balance/4D‐Var Joint Inversion of NOx and SO2 Emissions in East Asia. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 124, 8203–8224. 10.1029/2018JD030240, 2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schere KL et al. : Trace gas/aerosol boundary concentrations and their impacts on continental-scale AQMEII modeling domains, Atmos. Environ, 53, 38–50, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.043, 2012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Baker KR, Emery C, Dolwick P and Yarwood G: Photochemical grid model estimates of lateral boundary contributions to ozone and particulate matter across the continental United States, Atmospheric Environment, 123, 2015, 49–62, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.055, 2015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liu P, Hogrefe C, Im U, Christensen JH, Bieser J, Nopmongcol U, Yarwood G, Mathur R, Roselle S, and Spero T: Attributing differences in the fate of lateral boundary ozone in AQMEII3 models to physical process representations, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 18, 17157–17175, 10.5194/acp-18-17157-2018, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pétron G, Karion A, Sweeney C, Miller BR, Montzka SA, Frost GJ, Trainer M, Tans P, Andrews A, Kofler J, Helmig D, Guenther D, Dlugokencky E, Lang P, Newberger T, Wolter S, Hall B, Novelli P, Brewer A, Conley S, Hardesty M, Banta R, White A, Noone D, Wolfe D, & Schnell R (2014). A new look at methane and nonmethane hydro‐carbon emissions from oil and natural gas operations in the Colorado Denver‐Julesburg Basin. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 119, 6836–6852, 10.1002/2013JD021272, 2014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ahmadov R, McKeen S, Trainer M, Banta R, Brewer A, Brown S, Edwards PM, de Gouw JA, Frost GJ, Gilman J, Helmig D, Johnson B, Karion A, Koss A, Langford A, Lerner B, Olson J, Oltmans S, Peischl J, Pétron G, Pichugina Y, Roberts JM, Ryerson T, Schnell R, Senff C, Sweeney C, Thompson C, Veres PR, Warneke C, Wild R, Williams EJ, Yuan B, and Zamora R: Understanding high wintertime ozone pollution events in an oil- and natural gas-producing region of the western US, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 15, 411–429, 10.5194/acp-15-411-2015, 2015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Flocke F, Pfister G,Crawford JH, Pickering KE, Pierce G, Bon D,&Reddy, P.: Air quality in the northern colorado front range metro area: The front range air pollution and photochemistry Éxperiment (FRAPPÉ). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 125, e2019JD031197. 10.1029/2019JD031197, 2020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Matichuk R, Tonnesen G, Luecken D, Gilliam R, Napelenok S, Baker K, Schwede D, Murphy B, Helmig D, Lyman S, and Roselle S. Evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model for Simulating Winter Ozone Formation in the Uinta Basin. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos, 122(24): 13545–13572, 10.1002/2017JD027057, 2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McDonald et al. , Volatile chemical products emerging as largest petrochemical source of urban organic emissions, Science 359(6377):760–764, 10.1126/science.aaq0524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Karamchandani P; Morris R; Wentland A; Shah T; Reid S; Lester J Dynamic Evaluation of Photochemical Grid Model Response to Emission Changes in the South Coast Air Basin in California. Atmosphere 8, 145, 10.3390/atmos8080145, 2017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Travis KR, Jacob DJ, Fisher JA, Kim PS, Marais EA, Zhu L, Yu K, Miller CC, Yantosca RM, Sulprizio MP, Thompson AM, Wennberg PO, Crounse JD, St. Clair JM, Cohen RC, Laughner JL, Dibb JE, Hall SR, Ullmann K, Wolfe GM, Pollack IB, Peischl J, Neuman JA, and Zhou X: Why do models overestimate surface ozone in the Southeast United States?, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 16, 13561–13577, 10.5194/acp-16-13561-2016, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schwantes RH, Emmons LK, Orlando JJ, Barth MC, Tyndall GS, Hall SR, Ullmann K, St. Clair JM, Blake DR, Wisthaler A, and Bui TPV: Comprehensive isoprene and terpene gas-phase chemistry improves simulated surface ozone in the southeastern US, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 20, 3739–3776, 10.5194/acp-20-3739-2020, 2020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kenagy HS, Sparks TL, Wooldridge PJ, Weinheimer AJ, Ryerson TB, Blake DR, Hornbrook RS, Apel EC, Cohen RC: Evidence of nighttime production of organic nitrates during SEAC4RS, FRAPPÉ, and KORUS-AQ. Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2020GL087860. 10.1029/2020GL087860, 2020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Young CJ, Washenfelder RA, Roberts JM, Mielke LH, Osthoff HD, Tsai C, Pikelnaya O, Stutz J, Veres PR, Cochran AK, VandenBoer TC, Flynn J, Grossberg N, Haman CL, Lefer B, Stark H, Graus M, de Gouw J, Gilman JB, Kuster WC, and Brown SS Environmental Science & Technology, 46 (20), 10965–10973, 10.1021/es302206a, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Derwent RG, Representing Organic Compound Oxidation in Chemical Mechanisms for Policy-Relevant Air Quality Models under Background Troposphere Conditions Atmosphere 2020, 11, 171; 10.3390/atmos11020171, 2020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Luecken D; Yarwood G; Hutzell W Multipollutant modeling of ozone, reactive nitrogen and HAPs across the continental US with CMAQ-CB6. Atmos. Environ 201, 62–72, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.11.060, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.EPA: Modeling Guidance for Demonstrating Air Quality Goals for Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze (EPA 454/R-18–009). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Foley KM, Dolwick P, Hogrefe C, Simon H, Timin B, Possiel N: Dynamic evaluation of CMAQ part II: Evaluation of relative response factor metrics for ozone attainment demonstrations, Atmospheric Environment, 103, 188–195, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.039, 2015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mathur R, Hogrefe C, Hakami A, Zhao S, Szykman J, Hagler G: A Call for an Aloft Air Quality Monitoring Network: Need, Feasibility, and Potential Value, Environmental Science & Technology 2018 52 (19), 10903–10908, 10.1021/acs.est.8b02496, 2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES