Abstract
Trichoderma spp. are known as biocontrol agents of fungal plant pathogens and have been recognized as a potential source of bioactive metabolites. The production of antimicrobial substances from strains T. atroviride (TS) and T. asperellum (IMI 393899) was investigated. The bioactivity of 10- and 30-day culture filtrate extracted with ethyl acetate was assessed against a set of pathogenic fungi and oomycetes. The 30-day extracts of both strains had significant cytotoxic effects against the tested pathogens, with values of minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) ranging between 0.19 and 6.25 mg/mL. Dual culture assay (direct contact and nondirect contact) and the percentage inhibition of radial growth (PIRG) was calculated. The highest PIRG values were 76% and 81% (direct contact) with IMI 393899 and TS, respectively. Nondirect contact does not show inhibition on any of pathogens tested, indicating that the inhibition is not due to the secretion of volatile substances. Culture filtrates were analyzed by GC-MS and HPLC-Q-TOF-MS for the identification of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nonvolatile organic compounds (nVOCs), respectively. Seven classes of VOCs and 12 molecules of nVOCs were identified. These results indicate that these strains of Trichoderma had antimicrobial activities and they are potential natural sources of compounds with biological activity.
Keywords: Trichoderma asperellum, Trichoderma atroviride, bioactive metabolites, biological control, plant pathogens
1. Introduction
Synthetic chemicals, such as fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides, used in horticultural production systems and during postharvest processes are environmental pollutants and potentially harmful to humans and animals [1]. The excessive use of broad-spectrum synthetic fungicides can affect the microbiome of the rhizosphere, including symbiotic fungi and beneficial bacteria. These microorganisms interact with the plants, modifying and promoting the availability of nutrients in the soil, such as nitrogen fixation [2]. In addition, numerous studies have shown that there is the risk of selection of resistant strains of pathogens to synthetic fungicides [3]. The excessive use of synthetic chemicals in farming systems has led governmental and international institutions to limit their use and shift interest towards sustainable food and agriculture (FAO, 2020). A valid alternative to synthetic fungicides is the use of biocontrol agents and/or their metabolites. Currently, several biocontrol agents are recognized including bacterial, such as Agrobacterium, Bacillus, and Pseudomonas, and fungal, such as Ampelomyces, Aspergillus, Candida, Coniothyrium, Gliocadium, Pseudozyma, Streptomyces, and Trichoderma, agents [4]. In particular, the Trichoderma genus have ability to adapt and thrive in different environmental conditions. This genus proved effective in the sustainable management of crop diseases caused by fungi. Trichoderma spp. are among the most frequently isolated soil inhabiting fungi and are common in the plant rhizosphere. These fungi are opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts, and act as parasites and antagonists of many phytopathogenic fungi, thus protecting plants from disease [5]. The antagonistic properties of Trichoderma spp. are based on the activation of indirect and direct mechanisms. The indirect mechanisms are competition for space and nutrients, promotion of growth, and induction of plant defenses, whereas the direct mechanisms are mycoparasitism and production of active metabolites and lytic enzymes. These indirect and direct mechanisms can act synergistically and depending on species and strain [6]. An interesting feature of Trichoderma spp. is the production of volatile and nonvolatile secondary metabolites capable of inhibiting the growth of pathogens. However, little is known about their production which can vary from strain to strain. Based on their structure, known metabolites with antibiotic activity can be classified into two main types: (i.) low-molecular-weight and volatile metabolites and (ii.) high-molecular-weight and polar metabolites. Low molecular weight and volatile metabolites include simple aromatic compounds, volatile terpenes, and isocyanide, and relatively nonpolar substances with significant vapor pressure [7]. These ‘‘volatile organic compounds’’ in the soil environment would be expected to diffuse over a distance through systems thus enhancing the performance of the organism by affecting the physiology of competitor organisms [7,8]. High-molecular-weight and polar metabolites, like peptaibols, may exert their activity through direct interactions between Trichoderma species and their antagonists [7]. In this study, we tested the antagonistic ability and the production of secondary metabolites with inhibitory activity of strains of Trichoderma asperellum and Trichoderma atroviride on different pathogens of the genera Fusarium, Aspergillus, Penicillium, Colletotrichum, Neofusicoccum, and Phytophthora, that cause loss to agricultural crops.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemical Materials
HPLC-grade methanol and acetonitrile and analytical reagent grade ethyl acetate, formic acid (99%), and dimethyl sulfoxide (99.9% DMSO) were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Loughborough, UK). Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) was obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Kandel, Germany). Potato dextrose agar (PDA) and Potato dextrose broth (PDB) was obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Basingstoke, UK). Ultrapure water (<18 MΩ/cm) was obtained from a Milli-Q purification system (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA, USA).
2.2. Fungal Strains, Culture Conditions, and Spore Production
Six Penicillium strains (P. digitatum CECT 2954, P. commune CECT 20767, P. expansum CECT 2278, P. roqueforti CECT 2905, P. camemberti CECT 2267, P. brevicopactum CECT 2316) and four Aspergillus strains (A. parasiticus CECT 2681, A. niger CECT 2088, A. steynii CECT 20510, A. lacticoffeatus CECT 20581) were sourced from the Spanish Type Culture Collection (Valencia, Spain).
Six Fusarium strains (F. proliferatum ITEM 12072, F. verticillioides ITEM 12052, F. sporotrichoides ITEM 12168, F. langsethiae ITEM 11031, F. poae ITEM 9151, F. graminearum ITEM 126) and two Aspergillus strains (A. flavus ITEM 8111, A. carbonarius ITEM 5010) were obtained from the Agro-Food Microbial Culture Collection (Bari, Italy).
Penicillium verrucosum VTT D-01847 was obtained from the VTT Culture Collection (Finland). Two Neofusicoccum species (N. batangarum, N. parvum), two Colletotrichum species (C. acutatum, C. gloeosporioides), two species of the oomycete Phytophthora (Ph. parvispora, Ph. nicotianae) and two species of Trichoderma (T. asperellum IMI 393899, T. atroviride TS) were obtained from the collection of the Molecular Plant Pathology Laboratory of the Di3A, University of Catania (Catania, Italy).
The mycotoxigenic fungi were cryopreserved in sterile 30% glycerol at –80 °C, but before antifungal studies they were defrosted and cultured in PDB at 25 °C for 48 h and inoculated on PDA plates to obtain spores.
All other fungal strains were maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA) at room temperature and subcultures were made every 20 days.
The strains of Neofusicoccum and Colletotrichum were grown on oatmeal agar (OMA) to increase the production of conidia [9].
Phytophthora nicotianae and Ph. parvispora were grown on OMA for the production of sporangia. From 10-day-old cultures, a zoospore suspension was obtained by flooding each culture plate with 10 mL sterile distilled water. The plates with the sterile distilled water were then refrigerated (5 °C) for 25 min and incubated in the dark at 25 °C for 30 min to induce zoospore release [10].
The OMA was prepared with the protocol [11] slightly modified. In particular, 60 g of rolled oats were added to 600 mL of water and then heated for 40 min. The suspension was sieved and 12 g of agar was added, subsequently reaching the final volume of 1 L and autoclaved for 20 min at 121 °C. The OMA medium for Phytophthora was prepared as previously described, but with 75 g of rolled oats and 20 g of agar [11].
2.3. Isolation and Identification of Trichoderma Strains
The strain of Trichoderma asperellum, IMI 393899 [12,13], had previously been identified morphologically as Trichoderma harzianum. However, recent DNA analysis has identified it as T. asperellum. Trichoderma atroviride, TS strain, was isolated from the basidiocarp of Ganoderma lucidum a wood parasite. The tissue fragments of the basidiocarp (5 mm), taken between the healthy tissue and the infected tissue, were washed with 1% NaClO for 2 min, rinsed with sterile distilled water and transferred onto plates with potato dextrose agar (PDA) with the addition of streptomycin sulfate (0.25 g/L). The plates were incubated at 25 °C for 24 h. Pure subcultures were obtained from growing colonies on PDA.
For the identification of Trichoderma spp. the growing mycelium on PDA plates was taken and DNA was extracted and purified using the DNA PowerPlant® Pro Kit (Qiagen, Milan, Italy). The identification of Trichoderma isolates was carried out by amplification and analysis of the regions of the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal DNA (rDNA). The amplification was made using Taq DNA polymerase, recombinant (Invitrogen™, Milan, Italy) with the universal primer pairs ITS-5 (5′-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3′) and ITS-4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) [14].
The reaction mixture for PCR amplification was PCR buffer (1X), dNTP mixture (0.2 mM), MgCl2 (1.5 mM), forward and reverse primers (0.5 mM), Taq DNA Polymerase (1 U), and 100 ng of DNA.
The conditions of the thermocycler were: 94 °C for 3 min; followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s, and finally, 72 °C for 10 min. The amplicons obtained were confirmed in 1% agarose gel and sequenced in both directions by an external service (Macrogen, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). Obtained sequences were analyzed using FinchTV v.1.4.0 [15]. For species identification, blast searches in GenBank [16] were performed.
2.4. Liquid Culture and Metabolite Production
Two plugs of each Trichoderma strains, obtained from actively growing margins of PDA cultures, were used to inoculate 750 mL flasks containing 500 mL of sterile potato dextrose broth (PDB). The liquid cultures were incubated for 10 and 30 days at 30 °C under stirring (100 rpm). The cultures were filtered under vacuum through filter paper, and the filtrates were stored at 2 °C for 24 h before the biphasic extraction. Then 10- and 30-day culture filtrates (100 mL) and the relative PDB (controls) were stored at −80 °C and, subsequently, freeze-dried for the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
2.5. Extraction of Metabolites from Liquid Culture
The 10- and 30- day culture filtrates of T. asperellum IMI 393899 and T. atroviride TS were extracted with ethyl acetate (EtOAc) for 3 times with a final 1:1 ratio.
The combined organic fraction was dried (MgSO4) and evaporated under reduced pressure at 35 °C. The red-brown residues recovered were dissolved with 10% DMSO or MeOH and stored at -20 °C until the subsequent analysis was done.
2.6. Agar Diffusion Test
The activity of EtOAc extracts of 10 and 30 days of the two Trichoderma strains was tested against different pathogens with the agar diffusion test. The spore suspension of pathogen was stratified on the surface of PDA plate using sterile cotton swabs and 10 µL of extract at different concentrations (0, 1, 10, 25, 50, and 100 mg/mL) were distributed on the surface. The plates were incubated at 25 °C. The control 10% DMSO was used in the test. After 72 h of incubation, the diameter of the inhibition halos was measured. Phytophthora species are oomycetes, which form zoospores as infectious propagules and have a different behavior from spores. For this reason, the assay for two species of Phytophthora was performed in a different way. A plug (5 mm) of mycelium from an active growing culture was placed in the center of the PDA plate, and 10 µL of extract was placed at a distance of 25 mm using the concentrations previously reported. The plates were incubated at 25 °C for 3 days. The inhibition of the growth was assessed by measuring the diameter of the inhibition halos in comparison with the control (10% DMSO).
2.7. Antimicrobic Dilution Assay
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), defined as the lowest concentration of the treatment that inhibits the visible fungal growth, was determined with a microdilution method. A 100 μL aliquot of 30-day EtOAc extract (stock solution: 50 mg/mL), diluted with sterile PDB to obtain final concentrations of 0.09–25 mg/mL, was added to 96-well sterile microplates. Then, the wells were inoculated with 100 μL of a 5 × 104 spores (or zoospores)/mL suspension and incubated at 25 °C for 72 h. The suspension of the pathogen strains was prepared by suspending the spores or zoospores in buffered peptone water with 1% Tween 20. Spore or zoospores were counted using the Neubauer chamber and the suspension was adjusted to the final concentration [17]. Wells with either PDB and the spores (or zoospores) of the pathogens or PDB and 10% DMSO were used as controls.
After determining the MIC, aliquots of the wells with concentrations corresponding to the MIC as well as with higher concentrations were used to inoculate PDA plates for the determination of the minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC). After incubation of the plates at 25 °C for 72 h, the MFC, defined as the lowest treatment concentration required to kill a pathogen and corresponding to a nonvisible growth of the subculture, was determined. Three replicates of each assay were assessed.
2.8. Dual Culture Assay
The competition ability for direct contact and production of nonvolatile or volatile substances by Trichoderma strains were evaluated with two methods of dual culture assay.
In both methods, a 5 mm plug, taken from 5 to 7 days cultures on PDA of the pathogen as well as of the antagonist, was placed on the opposite side of a PDA plate; however, in the second method, the plate was separated into two compartments. The first method evaluates the inhibition growth for direct contact and production of nonvolatile substances, whereas the second method determines the possibility of inhibition due to volatile substances, because they are not in direct contact.
All plates were incubated at 25 °C and radial growth of pathogens was measured daily. The controls were plates with only the pathogen and three repetitions were made per thesis.
The percentage inhibitory of radial growth (PIRG) was calculated using the following formula:
where PIRG is percent of growth inhibition;
Dc is growth rate of the pathogen (control);
Dt is growth rate of the pathogen in presence of Trichoderma.
2.9. Analysis of VOCs
Lyophilized culture filtrate (200 mg) was mixed with 2 mL of water and placed in a 10 mL glass vial. VOCs were identified by gas chromatography with a single quadrupole mass spectrometer detector (GC/MS) analysis. Prior to analysis, samples were incubated in a water bath at 55 °C for 45 min, while being gently stirred with a rod. VOCs were extracted from the vial headspace by solid-phase microextraction (SPME). An SPME holder (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) containing a fused-silica fiber coated with a 50/30 μm layer of divinylbenzene/Carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/CAR/PDMS) was used to trap VOCs in the vial headspace. The fiber was introduced into the splitless inlet of an Agilent 6890N GC system (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and thermal desorption of the analytes was performed at 250 °C for 5 min. The GC system was equipped with an HP-5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm and 0.25 μm 5% diphenyl/95% dimethylpolysiloxane) capillary column (J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA). The oven was programmed to start at 40 °C (held for 2 min) and to ramp up to 160 °C at 6 °C/min, and then, it was increased to 260 °C at 10 °C/min (held for 4 min). Helium (99.999%) was used as the carrier gas, and the flow rate was 1 mL/min. The flow was transferred from the column into an Agilent 5973 MS detector (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto). The ion source temperature was set at 230 °C, the ionizing electron energy was 70 eV, and the mass range was 40–450 Da in full scan acquisition mode. Compounds were identified using the NIST Atomic Spectra Database version 1.6 (Gaithersburg, MD, USA), considering spectra with 95% similarity. Results were expressed as a percentage of the VOC by dividing the area of each peak by the total area of the chromatogram peaks [18]. The analysis was carried out in triplicate.
2.10. Analysis of nVOCs
For the identification of nonvolatile organic compounds (nVOCs), 50 mg of the crude extracts were resuspended with 2 mL of methanol. All samples were filtered through 0.22 μm nylon membrane prior to injection. The HPLC system used for the chromatographic determination was an Agilent 1200 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a vacuum degasser, autosampler, and binary pump. The column was a Gemini C18 (50 mm × 2 mm, 100 Å, and 3 μm particle size; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA).
The binary mobile phases consisted of water (A) and acetonitrile (B) with 0.1% v/v formic acid. The initial gradient of the mobile phase was 5% B for 5 min and was increased to 95% B over 10 min. It was maintained at 95% B for 20 min, reduced to 5% B for 5 min, and then maintained for 5 min. The flow rate was maintained at 0.3 mL/min and 20 μL of each sample was injected.
Mass spectrometry (MS) analysis was performed using a Q-TOF-MS (6540 Agilent Ultra High Definition Accurate Mass, Santa Clara, CA, USA), equipped with an Agilent Dual Jet Stream electrospray ionization (Dual AJS ESI, Santa Clara, CA, USA) interface in positive and negative ion mode over the range of m/z 50–1500. The parameters were as follows: drying gas flow (N2), 8.0 L/min; nebulizer pressure, 30 psig; gas drying temperature, 350 °C; capillary voltage, 3.5 kV; and fragmentor voltage, 175 V. Targeted MS/MS experiments were carried out using collision energy values of 10, 20, and 40 eV. Integration and data elaboration were managed using MassHunter Qualitative Analysis software B.08.00 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) [19]. The analysis was carried out in triplicate.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Antifungal Activity on Solid Medium, MIC, and MFC
The results of the antifungal activity of nonvolatile or diffusible compounds obtained with the two Trichoderma strains tested, T. asperellum IMI 393899 and T. atroviride TS, showed that the extracted antifungal compounds inhibited the growth of all pathogens in the agar diffusion assay, as shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Strains | * EtOAc Extracts of | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T. asperellum | T. atroviride | |||||||||||
Concentrations mg/mL | 0 | 1 | 10 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 25 | 50 | 100 |
Penicillium digitatum | - | - | + | ++ | +++ | +++ | - | - | + | ++ | ++ | ++ |
Penicillium commune | - | - | + | +++ | +++ | +++ | - | - | + | + | ++ | ++ |
Penicillium expansum | - | + | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | - | - | + | ++ | ++ | ++ |
Penicillium roqueforti | - | - | + | ++ | ++ | ++++ | - | - | + | + | + | ++ |
Penicillium camemberti | - | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++++ | +++++ | - | - | + | + | ++ | ++ |
Penicillium brevicopactum | - | - | + | ++ | +++ | ++++ | - | - | + | + | + | ++ |
Penicillium verrucosum | - | - | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | - | - | + | + | + | ++ |
Aspergillus parasiticus | - | - | + | + | +++ | ++++ | - | - | - | - | + | ++ |
Aspergillus flavus | - | - | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++++ | - | - | + | + | ++ | ++ |
Aspergillus niger | - | + | + | ++++ | ++++ | +++++ | - | - | + | + | ++ | ++ |
Aspergillus steynii | - | ++ | +++ | +++++ | +++++ | +++++ | - | - | + | ++ | ++ | ++ |
Aspergillus carbonarius | - | + | + | +++ | +++++ | ++++ | - | - | + | + | + | ++ |
Aspergillus lacticoffeatus | - | - | ++ | +++ | ++++ | +++++ | - | - | + | + | ++ | ++ |
Fusarium proliferatum | - | - | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | - | - | + | + | ++ | ++ |
Fusarium verticillioides | - | - | + | ++ | +++ | ++++ | - | - | - | + | ++ | ++ |
Fusarium sporotrichoides | - | - | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++++ | - | - | + | + | + | ++ |
Fusarium langsethiae | - | - | + | + | ++ | +++ | - | - | - | + | ++ | ++ |
Fusarium poae | - | - | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | - | - | + | + | ++ | ++ |
Fusarium graminearum | - | - | + | ++ | +++ | ++++ | - | - | - | + | ++ | ++ |
Neofusicoccum batangarum | - | - | + | +++ | +++++ | +++++ | - | - | + | +++ | ++++ | +++++ |
Neofusicoccum parvum | - | - | + | +++ | +++++ | +++++ | - | - | + | +++ | ++++ | +++++ |
Colletotrichum acutatum | - | - | + | ++ | +++ | +++ | - | - | + | + | ++ | +++ |
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides | - | - | + | + | +++ | +++++ | - | - | - | + | ++ | +++ |
Phytophthora parvispora | - | - | ++ | +++ | ++++ | +++++ | - | - | + | ++ | ++ | ++++ |
Phytophthora nicotianae | - | - | ++ | +++ | ++++ | +++++ | - | - | ++ | ++++ | +++ | +++++ |
The agar diffusion test of the extract of the 10 days culture filtrate at maximum concentrations incited a change in the colony morphology of the pathogen, but not a significant reduction in growth. For this reason, all subsequent inhibition tests were carried out using 30-day extracts. Both 30-day EtOAc extracts were effective on all tested pathogens, showing inhibition halos that varied with the concentration of the extract.
In particular, the extract of T. asperellum showed an inhibition halo at a concentration of 1 mg/mL on P. expansum, P. camemberti, A. niger, A. steynii, and A. carbonarius, with an average halo of 8 mm. The inhibition was visible on all pathogens at a concentration of 10 mg/mL with an average halo of 9.7 mm. At this concentration, the most susceptible was A. steynii with an area of inhibition of 17 mm and the least susceptible was C. gloesporioides with an area of inhibition of 5 mm. At the maximum concentration of 100 mg/mL extract, the average inhibition values were 24 mm and exceeded 30 mm for of P. camemberti, A. niger, A. steynii, Neofusicoccum spp., Ph. Parvispora, and Ph. nicotianae. At this concentration, the lowest value was 18 mm of inhibition area for P. verrucosum and F. poae.
The extract of T. atroviride was effective at the minimum concentration of 10 mg/mL on all pathogens with the exception of A. parasiticus, F. verticillioides, F. langsethiae, and F. graminearum; moreover, A. parasiticus was not inhibited at the concentration of 25 mg/mL and the inhibition halo was observed at concentrations of 50 and 100 mg/mL with values of 7 and 11 mm, respectively.
At a concentration of 10 mg/mL, the average inhibition area of all pathogens was 7 mm, the lowest value was 4 mm for F. proliferatum and the highest value was 13 mm for Ph. nicotianae. For the maximum tested concentration of 100 mg/mL, the mean inhibition area was 14 mm, species of Neofusicoccum were the most susceptible to the extracts with an inhibition halo of 27 mm, while the minimum value of 10 mm was obtained on P. brevicopactum, F. langsethiae, and F. poae.
Both extracts were shown to have inhibitory activity on all tested pathogens. In particular, the extract of T. asperellum was more effective, as it was able to inhibit at the minimum concentration (10 mg/mL) of A. parasiticus, the major fungus responsible for aflatoxin formation in crop seeds [20].
Interestingly, a week after test initiation, the inhibition halo persisted (Figure 1 and Figure 2), thus showing that these extracts have a great inhibition potential in vitro.
The results of the quantitative analysis of the EtOAc extracts obtained with the MIC and MFC are shown in Table 2. The MIC of T. asperellum IMI 393899 extract ranged between 0.09 and 0.78 mg/mL and values of MFC were in the range of 0.19–1.56 mg/mL.
Table 2.
Strains | EtOAc Extract of | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
T. asperellum | T. atroviride | |||
MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC | |
Neofusicoccum batangarum | 0.39 | 0.78 | 3.13 | 3.13 |
Neofusicoccum parvum | 0.78 | 0.78 | 3.13 | 6.25 |
Colletotrichum acutatum | 0.39 | 1.56 | 1.56 | 3.13 |
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides | 0.39 | 1.56 | 1.56 | 3.13 |
Phytophthora parvispora | 0.39 | 0.78 | 1.56 | 3.13 |
Phytophthora nicotianae | 0.19 | 0.78 | 1.56 | 3.13 |
Penicillium digitatum | 0.09 | 0.39 | 0.19 | 0.39 |
Penicillium commune | 0.09 | 0.39 | 0.19 | 0.39 |
Penicillium expansum | 0.09 | 0.39 | 0.19 | 0.78 |
Penicillium roqueforti | 0.09 | 0.39 | 0.19 | 0.39 |
Penicillium camemberti | 0.19 | 0.78 | 0.39 | 0.78 |
Penicillium brevicopactum | 0.09 | 0.39 | 0.19 | 0.78 |
Penicillium verrucosum | 0.39 | 0.78 | 1.56 | 1.56 |
Aspergillus parasiticus | 0.39 | 0.78 | 3.13 | 6.25 |
Aspergillus flavus | 0.39 | 0.78 | 3,13 | 6.25 |
Aspergillus niger | 0.39 | 0.78 | 1.56 | 3.13 |
Aspergillus steynii | 0.09 | 0.19 | 0.78 | 1.56 |
Aspergillus carbonarius | 0.39 | 0.78 | 1.56 | 3.13 |
Aspergillus lacticoffeatus | 0.39 | 0.78 | 3.13 | 3.13 |
Fusarium proliferatum | 0.39 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 |
Fusarium verticillioides | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 1.56 |
Fusarium sporotrichoides | 0.19 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 0.78 |
Fusarium langsethiae | 0.39 | 1.56 | 0.78 | 1.56 |
Fusarium poae | 0.39 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 |
Fusarium graminearum | 0.39 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 1.56 |
The extract of T. atroviride TS, despite higher concentrations, proved effective with values in the range of 0.19–3.13 and 0.39–6.25 mg/mL of MIC and MFC, respectively.
Penicillium spp. were the most susceptible to the antifungal activity of both extracts; these pathogens are among the most common in postharvest rot, which cause significant economic damage due to loss of production [21].
3.2. Antagonistic Properties
In the first method, inhibition by direct contact and/or by secretion of metabolites, both Trichoderma species showed an inhibition of the mycelial growth of all the tested pathogens. Table 3 shows the PIRG observed on the first, third, and seventh day of the test. In some cases, the inhibition is observed from the first day and, as matter of fact, it appears that the growth rate of the pathogen could influence the efficiency of Trichoderma in inhibiting the growth of the pathogen. This observation is supported by Vinale et al. [22] who demonstrated that the production and the class of metabolites produced by Trichoderma are influenced by the presence and type of host pathogen.
Table 3.
Strains | Trichoderma asperellum | Trichoderma atroviride | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Day | Third Day | Seventh Day | First Day | Third Day | Seventh Day | |
Neofusicoccum batangarum | 3.64 ± 1.82 | 37.78 ± 2.00 | 63.75 ± 2.6 * | 14.55 ± 3.64 | 36.67 ± 1.67 | 67.50 ± 1.44 * |
Neofusicoccum parvum | 6.45 ± 3.23 | 43.75 ± 0.83 | 54.17 ± 0.42 * | 8.06 ± 2.79 | 41.35 ± 0.48 | 63.33 ± 2.32 * |
Colletotrichum acutatum | ND a | 3.17 ± 1.59 | 46.28 ± 2.19 | ND | ND | 47.93 ± 1.43 |
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides | ND | 10.26 ± 1.28 | 59.01 ± 0 * | 13.33 ± 3.33 | 14.10 ± 1.28 | 58.39 ± 2.24 |
Phytophthora parvispora | ND | 9.09 ± 0 | 48.62 ± 0.92 * | ND | 9.09 ± 0 | 44.95 ± 0 |
Phytophthora nicotianae | 5.77 ± 1.92 | 22.39 ± 1.49 | 76.24 ± 2.97 * | 7.69 ± 0 | 25.37 ± 1.49 | 81.19 ± 0.99 * |
Penicillium digitatum | ND | 3.03 ± 1.52 | 56.52 ± 1.26 * | ND | ND | 71.01 ± 2.61 * |
Penicillium commune | ND | 20.00 ± 4.00 | 51.85 ± 1.85 | ND | 12.00 ± 4.00 | 68.52 ± 1.85 * |
Penicillium expansum | ND | ND | 18.18 ± 3.15 | ND | ND | 30.91 ± 7.93 |
Penicillium roqueforti | ND | ND | 51.67 ± 0.83 * | ND | 7.02 ± 1.75 | 75.83 ± 6.01 * |
Penicillium camemberti | ND | ND | 25.71 ± 12.45 | ND | 9.09 ± 4.55 | 28.57 ± 10.30 |
Penicillium brevicopactum | ND | 11.11 ± 5.56 | 43.90 ± 2.44 | ND | 22.22 ± 14.70 | 68.29 ± 4.88 |
Penicillium verrucosum | ND | 15.79 ± 5.26 | 42.42 ± 6.06 * | ND | 21.05 ± 9.12 | 63.64 ± 5.25 * |
Aspergillus parasiticus | 2.70 ± 0 | 4.82 ± 1.20 | 46.05 ± 0.66 | 13.51 ± 2.70 | 16.87 ± 7.23 | 50.00 ± 7.59 |
Aspergillus flavus | ND | 4.11 ± 1.37 | 38.52 ± 0 | ND | 4.11 ± 2.74 | 22.95 ± 3.57 |
Aspergillus niger | ND | 8.99 ± 1.95 | 45.86 ± 1.69 | ND | ND | 41.40 ± 3.87 |
Aspergillus steynii | ND | ND | 42.22 ± 1.11 | ND | ND | 25.56 ± 1.11 * |
Aspergillus carbonarius | ND | 6.82 ± 1.14 | 40.58 ± 0.72 | ND | ND | 23.91 ± 2.17 |
Aspergillus lacticoffeatus | ND | 4.11 ± 2.74 | 34.55 ± 1.57 | 8.11 ± 2.70 | 9.59 ± 4.11 | 21.82 ± 0.91 |
Fusarium proliferatum | ND | 10.94 ± 2.71 | 50 ± 0.96 * | ND | 6.25 ± 0 | 42.31 ± 1.67 * |
Fusarium verticillioides | 7.69 ± 0 | 9.59 ± 0 | 45.83 ± 3.00 | 7.69 ± 0 | 8.22 ± 1.37 | 35.83 ± 1.67 * |
Fusarium sporotrichoides | ND | 5.88 ± 3.11 | 50 ± 2.47 * | ND | 3.53 ± 1.18 | 39.73 ± 1.37 * |
Fusarium langsethiae | ND | 1.67 ± 1.67 | 42.57 ± 0.99 * | ND | 3.33 ± 1.67 | 30.69 ± 5.51 |
Fusarium poae | ND | 12.82 ± 5.13 | 67.15 ± 2.53 * | ND | 2.56 ± 1.28 | 48.91 ± 1.93 * |
Fusarium graminearum | ND | 3.03 ± 3.03 | 61.19 ± 5.22 * | ND | 6.06 ± 1.52 | 51.49 ± 1.97 |
In the case of Penicillium strains with a slower growth rate, the inhibition is observed only on the third day when Trichoderma has filled half of the plate and is close to the pathogen.
On the seventh day, the highest PIRG was observed when Trichoderma came into direct contact with the pathogen. In particular, both Trichoderma strains showed PIRG values higher than 40% and the maximum values of PIRG were obtained for Ph. nicotianae with 76% and 81% for T. asperellum and T. atroviride, respectively. Only P. expansum showed less than 20% radial growth inhibition.
In Figure 3, a 7-day test of F. graminearum, P. commune, and A. parasiticus grown with T. atroviride and T. asperellum clearly demonstrates the inhibition of the growth in comparison with the control (only the pathogen). Control cultures of the tested pathogens showed a faster growth with respect to dual culture. The dual culture plates showed rapid initial growth of the fungus that stopped at the point of contact with the antagonist. In some cases, the biological antagonist was not only able to inhibit the mycelium growth of the pathogen but also it grew on it, causing degradation of the mycelium (Table 3), as in the case of P. commune (Figure 3Ba).
According to the generally accepted definition, antibiosis is the mechanism mediated by specific metabolites such as enzymes, volatile compounds, and nonvolatile antibiotics [23]. The involvement of enzymes in biological control complicates the distinction between mycoparasitism and antibiosis.
Mycoparasitism is one of the main strategies of Trichoderma spp. to antagonize pathogens as supported by previous studies. John et al., 2010 [24] reported mycoparasitic activity from Trichoderma viride on Pythium arrhenomanes and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. adzuki; Trichoderma showed a mycoparasitic activity on both pathogens, but mainly on Pythium. Krauss et al., 1998 [25], showed that the MP11 variety of Trichoderma spp. was able to mycoparasitize various pathogens (Fusarium spp., Colletotrichum spp., Botryodiplodia theobromae, and Nigrospora sphaerica). In another study, Hibar et al., 2005 [26], showed the invasion of the mycelium of Trichoderma harzianum on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici cultures after 6 days in direct contact. Microscopic observations, made at the level of the contact area between T. harzianum and F. oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici, showed a profound change in the mycelium of the pathogen characterized by significant lysis, in which the hyphae of Trichoderma were enveloping those of the pathogen. In the study of Tondje et al., 2007 [27], in which the four strains of Trichoderma were used to control the black pod disease of cocoa caused by a Phytophthora megakarya, the biological principle of their actions was discussed. According to these authors, the mycoparasitic activity of the T. asperellum strains involves both direct penetration and enveloping the hyphae of the pathogen; in the latter case, a high level of hydrolytic enzymes is produced before the destruction of the hyphae.
In the second method of the double culture test, which makes it possible to evaluate the inhibition by secretion of volatile substances, no inhibition was observed for the 3 days in which the test was conducted (data not shown). This may suppose either that the inhibition of the two strains of Trichoderma, T. asperellum IMI 393899 and T. atroviride TS, is not mainly due to the secretion of volatile substances or that antibiotic volatile substances are not normally produced if Trichoderma is not approaching the pathogen.
Calistru et al., 1997 [28], showed that the inhibition growth of A. flavus and F. moniliforme was due to volatile substances produced by two strains of T. harzianum (T1 and T2) and two strains of T. viride (T5 and T6). The growth of A. flavus and F. moniliforme was inhibited when the colonies were exposed to the trapped atmosphere from cultures of Trichoderma spp., with the exception of T. harzianum T1. Trichoderma harzianum T2 only inhibited the growth of A. flavus, while T. harzianum T1 did not reduce the growth of F. moniliforme and A. flavus. This shows that not all Trichoderma strains are able to inhibit the in vitro growth by producing volatile substances.
3.3. Identification of VOCs and nVOCs
A total of 62 VOCs was identified in the lyophilized samples of Trichoderma strains and only seven were also present in the control medium (PDB). The VOCs identified in the lyophilized culture filtrates of the two Trichoderma strains and the control medium with a percentage > 0.01% are shown in Table 4. The identified compounds are classified according to the chemical class into alcohols, aldehydes, acids, ketones, pyrazines, esters, and others.
Table 4.
Compound (VOCs) | Strains | |
---|---|---|
Trichoderma asperellum | Trichoderma atroviride | |
Alcohols | ||
Ethanol | 0.58 ± 0.01 | 1.02 ± 0.07 |
2-methyl-1-propanol | 0.70 ± 0.01 | 0.68 ± 0.05 |
3-methyl-1-butanol | 4.47 ± 0.13 | 5.29 ± 0.23 |
3-methyl acetate-1-butanol | 0.35 ± 0.01 | ND |
2-methyl acetate-1-butanol | 0.18 ± 0.01 | ND |
Benzyl alcohol | 0.35 ± 0.05 | ND |
Phenylethyl Alcohol | 19.06 ± 0.08 | ND |
1-phenyl-2-propanol | ND * | 0.15 ± 0 |
2-(4-methoxyphenyl)ethanol | 0.71 ± 0.03 | ND |
Aldehydes | ||
Benzaldehyde | 0.13 ± 0 | 0.20 ± 0 |
Benzeneacetaldehyde | 0.06 ± 0 | 0.91 ± 0.04 |
3-methyl-benzaldehyde | 0.30 ± 0.01 | ND |
Nonanal | ND | 0.11 ± 0 |
Acids | ||
1-methyl-6-oxopyridine-3-carboxylic acid | ND | 0.20 ± 0.01 |
Ketones | ||
2,3-butandione | ND | 1.25 ± 0.04 |
3-ethyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one | 0.41 ± 0.03 | 0.87 ± 0.08 |
Phenylacetone | ND | 0.23 ± 0.02 |
5,6,6-trimethyl-3,4-undecadiene-2,10-dione | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 1.55 ± 0.02 |
Pyrazines | ||
Trimethyl pyrazine | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.43 ± 0.03 |
Tetramethyl pyrazine | 4.81 ± 0.04 | 56.79 ± 0.29 |
2,3,5-trimethyl-6-ethylpyrazine | 0.45 ± 0.01 | 1 ± 0.06 |
2,3,5-trimethyl-6-propylpyrazine | 0.14 ± 0 | 0.14 ± 0.01 |
2-methyl-3,5-diethylpyrazine | ND | 0.74 ± 0.02 |
Trimethylisobutylpyrazine | ND | 0.86 ± 0.07 |
2,3-dimethyl-5-(1-propenyl)pyrazine | 0.04 ± 0 | ND |
Esters | ||
Ethyl acetate | 0.62 ± 0.01 | 0.46 ± 0 |
Ethyl isobutyrate | 0.15 ± 0.02 | ND |
Isobutyl butanoate | 0.22 ± 0.01 | ND |
Ethyl β-hydroxybutyrate | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0 |
Isoamyl 2-methylpropanoate | 0.18 ± 0.01 | ND |
Butyl isobutyrate | 0.10 ± 0 | ND |
Ethyl 3-acetoxybutanoate | ND | 0.34 ± 0.01 |
β-phenylethyl formate | 0.14 ± 0.01 | ND |
Ethyl benzeneacetate | ND | 1.16 ± 0.09 |
2-phenethyl acetate | 1.15 ± 0.05 | ND |
Pentanoic acid, oct-4-yl ester | ND | 0.66 ± 0.07 |
Isobutyl phenylacetate | ND | 0.08 ± 0.01 |
α-phenylethyl butyrate | 0.41 ± 0.01 | ND |
Butyl adipate | ND | 0.26 ± 0.02 |
Others | ||
2,2-diphenyl-2H-1-benzopyran | 0.22 ± 0.02 | ND |
Trimethyloxazole | ND | 0.83 ± 0.03 |
2-pentyl furan | 0.19 ± 0.01 | ND |
Methyl hydroxytriazaindolizine | 0.08 ± 0 | ND |
5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-methyl-4H-chromen-4-one | 0.23 ± 0.01 | 1.38 ± 0.08 |
Methyl 3,4-di-O-acetyl-2-O-methylfucofuranoside | 0.16 ± 0.01 | ND |
1,3-di-tert-butylbenzene | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.48 ± 0.18 |
2,4-dimethyl-3-acetylpyrrole | ND | 0.29 ± 0.04 |
6,7-dimethyl-1,2,3,5,8,8a-hexahydronaphthalene | 0.22 ± 0.03 | ND |
3-methylhexyl isothiocyanate | ND | 1.39 ± 0.10 |
6-pentyl-alpha-pyrone | 42.66 ± 0.15 | 0.26 ± 0 |
α-Himachalene | 2.14 ± 0.13 | 0.61 ± 0.01 |
α-Zingiberene | 5.86 ± 0.01 | 2.67 ± 0.14 |
1-hydroxy-2,4-di-tert-butylbenzene | 2.50 ± 0.04 | 6.17 ± 0.04 |
Butylated hydroxytoluene | 0.58 ± 0.01 | 1.66 ± 0.11 |
α-Sesquiphellandrene | 6.60 ± 0.07 | 2.43 ± 0.05 |
Nerolidol | ND | 0.86 ± 0.01 |
Cedrene | 0.34 ± 0.08 | ND |
6,7-dihydro-2-trans-farnesol | 0.63 ± 0.04 | ND |
1,2,4,4,6-pentamethyl-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile | ND | 1.19 ± 0.01 |
Ledol | 0.95 ± 0.02 | 3.04 ± 0.36 |
Phenol, 2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-(1-methyl-1-phenylethyl | 0.26 ± 0 | 1.15 ± 0.76 |
* Not Determined.
Both culture filtrates presented high levels of alcohols and pyrazines compared to the control. Among the compounds most identified in T. asperellum IMI 393899 culture filtrate were 3-methyl-1-butanol (4.47%), phenylethyl alcohol (19.06%), tetramethyl pyrazine (4.81%), 6-pentyl-alpha-pyrone (42.66%), α-Zingiberene (5.86%), and α-Sesquiphellandrene (6.60%), while in the culture filtrate of T. atroviride TS were 3-methylbutanol (5.29%), tetramethylpyrazine (56.79%), and 1-Hydroxy-2.4-di-tert-butylbenzene (6.17%).
The compound 6-pentyl-alpha-pyrone (6-PP) is an unsaturated lactone with a strong coconut-like aroma, which was first characterized by Collins & Halim (1972) [29], and identified to be one of the bioactive compounds of several species of Trichoderma, such as T. viride [29], T. harzianum [30,31], and T. atroviride [32,33]. The biological effects of 6-PP are the reduction of the production of the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol by F. graminearum [34] and the fusaric acid by F. moniliform [35]; moreover, it exerts antifungal properties, reducing the mycelial growth rate of Rhizoctonia solani and F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici [36]. Finally, Vinale et al., 2008 [37] reported that 6-PP has a growth-promoting effect on tomato seedlings which compared to control plants had a more extensive and vigorous root system.
Tetramethylpyrazine, also known as Lanzorite, is a compound belonging to the alkylpyrazines with the characteristic nutty and roasted flavor [38]; it has been found in fermented cocoa beans and soybeans fermented by Bacillus spp. [39,40]. There is no report in the literature on this substance produced by Trichoderma spp.
Pyrazines are known as substances with antifungal and nematicidal activity [41,42], previous studies have shown that tetramethylpyrazine inhibits the growth of Moniliophthora perniciosa and F. oxysporum f. sp. lactucae [43].
The analysis of the nonvolatile organic compounds (nVOCs) of the culture filtrates of Trichoderma strains tested, T. asperellum IMI 393899 and T. atroviride TS, led to the identification of 12 molecules present in the literature, namely, diterpene lactone trichodermaerin, peptabolite asperilins A, H, and E, dicheto pyrazine methylcordysinin A, steroids 3,5,9-trihydroxyergosta-7,22-dien-6-one and ergosta-7,22-dien-3-ol, sterol beta-sitosterol, adenine nucleoside, cyclopentenone atrichodermone B, sesquiterpene atrichodermone C, and the pyrone derivative 6-penta-1-enyl-pyran-2-one.
The molecules identified in the extract after 10 and 30 days and their molecular structure are shown in Table 5 and in Figure 4. All the molecules known for their antimicrobial activity were recovered in the extract of the culture filtrate after 30 days with the exception of beta-sitosterol and ergosta-7,22-dien-3-ol found in the 10-day extracts. This could explain why the 30-day extracts were more active than the 10-day ones. In particular, 3,5,9-trihydroxyergosta-7,22-dien-6-one was isolated from Trichoderma spp. by Xuan et al., 2014 [44] and showed antimicrobial properties against E. coli, B. subtilis, P. oryzae, C. albicans, A. niger, and A. alternata. Beta-sitosterol isolated from T. asperellum [45] and T. harzianum [46] showed inhibitory activity against R. solani, S. rolfsii, M. phaseolina, and F. oxysporum [46].
Table 5.
Compound (nVOCs) | MW | Molecular Formula | m/z | Ion | RT | Days of Fermentation | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trichodermaerin | 316.20 | C20 H28 O3 | 317.2104 | [M+H]+ | 15.9 | 30 | [47] |
Aspereline H | 978.62 | C47 H82 N10 O12 | 977.6099 | [M-H]− | 16.7 | 10 | [48] |
Aspereline A | 936.60 | C45 H80 N10 O11 | 935.5956 | [M-H]− | 19.3 | 10 | [48] |
Aspereline E | 952.60 | C45 H80 N10 O12 | 951.5935 | [M-H]− | 16.6 | 10 | [48] |
Methylcordysinin A | 240.15 | C12 H20 N2 O3 | 299.1628 | [M+CH3COO]− | 20.7 | 10 | [49] |
3,5,9-trihydroxyergosta-7,22-dien- 6-one | 444.32 | C28 H44 O4 | 489.3224 | [M-HCOO]− | 9.4 | 30 | [44] |
Ergosta-7,22-dien-3-ol | 398.36 | C28 H46 O | 397.3486 | [M-H]− | 30.3 | 10–30 | [45] |
Beta-sitosterol | 414.39 | C29 H50 O | 413.3784 | [M-H]− | 33.3 | 10 | [47] |
Adenine nucleoside | 267.10 | C10 H13 N5 O4 | 312.0953 | [M-HCOO]− | 5.5 | 30 | [45] |
Atrichodermone B | 156.08 | C8 H12 O3 | 215.0914 | [M+CH3COO]− | 9.3 | 30 | [50] |
Atrichodermone C | 236.18 | C15 H24 O2 | 295.1906 | [M+CH3COO]− | 23.5 | 30 | [50] |
6-pent-1-enyl-pyran-2-one | 164.08 | C10 H12 O2 | 165.0915 | [M+H]+ | 9.9 | 30 | [51] |
However, a few studies on the identification of nVOCs produced by Trichoderma spp. are present in the literature and many more studies should be performed to understand the antimicrobial activity of the secondary metabolites produced.
4. Conclusions
The two Trichoderma strains tested in this study, T. asperellum IMI 393899 and T. atroviride TS, inhibited the growth of tested pathogens when they came in contact with them. In particular, the extract of T. asperellum showed the highest inhibition activity and was active even at a low concentration. Moreover, it was demonstrated that both Trichoderma strains produced compounds with antifungal activity against the pathogenic fungi and oomycetes tested.
These results highlight the potential use of these two Trichoderma strains as antagonists in biological control of plant pathogens and their ability to produce secondary bioactive metabolites that might be used for the management of crop and postharvest diseases as an alternative to synthetic fungicides.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Ann Davies for the English revision of the text.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, C.S., G.M., and S.O.C.; methodology, C.S. and J.M.Q.; validation, G.M. and S.O.C.; formal analysis, S.O.C.; investigation, C.S. and J.M.Q.; resources, G.M. and S.O.C.; data curation, G.M.; writing—original draft preparation, C.S.; writing—review and editing, C.S., J.M.Q., G.M., and S.O.C.; supervision, G.M. and S.O.C.; project administration, G.M. and S.O.C.; funding acquisition, G.M. and S.O.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by “MIUR-FFABR 2017” of S.O.C., grant number 5A725192051; University of Catania, “project DIFESA” of S.O.C., grant number 5A722192134, by the Ministry of Science and Innovation (PID2019-108070RB-100), and by the project Prometeo/2018/126 supported by Generalitat Valenciana. This study is part of C.S. activity as PhD “Agricultural, Food and Forestry Science,” Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria (UNIRC), XXXIII cycle. C.S. was granted with a Ph.D. scholarship from UNIRC.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Wightwick A., Walters R., Allinson G., Reichman S., Menzies N. Fungicides. InTech; Rijeke, Croatria: 2010. Environmental Risks of Fungicides Used in Horticultural Production Systems; pp. 273–304. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tinker P.B. Biológical Processes and Soil Fertility. Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 1984. The Role of Microorganisms in Mediating and Facilitating the Uptake of Plant Nutrients from Soil; pp. 77–91. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brent K.J., Hollomon D.W. Fungicide Resistance: The Assessment of Risk. 2nd ed. FRAC Mongr; Brussels, Belgium: 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fravel D.R. Commercialization and Implementation of Biocontrol. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2005;43:337–359. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.032904.092924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Harman G.E., Howell C.R., Viterbo A., Chet I., Lorito M. Trichoderma Species—Opportunistic, Avirulent Plant Symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004;2:43–56. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Köhl J., Kolnaar R., Ravensberg W.J. Mode of Action of Microbial Biological Control Agents against Plant Diseases: Relevance beyond Efficacy. Front. Plant Sci. 2019;10:845. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cardoza R.-E., Hermosa M.-R., Vizcaíno J.-A., Sanz L., Monte E., Gutiérrez S. Secondary Metabolites Produced by Trichoderma and Their Importance in the Biocontrol Process. Microorg. Ind. Enzym. Biocontrol. 2005;1:207–228. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Peñuelas J., Asensio D., Tholl D., Wenke K., Rosenkranz M., Piechulla B., Schnitzler J.P. Biogenic Volatile Emissions from the Soil. Plant Cell Environ. 2014;37:1866–1891. doi: 10.1111/pce.12340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Amponsah N.T., Jones E.E., Ridgway H.J., Jaspers M.V. Production of Botryosphaeria Species Conidia Using Grapevine Green Shoots. N. Z. Plant Prot. 2008;61:301–305. doi: 10.30843/nzpp.2008.61.6840. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nyadanu D., Assuah M.K., Adomako B., Asiama Y.P., Opoku I.Y., Adu-Ampomah Y. Efficacy of Screening Methods Used in Breeding for Black Pod Disease Resistance Varieties in Cocoa. Afr. Crop Sci. J. 2009;17:175–186. doi: 10.4314/acsj.v17i4.54298. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sinclair J.B., Dhingra O.D. Basic Plant Pathology Methods. CRC press; Boca Ratón, FL, USA: 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cacciola S.O., Puglisi I., Faedda R., Sanzaro V., Pane A., Piero A.R.L., Evoli M., Petrone G. Cadmium Induces Cadmium-Tolerant Gene Expression in the Filamentous Fungus Trichoderma Harzianum. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2015;42:1559–1570. doi: 10.1007/s11033-015-3924-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Puglisi I., Faedda R., Sanzaro V., Piero A.R.L., Petrone G., Cacciola S.O. Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes in Response to Mercury I and II Stress in Trichoderma Harzianum. Gene. 2012;506:325–330. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.06.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.White T.J., Bruns T., Lee S., Taylor J. Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. PCR Protoc. A Guide Methods Appl. 1990;18:315–322. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Finch. [(accessed on 18 May 2019)]; Available online: https://finchtv.software.informer.com/1.4/
- 16.GeneBank. [(accessed on 18 May 2019)]; Available online: https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi.
- 17.Petrikkou E., Rodriguez-Tudela J.L., Cuenca-Estrella M., Gomez A., Molleja A., Mellado E. Inoculum Standardization for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi Pathogenic for Humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001;39:1345–1347. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1345-1347.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Guarrasi V., Sannino C., Moschetti M., Bonanno A., Di Grigoli A., Settanni L. The Individual Contribution of Starter and Non-Starter Lactic Acid Bacteria to the Volatile Organic Compound Composition of Caciocavallo Palermitano Cheese. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017;259:35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Denardi-Souza T., Luz C., Mañes J., Badiale-Furlong E., Meca G. Antifungal Effect of Phenolic Extract of Fermented Rice Bran with Rhizopus Oryzae and Its Potential Use in Loaf Bread Shelf Life Extension. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018;98:5011–5018. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Klich M.A. Environmental and Developmental Factors Influencing Aflatoxin Production by Aspergillus Flavus and Aspergillus Parasiticus. Mycoscience. 2007;48:71–80. doi: 10.1007/S10267-006-0336-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ibatsam K., Rukhsana B. Prevalence of Post-Harvest Rot of Fruits and Vegetables by Penicillium Species. Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. 2014;1:14–19. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vinale F., Ghisalberti E.L., Sivasithamparam K., Marra R., Ritieni A., Ferracane R., Woo S., Lorito M. Factors Affecting the Production of Trichoderma Harzianum Secondary Metabolites during the Interaction with Different Plant Pathogens. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2009;48:705–711. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02599.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fravel D.R. Role of Antibiosis in the Biocontrol of Plant Diseases. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1988;26:75–91. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.26.090188.000451. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.John R.P., Tyagi R.D., Prévost D., Brar S.K., Pouleur S., Surampalli R.Y. Mycoparasitic Trichoderma Viride as a Biocontrol Agent against Fusarium Oxysporum f. Sp. Adzuki and Pythium Arrhenomanes and as a Growth Promoter of Soybean. Crop Prot. 2010;29:1452–1459. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2010.08.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Krauss U., Bidwell R., Ince J. Isolation and Preliminary Evaluation of Mycoparasites as Biocontrol Agents of Crown Rot of Banana. Biol. Control. 1998;13:111–119. doi: 10.1006/bcon.1998.0651. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hibar K., Daami-Remadi M., Khiareddine H., El Mahjoub M. Effet Inhibiteur in Vitro et in Vivo Du Trichoderma Harzianum Sur Fusarium Oxysporum f. Sp. Radicis-Lycopersici. BASE. 2005;9:163–171. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tondje P.R., Roberts D.P., Bon M.C., Widmer T., Samuels G.J., Ismaiel A., Begoude A.D., Tchana T., Nyemb-Tshomb E., Ndoumbe-Nkeng M. Isolation and Identification of Mycoparasitic Isolates of Trichoderma Asperellum with Potential for Suppression of Black Pod Disease of Cacao in Cameroon. Biol. Control. 2007;43:202–212. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.08.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Calistru C., McLean M., Berjak P. In Vitro Studies on the Potential for Biological Control of Aspergillus Flavus and Fusarium Moniliforme by Trichoderma Species. Mycopathologia. 1997;137:115–124. doi: 10.1023/A:1006802423729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Collins R.P., Halim A.F. Characterization of the Major Aroma Constituent of the Fungus Trichoderma Viride. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1972;20:437–438. doi: 10.1021/jf60180a010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Claydon N., Allan M., Hanson J.R., Avent A.G. Antifungal Alkyl Pyrones of Trichoderma Harzianum. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1987;88:503–513. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1536(87)80034-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bonnarme P., Djian A., Latrasse A., Féron G., Ginies C., Durand A., Le Quéré J.-L. Production of 6-Pentyl-α-Pyrone by Trichoderma Sp. from Vegetable Oils. J. Biotechnol. 1997;56:143–150. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1656(97)00108-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Reithner B., Brunner K., Schuhmacher R., Peissl I., Seidl V., Krska R., Zeilinger S. The G Protein α Subunit Tga1 of Trichoderma Atroviride Is Involved in Chitinase Formation and Differential Production of Antifungal Metabolites. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2005;42:749–760. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Reithner B., Schuhmacher R., Stoppacher N., Pucher M., Brunner K., Zeilinger S. Signaling via the Trichoderma Atroviride Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Tmk1 Differentially Affects Mycoparasitism and Plant Protection. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2007;44:1123–1133. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cooney J.M., Lauren D.R., di Menna M.E. Impact of Competitive Fungi on Trichothecene Production by Fusarium Graminearum. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001;49:522–526. doi: 10.1021/jf0006372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.El-Hasan A., Walker F., Schöne J., Buchenauer H. Antagonistic Effect of 6-Pentyl-Alpha-Pyrone Produced by Trichoderma Harzianum toward Fusarium Moniliforme. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2007;114:62–68. doi: 10.1007/BF03356205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Scarselletti R., Faull J.L. In Vitro Activity of 6-Pentyl-α-Pyrone, a Metabolite of Trichoderma Harzianum, in the Inhibition of Rhizoctonia Solani and Fusarium Oxysporum f. Sp. Lycopersici. Mycol. Res. 1994;98:1207–1209. doi: 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80206-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vinale F., Sivasithamparam K., Ghisalberti E.L., Marra R., Barbetti M.J., Li H., Woo S.L., Lorito M. A Novel Role for Trichoderma Secondary Metabolites in the Interactions with Plants. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2008;72:80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2008.05.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rosales E., Pazos M., Sanromán M.Á. Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherland: 2018. Solid-State Fermentation for Food Applications; pp. 319–355. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hashim P., Selamat J., Syed Muhammad S.K., Ali A. Effect of Mass and Turning Time on Free Amino Acid, Peptide-N, Sugar and Pyrazine Concentration during Cocoa Fermentation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1998;78:543–550. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199812)78:4<543::AID-JSFA152>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Besson I., Creuly C., Gros J.B., Larroche C. Pyrazine Production by Bacillus Subtilis in Solid-State Fermentation on Soybeans. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997;47:489–495. doi: 10.1007/s002530050961. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gu Y.-Q., Mo M.-H., Zhou J.-P., Zou C.-S., Zhang K.-Q. Evaluation and Identification of Potential Organic Nematicidal Volatiles from Soil Bacteria. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2007;39:2567–2575. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.05.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chen H., Xiao X., Wang J., Wu L., Zheng Z., Yu Z. Antagonistic Effects of Volatiles Generated by Bacillus Subtilis on Spore Germination and Hyphal Growth of the Plant Pathogen, Botrytis Cinerea. Biotechnol. Lett. 2008;30:919–923. doi: 10.1007/s10529-007-9626-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chaves-López C., Serio A., Gianotti A., Sacchetti G., Ndagijimana M., Ciccarone C., Stellarini A., Corsetti A., Paparella A. Diversity of Food-Borne Bacillus Volatile Compounds and Influence on Fungal Growth. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015;119:487–499. doi: 10.1111/jam.12847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Xuan Q.-C., Huang R., Miao C.-P., Chen Y.-W., Zhai Y.-Z., Song F., Wang T., Wu S.-H. Secondary Metabolites of Endophytic Fungus Trichoderma Sp. Ym 311505 of Azadirachta Indica. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2014;50:139–141. doi: 10.1007/s10600-014-0891-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Li M.-F., Li G.-H., Zhang K.-Q. Non-Volatile Metabolites from Trichoderma Spp. Metabolites. 2019;9:58. doi: 10.3390/metabo9030058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ahluwalia V., Kumar J., Rana V.S., Sati O.P., Walia S. Comparative Evaluation of Two Trichoderma Harzianum Strains for Major Secondary Metabolite Production and Antifungal Activity. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015;29:914–920. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2014.958739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chantrapromma S., Jeerapong C., Phupong W., Quah C.K., Fun H.-K. Trichodermaerin: A Diterpene Lactone from Trichoderma Asperellum. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E Struct. Rep. Online. 2014;70:o408–o409. doi: 10.1107/S1600536814004632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chen L., Zhong P., Pan J.-R. Asperelines G and H, Two New Peptaibols from the Marine-Derived Fungus Trichoderma Asperellum. Heterocycles Int. J. Rev. Commun. Heterocycl. Chem. 2013;87:645–655. doi: 10.3987/COM-12-12644. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Song Y.-P., Miao F.-P., Fang S.-T., Yin X.-L., Ji N.-Y. Halogenated and Nonhalogenated Metabolites from the Marine-Alga-Endophytic Fungus Trichoderma Asperellum Cf44-2. Mar. Drugs. 2018;16:266. doi: 10.3390/md16080266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zhou P., Wu Z., Tan D., Yang J., Zhou Q., Zeng F., Zhang M., Bie Q., Chen C., Xue Y. Atrichodermones A–C, Three New Secondary Metabolites from the Solid Culture of an Endophytic Fungal Strain, Trichoderma Atroviride. Fitoterapia. 2017;123:18–22. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2017.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.McMullin D.R., Renaud J.B., Barasubiye T., Sumarah M.W., Miller J.D. Metabolites of Trichoderma Species Isolated from Damp Building Materials. Can. J. Microbiol. 2017;63:621–632. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2017-0083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]