Skip to main content
Neuro-Oncology logoLink to Neuro-Oncology
. 2020 Dec 4;22(Suppl 3):iii304. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.126

EPCT-01. PHASE I STUDY OF DAY101 (TAK580) IN CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS WITH RADIOGRAPHICALLY RECURRENT OR PROGRESSIVE LOW-GRADE GLIOMA (LGG)

Karen Wright 1, Emily Krzykwa 1, Lianne Greenspan 1, Susan Chi 1, Kee Kiat Yeo 1, Sabine Mueller 2, Michael Prados 2, Daphne Haas-Kogan 1,3
PMCID: PMC7715228

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We report a phase I study examining pharmacokinetics, safety and recommended dosage of the type 2 RAF inhibitor DAY101 in children/young adults with radiographically recurrent/progressive LGGs harboring MAPK pathway alterations.

METHODS

Applying a 3 + 3 design, patients < 18 years of age with radiographically recurrent/progressive LGG received oral DAY101 weekly for 4-week cycles up to a maximum of 2 years, if deriving clinical benefit. The starting DAY101 dosage was 280 mg/m2. Dose limiting toxicities were determined after one cycle.

RESULTS

We treated nine eligible patients at 280, 350, and 420 mg/m2. Eight patients had KIAA1549:BRAF fusions. One patient with NF1 did not have a biopsy. There were no DLTs. Weekly administration of DAY101 in children resulted in dose-proportional increases in Cmax and AUC similar to that described in adults. A 2.2-fold mg/kg exposure difference was observed with respect to weight-based dosing and suggested a correlation to best radiographic RANO responses of 2 complete responses, 2 partial responses, 3 stable disease, and 2 progressive disease (independently-reviewed). Median time to response was 10.5 weeks (range: 8–32 weeks).

CONCLUSION

The phase 1A data provide initial pharmacokinetic parameters to describe oral weekly dosing of DAY101 in pediatric patients with radiographically recurrent/progressive LGG. Plasma exposures of DAY101 achieved in adults can be reached in pediatric patients. Oral weekly DAY101 is well-tolerated and possesses anti-tumor activity. The amended protocol will explore additional dose levels and the potential for differential dosing to achieve similar responses across a variety of BSAs.


Articles from Neuro-Oncology are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuro-Oncology and Oxford University Press

RESOURCES