Skip to main content
Neural Regeneration Research logoLink to Neural Regeneration Research
. 2020 May 11;15(11):2098–2107. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.280319

Human equivalent dose of oral 4-aminopyridine differentiates nerve crush injury from transection injury and improves post-injury function in mice

Chia George Hsu 2,#, M A Hassan Talukder 1,#, Li Yue 3, Loel C Turpin 4, Mark Noble 5, John C Elfar 1,*
PMCID: PMC7716044  PMID: 32394968

graphic file with name NRR-15-2098-g001.jpg

Keywords: 4-aminopyridine, electron microscopy of nerves, functional recovery, gene expression, muscle force, muscle mass, oral administration, pharmacokinetics, sciatic nerve crush injury, sciatic nerve denervation injury

Abstract

4-Aminopyridine (4-AP), an FDA-approved drug for the symptomatic treatment of multiple sclerosis, is used to improve neuromuscular function in patients with diverse demyelinating disorders. We recently demonstrated that local, transdermal or injectable forms of 4-AP improve myelination, nerve conduction velocity, muscle atrophy, and motor function after traumatic peripheral nerve injury in mice. While oral 4-AP is most commonly used in the clinic, it is unknown whether human equivalent oral doses of 4-AP have effects on traumatic peripheral nerve injury differentiation, myelination, muscle atrophy, functional recovery, and post-injury inflammatory processes in animals. Mice with sciatic nerve crush or denervation injury received oral or intraperitoneal 4-AP (10 μg) or vehicle alone and were examined for pharmacokinetics, motor function, muscle mass, intrinsic muscle force, nerve morphological and gene expression profiles. 4-AP showed linear pharmacokinetics and the maximum plasma 4-AP concentrations were proportional to 4-AP dose. Acute single dose of oral 4-AP administration induced a rapid transient improvement in motor function that was different in traumatic peripheral nerve injury with or without nerve continuity, chronic daily oral 4-AP treatment significantly enhanced post crush injury motor function recovery and this effect was associated with improved myelination, muscle mass, and ex vivo muscle force. Polymerase chain reaction array analysis with crushed nerve revealed significant alterations in gene involved in axonal inflammation and regeneration. These findings provide convincing evidence that regardless of the route of administration, 4-AP can acutely differentiate traumatic peripheral nerve injury with or without nerve continuity and can enhance in vivo functional recovery with better preservation of myelin sheaths, muscle mass, and muscle force. The animal experiments were approved by the University Committee on Animal Research (UCAR) at the University of Rochester (UCAR-2009-019) on March 31, 2017.


Chinese Library Classification No. R453; R364; R741

Introduction

4-Aminopyridine (4-AP) is a broad-spectrum potassium channel blocker and FDA-approved drug for the symptomatic treatment of multiple sclerosis (Egeberg et al., 2012; Jensen et al., 2016). 4-AP has been shown to improve neuromuscular function in patients with diverse demyelinating disorders (Lundh et al., 1979; Hansebout et al., 1993; Sanders et al., 2000; Wirtz et al., 2009). In addition to improving nerve conduction (Sherratt et al., 1980; Targ and Kocsis, 1985), 4-AP enhances neurotransmitter release (Lundh, 1978), synaptic transmission (Jankowska et al., 1982), and contractile strength of the muscle (Agoston et al., 1982; Smith et al., 2000). The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 4-AP are well documented in demyelinating disorders (Uges et al., 1982; Davis et al., 1990; van Diemen et al., 1993; Pratt et al., 1995; Goodman and Stone, 2013).

Traumatic peripheral nerve injury (TPNI) represents a major public health problem that often leads to significant functional impairment and permanent disability (Robinson, 2000). After never injury, the distal stump of the injured nerve undergoes a series of molecular and cellular changes, and a complex interaction exists between macrophages, fibroblasts, Schwann cells, inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines during Wallerian degeneration (Allan and Rothwell, 2001; Stoll et al., 2002; Burnett and Zager, 2004; Campbell, 2008; Gaudet et al., 2011; Dubovy et al., 2013; Menorca et al., 2013). Schwann cells and macrophages in the injured nerves express pro-inflammatory cytokines and these in turn can induce the transcription of several enzymes (Terenghi, 1999; McDonald et al., 2007). Differential expression of genes has been reported after sciatic nerve crush and transection injuries in rats (Gillen et al., 1995; Bosse et al., 2001; Li et al., 2013). However, gene expression profile during peripheral nerve injury and regeneration in mice remains largely unknown and the effect of 4-AP on the gene expression profile of injured nerve is still lacking.

We previously demonstrated that chronic daily treatment with variable doses of 4-AP, either intraperitoneal, transdermal or local, enhances global functional recovery of the affected limb, promotes remyelination of the nerve, improves the nerve conduction velocity, and attenuates neurogenic muscle atrophy in a mouse model of sciatic nerve crush injury, in addition to its acute diagnostic utility (Tseng et al., 2016; Clark et al., 2019; Noble et al., 2019; Yue et al., 2019). The oral formulation is the most commonly used form of a drug because it is easy, preferred by the patient, and sustained slow-release preparation is available for prolonged duration of action. However, it is unknown whether human equivalent oral doses of 4-AP have any effect in TPNI. It also remains unknown whether the beneficial effect of 4-AP on muscle mass and force (Yue et al., 2019) depends on the nerve continuity and how gene expression is altered in the injured nerves. This study was designed to address these gaps by testing the acute effect of human equivalent oral dosage of 4-AP on TPNI with or without nerve continuity, and the chronic effect of oral 4-AP treatment was also investigated for functional recovery, muscle atrophy, nerve morphology, and gene expression profile.

Materials and Methods

Animals

The experimental design and animal protocol was approved by the University Committee on Animal Research (UCAR) at the University of Rochester (UCAR-2009-019) on March 31, 2017 and the experiments were performed according to the guidelines of UCAR. A total of 193 ten-week-old female C57BL/6J mice (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) weighing 20–25 g were used in this study and mice were housed at the animal facility according to UCAR guidelines. We used female mice because they are easier to house together even after surgery than male mice and female mice have a much lower risk of fighting or mutilating wounds – which is a key reason for early post-surgical demise in mice (Tseng et al., 2016; Clark et al., 2019; Yue et al., 2019).

Pharmacokinetics of 4-AP

Since clinically relevant serum concentrations of 4-AP are in the range of 0.5–1 μM (Shi and Blight, 1997; Smith et al., 2000), it was necessary to measure 4-AP concentration in the mouse serum. To determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of 4-AP (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 20 μg 4-AP was administered directly into the stomach of awake mouse through oral gavage or 10 μg 4-AP was injected intraperitoneally (IP). Whole blood samples were collected in clean microcentrifuge tubes without anticoagulants at specified time points by cardiac puncture and kept at room temperature for 1 hour. The blood samples were collected after 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes of oral 4-AP administrations and after 10, 20, 40, 60, and 120 minutes of IP 4-AP administrations. Serum was separated after centrifugation of the clotted blood sample at 1000 × g for 10 minutes and stored in –20°C until use. For the removal of serum protein, 150 μL of acetonitrile was added to 50 μL of serum, vortexed for 1 minute, and then centrifuged at 3000 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C.

The relevant concentration of 4-AP in the serum following a single oral or IP administration was determined by a modified liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) assay (Caggiano and Blight, 2013; Burnett et al., 2015). This method simultaneously determined 4-AP and 3,4-diaminopyridine (3,4-DAP; Sigma-Aldrich) (as an internal control) in the mouse serum with a chromatographic run time of 3.5 minutes. Briefly, the supernatant layer was filtered through 0.2 μm syringe filter (Millex-FG, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) and 10 μL of the solution was analyzed with LC/MS/MS. Liquid chromatography separation was performed isocratically at 800 μL/min on the Waters Atlantis HILIC column at 25°C. The mobile phase was 5 mM ammonium acetate in 10/90/0.2 (v/v/v) water/acetonitrile/formic acid. The mass spectrometry consisted of a Thermo Quantum Access Max Triple Quadrupole (GenTech Scientific, Arcade, NY, USA). The ion spray voltage was set at 4500 V with the source temperature at 500°C. The sheath gas pressure and auxiliary gas pressure were set at 65 psi (pounds per square inch) and 5 psi respectively. LC/MS/MS analysis was carried out with argon as the collision gas. Ion transitions were 95/78 for 4-AP and 110/93 for 3,4-DAP. 4-AP was quantified with a calibration curve (0.01–20 μM), and was qualitatively assessed by comparison of analytical response for 4-AP with that of the internal standard, 3,4-DAP. The within-day and between-day precision was established by assaying quality control samples prepared at 0.01 μM (lower limit quantitation) and at 10 μM (higher limit quantitation) for three analyses with error within 15%.

Sciatic nerve crush and denervation injuries, 4-AP treatment, and tissue harvesting

Sciatic nerve crush injury was performed as previously described (Elfar et al., 2008; Yue et al., 2019). Briefly, after IP ketamine (60 mg/kg)/xylazine (4 mg/kg) (McKesson, Irving, TX, USA) anesthesia, hair clipping and aseptic animal preparation, a lateral skin incision along the length of the femur was made, and right sciatic nerve was bluntly exposed through the iliotibial band and crushed proximal to the tibial and peroneal divisions using a smooth forceps with a metal calibration ring to standardize pressure for 30 seconds. For permanent denervation (complete transection or cut) injury, a 10 mm segment of the sciatic nerve was removed and the proximal stump was buried in the gluteal muscle to prevent any re-innervation. The wound was closed and subcutaneous buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg) was given for postoperative analgesia immediately after surgery and every 12 hours thereafter for the next 3 days.

For the acute single-dose diagnostic effect of oral 4-AP at 3 days post-injury, sciatic function index (SFI) was measured before and 30 minutes after the single dose of 4-AP (10 μg/mouse) oral gavage. For the chronic effect of 4-AP treatment, a daily dose of 10 μg 4-AP consisted of oral gavage (control: water) or IP injection (control: saline) immediately after injuries and continued until sacrifice. Before each day’s 4-AP dose, mice were subjected to gait analysis. For the chronic 4-AP treatment groups, mice with crush injury were sacrificed at 14 days post-injury and mice with denervation injury were sacrificed at 28 days post-injury.

Unless otherwise mentioned, mice were given IP injection ketamine (60 mg/kg)/xylazine (4 mg/kg) mixture on the sacrifice day and blood samples, nerves, and muscles were then collected/harvested under deep anesthesia. Tibialis anterior (TA), extensor digitorum longus (EDL), and gastrocnemius-soleus muscles were harvested for in vitro and ex vivo studies.

SFI

The effects of transdermal 4-AP were evaluated by SFI, a noninvasive means to determine the direct in vivo functional recovery after sciatic nerve injury (Inserra et al., 1998; Varejao et al., 2001; Elfar et al., 2008). The SFI is measured on a scale of 0 (normal) to 100 (complete loss of function). Briefly, mice were trained to walk freely along a 77 cm by 7 cm corridor lined with white paper and individual footprints were obtained by painting each hind foot. Paw prints were measured, using two blinded evaluators, for toe spread (distance from the 1st toe to the 5th toe) and paw length (length from the third toe to bottom of the print). Three prints from the experimental (injured) and normal (uninjured) sides were measured, and SFI was calculated for each animal by averaging these measurements and using the following formula (Inserra et al., 1998): SFI = 118.9 ((ETS–NTS)/NTS) – 51.2 ((EPL–NPL)/NPL) – 7.5. Where E is the experimental (injured: crush or denervated) paw, N is the normal (healthy: uninjured or control) paw, TS is toe spread, and PL is paw length. To make sure a successful crush injury, mouse with SFI lower than 80 at 1 day post-injury mice were excluded from the study.

Ex vivo muscle contraction measurement

Isolated right EDL muscle contraction was measured using an ASI muscle contraction system (Aurora Scientific, Aurora, Canada) as previously described (Liu et al., 2015; Yue et al., 2019). Briefly, EDL muscles were carefully excised and mounted between two platinum electrodes and continuously perfused with oxygenated Ringer solution in the chamber. Muscle optimal length (L0) was determined using a 1 Hz stimulation series. Stimulus output was set at 120% of the voltage that elicited maximal force. Muscles were first equilibrated using three 500 ms, 150 Hz tetani at 1 minute intervals and then subjected to a force frequency. Maximum muscle contractile force was measured at stimulation frequencies ranging from 25 to 250 Hz. To obtain specific force values, absolute force was normalized to muscle cross-sectional area determined by EDL weight and length (Hakim et al., 2011).

Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction

Sciatic nerves were harvested from the injured site to the tibial and peroneal division and were homogenized in TRIzol. The RNA was purified using RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacture’s protocol and total RNA concentration was measured by NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg RNA using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). To detect the expressed genes of the nerve injury, a trauma nervous system mouse 96 well-plate (Bio-Rad) was used. The list of genes and detailed information primers used are in Additional Table 1. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reactions were performed using PerfeCTa SYBR Green Fast Mix (Quantabio, Beverly, MA, USA) in a CFX96 real-time PCR machine (Bio-rad). Changes in gene expression of nerve injury were normalized to GAPDH and the uninjured, water-treated group. Results were considered significant when genes showed at least 2-fold differential expression levels and P value was < 0.05 between groups.

Additional Table 1.

Primers used in real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction

Gene Name Gene Symbol RefSeq Accession No. Amplicon Context Sequence (5'-3') Amplicon Length (base pair)
Complement component 1, q subcomponent, alpha polypeptide C1qa NC_000070.6,NT_187033.1 CACTTGGAGATCACTTGGAAGTTGAAGTAATAGAAGCCGGGCACTGCACAGATGAAGCGACCCGTGTGGTTCTGGTATGGACTCTCCTGGT 92
complement component 1, q subcomponent, B chain C1qb NC_000001.10,NG_007283.1, NT_004610.19 CAGCAACGCTCACTCTACCCCCAACACCACCCCTTGCCCAACCAATGCACACAGTAGGGCTTGGTGAATGCTGCTGAGTGAAT 83
Catalase Cat NC_000068.7,NT_039207.8 AAGATCTCGGAGGCCATAATCCGGATCTTCCTGAGCAAGCCTTCCTGCCTCTCCAACAGGCAAGTTTTTGATGCCCTGGTCGGTCTTGTAATGGAACTTGCAATAGACTGCCT 113
CD53 antigen Cd53 NC_000069.6,NT_039240.8 CAATCTGGCAGTTGAGTGTCAGTGCAAAGGACATTCCCAGCACCTGTATCACACATACACAGATGGTAATGATTCCA 77
F-box protein 32 Fbxo32 NC_000081.6,NT_039621.8 GCATGATGTTCAGTTGTAAGCACACAGGCAGGTCGGTGATCGTGAGGCCTTTGAAGGCAGGCCTGCTGATCTGGATGCTATTCAGC 86
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase Gapdh NC_000072.6,NT_039353.8 AACCTGGTCCTCAGTGTAGCCCAAGATGCCCTTCAGTGGGCCCTCAGATGCCTGCTTCACCACCTTCTTGATGTC 75
Hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase Hprt NC_000086.7,NT_187037.1 TTATCAGACTGAAGAGCTACTGTAATGATCAGTCAACGGGGGACATAAAAGTTATTGGTGGAGATGATCT 70
Interleukin 1 beta Il1b NC_000068.7,NT_039207.8 TTGTCGTTGCTTGGTTCTCCTTGTACAAAGCTCATGGAGAATATCACTGGAGAAAGGAGAGGAGTCTTGTTGGTTGATATTCTGTCCATTGAGGT 95
Lectin, galactose binding, soluble 3 Lgals3 NC_000080.6,NT_039606.8 AACACGAAGCAGGACAATAACTGGGGAAAGGAAGAAAGACAGTCAGCCTTCCCCTTTGAGAGTGGCAAACCATTCAAAATACAAGTCCTGGTTGAAGC 98
mitogen-activated protein kinase 6 MAPK6 NC_000015.9,NT_010194.17 TCTCGATGAGTCGGAGAAGTCCCGTTGTATCAGAGTAAGATGGACGGTAGCTTTGATTGTGATTGTGGTGAGCT 74
Metallothionein 1 Mt1 NC_000074.6,NT_078575.7 CAGCGTCTTCCTATACAGTTCCACCCTGTTTACTAAACCCCCGTTTTCTACCGAGTACGTGAATAATAA 69
Metallothionein 2 Mt2 NC_000074.6,NT_078575.7 CAATACTCTCCGCTATAAAGGTCGCGCTCCGCGTGCTTCTCTCCATCACGCTCCTAGAACTCTTCAAACCGATCTCTCGTCGAT 84
Metallothionein 3 Mt3 NC_000074.6,NT_078575.7 TGTGTGCAAAGGTGAAGAGGGGGCCAAGGCAGAGGCCGAGAAATGCAGCTGCTGCCAGTGAGGACCCAGACCCTCCCACACAGCCTATGTAAATAGTGCTGGGTGTCCCTGGTGGGGCA CAACTGTTGTCTTCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCGCCGGCTGCCTGCTCCGGGGTGTGAATAAATCCCATGCACAAC 194
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase family, member 1 Parp1 NC_000067.6,NT_039185.8 CCGGCCATCAAGAATGAAGGAAAGAGAAAAGGTGACGAGGTGGATGGAACAGATGAAGTGGCCAAAAAGAAATCTAAGAAAGGGAAGGACAAGGATAGTAGTAAGCTGGAGAAGGC 116
Sodium channel, voltage-gated, type X, alpha Scn10a NC_000075.6,NT_039482.8 TGAGCTAAGGATCGCAGAAAACAACAGACTAGAAATGGACAGAATCACCACAATGAAGTCGAACACATTCCAGCCGTTGGTGAAGTAATACTGCCG 96
Sodium channel, voltage-gated, type II, alpha 1 Scn2a1 NC_000068.7, NT_039207.8 CAGCAGTGAATCAGATATGGAAGAAAGCAAGGAGAAATTGAATGCAACTAGTTCATCTGAAGGCAGTAC 69
Sodium channel, voltage-gated, type IX, alpha Scn9a NC_000068.7, NT_039207.8 CGGTGTCTTCTTCAATTGCTGTAAGATTGTCAGAACTAAAGGAACTCAGTAATAAAGCCAGAAACAGGTTCAGGACCACAAGGTTCCCAATCACCATGACCATCAT 106
Secretory leukocyte peptidase inhibitor Slpi NC_000068.7, NT_039207.8 GCGAATGGGAACAGGATTCACGCACTTGGAACCGCAAGCATCTTGGCAGCACCTCTGCTTTCCCGGGCACTCCCAGTCAGTACGGCATTGTGGCTTCTCAAGCTTAAGGCACT 113
MAD homolog 7 (Drosophila) Smad7 NC_000084.6, NT_039674.8 AAGTCAAGAGGCTGTGTTGCTGTGAATCTTACGGGAAGATCAACCCCGAGCTGGTGTGCTGCAACCCCCATCACCTTAGTCGACTCTGTGAACTAGATTCCCAACTTCTTCTGGAGCCTG 120
Superoxide dismutase 1, soluble Sod1 NC_000082.6, NT_039625. GTCGGCTTCTCGTCTTGCTCTCTCTGGTCCCTCCGGAGGAGGCCGCCGCGCGTCTCCCGGGGAAGCATGGCGATGAAAGCGGTGTGCGTGCTGAAGGGCGACGGTCCGGTGCAGGGAACCATCCACTTCGAGCAGAAGGCAAGCGGTGAACCAGTTGTGTTGTCAG 166
TATA box binding protein Tbp NC_000083.6, NT_039649.8 GGAGAATCATGGACCAGAACAACAGCCTTCCACCTTATGCTCAGGGCTTGGCCTCCCCACAGGGCGCCATGACTCCTGGAATTCCCATCTTTAGTCCAATGA 102
Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 Timp1 NC_000086.7, NT_039700.8 GGCATCCTCTTGTTGCTATCACTGATAGCTTCCAGTAAGGCCTGTAGCTGTGCCCCACCCCACCCACAGACAGCCTTCTGCAACTCGGACCTGGTCATAAGGGCTAAATTCATGGGTTCCCC AGAAATCAACGAGACCACCTTATACCA 149
Tumor necrosis factor Tnf NC_000083.6, NT_039649.8, NT_039662.3, NT_187004.1, NT_187027.1 ATGAGAAGAGGCTGAGACATAGGCACCGCCTGGAGTTCTGGAAGCCCCCCATCTTTTGGGGGAGTGCCTCTTCTGCCAGTTCCACGTCGCGGATCATGCTTTCTGTGCTCATGGTGTCT 119
Tubulin, beta 3 class III Tubb3 NC_000074.6, NT_078575.7 TCTCTAGCCGCGTGAAGTCAGCATGAGGGAGATCGTGCACATCCAGGCCGGCCAGTGCGGCAACCAGATAGGGGCCAAGTTCTGGGAGGTCATCAGCGATGAGCACGGCATAGAC 115
Tubulin, beta 4A class IVA Tubb4a NC_000083.6, NT_039649.8 GACGGCATCCACTAACTCCGCGCCCTCGGTGTAGTGACCCTTGGCCCAGTTGTTGCCTGCTCCGGATTGACCAAATACAAAGTTGTCTGGCC 92

Transmission electron microscopy and morphometric analysis

The crushed portion of sciatic nerves were excised and fixed for 24 hours in a combination fixative of 2.5% glutaraldehyde/4.0% paraformaldehyde buffered in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate and post-fixed 1.5 hours in buffered 2.0% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol up to 100%, then transitioned into propylene oxide, and EPON/Araldite epoxy resin overnight. The next day, the nerves were embedded in fresh epoxy resin and polymerized for 2 days at 60°C. One micron sections were cut and stained with toluidine blue to assess the myelin before thin sectioning at 70 nm using an ultramicrotome and diamond knife. These sections were placed onto formvar/carbon slot grids, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and digitally imaged using a Hitachi 7650 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) with an attached Gatan Erlangshen digital camera (Gatan, Inc., Warrington, PA, USA) at 3000× magnification. The sections and images were randomly selected by staffs in Transmission Electron Microscopy Core. Images were analyzed using ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). Three images from each mouse were analyzed, containing a total of approximately 20–40 axons per animal. The area and inner and outer perimeter of axons were measured with diameters calculated from these measurements and myelin thicknesses were calculated by the difference between these measurements. G-ratio was calculated by the ratio of the inner axonal diameter to the outer diameter.

Statistical analysis

All data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). One-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis of the serum concentration-time data was performed using PKSolver (version 2.0, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China) to determine a complete pharmacokinetic profile. Data were analyzed using either two-tailed Student’s t-test for paired data from the same experiment or unpaired data from different experiments. SFI time-course and muscle force data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance followed by post hoc T tests using Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Acute SFI, muscle weight, axon morphology, and PCR array data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance followed by post hoc T test using Tukey correction for multiple comparisons, after confirmation of normally distributed data sets. Values of P < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Pharmacokinetics of oral and IP administration of 4-AP

Our results confirmed the straightforward sample preparations with small sample volume requirements for this assay, and this method proved useful for determining a pharmacokinetic profile of 4-AP with the dosage utilized. Figure 1A and B show the serum 4-AP concentration versus time profile for 20 μg oral 4-AP (n = 4–5 mice/time point) and 10 μg IP 4-AP (n = 3–4 mice/time point) administrations, respectively. In the oral 4-AP experiment (Figure 1A), the time to maximum blood concentration (Tmax) was 30 minutes and the predicted maximum concentration (Cmax) of 4-AP was 1.48 ± 0.09 μM. The mean residence time that 4-AP stayed in mice was 61.2 ± 1.74 minutes. In the IP 4-AP experiment (Figure 1B), Tmax was 15.5 ± 3.41 minutes, the predicted Cmax of 4-AP was 0.98 ± 0.07 μM, and mean residence time was 32.8 ± 3.17 minutes. Because serum 4-AP levels with oral 20 μg 4-AP were higher than reported in clinical use, we used 10 μg 4-AP for both oral and IP experiments for identical experiments. Selected pharmacokinetic parameters after oral and IP administration of 4-AP are shown in Additional Table 2.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Serum concentrations of 4-AP from LC/MS/MS analysis.

(A) The time-course of serum 4-AP concentrations following oral 4-AP (20 μg) administration (n = 4–5 mice/time point). (B) The time-course of serum 4-AP concentrations following intraperitoneal 4-AP (10 μg) administration (n = 3–4 mice/time point). 4-AP: 4-Aminopyridine; LC/MS/MS: liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry.

Additional Table 2.

Selected pharmacokinetic parameters after oral or intraperitoneal 4-AP administration

Parameter Oral 20 μg IP 10 μg
Tmax (min) 30.0 ± 0.0 15.51 ± 3.41
Cmax (μM) 1.48 ± 0.09 0.98 ± 0.07
AUC (μM•min) 90.77 ± 5.99 43.39 ± 5.93
MRT (min) 61.20 ± 1.74 32.76 ± 3.17

Data presented as the mean ± SEM from 3-4 mice (IP) and 4-5 mice (oral) at each time point. 4-AP: 4-Aminopyridine; AUC: area under the plasma concentration time curve; Cmax: predicted maximum concentration; IP: intraperitoneal; MRT: mean residence time; Tmax: time to maximum blood concentration.

Oral 4-AP treatment differentiates crush injury from denervation injury, and promotes in vivo functional recovery after sciatic nerve crush injury

Figure 2 shows the functional evaluation of nerve injury and recovery using SFI at different experimental conditions. Acute single dose of oral 4-AP (Figure 2A) at 3 days post-injury significantly improved SFI in crushed nerves within 30 minutes of administration from –96 ± 5.62 to –66 ± 4.27 (P < 0.001, n = 9 mice/group). In contrast, this effect was absent in mice with nerve denervation (SFI, –107 ± 3.68 vs. –100 ± 1.84; P = 0.095, n = 10 mice/group). This immediate improvement of gait function indicated that 4-AP can distinctly differentiate an incomplete nerve injury from a complete nerve injury. Furthermore, once-daily oral 4-AP (10 μg) markedly accelerated the functional recovery (SFI) early on from crush injury as compared with water (Figure 2B) leading to demonstrable significant improvement by 3 days post-injury (water: 67 ± 7.24 vs. 4-AP: 29 ± 9.31; P < 0.01, n = 9 mice/group). By the 2-week time point, SFI reached recovery levels in both groups. In contrast, there was no functional recovery following denervation injury (Figure 2C) and SFI was identical in both water and 4-AP groups even after 28 days of treatment (n = 5 mice/group). These results demonstrate that, in addition to acute diagnostic effect on motor function, daily oral 4-AP is effective in enhancing the long-term functional recovery of sciatic nerve crush injury. We also checked the effect of IP 4-AP treatment on the functional recovery following crush and denervation injuries (Additional Figure 1 (411KB, tif) ). Consistent with the findings of oral 4-AP, IP 4-AP also significantly improved SFI following crush injury at day 3 and day 7 (P < 0.05; n = 5–6 mice/group), but this beneficial effect was absent in mice with denervation injury (n = 5 mice/group) as reported in our previous work (Tseng et al., 2016).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of oral 4-AP (10 μg) administration on the motor functional recovery following sciatic nerve crush or denervation injury.

(A) SFI after 30 minutes of acute oral 4-AP administration at 3 days post-injury, each symbol represents individual mouse (crush: n = 9, ***P < 0.001; denervation: n = 10 mice, P = 0.095). (B) Time-course for the post-injury SFI recovery after crush injury with daily oral 4-AP (10 μg) treatment (n = 5–6 mice/group; **P < 0.01, vs. 4-AP). (C) Time-course for the post-injury SFI recovery after denervation injury with daily oral 4-AP (10 μg) treatment (n = 5 mice/group). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. 4-AP: 4-Aminopyridine; SFI: sciatic function index.

Oral 4-AP treatment attenuates muscle weight loss following crush injury

Figure 3 shows TA and EDL muscle mass (mg) in contralateral uninjured limbs (uninjured) and injured limbs (crush or denervation) with or without 4-AP treatment at 14 days post-injury. Uninjured, untreated mean TA or EDL muscle mass (mg) was not different from uninjured 4-AP treated counterparts in both crush and denervation groups. Uninjured untreated vs. uninjured 4-AP treated TA muscle mass in crush and denervation group was 39.1 ± 0.93 vs. 37.8 ± 0.37 (n = 6 mice/group) and 42.4 ± 0.72 vs. 39.6 ± 0.98 (n = 6 mice/group), respectively. Uninjured untreated vs. uninjured 4-AP treated EDL muscle mass in crush and denervation group was 8.8 ± 0.27 vs. 9.6 ± 0.28 (n = 5 mice/group) and 10.1 ± 0.86 vs. 9.5 ± 0.20 (n = 5 mice/group), respectively. Both crush (Figures 3A and B) and denervation (Figures 3C and D) injuries caused a significant loss of TA and EDL muscle mass in the injured limbs compared with respective contralateral uninjured limbs. Daily oral 4-AP treatment significantly prevented muscle loss in crush injury but not in denervation injury. On day 14, mean TA and EDL muscle mass (mg) in crush water vs. crush 4-AP group was 29.2 ± 0.97 vs. 33.1 ± 0.92 (P < 0.05; n = 6 mice/group) and 7.6 ± 0.32 vs. 9.0 ± 0.39 (P < 0.05; n = 6 mice/group), respectively, showing a significant protection against muscle loss in the injured limb early on. In contrast, this muscle protective effect of oral 4-AP was absent in denervation group, and mean TA and EDL muscle mass (mg) at 14 days post-injury in denervated water-treated vs. 4-AP treated groups was 26.9 ± 0.96 vs. 25.7 ± 0.45 (n = 5 mice/group) and 7.0 ± 0.20 vs. 7.2 ± 0.28 (n = 5 mice/group), respectively.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effect of daily oral administration of 10 μg 4-AP or water on the muscle mass on day 14 following crush or denervation injury.

(A) TA muscle weight and (B) EDL muscle weight following crush injury (n = 6/group, *P < 0.05). (C) TA muscle weight and (D) EDL muscle weight following denervation injury (n = 5 mice/group, *P < 0.05). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. 4-AP: 4-Aminopyridine; EDL: extensor digitorum longus; TA: tibialis anterior.

Oral 4-AP treatment improves ex vivo muscle force following crush injury

Figure 4 shows the effect of daily 4-AP treatment on the EDL muscle specific force and force frequency relationship at 14 days post-injury. In the crush injury group (Figure 4A), daily 4-AP treatment significantly improved the specific force (mN/mm2) of EDL muscles compared with the water-treated group and the maximal force at 250 Hz was 174.1 ± 8.4 vs. 136.2 ± 13.3 (P < 0.05, n = 5–6 mice/group). In contrast, the muscle force enhancing effect of 4-AP treatment was absent in the denervated EDL muscle, and the mean muscle force at 14 days post-injury was comparable between water and 4-AP groups at all frequencies (Figure 4B; n = 4–5 mice/group). We also checked the effect of daily IP 4-AP treatments on muscle force (Additional Figure 2 (493.6KB, tif) ). Similar to the findings with oral 4-AP treatment, ex vivo EDL muscle force was significantly enhanced in crush injury IP-treated 4-AP animals compared with the crush injury saline-treated group, and the maximal force at 175 Hz was 225.9 ± 12.6 vs. 119.0 ± 36.5 (P < 0.05, n = 4 mice/group). The muscle force enhancing effect of daily IP 4-AP treatment was absent in the denervated EDL muscles and the muscle force was comparable between IP 4-AP and water-treated groups (n = 3–4 mice/group). In the sham surgery group, the specific muscle force was identical between water and IP 4-AP groups at all frequencies (n = 3 mice/group).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effect of daily oral 4-AP (10 μg) treatment on the ex vivo contractile function in EDL muscles on day 14 following crush or denervation injury.

Mean specific force in EDL muscles of water-treated (open circles) and 4-AP-treated (closed circles) animals. (A) Force frequency relationship of EDL muscles isolated from the injured limbs of sciatic nerve crush injury (n = 5–6 mice/group, *P < 0.05, vs. water group). (B) Force frequency relationship of EDL muscles isolated from the injured limbs of sciatic nerve denervation injury (n = 4–5 mice/group). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. 4-AP: 4-Aminopyridine; EDL: extensor digitorum longus.

Oral 4-AP treatment decreases G-ratio and improves myelination of the sciatic nerve after crush injury

Figure 5 shows representative transmission electron microscopy images, mean G-ratio and myelin thickness of contralateral uninjured and injured (crushed) nerves with or without oral 4-AP treatment at 14 days post-injury. Figure 5A demonstrates an increased representation of well-preserved axons in the crush 4-AP-treated group as compared with the crush water group. While axonal myelin thickness in the uninjured nerves was similar between water and oral 4-AP groups (Figure 5B), it was significantly increased in crushed nerves 4-AP group compared with water-treated group (0.84 ± 0.04 vs. 0.66 ± 0.04, P < 0.05, n = 6 mice/group). Consistent with these findings, we also observed small but significant reductions in G-ratio in crush 4-AP group compared with crush water group (0.69 ± 0.01 vs. 0.73 ± 0.01, P < 0.05, n = 6 mice/group). The uninjured nerve G-ratio was comparable between water and 4-AP groups (Figure 5C; n = 6 mice/group).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

TEM analysis of transverse sections of sciatic nerves within the crush injury site at 14 days post-injury for the effect of oral 4-AP (10 μg) and vehicle (water) treatments on nerve myelination and G-ratio.

(A) Representative TEM images of axon morphology from water- and 4-AP-treated mice (original magnification, 8000×; scale bar: 2 μm). (B) Myelin thickness (μm) and (C) G-ratio of the axons. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM; n = 6 mice/group; *P < 0.05. 4-AP: 4-Aminopyridine; TEM: transmission electron microscopy.

Gene expression profile in the crushed sciatic nerve and effect of 4-AP

Figure 6 depicts heat map for the quantitative real-time PCR array analysis of gene expression in the crushed sciatic nerves at 3 days post-injury (n = 6 mice/group). The frequency of differentially expressed genes in mouse sciatic nerve was identified by a trauma nervous system 96-well panel. PCR array analysis (Figure 6) revealed significant (P < 0.05) alterations in the level of several high-expressing and low-expressing genes after crush injury. Crush injury in water group caused significant up-regulation of IL1b, Timp1, Cd53, Lagals3, slpi, and Tnf genes and significant down-regulation of Sod1 and Cat genes compared to the uninjured-water group. Interestingly, 4-AP treatment alone significantly induced an up-regulation of Parp1, Mt1, Scn10a, Sod1, Scn9a, and Cat genes in uninjured nerves compared to the uninjured-water group. Compared to the uninjured-4-AP group, while we observed a significant up-regulation of Lgals3, C1qb, slpi, and C1qa genes in the injured nerves with 4-AP treatment, there was a significant down-regulation of Mt1, Sod1 and Cat genes. Compared to the crush injury-water group, IL1b gene was significantly down-regulated and Lgals3, Parp1, Scn10a, and Scn9a genes were significantly up-regulated in the crush inury-4-AP group. Of note, although it was not significantly different, Sod1 and Cat genes in the crush injury-4-AP group was ≥ 2-fold higher than the crush injury-water group.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Heat map for quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction array data for gene expression profile in the injured (crush injury) and uninjured nerves at 3 days post-injury with or without daily oral 4-AP (10 μg) treatment.

Data are presented as the mean ± SEM; n = 6 mice/group; *P < 0.05, uninjured-water vs. crush injury-water group; #P < 0.05, uninjured-4-AP vs. crush injury-4-AP group; ζP < 0.05, uninjured-water vs. uninjured-4-AP group; ¥P < 0.05, crush injury-water vs. crush injury-4-AP group. 4-AP: 4-Aminopyridine.

Discussion

The main finding of the present study is that orally administered human equivalent dosage of 4-AP improves both neuronal function and muscle atrophy in a rodent model of TPNI. We further confirm two distinct and important properties of oral 4-AP in TPNI: acute single-dose efficacy test and long-term therapeutic effects. Acute single-dose efficacy test with oral 4-AP temporarily elicited a significant improvement in the global motor function of the affected limb with crushed nerve but not in the limb with transected nerve, allowing the differentiation of these two clinically indistinguishable injuries at an early time point. Long-term therapeutic benefit with daily oral administration of 4-AP was demonstrated by improved global motor function recovery, nerve myelination, muscle atrophy, and ex vivo muscle force in limbs with crushed nerves but not in limbs with complete and permanent nerve discontinuity. In addition, PCR array revealed that crush injury caused distinct up-regulation of several high-expressing and down-regulation of low-expressing genes in the injured nerve and 4-AP had significant modulatory effects on different genes in the uninjured and injured nerves. These findings provide new insights into the potential clinical use of 4-AP in TPNIs especially where an early differentiation of an injured nerve with or without axonal continuity is critical for surgical decision making surrounding the immediate need for surgical repair of nerves which are completely severed.

Traumatic peripheral nerve injuries occur along a spectrum from injuries in which some axonal continuity is maintained with demyelination (crush or compression injuries) all the way up to injuries involving complete nerve transection. Following an injury that causes demyelination, voltage-gated potassium channels are exposed and subsequent potassium leakage blocks action potential propagation causing conduction failure (Blight, 1989; Nashmi and Fehlings, 2001). 4-AP is clinically used in diverse chronic demyelinating disorders because it can enhance nerve excitability by restoring conduction in demyelinated axons via potassium channel blockade. In this study, with human equivalent oral dosage, we demonstrated that 4-AP can distinctly classify a crush injury from a transection injury by supporting transient motor function recovery – an effect most likely related to nerve conduction restoration, because the time course was too rapid to be explained by an axonal regeneration. In addition to the nerve injury differentiating property, continuous daily oral 4-AP administration also promoted global limb functional improvement which was associated with improved nerve morphology and myelination (increased myelin thickness and decreased G-ratio). All of these findings are consistent with our previous studies, where chronic 4-AP treatment significantly improved motor function and nerve conduction with thicker myelin sheaths (Tseng et al., 2016; Clark et al., 2019; Mordak et al., 2019). It is apparent that improved nerve conduction and a faster communication with innervating muscle are intimately involved in 4-AP-mediated beneficial effects. Regardless of the route of administrations (oral, IP, local or transdermal), the acute single-dose efficacy in nerve injury differentiation and late long-term therapeutic benefits with 4-AP thus provide robust pre-clinical evidence for its potential use in peripheral nerve injury clinical trials.

While innervation of skeletal muscle is essential for the maintenance of muscle size, structure, and contractile function (Moresi et al., 2010), denervation results in contractile deficits and rapid muscle-fiber atrophy within the first 2 weeks post-injury (Engel and Stonnington, 1974; Day et al., 2001; Lien et al., 2008). Recently, we demonstrated that daily IP 4-AP (10 μg) treatment significantly attenuates muscle atrophy of the injured limb with increased regenerating muscle fibers and improves ex vivo intrinsic contractile force of muscle. Muscle wet weight is widely used to evaluate muscle innervation after nerve injury (Sobotka and Mu, 2015). In this study, daily oral 4-AP treatment also significantly attenuated post-injury muscle loss and improved ex vivo muscle force following crush injury but not following nerve transection, further demonstrating a musculo-protective role of 4-AP against neurogenic muscle atrophy through a mechanism that may depend on nerve continuity.

Despite extensive researches with TPNIs, the molecular mechanisms of nerve regeneration are still unclear, and currently no therapeutic options exist that can promote nerve regeneration and enhance functional recovery. Recently we demonstrated that 4-AP treatment can regulate several muscle atrophy genes to attenuate neurogenic muscle atrophy (Yue et al., 2019). Although we identified several genes in the crushed nerve with different functional categories, it is beyond the scope of this study to discuss all genes. Moreover, there is a large group of genes with unknown function that need further investigation. Our interest was mainly focused on genes involved inflammatory and immune responses, cell differentiation, nerve damage and regeneration, and antioxidant function. Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine encoded by IL1b gene. Schwann cells and macrophages in the injured nerve express IL-1β (Terenghi, 1999), and IL-1β can induce the production of toxic mediators, and promote inflammation and cell death (Dubovy et al., 2013). However, it is also reported that increased IL-1β could be detrimental or beneficial to nerve regeneration and functional recovery depending on the timing and degree of inflammation (Guenard et al., 1991; Wyss-Coray and Mucke, 2002; Temporin et al., 2008; Dubovy et al., 2013). IL1b gene was significantly down-regulated by 4-AP treatment in the crushed nerves compared to crush injury-water group. Tumor necrosis factor is a pro-inflammatory cytokine and it is encoded by Tnf gene. Tnf gene was significantly increased only in crush injury-water group. This finding is consistent with increased tumor necrosis factor protein expression within 3 days of sciatic nerve crush injury in mice and rats (George et al., 2004, 2005). Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 is a glycoprotein encoded by Timp1 gene. We observed significantly increased Timp1 gene expression only in crush injury-water group. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases is an endogenous inhibitor of the matrix metalloproteinases and it is reported to play an important role in the differentiation and function of myelin-forming Schwann cells in nerve regeneration (Kim et al., 2012). Galectin is an endogenous glycoprotein encoded by Lgals gene. Galectin-1 is present in both central and peripheral nervous system (Hynes et al., 1990) and promotes axonal regeneration and recovery of locomotor activity after spinal cord injury (Quinta et al., 2014). It is also demonstrated that galectin-1 is expressed in regenerating sciatic nerves and plays an important role in the initiation of axonal growth after nerve injury (Horie et al., 1999; Horie and Kadoya, 2000). We observed significantly increased expression of Lgals3 gene in the crushed nerves and 4-AP treatment further increased this expression compared to crush injury-water group. Ploy(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 is a nuclear protein that acts at the center of cellular stress (Kauppinen, 2007; Sriram et al., 2015) and it is encoded by Parp1 gene. Ploy(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1’s primary function is to repair DNA and it has been implicated in many neurological diseases. Oxidative stress causes DNA damage and ploy(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 activation is associated with DNA repair, cell death and inflammation (Sriram et al., 2014). We observed that 4-AP treatment alone significantly increased Parp1 gene in uninjured-4-AP group compared to uninjured-water group and there was no further increase in Parp1 gene in crush injury-4-AP group. Parp1 level in crush injury-4-AP group remained significantly elevated compared to crush injury-water group. Oxidative stress is one of the main causes of nerve damage after injury (Lanza et al., 2012). Antioxidant enzymes Cu, Zn-superoxide dismutase and catalase are encoded by Sod1 and Cat genes, respectively. Crushed nerves in water group had significantly down-regulated anti-oxidative Sod1 and Cat genes compared to uninjured-water group. In contrast, 4-AP treatment induced an up-regulation of Sod1 and Cat genes in the uninjured nerve and it also modestly attenuated their down-regulation in crushed nerves compared to crush injury-water group. In animal models, Cu, Zn-superoxide dismutase and catalase are well reported to play an important role in peripheral nerve injury and regeneration (Varija et al., 2009; Fisher et al., 2012; Lanza et al., 2012). While the exact impact of these different genes on TPNI requires further investigations, these differentially regulated genes with crush injury and 4-AP suggest that these genes have functional significance in nerve degeneration and/or repair. Our findings with improved nerve morphology and post-injury functional recovery at least indicate that 4-AP may play an important immunomodulatory role in limiting post-injury inflammatory processes (Chandy et al., 1984; Espejo and Montalban, 2012).

Consistent with pharmacologic trials (Uges et al., 1982; Davis et al., 1990; Blight and Henney, 2009) and our recent study (Clark et al., 2019), we observed linear pharmacokinetics with oral and IP 4-AP where the peak serum concentrations were clearly dose dependent and the beneficial effects on the post nerve injury recovery were without side effects. Oral 4-AP both at single and daily doses conforms to our earlier pre-clinical findings with IP (Noble et al., 2019; Yue et al., 2019), transdermal (Clark et al., 2019) and/or local administration of 4-AP (Tseng et al., 2016). Taken together, we provide consistent and convincing pre-clinical evidence that 4-AP has the potential to be used in the clinic as an acute single-dose efficacy tool to differentiate TPNI patients with or without continuity, and chronically to treat TPNI patients with nerve continuity for accelerated recovery.

Additional files

Additional Figure 1 (411KB, tif) : Effect of daily intraperitoneal 4-AP (10 μg) treatment on the motor functional recovery after sciatic nerve crush or denervation injury.

Additional Figure 1

Effect of daily intraperitoneal 4-AP (10 µg) treatment on the motor functional recovery after sciatic nerve crush or denervation injury.

(A) Time-course for the post-injury SFI recovery after crush injury (n = 5-6 mice/group; *P < 0.05, vs. respective 4-AP). (B) Time-course for the post-injury SFI recovery after denervation injury (n = 5 mice/group). Data presented as the mean ± SEM. 4-AP: 4-Aminopyridine; SFI: sciatic function index.

NRR-15-2098_Suppl1.tif (411KB, tif)

Additional Figure 2 (493.6KB, tif) : Effect of daily intraperitoneal 4-AP (10 μg) treatment on the ex vivo contractile function in EDL muscles at 14 days following crush or denervation injury or sham surgery.

Additional Figure 2

Effect of daily intraperitoneal 4-AP (10 µg) treatment on the ex vivo contractile function in EDL muscles at 14 days following crush or denervation injury or sham surgery.

Mean specific force in EDL muscles of saline-treated (open circles) and 4-AP-treated (closed circles) animals. (A) Force frequency relationship of EDL muscles isolated from the right hind limbs of sham surgery animals (n = 3 mice/group). (B) Force frequency relationship of EDL muscles isolated from the injured limbs of sciatic nerve crush injury (n = 4 mice/group, *P < 0.05, vs. saline group). (C) Force frequency relationship of EDL muscles isolated from the injured limbs of sciatic nerve denervation injury (n = 3-4 mice/group) Data presented as the mean ± SEM. 4-AP: 4-Aminopyridine; EDL: extensor digitorum longus.

NRR-15-2098_Suppl2.tif (493.6KB, tif)

Additional Table 1: Primers used in real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.

Additional Table 2: Selected pharmacokinetic parameters after oral or intraperitoneal 4-AP administration.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Financial support: This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH; K08 AR060164-01A) and the Department of Defense (DoD; W81XWH-16-1-0725) to JCE in addition to institutional support from the University of Rochester and Pennsylvania State University Medical Centers.

Institutional review board statement: The animal experiments were approved by the University Committee on Animal Research (UCAR) at the University of Rochester (UCAR-2009-019) on March 31, 2017.

Copyright license agreement: The Copyright License Agreement has been signed by all authors before publication.

Data sharing statement: Datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Plagiarism check: Checked twice by iThenticate.

Peer review: Externally peer reviewed.

Funding: This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH; K08 AR060164-01A) and the Department of Defense (DoD; W81XWH-16-1-0725) to JCE in addition to institutional support from the University of Rochester and Pennsylvania State University Medical Centers.

C-Editors: Zhao M, Li CH; T-Editor: Jia Y

References

  • 1.Agoston S, Bowman WC, Houwertjes MC, Rodger IW, Savage AO. Direct action of 4-aminopyridine on the contractility of a fast-contracting muscle in the cat. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1982;9:21–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.1982.tb00775.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Allan SM, Rothwell NJ. Cytokines and acute neurodegeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:734–744. doi: 10.1038/35094583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blight AR. Effect of 4-aminopyridine on axonal conduction-block in chronic spinal cord injury. Brain Res Bull. 1989;22:47–52. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(89)90126-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Blight AR, Henney HR., 3rd Pharmacokinetics of 14C-radioactivity after oral intake of a single dose of 14C-labeled fampridine (4-aminopyridine) in healthy volunteers. Clin Ther. 2009;31:328–335. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bosse F, Küry P, Müller HW. Gene expression profiling and molecular aspects in peripheral nerve regeneration. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2001;19(1-2):5–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Burnett AL, Sezen SF, Hoke A, Caggiano AO, Iaci J, Lagoda G, Musicki B, Bella AJ. GGF2 is neuroprotective in a rat model of cavernous nerve injury-induced erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2015;12:897–905. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Burnett MG, Zager EL. Pathophysiology of peripheral nerve injury: a brief review. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;16:E1. doi: 10.3171/foc.2004.16.5.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Caggiano A, Blight A. Identification of metabolites of dalfampridine (4-aminopyridine) in human subjects and reaction phenotyping of relevant cytochrome P450 pathways. J Drug Assess. 2013;2:117–126. doi: 10.3109/21556660.2013.833099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Campbell WW. Evaluation and management of peripheral nerve injury. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119:1951–1965. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chandy KG, DeCoursey TE, Cahalan MD, McLaughlin C, Gupta S. Voltage-gated potassium channels are required for human T lymphocyte activation. J Exp Med. 1984;160:369–385. doi: 10.1084/jem.160.2.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Clark AR, Hsu CG, Talukder MAH, Noble M, Elfar JC. Transdermal delivery of 4-aminopyridine accelerates motor functional recovery and improves nerve morphology following sciatic nerve crush injury in mice. Neural Regen Res. 2020;15:136–144. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.264471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Davis FA, Stefoski D, Rush J. Orally administered 4-aminopyridine improves clinical signs in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 1990;27:186–192. doi: 10.1002/ana.410270215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Day CS, Riano F, Tomaino MM, Buranatanitkit B, Somogyi G, Sotereanos D, Huard J. Growth factor may decrease muscle atrophy secondary to denervation. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2001;17:51–57. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-12689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dubový P, Jančálek R, Kubek T. Role of inflammation and cytokines in peripheral nerve regeneration. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2013;108:173–206. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-410499-0.00007-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Egeberg MD, Oh CY, Bainbridge JL. Clinical overview of dalfampridine: an agent with a novel mechanism of action to help with gait disturbances. Clin Ther. 2012;34:2185–2194. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Elfar JC, Jacobson JA, Puzas JE, Rosier RN, Zuscik MJ. Erythropoietin accelerates functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1644–1653. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Engel AG, Stonnington HH. Trophic functions of the neuron. II Denervation and regulation of muscle Morphological effects of denervation of muscle A quantitative ultrastructural study. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1974;228:68–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb20503.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Espejo C, Montalban X. Dalfampridine in multiple sclerosis: from symptomatic treatment to immunomodulation. Clin Immunol. 2012;142:84–92. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2011.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fischer LR, Li Y, Asress SA, Jones DP, Glass JD. Absence of SOD1 leads to oxidative stress in peripheral nerve and causes a progressive distal motor axonopathy. Exp Neurol. 2012;233:163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.09.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gaudet AD, Popovich PG, Ramer MS. Wallerian degeneration: gaining perspective on inflammatory events after peripheral nerve injury. J Neuroinflammation. 2011;8:110. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-8-110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.George A, Buehl A, Sommer C. Wallerian degeneration after crush injury of rat sciatic nerve increases endo- and epineurial tumor necrosis factor-alpha protein. Neurosci Lett. 2004;372:215–219. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.09.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.George A, Buehl A, Sommer C. Tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 and 2 proteins are differentially regulated during Wallerian degeneration of mouse sciatic nerve. Exp Neurol. 2005;192:163–166. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gillen C, Gleichmann M, Spreyer P, Müller HW. Differentially expressed genes after peripheral nerve injury. J Neurosci Res. 1995;42:159–171. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490420203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Goodman AD, Stone RT. Enhancing neural transmission in multiple sclerosis (4-aminopyridine therapy) Neurotherapeutics. 2013;10:106–110. doi: 10.1007/s13311-012-0156-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Guénard V, Dinarello CA, Weston PJ, Aebischer P. Peripheral nerve regeneration is impeded by interleukin-1 receptor antagonist released from a polymeric guidance channel. J Neurosci Res. 1991;29:396–400. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490290315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hakim CH, Li D, Duan D. Monitoring murine skeletal muscle function for muscle gene therapy. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;709:75–89. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61737-982-6_5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hansebout RR, Blight AR, Fawcett S, Reddy K. 4-Aminopyridine in chronic spinal cord injury: a controlled, double-blind, crossover study in eight patients. J Neurotrauma. 1993;10:1–18. doi: 10.1089/neu.1993.10.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Horie H, Inagaki Y, Sohma Y, Nozawa R, Okawa K, Hasegawa M, Muramatsu N, Kawano H, Horie M, Koyama H, Sakai I, Takeshita K, Kowada Y, Takano M, Kadoya T. Galectin-1 regulates initial axonal growth in peripheral nerves after axotomy. J Neurosci. 1999;19:9964–9974. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-22-09964.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Horie H, Kadoya T. Identification of oxidized galectin-1 as an initial repair regulatory factor after axotomy in peripheral nerves. Neurosci Res. 2000;38:131–137. doi: 10.1016/s0168-0102(00)00142-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hynes MA, Gitt M, Barondes SH, Jessell TM, Buck LB. Selective expression of an endogenous lactose-binding lectin gene in subsets of central and peripheral neurons. J Neurosci. 1990;10:1004–1013. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-03-01004.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Inserra MM, Bloch DA, Terris DJ. Functional indices for sciatic, peroneal, and posterior tibial nerve lesions in the mouse. Microsurgery. 1998;18:119–124. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2752(1998)18:2<119::aid-micr10>3.0.co;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jankowska E, Lundberg A, Rudomin P, Sykova E. Effects of 4-aminopyridine on synaptic transmission in the cat spinal cord. Brain Res. 1982;240:117–129. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90649-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jensen HB, Nielsen JL, Ravnborg M, Dalgas U, Aagaard P, Stenager E. Effect of slow release-Fampridine on muscle strength, rate of force development, functional capacity and cognitive function in an enriched population of MS patients. A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016;10:137–144. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kauppinen TM. Multiple roles for poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-1 in neurological disease. Neurochem Int. 2007;50(7-8):954–958. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2006.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kim Y, Remacle AG, Chernov AV, Liu H, Shubayev I, Lai C, Dolkas J, Shiryaev SA, Golubkov VS, Mizisin AP, Strongin AY, Shubayev VI. The MMP-9/TIMP-1 axis controls the status of differentiation and function of myelin-forming Schwann cells in nerve regeneration. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lanza C, Raimondo S, Vergani L, Catena N, Sénès F, Tos P, Geuna S. Expression of antioxidant molecules after peripheral nerve injury and regeneration. J Neurosci Res. 2012;90:842–848. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li S, Liu Q, Wang Y, Gu Y, Liu D, Wang C, Ding G, Chen J, Liu J, Gu X. Differential gene expression profiling and biological process analysis in proximal nerve segments after sciatic nerve transection. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lien SC, Cederna PS, Kuzon WM. Optimizing skeletal muscle reinnervation with nerve transfer. Hand Clin. 2008;24:445-454, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2008.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu W, Wei-LaPierre L, Klose A, Dirksen RT, Chakkalakal JV. Inducible depletion of adult skeletal muscle stem cells impairs the regeneration of neuromuscular junctions. Elife. 2015:4. doi: 10.7554/eLife.09221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lundh H. Effects of 4-aminopyridine on neuromuscular transmission. Brain Res. 1978;153:307–318. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90409-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lundh H, Nilsson O, Rosén I. Effects of 4-aminopyridine in myasthenia gravis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1979;42:171–175. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.42.2.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.McDonald DS, Cheng C, Martinez JA, Zochodne DW. Regenerative arrest of inflamed peripheral nerves: role of nitric oxide. Neuroreport. 2007;18:1635–1640. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f03fff. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Menorca RM, Fussell TS, Elfar JC. Nerve physiology: mechanisms of injury and recovery. Hand Clin. 2013;29:317–330. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Modrak M, Sundem L, Gupta R, Zuscik MJ, Elfar J. Pharmacological attenuation of electrical effects in a model of compression neuropathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101:523–530. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Moresi V, Williams AH, Meadows E, Flynn JM, Potthoff MJ, McAnally J, Shelton JM, Backs J, Klein WH, Richardson JA, Bassel-Duby R, Olson EN. Myogenin and class II HDACs control neurogenic muscle atrophy by inducing E3 ubiquitin ligases. Cell. 2010;143:35–45. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Nashmi R, Fehlings MG. Mechanisms of axonal dysfunction after spinal cord injury: with an emphasis on the role of voltage-gated potassium channels. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2001;38(1-2):165–191. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0173(01)00134-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Noble M, Tseng KC, Li H, Elfar JC. 4-Aminopyridine as a single agent diagnostic and treatment for severe nerve crush injury. Mil Med. 2019;184(Suppl 1):379–385. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Pratt K, Toombs JP, Widmer WR, Borgens RB. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of 4-aminopyridine following intravenous injection and metered intrathecal delivery in canines. J Neurotrauma. 1995;12:23–39. doi: 10.1089/neu.1995.12.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Quintá HR, Pasquini JM, Rabinovich GA, Pasquini LA. Glycan-dependent binding of galectin-1 to neuropilin-1 promotes axonal regeneration after spinal cord injury. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21:941–955. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2014.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Robinson LR. Traumatic injury to peripheral nerves. Muscle Nerve. 2000;23:863–873. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(200006)23:6<863::aid-mus4>3.0.co;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sanders DB, Massey JM, Sanders LL, Edwards LJ. A randomized trial of 3, 4-diaminopyridine in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Neurology. 2000;54:603–607. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.3.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sherratt RM, Bostock H, Sears TA. Effects of 4-aminopyridine on normal and demyelinated mammalian nerve fibres. Nature. 1980;283:570–572. doi: 10.1038/283570a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Shi R, Blight AR. Differential effects of low and high concentrations of 4-aminopyridine on axonal conduction in normal and injured spinal cord. Neuroscience. 1997;77:553–562. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(96)00477-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Smith KJ, Felts PA, John GR. Effects of 4-aminopyridine on demyelinated axons, synapses and muscle tension. Brain. 2000;123(Pt 1):171–184. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.1.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sobotka S, Mu L. Muscle reinnervation with nerve-muscle-endplate band grafting technique: correlation between force recovery and axonal regeneration. J Surg Res. 2015;195:144–151. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sriram CS, Jangra A, Kasala ER, Bodduluru LN, Bezbaruah BK. Targeting poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase1 in neurological diseases: A promising trove for new pharmacological interventions to enter clinical translation. Neurochem Int. 2014;76:70–81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2014.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sriram CS, Jangra A, Madhana RM, Gurjar SS, Mohan P, Bezbaruah BK. Multiple facets of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 in neurological diseases. Neural Regen Res. 2015;10:49–51. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.150653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Stoll G, Jander S, Myers RR. Degeneration and regeneration of the peripheral nervous system: from Augustus Waller’s observations to neuroinflammation. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2002;7:13–27. doi: 10.1046/j.1529-8027.2002.02002.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Targ EF, Kocsis JD. 4-Aminopyridine leads to restoration of conduction in demyelinated rat sciatic nerve. Brain Res. 1985;328:358–361. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)91049-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Temporin K, Tanaka H, Kuroda Y, Okada K, Yachi K, Moritomo H, Murase T, Yoshikawa H. Interleukin-1 beta promotes sensory nerve regeneration after sciatic nerve injury. Neurosci Lett. 2008;440:130–133. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.05.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Terenghi G. Peripheral nerve regeneration and neurotrophic factors. J Anat. 1999;194(Pt 1):1–14. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1999.19410001.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tseng KC, Li H, Clark A, Sundem L, Zuscik M, Noble M, Elfar J. 4-Aminopyridine promotes functional recovery and remyelination in acute peripheral nerve injury. EMBO Mol Med. 2016;8:1409–1420. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201506035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Uges DR, Sohn YJ, Greijdanus B, Scaf AH, Agoston S. 4-Aminopyridine kinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1982;31:587–593. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1982.82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Van Diemen HA, Polman CH, Koetsier JC, Van Loenen AC, Nauta JJ, Bertelsmann FW. 4-Aminopyridine in patients with multiple sclerosis: dosage and serum level related to efficacy and safety. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1993;16:195–204. doi: 10.1097/00002826-199306000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Varejão AS, Meek MF, Ferreira AJ, Patrício JA, Cabrita AM. Functional evaluation of peripheral nerve regeneration in the rat: walking track analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2001;108:1–9. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0270(01)00378-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Varija D, Kumar KP, Reddy KP, Reddy VK. Prolonged constriction of sciatic nerve affecting oxidative stressors & antioxidant enzymes in rat. Indian J Med Res. 2009;129:587–592. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Wirtz PW, Verschuuren JJ, van Dijk JG, de Kam ML, Schoemaker RC, van Hasselt JG, Titulaer MJ, Tjaden UR, den Hartigh J, van Gerven JM. Efficacy of 3, 4-diaminopyridine and pyridostigmine in the treatment of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;86:44–48. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wyss-Coray T, Mucke L. Inflammation in neurodegenerative disease--a double-edged sword. Neuron. 2002;35:419–432. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00794-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Yue L, Talukder MAH, Gurjar A, Lee JI, Noble M, Dirksen RT, Chakkalakal J, Elfar JC. 4-Aminopyridine attenuates muscle atrophy after sciatic nerve crush injury in mice. Muscle Nerve. 2019;60:192–201. doi: 10.1002/mus.26516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Additional Figure 1

Effect of daily intraperitoneal 4-AP (10 µg) treatment on the motor functional recovery after sciatic nerve crush or denervation injury.

(A) Time-course for the post-injury SFI recovery after crush injury (n = 5-6 mice/group; *P < 0.05, vs. respective 4-AP). (B) Time-course for the post-injury SFI recovery after denervation injury (n = 5 mice/group). Data presented as the mean ± SEM. 4-AP: 4-Aminopyridine; SFI: sciatic function index.

NRR-15-2098_Suppl1.tif (411KB, tif)
Additional Figure 2

Effect of daily intraperitoneal 4-AP (10 µg) treatment on the ex vivo contractile function in EDL muscles at 14 days following crush or denervation injury or sham surgery.

Mean specific force in EDL muscles of saline-treated (open circles) and 4-AP-treated (closed circles) animals. (A) Force frequency relationship of EDL muscles isolated from the right hind limbs of sham surgery animals (n = 3 mice/group). (B) Force frequency relationship of EDL muscles isolated from the injured limbs of sciatic nerve crush injury (n = 4 mice/group, *P < 0.05, vs. saline group). (C) Force frequency relationship of EDL muscles isolated from the injured limbs of sciatic nerve denervation injury (n = 3-4 mice/group) Data presented as the mean ± SEM. 4-AP: 4-Aminopyridine; EDL: extensor digitorum longus.

NRR-15-2098_Suppl2.tif (493.6KB, tif)

Articles from Neural Regeneration Research are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES