Abstract
Sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC) is regarded as a rare malignant neoplasm associated with poor outcomes. This study aimed to explore the epidemiological characteristics and prognostic factors of SC, and establish a clinical predictive model. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used for data inquiry of patients with SC. Relevant population materials were used for age-adjusted incidence, limited-duration prevalence and prognostic analyses, and also for nomogram construction and validation. A total of 17,917 cases of SC were identified. Among them, 12,276 (68.52%) were women and 14,265 (79.62%) were white. Most cases occurred in the female genital system, accounting for 41.10% of all SCs. The median age at diagnosis was 68 years. The incidence and prevalence of SC increased substantially over time. The age-adjusted incidence increased from 0.31/100,000 in 1973 to 1.26/100,000 by 2014, a 4.06-fold change. Among site groups, the incidence of SC in the female genital and the respiratory system increased most significantly (P < 0.001). As for stage and grade, the incidence increased the most in distant and high-grade SC, respectively (P < 0.001). Moreover, the survival duration varied significantly by site, histology, stage and grade (P < 0.001). The multivariable analyses showed that the year of diagnosis, age, sex, race, grade, stage, and site were all significant prognostic factors (P < 0.001). Among these, stage and primary tumor site were the most valuable indicators of outcomes. Furthermore, a nomogram comprising age, histology, grade, stage and site were established to predict the 3-/5-year survival probability. The concordance indexes of the nomogram were 0.745 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.737-0.753) and 0.743 (95% CI: 0.728-0.756) for the internal and external validations, respectively. The calibration plot demonstrated satisfactory consistency between the actual and predicted outcomes in both the internal and external validations. In conclusion, increasing incidence and prevalence of SC was observed in our study, suggesting that SC is more prevalent than previously reported. Clinicians should be familiar with the characteristics of these tumors. Furthermore, the established nomogram could accurately predict the 3-/5-year survival rate of patients with SC, which may be of value for patient counselling and risk stratification.
Keywords: Epidemiology, incidence, nomogram, prognosis, SEER, sarcomatoid carcinoma
Introduction
Sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC) is an unusual type of neoplasm identified in a variety of organs, including breast, esophagus, lung, kidney and prostate [1-6]. It contains both carcinomatous and sarcomatous components, each of which exhibits typical histological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural patterns, indicative of their diverse differentiation [7,8]. Since its first description by Virchow in 1864, different terms, such as sarcomatoid carcinoma, carcinosarcoma, pseudosarcoma, pleomorphic carcinoma and spindle cell carcinoma, have been used to represent SC due to its unclear etiology [9-15]. Due to its frequent metastasis and chemo-resistance, SC tends to present at an advanced stage at diagnosis and is associated with poor outcomes [16].
At present, almost all studies on SC have been case reports or clinical series. There is a lack of the population-based study, let alone a systematically comparative study on the incidence, prevalence and survival of SC through all anatomical sites. The National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program is a comprehensive population-based database updated annually [17,18]. Therefore, this population-based study was conducted through collating and analyzing data from the SEER database to determine the epidemiological, clinical, and prognostic features of SC systematically.
Besides, there is currently no study to generate a nomogram to predict the prognosis for patients with SC. Hence, this study also aimed to develop a unique nomogram based on a large population-based cohort from the SEER database to assist clinicians with the prediction of 3-/5-year overall survival (OS) rates in patients with SC.
Materials and methods
Data source
The SEER database submitted in November 2018 was used in this study [18]. The study design is presented in Figure 1. The histologic codes from the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd Edition (ICD-O-3), were used to identify patients with SC. The correspondences between the codes and clinical/histological diagnoses for all anatomical sites were as follows: pleomorphic carcinoma (8022); giant cell carcinoma (8031); spindle cell carcinoma (8032); pseudosarcomatous carcinoma (8033); and carcinosarcoma (8980).
Figure 1.

A flowchart for patient screening and study design. SEER, the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset; SC, sarcomatoid carcinoma; ICD-O-3, International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd Edition.
SC stage and classification
The SEER staging system was used for analysis in the present study due to the lack of a unified staging system for SC. Tumors were classified as localized, regional, or distant. A localized SC was defined as an invasive neoplasm confined entirely to the organ of origin. A regional SC was defined as a neoplasm extended beyond the limits of the organ of origin but with no distant metastasis. Finally, a distant SC was defined as a neoplasm invading the areas of the body distant or remote from the primary tumor. The SEER grading system was used to classify cases as grade (G) I, well differentiated; GII, moderately differentiated; GIII, poorly differentiated; and GIV, undifferentiated or anaplastic.
Nomogram construction and validation
All eligible patients (8800) were randomly divided into 3:1 training (6600) and validating (2200) groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used for evaluating prognostic factors. Afterward, a nomogram model was constructed based on the training cohort to predict 3-/5-year OS by including significant prognostic factors, according to the Cox regression model. The nomogram was validated based mainly on the internal (training cohort) and external (validation cohort) discrimination and calibration measurements. The concordance index (C-index) was used to evaluate the discriminative capacity of the nomogram, which mainly measured the differences between predicted and actual outcomes. A higher C-index suggested a superior discriminative capacity for survival outcomes. Calibration, which compared the predicted survival with the actual survival, was evaluated with a calibration curve. A calibration plot along the 45-degree line indicated a perfect model, with remarkable consistency between the predicted and actual outcomes.
Statistical analysis
In this study, descriptive statistics were used to analyze the demographic and tumor characteristics of patients. The Pearson Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables among different groups. Continuous variables were compared using one-way analysis of variance. The survival analysis was completed with the log-rank test. To identify the risk factors for survival, the Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis and to calculate the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). The incidence with 95% CI and limited-duration prevalence rates (10-year and 20-year) was calculated using the SEER*Stat software (version 8.3.6; Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute). All other statistical calculations were performed using SPSS (version 23, IBM, NY, USA). Significance was set as P < 0.05 in a two-tailed test.
Results
Annual incidence
The age-adjusted incidence of SC based on the 2000 US standard population was calculated using information from the SEER database. Since the SEER 9 (1973-1991), 13 (1992-1999), and 18 (2000-2014) registries were associated with different population datasets, we calculated the age-adjusted incidence for three time periods. The age-adjusted incidence of SC increased significantly over time, specifically from 0.31/100,000 in 1973 to 1.26/100,000 in 2014, as shown in Figure 2A (compared with the age-adjusted incidence of all malignancies) and Supplementary Table 1.
Figure 2.
The age-adjusted incidence of sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC) over time by primary tumor site, stage and grade. (A) The age-adjusted incidence of all SCs and malignant neoplasms. (B) The age-adjusted incidence of SC by primary tumor site, (C) stage, and (D) grade at diagnosis (1973-2014).
In addition, we specifically analyzed the incidence trend of different primary tumor sites and noted a significant increase of SC in the female genital system and respiratory system, with an age-adjusted incidence from 1.58/10,000 in 1973 to 6.51/10,000 in 2014 and 0.48/10,000 in 1973 to 3.07/10,000 in 2014, respectively (Figure 2B).
Then, the incidence of different stage groups was analyzed, revealing that the incidence of distant SC increased most significantly, from 0.86/10,000 in 1973 to 4.64/10,000 in 2014 (P < 0.001, Figure 2C). Among grade groups, the incidence increased the most in GIII SC, from 0.54/10,000 in 1973 to 2.61/10,000 in 2014 (P < 0.001, Figure 2D).
Prevalence
To further investigate the burden of SC, we analyzed the 10-/20-year limited-duration prevalence of SC. The results suggested that the 20-year limited-duration prevalence of SC increased significantly, from 0.00035% in 1995 to 0.00393% in 2014 (P < 0.001) (Figure 3A). Supplementary Table 2 shows the details of the 10-/20-year limited-duration prevalence and absolute counts of SC. Among site groups, the prevalence was the highest in the female genital system, followed by the respiratory system and breast. Regarding tumor grade, the prevalence of GIII SC increased most significantly and the prevalence was the highest in localized disease among stage groups (Figure 3).
Figure 3.

Limited-duration prevalence of sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC). (A) 20-Year limited-duration prevalence of all SCs and according to the primary tumor site. (B) 20-Year limited-duration prevalence of SC by stage, and (C) grade.
Patient characteristics
The collected datasets contained a total of 17,917 patients with SC, including 2,183, 1,913, and 13,821 in SEER 9, 13, and 18 registries, respectively. Among them, 12,276 (68.52%) were women and 5,641 (31.48%) were men. Further, 79.62% were white, 14.13% were black, 5.58% were Asian/Pacific Islander, and 0.47% were American Indian/Alaskan native. For the whole cohort, the median age at diagnosis was 68 years (mean, 68; standard deviation, 13). Regarding the primary tumor site, most cases had primary tumor sites in the female genital system and respiratory system, accounting for 41.10% and 29.09%, respectively (Supplementary Table 3). In the female genital tract, approximately 79.63% arose from the uterus and 17.48% from the ovary. In the respiratory system, most cases were of the lung and bronchus (93.51%). The details related to the site distribution of SC are shown in Supplementary Table 4.
Age at diagnosis
The study then analyzed differences in the age at diagnosis of SC based on sex, race and primary tumor site. No difference was observed in age at diagnosis between men and women (P = 0.543). Among race groups, white patients had the maximum median and mean ages at diagnosis (P < 0.001). Besides, the ages at diagnosis of patients with SC in different primary tumor sites also differed significantly (P < 0.001). The details are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Age and disease stage at diagnosis of sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC) by sex, race, and primary tumor site
| Characteristic | Age at Diagnosis (years) | Disease Stage (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||
| Median | Mean | Standard Deviation | Localized | Regional | Distant | |
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 69 | 68 | 13 | 20.33 | 34.30 | 45.36 |
| Female | 68 | 68 | 13 | 32.94 | 29.58 | 37.48 |
| Race | ||||||
| White | 69 | 68 | 12 | 29.93 | 30.58 | 39.50 |
| Black | 65 | 65 | 12 | 27.49 | 33.26 | 39.25 |
| Asian/P Islander | 64 | 64 | 13 | 27.62 | 29.54 | 42.84 |
| AI/AN | 63 | 63 | 13 | 17.33 | 29.33 | 53.33 |
| Tumor site | ||||||
| Breast | 63 | 63 | 15 | 63.84 | 26.56 | 9.60 |
| Digestive system | 69 | 68 | 13 | 24.09 | 29.66 | 46.26 |
| Endocrine system | 70 | 68 | 14 | 11.42 | 40.94 | 47.64 |
| Female genital system | 68 | 68 | 12 | 33.14 | 28.09 | 38.77 |
| Male genital system | 75 | 73 | 12 | 22.86 | 14.29 | 62.86 |
| Oral cavity and pharynx | 66 | 64 | 16 | 39.23 | 44.98 | 15.79 |
| Respiratory system | 68 | 68 | 12 | 17.93 | 31.01 | 51.07 |
| Soft tissue including heart | 69 | 67 | 16 | 38.34 | 27.46 | 34.20 |
| Urinary system | 73 | 71 | 14 | 21.82 | 50.05 | 28.13 |
| Other | 71 | 70 | 14 | 35.91 | 25.97 | 38.12 |
Abbreviations: P Islander, Pacific Islander; AI/AN, American Indian/Alaskan native.
Tumor stage
Next, we explored the factors associated with the disease stage. A strong correlation was found between the primary tumor site and disease stage in 15,355 SC cases with explicitly stated stage information (Table 1; P < 0.001). In addition, the analysis of 9671 patients with grade information confirmed that tumor grade was also strongly associated with the disease stage (P < 0.001). Further, 12.93% of GI and 13.05% of GII tumors had synchronous distant metastasis at diagnosis, while for high-grade tumors (GIII and GIV), patients with synchronous distant metastasis accounted for 36.49% and 40.26%, respectively.
In addition, other factors related to the disease stage included sex and race (Table 1). The present study found that male patients were more likely to have synchronous distant metastasis at diagnosis compared with female patients (45.36% vs 37.48%; P < 0.001). For different races, about 53.33% of American Indian/Alaskan Native patients had metastasis at presentation, which was most likely to present with advanced disease among race groups (P = 0.008).
Survival
The median OS for all patients was 24 months. SC in the breast (> 360 months) and soft tissue (> 360 months) had the best median OS among site groups, while SC in the endocrine system (5 months) and digestive system (6 months) had the worst median OS. Among different histology groups, carcinosarcoma (36 months) had the best median OS, while giant cell carcinoma (6 months) had the worst median OS. Localized SC (> 360 months) performed the best compared with regional (30 months) and distant SC (7 months) (P < 0.001). For tumor grade, the study found that patients with GI and GII SC had similar survival curves, and did not achieve their median OS. The median survival duration in patients with GIII and GIV tumors was 124 and 64 months, respectively (Supplementary Figure 1). All these comparisons were statistically significant (P < 0.001).
The survival patterns were then assessed based on the primary tumor site and stage (Figure 4A and Supplementary Table 5). In localized SC, the median OS of most sites had not been reached, except for those in the digestive system (112 months), endocrine system (66 months) and respiratory system (191 months). Regarding regional SC, the median OS ranged from 7 months for SC in the endocrine system to more than 360 months in the breast. For distant SC, cases in the female genital system had the best median OS (14 months); the median OS of SC in the digestive system (2 months), endocrine system (3 months) and respiratory system (3 months) was the worst. All these differences in OS were significant (P < 0.001).
Figure 4.
(A) Median overall survival (OS), (B) 3-year survival rate, and (C) 5-year survival rate of sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC) across the primary tumor site according to disease stage. The maximum follow-up time was 360 months.
Finally, we evaluated the 3-/5-year survival rates according to the primary tumor site and stage (Figure 4B, 4C). The 3-year survival rates for patients with local disease ranged from 53.6% for those with SC in the endocrine system to 90.3% for those in the oral cavity and pharynx. Even for regional/distant disease, the 3-year survival rates of each tumor site varied greatly, ranging from 53.2%/46% for regional/distant SC in the digestive system to 85%/80.8% for regional/distant SC in the oral cavity and pharynx. Similarly, for localized, regional and distant disease, the 5-year survival rates of SC in different primary tumor sites also varied greatly. The details are shown in Supplementary Table 5.
Multivariable analysis of OS
Next, multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model to further explore the risk factors for patients with SC. Potentially prognostic factors were included in this model, including age, sex, race, histology, grade, disease stage, primary tumor site and period of diagnosis (1973-1986, 1987-2000 and 2001-2014). All included parameters were found to have a correlation with survival. Patients with GIII and GIV SC (GIII: HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.13-2.07; GIV: HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.14-2.10) had worse OS compared with those with GI SC. Regarding the disease stage, the OS of regional SC (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 2.01-2.32) and distant SC (HR, 5.14; 95% CI, 4.81-5.49) was significantly worse compared with that of localized SC. The primary tumor site was also an important factor affecting the prognosis of patients with SC. This disease had the worst OS in the endocrine system (HR, 2.86; 95% CI, 2.36-3.46) compared with the breast (Figure 5).
Figure 5.

Forest plot of Cox regression analysis for sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC). Horizontal axis: hazard ratio with the reference line, hazard ratios (square) and 95% CI (whiskers).
Nomogram
A total of 8800 patients from all included cohorts were brought into the study according to the model-building requirements (Figure 1). Among all eligible patients, 6600 and 2200 subjects were assigned to the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Supplementary Table 6 lists the baseline clinicopathological characteristics; no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups. Afterward, a nomogram model was constructed based on the training cohort by including the significant prognostic factors, according to the Cox regression model (Figure 6A). The nomogram was internally and externally validated. The C-indexes for OS prediction in the nomogram were 0.745 (95% CI: 0.737-0.753) and 0.743 (95% CI: 0.728-0.756) for the training (internal validation) and validation (external validation) cohorts, respectively. The predictors included age, histology, grade, stage and primary tumor site. Although sex and race were statistically significant predictors of prognosis in Cox regression analysis, they were also excluded to maintain the simplicity and applicability of the predictive model due to their little impact on survival. In the nomogram, the primary tumor site had the greatest prognostic significance among all predictive indicators, which got a maximum of 100 points. In addition, stage (73 points), age (55 points), grade (29 points) and histology (14 points) were also individually important predictors of OS. Supplementary Table 7 shows the specific scores for each variable. Each number/category of these variables corresponded to a score on the “Points” scale. After summing up the total score and locating it on the “Total Points” scale, a line drawn straight down to the “3-/5-Year Survival Probability” scale showed the probability at each time point. Finally, the internal (Figure 6B) and external (Figure 6C) calibration plots of the nomogram showed great consistency between the nomogram-based predictions and actual outcomes.
Figure 6.

Nomogram to predict the 3-/5-year survival probabilities of patients with sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC) and the calibration of the nomogram using the training and validation sets. (A) Points are assigned for age, histology, tumor grade, disease stage and primary tumor site by drawing a line upward from the corresponding values to the “Points” line. The sum of these five points is located on the “Total Points” line, and a line projected down to the bottom scales determines the probabilities of 3-/5-year overall survival (OS). Calibration plots of the nomogram for 3-/5-year OS prediction in the training set (B) and 3-/5-year OS prediction in the validation set (C). The gray line represents the ideal nomogram, and the red line represents the observed nomogram. The predicted probability of OS by the nomogram is projected onto the x-axis, and the actual OS is projected onto the y-axis.
Discussion
In this population-based study, we analyzed the epidemiology and prognostic factors of SC using a large amount of data integrated into the SEER program. The study demonstrated a 4.06-fold increase in the annual age-adjusted incidence of SC from 1973 (0.31/100,000) to 2014 (1.26/100,000), indicating a significant increase over time. In addition, a systematically comparative analysis of SC cases from 1973 to 2014 provided extensive details about the trends of SC incidence in different anatomical sites, which was very different from that in previous studies focusing only on a single anatomical site in a limited period. Our results showed that the increase in incidence was the greatest in the female genital system (4.12-fold) and respiratory system (6.39-fold). It was speculated that the aforementioned increasing trends might be closely related to the increased application of endoscopic and imaging procedures in patients with SC. Notably, the present study using the SEER 18 registry program (2000-2014) found that the highest incidence of SC was 6.51 per 10,000 in the female genital system. Indeed, the study by Gunjal Garg et al. [19] demonstrated that the age-adjusted incidence of uterine and ovarian SC was 6/10,000 and 1.9/10,000, respectively, which was consistent with present results. Moreover, although the rise in incidence occurred across all tumor stages of patients with SC, the distant disease increased most significantly. Interestingly, with the improvement in the guideline on the staging system of SC, the incidence of unstaged cases has significantly decreased. Regarding tumor grade, previous studies showed that most cases of SC were high grade (GIII and GIV) [20,21]. In this study, we found that the incidence of high-grade tumors increased most significantly. The increase was likely caused in part by the improvements in the classification of these tumors.
Currently, published case reports and clinical series have indicated dismal outcomes for SC [22-28]. However, still no survival studies based on the primary tumor site and stage have been reported. Previous studies reported a short median OS ranging from 8 to 19 months [28-30] for patients with pulmonary SC, from 16 to 40 months for uterine SC [31,32], and from 8 to 32 months for ovarian SC [33-36]. However, in the present study, the population-based analysis showed that SC in the endocrine system (5 months) and digestive system (6 months) had the worst median OS among all site groups. In addition, the prognosis of patients with SC in different stage groups varied greatly. In the present study, patients with localized SC did remarkably well and did not yet achieve their median OS. However, the prognosis of regional and distant SC was extremely poor and the median OS was 30 and 7 months, respectively. Favorable outcomes in the local disease group highlighted the importance of early disease detection and treatment. Although the prognosis of patients with SC was poor, their OS improved over time, reflecting the improvement in anticancer therapies, including the emerging targeted therapy and immunotherapy [37,38].
For further exploration of the risk factors for patients with SC, we performed multivariate survival analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model. Among the included parameters, the primary tumor site and disease stage were the most useful prognostic predictors in patients with SC. Therefore, combining the primary tumor site and disease stage as prognostic markers, we were better able to separate prognosis into categories. Based on the aforementioned analysis, the stratified analysis of patients diagnosed from 1973 to 2014 was performed according to the primary tumor site and disease stage. The results are listed in Supplementary Table 5, which can be a practical guide for clinicians.
In recent years, nomograms based on the SEER database have been developed and shown to be more accurate compared with the conventional staging systems for predicting prognosis in some cancers, and demonstrated favorable discrimination and calibrations, which were internally and externally validated within the database [39-41]. In the present study, a nomogram, including age, histology, grade, stage, and primary tumor site, was established to predict individual survival probability. In the internal and external validation sets, the calibration plots confirmed that the probabilities of 3-/5-year OS predicted using the nomogram were consistent with the actual survival rates, with the C-indexes of 0.745 (95% CI: 0.737-0.753) and 0.743 (95% CI: 0.728-0.756), respectively. Thus, the nomogram overcame the complexity of assessing the impact of multiple prognostic factors simultaneously and could provide patients with SC with simple and accurate prognostic predictions. It could support clinical decision-making and assist clinicians in communicating with patients and their families. To our knowledge, this was the first prognostic prediction model specifically developed for patients with SC.
In spite of the advantages using the SEER database to integrate a large number of cases to analyze the epidemiology and prognostic factors for SC, there also exits some limitations such as the information missing on the functional status and therapy strategies in patients with SC, both of which might be involved in the survival analysis of these patients. In addition, patients with SC would likely not report to the SEER registries unless considered to be malignant. Therefore, the true incidence and prevalence of SC might be actually underestimated. Indeed, any retrospective population-based study could not avoid these shortcomings. However, to our knowledge, this study was the most comprehensive exploration of SC with the largest sample size by far, and its size and long-term follow-up data have largely made up for the shortcomings.
Conclusions
The incidence and prevalence of SC were continuing to rise, and our results showed that in specific sites such as the female genital system and respiratory system, both of them were increasing at a higher rate. Differences were seen in survival rates according to the primary tumor site, grade and stage. However, it was certain that the outcomes generally improved with diagnosis and treatment progression. Furthermore, a unique nomogram, in which the primary tumor site was the most useful prognostic indicator, was established and validated internally and externally in the present study and could provide doctors and patients with accurate and useful information and guide the clinical decision-making for patients with SC.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to all the staff at the National Cancer Institute (USA) for their contribution to the SEER program. This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 8180, 2512); the project of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (no. 2018FZ0115); and full-time post-doctoral researcher and development foundation of Sichuan University (no. 2018SCU12034).
The authors have consented to publication after having read the final manuscript. No IRB approval was required because the SEER Database uses pseudonyms rather than real patient demographic data.
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
Abbreviations
- SC
sarcomatoid carcinoma
- SEER
surveillance, epidemiology and end results
- ICD-O-3
international classification of diseases for oncology, 3rd Edition
- PH
proportional hazard
- C-index
concordance index
- CI
confidence interval
- OS
overall survival
Supporting Information
References
- 1.Ware AD, Argani P, Cimino-Mathews A. Accuracy and clinical implications of pre-operative breast core needle biopsy diagnoses of fibroepithelial neoplasms and sarcomatoid carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;178:51–56. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05350-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Raza MA, Mazzara PF. Sarcomatoid carcinoma of esophagus. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135:945–948. doi: 10.5858/2010-0074-RSR.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Domblides C, Leroy K, Monnet I, Mazieres J, Barlesi F, Gounant V, Baldacci S, Mennecier B, Toffart AC, Audigier-Valette C, Doucet L, Giroux-Leprieur E, Guisier F, Ricordel C, Molinier O, Perol M, Pichon E, Robinet G, Templement-Grangerat D, Ruppert AM, Rabbe N, Antoine M, Wislez M. Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung sarcomatoid carcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2020;15:860–866. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ozturk H. Multiple carcinosarcomas of the kidney: a case report and review of the literature. Mol Clin Oncol. 2015;3:212–216. doi: 10.3892/mco.2014.411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Raghavan AM, Giffen ZC, Irwin PM, Mostafa HI, Buck BJ. PD-L1 pathway as a novel target in carcinosarcoma of the kidney and renal pelvis. Urol Case Rep. 2020;33:101261. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cheng Q, Chang X, Chen W, Qin J, Ai Q, Li H. A rare case of solitary fibrous tumor arising from prostate located inside of bladder. Urol Case Rep. 2019;24:100880. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2019.100880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ruess DA, Kayser C, Neubauer J, Fichtner-Feigl S, Hopt UT, Wittel UA. Carcinosarcoma of the pancreas: case report with comprehensive literature review. Pancreas. 2017;46:1225–1233. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lu H, Yang S, Zhu H, Tong X, Xie F, Qin J, Han N, Wu X, Fan Y, Shao YW, Mao W. Targeted next generation sequencing identified clinically actionable mutations in patients with esophageal sarcomatoid carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:251. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4159-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhao B, Lin J, Liu X, Zeng Y, Jia C, Guo W, Gong X, Zhou D, Hong Z, Shang H. Isaacs syndrome associated with GABAB and AChR antibodies in sarcomatoid carcinoma. Neurology. 2018;91:663–665. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.He Q, Shi X, Zhu H, Yan J, Yu XM. A case treated with crizotinib after secondary MET amplification of a double rare L747S and G719S EGFR mutation pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:544–546. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gotoh O, Sugiyama Y, Takazawa Y, Kato K, Tanaka N, Omatsu K, Takeshima N, Nomura H, Hasegawa K, Fujiwara K, Taki M, Matsumura N, Noda T, Mori S. Clinically relevant molecular subtypes and genomic alteration-independent differentiation in gynecologic carcinosarcoma. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4965. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12985-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ersek JL, Symanowski JT, Han Y, Howard A, Dumas K, Ahrens W, Kim E, Kim ES. Pulmonary carcinosarcoma: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) analysis. Clin Lung Cancer. 2019;21:160–170. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Osamura RY, Shimamura K, Hata J, Tamaoki N, Watanabe K, Kubota M, Yamazaki S, Mitomi T. Polypoid carcinoma of the esophagus. A unifying term for “carcinosarcoma” and “pseudosarcoma”. Am J Surg Pathol. 1978;2:201–208. doi: 10.1097/00000478-197806000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lee J, Choi Y, Jung HA, Lee SH, Ahn JS, Ahn MJ, Park K, Sun JM. Outstanding clinical efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2020;132:150–158. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.03.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Thompson LD, Wieneke JA, Miettinen M, Heffner DK. Spindle cell (sarcomatoid) carcinomas of the larynx: a clinicopathologic study of 187 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26:153–170. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200202000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Malla M, Wang JF, Trepeta R, Feng A, Wang J. Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016;14:366–372. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program. https://seer.cancer.gov/. Accessed February 1, 2017.
- 18.National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: SEER*stat database: SEER 17 registries. November 2014 submission (1973-2012). Accessed December 3, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Garg G, Shah JP, Kumar S, Bryant CS, Munkarah A, Morris RT. Ovarian and uterine carcinosarcomas: a comparative analysis of prognostic variables and survival outcomes. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20:888–894. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181dc8292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rossi G, Cavazza A, Sturm N, Migaldi M, Facciolongo N, Longo L, Maiorana A, Brambilla E. Pulmonary carcinomas with pleomorphic, sarcomatoid, or sarcomatous elements: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 75 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:311–324. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200303000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pelosi G, Sonzogni A, De Pas T, Galetta D, Veronesi G, Spaggiari L, Manzotti M, Fumagalli C, Bresaola E, Nappi O, Viale G, Rosai J. Review article: pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinomas: a practical overview. Int J Surg Pathol. 2010;18:103–120. doi: 10.1177/1066896908330049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zizi-Sermpetzoglou A, Savvaidou V, Tepelenis N, Galariotis N, Olympitis M, Stamatiou K. Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the prostate: a case report. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2010;3:319–322. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Huey RW, Makawita S, Xiao L, Matamoros A, Estrella JS, Overman MJ, Varadhachary GR, Raghav K. Sarcomatoid carcinoma presenting as cancers of unknown primary: a clinicopathological portrait. Bmc Cancer. 2019;19:965. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6155-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hou J, Xing L, Yuan Y. A clinical analysis of 114 cases of sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung. Clin Exp Med. 2018;18:555–562. doi: 10.1007/s10238-018-0517-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Maneenil K, Xue Z, Liu M, Boland J, Wu F, Stoddard SM, Molina J, Yang P. Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung: the mayo clinic experience in 127 patients. Clin Lung Cancer. 2018;19:e323–e333. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Welten VM, Lu PW, Fields AC, Yoo J, Melnitchouk N. Colorectal sarcomatoid carcinoma: a rare condition with poor outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24:2310–2313. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04709-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kim S, Kim MY, Koh J, Go H, Lee DS, Jeon YK, Chung DH. Programmed death-1 ligand 1 and 2 are highly expressed in pleomorphic carcinomas of the lung: comparison of sarcomatous and carcinomatous areas. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:2698–2707. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chaft JE, Sima CS, Ginsberg MS, Huang J, Kris MG, Travis WD, Azzoli CG. Clinical outcomes with perioperative chemotherapy in sarcomatoid carcinomas of the lung. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7:1400–1405. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182614856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pelosi G, Gasparini P, Cavazza A, Rossi G, Graziano P, Barbareschi M, Perrone F, Barberis M, Takagi M, Kunimura T, Yamada T, Nakatani Y, Pastorino U, Scanagatta P, Sozzi G, Garassino M, De Braud F, Papotti M. Multiparametric molecular characterization of pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma reveals a nonrandom amplification of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene. Lung Cancer. 2012;77:507–514. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.05.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Martin LW, Correa AM, Ordonez NG, Roth JA, Swisher SG, Vaporciyan AA, Walsh GL, Rice DC. Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung: a predictor of poor prognosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:973–980. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.03.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nemani D, Mitra N, Guo M, Lin L. Assessing the effects of lymphadenectomy and radiation therapy in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma: a SEER analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:82–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jonson AL, Bliss RL, Truskinovsky A, Judson P, Argenta P, Carson L, Dusenbery K, Downs LJ. Clinical features and outcomes of uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;100:561–564. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zorzou MP, Markaki S, Rodolakis A, Kastritis E, Bozas G, Dimopoulos MA, Papadimitriou CA. Clinicopathological features of ovarian carcinosarcomas: a single institution experience. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;96:136–142. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.09.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Brown E, Stewart M, Rye T, Al-Nafussi A, Williams AR, Bradburn M, Smyth J, Gabra H. Carcinosarcoma of the ovary: 19 years of prospective data from a single center. Cancer. 2004;100:2148–2153. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Harris MA, Delap LM, Sengupta PS, Wilkinson PM, Welch RS, Swindell R, Shanks JH, Wilson G, Slade RJ, Reynolds K, Jayson GC. Carcinosarcoma of the ovary. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:654–657. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cicin I, Saip P, Eralp Y, Selam M, Topuz S, Ozluk Y, Aydin Y, Topuz E. Ovarian carcinosarcomas: clinicopathological prognostic factors and evaluation of chemotherapy regimens containing platinum. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;108:136–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kotlowska MP, Rueda AG, Olmedo ME, Benito A, Roldan AS, Fernandez MM, Gorospe L, Palacios J, Garrido LP. Efficacy of immunotherapy in sarcomatoid lung cancer, a case report and literature review. Respir Med Case Rep. 2019;26:310–314. doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2019.02.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.D’Antonio F, De Sanctis R, Bolengo I, Destro A, Rahal D, De Vincenzo F, Santoro A. Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma presenting both ALK rearrangement and PD-L1 high positivity: a case report on the therapeutic regimen. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e16754. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Diao JD, Ma LX, Sun MY, Wu CJ, Wang LJ, Liu YL, Yang YJ. Construction and validation of a nomogram to predict overall survival in patients with inflammatory breast cancer. Cancer Med-Us. 2019;8:5600–5608. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yao Z, Zheng Z, Ke W, Wang R, Mu X, Sun F, Wang X, Garg S, Shi W, He Y, Liu Z. Prognostic nomogram for bladder cancer with brain metastases: a national cancer database analysis. J Transl Med. 2019;17:411. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-2109-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ge H, Yan Y, Xie M, Guo L, Tang D. Construction of a nomogram to predict overall survival for patients with M1 stage of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2019;72:96–101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


