Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2020 Dec 3;78(5):562–564. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4218

Overdose-Related Cardiac Arrests Observed by Emergency Medical Services During the US COVID-19 Epidemic

Joseph Friedman 1,, Leo Beletsky 2, David L Schriger 3
PMCID: PMC7716252  PMID: 33270086

Abstract

This cohort study characterizes emergent trends in overdose-related cardiac arrests in the US during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic using a large, national emergency medical services database.


The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic took grip of the US 2 decades into an accelerating overdose crisis that caused more than 70 000 deaths in 2019 alone.1 Front-line health care professionals and officials have sounded the alarm that the social and economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic may impede efforts to flatten the overdose curve.1,2 However, the state databases tracking overdose mortality often have long lags that stymie timely analysis and response.3 Emergency medical services (EMS) data provide a novel source of near-real-time information to track epidemiological trends during the COVID-19 pandemic.4,5 We leverage a large, national EMS database to characterize emergent trends in overdose mortality fueled by the pandemic.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational analysis using the National EMS Information System (NEMSIS), a large registry of more than 10 000 EMS agencies in 47 states, which contribute data in near real time and represent more than 80% of EMS activations nationally in 2020.5 We calculated weekly overdose-related cardiac arrests (determined on-site) and overdose-related EMS activations (determined by dispatch). In line with prior studies using NEMSIS data, we measured outcomes per EMS activations to adjust for call volume increases as new agencies join the system.5 We compared 2020 values with a baseline, defined as the weekly average of 2018 and 2019 values. Excess values for 2020 were compared temporally with a cell phone–based mobility score—a measure of social distancing.6 To account for potential pandemic-related decreases in call volume (the outcome denominator), we separately assessed trends using the average call volume for weeks 1 to 10 of 2020 (eMethods in the Supplement). This study was deemed exempt from review and informed consent by the UCLA Institutional Review Board.

Results

The 2020 NEMSIS database represents 25.9 million EMS activations, 50.5% from female patients and 50.2% from patients 61 years or older (Table). Overdose-related cardiac arrests rose sharply during April 2020, reaching 74.1 per 100 000 EMS activations (123.4% above baseline) by May 4 (Figure). Overdose-related cardiac arrests subsequently decreased but remained elevated, reaching 48.7 per 100 000 EMS activations (53.7% above baseline) by July 27. Overall, through August 1, overdose-related cardiac arrests in 2020 totaled 49.5 per 100 000 EMS activations (48.5% above baseline). These trends corresponded temporally with a sharp drop in mobility beginning March 16, reaching a minimum of −51.8% of baseline by April 13 and slowly increasing to −24.3% by July 27. Weekly rates of overdose-related EMS activations were elevated in 2020; however, values were largely similar before and during reductions in mobility, with 1635.2 per 100 000 EMS activations before March 16 and 1760.7 per 100 000 EMS activations after March 16 (18.5% and 16.7%, respectively, relative to baseline).

Table. Characteristics of the National EMS Information System Database, 2018-2020.

Characteristica EMS activations, No. (%) in millions
2020 (n = 25.9) 2019 (n = 36.1) 2018 (n = 26.3)
Age, y
No. 21 904 630 30 560 105 22 178 238
≤17 1.2 (5.5) 1.9 (6.2) 1.4 (6.3)
18-60 9.7 (44.3) 13.3 (43.5) 9.8 (43.9)
≥61 11.0 (50.2) 15.4 (50.3) 11.0 (49.3)
Sex
No. 22 028 271 30 803 060 22 512 209
Female 11.1 (50.5) 16.0 (51.8) 11.7 (52.1)
Male 10.9 (49.5) 14.8 (48.2) 10.8 (47.9)
Race/ethnicity
No. 17 141 837 25 217 659 18 423 105
American Indian or Alaska Native 0.2 (1.1) 0.3 (1.1) 0.2 (1.0)
Asian 0.2 (1.2) 0.3 (1.3) 0.2 (1.3)
Black or African American 4.4 (25.4) 6.3 (25.0) 4.4 (23.9)
Hispanic or Latino 1.5 (8.8) 2.2 (8.8) 1.6 (8.6)
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 0.1 (0.3) 0.1 (0.4) 0.1 (0.4)
White 10.8 (63.2) 16.0 (63.4) 11.9 (64.8)
Census division
No. 25 429 370 35 382 385 25 714 306
South Atlantic 8.0 (31.4) 11.6 (32.7) 7.4 (28.7)
Middle Atlantic 3.6 (14.2) 3.3 (8.9) 2.8 (10.9)
West South Central 3.5 (13.9) 4.7 (13.2) 3.5 (13.5)
Pacific 2.6 (10.4) 4.8 (13.6) 3.3 (12.8)
East North Central 2.1 (8.1) 3.5 (9.8) 2.8 (10.8)
Mountain 2.0 (7.8) 3.0 (8.5) 2.3 (9.1)
East South Central 1.6 (6.3) 1.9 (5.4) 1.6 (6.1)
West North Central 1.1 (4.4) 1.6 (4.4) 1.2 (4.6)
New England 0.9 (3.5) 1.2 (3.5) 0.9 (3.5)
Territories <0.1 (0) <0.1 (0.1) <0.1 (0.1)
a

Patient age category, sex, race/ethnicity, and census division where the incident occurred are shown. Counts for 2020 represent January through August. Missing values can be ascertained as the difference between each year’s total and the variable-specific total.

Figure. Changes in Emergency Medical Services (EMS)–Observed Overdose Incidents, Cardiac Arrests, and Mobility During the US Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Epidemic.

Figure.

A, Overdose-related cardiac arrests per 100 000 EMS calls for 2018 through August 2020. The average of 2018 and 2019 values is treated as a baseline trend and is shown as a dotted black line. B, Excess in overdose-related cardiac arrests (elevation in 2020 over baseline values) as well as the excess in all overdose-related EMS calls alongside changes in mobility (a measure of social distancing, obtained from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation). The vertical dashed line marks the week of March 16, 2020, the first week in which mobility markedly decreased nationally in the US.

Discussion

We describe a large-magnitude, national surge in overdose-related cardiac arrest during the initial months of the COVID-19 epidemic in the US. Peak rates in May 2020 were more than double the baseline from 2018 and 2019, and overall 2020 values were elevated by approximately 50%. The temporal similarities to decreased mobility suggest that the fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic—perhaps especially social isolation—is sharply accelerating fatal overdose trends. The lack of a commensurate sharp increase in total (fatal and nonfatal) overdose incidents could indicate a rising overdose case fatality rate in a context of more stable, albeit elevated, overdose rates. Many of the trends predicted by public health experts at the outset of the pandemic, such as an increased proportion of individuals using substances alone, increased toxification of the drug supply, and reduced access to treatment, could increase the lethality of each overdose incident.2

These findings are limited, as they reflect a large cohort of EMS agencies for which geographic identifiers below census division are not available that may not capture all nuances of recent epidemiological trends in the US.5 Additionally, shifts in the proportion of overdoses observed nationally by EMS could bias our results up or down. Confirmatory results should be sought as detailed vital registration data become available. Nevertheless, shifts observed here suggest that measures to address the pandemic have largely failed to mitigate overdose risk. These trends implicate investments in substance use treatment, harm reduction, and structural drivers of overdose as core elements of COVID-19 response.

Supplement.

eMethods.

References

  • 1.Katz J, Goodnough A, Sanger-Katz M. In shadow of pandemic, U.S. drug overdose deaths resurge to record. New York Times. July 15, 2020. Accessed September 6, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/07/15/upshot/drug-overdose-deaths.html
  • 2.Wakeman SE, Green TC, Rich J. An overdose surge will compound the COVID-19 pandemic if urgent action is not taken. Nat Med. 2020;26(6):819-820. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0898-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blanco C, Compton WM, Volkow ND. Opportunities for research on the treatment of substance use disorders in the context of COVID-19. JAMA Psychiatry. Published online September 1, 2020. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.3177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lai PH, Lancet EA, Weiden MD, et al. Characteristics associated with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests and resuscitations during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in New York City. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(10):1154-1163. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.2488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lerner EB, Newgard CD, Mann NC. Effect of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the U.S. emergency medical services system: a preliminary report. Acad Emerg Med. Published online June 17, 2020. doi: 10.1111/acem.14051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Reiner RC, Barber RM, Collins JK, et al. Modeling COVID-19 scenarios for the United States. Nat Med. Published online October 23, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1132-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement.

eMethods.


Articles from JAMA Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES