Skip to main content
NIST Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIST Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 4.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019 Sep 11;11(38):35389–35393. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b08829

Thermal Stability of Titanium Contacts to MoS2

Keren M Freedy , Huairuo Zhang ‡,§,*, Peter M Litwin , Leonid A Bendersky §, Albert V Davydov §, Stephen McDonnell †,*
PMCID: PMC7717568  NIHMSID: NIHMS1588346  PMID: 31468959

Abstract

Thermal annealing of Ti contacts is commonly implemented in the fabrication of MoS2 devices; however, its effects on interface chemistry have not been previously reported in the literature. In this work, the thermal stability of titanium contacts deposited on geological bulk single crystals of MoS2 in ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) is investigated with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). In the as-deposited condition, the reaction of Ti with MoS2 is observed resulting in a diffuse interface between the two materials that comprises metallic molybdenum and titanium sulfide compounds. Annealing Ti/MoS2 sequentially at 100, 300, and 600 °C for 30 min in UHV results in a gradual increase in the reaction products as measured by XPS. Accordingly, STEM reveals the formation of a new ordered phase and a Mo-rich layer at the interface following heating. Due to the high degree of reactivity, the Ti/MoS2 interface is not thermally stable even at a transistor operating temperature of 100 °C, while post-deposition annealing further enhances the interfacial reactions. These findings have important consequences for electrical transport properties, highlighting the importance of interface chemistry in the metal contact design and fabrication.

Keywords: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, interface reactions, contacts, thermal annealing

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1588346-f0005.jpg

INTRODUCTION

MoS2 has gained tremendous attention for device applications, offering a high degree of electrostatic control for channel length scaling and the ability to tune electronic and optical properties by simply varying the number of layers.13 It is widely known that the metal/MoS2 contact interface is critical in determining device performance, especially at short channel lengths.47 Annealing devices after contact deposition is a commonly implemented fabrication step in order to improve performance.1,811 Baugher et al.11 claimed that Schottky behavior was eliminated following vacuum annealing of devices with Ti/Au contacts. A decreased contact resistance for Ag contacts to MoS2 was observed by Abraham and Mohney,8 who speculated that annealing causes the diffusion of Ag into MoS2, which results in doping under the contact. In some cases, the effects of annealing are reported to be dependent on the contact metal. For example, Radisavljevic et al.1 reported a factor of 10 decrease in resistance after annealing Au contacts to MoS2, while Ti/Au contacts were reported to behave better without annealing. Similarly, English et al.10 demonstrated very low resistance for annealed Au contacts while Ti contacts behaved poorly.

Changes in device behavior upon annealing are undoubtedly linked to changes in the chemical composition and structure of the metal/MoS2 interface. Interface chemistry is typically overlooked in discussions of device fabrication and electrical properties. Previous studies of the effects of annealing on interface chemistry of UHV-deposited metals on MoS2 have been performed with Cr, Mn, and Fe by Lince et al.1215 These studies demonstrate that thermal annealing has a drastic effect on interface chemistry, particularly for metals that exhibit reactivity with MoS2. Both Cr and Mn react with MoS2 in their as-deposited condition at room temperature. Heating the Cr/MoS2 and Mn/MoS2 interfaces has been found to drive the reaction to completion. In contrast, heating the nonreactive Fe/MoS2 interface was found to decouple the short-range Fe–S chemical interactions at the interface.15

In this work, we examine the effects of thermal annealing on the interface chemistry of Ti contacts to MoS2. Ti contacts are commonly used in MoS2 devices and often annealed at temperatures ranging from 200 to 400 °C.10,16,17 McGovern et al.18 and McDonnell et al.19 have demonstrated that a reaction occurs at room temperature when Ti is deposited on MoS2 in UHV, resulting in the formation of metallic Mo and TixSy compounds. Wu et al.20 arrived at a similar conclusion with density functional theory and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) with electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS). Nevertheless, the literature currently lacks reports on the effects of annealing on the interface chemistry of Ti/MoS2, which is essential for proper interpretation of device data.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

MoS2 geological crystals were used for this work as described in the Experimental Section. Before investigating the effects of thermal annealing, we closely examine the chemistry of the interface in its as-deposited condition. Fitted XPS data of pristine and as-deposited Ti/MoS2 is shown in Figure 1. Following the deposition of a thin layer of Ti in UHV, the Mo0 chemical state is observed in the Mo 3d spectrum. This state appears at 227.83 eV, whereas the Mo–S chemical state is at 229.50 eV. New chemical states in the S 2p spectrum correspond to Ti–S reaction products. This is consistent with previous reports by McGovern et al.18 and McDonnell et al.19 Calculations by McGovern et al.,18 Lince et al.,21 and Gonbeau et al.24 conclude that the reaction to form titanium monosulfide (TiS) from Ti and MoS2 is thermodynamically favorable at 298 K having a Gibbs free energy change of −24.1 kcal/mol. Reference spectra are only available for TiS2 and TiS3 compounds2225 but not for the other sulfides that exist in the Ti–S system.26 TiS2 has its 2p3/2 component at 160.8 eV.23,24 TiS3 is characterized by two S 2p chemical states, one corresponding to the S2− atom at 161.2 eV and one corresponding to the S22− disulfide cluster at 162.5 eV.23 Our S 2p spectra do not consistently match with either indicating that a different stoichiometry occurs. Our spectra indicate that new chemical states exist with 2p3/2 components at 162.49 and 163.36 eV. The S–Mo chemical state is at 162.34 eV. Both the Mo–S and S–Mo states in Mo 3d and S 2p, respectively, exhibit a shift of 0.34 eV to higher binding energy. This is indicative of a shift in the position of the Fermi level, which indicates that the Ti overlayer and its reaction products result in n-type doping of the substrate. Ti and Mo metals have been shown to be n-type dopants in MoS2.27,28

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Mo 3d and S 2p core levels before and after Ti deposition.

Atomic-resolution annular dark field STEM (ADF-STEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and EELS spectrum-imaging (SI) data acquired from a cross section of the as-deposited Ti/MoS2 are shown in Figure 2. The ADF-STEM image reveals the presence of a disordered Mo- and S-rich layer in contact with MoS2 (Figure 2a). This layer exhibits a diffuse interface with a Ti-rich disordered layer at the surface. The EDS measurements along with EELS line-scans provide unambiguous evidence of Ti diffusion into MoS2 as well as S and Mo out-diffusion into the Ti layer (Figure 2ad). Similar STEM/EELS analysis of the Ti/MoS2 interface by Wu et al.20 has shown the presence of Ti atoms in the topmost five layers, while the chemical composition of the metal contact was assumed to be pure Ti. This assumption would appear to be inconsistent with our results, which show a substantial presence of Mo and S in the Ti layer (see Figure 2c,d). We note that Wu et al.20 acknowledged that the density of Ti increased with the distance away from the Ti–MoS2 interface, and therefore, these results may in fact be consistent. Cross-sectional HAADF-STEM analysis shows an ~7 nm thick Mo/S-rich amorphous layer due to the damage of MoS2 during Ti deposition.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(a) Cross-sectional ADF-STEM image of as deposited Ti/MoS2 showing disordered Ti-rich and Mo/S-rich layers, (b) 90° rotated ADF-STEM image showing the dotted white line where an EDS and EELS line-scan was simultaneously acquired, and (c) the corresponding EDS line profiles of the Ti-K, Mo-K (enlarged five times), and the overlapped Mo-L and S-K edges, and (d) EELS line profiles of S-L and Ti-L edges. False colors are added in the ADF-STEM images to aid the eye.

The XPS spectra acquired during the in situ sequential annealing are shown in Figure 3a with the intensity ratios shown in Figure 3b. A substantial increase in reaction products is observed after 100 °C exposure as highlighted in Figure 3c. While this change is minor in comparison with the other annealing temperatures, it may have important implications for reliability of MoS2 transistors since 100 °C is within the range of transistor operating temperatures.7 At 300 °C, we observe a clear increase in the Mo0 intensity relative to that of the Mo–S state, accompanied by an overall broadening of the S 2p spectra as more Mo–S bonds are broken to form new TixSy states. Figure 3b highlights the increase in the total S/MoS2 ratio, indicative of the increased difiusion of S to the surface. At 600 °C, the Mo–S chemical state is nearly completely consumed. We note that additional 100 °C anneals after annealing to higher temperatures exhibited no detectable change in interface chemistry. This suggests that the interface could be stabilized to avoid changes at operating temperatures. However, we highlight that earlier work has demonstrated that as-deposited Ti/Au contacts perform better before annealing.1

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

(a) XPS spectra acquired following 30 min anneals at each temperature. These were performed sequentially on the same sample. (b) Intensity ratios based on the data in panel (a), whereas panel (c) highlights the changes that occur at 100 °C.

The Ti 2p spectra exhibit broadening due to the superposition of the different Ti–S states and show a decrease in intensity with increasing temperature. The reason for the apparent increase in the Ti/MoS2 intensity ratio in Figure 3b can be understood as the result of the MoS2 signal decreasing more significantly than the decrease of the Ti signal. The decrease in Ti intensity can be explained as a result of Ti diffusion into the MoS2 substrate and its potential agglomeration. Durbin et al.13 reported that, in the case of Cr/MoS2, annealing to 650 °C drives the reaction between Cr and MoS2 while simultaneously causing coalescence of the Cr-containing portion of the film. Additionally, the core-level shift exhibited by the sample increases by another +0.36 eV after the final heating step at 600 °C, amounting to a total shift of 0.70 eV to higher binding energy compared to the pristine MoS2 surface.

A cross-sectional ADF-STEM image of a sample annealed at 400 °C is shown in Figure 4a. The disordered Mo/S-rich layer on the top of MoS2 in the as-deposited sample was partially recrystallized. The fast Fourier transform (FFT) images in Figure 4b,c, obtained from locations indicated in Figure 4a, suggest that this recrystallized layer has a structure similar to that of MoS2. In addition, an approximately 2 nm thick layer with an enhanced contrast was found on the top of the recrystallized layer. The EELS line-scan in Figure 4d,e shows a fast decrease in S and Ti in this thin layer, while the EDS mapping in Figure 4fi confirms that it is Mo-rich.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

(a) Cross-sectional ADF-STEM image of Ti/MoS2 after 30 min anneal at 400 °C showing a Mo-rich layer and a partially recrystallized layer grown out from the disordered Mo/S-rich layer, (b,c) FFT images of the white dotted-line framed regions in panel (a), (d) 90° rotated ADF-STEM image showing the dotted white line where an EELS line-scan was acquired, and (e) the corresponding EELS line profiles of the S-L and Ti-L edges, the black dash-dot lines showing the fast dip of S and Ti in the Mo-rich layer. (f) ADF-STEM image showing the white dotted-line framed region where EDS mapping was acquired and (g) the corresponding Mo-K, (h) Ti-K, and (i) the overlapped Mo-L and S-K edge maps. False colors are added to aid the eye.

CONCLUSIONS

The results shown here indicate that the Ti/MoS2 interface is highly reactive: a disordered, compositionally graded layer, composed of Mo0 and TixSy species, forms at the surface of the MoS2 crystal following the deposition of Ti. Thermal annealing in the 100–400 °C temperature range results in further chemical and structural changes at the Ti/MoS2 interface and causes a degradation of the Ti metal contact. STEM provides evidence for the formation of new ordered phases upon heating to 400 °C that did not exist in the as-deposited sample. Our work strongly suggests that the effects of thermal annealing on the compositional and structural evolution of the Ti/MoS2 interface must be taken into account when developing a post-deposition annealing process in the device fabrication steps and when interpreting changes in device characteristics after annealing.

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

MoS2 geological single crystals (SPI29) were cleaned by mechanical exfoliation, mounted onto Mo plates with Ta foil, and then immediately loaded into a Scienta Omicron UHV30 system described elsewhere with a base pressure of 2 × 10−9 mtorr.31 XPS data was acquired at a pass energy of 50 eV with a monochromated 1486.7 eV Al Kα X-ray source. XPS data was acquired on the pristine samples prior to metal deposition. A thin layer of metal was deposited by electron beam evaporation (Mantis Quad EV-C) in our UHV system, and XPS data was acquired in situ after deposition. Samples were heated in the UHV chamber to 100, 300, and 600 °C for 30 min at each temperature with ramp and cool times of approximately 30 min each. XPS measurements were performed following each heat treatment.

Two samples were prepared for STEM: the first one did not undergo heat treatment following deposition, and the second sample was heated directly to 400 °C for 30 min. An FEI Nova NanoLab 600 dual-beam scanning electron microscopy and focused ion beam (SEM/FIB) system was employed to prepare cross sections of the samples. Using electron beam deposition, 10 nm carbon and subsequently 100 nm Pt were deposited on the top of the sample to protect its surface followed by 2 μm Pt capping by ion-beam-induced deposition. To reduce Ga-ion damage in the final step of FIB preparation, the STEM samples were thinned with 2 kV Ga ions using a low beam current of 29 pA and a small incident angle of 3°. An FEI Titan 80–300 STEM/TEM equipped with a monochromator and a probe spherical-aberration corrector was employed to perform atomic-resolution STEM imaging, X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) spectrum-imaging (SI). Atomic-resolution annular dark field (ADF) STEM images were acquired with an operating voltage of 300 kV, probe convergence angle of 14 mrad, and collection angle of 34–195 mrad.

Supplementary Material

Supp1

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

A.V.D. acknowledges the support of Material Genome Initiative funding allocated to NIST. H.Z. acknowledges support from the U.S. Department of Commerce, NIST, under the financial assistance award 70NANB17H249. Research Innovation Funding from the UVA School of Engineering and Applied Science is acknowledged.

Footnotes

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b08829.

XPS spectra of the samples prepared for STEM analysis (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

REFERENCES

  • (1).Radisavljevic B; Radenovic A; Brivio J; Giacometti V; Kis A Single-Layer MoS2 Transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 147–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Amani M; Lien D-H; Kiriya D; Xiao J; Azcatl A; Noh J; Madhvapathy SR; Addou R; KC S; Dubey M; Cho K; Wallace RM; Lee S-C; He J-H; Ager JW III; Zhang X; Yablonovitch E; Javey A Near-Unity Photoluminescence Quantum Yield in MoS2. Science 2015, 350, 1065–1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Mak KF; Lee C; Hone J; Shan J; Heinz TF Atomically Thin MoS2: A New Direct-Gap Semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 136805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Allain A; Kang J; Banerjee K; Kis A Electrical Contacts to Two-Dimensional Semiconductors. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 1195–1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Kang J; Liu W; Banerjee K High-Performance MoS2 Transistors with Low-Resistance Molybdenum Contacts. Appl Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, No. 093106. [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Liu H; Neal AT; Ye PD Channel Length Scaling of MoS2 MOSFETs. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 8563–8569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Giannazzo F; Fisichella G; Piazza A; Di Franco S; Greco G; Agnello S; Roccaforte F Impact of Contact Resistance on the Electrical Properties of MoS2 Transistors at Practical Operating Temperatures. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol 2017, 8, 254–263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Abraham M; Mohney SE Annealed Ag Contacts to MoS2 Field-Effect Transistors. J. Appl Phys. 2017, 122, 115306. [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Han J; Lee J; Lee J; Woo H; Kim J; Jo Y; Cho S; Kim H; Kim H; Pawar SM; Inamdar AI; Jung W; Im H Electrical Properties of N2- and H2 -Annealed Bulk MoS2/Metal Junctions. J. Korean Phys. Soc 2015, 67, 1228–1231. [Google Scholar]
  • (10).English CD; Shine G; Dorgan VE; Saraswat KC; Pop E Improved Contacts to MoS2 Transistors by Ultra-High Vacuum Metal Deposition. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 3824–3830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Baugher BWH; Churchill HOH; Yang Y; Jarillo-Herrero P Intrinsic Electronic Transport Properties of High-Quality Monolayer and Bilayer MoS2. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 4212–4216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Durbin TD; Lince JR; Didziulis SV; Shuh DK; Yarmoff JA Soft X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Study of the Interaction of Cr with MoS2(0001). Surf. Sci. 1994, 302, 314–328. [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Durbin TD; Lince JR; Yarmoff JA Chemical Interaction of Thin Cr Films with the MoS2(0001) Surface Studied by X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and Scanning Auger Microscopy. J. Vac. Sci Technol. A 1992, 10, 2529–2534. [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Lince JR; Stewart TB; Fleischauer PD; Yarmoff JA; Taleb-Ibrahimi A The Chemical Interaction of Mn with the MoS2(0001) Surface Studied by High-Resolution Photoelectron Spectroscopy. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 1989, 7, 2469–2474. [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Lince JR; Stewart TB; Hills MM; Fleischauer PD; Yarmoff JA; Taleb-Ibrahimi A Photoelectron Spectroscopic Study of the Interaction of Thin Fe Films with the MoS2(0001) Surface . Surf. Sci 1989, 223, 65–81. [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Qiu H; Pan L; Yao Z; Li J; Shi Y; Wang X Electrical Characterization of Back-Gated Bi-Layer MoS2 Field-Effect Transistors and the Effect of Ambient on Their Performances. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 123104. [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Li H-M; Lee D-Y; Choi MS; Qu D; Liu X; Ra C-H; Yoo WJ Metal-Semiconductor Barrier Modulation for High Photoresponse in Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Field Effect Transistors. Sci Rep 2014, 4, 4041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).McGovern IT; Dietz E; Rotermund HH; Bradshaw AM; Braun W; Radlik W; McGilp JF Soft X-ray Photoemission Spectroscopy of Metal-Molybdenum Bisulphide Interfaces. Surf. Sci. 1985, 152–153, 1203–1212. [Google Scholar]
  • (19).McDonnell S; Smyth C; Hinkle CL; Wallace RM MoS2–Titanium Contact Interface Reactions. ACS Appl Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 8289–8294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Wu RJ; Udyavara S; Ma R; Wang Y; Chhowalla M; Koester SJ; Neurock M; Mkhoyan KA An Inside Look at the Ti-MoS2 Contact in Ultra-thin Field Effect Transistor with Atomic Resolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.01377 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Lince JR; Carre DJ; Fleischauer PD Schottky-Barrier Formation on a Covalent Semiconductor without Fermi-Level Pinning: The Metal-MoS2 Interface. Phys. Rev. B 1987, 36, 1647–1656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Endo K; Ihara H; Watanabe K; Gonda S-I XPS Study of One-Dimensional Compounds: TiS3. J. Solid State Chem. 1982, 44, 268–272. [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Hawkins CG; Whittaker-Brooks L Controlling Sullur Vacancies in TiS2–x Cathode Insertion Hosts via the Conversion of TiS3 Nanobelts for Energy-Storage Applications. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2018, 1, 851–859. [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Gonbeau D; Guimon C; Pfister-Guillouzo G; Levasseur A; Meunier G; Dormoy R XPS Study of Thin Films of Titanium Oxysulfides. Surf. Sci 1991, 254, 81–89. [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Fleet ME; S. L.; Liu X; Nesbitt HW Polarized X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy and XPS of TiS3: S K- and Ti L-edge XANES and S and Ti 2p XPS. Surf. Sci. 2005, 584, 133–145. [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Murray JL The S–Ti (Sullur-Titanium) System. BuH. Aííoy Phase Diagrams 1986, 7, 156–163. [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Tsai Y-C; Li Y Impact of Doping Concentration on Electronic Properties of Transition Metal-Doped Monolayer Molybdenum Disulfide. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2018, 65, 733–738. [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Feng L.-p.; Su J; Liu Z.-t. Effect of Vacancies in Monolayer MoS2 on Electronic Properties of Mo–MoS2 Contacts. RSC Adv 2015, 5, 20538–20544. [Google Scholar]
  • (29).SPI, https://www.2spi.com/.
  • (30).Certain commercial equipment instruments or materials are identified in this paper to foster understanding. Such identification does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology nor does it imply that the materials or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
  • (31).Freedy KM; Litwin PM; McDonnell SJ (Invited) InVacuo Studies of Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Synthesis and Layered Material Integration. ECS Trans 2017, 77, 11–25. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp1

RESOURCES